Premium Essay

Rule of Thirds

In: English and Literature

Submitted By nick60309
Words 1273
Pages 6
1)
In everyday life, work is still at the center of things; along with love, it is the most important element of a satisfying and happy life.

In ordinary life, the ideal of “meaningful work,” or work that has sufficient scope for self-direction, complexity, and consequential effects to support pride and a sense of purpose, is more relevant than ever.

Few still believe that a different economic and political order can bring a fundamental improvement to the human condition.

Good purposes and fulfilling activities are hard to specify impersonally in any case and any attempt to do so would insult individuals’ freedom to define such things for themselves. In this view, no single ideal of meaningful work could cover the variety of individual tastes and inclinations, nor accommodate the remarkable ability of people to invest their work with meaning even when the work has little to offer in the way of variety, authority, complexity, or social standing.

2) 1)
In everyday life, work is still at the center of things; along with love, it is the most important element of a satisfying and happy life.

In ordinary life, the ideal of “meaningful work,” or work that has sufficient scope for self-direction, complexity, and consequential effects to support pride and a sense of purpose, is more relevant than ever.

Few still believe that a different economic and political order can bring a fundamental improvement to the human condition.

Good purposes and fulfilling activities are hard to specify impersonally in any case and any attempt to do so would insult individuals’ freedom to define such things for themselves. In this view, no single ideal of meaningful work could cover the variety of individual tastes and inclinations, nor accommodate the remarkable ability of people to invest their work with meaning even when the work has little to offer in the way of…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Rules of Law

...1. Rule of Law:Crime: Forgery The false making of a document. 2. Rule of Law:Crime:Larceny Stealing the personal property of another. 3. Rule of Law:Crime:Theft of services Stealing Services. 4. Rule of Law:Crime:Embezzlement Stealing money entrusted to you. 5. Rule of Law:Crime:Extortion Unlawful obtaining money from another. 6. Rule of law:Crime:Vandelism Willful and malicious destruction of the property of others. 7. Rule of law:Crime: Bribary Offering or receiving something of value to influence a person in the performance of an official duty. 8. Rule of law:Crime: R.I.C.O Under the RICO it is a federal crime for any person to use income derived from a pattern of racketeering activity to acquire an interest in a enterprise. 9. Rule of Law: Intentional Torts: Battery A battery is the intentional and harmful or offensive touching of another without consent. 10. Rule of law: Intentional Torts: Assualt Is placing a person in immediate apprehension of one's physical safety. 11. Rule of Law:Intentional Torts: Assault/Battery Defenses o 1. Self defense is defending yourself and a third party using only enough force that is necessary. o 2. Discipline is a parent using enough force that is reasonable and necessary. 12. Rule of Law: Intentional Torts: False Imprisonment:Defense o False imprisonment is the intentional confinement of another person for an appreciable time without consent. o Defense: Consent 13. Rule of law:Intentional Torts: Defamation of......

Words: 988 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Business

...Class 2 Chapter 4 Direct discrimination takes place when an employer adopts a rule which on its face discriminates against people based on one of the many factors listed in human rights codes. For example, a rule like “no Catholics, women or blacks can be employed here” would be an obvious case of direct discrimination. Thankfully, such blatant discrimination is rare. Adverse effect discrimination takes place where, for genuine business reasons, an employer adopts a rule which seems neutral but can have an unfair impact on a particular group of people. For instance, a rule that all employees must work Saturday might seem fair but will adversely affect employees who, for religious reasons, celebrate their Sabbath on Saturday. Systemic discrimination takes place where established procedures of recruitment, hiring and promotion, although neutral on their face, create unnecessary hurdles for some members of society to obtain employment or advancement based on their racial or religious background, among other factors. Class 3 Chapter 4 1. Bona fide occupational requirement 2. Non-profit 3. Ethnic group Bona fide occupational requirement (BFOR) means that the rule establishes a requirement that is necessary for proper or efficient performance of a job. 1. Legitimate concern (purpose) 2. Honest and good faith 3. Rationally connected to the legitimate concern and proved Any rule that is made with the intention of excluding an individual or group will......

