Premium Essay

Search and Seizure

In: Other Topics

Submitted By jgillum
Words 1209
Pages 5
Search and Seizure

When it comes to Search and Seizure, allot of people think that law enforcement should not be allowed to search or seize property. I have heard many arguments against this subject, people stating that law enforcement officers go too far or have no right to search someone’s property such as their vehicle. Probable cause is more than a reasonable suspicion it requires that a combination of facts makes it more likely than not that items sought are where police believe them to be. In addition to establishing probable cause for a search, a warrant must contain the reasons for obtaining it, the names of people presenting the affidavits, what is specifically being sought and the signature of the judge issuing it.
Search and seizure is the process used by law enforcement officers, who suspect that a crime is being or has been committed. Law enforcement officers search a person’s property and confiscate any evidence related to the crime. In situations where it would be unreasonable for a person to expect privacy, there is no search to justify, so no warrant is needed.
Law enforcement officers make may kinds if searches, from crime scenes, suspects, dead bodies, vehicles, hotel rooms, apartments, homes and offices. Searching is a very important task in most criminal investigations because of the evidence that can be obtained. Probable cause is more than a reasonable suspicion it requires that a combination of facts makes it more than likely than not that items sought are where police believe them to be.
Searching without a warrant is allowed if consent is given by the actual property owner or by a person in charge of the property. Consent to search must be voluntary and the search must be limited to the area for which consent is given. Another exception to the warrant requirement is a stop and frisk situation. Two situations require police officers...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Search and Seizure

...Search and seizure is when a law enforcement/gov. agent looks for evidence in a manner that intrudes into a persons legally protected zone of Privacy. These agents then take possession or control of the property or persons. ( Scheb, 2012) The 4th Amendment puts legal limitations on search and seizure and protects against unlawful search and seizure. The 4th Amendment states: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. The 4th Amendment requires law enforcement officers to get a warrant before conducting search and seizures. In order for the officer to get such warrant he/she must have probable cause. This means that the officer must believe that the search will produce evidence of a crime. (Scheb, 2012) There are a few different types of consent when it comes to search and seizure. Consent to search is when a suspect/ person voluntary allows an officer of the law to search his/her car, home, bag, or whatever it may be. Then there is implied consent, which is when and officer is called to a specific location where a crime has been committed. This is a given that the officer is going to search the area where the crime has been committed....

Words: 454 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Search and Seizure

...Search and Seizure Louisa Barnes CJ333: Constitutional Law March 16, 2014 Erin Shriver SEARCH AND SEIZURE Constitutional Search The high school students were throwing a party that created so much noise that a noise complaint was lodged with the police by a neighbor. This gave the police the right to enter onto the property to investigate the complaint. Once they arrived at the residence and started talking to the party goers they smelled marijuana on the individuals. Because of the reasonable suspicion and probable cause that criminal activity was taking place they had a right to search the premises. This is found in the Fourth Amendment under Probable Cause and Reasonable Suspicion (Farlex, Inc., 2014).To protect evidence from being destroyed they also had a need for the search of the premises. To protect themselves as well as possible evidence they were also permitted to frisk the individuals that were out on the porch of the house. This exercise is permitted when they have reasonable suspicion that a criminal activity is taking place (Daniel E. Hall, 2012, pp. 509-510). While frisking the individuals a bag of marijuana was found. This led the police officers to then call for backup for searching the house before evidence inside the property could be destroyed before a warrant could be obtained. While waiting on the backup they proceeded to search the remaining individuals inside the home, again to keep themselves safe....

Words: 1268 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Search & Seizure

...Search & Seizure A police officer is dispatched to a call in his jurisdiction for a noise complaint. The police officer arrives hearing very loud music coming from the residence which violates a noise ordinance. The police officer knocks on the front door with no answer so he proceeds to the back door to knock when he observes what appears to be marijuana plants based on his training and experience. The police officer can seize the marijuana plants based on the Plain View Doctrine. “In Harris v. United States (1968), the Supreme Court ruled that anything a police officer sees in plain view, when the officer has a right to be where he or she is, is not the product of a search and is therefore admissible as evidence.” [1] The police officer is legally in a place in which he should be because of the noise complaint call. The police officer recognized the marijuana plants as contraband and has the right to seize them without a search warrant. “How is it then, brethren? when ye come together, every one of you hath a psalm, hath a doctrine, hath a tongue, has an interpretation. Let all things be done unto edifying.”[2] The police officer needs to obtain a search warrant in order to search the rest of the residence. With no exception present, the police officer would be violating the resident’s Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure if he conducted a full search of the residence without a search warrant....

