Siemens Bribery Scandal

In: Business and Management

Submitted By popcorn123
Words 1653
Pages 7
International Management – Siemens Case Study Group Coursework Presentation
Question 2
Introduction
Klaus Kleinfeld took over as CEO of Siemens in 2005 from Heinrich von Pierer and was at the helm of the company until his resignation on the 25th April 2007. During his time he was seen as an enigmatic premier who transformed the company. The stock had grown by 39% since he took over (Global Business 07/05/2007). He streamlined the organisation by cutting costs, boosting innovation and expanding abroad. He even maintained a rise in the company’s share price during the bribery scandals publicity.
Was the board right to accept his resignation?
This was a highly sensitive decision at the time because the bribery scandals came to light whilst Kleinfeld was CEO but he had worked magic at Siemens in a very short amount of time, in only two years he had transformed Siemens and their share price had grown exponentially as a result.
Based upon his track record at the company he did not deserve to be released in that manner. The bribery came to light during Klienfeld’s tenure but most of payments were made during von Pierer’s time as CEO. Kleinfeld pushed Siemens employees to make faster decisions and put as much emphasis on the customers as on the technology. He sold off the unprofitable mobile phone production to BenQ and fostered a JV between Nokia and Siemens to merge their mobile and fixed line phone equipment businesses to create one of the world’s biggest network firms. In addition he invested $6 billion in 2006 on acquiring positions in growing areas such as medical diagnostics and wind power. Overall he left the company in a very strong position, indeed only hours before he tendered his resignation the company announced that its operating profit in the most recent quarter had soared by 49% to $2.7 billion. It is also apparent that Kleinfeld was forced out to…...

Similar Documents

The Bribery Scandal at Siemens Ag Analysis

...The Bribery Scandal at Siemens AG Analysis Lvao Guo Arkansas State University The Bribery Scandal at Siemens AG Analysis This case discusses the bribery scandals that happened in Siemens AG in 2006 and 2007. There are a series of scandals involve that some of the company's employees establish slush funds to obtain contracts. In another case, they were accused by IG Metall of bribing a union. It bribes the labor representatives of supervisory board to enlist their support of policy. Since then, the company managers' bribery at the Italian energy company employees was convicted by German officials. After the raid on Siemens offices in Germany, they continued to investigate the possible misconduct on Siemens in several other countries like the US, Greece, Italy and Switzerland. Due to the aftermath of the scandal, the company's Chief Executive Officer Klaus Kleinfeld and Supervisory Board Chairman Heinrich von Peeler had to resign, even if they did not directly implicate. With the Siemens bribery scandal surfaced, Volkswagen AG, Duetusche Telecom AG, Duetsche Bahn AG, and Deutche Post AG unethical business practices exposed at the same time in Germany. Those corruption scandals make a query for the German Co-determination law and Mitbestimmug—wondering if they were flawed. From the viewpoint of a Siemens employee who is willing to break the law in order to gain large profits, it was definitely worth it. However, in my opinion, enterprises have to face the legal...

Words: 457 - Pages: 2

Bribery

...In this paper one will explaining what bribery is, the laws on bribery, who can be involved in bribery and what are the punishment for committing bribery.   Bribery can take place anywhere. It can also affect many people. It can take place in the court rooms of the United States to the sports that one watches every day. There are many laws against bribery to help stop this from happing, and if committed it is have very serious punishments depending on how the bribery took place. Bribery makes it difficult for decisions to be made honestly and fairly. One thing could be said for sure bribery is very much against the law. Bribery as described by the law is when someone improperly gives, accepts, offers or receives something of value for the purpose of influencing the action, views, decisions or public duties of an official, juror, or someone in a position of trust. Bribery is considered a criminal act and it is categorized as a white collar crime. Bribery can be offered or accepted with something promised, money, property, goods, or anything that has value to the other person. Bribery can also be and is associated with extortion. On the other hand one cannot confuse a gift as a bribe. A gift is not a bribe because when a gift is giving there are no intentions or talk about influencing the person the gift is being given to. There are many different types of bribery such as in sporting events where one can bribe a player or a decision making official such as...

Words: 784 - Pages: 4

Bribery Scandal

...According to the Webster Dictionary Bribing is money or favor given or promised in order to influence the judgment or conduct of a person in a position of trust. In nowadays people use bribe in their daily lives for a lot of things that they don't realize, for example you finish my homework and I'll take you to lunch; that is just a small way of bribing. In a lot of countries, for you to be able to get something done faster you need to throw some extra money in or some type of a gift. Then we ask is that illegal or just a cost of doing business? I believe that bribing is unethical, not only on the person doing the bribe but also for the person receiving the bribe. There is a famous saying that says "it takes two to tango". In the Siemens case, the bribery was in all of their doings. I believe that it wasn't necessary to use bribe to win over the contracts. What companies need to do to win over contracts is to actually sell their products, believing that it's going to benefit the country and show the countries how. Maybe instead for giving millions of dollars in bribe money actually give them a big discount. 2. The board had their reasons to not extend Kleinfeld's term, despite his good performance and was not being directly implicated in the bribery scandal. From the beginning he was not received well by the conservative old generation because of his American style of work. So I believe that the board was not right in not extending Kleinfeld's term, because......