Words: 1367 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Analysis of Ethical Dilemma

...one of the professions that demands practitioners to make ethical decisions to avoid messing up their clients and third parties. They are required to employ American Bar Association (ABA) Model Rules of Profession Conduct throughout their professional undertakings. In the paradigm case, Justin King is involved in an accident and this has resulted to lawsuit. The circumstances surrounding the incident call for due diligence from both defendant (Justin) and his legal team. As such, there are various issues affecting this situation. The first issue is whether the ethical duty of confidentiality applies to Justin’s situation. Various laws and regulations govern a lawyer’s conduct. As indicated earlier, ABA Model of Rules of Professional Conduct is a set of principles that governs the conduct of lawyers in their endeavors. To narrow it down, rule 1.6(a) of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Responsibility states, “A lawyer shall not reveal information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation or the disclosure is permitted by paragraph (b).” ABA Model of Prof’l Conduct R. 1.6(a) (2013). However, Rule 1.6 (b) allows the lawyers to reveal information that affect representation of a client provided that they believe it is reasonably necessary. Rule 1.6(b) states that “A lawyer may reveal information relating to the representation of a client to the extent......

Words: 1314 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

History of the Funeral Rule

...HISTORY OF THE FUNERAL RULE The roots of the Funeral Rule are found in two books that were published in the late 60’s - - Unsafe At Any Speed by Ralph Nader and The American Way of Death by Jessica Midford. In the late 1960’s, the FTC was a paper tiger. Ralph Nader, who began the consumer protection movement in this country with the publication of Unsafe At Any Speed, was a sharp critic of the Federal Trade Commission for its lack of consumer protection. Specifically, the FTC was criticized because it relied too heavily on consumer complaints and brought enforcement actions only on a case-by-case basis. The consumer protection movement wanted the FTC to proceed against entire industries rather than individual businesses. The Federal Trade Commission felt it did not have the power to regulate an entire industry. So Congress in the late 60’s and early 70’s gave the FTC trade regulation rulemaking powers. This enabled the FTC to enact regulations that would bind an entire industry. With this power, the FTC set out to transform itself as the nation’s consumer protection watchdog. It hired a group of liberal young lawyers and charged them with identifying industries that were ripe for regulation. Using this power, the FTC enacted trade regulation rules on hearing aids, used cars, eyeglasses, vocational schools, children’s advertising, and funeral service. In early 1972, during an FTC Staff meeting, it was suggested by a staffer who had read Jessica Midford’s book,...

Words: 1230 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The 3d Party Doctrine and Technology

...The Third Party Doctrine: An Unreasonable Method for Determining Unreasonable Fourth Amendment Searches in an Ever Advancing Technological World The Fourth Amendment provides, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Viewed through the specific lens of criminal procedure, there is a long list of jurisprudence that sought to determine the most efficient manner to balance two very important, but competing, interests: the public’s interest in preserving its privacy rights and expectations, and the government’s interest in its ability to investigate and subsequently prosecute criminals. However, the methods and rules previously established have yet to be fully tested in our ever-evolving world of technological advances. This raises the question of whether certain well-established rules, specifically the Third-Party Doctrine, are ill-suited to address modern issues. As it has been applied since 1979, and in the absence of reevaluation, the Third-Party Doctrine is likely to impede, severely, on the privacies guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment. In order to fully understand the gravity of this predicament, the evolution of Fourth Amendment analysis must also be understood. In 1949, the Court...

