Free Essay

Simpson Race Case

In: Business and Management

Submitted By perron67
Words 865
Pages 4
Sampson Racing Case
Organizational Leadership – Fall 2011
John Perron

I really tried to think about the Framing of this scenario as I also went through the numbers. One unique perspective that I had is that as a young man I used to race motorcycles. While I understand the basic costs and the elements of racing that are presented here, I was surprised that there was never any concern for the driver’s safety in this scenario. It should be the number one concern when making a decision to race or not race. It was not even an element presented in the framing of this decision-making exercise.

That being said, I included that in my analysis. I took the approach of listing the facts that the scenario presented and tried to look at the cost of racing versus not racing in the same way as I would look at any scenario where lives are also at stake as in going to the moon, or having brain surgery. Certainly at racings speeds, lives are at stake.
How much is a driver’s life worth? There are no guarantees in this scenario for $1,000,000+….it only says Goodstone is considering it. Is a driver’s life worth more or less than $1,000,000?

The current financial state of the team is $32,500 in the hole.
There are 4 possible outcomes in this scenario:

1) Sampson Team decides to race and finishes in the Top 5 50% Chance. Result: There were no definite numbers, but let’s guess and say that the new annual sponsorship is worth $1,000,000+.

2) Sampson Team decides to race and blows an engine 29.17% chance. Result: Loss of the $500,000 Oil Sponsorship plus $20,000 for the cost of an engine, for a total loss of $520,000, thereby moving the team to $552,500 in the hole. Also to be considered is that any time an engine blows in a race the driver is in danger. Losing a driver is the ultimate cost

3) Sampson Team decides not to race and moves from $32,500 in the hole to $50,000 in the hole, but keeps the $500,000 oil sponsorship and maintains the safety of the driver until a time when the mechanical crew can gain a better understanding of the nature of the intermittent engine problems and solve those.

4) Sampson Team decides to race and finishes out of the Top 5, or does not finish for a reason other than a blown engine. 20.83% chance.
Result: Sampson team does not have to give back $25,000 of the $40,000 sponsorship money for this race and maintains the $500,000 Oil Sponsorship. However, there is an 8.33% chance of some sort of mechanical failure, which puts the driver in danger. Again, how much is a driver’s life worth?

So the question is “Should Sampson Team Race or not Race?”

My conclusion is Sampson Team should NOT RACE. Here are the reasons why:

1) Based upon the framed scenario, Sampson Team really has no conclusive understanding as to why the periodic engine failures occur. Everybody is guessing, and their judgement may be clouded by the team’s sponsorship opportunities. This is a really bad scenario waiting to happen in auto racing. A driver’s life is a risk, not just the car or the sponsorships. 2) Historically we have a 29.17% chance of engine failure and an 8.33% chance of other failures. These failures put the driver at serious risk. When added together that’s 37.5% chance of some sort of failure happening, putting the driver in danger. That number needs to be much smaller, regardless of the good finishes they have had historically. So while history says Sampson team might have a 50% chance of winning a sponsorship worth MAYBE $1,000,000+, we also have a 37.5% chance that something really bad could happen in terms of the driver’s safety. 3) Data shows the team had significant number of failures at low temperatures.. And regardless of the trend of the data and the fact that some failure happened at higher temperatures, we have no racing data for the engine operating at 40 degrees. This may increase the chances of engine failures., we have no way to know, and that is not good in terms of driver safety. 4) In all, there are too many unknowns putting the driver at risk. Being $50,000 in the hole is a way better scenario than losing the life of a driver. Consider Indy 500 Champion Dan Whelden’s case recently in Las Vegas. Many of the drivers knew the teams were pushing it to drive on that track at those speeds. It was all about the thrill of racing until a driver was killed. Racing is a business, but money is not the only thing at risk in the racing business. 5) By not racing the team goes $50,000 in the hole but retains the critical $500,000 Oil Sponsorship perhaps helping them buy some time to get their engine woes figured out.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The OJ Simpson Trial

...Brought On By The OJ Simpson Trials The OJ Simpson trials were held from January 24 to October 3, 1995. These trials were held at the Los Angeles County Superior Court in California. The trials of the People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson were held to try former NFL star and actor O. J. Simpson. He was tried on two counts of murder for the June 12, 1994 deaths of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson and a friend of hers, Ron Goldman. The case was later described as the most publicized criminal trial in American history. The trial and its outcomes were such a major piece of history from the late 90s, with its impact is still being discussed today as there have been numerous accounts of retelling the events....

