Free Essay

Strategic Management

In: Business and Management

Submitted By leeya
Words 4610
Pages 19

Ibrahim El-Husseini Jake Leslie Melville Sean Wheeler Satyajeet Thakur

Anchoring Success Effective Management of Energy Companies’ Shipping Interests

Contact Information Beirut Georges Chehade Partner +961-1-985-655 Ibrahim El-Husseini Partner +961-1-985-655 Fadi Majdalani Partner +961-1-985-655 Dallas Andrew Clyde Partner +1-214-746-6566 Dubai Dr. Ulrich Kögler Partner +971-4-390-0260 Eric Dahl Senior Executive Advisor +971-4-390-0260 Sean Wheeler Principal +971-4-390-0260 Satyajeet Thakur Senior Associate +971-4-390-0260 Kuala Lumpur Edward Clayton Principal +603-2095-2088 London Viren Doshi Senior Partner +44-20-7393-3572 Jake Leslie Melville Partner +44-20-7393-3425 São Paulo Arthur Ramos Partner +55-11-5501-6229

Vivek Joshi, Kenneth Kanara, Tamer Obied, Sophie Outram, Anil Pandey, Abdul Rahman Saleh, and Sonal Singh also contributed to this Perspective.

Booz & Company


For decades, major energy companies have been at the forefront of the global shipping of hydrocarbons. Producers have played an instrumental role in the development of all aspects of the business, including the design of the ships and the establishment of standards that ensure high-quality operational, safety, and environmental performance. However, shipping has often taken a subordinate role and even been viewed as a cost center as energy companies pursue broader goals, such as access to market, HSEQ (health, safety, environment, and quality) performance, and national industry development. As a result, energy company shipping assets have largely underperformed in commercial terms, and this has generally been accepted as a price worth paying by energy companies.
But pursuit of performance in an energy company’s shipping businesses is consistent with its broader priorities. Indeed, given the shipping business’s capital-intensive and volatile nature— and the consequent implications of underperformance—energy companies need to recognize that improving the commercial performance of shipping assets is a strategic imperative. Poor management of shipping interests can tie up hundreds of millions of dollars of capital unproductively. In time, energy companies may abandon or scale back their legitimate interests in shipping if the business proves to be a black hole, and divert management talent, focus, and capital to competing priorities. A systematic approach to strategy, operations, measurement, and organization can position energy companies to reap major benefits from their shipping assets, ensuring efficiency, profits, and synergy with broader strategic goals.

Booz & Company


KEY HIGHLIGHTS • Most major energy companies maintain in-house shipping capacity, though the scope of their commitment varies. • The shipping divisions of energy companies often do poorly in terms of commercial performance; the shipping divisions of international oil companies (IOCs) and national oil companies (NOCs) have comparatively low returns on capital. • It is imperative to expect high standards of commercial performance from shipping interests. Not holding such high standards is not only value destroying; it can compromise energy companies’ primary strategic reasons for maintaining shipping capacity.


ship, and the biggest supertankers can carry more than 3 million barrels of oil in a single load. Throughout this evolution, energy companies have stayed the course and have been instrumental in the development of the shipping industry. Historically, major energy companies owned and operated at least some portion of their own tanker fleets, as a result of their interest in controlling the supply chains of their core product. As the shipping industry evolved, numerous independent shipping companies entered the market alongside incumbent energy companies, offering a viable alternative to energy companies’ practice of owning and operating shipping assets. This maturity in shipping led to the natural commoditization not only of crude and refined product tanker shipping, but also of other trades, such as LNG shipping, that were once considered specialized.

The shipping industry has evolved in step with the development of the oil industry, ever since the use of wooden barrels for oil transportation in the 1850s and the Nobel brothers’ creation of early models of the singlehull oil tanker in the late 1870s. The size of tankers has grown markedly since the middle of the 20th century: Today’s double-hull tankers and liquefied natural gas (LNG) ships are built for scale to transport large quantities of hydrocarbons from production sites to markets worldwide. Roughly 2 billion barrels of oil are transported annually by


Booz & Company


Energy companies are still committed to maintaining shipping capacity, although the degree of their involvement varies (see Exhibit 1). Energy company rationales for involvement in the ownership and management of shipping assets are typically linked to some combination of the five factors below: 1. Strategic coverage: Maintaining control over shipping capacity is a significant consideration, especially

for NOCs in geopolitically unstable regions. Access to markets ensures business continuity and sustenance during periods of emergency. 2. Volume commitments: Because NOCs typically have a higher percentage of CIF deliveries than FOB deliveries, they have a greater volume commitment and baseload shipping capacity requirement.

