Premium Essay

Social Responsibility of a Business Is to Increase Profits

In: Business and Management

Submitted By at882
Words 759
Pages 4
The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profit
What is the social responsibility of a business? Is it to increase profits as American economist Milton Friedman argues? Is it to make decisions that benefit and protect society? According to the Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms, social responsibility is the “principle that businesses should actively contribute to the welfare of society and not only maximise profits”. In my view the statement ‘the social responsibility of business is to increase profit’ is true to an extent, however, I believe a corporation’s responsibilities extend beyond just maximising profits.
The ‘Narrow View’ argues that profit maximisation is the only objective for a business. Theodore Levitt wrote, “in the end business has only two responsibilities- to obey the elementary canons of face-to-face civility (honesty, good faith and so on) and to seek material gain” Levitt’s opinion could be perceived as realistic to an extent, however, I believe he doesn’t take into account the negative side-effects that business activities can have on society. Friedman strongly rejects any concept of corporate social responsibility that would deter a business’s primary goal of profit maximisation. Furthermore, he argues that only people can have responsibilities, not an artificial being such as a corporation. If an artificial being such as a business was to have responsibilities, however, than I would find it appropriate that it would be inclined to act in a way of the interest of the corporation, by increasing profits for workers and shareholders. However, a corporate executive with said “social responsibility” would be acting in some way that is not in the interest of employers, for example, refraining from increasing the price of products to prevent inflation, even though an increase in prices would be in the best interest of the…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

“There Is One and Only One Social Responsibility of Business–to Use It Resources and Engage in Activities Designed to Increase Its Profits so Long as It Stays Within the Rules of the Game, Which Is to Say, Engages in

...illustrates the social responsibility of business and the corporate social responsibility of the business. According to Friedman, the social responsibility only is to make the profit. “Corporate Social Responsibility is the continuing commitment by business to behave ethically and contribute to economic development while improving the quality of life of the workforce and their families as well as of the local community and society at large” (Baker, 2015). I do not agree with this statement under the stakeholder theory, I will explain the reason relate to the stakeholder theory. Explain this statement In this statement, “There is one and only one social responsibility of the business to increase the profit” In this sentence, we can see that the only social responsibility is to make the profit, whenever do the untrue things for personal gain. For example, to stolen competitor’s product to make the product. “The rules of the game, which is to say, engages in open and free competition without deception or fraud”. These rules is about side-constraints of the business, the company need to follow the rules, and they not be deception or fraud to become the free competition. Analysis of this statement By definition, stakeholder are the individual or groups that have an interest in the organization and are affected by its action. Actually, A corporation have can have legal, but also moral responsibility. “If the business wants to be sustained over time, must maximize its profit......

Words: 517 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ethical Standards Increase Efficiency

...Ethical Standards Increase Efficiency Presented to: The CEO of Company X Student Name: Student ID: Date: December 27, 2011 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 Introduction 4 Research Findings 5 Finding Number 1 5 Finding Number 2 6 Finding Number 3 7 Recommendations 8 Conclusion 9 References 10 Executive Summary Strong business ethics and social responsibility go a long way for businesses. My CEO had tasked me with researching how ethics and social responsibility affect our employees, reputation, and relationships. Promoting good ethical standards at first glance seems like the right thing to do, however through studying the research provided; they are also the smart thing to do. The information gathered for this report gives clear and definitive answers to the three main questions posed by the CEO of our company. The addition to business ethics can increase efficiency in our company’s employees. This would require the incorporation of a code of ethics in the company’s mission statement as well as having the human resources department designing and training employees on ethics. Having strong ethics within a company promotes trust from within, and a happy employee is a more productive employee. It is by no accident that almost 80% of corporations in the United States today have incorporated some sort of ethics program into their company. Generally, the reputation of a company with good social responsibility is higher than the......

Words: 3062 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Should Government Be Responsible for Csr?

...Government have the largest influence on Corporate Social Responsibility ? Introduction Carroll’s four responsibilities of business are economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary (Carroll, 1991). Economic responsibility is a business organization to produce goods or service to society, and creditors or shareholders can get return. Legal responsibility is defined in law by government that management is expected to follow. Ethical responsibility is organization management to obey the beliefs in a society. The last discretionary responsibility is the management of their own accord to take obligations, they do it by themselves, and not others force them to do (Carroll, 1991). Definition of Corporate Social Responsibility Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is defined as a business’s decisions or actions are made which take outcomes beyond the organization's economic profit into account in the decision making process (Carroll, 1991). Social responsibilities include ethical responsibilities and discretionary responsibilities. The difference between them was that less people expect a firm to perform discretionary responsibilities, while a lot of people expect a firm to perform ethical responsibilities. Discretionary responsibilities are like day-care centers, to training the hard-core unemployed and philanthropic contributions. A firm can take actions to perform its ethical responsibilities and discretionary responsibilities that society will value it but not......