Words: 696 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Search and Seizures

...In cases of searches by off duty officers depends on the circumstance of the search is whether it is just a search or if it turns out to be a...

Words: 591 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Search and Seizure

...Search and Seizure in America CJA/364 February 10, 2015 Search and Seizure in America The fourth amendment has given us the protection against unreasonable search and seizure but what exactly does that mean? To understand, one must define right of privacy, search, seizure, arrest, and reasonableness and how each of these relates to stop and frisk, automotive search rules, and requirements regarding border and regulatory searches. Have you ever been stopped on the street or anywhere and frisked by a police officer? Individuals should be aware of the rules regarding such a situation. In the state of New York, the people, "Mayor Michael Bloomberg" (Wells 2013, p. 1) and the district court judge "Shira Scheindlin" (Wells 2013) argued about reforming the stop and frisk policy. The objective issues in improving system addressed after a stop and frisk case won by the arrestee. In the case involving the arrestee "David Ourlicht" (Whitaker, 2013, p. 1) claimed he was wrongfully stopped and frisked. The officer stopped and frisked the defendant because the object in his pocket resembled a gun. The attorney representing the defendant argued his constitutional rights, and the stop and frisk was unconstitutional. The environment of the Missouri cities, counties, suburbs, and rural area are subject to society socialization, private activity, and deviant behavior which may cause the proper authority to respond to the nature of the action the same as in New York City....

Words: 1651 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Search and Seizure

...Wilson April 22, 2014 Search and Seizure Response Paper I believe that the courts have put in place certain safeguards and limitations that ensure police officers do not interfere with an individual's Fourth Amendment rights. I could go into how search and seizure is defined and what is necessary for a warrant, but I want to go into a different direction and discuss how technology is changing the meaning of ; "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." These few words are meant to guarantee every person in the United States two basic liberties; the right to privacy and freedom from arbitrary intrusions. With advances in new technology, the phrase " unreasonable searches has become somewhat blurred. In Katz v United States, the Supreme Court ruled that although Katz was in a public venue (i.e. a phone booth with the door closed), he still had a reasonable expectation of privacy. This was the Supreme Court's attempt to make the Fourth Amendment adaptive to the changing surveillance technology....

Words: 523 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Search and Seizure of Cell Phone

...Search and Seizure of Cell Phone Courtney Henry COMM/215 12 May 2014 Virginia Stewart Search and Seizure of Cell Phone It is in the best interest of everyone not to have their cell phone search and seize during a routine traffic stop or when arrested. Although the police may or may not have probable cause, that shouldn’t give the police the right to search and seize your phone without a warrant. It is in the best interest of everyone because your Fourth Amendment right is being violated and your privacy is being taking away from you. Your cell phone should be considered as your property as stated in the fourth amendment, which cannot be searched without a warrant. Your cell phone contains a lot of sensitive information such as banking information, medical records, personal photos, videos, names of friends, and associates that you wouldn’t want for anyone else to know. Even if an arrest is being made for a major traffic violation such as DWI, excessive speeding, driving reckless, or the suspicion of a crime, a police offer should produce a warrant to justify the search and seizure of your cell phone. Probable Cause During a routine traffic stop, a police officer has a lot of power to their discretion. If they pull you over for speeding, not wearing your seat belt, having expired tags or a blown taillight, they may give you a ticket or give you a warning....

