Free Essay

Security Dilemma Three Theories

In: Social Issues

Submitted By fuuckit
Words 1153
Pages 5
The 20th century has undoubtedly been a time of extreme international uncertainty and political turbulence. Major international conflicts including two world wars, and numerous threats of terrorism has escalated states fear of their own nation's security. Organski explained the direct correlation between war and security when he said , “war occurs because power is expected to conduce to proportional influence, wealth, and security.”. A simple definition of security dilemma is when one state’s security becomes another state’s insecurity. Vague signals along with lack of communication can cause uncertainty, which can result in unwanted fighting.
The big question is whether or not we can resolve the never ending security dilemma spiral through globalization and international institutions. Is it possible to learn from past mistakes and learn from new perspectives in order to obtain peace, I believe so. This essay will provide explanations from all of the International Relations theories, and will furthermore discuss how global order can be achieved through careful cooperation between states. To begin with liberalism is optimistic about cooperation, and believes that decision makers are rational and human nature is good. Liberalism focuses on three main concepts: international institutions, democratic peace, and economic interdependence. Liberalists view war as avoidable if government is reduced and if more international institutions are created. They hold international institutions with a lot of merit. Firstly, they consider international institutions to create peace because the institutions reduce transaction costs, make state commitments more credible, enable states to discuss issues multiple times, and encourage countries to join in

multilateral collective security mechanisms ( Textbook p. 117­118). International institutions gives states the platform to settle disputes, while maintaining trust and order. International institutions are so important not only because they create a space for cooperation and communication; but also because they are responsible for punishment and enforcement.
Institutions create a standard for each country. Alternate countries will cooperate easier after they witness liberal behavior being followed and rewarded by other states. International institutions get rid of a massive amount of uncertainty, which encourages states from spiraling into the security dilemma. Liberalists view cooperation as attractive. Liberalists believe that economic interdependence promotes peace. The theory states that if countries are dependent on each other for prosperity, than countries will have more incentives to cooperate. For example, because free trade raises the cost of war it is beneficial to solve problems through diplomacy and cooperation rather than war. Liberalists truly believe that through international institutions and democracy peace is possible, and the security dilemma can be stopped. However, it is essential not to forget that converting countries into liberal democratic states is exceptionally difficult. On the other hand realists are pessimistic about creating lasting peace. Unlike liberalists, realists view people as greedy and aggressive. Realists main priority is maximum power and security. earsheimer said it best when he explained the realist viewpoint in, The Tragedy of
M
Great Power Politics, “ the best way for a state to survive in anarchy is to take advantage of other states and gain power at their expense.” Realists find cooperation impossible because they claim that no state is trustworthy. Contrary to liberalism, realism does not put trust in agreements and rules set by international systems. Realists are more concerned with having a stable balance in

power, in order to protect their own state's security. Realism does not measure their gains relatively; and therefore tries to outperform other states, which causes unnecessary violence.
Realists constantly fear war. This uncertainty is based on the belief that without an authoritative power there is nothing to stop war. However, realists do not take into consideration that security is more than defending physical borders, but also defending the international system. Weapons has made war accessible and convenient. Realists also neglect to realize that shared values and ideologies prevent conflict and can lead to trustworthy cooperation. Realists refuse to cooperate and therefore see the security dilemma as unpreventable. Lastly, constructivist beliefs are created through international events and are socially constructed. Constructivism is based on ideas and societal norms. Although, some scholars disregard constructivism because of its basis on history, it is important to understand how they view the security dilemma. Constructivist's thoughts on security is dependent on how society views security. Constructivism preaches that people act toward objects on the basis of the meaning that the objects have for them. For example, when states act differently toward friends nation's than toward enemies nation’s. Constructivism states that the security dilemma can be avoided through cooperation and communication between states with shared ideologies.
Constructivists saw cooperation as an opportunity to create a collective identity between nations.
Through cooperation a new identity of shared values and interests could be formed smoothly.
Huntington insisted that if conflict occurred it would be between different civilizations because of fault lines (religious/cultural beliefs). . Similar to liberalism, constructivism notices that nations with similar values are more likely to honestly cooperate with each other.

