Free Essay

Social Movements in Egypt

In: Social Issues

Submitted By aamr
Words 2536
Pages 11
Amr Amr
12/10/2013

Egypt Burning: How one Egyptian revolutionary movement overthrew a dictator while one another overthrew a democracy.

On the 17th of December, 2011 a vegetable vendor lit himself on fire in response to the corrupt and inefficient bureaucratic system in Tunisia. This small event by an unknown vendor led to the biggest and fastest spread of social movements in the history of the Arab world known as the Arab spring. Yet while the Tunisian example has been seen as relatively successful, in Egypt things seems to be more complicated and difficult especially with two different social movements, the first mobilized on the 25th of January and overthrew the long time autocratic ruler Hosni Mubarak, while the second had its beginnings in December of 2012 led to the overthrow of the first democratically elected president on June 30th of the following year was able to rally the biggest protest in modern history. This research paper’s goal will be to analyze the two social movements, their origins, make-up, organizational structure, their image abroad and finally their conclusion. For example why did the January 25th movement, which had clear goals from the onset and an extremely diverse make up ranging from secular liberals to conservative Islamists get sidelined and collapsed after achieving their first goal? And why did the Tamarod movement (rebel in Arabic) which had its origin in a petition form and was able to garner more active support, including the average non politicized Egyptian, was looked upon as undemocratic by the majority of the democratic nations and their overthrow of the Mohammed Morsy as a coup? Three days after the January 25th revolution a remarkable event occurred. The Muslim Brotherhood, a secretive conservative group with the goal of increasing the influence of Islam in public life and government, joined the secular youth groups that made up the initial January 25th movement. Islamist and Secularist, movements on the right and the socialist left all united in achieving the goals set by the movement: Bread, Freedom, and Social Justice. Yet why and how where all these different groups able to unite? To answer this question one must first look at the recent history of Egypt to see what alienated such a diverse assortment of groups into rebelling against the state. Mubarak comes from a line of military leaders who took control of Egypt since the 50s in response to British colonial policies and while both his predecessors put down Islamist dissent, they had the broad support from the rest of the Egyptian populace who supported their nationalistic and socialist ideologies. Yet unlike his predecessors Mubarak only played lip service to those ideologies, seemingly more concerned with bringing Egypt into the free market system which seemed to enrich him and his close associates while impoverishing the lower classes. By not only forgoing the ideologies that got support of the majority of the population but continuing to suppress Islamic movements, none of the mosaic of Egyptian movements felt that the autocratic leader where defending their interests. Shukrallah in her article sums it up by stating that ” It is all these grievances that started to come to the surface particularly in the past five years where daily protests by different sectors of the population became the norm. These protests included a wide variety of the population that never before took part in any political or even economic movements. As people became more desperate, fear of the police decreased and protesting became infectious.” Adding on to this new found zeal for revolt by these various groups was the fact that Mubarak, though just one cog of the state, symbolized all the injustices committed by it. Make it easier for these movements to unite against a tangible target. Yet as Hellyer states in his article “How the June 30 Uprising wasn’t the January 25 revolution”, “The January 25 revolution was not about Hosni Mubarak per se, but about the insistence on building a future based on bread, freedom, social justice and human dignity. The removal of Hosni Mubarak was a necessary, but insufficient, precondition for that to happen.” And herein lies the weakness of the movement, while having Mubarak, an autocratic leader, be the poster boy for all these injustices, his removal soon after led to the disintegration of the revolution and its coalition. With such broad goals, as freedom and human dignity, each group interpreted in the frame of its own ideology whether that meant establishing these goals through a democratic state based on sharia law championed the various Islamic groups or a secular civil state espoused out by the liberal youth groups, “When the various Egyptians protested in Tahrir Square, that utopian vision of what Egypt could become, the ideas of freedom and justice were agreed upon across the board. But once you stepped out of that square you realized that the idea freedom you were fighting for was in fact completely different than that of your bearded comrade.” (Khalil, 125) This disintegration led to only surface level reforms and to a very contentious and sectarian transitional period. Unfortunately for those that began the initiative for the January 25th revolution, getting rid of Mubarak was the easiest goal to achieve. For a social movement to be successful, it must either be coopted by the state or completely replace it if one is to follow the Marxist example and what the initial revolutionaries of the 25th movement failed to realize was that Mubarak was only one of many components of the state. The youth, the foundation of the revolution, had set radical reforms to take place after the ouster of Mubarak, such as wide ranging Police reform, radical institutional reform, and for civilian oversight of the army to achieve a true democratic civil state. Yet as Jeff Goodwin and James Jasper state in The Social Movements Reader, “If nothing else, the state lays down the rules of the game within which protesters maneuver, and if they choose to break those rules they are likely to encounter punitive action from the police or armed forces.” And what these youth groups failed to realize it was the Egyptian Army, the most venerated institution in Egypt now responsible for the transitional period, not Mubarak who were the true power behind the state. And as they began clamoring for these radical reforms the Generals fought back by demonizing the protesters, calling them foreign agents, and claiming that their ongoing protesting was damaging the already weakened economy. This led to a loss of support from the ordinary Egyptian, including those who did not participate in the overthrow, known as the couch party. As an Egyptian labor worker said during an interview by the Christian Science Monitor “Right now I am focusing on achieving an adequate minimum wage for the workers, but there are so many obstacles and many people see labor protests as a way of disrupting