Words: 354 - Pages: 2

Bribery

...Bribery is a common ethical problem in business and normal life and as the author stated in the Toronto Star article, “it is every CEO’s worst nightmare” to find his company name under a bribery scandal headline. However, this ethical problem might not be considered a problem in other countries in the world. The question that has been raised and discussed in the class, given this fact, is what should an international company do in situations in which it either bribes or loses in foreign countries? Should it accept the fact that bribery as part of the business in this country or should it maintain the same ethical standards it used to hold in its country of origin Clearly the active agent in this case is the international company. The passive agents are competitors, society and investors. There are only two choices, in my opinion, for the company; either to bribe or not to bribe. Although we discussed another choice in our class in which a company use a local agent to do all the dirty tasks, but I believe it is exactly the same as paying the bribe by itself. If we apply the utilitarianism model to analyze this situation focusing on the purpose of maximizing company’s profits, some people might not consider the company's bribes unethical activities. As long as the company’s market share is increasing and investors are gaining more money, nobody cares what the company has done to accomplish these goals. In my opinion, under the same method of analysis and only considering...

Words: 1693 - Pages: 7

Courtroom Bribery

...Introduction - The study of bribery and corruption in the courtroom is paramount to protecting the rights of every person seeking justice. The fact that a judge or District Attorney is 99% honest simply will not suffice. Even the 1% must be treated fairly and equally under the laws of our country. Just like Jesus would leave the ninety-nine to go after the one, we must protect everyone equally under the laws established. Meditate on the words of Edmund Burke “The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” The study and revelation of courtroom corruption is significant because I have personally observed bribery in the hallways of courtrooms in North Carolina. A wise man once told me that the courtroom is not black or white, but green because the person with the most money is routinely dispensed the best outcome. Another personal reason that this topic is personally significant is because I now reside in the state of Mississippi where the 2004 Corporate Crime Reporter asserted that our state was the most crooked state in America. (Mokhibar, 2004) I. The problem is that too many times the issues in the courtroom are not really about the truth. A. Case study on the Duke Lacrosse case involving Durham County District Attorney, Mike Nifong. (Yaeger, 2007) B. Factors involved in the Duke Lacrosse case, and the lives that were destroyed as a result of courtroom corruption. 1...

Words: 622 - Pages: 3

Siemens Bribery Scandal

.... In addition he invested $6 billion in 2006 on acquiring positions in growing areas such as medical diagnostics and wind power. Overall he left the company in a very strong position, indeed only hours before he tendered his resignation the company announced that its operating profit in the most recent quarter had soared by 49% to $2.7 billion. It is also apparent that Kleinfeld was forced out to an extent by other executive members who disliked his management style and used the publicity of the scandal to orchestrate his departure when Kleinfeld was never actually charged with any wrongdoing. On the other hand although Kleinfeld was not directly implicated, he and von Pierer were criticised for failing to trace the embezzlement of large company funds and large payments being made over several years which shows how weak the internal controls over the financial reporting were. By jettisoning Kleinfeld it gave a huge signal to stakeholders both internal and external that Siemens were putting their soiled bribery past behind them and starting a new from the very top. The corruption scandal represented a failure of leadership and therefore it was the right time for a change whether it was Kleinfeld’s fault or not. Kleinfeld’s management and leadership style were aggressive and his vision for the company was modern, in attempting to achieve this he was brought into conflict with more conservative defenders of the Siemens’ existing business culture. Worldwide he was seen as a...

Words: 1653 - Pages: 7

Siemens Bribery Scandal Case Study

...Case Study: Siemens Bribery Scandal 1. Corruption was deeply embedded in Siemen’s business culture. They rationalized this corruption by stating that it was not illegal to initiate bribes to government officials. This was true, however not anymore, the law changed in 1999 prohibiting such acts of corruption. 2. If a manager at Siemens would have stood up and took a stand against corruption, I think that he/she would have most likely been fired for being insubordinate. The higher executives that were promoting such bribery would have wanted these managers to go along with what they were doing. The manager could have also been demoted possibly, or just plain and simple reamed out by the higher executives. 3. Siemens spent extra money to secure future business investments. This in, in turn, means that other companies, even ones that might have an advantage, lose business opportunities. The entire concept of such corruption completely disregards competition, because it simply removes it, unless other companies also engage in bribery. 4. Some economists argue that doing such practices such as bribery is the price that must be paid to perform a greater good. They support this claim by stating that it can promote efficiency and growth in countries that have pervasive and cumbersome regulations, and may also enhance welfare in countries that have preexisting political structures that distort the workings of the market mechanism. On the other hand other...

