Premium Essay

Rodriguez V. United States

In: Historical Events

Submitted By northsatin85
Words 687
Pages 3
Rodriguez v. United States
For a long time, Americans have been victims not only of torture but also unreasonable searches and seizures conducted by police officers. However, the status has changed after passing of a related legislation which has effected an alteration in the U.S. Constitution. The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States has apparently changed the right of the American citizens’ protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. According to the document, individuals have a right to be or feel secured in houses against unreasonable captures and searches. The amendment limits the power of police to search people and seize their homes and property.
The applications of the Fourth Amendment in reality, particularly in courts today, have even surprised those who drafted it. The judgment from the case Rodriguez v. the United States is primarily based on the provisions of the document to the Constitution. In this case, a k-9 officer, Morgan Struble, stopped Rodriguez on grounds of driving on the shoulder of a highway, which is a violation of the Nebraska law. The policeman then attended to everything connected with the stopping, including issuing a warning for dangerous driving checking the driving license of Rodriguez. The officer asked the permission to walk his dog around Rodriguez’s car, which was denied. He then ordered the offender to step out of his vehicle while waiting for backup to come. Once the other policemen had arrived at the scene, Morgan Struble had his dog to sniff

the suspect’s car. The animal alerted to the existence of drugs (significant amounts of methamphetamine) in Rodriguez’s car. Consequently, the offender was charged with the possession of drugs (Maclin 18). However, at the trial, the suspect requested the court to reject the evidence presented before him on grounds that the officers violated his…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Business Law Case Study

...Mora v. Jackson Memorial Foundation, Inc., United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit, Florida (2010) FACTS - Josephine Mora, who was 62 at the time, worked for the Jackson Memorial Foundation Inc. as a fundraiser. She initially worked in a division where she conducted media relations and solicited donors but her immediate supervisor Mrs. Chea was not pleased with Mora’s work and recommended to the CEO Mr. Rodriguez that Mora be terminated. However, Mr. Rodriguez decided to give Plaintiff a different position in his own office “where he could observe her more closely,.” but did not inform Mora that she had been terminated from her position. After a month of errors and issues Mr. Rodriguez fired Mora explaining that he “needed need someone younger I can pay less ... I need an Elena [Quevedo, a 25 year old employee].” Another co worker confirmed that she heard the conversation as well as Mr. Rodriguez calling Mora “old and inept.” Another employee also stated that Mr. Rodriguez said that Mora was “too old to be working here anyway,” although Rodriguez denies that he made any of those discriminatory-sounding statements. The Supreme Court ruled out the idea of a “mixed motive” ADEA claim, instead requiring Mora to show that age was the only or main cause of termination. The ADEA requires that “age [be] the ‘reason’ that the employer decided to act.” Therefore the ruling was in favor for Jackson Memorial Foundation. Mora appealed the decision ISSUE– Did Jackson......

Words: 467 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Abortion Philosophy Paper

...Alexia Rodriguez 12-07-11 Making the Ultimate Choice With the evolving moral standards of society, abortions are becoming more and more justified. Abortion, the practice of removing a fertilized egg from a mother, has become a controversial issue in American society, but should be generally supported because of women’s rights, religious and personal beliefs should not interfere with government and laws, in case of rape or incest, abortion is a safe medical procedure, and even with responsible use of contraceptives unwanted pregnancies still occurs. A woman's right to choose abortion is a fundamental right recognized by the US Supreme Court case Roe v. Wade since Jan. 22, 1973. The Roe v. Wade decision held that a woman, with her doctor, could choose abortion in earlier months of pregnancy without legal restriction, and with restrictions in later months, based on the right to privacy. Abortions during the first trimester of pregnancy were invalidated by Roe v. Wade. State laws limiting such access during the second trimester were upheld only when the restrictions were for the purpose of protecting the health of the pregnant woman. The court case legalized abortion in the United States, which was not legal at all in many states and was limited by law in others. The Supreme Court chose to base its decision on the Fourteenth Amendment. The fourteenth amendment is based on the fact that U.S. citizenship is a birthright and blocks states from taking actions that......