the country’s stability. And if there’s anything Egyptians have cared about the most since the Pharaohs, it’s stability.” With no broad support from the overall population, the coalition broke apart, which led to the Islamist taking advantage of the rift by siding with the army and reaching power, controlling half the Parliament and the presidency. And this is where the Tamarod movement, the leaders of the June 30th revolution, succeeded. Not only did the Tamarod movement and the Army share a secular and nationalistic ideology, the Morsy presidency had alienated the Army and the average populace with economic blunders and its incapability to deal with terrorist attacks plaguing the nation. With the backing of such a powerful institution and the support of the “couch party”, Tamarod had the green light to organize mass demonstrations to oust the Muslim Brotherhood president. As Maha Azzam states in the article “Egypt’s Tamarod and the military united for now” “Their success is not down to collecting signatures and protesting, it's down to the backing of the armed and security forces," Yet this was only possible as "The military wanted to be sure it had a mandate from the people," a valuable resource with which it gained the support of the State, in essence Tamarod coopted the State into mobilizing to overthrow its head as it saw the movements goals mutually beneficial. And in return Tamarod guaranteed its survival after the coup by following the military’s rules, unlike the previous revolutionary movement, by supporting the following harsh crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood which now found itself playing the role of the opposition. “We’re happy about the military's involvement in the fight against terrorism and violence as practiced by the Muslim Brotherhood," according to a Tamarod statement. This summer’s events proved how essential institutions can be to the success and the survival of a movement. Yet It’s this position of excluding the Muslim Brotherhood and its various Islamist allies and supporting the army’s brutal crackdown which led to the death of at least 300 “anti-coup” activist that led it to be almost shunned by the international community who saw this as military interference and not a revolution. Yet in both the January 25 and June 30th case, the army nudged out both presidents so why was one seen as unprecedented revolution and the other as a shameful interruption of democracy? How the rest of globe views a social movement can be essential as domestic support, especially in this globalized world, can make or break the outcome of a revolutionary outcome. In fact, it is a movement’s ability to manipulate different forms of media that can make it gain or lose support domestically and internationally. We cannot forget that it was the daily pictures and news reports of the bloody combat in Vietnam that fueled support for the antiwar movement in the late 60s early 70s. While the effects of Facebook and Twitter are hotly debated, it can’t be argued that social media was a powerful weapon in the January 25 movement’s arsenal. But not only did it have organizational possibilities, it helped gain it international support as the world followed the revolution on the web, with the activists determined for the world to view the events as they were happening, in the attempt to coax friendly nations to pressure Mubarak out of power. Wael Ghonim, a renown google executive and social activist, describes in his book Revolution 2.0 how social media was integral in garnering international support for their movement, “The most powerful consequence of this revolutionary tide is to challenge the false separation between a country’s ideals and its interests. And we did through Facebook! We showed the Western government that our government did not represent or protect its own people, we showed the world that they had lost all sense of legitimacy at the click of a button!” Yet according to the article “Social Media in the Egyptian Revolution: Reconsidering Resource Mobilization Theory”, while these “revolutionary” Facebook groups were able to mobilize the more passionate and energetic youth, their messages could only reach less than half the population with internet usage reaching only 31% in 2011. “While Facebook united Egyptian teens in Cairo against the regime, farmers in upper Egypt whose only source of information would be newspapers, most likely those sanctioned by the state [..] And the youths were in conflict with the Army, these farmers saw nothing but a bunch of troublemakers harming their livelihood.” (Eltantawy, 16) So why did the June 30th revolution, which brought to the iconic Tahrir Square the biggest protest in the history of the world, lack the humanitarian image that the previous revolution reveled in but was able to mobilize even more Egyptians then the Facebook savy 25th movement supporters? In the article “The June 30 Revolution in Egypt: A False Pregnancy” , Dr. Mohen Saleh explains how the Tamarod movement’s decision to pass a paper petition instead of using social media, a tactic more efficient in Egypt with more than half the population having no access to the internet, “…kept the snowballing movement out of the international eye. Let’s just say it isn’t as sexy as having a group of internet savvy youth posting images and videos of oppression with their iPhone.” By ignoring to use a product of the west, Social media, especially in the age of Facebook activism, the world seemed to completely ignore the bubbling frustration in Egypt with the democratically president. In fact news stations didn’t begin reporting on the movement until the president was overthrown by the Army, 6 month after the Tamarod movement began mobilizing its resources. But in the end, Tamarod’s decision to focus their attention on spreading this print petition, from the coastal city of Alexandria to the Bedouins of the Sinai desert that allowed to mobilize the biggest protest ever recorded. Such a simple form of getting their message across allowed them to access constituents of all socioeconomic and geographic backgrounds. Yet the question remains, out of all these advantages and disadvantages, how was the June 30th revolution able to garner more support from the wider population then its parent revolution? One must only look at present events to answer it. After the overthrow of the democratically elected Morsy, his supporters formed a counter movement called the Rabaa movement, which emulated tactics used by both the January 25th coalition and the Tamarod movement yet they lacked one essential resource and that is the support of any institutions. In fact every essential institution from the respected Judiciary to state media mobilize to demonize the Rabaa movement, such as headlines claiming that its suppression was on a war on terror. Through this analysis we can safely assume that while many factors can determine the success or failure of a movement, it is the support or lack thereof of institutions that can change the tide of ongoing events.

