Premium Essay

Serial Killer Trends: Ted Bundy And John Wayne Gacy

Submitted By
Words 381
Pages 2
Reflection: Jeffrey Dahmer seemed like an average man. Growing up he was a little shy but relatively normal. He had a difficult upbringing because his parents was very tough on him, causing him to be socially awkward. His escalation of deviance could be recognized at young young age when he began to develop a sexual fascination with dead animals. During his time in high school he began to have thoughts of killing another person. To deal with his problems he developed a drinking problem while still in high school. Just after his graduation in 1978 he murdered his first victim. When disposing of the bodies he was pulled over by the police and question however he was able to talk his way out of it. His killing spree would continue until his arrest …show more content…
Dahmer had difficulty socially following his parents divorce. Ted Bundy grew up without a father, he lived his life being lied to about his father identity, when he discovered this he was very angry. John Wayne Gacy grew up in an abusive home, he struggled seeking the approval of his father. Another similarity between these three killer was early thoughts of fetishism. All three of these men participated in necrophilia, and all had unusual sexual fantasies from a young age. Another similarity between the three men was they were charismatic. For Dahmer when one of his victims escaped naked, he convinced them that they were just drinking and that they had a consensual relationship. While bundy was in prison he behaved so well that guards often left him unattended. This eventually lead to his escape showing that he was a master manipulator. For Gacy on multiple occasions when he was questioned about raping young boys he was able to convince police that they were all consensual relationships. This shows that many serial killers share similar traits with each

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Serial Killers, the Media and America’s Fascination

...Serial Killers, The Media and America’s Fascination Turn on the television in any given evening and you can catch an episode or 20 of any number of crime shows (and all of their spin-offs) that showcases an intricate plot and horrific crimes. It is not uncommon for the viewer to get “sucked” into the storyline and then become personally invested in the outcome of the story. I often wonder what it is about theses crime shows and psychological thriller series that keep the viewer’s tuning in. What’s s the draw? Not only do we become drawn in, but at some point we even become infatuated with the subject matter and long to see more. Have was as a society completely lost all sense of right and wrong or has the media desensitized us to the realities of serial murderers? Defining the Serial Killer. In order to pinpoint the progression of fascination with serial killers, it is important to first establish a working definition of the term. The FBI’s Behavioral Science Unit defines serial killings as “the unlawful killing of two or more victims by the same offender(s), in separate (Morton). Generally the classification of serial murder is accompanied by the length of time between kills, or the “cooling off period.” In addition, the killer is usually a stranger to the victim and the murders appear to be unconnected or random. The FBI is credited with establishing this term, and by doing so, achieved a position of unquestioned authority in defining serial murders. Serial Killers...

Words: 1853 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Serial Killer

...VOLUME EDITOR S. WALLER is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Montana State University Bozeman. Her areas of research are philosophy of neurology, philosophy of cognitive ethology (especially dolphins, wolves, and coyotes), and philosophy of mind, specifically the parts of the mind we disavow. SERIES EDITOR FRITZ ALLHOFF is an Assistant Professor in the Philosophy Department at Western Michigan University, as well as a Senior Research Fellow at the Australian National University’s Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics. In addition to editing the Philosophy for Everyone series, Allhoff is the volume editor or co-editor for several titles, including Wine & Philosophy (Wiley-Blackwell, 2007), Whiskey & Philosophy (with Marcus P. Adams, Wiley, 2009), and Food & Philosophy (with Dave Monroe,Wiley-Blackwell, 2007). P H I L O S O P H Y F O R E V E RYO N E Series editor: Fritz Allhoff Not so much a subject matter, philosophy is a way of thinking.Thinking not just about the Big Questions, but about little ones too.This series invites everyone to ponder things they care about, big or small, significant, serious … or just curious. Running & Philosophy: A Marathon for the Mind Edited by Michael W. Austin Wine & Philosophy: A Symposium on Thinking and Drinking Edited by Fritz Allhoff Food & Philosophy: Eat,Think and Be Merry Edited by Fritz Allhoff and Dave Monroe Beer & Philosophy: The Unexamined Beer Isn’t Worth Drinking Edited by Steven D. Hales Whiskey & Philosophy:...

Words: 90119 - Pages: 361