Words: 2304 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Social Responsibly of Business Argument

...Social Responsibly of Business Argument PHI 103: Informal Logic November 3, 2014 In Milton Friedman’s article, “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”, published in The New York Time Magazine back in 1970 Friedman proposes the argument that a corporations social responsibility is to increase profits. “Milton Friedman’s article entitled The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profit is one of the most often used counter arguments for people who would eschew the idea that a corporation should consider more than just shareholders.” (College of Law) While creating a very debatable argument Friedman has opened my eyes to a topic of which I have never thought about or pondered. One premise that he makes is that only people or humans have responsibilities while a corporation may be considered an “artificial person” with artificial responsibilities yet an actual business cannot have social responsibilities. So does this mean corporations are to only look after themselves and shareholders and let customers deal with it? Working for the large corporation Ingersoll Rand I have seen first-hand that profit is more important than satisfied customers. For instance, there was a certain product my store was purchasing locally and selling it at different margins depending on the circumstances and customer. By purchasing this product locally we had the freedom to sell at basically whatever margin we wanted. Almost three......

Words: 1255 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Corporate Csr

...Profit Maximization and Corporate Social Responsibility Over the past few decades’ American companies have been obsessed with maximizing profits. This obsession has resulted in big businesses having some of the highest profit margins in history. To shareholders, this news couldn’t be better. But many times these high profit margins have come with a great price, and it is not the businesses that are paying for it. Milton Friedman’s famous article The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Profits, is considered by many to be the seminal piece of literature against corporate social responsibility. In his article, Friedman argues in favor of unrestricted profit maximization. While Friedman’s argument makes valid points discussing the simple nature of business in a capitalist market, he neglects to effectively address the complex issue of negative externalities that businesses impose on society. I will go on to discuss the errors in Friedman’s assumptions about the capitalist market, and explain how profit maximization can be achieved, while practicing corporate social responsibility. I will discuss more theories on why CSR is not only socially desirable; it is necessary to increase profits. Friedman’s belief that executives who practice CSR are   “…unwitting puppets of intellectual forces that have been undermining the basis of a free society these past decades. (31)” He goes to explain how people have responsibilities, not businesses, and that the......

Words: 455 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Social Responsibility of Business

...Social Responsibility of Business Introduction What is the social responsibility of a business? Is it to increase its profits as Milton Friedman affirms? Before starting any debate about this topic, first let’s see what its definition is. According to the Business Dictionary, social responsibility is an “obligation of an organization's management towards the welfare and interests of the society which provides it the environment and resources to survive and flourish, and which is affected by the organizations actions and policies. 1 ” Furthermore, according to the Dictionary of Finance and Investment Terms, social responsibility is the “principle that businesses should actively contribute to the welfare of society and not only maximize profits. 2 ”These two definitions are in total opposition to Friedman’s statement. Never the less, I do think that any corporation can be social responsible in terms of these opposing points of view at the same time. In this essay, I will first present a summary of the article of Milton Friedman; then I will express my personal reflection on the topic and tell why a corporation can comply with both positions simultaneously Milton Friedman in his article “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits” states that only people can have responsibilities, and that there is not such a thing like social responsibility of business. A corporation, according to Friedman, is an artificial person and, therefore, may have......

Words: 1574 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Social Responsibility

...Social Responsibility Views on Corporate Social Responsibility Abstract This dissertation examines R. Edward Freeman and Milton Freidman perspectives surrounding corporate social responsibility by summarizing their respective articles titled: “Stakeholder Theory and The Corporate Objective Revisited” and “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits”. By examining their articles, I will provide a personal opinion of which of their economic models should be the leading model when it comes to business and corporate social responsibility. Summary of Articles Author R. Edward Freeman’s article “Stakeholder Theory and The Corporate Objective Revisited,” emphasized a response to a piece put out by Sundaram and Inkpen titled “The Corporate Objective Revisited” by clarifying misconceptions about stakeholder theory and concluding that truth and freedom are best served by seeing business and ethics as connected (Freeman, Wicks, & Parmar, 2004). Freeman supports the above statement by providing the following three main critiques: 1) the mischaracterization of stakeholder theory; 2) the primacy of creating value for stakeholders, and; 3) the real issues of economic and political freedom (Freeman, Wicks, & Parmar, 2004). In response to social responsibility, Freeman clarifies that stakeholder theory claims that no matter what the ultimate mission of the corporations or any form of business activity, managers and owners must take into account the......