Words: 1312 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Warrantless Search and Seizure Memoranda

...Linda Barron-Gronvold CCJS 234-Criminal Procedure and Evidence September 17, 2013 Warrantless Search & Seizure Memorandum To: Judge M. Pearson From: Linda Barron-Gronvold Re: Elliott Watson case – Marijuana Possession with Intent to Distribute Prosecution Date: September 17, 2013 Brief Summary: Elliott Watson was arrested for the possession of marijuana with the intent to distribute said illegal drug. Elliott Watson was stopped by Officer Timothy Johnson because of faulty mechanical problems of Elliot Watson’s vehicle, which was sputtering and stalling out, and the vehicle also fit the description of a vehicle, a sports coupe, that had earlier, was used to kidnap a three year old young girl, Wanda Jones, from her home. Based on the description of the kidnapping victims’ vehicle description and the kidnappers clothing and the vehicle mechanical problems of Mr. Watson’s vehicle, a Fiat sports coupe and clothing which fit the description of the kidnappers clothing as well, Johnson pulled vehicle over for a police “car stop”, based on the fact that Mr. Watsons’ Fiat Sports Coupe fit the minimal description of a vehicle used in a three year old child kidnapping that happened at 3: 00 A.M., Officer Timothy Johnson was patrolling the area where the kidnapping occurred and noticed that a Fiat Sports Coupe car was having mechanical difficulties: stuttering and stalling....

Words: 1315 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Fourth Amendment Search and Seizure

...The Fourth Amendment protects us from unreasonable search or seizure. People have the right to confront witnesses and accusers. Nothing can change these rights unless the U.S. constitutions were to be rewritten and that is not likely to happen. In this paper we will be examining the Fourth Amendment, learning the requirements for obtaining a search warrant, defining probable cause, describing when search and seizure does not require a warrant. We will also explain the rationale for allowing warrantless searches, examine the persuasiveness of these reasons, and determine if probable cause is always necessary to conduct a search. Fourth Amendment Search and Seizure The Fourth Amendment guarantees “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches or seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Schmalleger,F., 2012). This means the police cannot just barge into your home without proper authority and reason for the purpose of a search as this would be unreasonable. The law enforcement agent therefore must seek a warrant. A search warrant is ordered by a judge, magistrate, or the Supreme Court....

Words: 1026 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Brief Re Illegal Search and Seizure

...NO. 11-10101 CALIFORNIA COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE THIRD DISTRICT ______________________ THE PEOPLE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, V. ERNEST WRONG, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. ______________________ ON APPEAL FROM THE SACRAMENTO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DOCKET NUMBER: 12F06555 ______________________ RESPONSE BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE ______________________ Pre-Law Major REPRESENTING THE PEOPLE 2500 Someother Way, Suite 401 Sacramento, California 93721 Telephone: (916) 497-4000 Attorneys for Appellee TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... i Table of Authorities ................................................................................................ ii Issues Presented for Review ................................................................................... 1 Statement of the Case ............................................................................................. 1 Statement of Facts .................................................................................................. 1 Summary of Argument ........................................................................................... 3 Argument ................................................................................................................ 4 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 6 i TABLE OF......

Words: 1504 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

The Internet: an Unrestrained Accomplice in Unlawful Search and Seizure

...The Internet: An Unrestrained Accomplice in Unlawful Search and Seizure Word Count: 3,205 How would you feel if someone that had never met you and had never seen your face was able to tell you that your favorite movies were “50 First Dates, 10 Things I Hate About You, and The Princess Bride,” and that you “browse entertainment news and like to take quizzes” (Angwin, 2010). Would you feel your privacy had been sbreached because someone must have spied on you without your knowledge? That is what happened to Ashley Hayes-Beaty. “Miss Hayes-Beaty is being monitored by Lotame Solutions Inc., a New York company that uses sophisticated software called ‘beacon’ to capture what people are typing on a website” (Angwin, 2010). According to PCWorld Magazine (Sullivan, 2012), personal web habits are being tracked by companies such as Lotame Inc. and Facebook, advertisers, and corporations that “stalk” consumers on the web, and then sold to marketers and the government without web users being informed or aware of it. People like Ashley are suing data brokers that “sold consumer profiles to other companies without taking steps required under the U.S. Fair Credit Reporting Act to protect consumers” (Gross, 2012). Digital consumer monitoring is a breach of privacy that needs to be addressed. Personal data is being collected and sold without consumer consent, and the current regulatory environment is weak....

