...Trujillo Period 3 11/3/2015 Police should wear body cameras at all times while on duty. Police officers should be forced to wear body cameras while on their patrol duty. Equipping police with body cameras may be an effective way to advance the behavior of officers and the community with which they interact, a new study finds. Researchers at the Campus of South Florida released their report on a yearlong body-worn camera pilot program at the Orlando Police Department, in which they randomly selected 46 officers to wear the plans and compared them against 43 officers who did not. In the 12 months from March 2014 through February 2015, use-of-force events also known as "response to resistance" events fell 53 percent amongst officers with...
Words: 970 - Pages: 4
...the officers should be required to wear body cameras? Police dashboards cameras have been used in some law enforcement agencies for several year but the people and the government think it is time for the officers to wear body cameras to catch every move the officers make while on patrol. Police Officers should be required to use body cameras because it can help reduce the amount of force used on a suspect, it reduces the need to be dishonest, and helps improve the relationship with the people and the police force. To begin with, Police officers wearing body cameras can reduce the amount of force used on a suspect. Officer have been using too much force on the suspects that the civilians are disagreeing with the officer’s ways of handing thing. According to the article “The Right Body Camera Policy” states “This...
Words: 651 - Pages: 3
...Do you feel safe should cops wear body cameras? deathns linked to police brutallity has increased from 397 to 426 deaths anually before jumping to 461 in 2013. a way of preventing this is body cameras for police officers. There is a lot of debat wether [olice officers should wear body cams or not. the reasons i think the officers should be forced to wear these devices is police brutality,accountability for officers actions and the footage from the body cams can be used for evidence in police brutality cases.I personally think that poice officers should have to wear body camers for there saftey and citizens saftey and so people in general can feel more safe around police offficers. police brutallity is one reason that police officers should wear body cameras many cases of police brutality have been reported in the media is one of the most popular case the trayvon martin case where a young boy at the age of seventeen...
Words: 647 - Pages: 3
...Police brutality is becoming a big thing today. The latest topic of discussion is “Should body cameras be worn by police officers?”. Some say that they should have to wear them to ensure that they are doing their job right, it will decrease public abuse, and that people will be less frightened when they are approached by them. Police officers are supposed to set an example for others of their community and be accountable for ALL of their actions. but, that would asking for too much in this generation. Police officers have been questioned many times whether they have committed a crime or not and that is pathetic. We should never have to question their loyalty to protect and serve. These scandalous assumptions have made the world wonder should...
Words: 437 - Pages: 2
...With new "body cam" technology such as GoPro becoming more prominent in today's society, debate has arisen over whether police officers should be required to wear body cameras or not, so that every action they take while on duty can be recorded. Especially in light of current events many feel that police should be required to wear body cameras to prevent injustices. Like any problem there are pros and cons. And I believe that cons need to be addressed before moving on to the pros. Some of the cons against body cameras are that there is a huge cost for buy each camera as well as budget issues for each department. Another example is that with the limited vision it may not be precise enough to get entire circumstance in which case would lead to...
Words: 587 - Pages: 3
...Police Body Cameras Should police officers wear body cameras? The conflict in portland centers on how and when officers have access to video from body cameras. Videos of police shootings across the country have become critical. However police officers across the nation are beginning to push back on body cameras. Police officers should have to wear police body cameras. Some police stations are still debating on wether or not they should use police body cameras. State laws vary about what the public can see. Existing recordings are recovered under these laws, such as videos from cameras mount on patrol cars. “Body cameras produce more footage than dashboard cameras” (Kaleem). Footage that can show officers inside peoples homes. Body cameras have become an easy political answer to the problem of trust in police. Any policy that hides, shields, or opens up body-camera footage is probably wrong. Police body cameras created an issue on making a new contract between the city and the public union. Portlands labor agreement with...
Words: 490 - Pages: 2
...Are police body cameras worth the price? Police stations across the country are questioning whether they should make police officers in America wear body cameras, and if the problems with the body cameras are worth the price police stations must pay. I think police officers in America should not have to wear the cameras because they are expensive, and the cameras raise huge privacy concerns. One major problem with the body cameras is the cost, according to one article “Just to equip the top 100 largest police stations in the world would cost well over a billion dollars” (Anastasia 23). If it cost that much to just purchase cameras for 100 police stations it would cost an a lot more to purchase them for every police station in the country, And put more cities and states in debt. Also, another article says, “Departments must also pay for storing the video”(stateline.org 1) On top of paying for the cameras police stations must also pay for storing the videos which most police stations can not afford to do. Most police stations are unsure how to pay for the cameras because they are so expensive....
Words: 602 - Pages: 3
...Police Officers Wear Body Cameras: Pro or Con? Should police officers wear cameras while on duty to document their activities? The body camera is intended to provide an accurate, objective view of every event with a civilian. In an ideal situation, the camera would provide evidence of or discourage police misconduct while protecting officers against unfounded complaints of brutality or corruption. When unnamed black teenager Michael Brown was fatally shot by police, there was no body camera footage available. His death was followed by weeks of riots in the streets of Ferguson, Missouri and started the national debate about police conduct particularly when it involved Africa-Americans. While some witnesses to the events that evening support the officers account of self-defense, others argue that Michael...
