Free Essay

Socrates on the Equality of Women

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By rumelolo
Words 1314
Pages 6
Osarume West-Idahosa ( 1494075)
Professor Martin Black
Government 282
March 29, 2013 Critical Analysis In book V of Plato’s Republic Socrates defends the proposal that women should be eligible to serve as guardians in the city and should equally be entitled to receive equal training and education , necessary for the task, along sides men in the city. Socrates strongly believes that women are inherently capable of performing the same tasks as men, but accepts that they may be inferior in performing these tasks (455c). In his proposal, he states that since similar roles in the city require similar training and education whatever is good for the male should equally also good for the female. The distinction between virtues is non-existent as both sexes have the innate ability to function effectively in the society, when speaking in regards to knowledge and the different parts of the soul i.e ( reason, appetite, spirit). Here Socrates holds that individual should be judjed based on the virtue of their souls, and not mere physical appearance . a mans virtue is not brought about by his sex, virtue remains virtue regardless of a mans gender, socrates holds this postion due to this the best state must provide women the opportunity to govern. Socrates holds that role playing in this new just city should be equal in order for there to be unity and peaceful co-existence amongst the citizens. If a woman possesses the qualifications of being a guardian in the city, she must be educated in the same respect as other guardians, irrespective of her gender. Even though Socrates is fully aware that some or most women may lack physical strength he argues that biological and sexual differences are not nearly significant in running his proposed Utopian society ( ) as opposed to intellectual ability and moral strength. This is because only the most honest and wisest of rulers can hold the city’s best interest at heart. It is true that women and men differ in various aspects, and this is all as a result of the various social constructs present in different societies. However in Plato’s republic, it is apparent that women are presented as weaker but capable in that order. I personally do not think women are weaker, physical ability varies based on nature. But it is agreed that women are less in superior to men in physical strength . however I do agree with Socrates on the notion that both sexes should receive the same education based on guardian roles. I strongly in the notion of gender equality, and I do not support the idea that women should be treated less significant to men. Furthermore, Socrates draws attention to the community of women and children in his just city as book V progresses. This community as we know is clearly communal by nature. It is inevitable that there will be a certain degree of sexual relationships amongst the guardians and with this Socrates believes that such desires should be controlled .Essentially the main idea here is that the existence of marriage and family institutions is to be completely eliminated. This entails that all forms of love, marriage and sexual desire will be sacrificed and only utilized in a way that will benefit the city. Socrates is saying that all sexual relations between guardians and procreation of offspring will be strictly monitored by the state alone. In addition to this, sexual relations will only exists between the best of the female and male guardian citizens so that only the best of possible offspring may be produced. The proposed advantage of this system is that, it will reduce the burden on women for having to rear and take care of the children alone. This will also enable them to participate fully and effectively in the state without any form of interference. The children will be raised by nurses in the city, and will be trained to be rational , paying little or no attention to emotional desires. These children will also not be aware of who their actual parents are, in order not to defeat the purpose of the community. Socrates proposes that it is highly important the guardians take into consideration the city’s best interest at heart. With this new system of communism, he is almost certain that there will be no divided attention among the citizens, as opposed to having different family institutions. Hence The guardians must have their families in common for this reason, and in return great guardian offspring shall be raised . Socrates also establishes that he wants a sort of agape love relation amongst the citizens, in this way Guardians, Women, Children and other classes can view the other as one family. It is true that this will encourage kinship ties and even incest in some cases, but Socrates holds that it will be for the greatest good The aim of Socrates proposal is to essentially keep the city unified, He believes that with this system put into effectively use, there will be no dissension among the citizens (Guardians) and they will be able to focus more on that which is best for the city as a whole. I particularly disagree on Socrates’s position in this second argument. First and foremost, I believe that the family is the most important agent of socialization. It is also essential in the existence of humanity, In my own opinion Socrates is being insensitive and has completely disregarded the essence of the existence of family unit in the society. Also holding women and children in common specifically dehumanizes the women in particular, because as much as Plato attempts to rid the city of intimate and matrimonial unity , he is indirectly portraying women as sex tools, depriving them of the right to start a family of their own. This encourages the male guardians to utilize them whenever and however they please. I think this is very hypocritical on the path of Socrates, looking back to his earlier claim in the beginning of book V. Secondly the idea of selective breeding simply encourages infanticide. This clearly goes against the universal law, which forbids one to kill and the fundamental right to life. Socrates clearly states that any child born who does not meet the qualification of a guardian off spring should be done away with and left to die. This is inhumane and cruel in my opinion, and should never be encouraged in today’s world. Under no account should the life of one person be taken by another. Furthermore, I believe that the idea of communal living , defeats the purpose of posterity. Naturally human beings are selfish animals, who will sought to protect that which belongs to them. The “self” here is the number element of human nature , without private ownership , there is no room for competition and individuals have the tendency to aim in leaving a successful offspring behind. However with Socrates proposal, it is almost impossible for this to be achieve because the children in the city will lack the knowledge of who their real parents are and vice versa In conclusion, I strongly believe Socrates aims to create the best possible city , against all odds. This is understandable, but I do believe he is doing this in the wrong approach. I also do not think his proposal on the community of women and children is flexible in general. Social constructs have already been formed and it will take a significant amount of work to see that his ideas become conventional. Sex cannot be controlled by the state, because it a physical desire and which can only be suppressed by the part of the soul in constituting the appetite. Finally I believe that Marriage is sacred and has an intrinsic value in itself, hence should not be eliminated for the sake of justice.
Works Cited
Tom Griffith, Plato: The Republic, G.R.F Ferrari, ( Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000)