Bibliography
Goodwin, Jeff and James M. Jasper. The Social Movements Reader: Cases and Concepts. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009. Print.
Khalil, Ashraf. Liberation Square: Inside the Egyptian Revolution and the Rebirth of a Nation. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2012. Print
Ghonim, Wael. Revolution 2.0: The Power of the People Is Greater Than the People in Power: A Memoir. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt; First Edition edition, 2012. Print.
Eltantawy and Julie B. Wiest. “Social Media in the Egyptian Revolution: Reconsidering Resource Mobilization Theory.” International Journal of Communication 5. (2011): 1208-1220. Print.
Azam Mahaa. “Egypt's Tamarod and the military united for now.” English Ahram (2013): 1034-67. Print.
Shukrallah, Alaa. “An overview of the January 25th revolution.” International Viewpoint 9 March 2011, http://internationalviewpoint.org/spip.php?article2015
Helley,H.A. “How the June 30 Uprising Wasn’t the January 25 Revolution.” Brookings July 21, 2013, http://www.brookings.edu/research/opinions/2013/07/21-revolution-egypt-hellyer
Salef, Dr.Mohsen Moh’d. “The June 30 Revolution in Egypt: A False Pregnancy.” Al-Zaytouna Centre for Studies & Consultations August 2013, http://www.alzaytouna.net/en/publications/articles/151613-the-june-30-revolution-in-egypt-a-false-pregnancy.html
Loveluck, Louisa. “Why Egyptians don't care about Khaled Said, whose death began their revolution.”The Christian Science Monitor October 2013, http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Middle-East/2013/1003/Why-Egyptians-don-t-care-about-Khaled-Said-whose-death-began-their-revolution

