Second Amendment

In: Other Topics

Submitted By megaprime75
Words 2105
Pages 9
Second Amendment:
Still Valid after 200 years
Jeremiah A. Dozier
ITT Technical Institute

The subject of this research paper is on a particular subject that has spurred an ongoing debate for many years, the Second Amendment. To this day many Americans have raised the question is the Second Amendment still valid after 200 years? The answer to that question is YES! When the founding fathers signed the Constitution in this document there are many Articles and the First ten are known as the bill rights and the first one is the right to free speech, most everyone is in agreement that is one of the most important rights as citizens. Now the Second Amendment which states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. In this paper it is the authors’ intension to show why this Amendment is important today and in the future. The Second Amendment has been a part of this country since the very beginning of our great nation. Fast forward to the present, they are now people saying the Second Amendment is no longer valid or needed. How can that be we not need this right or it no longer applies to the present day?
One of the main reasons most people say we don’t need this fundamental right is because of the recent waves of shootings around this country. The only response is to put a ban on firearms or limit how many rounds a weapons magazine can hold. The Second Amendment is in place as part of the Bill of Rights, when you remove this right, where does it stop? What is to say one right is more valid than the any other? Many in the government are trying to re-write this right to suit their own agendas. This has happened before time and time again, not in this country but in others. If the ones who want to remove this right get their way it shall start a slippery down-ward…...

Similar Documents

14th Amendment

...The written purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment was to guarantee repayment of the national war debt and it prohibited repayment of the Confederate debt. The amendment gave Congress the right to reduce the representation of any state that does not have impartial male suffrage. The effect of this was known as the "swindle" and it allowed northern states to retain white suffrage because they had few African Americans in their populations and they would not be penalized. The amendments most important provision denied an American citizen as anyone born in the United States or naturalized and this automatically made African Americans citizens. This provision also prohibits states from abridging “the privileges or immunities” of citizens, depriving “any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law,” or denying “any person equal protection of laws”. The framers of the amendment intended to prohibit laws that applied to one race only, such as the black codes, or that made certain act felonies when committed by black but not white lawbreakers. The framers did not intend to prevent segregation in schools and public places. Congress passed a bill extending the life of the Freedman’s Bureau which was created in March 1865. The purpose of the Freedman's Bureau was to provide emergency food, clothing, and medical care to war refugees and took charge of settling freedpeople on abandoned lands. The new bill gave the bureau the added responsibilities of supervising......

Words: 316 - Pages: 2

Fifth Amendment

...The Fight for the Fifteenth Amendment The fifteenth amendment to the United states constitution prohibited the United States government to deny someone suffrage based on color or race. The fight for suffrage for African Americans was a long one and took the help of many people and their words and ideas to finally win. However, it was a small step for mankind. African American men finally gained the right to vote, but where did that leave women? Fredrick Douglass and Elizabeth Cady Stanton were two important writers dedicated to the cause of gaining the right to vote. Although their struggles were similar in nature, the difference between gaining suffrage for all races, and gaining suffrage for both sexes raised arguments between what should have been a collaborative force. In Fredrick Douglass’ essay “Learning to Read and Write” and Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s essay “Declaration of Sediments and Resolutions” there were significant shared literally binaries. First off is the underlying factor Civilized v. Uncivilized. This is relevant to the argument because they both are considered uncivilized so they can’t vote. Secondly, Mental Darkness v. Education. Douglass wasn’t able to be educated because he was a slave to a white family and it was looked down upon for him to be educated. Stanton was a woman therefore she was seen by society as less intelligent even though she wasn’t. Third is Depravity v. Innocence. Both of them were being treated wrongly by someone above them and...

Words: 892 - Pages: 4

2nd Amendment

...A topic that has been hotly debated over the years and has become highly controversial is the second amendment to the constitution and its importance. The Second Amendment states that, “a well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The interpretation of the “right of the people” shows that it protects the individual rights of the citizens to own guns. The second amendment is widely considered to be the most important amendment in the constitution for several reasons. It bestows the citizens with protection, defense, and it establishes greater hegemony for the nation as a whole. The second amendment grants protection to all law biding citizens. It protects them from criminals and even from the government. Owning a gun allows citizens to protect their property and themselves. For example, if a criminal knew for a fact that a certain house or a certain neighborhood had guns then he would surely think twice before breaking in or vandalizing their property. The second amendment gives the citizens protection with guns and therefore it discourages criminals from attacking the innocent. According to firearms expert Neil Schulman, firearms are the most effective way to protect your home from common criminals. As long as you learn how to use guns safely and take precautions to keep them out of the irresponsible hands of criminals, then the guns makes your home safer and could potentially...