Words: 984 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Argument: the Morel Place of Corporation

...Edward Freeman and Milton Friedman both had great argument on social responsibility, Friedman argued that “There is one and only one social responsibility of business to increase its profits”. Friedman believed that taking on a social and moral issues is not necessarily effective for a company. This will place those corporations at a better competitive disadvantage if they do not focus on making their profit. Taking on social and moral responsibility is not economically feasible for the corporation. Corporations should just focus on earning a profit and leave social issues to others. It’s in the best interest of a corporation to not deal with social problems. However, if Friedman truly believed in that corporations have no social responsibility then it’s possible that corporations are encouraged to steal, defraud for their customers and shareholder. Looking at Freeman in the other hand, he believed in moral responsibility to all stakeholders. He believed that those people that are focusing on just profits and shareholder are greedy. As modern corporation continues to grow many social problems will accrue and it’s the corporate world responsibility to address those problems. In the long run it will increase the future of the company and reduce any governmental regulation. If large corporation can spend time addressing their social issues it will benefit, there company. Looking at environmental issues as an example, some corporations have had a negative effect on the......

Words: 630 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Caes

...Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2012 Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Does it Pay to Be Good? Harmony J. Palmer Claremont McKenna College Recommended Citation Palmer, Harmony J., "Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Does it Pay to Be Good?" (2012). CMC Senior Theses. Paper 529. http://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/529 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact scholarship@cuc.claremont.edu. CLAREMONT McKENNA COLLEGE CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE: DOES IT PAY TO BE GOOD? SUBMITTED TO PROFESSOR MATTHEW MAGILKE AND DEAN GREGORY HESS BY HARMONY J. PALMER FOR SENIOR THESIS FALL 2012 DECEMBER 3, 2012 Acknowledgements I have many people to thank for their help with this study. First and foremost, I want to thank my thesis reader, Professor Magilke, for all his help. This study would have be quite difference without his constant guidance and our numerous meetings and e-mail exchanges. Second, I would like to thank Mary Martin, the Reference & Instruction Librarian for Business and Law, at the Claremont Colleges Library. Obtaining the CSR data would not have been possible without her help and the library’s funding. Third, I want to thank the Kravis Leadership......

Words: 2440 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Corporate Social Responsibility

...Are corporations that participate in voluntary Corporate Social Responsibility practices seen as unethical through exploiting CSR initiatives for a profit? In today’s society, corporations that perform better in their respective markets are able to collect assets that are needed to participate in Corporate Social Responsibility practices. Through these voluntary practices corporations are able to improve their social, environmental, and human rights accounts. This essay will begin with an insight of what Corporate Social Responsibility is; furthermore it will elaborate on how corporations that participate in the practice of Corporate Social Responsibility are seen as unethical because it is able to exploit its initiatives in the pursuit of profits. The Corporate Social Responsibility initiative has developed significantly through the past few decades. This is because of many multinational corporations have been influenced by civil societies to adopt numerous voluntary initiatives. Corporations have been influenced into adopting programs that assist in improving their social, environmental, and human rights records (Utting, 2005, pg. 375). These corporations are expected to adopt new codes of conduct, which administrate their environmental management, the health and safely of their employees, partnerships with Non-Governmental Organizations, and increase their support for community development projects (Utting, 2005, pg. 375) Multinational corporations have started......

Words: 2036 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Corporate Social Responsibility

...Corporate Social Responsibility and Nonprofit Organizations Darin Leedy December 2009 Senior thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics at the University of Puget Sound Introduction Corporate social responsibility has taken on an increasingly prominent role in the business world in recent years. CSR has grown so popular that nearly every major company in the U.S. now integrates a significant commitment to social and/or environmental programs into its business model. CSR can be loosely defined as the adoption of socially beneficial and environmentally sustainable practices by corporate actors. The rise of CSR can be attributed to growing public disenchantment with traditional business practices that degrade the environment and compromise worker wellbeing, and resulting pressure from consumers and nonprofits on the private sector to reform itself. Instead of simply complying with government regulation, a company that is “socially responsible” adopts more stringent self-regulation ensuring that it is acting to minimize negative impact on the environment, its employees, its customers, and the community. The attitude that the corporate world should be responsible for adverse production effects has expanded into a broader conception of its responsibilities. It is now common to expect corporations not only to be accountable for their actions, but to contribute to solving the world’s......