Words: 1046 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Oj Trial

...Criminal Law in Action (2148) Project 1 O.J Simpson Case Analysis September 7, 2014 "No one enters suit justly, no one goes to court honestly; they rely on empty pleas, they speak lies, they conceive mischief and bring forth iniquity."— Isaiah 59: 4,9-11, 14-15. The O.J Simpson trial was one of the most publicized criminal trials in American history. America’s beloved professional football star O. J. Simpson, was tried on two counts of murder when his then ex wife Nicole Brown Simpson, and waiter Ronald Lyle Goldman were found dead. Enough evidence was gathered to prove guilt against O.J, and Under the California State Penal Code Section 187A, O.J Simpson was charged with murder. The prosecution did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that O.J Simpson was guilty because the evidence was circumstantial and not definitive enough for a conviction. The O.J Simpson trial was pivotal because it shed light upon the racial inequality and prejudice in the United States. After the Rodney King riots in LA, America took a very cautious approach to racial injustices. Prosecutor Christopher Darden wasted no time in using the psychological approach to appeal to jurors, by portraying O.J Simpson as a jealous and abusive husband to ex-wife Nicole. To the contrary, defense lawyer Johnny Cochran, focused on the ambiguous time line and O.J Simpson’s deteriorating health. The prosecution gathered multiple witnesses that testified against O. J Simpson. Nicole’s sister testified on how......

Words: 1334 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Examples Of Bias In Oj Simpson

...Justice System During the O.J Simpson Murder Case Throughout the course of American history, the era of the 1990’s certainly stands out. The justice system at the time seemed to have flaws, with it being put up to the test. Many infamous events happened during the 1990’s that defined the judicial system, including the Los Angeles riots, the Anita Hill-Clarence Thomas controversy, and the Bill Clinton-Monica Lewinsky scandal. However, no case during that time (or, arguably, in the 20th century) was as talked about as the O.J. Simpson murder case. On June 13, 1994, Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were found stabbed to death in the affluent Los Angeles neighborhood of Brentwood. The evidence found was pointing toward Nicole Brown Simpson’s husband- former football player Orenthal James Simpson. (Hunt, 17) The events leading up to his very infamous trial led to a whirlwind of media speculation. However, does the Simpson trial accurately display the flaws of the American judicial system at...

Words: 785 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay


...The O.J. Simpson Trial: How The Media Effects High Profile Criminal Cases Noah Norwood Florida State University Abstract This paper goes over the effects the media had on the O.J. Simpson case and how the media interfered. The O.J. Simpson murder case is touted as the most televised criminal trial in history and from the second the murders were discovered there was a media frenzy. On the night of June 12, 1994 the bodies of Nicole Brown and her waiter Ronald Goldman were found outside of Nicole’s condo both stabbed to death. The suspect, former athlete, icon, and actor Orenthal James (O.J.) Simpson was the main suspect of the crime. On June 16th, 1994 the LAPD pressed murder charges against him and placed a warrant for his arrest on which he agreed to turn himself in on June 17th 1994 at 11 A.M.. He would not show up to turn himself in and eventually the infamous White Ford Bronco police chase would ensue. Eventually O.J. would be brought in and face trial in what would subsequently lead to him being found not guilty. Throughout this paper we will go over the historical setting and the phases of the incident from the crime committed to the end of the trial. Along with this the effect the high volume of media coverage and publicity will be covered. Also research on how race and gender affected the outcome of this trial will be displayed. To conclude the O.J. Simpson murder trial was highly effected by the media interference from day 1, which caused a racial stir and a......

Words: 2197 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Case Study

...Flaws in the OJ Simpson Case Though the OJ Simpson Case was among the cases which received the largest followership in the history of America court cases, there were so many flaws, weaknesses and failures which were witnessed in the course of the case and even in the delivery of the judgment (Allen, 1996). Though OJ Simpson was found innocent of the crime that involved the death of his ex-wife, there is a lot of evidence which shows that the judgment of the case could have been otherwise. To begin with, the first flaw to this case was that the media was too much involved. Since OJ Simpson was a celebrity, this case attracted many media platforms and this made the case be talked everyone. The problem with the media is that most of the media platforms failed to capture and disperse information concerning the real issue in the case; rather they talked about other issues which were not of significant in the case. Most media platforms focused on the racial orientation of OJ Simpson. Since he was a black American, the media focused mainly on his race rather than the crime that had been committed in this case and for this reason, the judges seems to have changed their might on the outcome of the case. The judge’s decision seems to have been influenced by the way the media talked about racial orientation of the OJ Simpson. If the outcome of the case was otherwise, this could have sparked a lot of tension in US and there it may have pone of the reasons why the case outcome was......

Words: 1134 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

1995 Oj Simpson Case

...Oklahoma City Bombing and the notorious O.J. Simpson Trial. While these are not the only two, they are, arguably, the biggest events of the year. Each major event that took place in 1995 left a legacy to carry on, left its footprint on the pavement of life. Known as the “trial of the century” former NFL player O.J. Simpson was charged with the gruesome murders of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend Ronald Goldman, by stabbing, around 10:15 pm on June 17, 1994. What is so shocking about these murders is that Simpson had everything going for him. He “came out of the projects of San Francisco in the 1960s to establish a...