I believe that liberalism offers the best explanation on the security dilemma. Realists neglect to acknowledge that war is avoidable. Liberalists understand that nations would rather cooperate and sacrifice a handful of values, than risk complete destruction. Realists fail to accept that democratic nations with shared values are capable of communication and agreement.
Although, liberalists recognize that cooperation is complicated they know it is possible through international institutions and economic interdependence. Liberalists support the notion that security is more than a measure of power. Unlike realism, liberalists view war as counter­effective. War is viewed as expensive and damaging to states economies and cultures.
The security dilemma and realists do not understand that security is not dependent only on territory. Liberalists state that power is not determined by how much territory each state holds, but depends rather on the role they play in the international system and their level of economic prosperity. The security dilemma is minimized through voluntary cooperation. Liberalists believe that states will cooperate with one another to escape conquest and the other negative impacts of war. The security dilemma causes unnecessary suspicions and mistrust, which in turn causes other states to have more insecurities. The circle of uncertainty can only be stopped with trust.
When trust is established between states cooperation can be achieved. The violence and ambiguity of the 20th century has caused a lot of distress globally. In conclusion all three theories; realism, liberalism, and constructivism, understand the security differently. Through realism, peace is achieved through military strength and power. To liberalists peace is possible through a standard set of rules, communication, trust, and

cooperation. Finally, constructivists see peace as what the state makes it to be. The security dilemma spotlights how states react to uncertainty. In order to protect their state sacrifices and knowledge must be used. It is difficult to say if lasting peace is possible, but I agree with liberalists that peace is likely especially in the recent future where new technologies and understanding is available.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Tragedy of Great Power Politics

...Mearsheimer: The Tragedy of Great Power Politics In The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, author John Mearsheimer outlines a new theory of international relations which he calls “offensive realism.” Mearsheimer’s theory is a spin-off of Kenneth Waltz’s neorealism, also known as structural or defensive realism. Mearsheimer follows on the premises of Kenneth Waltz’s theory by deriving the behavior of states from the “structure” of the international system. Mearsheimer outlines five assumptions or premises comprising his theoretical foundation: 1) the international system is anarchic (no world government) 2) all states posses some offensive capability and are thus capable of using force against other states 3) no state can be certain another state will not use force against it 4) survival, territorial integrity, and domestic autonomy are the primal goals of all states and 5) great powers are rational actors (Mearsheimer 2001, pp. 30-31). It is difficult to definitively discern what conclusions Mearsheimer thinks follow from these premises (Wagner 2007, pg. 14). He argues for perhaps three conclusions: 1) great powers have powerful incentives to “think and act offensively with regard to each other…In particular, three general patterns of behavior result: fear, self-help, and power maximization (Mearsheimer 2001, pg.32)” 2) even states that want only to survive end up pursuing hegemony as the ultimate insurance for survival 3) even states that care only about their survival may...

Words: 1364 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Organizational Behavior Final Assignment

...Organizational Behavior Final Assignment By: Colette Gillespie Class: Organizational Management Teacher: Prof. Missy Santman What is Organizational Behavior Practice (Question 1) Organizational Behavior Practice is a field of study that investigates the impact of individuals, groups and structures upon behavior within an organization. Organizational Behavior Practices focus on many different areas like for work behavior (Group Behavior, Individual Behavior, and Collective behavior). Organization Behavior Practice is an interdisciplinary field that includes sociology, psychology, communication, and management. Organization Behavior Practice is designed to help manager better understand work out come (job satisfaction, learning, and commitment). Organizational Behavior Practice helps a manager better understand work behavior, perceptions, personalities, motivation, and attuide. When Organization behavior Practice is used it will give the manager a better understanding on a lot of different area when it comes to work behavior, and why an employee might be acting a certain way. Where I have seen Organizational Behavior Practice used (Question 1) I have seen Organizational Behavior Practice used before when I worked for Production Line. There was a problem going on with the employee performance and everyone was starting to get very negative, which was affecting the work they were doing. Our totals were going down along with the speed of quality...

Words: 1490 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Personal Ethics Development

...teachers, religious leaders, and the community within one lives. When an ethical dilemma arise, one must first recognize and understand the steps to resolve the issue. When making an ethical decision several factors are taken into consideration. Ethical systems are also used to assist in achieving the final decision. This paper will review the stages of personal ethical development and the different components pertinent to each theory. Personal Ethics Development As a child, morals and values develop and are learned by the inner actions with parents and other adults in the family. Knowing right from wrong is an internal belief derived from one's character and values. As a person grows older and starts school, his/her morality develops even further. They gain ethical opinions from teachers, and peers, which reinforce their own concepts of right and wrong. Additionally, as one interacts with society and the community where he/she lives, they develop or follow the beliefs of their norms. In turn, value decides one's friends, and the job they may accept. Morals and values outline the direction a person will take in life. Fairness, responsibility, trusting, and caring assist in building character and forms the ethical systems used to make decisions. When dealing with conflict or difficult situations, several factors should be considered that will have a significant impact on the final decision. The three factors are context, values, and principles. Context Context is the first...

