Helen has autonomy Rights which can or can’t be threatened with her informed moral/immoral actions. Morally Helen has the duty to be truthful to her Professor and University by rejecting the copy of the final exam from her friend. Helen can earn respect from her professor and University by informing about her friend stealing the paper from the professor’s mailbox; Privacy Right. Eventually Helen can earn the respect of her friend by keeping the final paper and not disclosing to professor about her friend’s stealing of paper; Property right. Helen can also promise to her friend that she will not disclose the stealing of paper by her friend to anyone; Promise right.
It should be a fair competition between Helen and other students of her class. It’s unfair for other students who don’t have access to the final exam. If the other students get a chance of having a final paper before the Final, then everyone will have an equal chance to be considered a fair game else it will be an inequality towards other students. There will be a lack of justice if stealing of paper by Helen’s friend goes unnoticed. Helen will earn lot of respect from professor by showing virtue; truthfulness and rejecting the final paper from her friend. Being Truthful and honest, Helen will win lot of applause from professor and on the other side the professor or University will take appropriate actions to punish Helen’s friend for stealing the paper from mailbox. This will do proper justice to Helen for being honest and truthful and also indirectly to other students of the class. To Helen, there will be no point of receiving nice treatment from her friend. Though, her friend stole the final exam only to help sensitive Helen. Her friend deserved the respect of Helen and she also deserved a promise from Helen of keeping secret about the truth. Helen could convince her in keeping the final exam. She