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Women's Political Equality with Men

...political equality with men. Atar Derj Critically evaluate Plato’s defense of women’s political equality with men. Women’s Political Equality with Men Women’s Political Equality with Men Plato’s defence of women’s political equality with men What is “Equality”? Equality is very hard to define since people disagree on its real meaning, as stated Dworkin: “People who praise it or disparage it disagree about what they are praising or disparaging” (2000, p. 2). So before going into the argumentation about women’s political equality with men, the term equality should be defined first to avoid any misconception. Equality means the correspondence between persons or circumstances which have the same qualities in at least one feature. However, equality is different from the term similarity that refers to the approximate correspondence. Thus, when they say men are equal, it doesn’t mean that they are identical or the same, but it rather mean that they are similar in some points. When a judgment of equality is made, it is more about the difference between the compared things. Whenever equality is implied in a topic, the question “equal in respect to what?” follows (Rae 1981, p.132 f.). Equality is often related to morality, and considered as a feature of justice in general. But how equality and......

Words: 1914 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay


...leader? Socrates in “The Republic” and Machiavelli in “The Prince” both discuss what it takes to make a good leader. One interesting topic discussed by them is the corruption of the people in charge and whether or not in affects the leadership role in a negative or positive way. Another determining factor in leadership skill is whether a woman would be a good leader and whether it matters that the image of a man in charge is what best for society or can women do just as much as men can based on their natural skills. Machiavelli speaks about how “Fortune is a woman” and men must take advantage before they get taken advantage of. One of the other components that make a good leader with good leadership skills is deception and whether to have it or not. Deception in leaders can either be helpful or hurtful to whomever is in charge. While Machiavelli has the perspective of a person being a leader that will do anything by any means necessary to stay in charge is how the Prince should run what he is in charge of. Socrates believes in doing what is right by the people. From what Socrates speaks about, he doesn’t feel like people should be corrupt in being a leader. Justice plays a big role in leadership in his opinion which is why he tries to find out from a few people what their definition of justice is and does a good job in trying to get them to understand why they are wrong although it’s frustrating to one of the people he was talking to about the topic of justice. Socrates......

Words: 1679 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay


...denies the basic morals and ethics of human rights. “Think not of life and children first, and justice afterward, but of justice first” (Document 2), is the message that was set out by the laws of democracy. These same laws are what failed Socrates in the end. He was a “victim, not of the laws, but of men” (Document 2). In the end, it was the laws set up by humans themselves that truly brought out the worst qualities in human nature. While philosophy focused on the rights of man, democracy focused on the rights to govern man. In order to create a form of government that benefited the people as well as morals and ethics, “a love of truth and hatred for falsehood that will not tolerate untruth in any form” (Document 3) was needed. According to Socrates, “there is nothing more closely akin to wisdom than truth. So the same nature cannot love wisdom and falsehood” (Document 3). The problem with democracy is that it denies truth in order to justify its means. Referring back to the example of Socrates, who was failed under the system of democracy, it is seen that although democracy justified his punishment because he was seen as treat to their democracy. Athenians under this system overlooked the basic human freedoms. In truth, although Socrates’ death was justifiable under democracy, he did nothing wrong morally or ethically by voicing his opinion to the young minds. Athenian democracy also had several weaknesses that led to Athena’s decline. In the view of Plato, the...

