Premium Essay

Smoking Ban Debate

In: English and Literature

Submitted By dhermus
Words 1165
Pages 5
The Smoking Ban Debate Smoking, a hot button issue that has gained momentum is on the verge of exploding. Smoking bans are the current answer to the growing backlash from the general public over second hand smoke, a controversial action which brings the subject of individual rights to the forefront. Tobacco use has been debated for hundreds of years, with the medical field describing tobacco use as a “deadly narcotic” as early as 1853. With momentum gaining a pinnacle, regulations implementing and enforcing smoking bans are widespread, with oppositions position that these bans impose on individual rights. David Hudson wrote “The Department of Justice once stated smoking as the single leading cause of death in the United States”. An author/ research attorney who specializes in First Amendment rights, his book, Smoking Bans, widely discusses the impact that smoking bans have protecting public health, while some believe it infringes on individual rights. Key issues surround the debate that revolve around individual choice, social responsibility, and governmental power, and with the issues bring a wide variety of interests. A 2000 lawsuit Supreme Court ruled the Food and Drug Administration was not allowed to regulate tobacco as a drug. To many, this seemed like a logical solution to a smoking culture glamorized by Hollywood in the 1950’s into the 1070’s. To others, it would have ineffective results as the Liquor Prohibition proved to be in earlier years. The Institute on Medicine Committee on Reducing Tobacco Use, in its publishing Ending the Tobacco Problem: A Blueprint for a Nation, references a 1964 US Department of Health report. This report linked smoking to lung cancer, bronchitis, and emphysema. It stated “after this publication the public debate over smoking could never be divorced from its documented adverse health...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Smoking or Non Smoking

...Smoking Ban Debates History and Debate of Smoking Ban A smoking ban is a public policy that includes criminal laws and health regulations that prohibit smoking in certain public places and workspaces. There are varying definitions of smoking employed in this legislation. The strictest definitions define smoking as being the inhalation of any tobacco substance while the loosest define smoking as possessing any lit tobacco product. There are many reasons why smoking bans originated, but most of these have medical origins. Research has shown secondhand smoke is almost as harmful as smoking in and of itself. The effects of secondhand smoke are relatively the same as smoking. Lung disease, heart disease, bronchitis and asthma are common. Those who live in homes with smokers have a 20-30 percent higher risk of developing lung cancer than those who do not live with a smoker. Many see it as unfair that others have to suffer the effects of secondhand smoke when they are not able to make the decision for exposur to it. Non-smokers who worked with smokers experienced a 16-19 percent increase in lung cancer rates. In this case, the worker had no choice but to face exposure to the smoke. Smoking bans remove these risks for many people. The National Cancer Institute, Surgeon General of the United States and National Institutes of Health all support smoking bans because of the statistics of second-hand smoke. Smoking bans are also imposed because they improve air quality in restaurants......

Words: 579 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Public Smoking Bans

...` Public Smoking Bans Maria Robbins Ivy Tech Community College ENGL 111-JOF-Research Paper Cooper-3830 November 4, 2013 Abstract The smoking ban has caused smokers to adjust their smoking behavior. Public places have banned the smokers from smoking inside their businesses. The smoking ban has caused smokers to make choices. This has decreased their smoking and some have been able to quit completely. Still there are people who have smoked their whole life and have chosen not to stop smoking. Smokers do not have the freedom to smoke in public places that they once had. The public smoking ban has been the center of debates, because smokers feel it is their right to smoke when and where they want. The non-smokers want to be able to go out and enjoy a smoke-free environment. Public Smoking Bans Public smoking has been a right the smoker has had for years. Only in recent years has the public smoking ban law been put in affect. It took many years of debating over the fact if smoking in public should be ban. Smoking is an individual choice, and it is an activity that is absolutely legal. However, some states have passed laws to prohibit the activity in public and in workplaces. This legislation has been the focus of many debates in statehouses and city-county councils throughout the country. The smoking bans forces a smoker to not be welcome to smoke freely in public. For years the non-smoker had to deal with going out......