Exhibit 1 A Representative Sampling of Energy Companies’ Transport Capacity

DEADWEIGHT TONS (IN THOUSANDS) 10,000 9,000 8,000 7,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 3,000 2,000 1,000 0 NOC 1 NOC 2 IOC 1 NOC 3 NOC 4 IOC 2 IOC 3 NOC 5 LPG Chemical Product Crude

Note: Excludes LNG fleets. Source: Clarkson Shipping online data, June 2009; Booz & Company analysis

Booz & Company


3. National industry development: Shipping presents some producer corporations with an opportunity to expand and diversify their countries’ domestic economies, and provides an avenue to create local employment and develop local skills.

4. HSEQ considerations: For IOCs that face strict regional regulations and public pressure in addition to international regulations, control over shipping provides a greater ability to manage risks by adhering to health, safety, security, and environmental rules that protect the primary hydrocarbon business.

5. Technological leadership: IOCs that are involved in highly specialized technological trades, such as LNG shipping a decade ago, can use control of shipping to position themselves less as commodity suppliers and more as end-to-end solutions providers.

Exhibit 2 Strategic Considerations Will Vary by Company


Relative Importance to NOC / IOC Low High National Oil Company (NOC) International Oil Company (IOC) Low High



Source: Booz & Company


Booz & Company

There are no definite prescriptions for how energy companies should rank these five strategic considerations (see Exhibit 2). In fact, energy companies should develop their own priorities depending on their unique circumstances. As a result, setting industrywide benchmarks for fleet size and operating models holds little value; each company will have different goals.

A more nuanced observation from our experience, and one that is much more problematic, is that some strategic considerations are explicitly recognized, whereas others are not. For example, many NOCs recognize that strategic coverage, or access to markets, is a vital consideration (see Exhibit 3). However, other key considerations—such as national

industry development—either are not formally recognized or are so vaguely alluded to that they are not meaningful in terms of shipping strategy development. As a consequence, there is often confusion throughout the organization regarding the true goals of shipping and how to evaluate its subsequent performance.

Exhibit 3 Energy Companies Maintain Varying Levels of Strategic Coverage

RELATIVE FLEET SIZES (REPRESENTED IN TOTAL DAYS OF DAILY PRODUCTION) 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 NOC 4 NOC 1 NOC 3 IOC 1 NOC 2 IOC 2 IOC 3 NOC 5 Fleet Size Ratio = Total Shipping Capacity (Barrels) Total Daily Crude Production (Barrels)

Source: Clarkson Shipping online data, June 2009; International Energy Agency crude production figures; Booz & Company analysis

Booz & Company



The shipping divisions of energy companies often do poorly in terms of commercial performance: Booz & Company analysis reveals that the shipping divisions of IOCs and NOCs have comparatively low returns on capital. This is primarily because management often views shipping as a cost center. The shipping company is relegated to an operational support area with limited autonomy in decision making. The lack of emphasis on commercial results also provides little incentive to innovate or improve efficiency from within. Many key decisions (ship acquisition and sales, shipping revenues, ship utilization, ship availability, head office costs, and ship management approach among them) are made with only limited consideration of their impact on shipping returns—all such concerns are largely

subordinated to the real and perceived needs of the parent corporation. Unfortunately, this approach does not take into consideration the fact that the shipping industry’s financial dynamics can be unforgiving to halfhearted participants. There are two major sources of value creation (or destruction) in any shipping operation: assets and freight. Both can be extremely volatile, and the impact of incorrect decisions, or even just the wrong timing, can be very material. For example, the cost of a new very large crude carrier (VLCC) at the market peak would have been in the region of US$170 million. In June 2009, it would have been between $100 million and $120 million (see Exhibit 4). Freight markets can also move radically. The average time char-

Exhibit 4 The Cost of Tankers Varies Widely

160 140 120 100 80 60 2006



2009 June

80 70 60 50 40 30 2006

Refined Products Ship Prices1 (in US$ millions) 23% 42%



2009 June


Using Aframax as a proxy Source: Clarkson Shipping online data, June 2009; Booz & Company analysis