Words: 798 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay


...that, Socrates shows, are inadequate in exceptional situations, and thus lack the rigidity demanded of a definition. Yet he does not completely reject them for each expresses a common sense notion of justice which Socrates will incorporate into his discussion of the just regime in books II through V. At the end of Book I, Socrates agrees with Polemarchus that justice includes helping friends, but says the just man would never do harm to anybody. Thrasymachus believes that Socrates has done the men present an injustice by saying this and attacks his character and reputation in front of the group, partly because he suspects that Socrates himself does not even believe harming enemies is unjust. Thrasymachus gives his understanding of justice and injustice as "justice is what is advantageous to the stronger, while injustice is to one's own profit and advantage".[8] Socrates finds this definition unclear and begins to question Thrasymachus. Socrates then asks whether the ruler who makes a mistake by making a law that lessens their well-being, is still a ruler according to that definition. Thrasymachus agrees that no true ruler would make such an error. This agreement allows Socrates to undermine Thrasymachus' strict definition of justice by comparing rulers to people of various professions. Thrasymachus consents to Socrates' assertion that an artist is someone who does his job well, and is a knower of some art, which allows him to complete the job well. In so doing Socrates gets......

Words: 1839 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Ancient Greece for a set of rules that could use to apply to their areas of interest (page 108). In modern society, Socrates is mostly remembered for and credited with founding Western philosophy, but we have accounts of his influence in other fields. His original profession was as a stonemason (page 98), but his influence can be found in law and ethics with his influence on his pupil Plato (page 100), in art by describing the idealization process to the painter Parrhasius (page 111), and his cross examination and inductive reasoning techniques are the basis for the Scientific Method (page 98). Socrates influence can also be found indirectly in Greek drama, as he was the subject of the comedy The Clouds written by Aristophanes. Another person whose influence stretched over more than one field of study was Pythagoras. He is known as the father of pure mathematics and his major contribution is known to us as the Pythagorean Theorem (page 96). But his influence can also be felt is music because his study of ratios led him to understand that music is controlled by mathematical ratios (pages 96, 123). His views on proportion and symmetry not only influenced music, but also became the principles used in both architecture and sculpture (pages 96, 108). Ideals which are important and have helped to shape modern Western civilization are the Hellenic and Hellenistic ideals of equality, individuality, and choice. The first direct democracy was in ancient Athens (page 80). Individual......

Words: 595 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Socates V. Perpetua

...The Death of Socrates vs. The Death of Perpetua Civil disobedience has been a common element in human behavior. From the time of antiquity to the present, people lash out in various ways against standards that society has placed upon citizens. Two ancient examples of disobedient actions come from different ages revered for standards that hold today and provide a basis for modern law; the Greek and ancient Roman empires. From the Greeks, we have come to know the story of Socrates as memorialized by Plato, and the Roman age was the time of Perpetua, an early Christian woman. The fate of those individuals is the same – a death sentence handed down by the society they lived in. Although the conclusion of their respective lives is the same, the differences that lie in the reasoning of their death run deeper, with several key factors impacting their individual destiny. As we will see, these factors affect their relationship to the states and time periods they existed. Understanding the differences between Socrates and Perpetua rests in two major elements. The first one is the role of religion and understanding of deities. Their respective beliefs affected their relationship with the state that decided their deaths. Beginning with Socrates, we must first remember that Greek society was polytheistic. Standards such as monotheism in Catholic terms did not exist. There were Gods that ruled over emotions, the land, sea, and even realms outside of human reach, such as Zeus in heaven......

Words: 1787 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

The Guardians in Plato's Republic

...Just individuals : In his book ‘The Republic’, Plato searches for justice within the individual and what makes a person ‘just’. By comparing his sense of what is just at a political level and what is just at a psychological level he suggests three virtues of the individual which will make that particular person just. The virtues of wisdom, courage and moderation are common to both a just and the fictional just city of Kallipolis. This artificial city has the pre-determined virtue of being just – he does this in order to understand what justice is for the individual because Plato thinks that ‘a just man won’t differ at all from a just city in respect to the form of justice; rather he’ll be like the city.’ (Republic 435b) In the just city Plato creates three classes: the producers, the guardians and the rulers. Each of these three classes has a certain virtue it has to display to fulfill the ‘just city’ pre-requisite that Plato has placed upon Kallipolis. The rulers are required to exhibit wisdom so that ‘a whole city established according to nature would be wise because of the smallest class and part in it, namely the governing or ruling one. And to this class, belongs a share of the knowledge that alone among all the other kinds of knowledge is to be called wisdom.’ (428e-429a) The wisdom enjoyed by the rulers would be used to ensure that the city has ‘good judgement and [be] really wise.’ (428d) The guardians (soldiers) of Kallipolis would be educated in order to absorb...