Words: 1302 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Oj Simpson Case Analysis

...O.J. Simpson Case Analysis The O.J. Simpson case is a landmark case in several ways. In the American legal system, this should have been an open and shut case because the evidence proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Simpson committed this crime and in the American legal system, the prosecution has the burden of proof to which prove the defendant committed a crime. The evidence collected in the Simpson case was sufficient for prima facie case to be presented to a Grand Jury for indictment. In other words, prima facie, or first look at the evidence was enough to prove that Simpson was involved in the murder of Nicole Simpson and Ron Goldman. From the beginning the Simpson case had many different undertones, such as political in regards to jury selection, which is why the prosecution choose to pursue the case in Los Angeles as oppose to Santa Monica. This became a pivotal decision that would probably affect many future cases where race could be involved. The list of evidence such as 911 calls to police by the victim Nicole Simpson six months before occurrence of actual crime is in a way, testimony to the fact that Simpson’s behavior was not civilized and that Nicole Simpson was feeling threatened. The “trace evidence” found at the crime scene near the body of the victims, such as bloody shoe prints, which were from a size 12 Bruno Magli shoe, and the blood from the gate, matched genetically with Simpson. Police also noticed a cut on Simpson’s left middle......

Words: 1723 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Crime Scene Management

...Discuss the importance of good crime scene management and the maintenance of sample integrity. This paper will firstly define the five building blocks, procedures and protocols that underpin good crime scene management. Secondly, the paper will argue the two most important factors that enable good crime scene management and sample integrity with reference to the highly publicised cases of OJ Simpson and Amanda Knox. Thirdly the paper will conclude to explain how good crime scene management and sample integrity is essential to enable successful convictions. A ‘crime scene’, refers to the primary or secondary area in which a suspected crime has taken place where physical evidence can be obtained. Such areas include indoor or outdoor locations, vehicles or persons as noted by Jackson and Jackson (2011). Upon identifying a crime scene one is presented with a myriad of information and questions. In order to obtain the answers and evidence the crime scene presents that may lead to a successful future conviction(s), there are a number of important principals, procedures and methods that must be stringently followed and managed by the police’s criminal investigative team. As Jackson and Jackson (2011, p.15) has noted, “The way in which scenes of crime are managed and recorded, and how the physical and digital evidence is located, collected, packaged, labelled and stored, are all fundamental to the success of subsequent forensic examinations.” The main objective of the......

Words: 1942 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Touchstone Paper English 131

...short piece of writing about the cruelty and destruction of the world we have today. Edward provides a cautious awareness about the many incidents that happen today between cops, people, and the courts that either go unexplained or end unfairly. Some great examples provided include the OJ Simpson case and the death of Eric Garner; the jury unfairly depicted both of these cases. Edward emphasizes the problems of America including: race. People tend to see America as improving, but in reality we are falling behind in all aspects, such as education, race and freedom, law enforcements, neighborhoods, and Capitol and state houses. “I can feel that same discomfort in my throat that I know he must have felt—when you've got more words left inside than your voice has the strength to say”(2). This quote is very significant in providing empathy with strong emotions and weaknesses. The author here provides us with this quote twice in the article, once at the beginning and another in the middle. I think the author did the repetition of the same quote to emphasize his feelings (pain) towards the careless effort of the authorities and laws. Reading how strong the author feels of situations against race reminded me of the article, “Mad, Sad, Glad, Fear, Shame,” by Peter Putnam. Edward feel sad to see that many people have gone innocent due to the corruption of the police enforcement. He shows his sadness through the discomfort in his throat. But it also seems that Edward is ashamed of......

Words: 759 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Law and Arrignement a house or something expensive. If you leave before your trial the property becomes the property of the state (Meyers J). If you decide to skip out trail, which is known as bail jumping is a separate crime. The consequences would be that you would receive a bench warrant for your arrest. The trial could go on without your presence and if you are caught at a later time. You could give up all your right to appeal your case. It is not out of the ordinary for your attorney and the prosecutor to discuss your case. It is known as a side bar or bench conference in this meeting a plea bargin could be struck and the charges reduce. Your attorney usually discusses this after his bench conference. If the charges are serious they may not be discussed at the arraignment, and may be asked to appear in front of a grand jury. Your attorney may ask you if you want to speak on your own behalf (Cowling A.C.). If the case goes to the grand jury your lawyer has to prepare if you have any witnesses and to present you case in front of a jury...