Words: 999 - Pages: 4

An Essay on the Original Intent of the Second Amendment

...The Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States: “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The Second Amendment has been the subject of controversy only for roughly the last 80 years. Even though, as some argue, the Framers themselves argued over its wording, the almost universally accepted opinion was that it guaranteed an individual right. It was in 1934 that the first attempt at universal gun control on a national level occurred. In 1934, the United States was at the height of the Great Depression (Kangas, 1997). In 1933, the 18th Amendment to the Constitution had finally been repealed, marking the end of the noble experiment known as “prohibition”. The fourteen years of prohibition had nurtured an atmosphere of speakeasies, bootlegging, gangsters, and mafia. The year following the repeal of prohibition was marred by some of the worst gangster violence in American history. John Dillinger and Baby Face Nelson were on the run. Bonnie and Clyde were killed in that year (1934 in the United States, 2013). The nation had just finished its war with Al Capone’s gang (Al Capone, 2013). The people were tired of the unrestrained violence and, in an apparent classic effort to obtain safety at the expense of liberty, were willing to accept limits on the right to bear arms. Although this discussion is not about the history of gun control but about the right to bear...

Words: 2488 - Pages: 10

Second Amendment

...Second Amendment: Still Valid after 200 years Jeremiah A. Dozier ITT Technical Institute The subject of this research paper is on a particular subject that has spurred an ongoing debate for many years, the Second Amendment. To this day many Americans have raised the question is the Second Amendment still valid after 200 years? The answer to that question is YES! When the founding fathers signed the Constitution in this document there are many Articles and the First ten are known as the bill rights and the first one is the right to free speech, most everyone is in agreement that is one of the most important rights as citizens. Now the Second Amendment which states, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”. In this paper it is the authors’ intension to show why this Amendment is important today and in the future. The Second Amendment has been a part of this country since the very beginning of our great nation. Fast forward to the present, they are now people saying the Second Amendment is no longer valid or needed. How can that be we not need this right or it no longer applies to the present day? One of the main reasons most people say we don’t need this fundamental right is because of the recent waves of shootings around this country. The only response is to put a ban on firearms or limit how many rounds a weapons magazine can hold. The Second Amendment is in place...

Words: 2105 - Pages: 9

Second Amendment

...Johnson, Daniel English 104 Summa Paper Mr. Nathanial Schmidt 10/17/13 The Constitution of the United States marked the start of a new form of government for the newly freed colonies. It established a system of government in which the US has had for over two hundred years. The Framers of the Constitution wrote it to “establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity…” It was created to protect the citizens of the United States and our freedoms. The Constitution is what sets the US apart from many other countries. The Articles of Confederation, Bill of Rights, and Constitution are arguably the most important documents in United States History. They were the documents that put in place the first government of the United States of America. Although written over two hundred years ago, the Constitution is timeless in the ideas and principles that it promotes. As of late, the relevancy of the Constitution to today’s society has been called into question, more specifically our second amendment. Does the Constitution of the United States with the inclusion of our second amendment right continue to insure domestic tranquility? The United States Constitution, including the second amendment, is a healthy document, which still serves our nation exceptionally well and continues to insure domestic tranquility. The evolution of society and recent events...

Words: 1113 - Pages: 5

En1320 Research Paper - Second Amendment

...The Second Amendment by Steven Weir Sweir112@email.itt-tech.edu 14491334 Network Systems Administrator Paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for EN 1320 A6 Sept 2012 ITT Technical Institute March 4, 2013 Introduction On December 15, 1791 ten amendments to the Constitution of the newly formed United States of America were put in effect, these were called the Bill of Rights. The second article of this document reads; “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (James Madison, 1791) Many people are familiar with the Bill of rights, such as the First Amendment which guarantees the right to free speech, or the Third Amendment which protects people from housing soldiers unwillingly. Now, why did the founding fathers put these Rights into law? Was it perhaps because they had just fought a bloody war for their independence from a nation that restricted the rights of the people? And why is the second article (That’s the second most important right) about ownership of firearms and militias? Is it because they had firsthand experience about what happens when you take away the right to bear arms? Today, laws are in effect that hamper the ability for citizens to own and carry firearms. A crucial right to the inhabitants of the United States has already been infringed by gun regulations and there is no end in sight...