Words: 1297 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Joinder of Claims

...Federal Rules of Civil Procedure contemplate lawsuits in which the party structure is more complex than the “A v. B” lawsuit. *Joinder Rules such as FRCP 14, 18, and 20 are rules of pleading – they specify the kinds of party and claim structures that are permitted in litigation in federal court. However, these rules don’t purport to control the subject matter jurisdiction of the federal courts – just because these rules permit a plaintiff to bring two different claims against a defendant does not tell us anything about whether there is federal jurisdiction over either or both claims in the case. -FRCP 18: Joinder of Claims -permits a plaintiff to bring more than one claim against a defendant – governs the joinder of claims, not parties -without FRCP 18, plaintiff wouldn’t be permitted to do this – under common law rules of procedure (prior to adoption of FRCP), such simple things as bringing two claims against one defendant were difficult if not impossible to do -Example: Counterclaims, FRCP 13 -allows a defendant, who has been sued by the plaintiff, to assert a claim for relief against the plaintiff -a counterclaim is not a defense (“I didn’t do it”) but a claim for relief in its own right (“you owe me money for negligently injuring me”) -when a defendant asserts a counterclaim against the plaintiff, we now have at least two claims in the case – one by the plaintiff against the defendant, and one by the defendant against the plaintiff -Example: “third......

Words: 1424 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Coursework

...Salford Law - Salford Business School Assessment 1 Module leader: Mr. Donal Loftus Module title &module code: | Contract Law 35587 | Level 4Erasmus program | Title of assignment | In Contract law, how far do you agree with the claim that the traditional rules of consideration have been relaxed in order to maintain effective business relationships? | Programmes undertaking the assignment | LLB (Hons) Law | Pupil | Juan López MartínezID: 004426895 | Hand-in date | Friday November 06th 2015 | INTRODUCTION First of all, the definition of Consideration is going to be stated. Consideration is an essential fact in the elaboration of a contract. It may consist of a promise to perform a desired action or a vow to abstain from doing any act that one has the legal right to do. A bilateral contract is an agreement by which both parties exchange mutual promises, every promise is considered to be sufficient consideration for the other. On the other hand, a unilateral contract is an agreement by which one party makes a promise in base of obtaining something in return from the other part. This ‘something in return’ is the consideration of the promise, and the promise is the consideration of the performance. Namely, this is the promise of a promise or promise made in return for a particular action. There’s going to be consideration if the price is being offered to the other party. An Orthodox way to define consideration is based on the idea of reciprocity,......

Words: 2326 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Federalist Paper 10 by James Madison

...majority and minority factions and solutions to lessen the dangers of these factions. When our goverment first started it was made originally to help and be closely tied to the citizens of the United States. Some aspects of this has changed since the beginning of the constitution resulting in some majority and minority rule change. When the Consititution was first written it was made to simply limit majority rule and give eqaul amount of power to the minority. The national goverment was originally built closely tied to citizens because of the House of Repesentatives. The House of Representatives was made to give citizens an equal say in the legislation of the United States. Unlike in the Senate, members of the House are elected by the people of the United States giving citizens a say in govenment affairs. One of the major aspects of the national goverment that is tied to citizens is the short term lenght and frequency of elections of people holding an office in the goverment. With the short term lenght and frequency of elections citizens are constantly contributing to what is going on in the nation by voting on who will be the best candidate for a certain office. A third reason the national goverment is closely tied to citizens is that the House of Representatives represents small member districts. This causes there to be close to equal say for everyone in a state to elect someone to represent thier ideas and views without on group of people having an uneqaul say. The......

Words: 940 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Commerical Law Exam 1

...writing THE EQUAL DIGNITY RULE In most states, the equal dignity rule requires that if the contract being executed is or must be in writing, then the agent’s authority must also be in writing. POWER OF ATTORNEY Giving an agent a power of attorney confers express authority An agent has the implied authority to do what is reasonably necessary to carry out express authority and accomplish the objectives of the agency An agent has apparent authority when the principal, by either word or action, causes a third party reasonably to believe that the agent has authority to act, even though the agent has no express or implied authority(a pattern of conduct) APPARENT AUTHORITY AND ESTOPPEL The doctrine of agency by estoppel (introduced in Chapter 32) may be applied in situations in which a principal has given a third party reason to believe that an agent has authority to act. If When an unforeseen emergency demands action by the agent to protect or preserve the property and rights of the principal, but the agent is unable to communicate with the principal, the agent has emergency power. Ratifi cation occurs when the principal affi rms, or accepts responsibility for, an agent’s unauthorized act. 2. Know the third party contract liability of a principal when his status is undisclosed, partially disclosed, and fully disclosed. When is the agent also liable on the contract? disclosed principal is a principal whose identity is known by the third party at the......