Words: 426 - Pages: 2

Bribery Scandal Siemans

...Bribery Scandal Case Summary This case covers the scandal at Siemens AG in 2006, 2007 which consisted of employees bribing foreign officials. Siemens employees made slush funds specifically for the purpose of gaining an unfair advantage to win contracts. They also were accused of bribing officials of the labor board in return they would give support for Siemen’s policies. Siemens office in Germany was raided and an official investigation was started. In other countries they were investigated subsequently following the raid in Germany. The CEO resigned regardless of not being found responsible though the scandal was under his watch. This scandal set off a chain reaction to questioning the other companies in competition and the laws in Germany made to deter this behavior. Labor representatives who had been possibly bribed held the board, which governed the laws. This created an element of people responsible of making sure this type of thing did not happen, by letting it happen for personal gain. All along critics of this type of management feared this to be a potential issue. This shed light upon the challenges that the new management would encounter after the scandal occurred. In your opinion, is “bribing” unethical & illegal or just a cost of doing business? Discuss this in light of Siemens’ bribery scandal. Bribing is unethical and it takes the level playing arena away from business and all that compete within it. Oligopolies and monopolies arise from this...

Words: 418 - Pages: 2

Bribery

...7. In your opinion, are bribes ever acceptable? Why or why not? Provide examples and how you would handle No, in my opinion, if we encourage or we get accustomed with bribery, it can lead to a corrupt society and can do more harm in the community. For example, if a community or society get used to bribery, it can lead to a higher corruption rate. Having a higher corruption rate in a country can have a negative impact in economic growth. In addition, bribery can have a bad impact in the community, and for example, if a person is trying to bribe someone to approve their proposal (can be a product or project) without undergoing to its due process, this can lead to low quality products and worst it can lead to poor outcomes. 8. What are ethical dilemmas? Why do they exist? Provide some examples. Ethical dilemma is a situation that any side you choose can argue about what is right and what is wrong. Examples: A new sales employee was asked by his supervisor to disregard the company's return policy and give the product to the customer and asked not to report the incident. Your Professor asked you perform a peer evaluation of your group members to determine the grade. One of your group member is your friend, who did not participate in group discussions, meetings and did not contribute in your class project at all. Giving him a passing grade will let him pass the class, and he will fail the class when he gets a low peer evaluation score. 9. Discuss the cultural......

Words: 299 - Pages: 2

Scandal

...Lehman Brothers Scandal Corporate governance is defined as a system that control and direct a corporation (Shleifer 1997). Governance arrangement specifies dissemination of responsibilities and rights among different contributors in the corporation like financial managers, board of directors and shareholders. It also specifies procedures and rules of decision making in corporate affairs. Besides, corporate governance has plays its role to encourage organization to produce value through innovation as well as development process. Lehman Brothers would be further analyze and discussed in term of accounting scandal below. Lehman Brothers was the fourth largest United States investment bank when it collapsed and this has affected 25,000 employees worldwide. Thus, the significant factors that cause this scandal of corporate failure to be happened would be analysed below. Firstly, Lehman has high degree of excessive debt and leverage which mean ratio of total assets to shareholders’ equity in 2007. Furthermore, it has a huge mortgage securities portfolio that cause this corporate to becoming expose to declining market conditions (Chiquier 2004). Besides, it has the largest debt of $619m, which is the largest bankruptcy filling in history which surpasses Enron. Lehman’s shares decreases a huge amount of 48% concerning it would be the next firm to fail in its corporate governance as it is the second largest underwriter of mortgage-backed securities. Consequently, the declining...

Words: 572 - Pages: 3

Scandal

... contracts that called on Enron to meet obligations months or years later. So when the customers lost the faith in Enron, it was like a run-on bank scenario. If Enron’s customers were willing to continue and use the company’s service, Enron would have been able to avoid bankruptcy. Enron might have had large debts and obligation but they had also large revenue, once Enron lost their credibility they also lost their customers, as they were not willing to continue to use their services. Andersen was a large and established firm, and losing a company like Enron, as their client would not had led to their end, but the company lost their credibility in the eyes of their clients. As a result of that, many clients decided to terminate their contracts Andersen. Following the scandal with Enron, Andersen lost a huge amount of customers, which led the to declare bankruptcy. There are different reasons why so many companies fired Andersen. A strong opinion is that once the scale of the scandal was known, the clients felt betrayed; it is sort of un-American to do such thing. Clients did not want to be involved with a company that causes so many people to loss their job, and causes much harm to many more. Lack of integrity was linked to both Enron and Andersen. Once a perceived lack of integrity is attached to a person, it is really hard to recover from that; it causes irreparable damage. If a lack of integrity is linked to a person, all of his actions will be looked over with...