Words: 6303 - Pages: 26

Premium Essay

Early Philosophers

... Title: Phaedo The Last Hours Of Socrates Author: Plato Translator: Benjamin Jowett Release Date: October 29, 2008 [EBook #1658] Last Updated: January 15, 2013 Language: English Character set encoding: ASCII *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK PHAEDO *** Produced by Sue Asscher, and David Widger PHAEDO By Plato Translated by Benjamin Jowett Contents INTRODUCTION.PHAEDO | INTRODUCTION. After an interval of some months or years, and at Phlius, a town of Peloponnesus, the tale of the last hours of Socrates is narrated to Echecrates and other Phliasians by Phaedo the 'beloved disciple.' The Dialogue necessarily takes the form of a narrative, because Socrates has to be described acting as well as speaking. The minutest particulars of the event are interesting to distant friends, and the narrator has an equal interest in them. During the voyage of the sacred ship to and from Delos, which has occupied thirty days, the execution of Socrates has been deferred. (Compare Xen. Mem.) The time has been passed by him in...

Words: 46205 - Pages: 185

Premium Essay

The Teachings of Socrates Successfully Shaped Ancient Greece Into an Advanced Civilisation. to What Extent Is This Statement Correct?

...The teachings of Socrates successfully shaped Ancient Greece into an advanced civilisation. To what extent is this statement correct? In 469BC, one of the most important philosophical influences in the Ancient Greek civilisation was born. Socrates’ teachings would continue to heavily impact on philosophical thought throughout the ages. Socrates began as a stonemason, but quickly made the change to a life pursuing the answers to all moral problems with emphasis on the right conduct by which one should live their life. His teachings attracted groups of young men who adopted his methodologies and became fascinated with the ideas he presented, which although popular with some, were often in conflict with the politicians in Athens at the time. Socrates lived through one of Athens’ most advanced eras and he saw firsthand the rise of the Athenian Empire. He often passed judgment and was highly opinionated on many issues which were putting Athens on the map, including democracy. He also promoted honesty and virtue as key contributors to a happy life. Socrates was one of only a few philosophers to be recognised for his work in his lifetime and this indicates that he must have been significant in some capacity. However, Athens was an ever-expanding empire, which meant that their culture was heavily impacted on by not just Greek people on the inside but also by the countries that they conquered and the foreigners who came to Athens as slaves or traders. These outside......

Words: 3388 - Pages: 14

Free Essay


...1. Peter Singer and Joseph DesJardins have some important discussion about decision-making. Even though they have different approaches in making decisions, both of their ideas focus on ethical choices. In Ivan Boesky’s Choice, Peter Singer mentioned ultimate choice and restricted choice. While restricted choices are made more often in daily life, ultimate choices are made when one is facing a decision that can benefit himself or can go against his ethical values. In my understanding, restricted choices are decisions that can be made without thinking critically or be done with some consideration. These choices are often made by a person’s interest. The decision, whether is good or bad, cannot affect the other’s interests. For example, a student chooses chemistry to study even though she doesn’t enjoy this subject. Although her decision might result in a lower grade in this course, it will not affect her classmates. On the other hand, ultimate choices are decisions that can affect not only a person’s interest, but also the others’. Unlike making restricted decisions, a person has to think critically and carefully before the ultimate decisions are made about the consequences. If a person respects his ethical values, it’s likely for him to make a good decision. If he decides to benefit himself, he might make a bad choice, and it might result in unpredicted consequences. For example, the same student who picked chemistry, and at this moment, she is having a really hard time.......

Words: 1026 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Evaluate the Role of Education in Society. Consider Issue of Gender in Your Response. Also, Consider How Such Factors May Impact on a Person’s Life Chances.

...will prepare them physically, mentally and socially for their life chances (Clark 2005). Educational institutions play a very important role in reducing social inequalities. Over the last century British schools experienced very important changes and moved from a selective system to a comprehensive one in the 1960s and 70s. Much research has shown that the move from a selective to a comprehensive system in the UK had a positive effect in reducing gender and social inequality (Leicester et al 2000; Ianneli and Paterson 2005). Gender has been viewed as one of the most important influence on educational attainment in the UK and other parts of the world. Across European and British schools there has been a much greater awareness of gender equality...