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Role of Social Media

...Faizan Ahmed Khan 15020568 Professor Erum Haider Pol 320 6 May 2014 How do social media shape the social movements in modern times? A comparative study of Ukraine Crimea crisis and Egyptian revolution for democracy! A social movement can look like and be called many things. Whatever their appearance or name, the goal of all social movements is presumably the same: a change for the better. If this is indeed the ultimate objective of a social movement, it is well worth considering how successfully a movement achieves that objective. In the past ten years, several social movements have grabbed the world’s attention for the change they promised. Deemed successful for achieving their goal of change, though not necessarily change for the better, further evaluations have been sparsely performed. However, in judging social movements, what happens is shaped to a greater degree by the media, specifically. We shall look at modern day Egypt and Ukraine in our analysis. The effect of social media—and the Internet more generally—in both sets of protests is undeniable yet also distracting. Like most historic events, these protests and revolutions were in part possible due to a new technology. Flipping through the pages of history we see that The Reformation in Europe was aided by the invention of the printing press; the revolutions of 1848 occurred in some respect thanks to the invention of the telegraph which transmitted news across Europe of one set of protests overnight; the age of modern...

Words: 2808 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

“the Facebook Revolution”: Social Networking Sites and the Correlation with the January 25 Revolution.

...Revolution”: Social Networking Sites and the correlation with The January 25 Revolution. 1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY Information and communication technology increasing with the growing variety of Internet based applications. This new media is not only "library information" to facilitate the dissemination of information to a universal audience, but even more than that. This media is also a powerful tool for communication activities. Furthermore, with Web 2.0 technology, design and use of the Internet has changed much work to do with this new media that Levinson (2009) call this "new new media"- more new than the new media- which shows variances against the classic new media such as e-mail and websites. This media is not merely a tool to facilitate distribution, archiving and text-based, but has become a tool for social media who have the capability delivering media content and providing interaction facilities between readers and writers. Andreas Kaplan and Michael Haenlein (2010) define social media as "a group of Internet-based applications that build on the ideological and technological foundations of Web 2.0 and that allow the creation and exchange of user-generated content (photos, videos, links, etc.)." In addition, it is also one of the latest communication channels that enable dissemination and sharing of information can be done quickly and widely through the new media. Undeniably, the year 2008 is seen as the social media development...

Words: 3378 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Invisible Arab

...The book is in the perspective of an Arab and not by someone within the Western media/culture. He writes about the Arab revolutions and the history behind it. Mr. Bishara debunks several thoughts of how the Arab revolutions started and how the media (both Arabic and Western) have played a major role within these causes. Mr. Bishara’ book is self-described as an essay in which he reflects on the history of the revolutions up until present and how social media and the Arab youth population played a part. He credits the youth of being able to over throw decade old customs, governments, and regimes. In addition, he describes the rise of many positive organizations that formed because of the revolutions such as women’s groups, sports teams, and a higher employment rate. Although he praises the rise of these types of organizations, Mr. Bishara faults the lack of organization and commitment to principles as the basis of what is wrong with many Islamic groups. Throughout the book, Mr. Bishara calls the Arab movements as revolutions and never mentioning it as what we have defined as the Arab Spring. The term "Arab Spring" was coined after the United States invasion of Iraq in 2003. There is no true definition of what the Arab Spring truly means, however, many define it as being the start of protests in...

Words: 2097 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

3- What Role Did the Nasser and Sadat Presidencies Play in Shaping Political Islam in Egypt?

...Political Islam is playing a major rule now in the current political scene; so it is important to analyze how it rose in Egypt and how it has been shaped over the years. The political Islam is mainly a set of ideologies that holds the belief that Islam can be a political ideology as much as it is a religion. Although Islamic thinkers have always emphasized the enforcement of the Islamic law (Sharia) as the main reference of the state’s political and social ideologies, they never agreed on the exact means and degree of enforcing it. This difference of course dates back to the early times of Islam when different interpretations lead to a schism in the guided Caliphate called the Great Fitna which results we have to bear with until today. As the Islamic Thinker Mohamed Abdu suggested the Holy text is “alive” in the sense that its interpretations differ greatly depending on the background of the interpreter, these different interpretations lead to the forging of different schools of thought and Madhabs. And as political Islam is directly derived from Islamic teachings and has been affected by the differences in interpretations, Political Islam has never been united under one banner. The Ex Egyptians presidents Gamal Abd El Nasser and Anwar El Sadat had their different ways in dealing with the Islamists and of course helped in shaping political Islam in Egypt. Before Gamal Abd El Nasser, Egypt’s second president, Islamist groups were largely concerned with seeking independence from...