Words: 1167 - Pages: 5
...Should police officers be required to wear body cameras? Police officers have had their ups and downs with public citizens in the past years, making many citizens feel a loss of trust. However, there are many things the law enforcement system can do to increase citizens' trust. Finding an effective way to do this while still focusing on their jobs can be challenging. Many individuals argue on whether body-worn cameras are a benefit in solving this concern. However, police officers should use body cameras because they have received substantial support from citizens and are helping police officers lower their reports of misconduct. Firstly, since law enforcement started using body-worn cameras, police misconduct complaints have been lowered....
Words: 544 - Pages: 3
...During the Speech Forum, there were two speakers who gave the reasons along with facts and explanations on the policy of why or why not law enforcement should wear body cameras. In the Pro's speech, she believe that law enforcement should wear the body camera because it would help in aiding in eyewitness testimony and because it eliminate police brutality while in the Con's speech he believe that law enforcement should not wear the body camera because they are counter productive and an invasion of privacy. Each gave their own reason behind their claims during the Speech Forum. In the Pro speaker's speech, her first claim of aiding in eyewitness testimony is a claim of fact, while her claim that it would stop police brutality was a claim...
Words: 596 - Pages: 3
...A Body-worn camera is a video recording system that is often used by law enforcement officers to record their communications with the public or gather video evidence at crime scenes. When body cameras were first introduced to the American public, police body-cameras seemed like they might help everyone. Police departments liked that body cameras reduced the number of public complaints about the officers’ behaviors. Communities and protestors liked that they would introduce some clearness and responsibility to an officer’s actions. Body cameras for every officer in the area is known to be very expensive, but when done to ensure everyone’s’ safety then it is worth it .Ever since officers began to wear body cameras; the amount of force has reduced...
Words: 1109 - Pages: 5
...Recently, a video was released to the public of a South Carolina police officer using excessive force on a black, female high-school student. Another officer putting his career on the line by using excessive force in an incident that is really minor---a student refusing to put their cellphone away! While reading a book on police brutality and its opposing views, it referenced statements by teenagers and adults who claimed to have despair when around the police. Due to crimes happening around them, people who have had police encounters state they feel police unfairly put them under the category of being associated to crime, even when that is not the case. Teens are arguing that when they encounter police officers, they are being treated unfairly...
Words: 1535 - Pages: 7
...Police Worn Body Cameras: A Step in the Right Direction Andrew Cordier ENG122: English Composition II Instructor Amy Morris August 18, 2016 There have been numerous advances in technology in recent years and some include law enforcement. Over the years, there have been huge strides in the technological advances in surveillance. Police Departments are one of these groups who have seen an increase in surveillance technology like dashboard mounted cameras, and now law enforcement agencies are looking to equip their officers with body cameras that can be worn on an officer’s lapel, glasses, and on their chest. The idea of equipping officers with these body cameras has been a hot topic of debate in light of recent past events, such as the unarmed shooting of Michael Brown by Officer Darren Wilson in Ferguson Missouri Mandatory use of body cameras should be put into place because it will protect civilians from the use of excessive force and hold officers responsible for their actions, not invade the privacy of both the public and police officers with the proper guidelines in place, and lower the rates of police use of excessive force, while lowering the rates of false claims against officers. With more and more cases of use of excessive force against civilians, people across America are becoming outraged by the actions of police officers and feel that taking the word of an officer is no longer good enough to explain their actions. Americans across the nation want answers...
Words: 1972 - Pages: 8
...ENG 112 30 November 2015 Body Cameras Providing Accountability Thesis Statement: Yes, body cameras should be worn by police officers because they provide accurate accounts of what happens at crime scenes, help civilians trust police officers, and give Americans an idea of what it is like to be behind the gun to more appreciate officers. I. Introduction II. Body cameras provide accurate account III. Body cameras help civilians trust officers IV. Body cameras gives an idea of what it is like behind the gun V. Refutation VI. Conclusion Body Cameras Providing Accountability The shooting of Trayvon Martin has elevated a necessity around the country for police officers to be equipped with body cameras. Yes, it is necessary for police officers to wear these cameras for accountability for oneself and a potential victim. Body cameras can rule out possible suspicions of wrongful deaths or mistreatments, such as racism. Police officers should want to protect themselves and their jobs with this device that records what is actually happening and being said at the crime scene. Yes, body cameras should be worn by police officers because they provide accurate accounts of what happens at crime scenes, helps civilians trust police officers, and gives Americans an idea of what it is like to be behind the gun to more appreciate officers. Body cameras provide an accurate account of what happens at crime scenes. The use of body cameras is a great way to get first...
Words: 1225 - Pages: 5
...iSPY Police brutality is on the rise, and many cases that can not really be answered because it is the citizen’s words against the officers’ word. “US law enforcement officers killed up to 1,199 people last year, the majority of whom were 'people of color,'” says The New York Times writers Marc Santora and Nikita Stewart in “Police Body Cameras Could Come to New York Soon” on December 3, 2014. According to Santora and Stewart, Mayor Bill de Blasio is speeding up a plan to outfit nearly all New York Police Department patrol officers with body cameras to ensure the public’s safety. Gonchar uses intelligent words, using direct quotes from Mayor Bill de Blasio, and usage of questions to help persuade whom it may concern. In the editorial by Santora...
Words: 654 - Pages: 3