Words: 1268 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Professional Ethics

...FATHIMATH ADAM S0942950 TUTOR’S NAME: MR MUSLIM ANEES LEARNING CENTRE: VILLA COLLEGE TRIMESTER: SEPTEMBER 2012 Table of Contents 1. Introduction 3 2. Identification of Ethical dilemma 3 2.1. Reasons why it is an Ethical dilemma 4 3. Analysis of Dilemma 5 3.1. Effects on Stakeholders 8 3.1.1. Deceptive Argument 8 3.1.2. Normative Argument 9 3.1.3. Instrumental Argument 9 1. Recommendation and Solution 9 2. Conclusion 10 Reference List 11 1. Introduction This study concerns ethical dilemma that is occurring in Muartoto Pvt Ltd. In addition the dilemma will be analyzed using all the relevant theories of moral reasoning and ethics. Moreover, a solution statement will be recommended by analyzing the problem in the perspective of economic, legal and ethical. Reduction in workforce due to economic downturn has become a biggest concern for the employee in today’s organizations. The matter has become the forefront of the legal and policy agendas in several countries of employment context. Downsizing the workforce is critically challenging for human resource (HR) professionals. HR professionals must be a concerned about designing and executing a workforce reduction strategy that is ethically balanced. (Ronald, 2007) 2. Identification of Ethical dilemma Muartoto Pvt Ltd is expanded into wide range of service which includes designing printing in large format, advertizing and etc. In 2007 they started as a small company with few staffs....

Words: 2730 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Security Studies

...Securitization Theory Author Institution Course title Instructor Date Critically discuss the securitization theory – using the case study of War on terror in Afghanistan (2001-2012) Introduction Security study was in the past regarded as a sub-discipline of international relations underpinned in Anglo-American thinking. Until early 1990s, security studies were considered as a strategic studies focusing on a strong military focus. This traditional view of security involved the protection of the state and a scientific agenda to secure the state from definable threats and maintain the status quo. This is a positivist approach which was based on rationalism and realism. The Copenhagen School presented an alternative view of security studies by responding to the traditional approach of forming a clear sense of ‘what is security’. This approach is defined in three mechanisms: development of sectors approach to security, developing a regional focus on security and critically engendering a social constructivist theory of security through securitization studies. This theory will be the main focus of this discussion. To achieve a critical discussion of what securitization really entails, this paper will use the case study of USA’s war on terrorism in Afghanistan. The approach used by the US government to fight against terrorism in Afghanistan and Iraq can be considered as a securitization approach which has led to a resulted in security problems in the two countries rather...

Words: 3288 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Conflict Management and Negotiation

...organisation. Introduction: Bargaining can be defined as an agreement between parties settling what each gives or receives in a transaction between them or what course of action or policy each pursues in respect to the other. The study of bargaining process involves an analysis of the actors, the stakes and the factors involved. All theories feed into each other, and combining these theories allows for a more complete understanding of the issues involved in bargaining process and therefore helps to improve individuals negotiation skills. There are several different theories analyzing the process and outcome of bargaining process as follows:- 1. Integrative Approach Model 2. Game Theory 3. Behavioral Theory 4. Power Theory 5. Optimal Agent Independence 1. Integrative Approach Model The integrative approach divides the negotiating process into three phases: • Diagnostic • Formulation • Details In the practice of negotiation, these phases are not necessarily linear. Rather, they can be repeated and addressed many times throughout the negotiation process.  The toughness dilemma in the integrative approach calls for tough diagnosis in order to clearly elucidate the true interests of each party. In the formulation phase, negotiators should be more soft, in order to find a common, mutually acceptable solution. In the detail phase, the negotiators should again take a tough stance to assure their party receives as much benefit...

