...California should not spend the money for the San Joaquin Restoration Project. Bill McEwen’s article, River Plan Too Fishy for my Taste Buds, clearly states his opinion on the controversial topic of the San Joaquin Restoration Project. The newspaper, Fresno Bee, published this article on March 26 in 2009 in Fresno, California when congress officially approved of the San Joaquin project. Due to the fact that farms surround Fresno, the people who live there consist mostly of farmers, and the majority of them do not agree with the river project. Bill McEwen, a local Fresno, proves as a credible source because he worked as a writer at The Fresno Bee for 35 years. I believe the river restoration project might head towards a disadvantageous direction...
Words: 1504 - Pages: 7
...In class we read two articles about the San Joaquin River Restoration Project , a project that will cost the federal and state governments millions if not billions of dollars to complete and to put salmon back into the river.One written by Bill McEwen in the Fresno Bee Newspaper called “River Plan Too Fishy for my Taste Buds” caught my attention the most. The way that the author brought up every aspect to go against it and had strong enough evidence to support his reasoning on the restoration being a waste of money because studies show that it will be unsuccessful (logos), as well as having many farmers and people losing water for this project (pathos)and since institution say that success is impossible( ethos) it’s most likely a be a mistake...
Words: 967 - Pages: 4
...The san joaquin river restoration project is a project trying to restore the once energetic river where families went to go swim and fish. They need biology scientists and many other tools and time to do this restoration to the point where there's many people against the idea. The debate of the two articles between River Plan To Fishy for my Taste Buds by Bill McEwen In Fresno Bee and River Restoration Project Offers a sprinkling of Hope by Daniel Weintraub in sacramento bee. McEwen basically states that its a waste of time, and money while Weintraub says the River restoration is a good project to revive the once thriving river. Bill McEwen has worked for the fresno bee for 35 years with a reputation of an outstanding working person. Daniel Weintraub sacramento Bee for 15 years , a blogger , and a reporter and also writes for three popular newspapers like La times, sacramento bee, and Orange Country and even works on CNN. While McEwen can't be trusted Weintraub can. I agree with Weintraub and I think that the river restoration project should be passed and started. I believe that the San Joaquin River project was worth the 400 million...
Words: 834 - Pages: 4
...to use and how long it is going to last us. Weintraub, author of the article,”River Restoration Project Offers a Sprinkling of Hope”, argues that the San Joaquin River Restoration Project is a positive and benefiting project. On the other hand McEwen, author of the article, “River Plan Too Fishy For my Taste Buds”, argues that is is not so good, nothing worth celebrating over and won’t help. So the question is, is it worth it to have spent almost half a billion dollars on the San Joaquin River Restoration Project? I believe...
Words: 790 - Pages: 4
...There has been an ongoing debate whether or not Californians should pursue the San Joaquin River Restoration Project. The project itself is an effort to restore flows to the San Joaquin River from Friant Dam to the confluence of Merced River. I believe Bill McEwen’s, author of the “River plan to fishy for my taste buds” article, experience prove him to be the better expert because he’s a veteran journalist who speaks for people in many of his published works and also works for a democrat which makes him more trustworthy on his environmental points. The article was published on Fresno city’s “Fresno Bee” newspaper. People who live in this city seek for a change to be provided with more water. I believe the San Joaquin Restoration Project is...
Words: 676 - Pages: 3
...California should not spend the money for the San Joaquin Restoration Project. Bill McEwen’s article, River Plan Too Fishy for my Taste Buds, clearly states his opinion on the controversial topic of the San Joaquin Restoration Project. The newspaper, Fresno Bee, published this article on March 26 of 2009 in Fresno, California when congress officially approved of the San Joaquin project. Due to the fact that farms surround Fresno, the people who live there consist mostly of farmers, and they do not agree with the river project. Bill McEwen, a local Fresno, proves as a credible source because he worked as a writer at The Fresno Bee for 35 years. I believe the river restoration project might head towards disadvantageous direction because, as stated...
Words: 1487 - Pages: 6
...The San Joaquin river project was created because the river had dried up and fishes and salmon couldn’t swim so they had a plan to spend $400 dollars to build the river for the salmon and fishes can swim again in the new river, they are going to build for the animals so they can swim freely.Mr.McEwen, who is a 35 year with the Fresno Bee.He is an opinion page editor and he's retiring.Director for Rep.Jim Costa a Fresno democrat. he grew up in Fresno and graduated from fresno 1972.He is going to work for the state of California. The “river plan too fishy for my taste buds”article was published in the “fresno Bee.” the new paper is well known for its news and sport sections there's the typical information and sport seekers reading.I believe the STRP is a waste of money, especially $400 several experts and famous institution say Its success is impossible numerous studies prove this project will fail and many farmers and people will be...