Words: 5586 - Pages: 23

Premium Essay

Corporate Social Responsibility - Review Essay on Profiting Making and Csr

...that only people can have responsibilities, not business. Friedman stated that "the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits" only, he does not agree social responsibility is part of the responsibilities of Business, he stated that "Only people can have responsibilities" instead of a corporate, a business itself. "The corporate executive is an employee of the owners of the business, which generally will be to make as much money as possible while conforming to the basic rules of the society". In other words, the only reason to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is to maximize the profit of the business. "Only individuals who are to be responsible are businessmen, the owners of the business, has the direct responsibility to his employers and to conduct the business in accordance with their desires". So it comes to an individual can perceive responsibilities but not business itself. Business as a whole cannot be said to have responsibilities. While according to Freeman (2006) does not agree to Milton Friedman's argument that only social responsibility is to increase profit; in the moral sense, giving money doesn't make up at all in doing CSR. Freeman has reassigned a new interpretation of CSR. "A conceptual scheme that separates the social responsibilities of a corporate from its business responsibilities has long outlived its usefulness." To replace Corporate Social Responsibility, Company Stakeholder Responsibility has formed. He also......

Words: 353 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Corporate Social Responsibility

...Introduction Corporate social responsibility has taken on an increasingly prominent role in the business world in recent years. CSR has grown so popular that nearly every major company in the U.S. now integrates a significant commitment to social and/or environmental programs into its business model. CSR can be loosely defined as the adoption of socially beneficial and environmentally sustainable practices by corporate actors. The rise of CSR can be attributed to growing public disenchantment with traditional business practices that degrade the environment and compromise worker wellbeing, and resulting pressure from consumers and nonprofits on the private sector to reform itself. Instead of simply complying with government regulation, a company that is “socially responsible” adopts more stringent self-regulation ensuring that it is acting to minimize negative impact on the environment, its employees, its customers, and the community. The attitude that the corporate world should be responsible for adverse production effects has expanded into a broader conception of its responsibilities. It is now common to expect corporations not only to be accountable for their actions, but to contribute to solving the world’s problems. That is, corporations are now pressured to contribute to the creation of public goods like a healthy environment and poverty reduction as well as to absorb their own production externalities. Combined with the growing demand for “green” products, the......

Words: 5553 - Pages: 23

Premium Essay

Corporate Social Responsibilty

...What is Corporate Social Responsibility – Do We Need It? And Why? On 2011/05/20 · Leave a Comment In the next series of four articles I plan to explore the idea of “corporate social responsibility” (CSR). In the first one today, I shall discuss the shareholder view of CSR using Milton Friedman’s perspective as my main thesis. In the second article next week, I will explore the stakeholder view of CSR using Peter Drucker’s argument to initiate an alternate set of core ideas. In the third article, I shall take an important long detour to consider economic underdevelopment in the Middle East to highlight what happens to politics and society when the development of the corporation is impeded. In the fourth article, I reconsider the role of CSR in today’s world. The idea of CSR is to urge corporations to embrace not just the interests of shareholders, but also the interests of multiple stakeholders in the conduct of its activities. These stakeholders often include employees, suppliers, customers, and the local community in which the corporation conducts its business. CSR is a relatively new term although the idea that business has social and moral responsibilities beyond maximizing profit is much older. The term has only gained common currency since the late 1960s and the early 1970s, when the global reach of multinational corporations expanded as international trade and investment flows grew. Since then public debate over the role of business in society has been most vociferous......

Words: 2765 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Microeconomic Analysis

...Milton Friedman in his article “The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits” states that only people can have responsibilities, and that there is not such a thing like social responsibility of business. A corporation, according to Friedman, is an artificial person and, therefore, may have artificial responsibilities. The individuals who are responsible of the corporation are businessmen, which are individual proprietors or corporate executives. A corporate executive is employed by the owners of the business. And its responsibility is to conduct the business in a way that maximizes the profits while conforming to the basic rules of the society. A corporate executive, as any other person, may have many other responsibilities that he recognizes or assumes voluntarily, which can be referred as “social responsibilities.” These social responsibilities correspond to individuals, not to businesses. The main objective of corporate executives is to maximize the profits of all stockholders; therefore, they are to act in a way that is in the interest of those owners of the business. In this sense, a corporate executive shall not engage in social activities, unless they are done from an individualistic point of view instead of from a business point of view because, in the last case, he or she would be spending somebody else’s money, and not serving the interests of the employers. On the other hand, the situation of the individual proprietor differs because, if he......

Words: 1387 - Pages: 6