Words: 1022 - Pages: 5

2nd Amendment

...The Second Amendment For many years there has been an ongoing debate over the Second Amendment and how it should be interpreted. The issue that is being debated is whether our government has the right to regulate guns. The answer of who has which rights lies within how one interprets the Second Amendment. With this being the case, one must also think about what circumstances the Framers were under when this Amendment was written. There are two major sides to this debate, one being the collective side, which feels that the right was given for collective purposes only. This side is in favor of having stricter gun control laws, as they feel that by having stricter laws the number of crimes that are being committed with guns will be reduced and thus save lives. However while gun control laws may decrease criminals" access to guns, the same laws restricts gun owning citizens who abide by the law; these citizens make up a great majority of the opposing side of this argument. These people argue that the law was made with the individual citizens in mind. This group believes that the Amendment should be interpreted to guarantee citizens free access to firearms. One major group that is in strong opposition of stricter gun control laws is the National Rifle Association (NRA). The NRA argues that having stricter gun control laws will only hinder law-abiding citizens. The final outcome on this debate will mainly depend on how this Amendment is going to be interpreted. The Second...

Words: 2267 - Pages: 10

First Amendment

... had no idea if it was going to work out, but the founding fathers then went forward to draft a constitution that has served as the law for the last 200 years. This new constitution made the federal government much more powerful yet still promised to uphold the rights of the people to prevent exploitation by their government. In this constitution is included a “Bill of Rights,” ten amendments that were implanted in order to protect people’s freedoms. Few of these are more important than the one that protects the freedom of speech, of religion, and of press; the First Amendment. The First Amendment guarantees that no law shall be created that prohibits the free exercise of religion, the freedom of speech, infringing the freedom of the press, and interfering with the right to assemble. There have been countless cases involving this amendment and of course it is one of the pillars of this nation’s history therefore controversies always surround these cases. The influence of Thomas Jefferson in the drafting of this amendment was essential, he was in Paris while the constitution was being drafted and he opposed the creation of said document if it did not contain a Bill of Rights that at its core it protects human freedoms against government overreaching, he knew this was an indispensable asset. Jefferson insisted, that any constitution for this country should say that there is a list of untouchable areas into which congress cannot transgress. (Volokh) There was a lot of debate...

Words: 1005 - Pages: 5

Second Amendment

...Eng 101 30 May 2012 A Case for the Second Amendment The second amendment frequently finds itself under attack on many fronts. Some of these attacks are rooted in fear, others in ignorance, but in all cases they must be defeated in order to insure the continued existence of freedom and liberty within our country. The second amendment must not be infringed upon, or our nation shall fall as democracies always do; to the sound of thunderous applause. When does the constitution stop and state law begin? The tenth amendment provides in clear language that “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.“ What does this mean exactly? In its most basic form, the language states that if the constitution provides for something as an inalienable right, then the states have no power to step on it. Therefore, as the second amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” So, with the double stack of the tenth amendment providing that the states cannot overrule the Constitution, and with the second amendment being notable here for it being the only use of the phrase “being necessary” in the entire constitution, any argument that the founding fathers “didn't mean it like that” becomes completely invalid. Another common attack against the...

Words: 775 - Pages: 4

Second Amendment

...Introduction: The second amendment states the right for a citizen to bear arms. Some people called this a protection act. But where the debate lies is “are citizens taken advantage of this right?” With recent increase in crimes rates, most citizens’ question the right to bear arms. According to a recent report done by political reporter Peter Hamby, “eighty two percent of crimes are gun related”. (CNN 2013) This relates heavily to the Second Amendment, which Americans feel like upholding the United States Constitution is the most important topic. There is a law that states “The Federal Constitution cannot be altered or changed in any way”. However, due to the recent increase in gun related crimes a change in the gun policy needs to take place both federally and locally. Now, the question is to tighten fire arm laws or ease up on the fire arm laws. This briefing will examine the second amendment, review past court cases relating to gun relating crimes, and examine the state of Pennsylvania current gun policy. The goal of the second amendment and what was the outcome of the second amendment. What needs to be done to uphold the democratic status of what standards of the United States of America is supposed to be. Also, the impact of social media and why it is a huge factor in gun relating crimes and most importantly the second amendment, the biggest question is what the federal government needs to do in terms of social media and what restrictions need to be put in place...