Booz & Company

ter rates for much of 2008 hovered above $80,000 per day; the rate has since dropped to $30,000 per day (see Exhibit 5). The consequence of being locked in at the wrong end of these deals is starkly obvious. As seen in the examples of VLCC costs or the fluctuation of freight rates, the stakes are high, and the threat of value destruction very real. As a result, it is not an option but rather an imperative to focus on maxi-

mizing performance in the shipping arena. In doing so, energy company management must address and dispel three main concerns and misconceptions involving the shipping business. Concern 1: The pursuit of commercial performance diverts management from its core purpose of supporting the strategic aspirations of the parent company. This need not be the case. Any beliefs to the contrary arise from executives’

taking the strategic considerations of their company not as directional aspirations but as firm mandates. The former approach lays out the boundary conditions that the shipping division must meet, while giving the division flexibility in how to meet them. The latter approach, lacking in adaptability, would not be responsive to fast-moving markets, whether in oil or shipping. Internal energy company criteria can rarely be defined so minutely as to dictate inflexible com-

Exhibit 5 Shipping Players Must Be Alert to Volatile Freight Rates

VLCC/ULCC Spot and Time Charter Rates1 (US$ thousands/day) 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 Oct 07 Nov Dec 07 07 Jan 08 Feb 08 Mar 08 Apr 08 May June July Aug Sept Oct 08 08 08 08 08 08 Nov Dec 08 08

Crude Spot Crude Time Charter Chemical Spot

Crude Spot Comparison Across Ship Types (US$ thousands/day) 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 Oct 07

VLCC Spot Suzemax Charter Aframax Spot Panamax Spot

Nov Dec 07 07

Jan 08

Feb 08

Mar 08

Apr 08

May June July Aug Sept Oct 08 08 08 08 08 08

Nov Dec 08 08

Based on 310,000 DWT D/H modern tanker. Rate quoted for a 300,000 DWT vessel until 12 Sep 2008. Source: Clarkson Shipping online data; Booz & Company analysis

Booz & Company


mercial decisions by the shipping divisions. There is a significant element of subjectivity in all general decisions, enough to warrant a large degree of strategic flexibility for shipping divisions, and through it the pursuit of commercially viable performance. Concern 2: Energy companies cannot do a good job of commercially managing their shipping interests. Contrary to popular belief, energy companies should have an easier task and do a better job of managing their commercial performance than would an independent shipping company. The reason for this is the relative abundance of capital within the parent energy company, which affords the best-managed oil divisions the privilege of taking a much more strategic view on market trends and having the financial muscle to make bold, valueenhancing decisions; independent shipping companies, by contrast, may have their hands tied owing to capital constraints. For example, not many shipping companies currently have the resources to buy assets at today’s

depressed prices. However, an energy company with a long-term strategic interest in building its shipping fleet might find the next few years an ideal time to do so for commercial sustainability in the long run. Two key components affect the profitability of shipping interests of energy companies. The first is capital decisions, including the timing of acquisitions and sales, decisions related to buying new or used vessels, and the selection of shipyards. The second is revenue; making sound freight market decisions and maximizing vessel availability will ensure that companies realize the full revenue potential of their shipping assets. It is important to note that the biggest sources of value creation or destruction in shipping are minimally related—if not unrelated—to actual vessel operations and consequent HSEQ risks. Commercial performance can be easily achieved without any increase to the risk or compromise to the reputation of the parent energy company.

Concern 3: The pursuit of commercial performance does not contribute to the achievement of energy companies’ primary strategic goal. The pursuit of commercial performance can be complementary to the achievement of the strategic goal on several fronts. For example, commercially well-managed shipping divisions are highly regarded by the parent company and find it easier to get support for initiatives that fit with the parent company’s strategic goals. In addition, an energy company with shipping assets that consistently perform well in the market will feel little pressure to abandon its legitimate strategic interests in shipping—which might be the case if the parent company views shipping as a black hole in terms of its capital. Finally, a well-managed shipping operation finds it easier to attract the brightest talent from the industry and from the parent company, increasing the likelihood that its success will be sustainable.

Energy companies should have an easier task and do a better job of managing shipping interests’ commercial performance than would a third-party company.


Booz & Company


Management can operate shipping divisions efficiently and contribute to the parent company’s strategic goals by taking a systematic approach to addressing challenges in four major areas—strategy, operations, measurement, and organization. Analytic and Dynamic Strategy In most cases, energy companies’ shipping divisions need to revisit their strategies to ensure overall coherence. The first step involves determining the explicit strategic considerations of the shipping division, which will also include institutionalizing implicit strategic considerations. Once the organization has defined its overall strategy, it should prioritize

the timing, setting parameters for what needs to be accomplished and when. Finally, once these strategic goals are clearly defined and set, it is imperative that they be articulated in the mission, vision, and values statements of the organization. This will ensure a common understanding throughout both the parent company and subsidiaries. A hypothetical example of an NOC seeking to establish its strategic coverage requirements during an emergency illustrates how important it is to define and institutionalize strategic goals. An energy producer seeking to ensure it can deliver an ample supply of oil during a crisis would begin by answering three questions: What are the planned export volumes during emergencies?