Words: 1685 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Public Funding Essay

...The Complex Issue of Public School Funding Ever since the beginning of the United States, the founding fathers and citizens have emphasized the importance on the education of its people, child or adult. Although education exists in this country both publicly and privately, the public school systems have become a powerful resource in many political social issues in this country. Recently, however, many debates have sprung up over issues that deal with the process of funding public education, including: Who is ultimately responsible for funding? How much funding should local, state, and federal governments contribute? How should funds be distributed? Questions such as these have been raised in the United States because of the many problems with education that are prevalent today despite funding. One of the biggest problems is inequality in education powered by property tax values. Numerous research data has shown how the unequal effects of funding from local property taxes has had on the level of education available in the same school districts. This essay will discuss if there are more fair methods to funding public schools than what is presently the norm through local property taxation and also talk about the effects that this kind of funding has on the standard of education that students receive. Each state of the United States manages its own school districts, which includes the administration of funds that pays for these school districts’ costs, with comparatively...

Words: 1302 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Stand Your Ground

...stand their ground. A quick breakdown of this law is that it give a person legal cover in the event that they find themselves in a certain situation in which their survival, or the preservation of their family necessitates them to stand their ground and use a weapon for defense. This law can be referenced back to the Supreme Court case Beard v. United States, 158 U.S. 550 (1895). It is defined in this case that, “A man assailed on his own grounds, without provocation, by a person armed with a deadly weapon and apparently seeking his life is not obliged to retreat, but may stand his ground and defend himself with such means as are within his control; and so long as there is no intent on his part to kill his antagonist, and no purpose of doing anything beyond what is necessary to save his own life, is not guilty of murder or manslaughter if death results to his antagonist from a blow given him under such circumstances (www.justia.com). In Houston, Texas a “Stand-your-ground” case has brought a lot of attention, but also a lot of controversy. In this case Raul Rodriguez was found guilty of killing his neighbor over a dispute over loud music. Rodriguez who was a retired firefighter got angry because of the loud noise coming from his neighbor’s house while they were having a birthday party. He confronted his neighbor...

Words: 298 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Mapp V. Ohio Synopsis

...Mapp v. Ohio Synopsis Who was involved? Dollree Mapp had numerous connections to the underground world of boxing and illegal gambling. She was married to and had previous relationships with boxers and promoters who were big in the Midwest at the time. Mapp was first brought to Law Enforcement’s attention by having a potential connection to a bombing suspect named Virgil Ogletree. The police had heard from an anonymous tip that Ogletree might be hiding out within Mapp’s home. The police soon showed up, knocked, and asked if they could search the house. Mapp being somewhat aware of her rights refused entry to the police. They returned in greater numbers, forcibly entered the home, conducted a search and found Ogletree who was eventually cleared of all charges. However, the police did come across what is noted as “obscene material” which Mapp claimed was found within a footlocker of a previous tenant. The material collected being betting slips, a pistol, and some pornography. Mapp was later cleared of the charges pertaining to the betting slips located in the house but was later asked to testify against members of the illegal betting operation. Mapp refused and was later charged with possession of “lewd and lascivious books, pictures, and photographs”. She was sentenced to 7 years and immediately filed an appeal. This is where the story of Mapp v. Ohio really begins. What was argued? Mapp’s appeal argued that her 4th, 5th, and 8th amendments rights were violated....

Words: 737 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Electronic Surveillance of Employees

...privacy on e-mail, using “voluntariness” of e-mail communications and property-based notions of ownership of computer systems to negate employees’ privacy interests in their e-mail communications. Most of employees can expect to have reasonable privacy outside their workplace to challenge a search that he or she has a “possessory or proprietary interest” in the area searched and have a relationship between his or her area and the workplace. Determining whether a legitimate or justifiable expectation of privacy exists, in turn, involves two inquiries. First, the employee must show a subjective expectation of privacy in the area searched, and second, that expectation must be one that "society is prepared to recognize as 'reasonable. (Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517,). 2. In the office workplace there are typically two types of workspaces, an open area, in which there are several desks and where conversations can be overhead, or an enclosed office, in which when the door is closed- conversations cannot be heard and where one would expect virtually total privacy. Explain whether it makes a difference if an employee is in an open area or in an enclosed office. Courts evaluate the employee’s privacy expectation by asking first if the employee has a biased expectation of privacy. Courts take into account how much notice an employer gives its employees and where in the workplace a camera or a monitoring system is placed. Employees generally have a weaken expectation of privacy......