Words: 3946 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Cigarette Smoking Needs Regulation in Public Places

...2011). Cigarette smoking in public places is a widely controversial topic. Many people are unaware of the actual history of smoking bans. People are also unaware who is affected by smoking regulation in public places, the effects on society, why it is important to solve the problem of cigarette smoking in public places in concern to regulation, and possible solutions that are out in the world to help solve this problem. The first known smoking ban occurred in 1590 and was given by Pope Urban VII during his short reign as pope. Anyone who was caught smoking or chewing tobacco near a church was excommunicated. It was not until the twentieth century that the health problems associated with tobacco use came to light in the public eye. This is the time when businesses provided smokers with their own separate locations, so they could smoke without exposing the rest of the customers to the dangers and annoyance of smoke (Reasons, pros, and cons, 2008). In the 1990s, California became the first state to issue a smoking ban, and this was in restaurants. Since that time, many cities have taken up the drive to ban cigarette smoking in public locations, particularly restaurants. In fact, recent estimates show that as many as thirty-four states have cities that have some sort of ban smoking laws (Reasons, pros, and cons, 2008). Over the past hundreds of years, smoking regulation has become a top priority for people to have a strong opinion on. Many have felt that smoking in public......

Words: 2098 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Smoking Should Be Banned in Public

...Intro: History of Smoking debate in Australia Discussion of first article * Lack of emotional reasons usually associated with smoking * Use of enforceability the main reason presented most logically * Punch line offering a different argument Discussion of cartoon * Humour * Both sides Conclusion Federal law bans smoking in all Australian Commonwealth government buildings, public transport, airports and international and domestic flights. All states are also subject to the plain packaging laws and health warnings of cigarettes and the cost of cigarettes has markedly increased to persuade people not to smoke. There are also varying laws across the states relating to smoking. For Victoria, smoking is banned in all restaurants and bars and enclosed spaces but has been allowed in public spaces. This issue arose in the media when a councillor on the Melbourne City Council sought to have smoking banned in all public spaces. The Age editorial (February 1 2013) ‘Smoke-free should not mean an outright ban’sets out its argument against banning smoking in public spaces is a dispassionate and logical way. What is most apparent about the editorial in its refusal to outline what smoking might do if inhaled by passers-by suggesting that the emotional and medical arguments about smoking are ‘done and dusted’ and most people accept that smoking is bad for health. Instead, the article puts forward the argument that smoking in public spaces in ‘unenforceable’. This......

Words: 765 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Evaluate the Responsibilities at Different Levels of Goverment

...Central government is in charge at a national level, it is positioned in London where the houses of parliament and the House of Lords have many different types of responsibilities. One of their responsibilities is to protect the whole country at a national level. The good thing about this responsibility is that it will make our country a safer place to live in by creating new laws and policies which will help protect the people either from drink/driving laws or smoking ban where they keep you from harm. The bad thing about this responsibility is only a selected few hundred MPs can make the choice and even through the people in the House of Commons are voted in by us, they may not do what is in our best interest and will vote on their principles and beliefs and they could have a bias opinion. An example would be the House of parliament and when they are in session they discuss lots of different issues and reports and in front of the speaker. Our country signs treaties with other countries so we can make deals with each other which are friendly and to help keep the peace and so we can be allies with each other this is also another responsibility. The good thing about this responsibility is that it will keep peace between our countries and there is no fighting going on and the less likely chance we will go to war where there will be death caused by bombs, gunshot wounds and a great deal of injury. In 1992, the UN sent more than 10,000 British troops over to Yugoslavia to......

Words: 1537 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Davao: No Smoking City

...WHO smoke-free city case study Advancing the enforcement of the smoking ban in public places – Davao City, Philippines © World Health Organization 2011 All rights reserved. Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to the WHO Centre for Health Development, I.H.D. Centre th Building, 9 Floor, 5-1, 1-chome, Wakinohama-Kaigandori, Chuo-ku, Kobe City, Hyogo Prefecture, 651-0073, Japan (fax: +81 78 230 3178; email: wkc@wkc.who.int). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by WHO to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any......

Words: 6764 - Pages: 28

Premium Essay

Smoking Ban

...Natallia Harry Professor Deavers ENG 111/9 12.09.09 Smoking bans Lately, the health hazards connected with "passive smoking" or "second-hand smoke" - also known as "environmental tobacco smoke”, have been gradually getting increased recognition. The majority of people in modern society are aware that smoking can cause health problems not only in smokers but in people nearby. In recent years many cities, districts and whole states have cracked down on smoking in public. As of October 2009, nearly 60 percent of the U.S. population, or more than 175 million people, live in areas that have passed strong smoke-free laws covering restaurants and bars – a figure that has nearly doubled in size in three years ( Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids). While the purpose of smoke-free laws is to protect health, some have expressed concern that an unintended side effect might be economic losses, especially within the hospitality industry. In fact, according to the Report of the Surgeon General ,who is the leading spokesperson on matters of public health in the federal government, “The results of all credible peer- reviewed studies show that smoke-free policies and regulations do not have a negative impact on business revenues … and they are the most effective way to improve worker and business health”( Report of the Surgeon General). The number of smokers in America is truly a staggering number; according to an in-depth study by the Institute of Medicine,......