Words: 2037 - Pages: 9

Bribery Scandal

...For this assignment our learning team discussed the Bribery Scandal at Siemens AG. As a group we analyzed the case and conducted additional research to answer critical questions in each key section. Supported by the course material and supplemental articles, the team compiled the research that discussed Internet technologies, affective technologies in management development strategies, global alliances and provided recommendations on cross border operations. Key issues Analysis of the Siemens case resulted in several key issues which explained the bribery scandal. Lack of leadership is the primary cause for the Siemens representatives convicted of bribery in 2007. The intention of the bribery was to ensure that Siemens obtained needed global contracts. The methodology offered supported no personal gain from this bribery and the organization gained contracts which negated a cause for an illegal act. In addition, Siemens was operated in countries where these acts were considered legal. There were no other documented strategies to obtain the contracts that did not include illegal activity (Deresky, 2011). Although managers were able to offer defenses against the allegations, the underlying issue in this case is poor leadership will result in multiple scandals. The leadership team within this organization took no responsibility from an international perspective to create an ethical environment and standards for their employees. There was no acknowledgement of illegal...

Words: 923 - Pages: 4

The Olympics and Bribery

... would be futile. There were clear and concise rules stating that any money used in the lobbying of the IOC by the SLOC was not to exceed a limit of $150, which they clearly went above and over. One small detail which could be used in their defense would involve the statement made in the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act regarding payments being made that assist the payer to obtain ministerial actions, and the fact that these types are not prohibited. The legal definition of the word "ministerial" is "being or having the characteristics of an act or duty prescribed by law as part of the duties of an administrative office". The SLOC could claim that while the cap amount regarding the contributions was exceeded, the actions which were taken were done so under the legal duties of the administrative office within their committee. An appropriate method of punishment in regard to the actions taken by the SLOC should be closely focused upon the administrators, who are the ultimate initiators of the activity which took place. The orchestrators of the gifting of such items ranging from scholarships to medical care, are the ones who should face the judgment in this situation because the SLOC as a whole, cannot be punished for the actions of a few influential members. These individuals should be removed from their position of authority. Punishing an entire community, especially one like the Salt Lake City area which is rich with the morals and values of the Mormon faith, would solve......

Words: 600 - Pages: 3

Scandal

...AIG, American International Group Inc., is one of the top multinational insurance corporations. AIG, with asset of 556 billion, provides insurance service for more than 150 different countries and it has over 630, 000 employees over the world. Even though AIG is such a giant corporation, it has encountered financial problems in the early 2000s. Under financial pressure and a lack of internal control, AIG have committed frauds resulting in several scandals. One of the accounting scandals was disclosed during 2005 which involved a material mis-statement due to false transactions during 2000. This scandal set to prelude leading the downfall of AIG in 2008. In this paper, I will analyze the cause, the transactions and finally effects of the scandal. The Accounting Scandal The Players The CEO of AIG was Maurice “Hank” Greenberg. Greenberg joined AIG in 1962 and led AIG for thirty eight years until his retirement in March 2005. Greenberg was not only the CEO, but also the chairman of the board of AIG. AIG also have several subsidiaries, which include National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh (NUFIC) and Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection (HSB). Their financial information are consolidated in AIG’s financial statements. The scandal also involves another corporation General Re Corporation. General Re is a subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., an investment group run by the billionaire Warren Buffet. General Re also has subsidiaries all over the world and......

Words: 281 - Pages: 2

Bribery

..., Alberto Fujimori. Video–taped evidence showed that Vladimir Montesano’s, Fujimori’s spy chief, had repeatedly bribed congressmen to defect to Fujimori’s party to ensure its majority in congress. In addition, large bribes had enabled Montesano’s to control most of the media and influence the judiciary. However, Fujimori is credited with having reduced petty corruption. His administration pursued policies reducing the role of government, which he justified not only on efficiency grounds, but on the grounds that reducing the role of government would reduce opportunities for corruption. He attempted to reduce corruption in the police and municipal governments, in the latter case by establishing a supervisory agency to field citizen complaints. However, his reforms of the judiciary are thought to have made it more corrupt. Despite some progress, however, several institutions with which ordinary people have much contact were judged to be corrupt by Transparency International in a November 2001 report. ast week did not begin well for Siemens CEO Klaus Kleinfeld, 49, and supervisory board chairman Heinrich von Pierer, 66. The chief executive and his supervisor seemed to be stumbling from one major setback to the next -- and neither had much hope of being let off the hook. As early as last Monday, word began spreading that Pierer was looking to replace Kleinfeld should he become ensnared in the corruption scandal currently engulfing one of Germany's largest and most prestigious......

Words: 2201 - Pages: 9