Words: 4209 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

The Fourth Amendment

...The text of the Fourth Amendment appears seemingly straightforward; the first clause of the amendment states that all searches and seizures must be reasonable, the second clause of the amendment specifies requirements for when courts may issue a warrant in support of a search or seizure.2 Surprisingly, the concept that warrantless searches and seizures are unconstitutional or that warrants are required for all searches and seizures is relatively modern. Prior to this mindset of warrantless search and seizures being unconstitutional, law enforcement was allowed to do a search and seize items as long as their actions could be construed as being reasonable. In the event that the searches and seizures were unreasonable, the law enforcement officers would be held accountable for their actions in the form of being liable for damages suffered from the trespass in addition to punitive damages.3 This potential liability often served as a deterrent for law enforcement not to abuse its power, as there was the looming fear of liability. According to Yale Law School professor Akhil...

Words: 703 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Unit 4 Assignment

...Assignment Unit 4 Candace House CJ140 March 26, 2013 Assignment Unit 4 There are two legal terms “search” and “seizure”. The legal term search means to examine another's premises to look for evidence of criminal activity. Under the 4th and 14th Amendments it is unconstitutional for law enforcement officers to conduct a search without a "search warrant" issued by a judge or without facts which give the officer "probable cause" to believe evidence of a specific crime is on the premises if there is not enough time to obtain a search warrant. The legal term seizure means the taking by law enforcement officers of potential evidence in a criminal case. The constitutional limitations on seizure are the same as for search. Thus, evidence seized without a search warrant or without "probable cause" to believe a crime has been committed and without time to get a search warrant, cannot be admitted in court, nor can evidence traced through the illegal seizure. Basically what all this means is that when evidence is being collected in a search and seizure it has to be done by protocol otherwise the criminal may walk free. An element that is needed with both the terms search and seizure is probable cause. Without the probable cause then we cannot legally search a person or their property and take any evidence. Search warrants may also be needed, provided that there is enough time to obtain a search warrant....

Words: 622 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Study Sheet for Police Academy

...Study Sheet Unit 3.1 Constitutional Law 1. Identify the purpose of the Constitution of the State of Nevada. 2. State the purpose of the Bill of Rights 3. State the purpose of the First Amendment 4. State the purpose of the Second Amendment 5. State the purpose of the Fourth Amendment 6. State the purpose of the Fifth Amendment 7. State the purpose of the Sixth Amendment 8. State the purpose of the Eighth Amendment 9. Explain the purpose of the 14th Amendment as it relates to the Bill of Rights. 10. List the two pertinent clauses in the 14th Amendment as they relate to Police. 11. Explain the affect the 14th amendment has on citizenship. Unit 3-2 Criminal Law 1 1. Explain difference between criminal and tort law 2. Define the term “Law” 3. Define the term “Statute” 4. Define the term “Crime” 5. Differentiate the various classifications of crime per NRS 193.120 6. Identify the Various courts having jurisdiction in Nevada 7. Differentiate between NRS and County/City Ordinance 8. Demonstrate how to use the Nevada Revised Statues (NRS) to locate various crimes 9. State the elements of NRS 193.190 (to constitute crime there must be unity of act and intent) 10. State the elements of NRS 193.200 (Intent) 11. State the elements of NRS 193.210 (When person considered to be of sound mind) 12. Identify who is capable of committing a crime pursuant to NRS 194.010 13. State the elements...

Words: 1244 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Public Safety and Privacy Analysis

...Understanding the search and seizure laws; that govern all law enforcement and private security perssonel. Next the paper looks at the laws for surveillance by the police. After that this paper is investigating the idea of cameras in the school system legal or not, for protection or is it a violation of the fourth amendment rights to the students. Last the paper looks at surveillance by private security. Understanding Search and Seizure Law The police are governed by the 4th Amendment to the U.S. constitution which places limits on the power they have. For the police to make arrests, search a person or their property they have to work under the fourth amendment, which are the laws set for search and seizure. The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads as follows: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized" (The Charters of Freedom, nd). The fourth amendment provides for the search and seizure and is all about privacy of the people. Because of this freedom, the fourth amendment protects against “unreasonable” searches and seizures by any law enforcement authorities. On the other-hand the fourth amendment permits all search and seizures that are reasonable....

Words: 1689 - Pages: 7