Words: 3499 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Smoking Ban

...Smoking was socially acceptable in the past, however as society changes so do their views on smoking now. Banning smoking inside was the first step to reduce the use of cigarette smoke for people who don’t smoke. Now there is great concern about people smoking outside in groups. Outdoor smoking cannot be banded for people will find ways around it, but regulating outdoor smoking will have an effect. Regulating outdoor smoking would not limit the pollution of butts everywhere, or reduce the amount of second hand smoke inhaled and there is no hard proof on health factors from outdoor smoking. The pollution of cigarette butts everywhere will most likely to continue. Local state agencies should’ve taken inconsideration when banning indoor smoking. Where did they think smokers are going to put their butts when forced to smoke outside. It’s easier to throw butts on the ground than in an ash container. Or people who do smoke should police up after themselves, and then there wouldn’t be so much pollution. That will never happen! When the community is worried about butts being at parks and beaches, they need to be concerned about other pollutants as well. Such as broken glass, or garbage that wasn’t thrown away. Maybe it’s time that cigarette companies start making biodegradable filters, so there would be no pollution. Can outdoor second hand......

Words: 957 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Old Smoke Bus 309

...look at what other companies in my field are doing with smoking policies. Companies are passing more and more no smoking laws for employees even going as far as employees cannot smoke on the grounds of work. With these considerations I would come up with a designate smoker’s area for my smoking employees. Charles will need to consider her opinion because she is the only employee that can complete an extremely important report for the company. Charles could show his smoking employees how to complete the report for his managers. I find it disturbing personally that a company still allow employees to still smoke inside the building. Then to allow employees to air out the room by opening windows this obvious cannot be healthy for anyone involved. I feel breaks should be built into the work day to insure productivity is still kept at a maximum. Maybe two breaks and lunch for all employees. I think of the companies that are banding smoking from the entire campus how is this being handled. I would definitely build in breaks into the work day and make a designation smokers area outside of the work area for smokers. I would call a meeting for smoking employees first then for non smoking employees explain my decision and the rights of both parties. I would then call a meeting for all employees explaining the respect for all parties involved and promoting a healthy work environment. I would recommend the policy of designating smoking areas...

Words: 769 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Employee Health Behaviors

...The impact of employee personal health behaviors can affect health care costs, job performance, and productivity. There are several ways organizations can attempt to tackle poor health habits of employees. The challenge for employers, however, resides in staying within legal and ethical boundaries when addressing such issues as obesity and smoking. Regulation of employee lifestyles by employers is becoming a more prevalent issue, but laws regarding this practice vary by jurisdiction. Organizations can protect themselves from legal trouble and ethical issues by implementing constructive programs aimed at improving the health of their workforces rather than engaging in discriminatory practices against overweight employees and smokers. Weight discrimination can be an issue in any industry so it is important that managers are aware of the laws regulating such practices. Obesity is a health problem and some employers assume that overweight employees will incur more illness-related absences and contribute to higher health care costs. Research shows that overweight employees are more likely to be subjected to discrimination in terms of hiring, treatment, and retention (Roehling, 2002, p. 177). While most states do not have laws protecting workers from discrimination based on weight per se, some protection is afforded under the Americans with Disabilities Act, where a certain level of obesity is considered an actual disability (p. 181). In addition to employment protection...

Words: 933 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Indoor Smoking Analysis

...Analysis of the: Taxable revenues reported before and after enactment of the Indoor Smoking Ordinance by Minneapolis businesses with on-sale liquor licenses: A comparison of revenues for the 6-month periods from April through September in 2003, 2004, and 2005 This report is an analytical report that is evaluating the impact that a non-smoking ban had on the food and beverage industry serving the people of the city of Minneapolis. This is a non-bias report to provide statistical information for the citizens of Minneapolis to better educate them on the ramifications of their city’s council vote against smoking at a food and beverages establishments. In 2005 the city of Minneapolis enacted a citywide indoor smoking ordinance, which included restaurant and bars found within the city. The representatives for the restaurants and bars claimed that by enacting this law would negatively affect their livelihood. They claimed that they would have an extreme loss of revenue because of the close association between the consumption of alcohol and the smoking of cigarettes especially by people frequenting these types of establishments. The representatives of the local hospitality industry continue to make these claims and requested that this study to validate their position with hopes to have the law reversed. The city also wanted to do this study to combat other similar studies with negative results from groups attempting to have the ordinance changed. The organization......