Words: 3359 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Freedom Of Speech Essay

...ideologies. (Smith, D., & Torres, L. (2006)) An important figure in the establishment of the right to freedom of speech was Socrates. In 399 BC he said, 'If you offered to let me off this time on condition I am not any longer to speak my mind... I should say to you, "Men of Athens, I shall obey the Gods rather than you."' (Kraut, R. 2015) Socrates spoke these words after he was prosecuted for speaking out about his religious and political ideals. Even though freedom of speech was a right held very dearly by his fellow Athenians, the moment they felt insecure the right was set aside. Many other intellectual figures, including Protagoras, Anaxagoras, Amon, Daspasia and Diagoras, were either prosecuted or exiled because they expressed so called dangerous ideas. It is not known for sure whether these public figures were actually prosecuted for their opinion or that they spoke about their harassment in a more exaggerated manner in order to wear it as a badge of honor. The only trial in which someone was definitely prosecuted for the overt act of preaching ideas was the trial of Socrates. He was tried for not acknowledging the gods of the city. The majority voted for conviction, but there were also some who voted against it. This was mostly due to the fact that they valued the right to freedom of speech as a part of their political system more than any harm. In the end Socrates was sentenced to death by drinking a poisonous liquid. (Kraut, R. 2015) As time progressed many other......

Words: 3812 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Argument Paper

...States becoming a more democratic country. Traditional people think that a man should get married with a woman but should not get married with a man. Homosexual love is different from straight love. Because homosexual is different, people consider it a mental illness. Actually, homosexual love is a normal phenomenon. It has been proved that homosexual love is not mental illness. A gay’s gene distinguishes them from normal people’s gene and homosexual love is also related to gays’ growth environment (Whitley, 2011). At least five percent of people in this world are gay. How can people define that these five percent of people are abnormal and they have mental illness? Reviewing the long history, a lot of grand people are gay. For example, Socrates is homosexual. He was one of the greatest founders of Western Philosophy and he was also famous of...

Words: 1064 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

His/145 Fifties and Sixties

...Running head: CIVIL RIGHTS IN THE SIXTIES 1 Civil Rights in the sixties Michael Crawford HIS/145 December 1, 2011 Amy Linimon Civil Rights in the sixties Civil Rights Movement: An Introduction America was a country borne out of a group of people's desire for Freedom from oppression, under the Lockean belief of human equality. Despite this however, discrimination & racism coloured American history. Indeed, it wasn't until the early part of the 20th century when the American Legal System formally recognized African Americans as 'citizens'. In America then, how are minorities seen? Remember that America was born out of the former New England Colonies that were once under the British. Therefore, America is predominantly made up of Anglo-Europeans who can trace their roots back to Europe & the Colonial Period. In the 1950's, any group that are not equally represented & enjoying the same rights & privileges under the protection of the American constitution or could but due to ethnicity & other factors are discriminated against is considered a minority. Women since the birth of the nation have struggled for gender equality, hence back then they were also considered a 'minority'. Even in the There were of course the African-Americans who were big players in the Civil Rights movement. The American Indians are also considered minorities although they were not as politically visible as pushing for the civil rights movement as the feminists & the African Americans (Rosa Parks, Martin......

Words: 2334 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay


...In Conjunction with  History of Ethics Instructor: Robert Cavalier Teaching Professor Robert Cavalier received his BA from New York University and a Ph.D. in Philosophy from Duquesne University. In 1987 he joined the staff at Carnegie Mellon's Center for Design of Educational Computing (CDEC), where he became Executive Director in 1991. While at CDEC, he was also co-principal in the 1989 EDUCOM award winner for Best Humanities Software (published in 1996 by Routledge as A Right to Die? The Dax Cowart Case). He also coauthored the CD-ROM The Issue of Abortion in America (Rountledge, 1998) Dr. Cavalier was Director of CMU's Center for the Advancement of Applied Ethics and Political Philosophy from 2005-2007. He currently directs the Center's Digital Media Lab which houses Project PICOLA (Public Informed Citizen Online Assembly), and is also co-Director of Southwestern Pennsylvania Program for Deliberative Democracy. Co-Editor of Ethics in the History of Western Philosophy (St. Martin's/Macmillan, England, 1990), Editor of The Impact of the Internet on Our Moral Lives (SUNY, 2003) and other works in ethics as well as articles in educational computing, Dr. Cavalier is internationally recognized for his work in education and interactive multimedia. He was President of the "International Association for Computing and Philosophy" (2001 - 2004) and Chair of the APA Committee on Philosophy and Computers (2000-2003). Dr. Cavalier has given numerous addresses and...

Words: 14800 - Pages: 60