Sentencing for a Consumer Crime

In: Other Topics

Submitted By lilma32
Words 841
Pages 4
Assignment 1.3.2 - Sentencing For a Consumer Crime
AC6440 - Business Crime and Ethics Behavior
Professor Dawn Taylor
Adrienne R. Daniels
20 May 2014

The defendant, David Robinson is a first time offender and has been convicted by a jury of running a sweepstakes telemarketing scam over the telephone. The con artist, acting alone, scammed 2,000 elderly victims within the United States out of $100,000 dollars. The scheme involved telling victims over the age of 55 that they would be eligible for winning a trip to Hawaii, but that they first had to pay $50 to the scammer. There was no trip and no one won. As it relates to the violation of 18 U.S. Code § 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio, or television it states that the defendant found guilty is subject to punishment up to 30 years in prison and carries a fine up to $1,000,000. The punishment can be either one or both.
As it relates to the violation of 18 U.S. Code § 2326 - Enhanced penalties, it states that the defendant found guilty is subject to punishment up to 10 years in prison. (Legal Information Institute, n.d.)

Sentencing guidelines state the following information as listed below:

§2B1.1. Larceny, Embezzlement, and Other Forms of Theft; Offenses Involving Stolen Property; Property Damage or Destruction; Fraud and Deceit; Forgery; Offenses Involving Altered or Counterfeit Instruments Other than Counterfeit Bearer Obligations of the United States

(a) Base Offense Level:

(1) 7, if (A) the defendant was convicted of an offense referenced to this guideline; and (B) that offense of conviction has a statutory maximum term of imprisonment of 20 years or more; or

(2) 6, otherwise.

(b) Specific Offense Characteristics

(1) If the loss exceeded $5,000, increase the offense level as follows:

Loss (Apply the Greatest) Increase in Level
(A) $5,000 or…...

Similar Documents

Sentencing Paper

...Sentencing Paper Sentencing is really important in the criminal justice system. There are many reasons for sentencing in the United States. Sentencing is the result of punishment from the court. The major reasons for punishment is retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, compensation, and reform. The type of punishment for crimes has been debated by different leaders and law makers for centuries. The punishment for reform is intended to help the offender and society to change the wrongdoer a chance to contribute to society. The punishment for deterrence is intended to benefit society by preventing offenders that would-be from committing a crime. Punishment to extract compensation is intended to benefit the victim of the offender. Finally, retribution is the only object for punishment that is primarily intended to harm the offender. Individuals are sentenced to prison because they broke the rules and would have to serve their time. There are different sentencing guidelines for state and federal prisons. When a person has either pleaded guilty or has been found guilty of a crime, a judge has to decide a sentence that the offender must receive. Sentencing is imposing a criminal sanction by a judicial authority. Each year there are thousands of criminals that appear before a judge or judges to be sentenced for their crimes committed. Sentencing descriptions are primarily for felony offenses, or those that are punishable by less than one year......

Words: 1115 - Pages: 5

Punishment and Sentencing

...Punishment and Sentencing Brian Krail CJA/234 11/20/2011 Punishment and Sentencing Crimes against morality and individual rights have existed since the dawn of man as well as the need to punishment those crimes. Public consciousness and sentiment have evolved over time and greatly influence the goals of modern-day punishment criminals. The legal and correctional systems tend to fall in line with this morals and concepts of their respective era. While threat of prison and punishment may be deterrence to crime, the goals of punishment and sentencing can be placed into the categories of rehabilitation, retributions and incapacitation. Through the classification of crimes and prisoners, the modern-day correctional system emphasizes a hybrid mix of these objectives based on the severity of the crime and susceptibility of the criminal. Incapacitation as a goal or strategy in punishment and sentencing is best focused on those offenders who commit crimes at very high rates. By taking a large slice of out of the life of a career criminal, the punishment has prevented, in theory, the number of crimes that individual, would have been committed if that while in society. Since the 1980’s, the United States has increasingly taken a this approach which has led to increased sentences for the majority of offenders also leading to prison overcrowding. The effectiveness of this strategy is often debated although many of not most studies conclude this strategy does......

Words: 818 - Pages: 4

Sentencing Guidelines

...The Impact of Sentencing Guidelines on the Criminal Justice System Public Safety Capstone Project Our criminal justice system has an obligation to impose fair sentences. The United States Sentencing Commission is the result of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 that had laws created to ensure that sentencing was fair from state to state, and a judge provided proof of that sentencing was indeed black and white. To eliminate the possibility of being unjust, the government became involved in creating guidelines on the punishment that was rendered based on the type or types of crimes an individual committed. Sentencing guidelines were imposed to set the terms that would fit the crime some of the sentencing may be a payment of a fine, community service, incarceration, the death penalty, and or probation and parole. Throughout the years there has been a concentrated effort to standardize the sentencing especially in felony offenses, and to diminish judicial discretion in sentencing. Due to this there is a perception by lawmakers and the public that arbitrary or discriminatory practice with fair and just sentencing in certain cases and or crimes. “The Federal Government and 16 States have implemented presumptive or voluntary/advisory sentencing guidelines. Each of these states has established guidelines for different purposes and most of them were asked to meet multiple goals, including punishment, deterrence, incapacitation, and......

