...The Speech by Ronald Reagan on May 5, 1985, to the German war cemetery at Bitburg as requested by West German Chancellor Helmut Kohl, for a wreath-laying ceremony. This cemetery and the President's speech are historically significant because they marked the 40th Anniversary of the Allied victory in World War II. After where President Ronald Reagan gave a speech at an Airforce base in Germany to the service member, Germans, and Jewish survivors and remembers. President Ronald Reagan knew what he was walking into, and instead of the denning request, The President did the wreath laying and speech. With all intent to come out ahead, knowing he was up against a wall, where he was undoubtedly supposed to fail. Not only did Ronald Reagan, do the wreath laying and walk the German war cemetery but gave an outstanding speech that would honor him as a great speaker. How would President Ronald Reagan turn out with such criticism against him visiting this German war grave site were 48-SS soldiers wear also buried. Laying a wreath for the so-called enemy and turning a blind eye to what it...
Words: 1472 - Pages: 6
...Ronald Reagan The United States held an extent of catastrophes throughout the nineteen hundreds which includes: the Great Depression, Explosion of the Challenger Space Shuttle, WWI, WWII, and Civil Rights Movement. Despite the fact that there were disasters in the United States, Ronald Reagan creates an analogy of the dark times and the bright economic results. Reagan uses the appeal to logic and the appeal to emotion to define all of the successful turnouts they’ve had. Parallelism and a bit of Allusion are revealed in Ronalds speech describing our “Challenger heroes” and parallelism to demonstrate the “American Dream.” When Ronald creates these rhetorical devices, it helps prove his point on how American is becoming a better country even...
Words: 298 - Pages: 2
...Part I: Analyzing the Rhetorical Situation in Ronald Reagan’s Challenger Address. In this article, using the rhetorical situation, I will dissect the logical circumstance of the authentic discourse "The Challenger Address" conveyed by the 40th president of the United States, Ronald Reagan. The rhetorical situation is comprises of four components: audience, event, speaker and occasion, each one surveying the nature of discourse. Americans had elevated requirements of the space programs, which proposed to give the United States an extraordinary feeling of accomplishment. The importance of the space project lies basically in which symbolized American grandness in science and innovation (Lambright). Therefore, the gathering of people of Reagan's discourse was American open; the individuals who had encountered the shocking national misfortune of seven American space explorers came about because of the disappointment of space administration. Confirmations of Reagan continually including American subjects predominate...
Words: 706 - Pages: 3
...for the Soviet Union, Reagan was initially distant and distrustful in both rhetoric and policy. He spoke of it as an “evil empire.” His foremost policy was that of containment: preventing countries vulnerable to communism from becoming communist. Parting with the policy of his predecessors, Reagan harbored no illusions about the efficacy of detente, a cornerstone policy under Nixon and Ford. After growing anxious of Soviet nuclear capability, Reagan upped defense spending, It was then that he begun the SDI program (Strategic Defense Initiative), or Star Wars program, its affectionate name. It was...
Words: 719 - Pages: 3
...Eng 105 09 February 16 Ronald Reagan and the Shuttle Challenger Crash On January 28, 1986, Ronald Reagan delivered a speech on the topic of the shuttle Challenger crash from the oval office in Washington D.C. In his speech, he discusses the events that took place and speaks to many about the tragedy. He addresses the children who watched it happen live, NASA workers, the families of the victims, and everyone else in the United States. He discusses what we will do next because even though this is a time of much tragedy we as a nation need to stand together and continue to go on our journey. Ronald Reagan effectively uses pathos and logos to inform the nation of the tragedy and to persuade them that we must not...
Words: 1129 - Pages: 5
...Ronald Reagan, was an actor, governor of California and the first actor to ever successfully achieve the highest in the United States. At the time of his presidential election, he was sixty nine years old making him the oldest person to sworn to office.On June 12, 1987 President Reagan delivered his speech at the Brandenburg gate in West Berlin. The Berlin Wall was built during the Cold War, The communist East German authorities built a wall that totally encircled West Berlin. Despite the spread of communism of East Berlin, Reagan proposed his speech to 45,000 people at the Brandenburg gate. Reagan appeals to pathos, repetition and ethos to influence the audience and Mr.Gorbachev to tear down the wall. June 12, 1987, in the car in Berlin on the way to the gate and the wall, appeals to pathos by expressing his feelings to Kenneth Duberstein, he was Reagan's White House Chief of Staff. “ the President slapped Duberstein on the knee and said, “The boys at State are going to kill...
