Should Capital Punishment Be Abolished or Retained

In: Social Issues

Submitted By jinluo
Words 2159
Pages 9
Jin Law
Professor Moss
ENGL 1301
April 21, 2009

Should capital punishment be abolished or retained?


Capital punishment, or the death penalty, has been using for thousands of years. In the last two centuries, as people have realized the importance of human rights, debates over capital punishment have never stopped. More and more people join the campaign against capital punishment, while the others defend it. However, either abolishing the death penalty or retaining it has inextricable problems. The writer’s opinion is that capital punishment will vanish from this planet someday in the future, but for a long span of time from now, to abolish it or not depends on the social situations of different countries.
People who are against capital punishment, and advocate replacing it with lifetime imprisonment, list five reasons why they condemn it. Right to life is the first punch. In The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 3 says, “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person” (1). Among all the human rights, right to life is the cornerstone and the carrier of all the other human rights. Deprivation of the right to life is equivalent to deprivation of all the rights, which is inhumane in modern society.
On the other hand, capital punishment is a product of the old barbaric concept “an eye for an eye, a life for a life;” and it is actually vengeance killing. Nowadays, most societies do not agree with vengeance killing. Such a brute act does nothing but more harm. Criminals should be punished, rather than being killed for vengeance. In Europe, capital punishment is simply considered savage and has vanished from this continent. Even in some developing countries, such as Mexico, capital punishment has been abolished. In the process of civilization, as the consciousness of protecting human rights is woken, more people will discard…...

Similar Documents

Capital Punishment

...Capital Punishment Capital Punishment is a very controversial issue in our society today. Nobody should have the power to be able to punish somebody to death besides God. We also are running the risk of putting wrongly convicted innocents to death for crimes they did not commit. We must discontinue the capital punishment penalty and work to come up with alternatives to this horrific travesty. The government should not be allowed to kill those convicted of capital crimes. Who are we to determine who lives or who dies? Nobody. For us to kill killers does not make us any better than killers ourselves. Another reason to rethink capital punishment is because of the chance of executing wrongly convicted innocents. You can sentence somebody wrongly to life in prison and release them, but you can not give someone their life back after you take it from them. We, the people, should work to find adequate solutions to the death penalty. To kill somebody actually costs substantially more than to imprison them for a life term. “The costs include $717,000 on attorneys who defend suspects, $353,000 was for defense attorneys’ private investigators, $591,000 was for expert witnesses, and $61,000 was for mental health exams (Foster, 1999). It is said that it costs more to enforce capital punishment than it is to put someone in prison for life. Another argument is if the people on death row are innocent, it would be wrong to put them to death.” (“Capital”)...

Words: 251 - Pages: 2

Should Capital Punishment Be Abolished or Retained

...Jin Law Professor Moss ENGL 1301 April 21, 2009 Should capital punishment be abolished or retained? Capital punishment, or the death penalty, has been using for thousands of years. In the last two centuries, as people have realized the importance of human rights, debates over capital punishment have never stopped. More and more people join the campaign against capital punishment, while the others defend it. However, either abolishing the death penalty or retaining it has inextricable problems. The writer’s opinion is that capital punishment will vanish from this planet someday in the future, but for a long span of time from now, to abolish it or not depends on the social situations of different countries. People who are against capital punishment, and advocate replacing it with lifetime imprisonment, list five reasons why they condemn it. Right to life is the first punch. In The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 3 says, “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person” (1). Among all the human rights, right to life is the cornerstone and the carrier of all the other human rights. Deprivation of the right to life is equivalent to deprivation of all the rights, which is inhumane in modern society. On the other hand, capital punishment is a product of the old barbaric concept “an eye for an eye, a life for a life;” and it is actually vengeance killing. Nowadays, most societies do not agree with vengeance killing. Such a brute...

Words: 2159 - Pages: 9

Capital Punishment

...Capital Punishment is the legal infliction of death as a penalty for violating criminal law. It has been around for thousands of years and still continues to execute people today. Capital Punishment is inhumane and in some cases sentences the innocent to death. It is obviously the most severe form of criminal punishment. Being morally unjust, the purpose of it has no significance. Killing a person for their wrongdoings does not in anyway help our society. Capital Punishment must be abolished. Capital Punishment originated in Ancient Times. The first evidence of capital punishment is from Hammurabi’s Code, a book of Babylonian Law, from 1700 B.C. Hammurabi himself suggested: “an eye for an eye a tooth for a tooth.” Jesus Christ was crucified on the cross. This is one form of capital punishment. The bible talks about capital punishment. One example of capital punishment in the bible is “Whoever strikes a man so that he dies shall be put to death” (Exodus 21:12). It also suggest stoning a woman is she has unmarried sex. By the end of the 15th century, England had recognized 7 major crimes that deserved the death penalty. Throughout the 1800’s more than 200 crimes were recognized as punishable by death. Many countries in our present day world applied the death penalty throughout the past. Some reasons for the death penalty include betraying the King or Queen, going against ones religion, cheating on your spouse, theft, murder, burglary, rape, and arson. Also, in early Egypt one...