Words: 1686 - Pages: 7

Sentencing Paper

...Sentencing in America Jim Harper CJA/234 March-25, 2013 Mary Walker Sentencing in America Trials in America can be lengthy process. Even when there is a large amount of evidence against a defendant, the trial process may still carry on for months or even years. In the end, however, there must be a verdict. That verdict will either be innocent or guilty. If the defendant is found innocent he or she can be set free. However, if the defendant if the defendant is found guilty he or she must be sentenced. The sentencing aspect of the trial process belongs to the judge. The judge must weigh many factors before handing down the sentence. The judge must determine a fair and proper sentence to fit the crime. Too much may spark outrage in the public, as will too light of a sentence. The judge must find a way to serve true justice to the defendant. However, generally no matter what the sentence is, someone will be dissatisfied. Over the next few paragraph, how these sentences affect the correction system and the overall objective will be examined. The difference between in determinate and indeterminate sentencing will also be examined. Objective and Effects of Sentencing The overall goal of sentencing a person is to deter future criminal acts. Some people believe that inmates should be sentenced for rehabilitation, whereas others believe in strictly deterrence. With America’s “tough on crime” stance, the model tends to......

Words: 774 - Pages: 4

Sentencing

... Sentencing Paper When it comes to punishment the State and Federal government handle things not to different from each other. Sentencing in both systems are not too different from each other also. In this paper I will look at the objectives of punishments by the State and Federal systems. We will also look at how sentencing affects State and Federal correction systems. I will also look at determinate and indeterminate sentencing. The definition of punishment according to the Merriam Webster dictionary is the act of punishing, suffering, pain or loss that serves as retribution and a penalty inflicted on an offender through judicial procedure. The mission of corrections has always been to court prescribed sentences for criminals or to carry the sentence of the court. When an offender is sentenced it is usually for one or more reasons. It is either deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and or restitution. Deterrence is the goal that is focused on preventing future crimes from happening. The idea is that if criminal receive punishment it would prevent them and others they know from committing crimes. Incapacitation is when you reduce the criminal capacity or intent to commit a crime. Rehabilitation is when you release an inmate back to society with more to offer themselves and the community before they committed the crime. Restitution is when you repay your debt to society financially. This sometimes happens if damaged occurred during the crime. Sentencing......

Words: 445 - Pages: 2

Sentencing

...Sentencing can be defined as "the judicial determination of a legal sanction to be imposed on a person found guilty of an offence." It is one of several stages, which together comprise what is often referred to as the criminal justice system, although some might argue that it is an overstatement to categorize such disparate functions as a system. These stages are: (A) Crime prevention and maintenance of order (B) Detection and enforcement (including investigation) (C) Prosecution (D) Adjudication (E) Sentencing/disposition (F) Administration of sentences/dispositions. Generally speaking the branches of central government have the dominant role in most of the above, although a number of qualifications should be mentioned. Individuals retain the right to institute private prosecutions at the summary level. In jury trials, members of the public are the determiners of fact and private organizations or individuals often have an important role in the administration of certain sentences. Under our system of government the police take principal responsibility for stages (a) and (b); the police and crown prosecutors for stage (c); the courts (particularly judicial officers) for (d) and (e); and courts, prisons, and community corrections for (f). These agencies all operate within rules, which allow a significant amount of discretion to the officers involved. Increasingly, they are also purchasing contract services from non-government agencies and community......

Words: 613 - Pages: 3

Truth in Sentencing Laws Do Not Deter Crime

...Opening Argument: Truth in Sentencing Laws do not Deter Crime Truth in sentencing was developed to keep inmates (especially more violent) to serve 85% or more of their initial time in prison. Although it is to insure the safety and builds a better relationship within society, there can be some negative outcomes such as the availability of plea bargaining to receive lesser sentences or inmates who are serving their complete sentence have the inability to adapt to society once released. Using the plea bargaining system has saved a lot of time and money for the court work group because of the willingness of the suspect to forfeit their freedom whereas a person proceeds to trial and receive a harsher term “…more than 90 percent of all criminal cases do not go to trial because the offender pleads guilty to a lesser charge. Even violent crimes are routinely plea-bargained--an estimated 77 percent of rape cases, 85 percent of aggravated assault cases, and 87 percent of robbery cases.” (Anne Morrison Piehl, 1995) . Piehl and DiIulio explained that criminals almost always have the option to discuss a plea bargain to avoid trial, and also prosecutors are more than willing to proceed with the deal because it cuts time on their work load as well as reduce the funding to conduct these trials. In most cases, people eventually adapt to their environment. In cases when a person is in prison, he/she have molded to the familiar everyday lifestyle that comes with it. “A stronger penalty......