Words: 1695 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Analysis 1.1: Understanding Rhetorical Structure

...EN1420 ITT-Technical Institute, 054 Arizona bills require police to wear body cameras What is happening in the Old Pueblo? Tucsonan’s all over the city are in a state of distress over the recent but dramatic crime wave that has struck the City. “In the wake of several high-profile police shooting deaths, two bills have been introduced in the Arizona Legislature this session calling for all law-enforcement officers to wear body cameras,” ( Patrick McNamara para. 1). The real question on many citizens’ minds is “to who are these bills really protecting and how are we benefiting?” In response Rep. Reginald Bolding, D-Phoenix had to this say “The genesis of the bill comes from the community distrust issues that we’ve seen,”. (McNamara para. 3). So due to the increase of crime in Tucson and the general distrust from the people towards law enforcement, the government would have the general public believe that the implementation of body cameras on every police officer is in the people’s best interest. For many concerned Tucsonan’s this is nothing more than to suppress the people and misuse city funds when it can very well be used in more beneficial ways, one example given was “have you driven through South Tucson lately?” She explains how the roads are all full of patches and potholes as opposed to being repaved. United States Marine Jim McCoy shared his thoughts on the matter “If anyone should be wearing body cameras its politicians. This politician (Bolding) made his career......

Words: 864 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Personal Dilemma Paper Cja/324

...Personal Dilemma Paper Jocelyn Nelson CJA 324 August 3, 2015 Frederick Brockmeier On July 10, 2015, Sandra Bland was pulled over by Texas state trooper Brian Encinia for what was thought to be a routine traffic stop for not using her signal while changing lanes. For Sandra, what began as a routine traffic stop turned into an arrest and causing a three day detention and eventually her death. The initial cause of death has been ruled a suicide, but after seeing the dashcam video and learning more about Bland’s life, several questions come to mind. One question is, ‘Was her arrest lawful under the constitution?” The Nature of the Dilemma According to Professor Jonathan Oberman – a professor of law and longtime director of the criminal defense clinic at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law – three Supreme Court cases taken together may determine whether Encinia’s actions were legally justified. The first is Atwater v. City of Lago Vista, a 2001 case in which the high court determined that it is lawful under the Fourth Amendment for a law enforcement officer to arrest a person who has been stopped for a routine traffic violation. The second case is Rodriguez v. United States, a case the court just decided in April, which posed the question: During a routine traffic stop, what duration is considered legally legitimate, and under what circumstances can that duration be lawfully extended (Kleinman, 2014)? In this case officer Encinia was within the law to stop Bland and...

Words: 980 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Constitutional Distortion

...Constitutional Distortion Become Common Practice in the Mexican-American Border region? The Unites states has implemented permanent Inland Immigration Checkpoints on all major roads leading away from Mexico in the southern states. Are these checkpoints Legal? Can you refuse? What are your rights? Does the law agree with them? These questions are important and mostly left unanswered. The research shows a major dividing line between literal interpretation of the fourth amendment, and the government’s insistence on distorting the constitution, vital to ensureing our national security. Inland immigration checkpoints provide a vital role in ensuring the safety of the United States. Their existence although a minor inconvenience to many motorists, is crucial in stopping the trafficking of drugs and illegal immigration. The U.S. Border Patrol, a component of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency, a part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), aims to apprehend persons who illegally enter the United States between official ports of entry, including potential terrorists, aliens, and contraband smugglers, thereby deterring or stopping illegal activity.(DHS 2012). The Supreme Court first approved of law enforcement roadblocks in a case involving the Border Patrol’s practice of stopping traffic on major highways to prevent the trafficking of illegal aliens. (U.S. v. Martinez-Fuerte). The Court also first introduced the idea of a balancing test for roadblocks......