Words: 479 - Pages: 2

Should Capital Punishment Be Abolished?

... capital punishment is abolished, we can hardly even call ourselves a first world country. I understand the argument that the death penalty provides closure to the victim’s families who have suffered and grieved tremendously. But sometimes, I feel that as a society, we have to move away from the “eye for an eye” revenge mentality if civilisation were to advance4. Dishing out the death penalty to the prisoner does not rectify the problem, and certainly does not bring the victim back to life. In fact, all it does is to place the prisoner’s families in the same position as the victim’s; losing a loved one. Not to mention the emotional and mental trauma of going through the entire appealing process which may take up to several years, the impact on the prisoner’s families are as unbearable as it could be. Why double the suffering when we don't have to? Only a cold and heartless human can say that all these is worth it as the prisoner deserves it. Opposing the death penalty does not indicate a lack of sympathy for the victims, but rather, indicates a lack of sympathy for human life. Nobody is perfect. Not you, not me, and certainly not the justice system we have in place. And that brings me to my next point, wrongful execution. More often than not, evidences are used in court hearings to substantiate and prosecute those who are guilty. However, can there be without a doubt that the convicted is guilty as charged? After all, it was claimed that there ‘have been as many as 39......

Words: 1559 - Pages: 7

Minimum Should Be Abolished

... the workers have all the information they need. In addition to having all the information, a minimum wage restricts workers from setting the price for their own labor. It is a worker’s right to set his or her own price. Given that workers have all the necessary information at their finger tips; thank to the improved technology, they should be given a chance to set their own labor price depending on demand and supply. The government can assist workers by ensuring that the workers unions are well regulated and supported to give a voice to the workers hence making the minimum wage unnecessary and obsolete. A minimum wage sets a barrier to start up and small businesses from the ability to hire workers. Start up and small business do not have a high enough business activity to pay wages above the minimum wage to all its employees unlike the big and large enough businesses that already enjoy economies of scale. A minimum wage suffocates small businesses and yet they are the backbone of our economy. In addition to setting a barrier to small businesses, a minimum wage also sets a barrier to workers. Low productivity workers for example low skilled workers and workers with disabilities will hardly find a business willing to hire them. Education is a barrier to skilled workers and the minimum wage is the equivalent barrier to unskilled and disables workers. The minimum wage is a barrier which creates unemployment for these groups for people and must therefore be abolished. With......

Words: 982 - Pages: 4

Capital Punishment

...If there are people who are in favor of capital punishment, there are also those who want it to be abolished. According to the Abolitionists, capital punishment is nothing but an act of violence. There is nothing more inhumane than tolerating the killing of another human being. It is indeed very ironic that the state will allow the execution of a human person as a solution to crime and violence. Violence will never be the right solution to the rising criminality. When the society tolerates execution as a solution to criminality, in effect, we are leaving an imprint on the minds of the youth that the proper approach to violence is to impose violence. Thus, the Abolitionists argue that capital punishment should be abolished because it degrades the value of human life. Capital punishment is also perceived to be beneficial for the society because it deters the criminal from committing another crime and it prevents the other criminals from committing the same crime. It must however be emphasized that until now there has been no scientific literature that will prove that there is a causal connection or a cause and effect relationship between capital punishment and the commission of a crime. The third objection against capital punishment is that it is always possible that an inmate who is on death row may turn out to be innocent. There are flaws in every criminal justice system. The result is that we have a justice system wherein only those who can afford the......

Words: 275 - Pages: 2

Capital Punishment

...There are people that are pro capital punishment and there are people who are strongly against capital punishment. Capital punishment is defined as the most extreme sentencing option. (Schmalleger, 2011) Capital punishment is typically used for capital offenses which are offenses that are punishable by death. (Schmalleger, 2011) Capital punishment has become one of the most talked about topics, some people argue that the death penalty is an effective deterrent of crime while others argue that the death penalty is not consistently applied and claims the life of many innocent people. There is no question on whether or not the people who commit heinous crimes should be punished to the fullest extent of the law because they should. However, I for one am against the death penalty and feel that it should be abolished. Prior to this assignment I thought that maybe I was for capital punishment but when I actually sat down and thought about whether or not this was an effective deterrent of crime the answer on where I stood was clearer. Capital punishment would only be affective if it was consistently applied to crime. Although 38 states still have the death penalty there is still a consistent amount of crime in each state. If the death penalty was adequately applied I believe that the crime rate would probably go down because criminals would then understand the severity of the crimes they commit and the consequence for that crime. However, this is not the only reason I feel that......