Words: 431 - Pages: 2

Sentencing

...were drinking and driving. Celebrities are let off with a slap of the wrist for crimes that are sometimes violent just because they are whom they are. This country is run on how much money or power a person has and if you do not meet those two pieces of criteria then you will get a higher sentence then the person that does have money or power. The judge in this case did his job and sent a message to others in the Baltimore area that animal cruelty is not tolerated with in that county. The main problem still is why some people are getting insignificant punishments crimes while others are getting severe punishments. The article states that in 2011 there was a high school wrestler that got all but six days of his ten-year sentence suspended for breaking another person’s jaw while he should have spent most of that in jail. The other case that the article talks about is a judge suspending a twenty-year sentence for a mother that admitted to starving her son to death. This should have been an automatic life sentence or a capital crime but she has to go home after admitting to murder. The question for this why these people got to go home for aggravated assault and murder when a Baltimore cop is spending a year in jail for killing a dog? Sometimes there are certain circumstances that are not reported to the media and therefore the public never knows about. The facts that are in the article about these two crimes are enough for me to think that these two people should have spent more......

Words: 762 - Pages: 4

"The Only Factor That a Judge Should Consider When Sentencing Is the Nature of the Crime Committed”. Discuss the Validity of This Statement.

...should consider when sentencing is the nature of the crime committed”. Discuss the validity of this statement. The Criminal Law (Sentencing Act) 1988 determines that during the process of sentencing an offender, the nature of any indictable offence must be taken into account by a judge, along with a range of aggravating and mitigating factors. Essentially the judge must order a sentence that is fair considering the gravity of the offence and the particular circumstances of the offender; this is known as the "principle of proportionality". Comprised of objective and subjective factors, aggravation and mitigation factors often encompass key aspects of a judge's ruling - as evident in most sentencing remarks; they play a pivotal role in ensuring that each guilty individual is sentenced appropriately. As outlined in section 29A of the South Australian Criminal Law (Sentencing Act) of 1988, the court may “indicate an appropriate range of penalties for a particular offence or offences of a particular class” and “indicate how particular aggravating or mitigating factors (or aggravating or mitigating factors of a particular kind) should be reflected in sentence.” True justice, in terms of sentencing, can only be achieved if consideration is given to the offender's criminal history, personal circumstances, and post-crime actions: the nature of the offender as well as the nature of the crime must be considered by the judge. As made apparent by most sentencing remarks, alongside......

Words: 1542 - Pages: 7

Sentencing

...Sentencing Brittany N Mann CJA/234 September 4, 2011 Barbara Carroll, PhD. Sentencing laws in the United States corrections vary, depending on the objectives set at the state and federal levels. Sentencing guidelines provide structure at the criminal sentencing stage by defining offense and offender elements that should be considered in each case to determine the correct sentence. There are four justifications for punishment in the United States; the four principal objectives of punishment are traditionally stated as retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation ,and incapacitation. There are many factors that determine what form of punishment you receive. The factors include the type of crime committed and previous criminal history. The state objectives for punishment are applied to misdemeanors, and the federal objective for punishment is only for felonies and serious misdemeanors. The principal objectives for punishment are retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation and incapacitation. Retribution is the justification punishment in which the offender is given a sentence that is vengeful, this given to make the offender suffer for the crime committed, to also make the offender morally responsible for the offender to...

Words: 780 - Pages: 4

Sentencing Paper

... Sentencing Paper Joan Hamm CJA 234 October 12, 2015 Dennis Holder Sentencing Paper An analysis of the state and federal objectives of punishment are the consequences or penalties for a crime(s) that have been committed.   The punishment ensures that the offender is adequately punished for the offences they are being accused of. The implementation of punishment is to prevent the criminal behavior by deterring the offender from committing similar offences. Usually punishment applies to the offender per the crime that has been committed (Hamilton, 2014). If the accused is a repeat offender of federal crime then they go to a federal prison, for almost every other crime the offender goes to a state prison.  A prison-- whether it be state or federal, main objectives is preventing and controlling criminal behavior and acts. There are seven usual punishments depending on the judge’s and/or the jury’s decision at trial (Hamilton, 2014). The minimum sentences like Intensive supervision such as: parole, house arrest, probation, etc., Rehabilitation such as: counseling, drug rehab, restitution, community service, fines, etc.  On the contrary, more sever punishments include: capital punishment and incarceration.  This type of sentencing is imposed as a criminal sanction by a judicial authority. Mandatory minimums, such as: the three strikes laws and sentencing guidelines require specific sentences. It is done with little consideration of personal factors as it pertains to offenders,......