Words: 616 - Pages: 3
...President Reagan presents himself as an ordinary person whom everyone can relate to by expressing that he is in pain along with everyone else in the country. In the first paragraph, Reagan says: “Nancy and I are pained to the core by the tragedy of the shuttle Challenger. We know we share this pain with all of the people of our country.” Later in his speech he gives an explanation to the children: “I know it is hard to understand, but sometimes painful things like this happen. It’s all part of the process of exploration and discovery.” President Reagan did a wonderful job relating to his viewers. He was able to touch the hearts of his older viewers while connecting with the children. Reagan evokes the nations painful emotions by using words of comfort that specifically reaches the hearts of the people in grief. When President Reagan said: “For families of the seven, we cannot bear, as you do, the full impact of this tragedy.” This line was crucial because he could only imagine the emotions they are feeling; if he were to say he understood it would likely upset them. Ronald Reagan shortly follows up with: “We feel the loss, and...
Words: 433 - Pages: 2
...When national tragedy strikes in the United States, alarmed and concerned citizens look to their president for guidance. On January 28th, 1986, Space Shuttle Challenger exploded, killing seven astronauts and sending the public into a state of panic. President Ronald W. Reagan addressed the nation on that day, employing the rhetorical strategies of compelling diction and emphatic allusion to achieve his purpose of mourning those lost while still encouraging the spirit of celestial discovery. President Reagan utilizes both positively and negatively connotated words in order to create a sharp contrast in his diction. For example, positively connotated words used throughout his speech include, “brave”, “faith”, “daring”, “courage”, “respect”,...
Words: 600 - Pages: 3
...astronauts. All ages of people around the United States observed this frightening accident, leaving many discouraged and confused. Although these astronauts knew of the many risks involved in space exploration, their deaths still came as shock to all. As President of the United States, Ronald Reagan chose to address the tragedy, honor the fallen heroes, and lift the spirits of the American people. He did so through a powerful speech, which appealed to every citizen through the use of Logos, Pathos, and Ethos. Immediately following the accident, President Ronald Reagan calmly addressed the people of the United States with encouraging words, truly honoring the lost lives and deeply encouraging all people. Following the space shuttle’s unexpected launch result, many people were left discouraged and afraid, needing comfort and reassurance....
Words: 610 - Pages: 3
...Rhetorical Analysis: “The Challenger Address” The rhetorical situation refers to “a situation in which people’s understanding can be changed through messages.” (Zarefsky, 12). The rhetorical situation analysis consists of four elements: audience, occasion, speaker and speech, each assessing the quality of speech. In this essay, I will analyze the rhetorical situation of the historical speech “The Challenger Address” delivered by the 40th president of the United States, Ronald Reagan. Americans had high expectations of the space programs which intended to provide the United States a great sense of achievement. The significance of the space program lies in essence in which symbolized American glory in science and technology. (Lambright) Therefore, the audience of Reagan’s speech was American public; those who had experienced the tragic national loss of seven American astronauts resulted from the failure of space regime. Evidence of Reagan constantly involving American citizens prevail throughout the speech. He specifically engaged the audience by employing words such as “we,” “us,” “schoolchildren of America,” giving the audience a sense of involvement in the national matter. Reagan also acknowledged pain of the families of the seven astronauts. He showed his understanding of pain of families by saying “we feel the loss, and we are thinking about you so very much,” “your loved ones,” which was an attempt to console them by implicitly suggesting that the families are the primary...
Words: 710 - Pages: 3
...Ronald Reagan speech analysis In this assignment I will be examining a speech brought by Ronald Reagan. I will put the speech in the rhetorical pentagon and afterwards analyze it. I will especially focus on Ronald Reagan’s use of language, cause it’s really relevant when it comes to speeches, and also the choise of composition in the speech. The speaker of the speech is of cause Ronald Reagan. Reagan was the 40th president of the United States in the time between 1981 to 1989. He preached this speech in March 1983, at the Annual Convention of the National Convention of the National Association of Evangelicals. As said, the time was 1983, and at this time, the cold war was continuously going on, and the relationship between the Americans and the Soviet Union with its communism were therefore extremely bad, which also reflects in this speech. So the communism is a huge topic in this speech, and Reagan accomplishes to compare America to goodness, while he attacks the Soviets by comparing them to evil. The other major aspect in the speech of Ronald Reagan is about the increase in illegitimate births and abortions involving under aged girls. He mentions the clinics that were established in well-intentioned faith are offering different kind of services to the girls, without their parent even knowing it. He wants to change that, and maximize parental participation. This is the other major aspect of the speech, which of course is being told to the evangelicals of Orlando...