Words: 352 - Pages: 2

Should America Continue to Use Capital Punishment

...Heather Burrus GE 217 11/27/13 Project Part E Should America Continue to Use Capital Punishment? Capital punishment can have many different affects on people, depending on the circumstances at hand. No one really knows if they are for or against capital punishment until something personally happens to them or a family member which makes them see the issue in a whole different light. My own personal experience has made me look at capital punishment a completely different way. I have very mixed emotions on the death penalty; a part of me believes that if a person takes another person’s life that they should get the death penalty and than there is the other part of me that believes that the person should spend the rest of their life in prison without parole, so they can suffer the consequences of there actions. There are numerous families and loved ones of murder victims that support alternatives to the death penalty for many reasons. For instance, the death penalty process has a traumatizing experience on the families, which is often requires them to relive the pain and suffering of the death of their loved one for many years. Having life without parole provides certain punishment without the endless reopening of wounds. “There are hundreds of millions of dollars that are spent on the death penalty each year. If we were to replace the death penalty with life in prison without parole, we would save million of dollars which than could be...

Words: 985 - Pages: 4

Capital Punishment Should Be Stopped

... the death penalty should be abolished. The facts are given bellow: Denial of basic right: According to Humans Right Association capital punishment overrules our most basic human right the right to life. Human life has fundamental value. The blessedness of human life is denied by the death penalty. Live is precious. This is very similar to the ‘value of life’ argument, but approached from the perspective of human rights. The possibility of error: The most common and most cogent argument against capital punishment is that sooner or later, innocent people will get killed, because of mistakes or flaws in the justice system. Later investigations revealed many convicted individuals innocent which got death penalty in the past, and have been pardoned. Unfair Judgment: In many death penalty cases the defendants remain poorly represented or not represented at all because of their poverty, which cause greater injustice. It also notices a kind of racial discrimination this happens due to varied reasons. Because the poor can offer very low compensation the defense lawyers are often incompetent, resulting in losing the case. Due to prejudice and bias, poor people, and people from minority sections become soft target for such capital punishments, as unrestricted discretion has offered to District attorney. If any one wants to appeal then it becomes a burdensome process for him often resulting in denial of justice. Justifying circumstances: Sometimes, persons suffering from emotional...

Words: 3503 - Pages: 15

Capital Punishment Should Be Illegal

...Capital Punishment Should Be Illegal Capital Punishment Should Be Illegal Capital punishment has been legal, illegal, and as of now is legal again, under certain circumstances and depending on the location. These circumstances can vary from state to state and the federal government may also decide they have grounds to seek capital punishment, even if the crime is in a state that doesn’t allow the death penalty. With such uncertainty about whether capital punishment should be legal or illegal, it is important to take a closer look at some of the reasons why it should be illegal which include; the risk of innocent people being executed, evidence of racial bias in regards to sentencing for the death penalty, and the cost of the death penalty in comparison to the cost of life in prison without parole. In the end you will see that an eye for an eye is not the answer. Bedau set out to provide the information to show why the death penalty should be illegal. Bedau started out looking at the questions that have caused argument throughout the years in regard to the death penalty. The questions he sought to answer were: Is the death penalty more of a deterrent than imprisonment, is there racial bias when it comes to administering the death penalty, what are the risk that someone who is innocent could be prosecuted, and what is the risk that someone who is convicted of a capital offense will commit again? During Bedau’s research to determine if capital punishment is no more of a...

Words: 911 - Pages: 4

Capital Punishment

...Pros and Cons of Capital Punishment Capital punishment is a topic that anyone can count on to stir emotional discussions with plenty of opinions. In the world today, people commit horrific crimes daily. There are many who feel that those who carry out these terrible crimes deserve one fate: death. Capital punishment is used in reference to the death penalty that is issued in a judicial manner to execute those found guilty of a capital or hard offense. This according to our text is called legal punishment. Legal punishment is defined as the state-authorized imposition of some form of deprivation-of liberty, resources, or even life-upon a person justly convicted of a violation of the criminal law. (Stohr, pg 3) In this review of the pros and cons of the death penalty we will examine some different aspects of the process and allow the reader to form their own opinion. History The death penalty can be traced back a long time throughout history. The first established death penalty laws date back to the Eighteenth Century B.C. In the code of King Hammaurabi of Babylon, which gave the death penalty for 25 different crimes. This code expressed the well-known concept of lex talionis (the law of equal retaliation), which is further enunciated in the Mosaic code, the ancient law of the Hebrews, as “an eye for an eye; a tooth for a tooth.” (Stohr, pg. 3) During the 18th century, many philosophers like Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham wrote influential writings on...