Words: 1840 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Egypt's Uncertain Transition Towards Democracy

...Egypt’s Uncertain Transition Towards Democracy What is Egypt’s relationship with democracy? A question that has become increasingly controversial ever since the “Arab Spring”. This paper is going to be addressing Egypt’s relationship with democracy as it assesses its transition into it over the years. For a considerable length of time Egypt has been in a crisis. Not only has their economy taken a turn for the worst but there is also a strong sense of aloofness between the government and Egyptian subjects. Executive power has been passed from the hands of President Honsi Mubarak, to the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, then won by present president Mohamed Morsi, up until he was removed from office, and now is the second transitional period that is pro the rise of Abd El Fattah El Sisi as Egypt’s new to-be elected president. The questions raised here are, was democracy ever achieved at any point in these different time periods and what is in store for the future? The 2011 pro-democracy demonstrations across the Middle East and North Africa are akin to a wildfire. Their speed and effectiveness in removing ironclad autocrats has been bracing. But they have also been indiscriminate and largely unpredictable. The changes sweeping through the region haven’t led to uniform outcomes. Some of these dictators’ houses will be completely destroyed, burnt to ashes, while just across the street some will be untouched. Some dictators will fall – like Mubarak, their autocratic rule and...

Words: 4232 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Internet Activism

...blogs, news websites, and social media. This has given birth to a new form of activism which people call clicktivism - acts of activism done through the internet such as blog posts, sharing news articles etc on social media, and advertising activist movements through social media to spread awareness. The internet has made it easier to become an activist, the simple sharing of information to bring to light a subject you care about will be seen by many people. The argument I will be making in this paper is that...

Words: 1219 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Essay

...Gamal Abdel Nasser is an Arabic leader not only an Egyptian leader who made a lot of achievements for Egypt, the Middle East and Africa. Nasser was an important figure in the recent history of Egypt and had a great role in 23 July revolution; he was one of the leaders of the free officers’ movement. Gamal Adel Nasser was a brave solider who fought against Israel. Nasser was a significant leader who had revolutionary ideas that supported the free officers’ movement. Nasser was the most popular Arabic leader in his era and had a big role in all Arabs’ revolutions and also made an Arabian nationalism, which included a short period of unity between Egypt and Syria (The painful presidency of Egypt's Nasser, 1969). Nasser also encouraged a number of revolutions in the Arab countries and a number of other countries. Nasser as a magnificent leader had an affective role in the political and social life during his judgment and after his death. (Nowaira, 2010) In July 26 1956 Gamal Abdel Nasser took a great political decision. Nasser announced nationalizing the Suez Canal Company SAE to finance the Aswan high dam after the World Bank refused to finance the construction of the high dam. Nasser took that decision several years before the end of Britain’s contract of benefiting from the canal, which led to tension and escalation and bring hostility to Egypt. Nasser also increased tensions with France due to his support for the Algerian revolution. Meanwhile...

Words: 1352 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted

...With the development of technology, the development of social media became very popular. In “Small Change: Why the Revolution will not be Tweeted”, Malcolm Gladwell stresses that “real” revolutions do not depend on social media to be resolved or started; however, small revolutions can depend on social media or networking. Although Dennis Baron is sending the same message in “Reforming Egypt in 140 Characters?” there is one point that Baron makes that differs from that of Gladwell’s; Baron actually believes that a game changing revolution can occur with the use of social media. Gladwell believes that in order for a revolution to be successful, it does not have to rely on social media networks. In the beginning of his writing, he discusses the sit-ins that occurred in the 1960s. After acknowledging how fast the word spread about the sit-ins, Gladwell mentions that it happened without the help of “e-mail, texting, Facebook, or Tweeting” (314). Social media was probably not thought of in the 1960s. One of the biggest revolutions, the Civil Rights Movement, was accomplished without the need of social media. Also, it is easier to get participation on a social networking site rather that participation for something that is confronting a disgraced practice. Gladwell claims that it is easier for a person to donate blood rather than to protest for a certain reason; likewise, he decides that the reason for this rise of social media participation is by “lessening the level of motivation...