Words: 596 - Pages: 3
...I concur with Bill McEwen’s article “ River Plan Too Fishy for my Taste Buds” on the San Joaquin River Restoration Program. The San Joaquin River Restoration Program (SJRRP) planned on restoring the water flow to San Joaquin River from Friant Dam and its convergence with the Merced River, and revitalize the Chinook Salmon. McEwen has a much more superior expertise due to his 35 year career at Fresno Bee. He has become one of the papers biggest illustrious personalities as a sports and news columnist and opinion page editor.With an extremely further experience in the journaling world, it has won him an award-winning in reporting and he has a deep understanding of Fresno politics. His article was published in the Fresno Bee, located in Fresno,...
Words: 692 - Pages: 3
...disappointment to many special water landmarks, one including the San Joaquin River. In the article, “ River Restoration Projects Offers a Sprinkling of Hope”, the author Daniel Weintraub explains why bringing back the San Joaquin River would be a good idea. On the other hand, author Bill McEwen wrote an article called the Fresno Bee claiming the project was a waste of time and money, all in all, declared it was not a good idea. I chose this article because i believe that the River Rights Project would help enable farms along the river, being said that money is set aside for this event to take place. Daniel Weintraub’s achievements, credentials, and experience manifest him to be more educated, as well as his...
Words: 902 - Pages: 4
...I choose the article “River Restoration Project Offers a Sprinkling of Hope” by Daniel Weintraub because it contains credible information about the river plan. The author is an expert that has a lot of experience. He is a blogger, has a degree in economics and is a journalist currently. He has also worked and reported for the government. I believe that the SJRP was worth the 400 million dollars because of the experts that supported the San Joaquin River project. The numerous studies that prove it would work and help California explained that it can be really helpful and benefit everyone. It is a positive impact that this project will have on people emotionally by giving them hope for the future. I strongly agree with the California water...
Words: 413 - Pages: 2
...Within the article, “River Plan: Too Fishy for my Taste Buds”, its author Bill McEwen writes about the plan to restore the San Joaquin River, and about the details that seem to create more negative effects than positive effects. This author appears to be more credible, as he gives a wider view of the situation than merely who approves of the idea. He gives details of how the restoration idea would ruin what little river remains, and become a drowning waste of money. McEwen worked with the Fresno Bee for over 35 years, writing multiple articles and having a heavy understanding of politics that other writers do not. The Fresno Bee pulls in an average of 264,603 daily readers, and publishing occurs in the California city of Fresno. Fresno itself...
Words: 1297 - Pages: 6
...In the spring of 2009, the people of Fresno disagreed on whether they should restore the San Joaquin River in hopes of bringing back the Chinook salmon or not. Fresno is the fifth largest city in California and the San Joaquin river passes through the northern part of Fresno. There are some pros that come along with restoring the river, like increasing the population of the Chinook salmon, but the cons outweigh the pros. The Fresno Bee is a news source for the 510,000 people that live in Fresno and during March of 2009, they published Bill McEwen’s article, “River Plan Too Fishy for my Tastebuds”. McEwen’s intention in writing the article was to inform the people of Fresno that people need to appear as more relevant than the salmon, and they...
Words: 309 - Pages: 2
...Will the San Joaquin River Restoration Project persists of improving or deteriorating California’s drought? “River Plan Too Fishy for my Taste Buds” explains how the project will not help at all, something fishy must remain a secret. Bill McEwen publishes this article in The Fresno Bee, located in Fresno, because he believes the project subsists unhelpful. Fresno transpires as one of the fastest growing population county, and they accustomed to obtaining high temperatures. McEwen, a journalist, acquired a position in The Fresno Bee for 35 years. in addition, he dedicated four decades of all his knowledge to his community. McEwen, 1972 Fresno High graduate, attended Fresno State and majored in Journalism. I believe the San Joaquin River...
Words: 1068 - Pages: 5
...The San Joaquin River is the backbone of the San Joaquin Valley. The San Joaquin was not only the nation's more agricultural area, but it is also one of the best in the country. Once it was a magnificent 350 miles long, it is one of the nation's ten most endangered rivers. The river once flowed with enough water to support steam ships and a salmon migration it now goes completely dry.The article, River Plan Too Fishy for my Taste Buds by Bill McEwen was chosen to represent facts on the San Joaquin River plan. Bill McEwen wrote the article, after doing a background on him the audience can take into consideration that because of his 35 year career as a veteran journalist and his giant leap from newspapers to politics. These facts illustrate to...
Words: 1060 - Pages: 5
...The San Joaquin river, one of the most famous and longest river in all of Central California. The river starts in Nevada and goes through a big agricultural farm, then all the way to the Pacific Ocean, San Francisco, and Suisun Bay. In the 20th century the river came to a major halt the people voted to have the delta built, which caused an uproar in the wildlife community.Since the river has been closed off from flowing, the waters just sitting there and all wildlife that took place there packed their things and moved to a new location. The article “ River To Fishy For My Taste Buds by Bill McEwen” of the Fresno Bee's newspaper company, whose credibility for the topic occurs as credible. McEwen despite the fact that he agrees in the river to...
Words: 1205 - Pages: 5