Words: 2988 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Law on Partnership

...mutual CONFIDENCE and TRUSTS 6. NEW PERSONALITY  the object must be for profit and not merely for the common enjoyment otherwise only a co-ownership has been formed. HOWEVER, pecuniary profit need not be the only aim, it is enough that it is the principal purpose BUSINESS TRUSTS  when certain persons entrust their property or money to others who will manage the same for the former RULES ON CAPACITY TO BECOME A PARTNER 1. a person capacitated to enter into contractual relations may become a partner 2. an UNEMANCIPATED MINOR CANNOT become a partner UNLESS his parent or guardian consents 3. a MARRIED WOMAN, cannot contribute conjugal funds as her contribution to the partnership UNLESS she is permitted to do so by her husband OR UNLESS she is the administrator of the conjugal partnership, in which the COURT must give its consent authority 4. a PARTNERSHIP being a juridical person by itself can form another partnership 5. a CORPORATION cannot become a partner on grounds of public policy  a partner shares not only in profits but also in the losses of the firm RULE:  the partnership has a PERSONALITY SEPARATE and DISTINCT from that of each partner CONSEQUENCES OF THE PARTNERSHIP BEING A JURIDICAL ENTITY 1. its juridical personality is SEPARATE and DISTINCT from that of each partner 2. the partnership CAN in GENERAL: A) acquire and possess property of all kinds B) incur obligations C) bring civil and criminal actions D) can be......

Words: 8779 - Pages: 36

Premium Essay

Agency Law

... * What is an agent? * The primary function of an agent is to make contracts on behalf of the principal  If the party wishes to sue, they must sue the principal and not the agent: International Harvester Co of Australia Pty Ltd v Carrigan’s Hazeldene Pastoral Co (1958) * Indicators of an agency relationship: * Does the 'agent' keep the profits it makes or does it have to pay them across to the principal? * Is the ‘agent’ paid a commission? o Does the ‘agent’ have an obligation to account to the principal for sales? * Potter v Customs and Excise Commissioners [1985] Functions of an agent: * Most common function: to bring about a contractual relationship between the principal and a third party * A person who has no authority to make contracts on behalf of his/her principal may be an agent if he/she has authority to: o receive money on behalf of principal o pay money on behalf of principal * make representations for which principal is responsible o receive representations on behalf of principal o Petersen v Moloney (1951) 25 ALJR 566 (High Court) Common commercial relationships in agency: * Employer/Employee: not all employees are agents because not all employees have the authority to affect their employer’s legal position with respect to 3rd parties. * Independent contractor: may be an agent with wide authority, limited authority or not an agent at all: Perpetual trustees Vic Ltd v Ford......

Words: 1486 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Law on Partnerships

...TRUSTS 6. NEW PERSONALITY ( the object must be for profit and not merely for the common enjoyment otherwise only a co-ownership has been formed. HOWEVER, pecuniary profit need not be the only aim, it is enough that it is the principal purpose BUSINESS TRUSTS ( when certain persons entrust their property or money to others who will manage the same for the former RULES ON CAPACITY TO BECOME A PARTNER 1. a person capacitated to enter into contractual relations may become a partner 2. an UNEMANCIPATED MINOR CANNOT become a partner UNLESS his parent or guardian consents 3. a MARRIED WOMAN, cannot contribute conjugal funds as her contribution to the partnership UNLESS she is permitted to do so by her husband OR UNLESS she is the administrator of the conjugal partnership, in which the COURT must give its consent authority 4. a PARTNERSHIP being a juridical person by itself can form another partnership 5. a CORPORATION cannot become a partner on grounds of public policy ( a partner shares not only in profits but also in the losses of the firm RULE: ( the partnership has a PERSONALITY SEPARATE and DISTINCT from that of each partner CONSEQUENCES OF THE PARTNERSHIP BEING A JURIDICAL ENTITY 1. its juridical personality is SEPARATE and DISTINCT from that of each partner 2. the partnership CAN in GENERAL: A) acquire and possess property of all kinds B) incur obligations ......