Words: 1114 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Women's Status in Egypt

...Running head: WOMEN’S STATUS IN EGYPT Women’s Status in Egypt Women’s Status in Egypt Introduction Modern Egypt is like its dynastic counterpart, drawing sustenance from the Nile River. Today, as in the ancient period, most of the country’s population is concentrated along the river, fully 20% of it around Cairo. Modern Egyptian society is identified not with the ancient civilization but with the Arab culture is overwhelmingly identified with Islam, the religion followed by 90% of Egypt’s population (Library). Much about women’s position in modern Egypt can be traced to a famous verse of the Koran: Men are the protectors and maintainers of women, because Allah has given the one more (strength) than the other, and because the support them from their means. Therefore the righteous women are devoutly obedient, and guard in (the husband’s) absence what Allah would have them guard. As to those women on whose part ye fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, seek not against them means (of annoyance): for Allah is Most High, Great (above you all) (Koran 4.34) Islam is strongly implicated in the generally inferior and subordinate social position of women. Particularly among the rural and lower socioeconomic classes – largely illiterate – an ethos of patriarchy predicated of Islamic law, or the sharia, has long been standard custom and practice. Over the course...

Words: 2203 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Social Meida

...In this era of the new and social media, does it really matter who owns the `mainstream’ media? “It is by the goodness of God that in our country we have those three unspeakably precious things: freedom of speech, freedom of conscience, and the prudence never to practice either of them.” (Clemens, 1897) Foreword According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights written up by the United Nations, its states that, “Whereas disregard and contempt for human rights have resulted in barbarous acts which have outraged the conscience of mankind, and the advent of a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief and freedom from fear and want has been proclaimed as the highest aspiration of the common people” (UN, 1948). Articles 19 to 21 specifically target the freedom of thought, conscience and belief of human rights that a Democratic government must abide by and Egypt is no exception. Arab Spring Turmoil has been brewing in Egypt, causing great pain to its inhabitants, destroying homes and families and creating complete mayhem in the process. The first marked incident according to The Guardian is on the 1st of January 2011; a suicide bombing attempt took place outside a Coptic Church in Alexandria. By the 25th of January Egypt finally joined the Arab Spring alongside Tunisia, Yemen and Algeria. The ‘Arab Spring’ was an activist movement by several Middle-Eastern countries in an attempt at freedom from political and religious oppression and authoritarian...

Words: 6419 - Pages: 26

Free Essay

Sociology

...y 1. Introduction Social media is gaining more and more acceptance and popularity as a practical and strategic method for communication and organization among wider group of people, making it an ideal platform for popular use. This paper attempts to stress the role of social media in shaping opinions and motivating collective actions. It draws example from the recent Arab revolutions in Tunisia and Egypt. In this regard, the paper will debate the arguments made by Malcolm T. Gladwell, is a Canadian journalist, bestselling author, peaker and a staff writer for The New Yorker since 1996. Malcolm was critisized by many Arab activists because of his contradictory views regarding the role of social media in the Arab Springas he made it clearly that he doesn’t think such tools amount to much. In an online chat that Malcolm Gladwell did for the New Yorker's website , he explicitly stated that the internet can be an effective tool for political change when used by grassroots organisations as opposed to a core crop of activated individuals. Thus, simply showing that the internet was used to publicize, and even organise protests in the Middle East does nothing to counter his argument. The paper would argue that social media could be very strong and powerful communications tool for a particular group of audiences as well as the general public. One value of using social media is that it is simple and can easily be used by various channels to deliver messages that are unique to...