Words: 552 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Writing Sentences and Paragraphs able to assist lawyers with depositions, drafting of pleadings, subpoenas and, other legal documents is a very fulfilling task. There is one particular event that inspired me and propelled me into pursuing a career as a paralegal and that’s – watching and reading the civil case brought against Orenthal James Simpson (O.J), by the family of Ronald Goldman and Nicole Brown Simpson in 1997 - ( The depth in which the depositions were done and the discovery process led to a successful win in the civil trial. The success of the civil suit in my opinion was mainly due to the adequate and proper research that was done, no stones were left unturned and, even though O.J was found not guilty in criminal court for the death of Ron Goldman and, Nicole Brown Simpson respectively he was held responsible for their deaths in civil court. Seeing the outcome of the civil trial against O.J, I knew that I would really enjoy being a paralegal and, to be able to work for some of the best lawyers here at Finnegan & Wicker Law Firm, makes becoming a paralegal worthwhile. I sincerely hope that I can become a part of your prestigious organization and team. Nickey Simpson Paragraph 2 Hi Debbie, how is my favourite cousin doing? I’m writing to inform you of a position that has become available at Finnegan & Wicker Law Firm, where I’m employed. My boss Mr John Wicker Snr is seeking a reliable assistant and, I do believe that you......

Words: 507 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Why Is Oj Simpson Guilty

...O.J. Simpson is guilty of killing his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald Goldman. There is an enormous amount of evidence that proves that he did. He had a motive, but not a solid alibi. There are lab results dealing with blood, DNA, and fibers that place him at the scene of the murders. If that is not enough to prove him guilty, then there are also the witnesses that can place O.J. Simpson going in and out of the Rockingham estate on the day and around the time of the murders. Others have testified of threatening remarks they heard O.J. Simpson say against Nicole and police reports of violent actions he committed against her. Evidence proves that O.J. Simpson is guilty of killing Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman. O. J. Simpson had motive for killing Nicole Brown Simpson. He and his wife were having severe marital problems. There is proof of how bad their relationship was. She had her sister take pictures of her bruised body and lock them in a safe for future evidence if needed. Also, there were recorded 911 phone calls in 1989 and 1993 from Nicole during brutal attacks by O.J. When the police responded to...

Words: 1466 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Intro to Courts: Three Defenses

...State of California vs. Orenthal James Simpson ( O.J. Simpson murder case). Whereas in his initial defense Mr. Simpson claimed he was at home alone packing before he traveled to Chicago. He even had a witness named Rosa Lopez who claimed she saw his car parked outside his house during the time of the murders. Unfortunately for the defense her testimony was never able to reach the jury because his alibi fell through when Ms. Lopez was cross examined by the prosecutor on videoand could not account for the exact time she saw his car parked outside his home. A justification defense is when the accused accepts responsibility for the crime they are accused of, but then argues that the act the committed was justified due to the circumstances. This was the reason no charges were filed to Sarah McKinley. On New Year’s Eve 2011, two intruders armed with a 12 inch hunting knife threatened the lives of her and her infant child. She called 911 and before the police arrived at the scene the two men tried to make entry into the house through a barricaded door. With all lesser means exhausted she was forced to defend herself by means of shooting the first intruder as he made his way into the house. Upon the initial review of the case the Assistant District Attorney said that Sarah was acting in self-defense. The second intruder was later charged with first degree murder for acting as an accomplice while his partner committed a violent felony. This case sparked some controversy if the use......

Words: 554 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Summary Of The Oj Simpson Trial

...Areeb O.J Simpson Trial Summary During the OJ Simpson trial. OJ Simpson was the most beloved american athlete around his time. He was accused of murder of his fiance Nicole Brown Simpson and his two children. Some of the people of the jury had found him not guilty in 1995. OJ Simpson has sister went against him in the trial. Saying “She said that he was abusive, and very short tempered, and that he physically grabbed her in her crotch”. So he was not guilty but then after a 2 years he was sent to prison because of verbal abuse and was convicted in a kidnapping( he will be on parole in 2017). One of the main reasons he was found not guilty. But he would have to pay at least 6 million in damage. They saw at least the murder glove is not...

Words: 264 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Oj Simpson Case

...The murder case The People of the State of California v. Orenthal James Simpson has been one of the most controversial cases of this century. O.J. Simpson was tried for the murders of Nicole Brown-Simpson and Ron Goldman. He was found innocent though there were countless amounts of evidence found that incriminated him. With all of the evidence that appeared, O.J. Simpson should have been found guilty for those two counts of murder. On June 24, 1995, Nicole Brown-Simpson and Ron Goldman were found dead. Orenthal James Simpson, a former National Football star was viewed as the prime suspect of the two murders. Simpson was tried for the murders and found innocent though he had a history of violence with Nicole, DNA evidence was found along...

Words: 1319 - Pages: 6