Applying material form item a , evaluate the strengths and limitations of using unstructured interviews to study racism in education .

The unstructured interview is like an informal conversation- the researcher usually has a list of topic areas, but no interview schedule is used. Instead, the interviewer asks open-ended questions. Many of the questions asked are often a felixible response to what the interviewees say.

Unstructured interviews are very useful for studying racism in education . This is because the interviewer can ask questions based on the response of the interviewee and, an item A days, can prove for reasons as to why people think and behave in the way that they do. Unstructured interviews can often result in unexpected findings.
Interpretivist sociologists are very keen on unstructured interviews because they believe that a valid data can only be obtained by getting close to people's experiences and the meanings behind them. By usiings unstructured interviews, the researcher can see the world through the eyes of the teachers, parents and pupils being studied and appreciate why they act the way they do . Verstehen is therefore achieved .

However , unstructured interviews do have limitations. They are very time consuming ,and can therefore be expensive depending upon the size of the sample. A big problem is that some people may not be able to tell the truth in an unstructured interview, because they are not aware that they bahave in certain ways. All interviews suffer from interviewer effect. This means that the interviewee may be negatively affected by the social staus of the interviewer, or because they are unsure whether the informative that they give will be used against them in some way. Racism is a very sensitive topic, and people therefore reluctant to admit to it . For example, teachers may framed losing their jobs, Ana's therefore