Words: 3336 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Is Aanteken

...International Security Lecture 1 March 30th, 2015 The politics of security knowledge What is international security? We could start thinking about the security council of the UN But also about the invasion of Afghanistan (chapter 7 UN in order to secure the international security) We can also think about security in terms of the invasion of Iraq in 2003. This was a unilateral act of war, but sure it can also mean other things We can think of the national security agency, the agency in charge of spying all the signals and communications to a certain extent. What’s interesting about the NSA, it is seen as a threat to the security of the privacy. Lately, with the reports of the UN development programme, we start talking about HUMAN security (not military security, but rather the security of individuals, having a livelihood that’s acceptable). Whether security is international or not, it can be a rather confusing word The protection of values we hold dear. We search for it, we pursue it, we achieve it, we deny it to others. * what is to be secured? Is it the security of states? Or individuals? * What is the actual threat that we’re facing? Primarily to be dealing with military threats, or are there other types of threats we are facing. Essentially contested concept A concept that ‘inevitably’ involves endless disputes about their proper uses on the part of their users – Walter Gallie There can be ambiguity (one persons freedom-fighter is the other’s...

Words: 16869 - Pages: 68

Premium Essay

Foreign Policy Must Be Formulated in Accordance with the National Interest’. Evaluate This Claim Which Is Attributable to Realist Thinking on Foreign Policy.

...Foreign Policy Module Summative Assessment Question 1: Foreign policy must be formulated in accordance with the national interest’. Evaluate this claim which is attributable to realist thinking on foreign policy. * * According to realist thinking on foreign policy, international relations and politics are formulated in accordance with national interest. This presupposes that the key actors in International Relations are sovereign states that behave similarly regardless of their type of government. As well, a state of anarchy is at the fundamental core of this argument and national interests of egoistic states as the main outward presence in international realm. Classic Realism, originally emerged from the European concert of aristocratic diplomacy. By evaluating this claim, this essay will reassert the position and importance of Offensive and Defensive Realism in our contemporary post 9/11 world. These are respectively neoclassical realism and neorealism. Firstly, a detailed account of realism will be produced highlighting the emergence of national interest as the fundamental feature or goal of sovereign states. This is done either through the maintenance of a status quo or aspiration of accumulating influence. It will be concluded that Defensive Realism or neorealism is the principal theoretical sub-school in according this claim any legitimacy. Secondly, a general evaluation of neorealism in post 9/11 world will be provided; and a comparison, and ultimately an...

Words: 4135 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Edward Snowden: Hero Or Hero?

...Introduction Edward Snowden was born on June 21, 1983 in North Carolina. He was a high school and a community college dropout, who eventually obtained a GED. He was medically discharged from the Army Reserves after breaking both legs in an accident. Snowden studied computers during his two short stints at a community college in Maryland. Soon after, he began working for the National Security Administration (NSA) as a security guard and then secured a high paying IT position with the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) as a federal contractor. Eventually he landed a job on a classified program back at the NSA (Edward Snowden Biography, n.d.). Accordingly, to gain access to clandestine programs and highly classified information, Snowden was granted...

Words: 2005 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Business Law & Ethics

...Part A (a): Ethical dilemma The ethical dilemma that Kate faces is whether to report the potential milk contamination to the Queensland Food Safety Authority (FSA). Ethical Egoism Under ethical egoism, Kate would follow Ben’s decision and not pursue the milk contamination issue further. Kate’s main self-interest is that she keeps her job at the restaurant to provide for her family and fund her university degree. Therefore, upholding Ben’s self-interest of not saying anything, will not only ensure Kate her job, it may also result in her being seen as more trustworthy and loyal to the restaurant owners. Hence, Kate not saying anything is justified under egoism. Utilitarianism To solve a dilemma under utilitarianism, all the positives and negatives must be evaluated in order to ascertain what will give the greatest good. The following are positives and negative if Kate chooses not to alert authorities of the contamination. Positives: Kate’s job will be safe as Ben threatened her that she may be fired if she pursues the matter. Ben and the restaurant owner would be pleased as any bad publicity associated with the restaurant could severely affect business. Bad publicity may also force employees to become retrenched, including Kate and the close friends she has made at her work. Furthermore, the risk that anyone has contaminated milk is miniscule, and lastly, FSA inspectors won’t disrupt Service because they won’t be called out. Negatives: Innocent members of the community...

