Free Essay

Should Student Athletes Get Paid

In: Business and Management

Submitted By biggs141
Words 1492
Pages 6
Derek Layton
Professor Bird
EN 300
11/18/14
Are College Athletes Going to be Paid? The NCAA is one of the top organizations in the world that brings in billions of dollars in revenue on college athletics alone most notably with college football and college basketball. Yes some of these athletes do get compensated with some sort of scholarship which does help out with their expenses but the chances of an athlete receiving an athletic scholarship that is worth anything meaningful is less than 2%. A full ride scholarship might as well be compared to as finding the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow. In cases that an athlete does receive a scholarship this does not come close to covering the expenses of tuition yet alone all of the other expense such has room and board, food and everything else a human being needs to survive.
Playing a colligate sport is just as demanding as a full time job and according to a survey done by “[1] The NCAA in 2011 playing football required 43.3 hours per week; college baseball, 42.1 hours; men's basketball, 39.2 hours; and women's basketball, 37.6 hours.” So these athletes have no time with school and their respective sport to find a job to help them with other expenses so they have to rely on student loans, grants or their parents to help them get through school. This also makes it much more difficult for a student athlete to pursue a more rigorous degree such as sciences and engineering. One problem that I have with the NCAA is all the restrictions that they put on recruiting and even after recruiting is over the athletes have to sign away their image, rights to their name, and their likeness just play in college. There was specific problem with a famous college athlete of Jonny Manziel or commonly referred to as “Jonny Football.” During Manziel’s final year of playing college football he was attending “[2] Walter Camp Football Foundation event, and at this event he was allegedly paid $7,500 for signing autographs and this went against NCAA Bylaw 12.5.2.1 -- accepting money for promoting or advertising the commercial sale of a product or service.” Which if he was found guilty he could have been ruled ineligible, Manziel was never found guilty of doing this but his school still suspended him for a part of a game because the NCAA put so much pressure on Texas A&M to do something about the situation.
A big issue with the NCAA is that it’s trying to suck every bit of money out of these athletes that they can. Manziel was selling his name which nothing is wrong with that because he has the god given right to sell his name if it is valuable enough to be bought. Since the NCAA is so money hungry they put all sorts of sanctions on these athletes to make it where the NCAA or the athletes respective school is the one entitled to that athletes name, jersey or whatever it may be, any other organization or business in this world it would be the opposite the athlete would be entitled to some sort of compensation made off of the player’s name or likeness. It is just hard to believe that the NCAA is trying to take the athletes name away from them when they have money making behemoths such as “March Madness” which “[3] exceeded one billion in T.V. and ad revenue alone in the year of 2012. That is more than the NFL postseason made $976 million, the NBA playoffs made $536 million, the MLB playoffs made $354 million and the NHL playoffs earned $101 million.” Yes a lot of this money does end up going back to the respective school or that schools conference, for each round a team advances the bigger the paycheck that school is going to get. This school also gets to choose how it spends this money which some does go back to the team whether it be to pay for a coaches salary, travel expenses, etc.
I can’t fathom how an organization that makes billions of dollars a year can get away with not paying or at least taking care of its most prized possession and that is the student athlete. Because without these kids the NCAA would not be able to swim around in their pile of cash that they are making off these kids, and I say kids because most them are not even to the age being able to go out and buy a beer. One of the arguments that the NCAA puts up against not having to pay the players is that they claim that most of the money if not all of it goes into helping the schools provided for other sports that are not self-sustaining, sports such as wrestling, swimming, and many other school related activities. Which most of these sports yes can’t sustain by themselves but there are a lot of boosters and fundraising events that go on to help with a huge chunk of that’s sports expenses. So that is why I find it hard to believe that all of the extra cash flow is eaten up by sports that are not able to support themselves. Now don’t get me wrong I still do believe that there is a strong value in education that these kids are able to receive, these kids should also feel blessed to be able to get the chance to play a colligate sport and at the same time get an education that is second to none. But I also do believe that there are way too many restrictions put on these athletes for example if a family friend goes out and buys this kid dinner or a pair of shoes that kid can be suspended by NCAA for taking in what the NCAA considers “unnecessary items.” That to me is just ridiculous how you can punish anyone for going out to dinner and someone else picking up the tab, there is a huge difference between that and a booster going out and buying an athlete a brand new car. One thing that I think that the boosters and the schools could do that would be a huge help to not only the athlete but as well as the athletes family is to send the family up to watch their son or daughter play a game or two. With athletes traveling all across the country now to play for a certain school it has become very difficult for their families not only financially but also physically to see their son or daughter play. A huge first step was taken on the NCAA to provide more for its student athletes, when just after UCONN won the 2013 men’s basketball championship their star point guard Shabazz Napier who is now a point guard for the Miami heat said that he “sometimes went to bed starving because he could not afford food” Shortly after this the NCAA council approved a new meal plan [4] that went from having a 3 meals a day or a food stipend, to being able to have an unlimited meal and snack plan in conjunction with their athletics participation.
Another huge step was when the football players at [5] Northwestern University filed to become a union, shortly after they filed for the right to unionize the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) had granted them this right and recognizing the school’s football players as Employees. The NLRB review provides the opportunity to expand the impact of the case beyond Northwestern, to all private schools that play Division I football. When Northwestern did this it was an historic event and this was the first major step to let players have a voice for themselves. But as of now it has not done anything but scare the NCAA into giving the players a little more leeway and more of a voice when it comes to college athletics.
I truly do believe that eventually the student athletes and the NCAA will eventually find a happy medium between all of this. You can also start to tell that the NCAA is realizing that it does need to lighten up on some of their ridiculous restrictions they have against these athletes. If they do not do this they see that the student athletes will eventually get tired of it and form a union as the case with Northwestern. One thing that I hope does not happen is that the NCAA eventually gives in and starts paying the athletes like they are professionals. Because what these student athletes have to realize is that they are students first and athletes second, and they must realize that. Like I said before the education they are receiving is truly second to none and you can’t put a price on that.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Should Student-Athletes Get Paid?