Words: 795 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Marijuana

...would be simply because it’s not killing me. We walk by people every-day who smoke cigarettes out in the open. On the sidewalk and outside of building entrances. Not illegal, but the second hand smoke is just as deadly, following with third hand smoke that sticks to clothing and other materials. This has been proven to kill, slowly and painfully while it also drains our bank accounts. In my eyes this is murder by the companies and manslaughter or homicide by the people who smoke. My views will never be justified but yet we overlook this, turn the other cheek while each year; according to the United States center for disease control and prevention “about 443,000 deaths occur each year” (CDC, 2012). There are rallies, lawsuits to ban or limit smoking. Yet little to no progress shows. Marijuana does not kill and is not harmful to the body at all. In fact the only reason people claim it is harmful is because back in 1930 the bureau launched an unscientific campaign claiming that marijuana use provokes insanity, homicidal tendencies, and uncontrollable lust. Not one of these backed up with proof. The scare tactic stuck through until the 1970’s where use started to grow and illegally people were using it in groups or single as an escape, as a narcotic. Backed by the American medical association with proof of positive therapeutic uses, people...

Words: 802 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Assignment Two

...come back into my office. I would politely remind her that she had a job to do and regardless of our personal feelings about smoking we had work that had to be completed. I would also remind Darlene that her feelings would be considered and let her know I intend to find a solution that will satisfy everyone which included scheduling a meeting with the department to address the issue. After that conversation, I would ask for Darlene’s patience while I work with everyone through the issue. I would mention some of the things I plan to do in the short term while we reach a permanent solution. I would also mention to Darlene that maybe the approach she took toward me as her supervisor may not have been the best choice. I would not necessarily reprimand her for being insubordinate to me at that moment because I would not want Darlene to feel like I was threatening her but it would be noted in my file on her to be discussed at review time when the tension may not be as high as it is now. I would offer suggestions to Darlene on obtaining the files needed to complete the report like getting the files needed and take them to her desk. That would reduce the amount of time she would have to spend in the file room. I would make sure she understood that not completing this report could put our entire office in trouble. 2) Describe the policy on smoking that you would recommend to Redwood Associates. Assignment Two - 3 I would recommend the (ETS) Environmental Tobacco...

Words: 722 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Marketing Plan

...Family Restaurant Family Restaurant The purpose of this paper is to clearly provide a marketing analysis of the current business, recommendations for change, show how that this will help continue the family legacy in doing all things right in regards to the business with pride and passion, and turn a profit. An actions items list will be offered as to clearly know what should be completed. The business should be known for all things good as it relates to the restaurant business. As I begin the analysis of the current plan we find that this is a family business to which we want to carry on the family legacy of providing a service to the community and at the same time make a profit. In doing this time is of the essence as the current owners have to leave their employers to continue the legacy. The business is losing sales and profits for many reasons. The lack of an on-site manager affects the daily business operations. The community is small but the location is prime real estate being centrally located by the interstate as well as truck parking. Competing with the likes of McDonald’s, Subway, and Sonic cause the business to have serious competition. Allowing individuals to smoke at the tables has also caused to help lose some business. The use of “daily specials” is good and will need to be continued, but the menu can should be changed from time to time. The pies that are being made daily are a good as well. The lack of an online tool or webpage to get the...

Words: 980 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Smoking Ban

...different positions on the smoking ban which are presented in the texts. In text one, we meet Robin McKie who is a science editor of the British newspaper, The Observer. The statement itself in text one is definitely clear. It already appears from the title “Benefits of smoke ban will be felt at once”. He claims that the smoking ban will actually benefit the people of England. Robin McKie’s argumentation is very objective, and is based on scientific documentation which supports his claim. All the numbers and fact that are given up throughout the text, makes it obviously very difficult for anybody to argue against the claim of the science editor. However, in text two, it is a completely different opinion that appears. The text is written by A.N Wilson, a British novelist and biographer, who claims that the smoking ban definitely will affect Britain negatively. In contrast to Robin Mckie, A.N Wilson uses examples of many well-known English novelists who had been smoking during their famous works, as a support for his statement. Furthermore he explains how the smoking ban symbolizes an attack on the basic liberty as it denies the right of a human decision whether to smoke or not. The claim of the last text separates from the former texts. The text is written by Simon Jenkins who is a British newspaper columnist. Simon Jenkins explains that if it was a decision that should have been made by local authorities, it would then be a good thing to have a smoking ban. At the same......

Words: 1149 - Pages: 5