Words: 2067 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Understanding the Modern Middle East

...over the nation-states. Modernity aids economics and provides the particulars of the evolution of history. (Lecture 2/1) Politics are central to history. Geography matters, it is important to the evolution of history. A religion is traditional and provides prologue. The role of ideology plays a huge part in my understanding of the modern Middle East. Saddam Hussain wanted a secularized government. The issue with his ideology is that secularism is modern, however religion is traditional. Palenstine historically a struggled with existed between secular and theocratic values. Secularism clashes orthodox Judaism and Israeli society. (Video 2/21) He was opposed to Islamic interest. (Lecture 3/20) Gamal Abdul Nasser , the second president of Egypt, and reigned from 1956 until his death. He introduceNassism to us because of these fundamental reason: he wanted to bring unity to all. Abortion of boundaries and is where Nasser wanted to rid the middle east of these boundaries because they do not...

Words: 1366 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Wilsonianism

...Wilsonianism or Wilsonian are words used to describe a certain type of ideological perspectives on foreign policy. The term comes from the ideology of United States President Woodrow Wilson and his famous Fourteen Points that he believed would help create world peace if implemented. A quote shows the basic effort of the Wilsonian movement “The first (and for some the only) defining element of Wilsonianism is the conviction that a leading priority of U.S. foreign policy should be the promotion of democratic government the world around—"national self-determination," as Wilson put it (Wilson, 2000). This means in its most basic definition, the ability of a community to choose its political destiny. Woodrow Wilson also believed that any legitimate government should be derived from the consent of the people it governs. Besides the literal definitions of Wilsonianism, there is much more meaning and context when it comes to the wilsonian movement that the ideology seemed to spark. The fourteen points were the original introduction of the wilsonian ideals, and were brought upon by fear of worsening global relationships, especially with European countries such as Great Britain. The fourteen points speech was given after the U.S. joined the allied powers and joined the World War. After remaining neutral for quite some time, the U.S. was essentially forced into joining the cause and listed out the fourteen points so as to not worsen relations after the war would be complete. The fourteen...

Words: 1690 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

None

...http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15435768 Abstract People often comment on the impact that technology has on people's social skills. Frequently, this lens is used to analyze the limits of social media . However, this paper moves away from simple social skills in seeks out the effects that social media has in generating a greater kind of change, social change. This paper analyzes the impact that social media can have on revolutions in the twenty-first century. I use the Arab Spring as a means to point out the strengths and weakness that social media forums can have on a revolution. Primarily looking at Twitter and the role that Tweets played during the Arab Spring, I outline the role that Social media can play in times of uprising. Like most things, moderation is key. While social media offers many benefits, in excess, it can generate chaos and present an apparent lack of directions. This ultimately raises the question of how will changes in technology change us and how we change humanity. Nathan Willis William Penman Interpretation and Argument December 2, 2013 Not Following the Leader: How Social Media Impacted the Arab Spring Introduction As long as there have been established governments, there have been revolutions to test them. In times past, these revolutions frequently came from people discussing their dissatisfaction with other members of their towns. The advent of the telegram allowed people to overcome the barrier that distance created. Yet, two major...

Words: 2498 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Miss

...Although coming under the sway of various empires and home to a variety of ethnicities, the Land of Israel was predominantly Jewish until the 3rd century.[1] The area became increasingly Christian after the 3rd century and then largely Muslim from the 7th century conquest until the middle of the 20th century. It was a focal point of conflict between Christianity and Islam between 1096 and 1291, and from the end of the Crusades until the British conquest in 1917 was part of the Syrian province of first the Mamluk Sultanate of Egypt and then (from 1517) the Ottoman Empire. In the late-19th century, persecution of Jews, particularly in Europe, led to the creation of the Zionist movement. Following the British conquest of Syria, the Balfour Declaration in World War I and the formation of the Mandate of Palestine, Aliyah (Jewish immigration to the Land of Israel) increased and gave rise to Arab–Jewish tensions, and a collision of the Arab and Jewish nationalist movements. Israeli independence in 1948 was marked by massive migration of Jews from both Europe and the Muslim countries to Israel, and of Arabs from Israel leading to the extensive Arab–Israeli conflict.[2] About 42% of the world's Jews live in Israel today. Since about 1970, the United States has become the principal ally of Israel. In 1979 an...

Words: 441 - Pages: 2