Words: 8589 - Pages: 35

Premium Essay

Exercise 1: Heirs to an Estate

...adequate preparation (Carrell, Heavrin, 2007). Skill 2-2: Should you propose the three of you begin negotiation by adopting ground rules that address the “5 Ws”? Also consider the setting –where should you meet? Ground rules are the rules of conduct defined to resolve conflict in a process such as negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or consensus-building. Ground rules also made so that each party listed each other views carefully and they must treat each other with respect and Honor. Ground rules also defined about which topic should be discussed and which not (Ground rules are the rules of conduct…, n.d.). Adaptation of ground rules makes negotiation more effective and smooth. If at the later stages of negotiation something goes odd then we can point out on the ground rules that might me violated (A negotiation goes more smoothly if…, n.d.). Generally 5W’s of negation process defined as: Who: which means; who will speak on behalf of each party and how many people should be included in negotiation? What: which means; what kind of agreement should be made? Where: which means; where should party meet for negotiation? When: which means; defining day and time frame of each meeting. How will: which means; how the final proposal be made and issue be presented (Carrell, Heavrin, 2007). In my opinion we should start our negotiation by adopting ground rules that addresses 5W’s. These 5W’s will help us in answering lots of questions in our mind and make negotiation easier......

Words: 1898 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Just War Theory Applied to Pearl Harbor

...Aquinas’s just war theory can be applied to modern armed conflicts today. Using the attack on Pearl Harbor as an example you can still apply these ancient ideas to provide a useful way to look at events. The just war theory states three rules for a just war. First, a proper authority must command the war. Those in authority are supposed to protect the people. It is lawful for them to use weapons or force to keep peace and order inside their city/country and to punish people who break the laws and do evil. In the same way, those in authority are responsible for defending the community against external enemies, and can therefore use force against enemies. Second, there must be a just cause for the war. “… Those who are attacked, should be attacked because they deserve it on account of some fault.” Third, those fighting must “have a rightful intention, so that they intend the advancement of good, or the avoidance of evil.” The first rule is clearly the most important rule; it sets the tone for everything that follows. A state may launch a war only for the right reason. A just cause most frequently mentioned includes self-defense from external attack. Thus far, Pearl Harbor could be considered a just war because the United States declared a state of war with Japan after they were “suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan.” as stated by President Franklin Roosevelt in his “Day of Infamy Speech”. However, we must remember how morally......

Words: 794 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Chapter 1 Reviewer

... * I do that you may give * I do that you may do Rules governing innominate contracts * The agreement of the parties * Provisions of the Civil Code on obligations and contracts * Rules governing the most analogous contracts * Customs of the place Persons affected by the contract * General rule * Exceptions * By their nature * By stipulation * By provision of law Cases when strangers or third persons affected by a contract * Contracts containing a stipulation in favour of a third person * Contracts creating real rights * Contracts entered into to defraud creditors * Contracts which have been violated at the inducement of a third person Classes of stipulation pour autrui * Those where the stipulation is intended for the sole benefit of such person * Those where an obligation is due from the promise to the third person which the former seeks to discharge by means of such stipulation, as, for instance, where a transfer of property is coupled with the purchaser’s promise to pay a debt owing from the seller to a third person. Requisites of stipulation pour autrui * Contracting parties by their stipulation must have clearly and deliberately conferred a favour upon a third person * Third person must have communicated his acceptance to the obligor before its revocation by the obligee or the original parties * the stipulation in favour of the third person should be a part, not a whole, of the contract ...

Words: 1209 - Pages: 5