...Thomas Bessinger Professor Hortman February 18, 2014 Should Student-Athletes get paid? A very popular question that has been lingering around the sports world for sometime now is whether or not student-athletes should get paid. There are a lot of different opinions about this topic. The NCAA does not allow student-athletes to receive any type of benefits of any kind from the university; if the student-athlete does, he is no longer an amateur athlete and can no longer compete at the college level. This problem has been common over the past years and is causing athletes and universities to be penalized. If the NCAA would allow student-athletes to receive some benefits this would not be as common. Therefore, student-athletes should get paid because they are making money for their university, many student-athletes cannot have a job, and it is unfair for the NCAA to profit off of student-athletes. This reasoning has led many people to try and incorporate change in the collegiate world. Student-athletes, particularly at “big time” schools, have been bringing in millions of dollars in for their universities. The universities are selling jerseys that have the athletes’ names on the back, but the student-athletes are not receiving anything from that (Chen, 2013). Student-athletes are not even allowed to sell their jerseys or other apparel that is given to them by the university. In 2010 the NCAA did an investigation and found out that AJ Green sold one of his jerseys for $1000...

Words: 1188 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Student Athletes Should Get Paid Essay

...Should Student-Athletes Get Paid To pay or not to pay is what many experts are asking, this talking about paying college student-athletes. Many people argue that they should get paid because of their athletic gift but what these people do not understand is that they are students before they are athletes hence the term student-athlete. “College is a place for learning not earning” says Ava Cambio who argues against the idea of additional pay for student-athletes. “Students are not professional athletes who are paid salaries and incentives in sports. They are students receiving access to a college education through their participation in sports.”states Horace Mitchell in his article , Should College Student-Athletes be paid?, which is against the idea of pay for...

Words: 654 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Should Student Athletes Get Paid Analysis

...The NCAA states "understudy competitors might be beginners… and ought to be shielded from misuse by expert and business undertakings" (Should Student-Athletes Get Paid?). Nonetheless, with this announcement it appears that schools and colleges "are the element that adventures" them (Should Student-Athletes Get Paid?). In 2000, because of the expanding expense of instruction, the NCAA "endorsed understudy competitors' work in employments paying up to $2,000 amid a school year; the salary can address instructive costs" (Should Students Athletes Paid?). Be that as it may, not exclusively does $2,000 grain take care of instructive expenses, particularly if not on grant, but rather the NCAA is not enabling understudy competitors to advance themselves. Likewise, with all the time rehearsing and working in the classroom, what number of competitors have room schedule-wise to really land a position? As a general rule, they are as of now working by performing on the court, field, or arena. In a narrative led by ESPN entitled "Fab Five," one of the school ball players for the University of...