Words: 1213 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Claw13 Cases (Negotiable Instrument)

...ANG TEK LIAN, Petitioner, v. THE COURT OF APPEALS, Respondent. EN BANC [G.R. No. L-2516. September 25, 1950.] ANG TEK LIAN, Petitioner, v. THE COURT OF APPEALS, Respondent. Laurel, Sabido, Almario & Laurel, for Petitioner. Solicitor General Felix Bautista Angelo and Solicitor Manuel Tomacruz, for Respondent. SYLLABUS 1. CRIMINAL LAW; ESTAFA" ; ISSUING CHECK WITH INSUFFICIENT BANK DEPOSIT TO COVER THE SAME. — One who issues a check payable to cash to accomplish deceit and knows that at the time had no sufficient deposit with the bank to cover the amount of the check and without informing the payee of such circumstances, is guilty of estafa as provided by article 315, paragraph (d), subsection 2 of the Revised Penal Code. 2. NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS; CHECK DRAWN PAYABLE TO THE ORDER OF "CASH" ; INDORSEMENT. — A check payable to the order of "cash to the person presenting it for payment without the drawer’s indorsement. D E C I S I O N BENGZON, J.: For having issued a rubber check, Ang Tek Lian was convicted of estafa in the Court of First Instance of Manila. The Court of Appeals affirmed the verdict. It appears that, knowing he had no funds therefor, Ang Tek Lian drew on Saturday, November 16, 1946, the check Exhibit A upon the China Banking Corporation for the sum of P4,000, payable to the order of "cash." He delivered it to Lee Hua Hong in exchange for money which the latter handed in the act. On November 18, 1946, the next business day, the...

Words: 20070 - Pages: 81

Free Essay

Enhanced Interrogation Techniques

...Are Enhanced Interrogation Techniques Effective and Should the United States Government Use Them? James A. Bradley II Having grown up in the age of the internet, I have seen the news stories and videos of 9/11. It has made me wonder several questions such as “Why pick America, of all places, to attack?” or “What did we do to retaliate?” To this day we still aren’t sure of the actual reasoning behind it, but we still have theories. As for retaliation, the government sought out those who did this to our country. I first became interested in this topic this past semester for political science. In groups of two, we had to write a paper based on a topic that we could select. Before doing extensive research into the topic, more questions were forming in my mind. I wanted to know what our government did to seek out justice against those who participated in 9/11. Even though my partner and I collectively had to choose a side, I wasn’t quite sure what side I choosing. Then the research continued. I researched deeper in to the subject. With what little research I had done, I started into the paper. Enhanced interrogation techniques are what the conservatives call it. Liberals call it torture. The more important question is this: Does it work? Liberals say no, while the conservatives say yes. In the eyes of a conservative it might read something like this: We believe that enhanced interrogation techniques work and provide results faster than sting operations that could take years...

Words: 1564 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Law and Ethics

...Health Laws and Regulations Melissa Rodriguez HCS/545 September 7, 2014 Louise Underdahl Introduction Laws and regulation in today’s health care is vast. The health and well-being of our society depends upon these laws and regulations. To try to understand and keep up with all of the laws and regulations would by a full time job. The information available is very vast and the types of laws and regulations can vary depending on what type of health care facility or physicians practice that are being addressed. The government whether it is local federal or state are where these laws and regulation are made and implemented. There are also private sectors and organizations who help to develop regulations. To try and understand what the laws or regulations are about or who or what they might be meant for, there needs to be an understanding of what the agencies are that regulate them. When we look at the federal jurisdiction there are some that once said many people are familiar with such as Center for Medicare and Medicaid, CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the FDA(Food and Drug Administration). The state level agencies would consist of the following, welfare department, insurance, and the health department. The private sector brings organizations in which play important roles when it comes to health care laws and regulations. The following are part of the private sector organizations NCQA (National Committee of Quality Assurance) and JCHAO......