Words: 1113 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Humanitarian Intervention

...Introduction It’s always serious business to intervene decisively in other peoples’ affairs. What should an external agent do when injustices are taking place within another state? May a state or international institution like the United Nations intervene in the affairs of another state? Do we have a moral and ethical duty for intervention when a political regime is harming its own citizens? Is it legal under International law for a state to intervene in another state’s territorial and political sovereignty with or without United Nation Security Council’s approval? It is the aim of this essay to examine some of the answers commonly given to these questions. To address the ethical and legal justifiability of intervention this essay will begin by analyzing how we define humanitarian intervention. The second section discusses moral and ethical issue relating to humanitarian intervention. The discussion focuses on the several theories that present a moral case for intervention. It concludes by examining whether international law should affirm a right to humanitarian intervention. The literature on the ethics and legality of humanitarian intervention is filled with disagreement. This essay seeks to identify and critically assess the often unexamined moral and legal assumptions behind these disagreements. Definition of Humanitarian Intervention It is necessary to begin with a clear understanding of the concept to be analyzed. We need then to start by addressing the question...

Words: 3276 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Realist Theorys

...realist theorys. there are two types of realist theorys these are left and right realism. In summary, realists think that humankind is not inherently benevolent but rather self-centered and competitive. This perspective, which is shared by theorists such as Thomas Hobbes, views human nature as egocentric (not necessarily selfish) and conflictual unless there exist conditions under which humans may coexist. It is also disposed of the notion that an individual's intuitive nature is made up of anarchy. In regards to self-interest, these individuals are self-reliant and are motivated in seeking more power. They are also believed to be fearful. This view contrasts with the approach of liberalism to international relations. The state emphasizes an interest in accumulating power to ensure security in an anarchic world. Power is a concept primarily thought of in terms of material resources necessary to induce harm or coerce other states (to fight and win wars). The use of power places an emphasis on coercive tactics being acceptable to either accomplish something in the national interest or avoid something inimical to the national interest. The state is the most important actor under realism. It is unitary and autonomous because it speaks and acts with one voice. The power of the state is understood in terms of its military capabilities. A key concept under realism is the international distribution of power referred to as system polarity. Polarity refers to the number of blocs...

Words: 559 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

International Relation Theories

...IInternational Relations Theories The following three theories are key to international relations and contribute to the framework of ideologies within it: realism, liberalism and critical theory. These three theories shape the views and consensus of International Relations and tend to categorise the general public into one of the three groups. However, this is a highly controversial statement due to the fact there are no clear definitions of realism, liberalism or critical theory, just differences throughout them. For example a key difference would be that realists make the basic assumption that the international system is anarchic where as liberals believe in institutions such as the U.N. can intervene effectively on state issues, there are also conflicting views between the three on issues such as war, the economy and major corporations. Within realism there is this sense of belief of “self-interest” this is a theme seen throughout Mearshermiers article Australians should fear the rise of China. Mearshamiers opening statement quotes “It is likely to lead to intense security competition with US – and considerable potential for war”. In a brief summary Mearshermier talks about how with this augmentation of Chinas power, surrounding countries such as the United States of America and Australia should be prepared to take action and prepare for war. This is a key ideology of realism, as although they do not encourage war in anyway they believe that war will always exist and...

Words: 1197 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Butt

...whose main focus is the nature of politics at the international level. Students will acquire the empirical and conceptual foundations needed to understand a world political system which cannot be accurately described as either pure anarchy or a coherent form of ‘global governance’. The starting point is the notion of ‘international society’, which refers to the set of institutions and common procedures generated by states over the last three and a half centuries in their attempts to achieve some minimal form of co-existence, but which has gradually evolved to include many non-state actors and different levels of activity – diplomatic, economic and cultural, as well as that of military competition. By the end of the course you should be able to have an informed discussion about: the historical origins of the present system; what is distinctive about international politics as opposed to politics inside the state; and the main challenges which confront humanity in the twenty-first century. You will also acquire a basic familiarity with the main theories needed to think analytically - and critically - about the idea of international society and the behaviour of the actors which constitute it. Brief Description of the Paper The subject of International Relations (usually given capital letters, as opposed to international relations as events) has a huge range. Some see it as covering everything that has happened on the globe during recorded history,...

Words: 12326 - Pages: 50

Premium Essay

Mt302 Final

...that she opened up communication between management and employees, we all understood our roles better but the communication to upper management broke down. At the most recent job that I had with a national tax company for income tax season they put a large emphasis on organization behavior this year. The training consisted mostly of “soft skills” as they called it. We had hours of training and practice about how to interact with our co-workers and customers. This was very positive because in a service business like we were in, the communication and cooperation really counted. The chain of command was laid out for us so that if a customer had an issue, we knew exactly how to best handle that problem as well. Question 2: Demonstrate how theories of motivation from...

Words: 2031 - Pages: 9