Words: 1097 - Pages: 5

Second Amendment

...The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution Amendment II of the Unites States Constitution, commonly referred to as, “the right to bear arms”, is written as follows: “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” This amendment was adopted along with 9 other amendments contained in the Bill of Rights, on December 15, 1791. At that point, it was merely a federal provision, and the states varied on their choices of how to include the right to bear arms in their own constitution. In fact, some chose not to include it at all. It has been described as an auxiliary right, supporting the natural rights of self-defense. Political thought at the time was rightfully concerned about political corruption and governmental tyranny. A personal right to bear arms was a potential check against tyranny. The wording of the amendment is somewhat ambiguous, and has been subjected to much interpretation. Additionally, the exact wording and punctuation of the amendment changes from document to document, until its final version, the way it appears in the Bill of Rights. In modern commentary, the different opinions have been classified into 3 interpretive models: 1) Individual- rights model → it is the right of an individual to own and possess firearms. 2) The collective model → the right belongs to people collectively rather than individuals; the rights only purpose is to...

Words: 1033 - Pages: 5

Fourth Amendment

...1. Private Search of Immobile Vehicle The fourth amendment provides individuals with protection from searches and seizures that may be deemed unreasonable. However, it is applicable when such searches and seizures have been carried out by state or federal officials or agents of the government (Schulhofer, 2012). Such agents would include the local police officers, Border Patrol Agents, and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) agents, among other government security agents. As such, any searches that may be made on the private property by private citizens or private security officers are not subject to the Fourth Amendment. Thus, I as the Information Security Specialist of the Makestuff Company or Mr. Yourprop’s supervisor can conduct searches on the vehicle of Mr. Yourprop currently parked in the parking lot without violating the Fourth Amendment since we are not government officials or representatives. The evidence that would be obtained from the search, if any, can be handed over to the police as evidence against Mr. Yourprop for violation of the Intellectual Property Law. In State v. Buswell, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that the protection of the Fourth Amendment was limited to government action and thus any private searches conducted by private citizens were not covered by the exclusionary rule. Thus, if evidence is seized through a private search, then it can be handed over to the police to be applied in a court of law as evidence for an offense (State v...

Words: 1396 - Pages: 6

Second Amendment

...Second Amendment In this research paper, I will argue for the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment deals with the rights of United States citizens to bear, and keep arms. Many people are against the Second Amendment and want to abolish it, and have guns removed from United States citizens. The Constitution was written to protect the rights of the people in the United States, and by taking away guns would infringe on our constitutional rights. How would citizens defend themselves in a life or death situation if guns were to be taken away? The Fourteenth Amendment "No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; ... " (Taylor; par. 21) was integrated with the Second Amendment right, to keep and bear arms for the purpose of self-defense. Self-defense includes, protecting your-self and family from imminent harm, and being able to protect one’s personal property. The use of deadly force maybe necessary to help in defending your-self from an intruder entering your home, or to prevent a kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, robbery, or domestic violence. Regulations have been implemented through-out state and local governments to help aid in gun ownership. Reasonable restrictions have been executed to control, that who can possess a gun. To name a few gun control restrictions for gun ownership are people who...

Words: 1377 - Pages: 6

The Second Amendment Opinion

...William Croft PS1350 Week 1 Submit Analysis The first ten amendments of the US Constitution make up what is known as the Bill of Rights. Written by James Madison in response to the requests from many of the states for better constitutional protection for individual freedoms, the Bill of Rights lists specific prohibitions on governmental power. I have chosen to discuss the second amendment for this week’s analysis. The second amendment of the US Constitution states, “A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” In more simple terms the second amendment says that it is the right of the people, under certain regulations, to possess and carry firearms. However like any other legal right it has its limitations. Now no state has the authority to take your second amendment rights from you but they can place limits on it. Usually these limits are placed using licensing requirements and bans on certain guns in a certain class. Being a registered owner of firearms, this amendment is very important to me. I have yet been in a situation where the use of my gun was needed, and I hope that that situation never transpires. On a day to day basis we all venture out into a world of unknown evils, where at a moment’s notice that situation could occur. This amendment gives me the right to own a firearm, and in turn allows me to feel safer in my daily life. If not for the second...

Words: 478 - Pages: 2