Words: 1540 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Procurement Is an Integral Part of Resource-Based View of an Organization

...  Procurement,   or   in   many   context,   usually   referred   to   as   “outsourcing”,   is   defined   as  “  astrategic  decision  that  entails  the  external  contracting  of  determined  non-­‐ strategic  activities  or  business  processes  necessary  for  the  manufacture  of  goods   or   the   provision   of   services   by   means   of   agreements   or   contracts   with   higher   capability  firms  to  undertake  those  activities  or  business  processes,  with  the  aim   of   improving   competitive   advantage”   (Espino   Rodriguez   and   Padron   Robaina,   2006).  According  to  resource-­‐based  view,  resources  can  be  exploited  by  means   of   contracts   (Barney,   1999,   Gainey   and   Klaas,   2003,   Grant,   1991)   and   this   perspective   can   be   used   as   a   framework   to   help   organizations   decide   which   activities   should   be   outsourced   and   which   to   perform   in-­‐house.   In   this   regard,   one  of  the  dominant  frameworks  that  explain  the  propensity  of  procurement  is   core  competences  approach ......

Words: 5448 - Pages: 22

Premium Essay

Colorado Sem. (Univ. Denver) V. Ncaa

...Colorado Seminary (University of Denver) v. National Collegiate Athletic Association This action was brought by the University of Denver (“DU”) and several of its student-athletes to enjoin the National Collegiate Athletic Association (“NCAA”) from imposing sanctions against DU and declaring several of its hockey players ineligible. Colorado Seminary (Univ. of Denver) v. Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, 570 F.2d 320, 321 (10th Cir. 1978), aff’d, Colorado Seminary (Univ. of Denver) v. Nat’l Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, 417 F.Supp. 885 (D.Co. 1976). Because DU refused to enforce the ineligibility of several of its hockey players despite the NCAA’s declaration of such, the DU hockey team was put on a two-year probation period, all DU athletic teams were unable to participate in post-season NCAA events and have its regular season games be televised, and the University was forced to forfeit its 1973 national title. 570 F.2d at 321. Plaintiffs claimed that the NCAA violated their due process and equal protection rights through its ineligibility declaration, however the trial court disagreed, denying Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in favor of Defendant’s, albeit with some conditions. 417 F.Supp. at 893, 900. Plaintiffs appealed the denial, but the 10th Circuit affirmed the trial court’s decision and ultimately held that: the “students’ interest in participating in intercollegiate athletics did not rise to level of the constitutionally-protected property or liberty......

Words: 2676 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Legal Reserach and Writing

...PLEAS OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY PENNSYLVANIA John Smith FAMILY DIVISION Plaintiff V Amanda Smith Defendant MEMORANDUM ISSUE Our Client, John Smith wishes to file a modification of child custody giving him full physical custody of his children, Joshua age 6 and Taylor age 3, in response to his former wife’s petition for relocation to Michigan. RULE With any child custody case, including petitions for modification, the paramount concern is the best interests of the child. Johns v. Cioci, 865 A.2d 931, 936 (Pa. Super. 2004). ARGUMENT The Parties were married on June 19,1998 and as a result of that union, their two minor children, Joshua age 6 and Taylor age 3 were born. The parties were separated April 4, 2006 because of the mothers infidelity. The current custody order was put into effect July 9, 2006 giving full physical custody to the mother with shared legal custody and visitation for the father. The mother has filed a motion for relocation to Michigan to live with her current boyfriend that she met on the Internet. In June of 2006, she met him in person for the first time herself and her children. She frequently takes the children to Michigan to visit her boyfriend and his family. She also insists that the children call the boyfriends mother grandma. The boyfriend, BJ Rodriguez, raises pit bulls for breeding purposes and dog fighting. Currently at his residence, there are 6 adult dogs and 13......

Words: 771 - Pages: 4