Words: 1267 - Pages: 6

Sentencing

...Sentencing laws in the United States corrections vary, depending on the objectives set at the state and federal levels. Sentencing guidelines provide structure at the criminal sentencing stage by defining offense and offender elements that should be considered in each case to determine the correct sentence. There are four justifications for punishment in the United States; the four principal objectives of punishment are traditionally stated as retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation, and incapacitation. There are many factors that determine what form of punishment you receive. The factors include the type of crime committed and previous criminal history. The state objectives for punishment are applied to misdemeanors, and the federal objective for punishment is only for felonies and serious misdemeanors. The principal objectives for punishment are retribution, deterrence, rehabilitation and incapacitation. Retribution is the justification punishment in which the offender is given a sentence that is vengeful, this given to make the offender suffer for the crime committed, to also make the offender morally responsible for the offender to accept responsibility for their actions. Retribution is also done to show others that the crime committed will not be tolerated. Deterrence is a justification punishment that is given with the intent of discouraging members of society from committing criminal acts out of fear of punishment. Rehabilitation is the justification punishment that......

Words: 686 - Pages: 3

Sentencing Paper

...Sentencing Paper Tushar Vincent Botlero 12 March 2012 CJ/A-234 Melissa Andrewjeski Sentencing Paper  Punishment has been a subject of deliberate among philosophers, political leaders, and lawyers for centuries. Various theories of punishment have been developed, each of which attempts to justify the practice in some form and to state its proper objectives. The quantity and severity of punishments were reduced, the prison system have been improved. According to the Montgomery County Correctional Facility, Maryland, some of the major reasons for punishment are to reform, deterrence, rehabilitation, compensation, and retribution. Punishment for reform is intended to benefit the offender and society by changing the offender into a contributor to society. Punishment as deterrence is intended to benefit society by discouraging would-be offenders. Punishment to extract compensation is intended to benefit the victim of the offender. Finally, retribution is the only object for punishment that is primarily intended to harm the offender. Individuals are in prison because they broke the rules and would have to serve their time.   Some go to federal prison and some go to state prisons.   It depends on the type of crime that a person commits because these prisons harbor different types of criminals they also have different guidelines to follow in terms to punishing the inmates.   Criminal offenders who benefit from prevention services and are at risk of......

Words: 1251 - Pages: 6

Sentencing

...Sentencing. Sentencing May 20th , 2012 Sentencing is a major issue in our criminal justice system today. Here in the U.S, our courts have always struggled to maintain goals and balance our policies when it comes to criminal sentencing. Although the Eighth Amendment guarantees proportionality in noncapital criminal sentencing, federal and state courts have struggled when deciding individual cases, and the Supreme Court has failed to articulate legal rules that could promote the development of a coherent jurisprudence ( Lippman, 2007). Working within the governing law and building on the work already done by scholars who have focused on this problem. There are three principles: transparency, limited deference, and a "felt sense of justice," that could guide the process of proportionality review and contribute to defining a retributivist touchstone for proportionality judgments (Lippman, 2007). The Death Penalty. The death penalty in the United States is used almost exclusively for the crime of murder. Although state and federal statutes contain various capital crimes other than those involving the death of the victim, only two people were on death row for a non-murder offense (Victor L. Streib, 2004). No one has been executed for such a crime since the death penalty was re-instated in 1976. In 1977, the U.S. Supreme Court in Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584, held that the death penalty for the rape of an adult was "grossly......

Words: 1283 - Pages: 6

Criminal Sentencing

...L. Elise Bowling Criminal Sentencing CRJ 301 Juvenile Justice Timothy Koester September 20, 2010 Criminal Sentencing Over the years, there has been great debate over the purpose of sentencing criminals, but it generally all boils down to the importance of deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retribution. All four plays an important role in sentencing, and each vary on a case-by-case basis. As far as the purpose of criminal sentencing goes, it is imperative that all courts are on the same page and strive to achieve the same outcome. Due to the ever-changing society we live in, there has always been controversy as to what the right objective was for the criminal when it comes to punishment. For long time rehabilitation was the focus in criminal sentencing, but that proved to fail due to the increase of recidivism. Now it seems that the main focus of criminal sentencing is incapacitation, which hopefully leads to deterrence, rehabilitation, or retribution. It is clear that information on the outcomes of sentences and their cost must play a crucial role in deciding the relative importance of deterrence, incapacitation, rehabilitation, and retribution (Justice). When the criminal court system focuses on incapacitation for the offender, it does so for many reasons. There are many that feel future crime can be prevented if the criminal is locked up and physically restrained. One aspect of this is the approach to......

Words: 700 - Pages: 3