Words: 1495 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Athletes Get Paid

...whether student athletes can be considered amateurs any longer, and whether they should instead be paid for their efforts. This debate over whether or not NCAA athletes should be paid boils down to a disagreement over whether their scholarship is compensation or whether they deserve more incentives. One side argues that athletes do get paid by going to school for free with scholarships covering all expenses so that they do not need additional money, while the other side argues that if the school is going to make money off of the athlete’s names, then they should get a portion of the money. NCAA football coaches made $53.4 million; meanwhile, the 13,877 Division...

Words: 915 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Economics

...whether or not college athletes should be paid for playing on a team. The argument has initially consisted of whether or not college athletes deserve special treatment over the other students at universities. Some people believe that giving student athlete’s money would help encourage the athletes to play harder while others believe they are already being paid with free tuition and should not be given money. I believe student athletes should have their full tuition, meals, room and board paid for; but I do not think the universities should necessarily be responsible for paying the athletes especially since so many are not responsible with their money. The nature of a school at the university level is to make money through education. No one is making the athletes go to college to make money for the colleges and universities. It is an agreement that is not set up to pay them in ways that is fair in relation to the money the universities make from their participation. Student athletes are like unpaid interns in college who work to gain experience for their possible future profession. Many athletes today walk around campus with rock star status anyway. If they were to get paid it would further that perception that they were something bigger than just a student athlete. Also, is student athletes were to get paid; many of the athletes would simply waste the money they get on their wants, and not save it for their necessities. Even if the student athletes have issues with money...

Words: 731 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Essay On Should College Athletes Get Paid

...Should College Athletes Get Paid Ever wonder if college athletes should be paid? A debate that comes up every year is that if college athletes should be paid or should not be paid. College athletes should not be paid for these three reasons: college tuition should be enough money, the NCAA is a non-profit organization, and the college athletic departments will not be able to afford to pay the players. z College athletes get a scholarship and free tuition which costs enough so they do not need to get paid. College tuition is a lot of money and most out-of-state public schools cost around $23,000. If the athlete would go to a private out-of-state school it normally cost around $32,000. That is a ton of money to have just handed to you so you can play sports. “Essentially they receive a...

Words: 594 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

College Athletes Get Paid

...they attract students to their institutions. Universities depend on their athletes to produce and maintain the popularity of their school's name. According to NCAA rules, “You are not eligible for participation in a sport if you have ever: Taken pay, or the promise of pay, for competing in that sport” (NCAA Regulations 1).Even though the athletes are the one making the money for the college the students are not paid for their time spent playing sports. The NCAA has the capabilities to pay the students but it has not happen yet. The college athletes have no incentive to stay in college and finish their degrees, as many cannot afford to pay for the increasingly expensive college...

Words: 912 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Argumentive Essay

...(Cassavaugh). Athletes can lose scholarship money because of an injury, poor play or misconduct. There has been controversy that student athletes should be paid. How does one determine who should be paid, how much and where does this money come from? Athletes are amateurs who should concentrate on their education. How does one determine if an athlete is an amateur or a professional? An amateur is one who cannot receive money in the form of salaries or endorsements. They play a sport for the love and desire of it. A professional on the other hand gets paid a salary or money for endorsements. Professionals are also more skilled and concentrate one hundred percent on their sport. Amateurs do not have the time to only commit to a sport since they have to attend classes or work to support themselves. If student Athletes did get paid, college sports would lose their competitive hype. Let’s look at football on a college level compared to the pros. Athletes playing on a college level (amateur) give every play their all trying to do whatever it takes to win with hopes of someday be picked to go pro. Pro football players on the other hand, do not give every play one hundred percent. They are afraid of being hurt and know regardless of the game’s outcome they will still get paid. What if the athlete does not make it to the professional level? These student athletes need to make sure they have an education they can fall back on. These student athletes are students first before the athlete. In...

Words: 1155 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Essay On College Athletes Should Not Be Paid

...have helped many athletes live, however, if caught the players could be severely punished. They put their bodies and health at risk for the university, by becoming a college athlete they take away their freedoms also they eliminate their chances of living a normal college life. Ever since the fab four were caught taking money for various items many other scandals have been stopped. Many top D1 college athletes are being paid or selling their items for money. These actions go against the NCAA rules and stipulations for the players. College athletes are adored...