Words: 1654 - Pages: 7

Capital Punishment

...Sam LaMotte Intro to Ethics November 29th 2015 Should the death penalty be abolished or retained? Capital punishment, or the death penalty, has been using for thousands of years. In the last two centuries, as people have realized the importance of human rights, debates over capital punishment have never stopped. More and more people join the campaign against capital punishment, while the others defend it. However, either abolishing the death penalty or retaining it has inextricable problems. My opinion is that capital punishment will vanish from this planet someday in the future, but for a long span of time from now, to abolish it or not depends on the social situations of different countries. People, who are against capital punishment, and advocate replacing it with lifetime imprisonment, list five reasons why they condemn it. Right to life is the first punch. In The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the constitution states, “Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of person”. Among all the human rights, right to life is the cornerstone and the carrier of all the other human rights. Deprivation of the right to life is equivalent to deprivation of all the rights, which is inhumane in modern society. On the other hand, capital punishment is a product of the old barbaric concept “an eye for an eye, a life for a life;” and it is actually vengeance killing. Nowadays, most societies do not agree with vengeance killing. Such a brute act does nothing but......

Words: 320 - Pages: 2

Capital Punishment

...Is Capital Punishment the correct sentence for a murderer? I will be discussing in my essay whether Capital Punishment should stay abolished or be reintroduced after 38 years since the punishment was banned. Capital punishment is a form of taking someone's life in order to repay for the crime that they have committed. There are many different methods of doing this, for example a few of them are such things as The Electric Chair, Hanging, Stretching, Stoning. Since 1965 people have been saying that Capital Punishment should be reintroduced. I will be stating most of the reasons these people give in the next few paragraphs. One of these reasons is the fact that prisons are getting overcrowded in England. There are over two thousand convicted persons serving life sentences in our prisons today, therefore if we were to reintroduce Capital Punishment we could resolve these problems by sentencing the people who would at present be sent to prison for life to the death penalty as a punishment for doing wrong. Another common point that is made is that with so many people in our prisons it actually costs us money due to taxing. And as I said before prisons are overcrowded plus every person serving a life sentence costs £400-£1000 each per week depending on the amount of security that they need and this is coming out of money that we work hard for. So without all those criminals we would be living better lives due to the fact that we...

Words: 1499 - Pages: 6

Should Capital Punishment Be Reintroduced?

...Capital punishment is actively practiced in 58 countries and 35 countries have abolished it de facto. The death penalty has in the past been practiced by most societies as a punishment for murder, political or religious dissidents. Yet, since the 19th century tolerance and respect for life has become of great importance. In this essay I will seek to answer if capital punishment should be reintroduced. Some people say that capital punishment acts as a deterrent. Facing this punishment a murderer may think twice before committing the crime. If one takes somebody’s life he has forfeit his own right to life. However, statistics show that crime rates in countries that practice capital punishment have not gone down. In fact, the United Stated murder rate is 6 times bigger than that of Britain or Australia. Neither country has the death penalty. Texas and Oklahoma have historically executed the most number of inmates who were sentenced to death, though in 2003 their murder rate was higher than the national average. ”I have never heard a murderer say they thought about the death penalty as consequence of their actions prior to committing their crimes” says Gregory Ruff, police lieutenant in Kansas. The life imprisonment, for some anti-death penalty activists, would be the best way to deter crime. On the other hand, assaults in prisons all over the US have more than doubled in the past decade, according to statistics gathered by the Criminal Justice Institute in Middletown...

Words: 696 - Pages: 3

Capital Punishment

.... • Death sentence should be abolished as a capital punishment. Lifelong rigorous imprisonment should be executed as an alternative of death sentence. For this, we should improve the infrastructure of custody system. • It is the duty of the government to provide security for all individuals. Therefore, it is only a necessity, but also an obligation to get rid of those who impose threat or harm to any individual. Capital punishment is not always the most appropriate solution, but given the circumstances, it may be the most effective way to deal with criminals who threaten society. Conclusion There are many things in this society which should be banned, but the death penalty or capital punishment is not one of them. It is definitely the right way to go as far as capital discipline is concerned. Right now in our country, it is outrageous that criminals think that they can get away with just about anything. In some states, the capital punishment has helped them lower the rate of violent crimes. We need some form of capital punishment to send a message to career criminals that they will not get away with these severe crimes. The death penalty would also make people more secure. In some countries of South America and the Far East, they have very severe penalties, including flogging, for even minor crimes. People in some areas of our nation feel they cannot walk around or step outside their houses for fear of criminals. In other countries, however, you would......

Words: 3517 - Pages: 15