Words: 858 - Pages: 4
...and Peace: Rhetorical Analysis D-Day is recognized as one of the most important events in World War II. It was the turning point of the war as it was a huge victory that marked the beginning of the end of the war. The Allied armies joined together to push the enemy back and free France from their hold. In President Reagan’s speech on the 40th Anniversary of D-Day, he spoke of the tremendous bravery, love, and success the soldiers had that day as well as those before them. President Reagan persuaded the people to continue the fight for freedom, democracy, and peace utilizing pathos, allusion, and repetition. Throughout his speech, Reagan uses pathos to connect and appeal to his audience. Reagan repeatedly uses emotionally charged words and phrases that appeal to the audience by striking pride and sympathy of the soldier’s experience. In that manner, Reagan said, “When one Ranger fell, another would take his place....
Words: 591 - Pages: 3
...EN1420 Understanding Rhetorical Structures Since 2008, the United States economy has been in a recession. The recession has caused many individuals to lose employment, homes, and savings. The economy collapsed due to a variety of reasons of poor finance, lack of regulations, and government legislation. The politicians in Washington have attempted several methods to inject life into the economy. One common practice to boost local and government economies is through taxation. The practice was first introduced through President Ronald Reagan. His idea involved that lowering taxes for wealthy would increase an economy. The purpose of this analysis is to examine a recent article that proposes in today’s era that lowering taxes for the wealthy is not a solution. The article is developed to provide an insight to the different strategies for economic relief. There are a variety of ways our politicians can attempt to stimulate the economy. First, they could lower taxes for everyone. This would in effect give all people a better financial position to spend and boost local economies. Lowering of taxes could also be class targeted. The argument is based on leaving money in the hands of those who will use the money to expand business and increase prosperity, including creating new jobs as stated by (Numbers Don’t Lie, 2012.) President Ronald Reagan is credited with first using this method. During his administration he lowered the taxes on the wealthy. The theory...
Words: 623 - Pages: 3
...A Public Leader Of Course public leaders are held to a different standard then your everyday manager or CEO but they all have some sort of leadership skills and traits involved in how they run their organization or company. Here we take a look at the power team of politics, Hillary and Bill Clinton. Both have held public leadership positions and were held to a certain standard. So we will take a look at the leader and their style as public administrators. Next we will compare the two styles, the effectiveness of their leadership and the impact of their genders as leaders. Then, we will take a look at their strengths and weaknesses and evaluate the effectiveness of their terms as public officials. Finally I will review my own strengths and weakness that would influence my ability to be a public leader. Public Leader Overview The transformational leadership (TL) is when leaders take their vision for the future and excite and motivate others to join in. Often times this vision is developed solely but the leader, but occasionally other levels of management and/or other organizational members. The transformational leader leads through charisma and motivation. Much like a coach, these leader encourage their followers to obtain the ultimate goal; often times through their own beliefs and personal values and strengths. Former president William “Bill” Clinton, fits in to the category of a transformational leader. During his presidency he was credited for having the ability...
Words: 1435 - Pages: 6
...CHARISMATIC LEADERSHIP: STRATEGIES FOR EFFECTING SOCIAL CHANGE C. Marlene Fiol University of Colorado - Denver Drew Harris Fairleigh Dickinson University Robert House University of Pennsylvania Second revision February 1999 Please address all correspondence to: C. Marlene Fiol University of Colorado at Denver College of Business CB 165 PO Box 173364 Denver CO 80217-3364 303-556-5812 mfiol@castle.cudenver.edu CHARISMATIC LEADERSHIP: STRATEGIES FOR EFFECTING SOCIAL CHANGE ABSTRACT Due to their unique relationship with followers, charismatic leaders can be powerful agents of social change. Current theories of charismatic leadership have emphasized primarily the personality and behavior of leaders and their effects on followers, organizations, and society. This emphasis fails to uncover why and how the charismatic leader-follower interaction can generate social change. Our study draws on theories of social meaning to develop a process model of charismatic leadership. Empirical exploration of our model suggests that charismatic leaders employ a set of consistent communication strategies for effecting social change. INTRODUCTION We have substantial evidence that charismatic leaders behave differently than non-charismatic leaders. Further, we know that charismatic leaders can generate radical social changes, and that the performance of charismatic leaders and their followers tends to exceed that...
Words: 9711 - Pages: 39