Words: 1684 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

College Athletes Should Be Paid

...Whether college athletes should be paid or not is a very controversial topic in the sports world. Many professional football or basketball players in the NCAA and the NBA get paid millions of dollars each year (Text 1, lines 10-16). However, college athletes don’t deserve to be paid as if they were in the NCAA or the NBA. People in the sports community hasn't taken into consideration all the benefits that student-athletes receive with an athletic scholarship. Due to universities providing scholarships and paid tuition, athletes shouldn’t be paid to play a sport. The athletic scholarship, paid tuition, and extra benefits that the student-athletes receive is pay enough. For instance, text 4 implies that an athletic scholarship can be worth approximately twenty to fifty thousand per year, and this doesn’t include the protective gear or travel expenses that students don’t have to worry about (lines 5-6). People need to...

Words: 760 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Analysis: Should College Athletes Be Paid

...Should College Athletes Be Paid a Salary? Being a college athlete is not only stressful but it is also a tiring job to maintain. Being an athlete comes with a huge amount of responsibilities, and with having responsibilities they tend to get in the way of having time to do anything else. On top of that it is harder for college athletes to maintain a job outside of school . Since most college athletes are busy maintaining their studies such as what they are majoring in and their sports, it makes it harder for them to fulfill their goals when they are student athletes. The only student athletes that have that support are students who come from a wealthy family which provide them with money to spend, however most athletes are not that fortunate, which is why colleges should pay their student athletes. College athletes should be paid not only because they are filled with dedication and determination towards school...

Words: 1681 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Should College Athletes Get Paid Essay

...Should College Athletes Get Paid? College athletes should be paid for playing at the college level. This topic is interesting to me because it has been a debatable topic for a long time. College athletes deserve to get a pay check because they are still responsible to keep their grades up while playing and training for football. They work harder than the pros because they have more of a motivation to get to the higher profession than someone who is already there. They can use that money to help support their families. The coaches are getting paid but they don’t play a sport or endure in a sport. The NCAA is making a profit out of them. In all honesty, the college athletes are one of the most hardest working athletes that don’t get paid. College...

Words: 1059 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Essay Why College Athletes Should Not Get Paid

...What is your opinion on why college athletes being paid, because I have my own. I feel if we did pay them they would kill the joy and the excitement of playing college sports. I think it would absolutly destroy college sports. Paying the college athlete’s would take the fun out of bowl games (football) and March Madness (basketball). They should not get paid because they get a free education, they are not professionals, and they would not take their education as serious. My first opinion is that they should not get paid because they get a free education. I think this is the main reason on why they should not be paid. The College athletes are provided with the opportunity to earn a degree, engage in college life, and play their favorite sport...

Words: 800 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Essay on College Athletes

...vast struggles of being a student. If a student is gifted with intelligence or stifling speed and athleticism they have a chance to earn a scholarship that virtually pays for their entire college experience. In recent history it is apparent that for some student-athletes this money is not enough, bringing up a burning question in college sports: should college athletes be paid? Some believe that it is essential for them to be paid for their hard work and dedication. Others believe that they are already relieved of future college debt, so why give them more? Each spectrum of this argument provides clear and concise evidence making it difficult to decipher which route may be the most reasonable. College is an expensive endeavor and student-athletes already gain a financial advantage and significantly larger benefits over the majority of the student population. The NCAA has always been considered an amateur league. According to the Oxford English Dictionary, an amateur is defined as, “one who cultivates anything as a pastime, as distinguished from one who prosecutes it professionally; hence, sometimes used disparagingly, as = dabbler, or superficial student or worker.” In 1957 the NCAA came to the conclusion, after years of avoiding the pressure, to subsidize and grant athletic scholarships. As young sports fans we aspire to be like our favorite athletes, but in reality only a small fraction of these students become professional level athletes after   their college...

Words: 2066 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Should Student Athletes Be Paid

...Should Student Athletes Be Paid? Student Athletes spend countless hours perfecting their craft. In the article “Should Athletes Be Paid,” both Joe Nocera and Bob Williams have very different opinions. Even though athletes work very hard, student athletes should not be paid because they could draw themselves away from school, and they receive scholarships to pay for their education. Student Athletes spend hours of time and effort to become good at what they do. Countless hours, days, even weeks build up to make them as good as they are. The better the athlete the more money they bring into the school. It is known in many male sports that, “Men’s basketball and football are their to bring for the school,” (Nocera 22). The better the athlete is, the more support, money, and curiosity it will...

Words: 505 - Pages: 3