Booz & Company


What volumes would be handled by third-party shippers? What is the existing emergency shipping strategy? The first question identifies the volume of crude that the NOC would need to export to sustain critical public service obligations, such as defense, public infrastructure, public transportation, health care, and nutrition. The second question calculates

the volume that the NOC could offload to others. The last question requires the NOC to determine the number of ships that would be needed to carry the remaining volume not covered by third parties. The NOC would pinpoint the size and type of vessel it would need and the minimum voyage duration it would require to transport its volumes outside the emergency zone.

To further extend that example, consider a company that requires 3 million barrels of oil a day to satisfy its planned volume of exports and can use third-party shippers to handle volume of 1 million barrels a day. If that NOC had a 12-day round-trip plan (including a buffer to get its shipments out of harm’s way), a strategic analysis would reveal that it needs approximately 12 VLCCs to continue to operate (see Exhibit 6).

Exhibit 6 An Example of Analytic Strategy Setting


• Depends on volumes that are planned to be exported during emergencies, e.g., 100% or less of normal export volumes • Can differ across hydrocarbon categories • Planning assumptions need to be made on the availability of third-party ships during emergencies • Alternative export routes, e.g., pipelines, should be subtracted from volume calculation • The size of ships must be taken into account

3 million barrels / day


1 million barrels / day


• The duration of standard emergency round-trip voyage must be taken into account

12-day round trip (including 4-day buffer for emergency delays)

Approx 12 VLCCs

Source: Booz & Company


Booz & Company

Once a base fleet strategy is set, it is critical to keep this strategy dynamic, recognizing that the operating environment is not static but evolves continually. Just as energy companies adapt their hydrocarbon strategies to changing market environments, so should their shipping subsidiaries.

For example, in a tense geopolitical climate experiencing full-scale active conflict, commercial considerations can be abandoned entirely. At the other end of the spectrum, if the geopolitical situation is not dire, the shipping subsidiary of an energy company can seek to reap shipping

profits and maximize asset returns (see Exhibit 7). Clear and Efficient Operating Model There are two overarching objectives for shipping operating model clarity

Exhibit 7 Managing Trade-offs Between Commercial Expectations and Strategic Objectives

Geopolitical Situation and Resulting Coverage Needs

Worst Case

No-go Area—Profitability expectations to be progressively de-prioritized as geopolitical situation deteriorates (as an example)

Status Quo Potential range for prioritizing commercial performance in different scenarios

Best Case Low High Expectation of Shipping Arm to Deliver Commercial Performance

Source: Booz & Company

Booz & Company


and efficiency. The first objective is to put the goals of the enterprise, or parent company, first; a shipping subsidiary always is aimed at driving the results of the parent company, not of itself (i.e., “enterprise first” behavior). The second objective involves a fair recognition of the performance of the business, the

transparency of costs, and returns on shipping assets. These twin objectives manifest themselves in several operational areas, such as the commercial arrangements between the parent company and the shipping arm for the use of shipping assets, decisions on the operational and office footprint of the shipping division and their

associated cost implications, and the overall ship management approach. The objectives of enterprise-first behavior and fair market value can be addressed to determine commercial arrangements between the parent company and its shipping arm for the use of assets (see Exhibit 8).

Exhibit 8 An Example of a Framework to Guide the Commercial Relationship Between the Parent Company and the Shipping Subsidiary

Encourages the Right Behaviors


Spot Price Basis

Time Charter


Cost Plus Basis



Reflects True Shipping Costs/ Returns to Parent Company

Source: Booz & Company


Booz & Company

In this illustrative situation, compensating a shipping division for its costs incurred plus a fixed margin (cost plus) for hypothetical revenues would meet the objective of providing transparency in shipping costs and returns, but would fail in the encouragement of enterprise-first behaviors, as the shipping division

has limited incentive to manage its costs or revenues. Similarly, compensating a shipping division for the prevailing spot price for vessel fixtures would encourage the right behaviors all around, but would not give a transparent assessment of shipping costs and

returns, as it ignores the fact that the parent company has already made the shipping investments and locked in capacity, and spot price fixtures could therefore be an inaccurate simulation of true shipping returns. In this particular example, a time charter based on prevailing market

Enterprise-first behavior and an accurate reflection of asset costs and returns should be the guiding principles of the relationship between the parent company and its shipping arm.

Booz & Company


prices or a relationship on similar terms between the parent company and the shipping arm could both encourage right behaviors and give a fair reflection of shipping returns. The shipping unit would be encouraged to simulate responsible management because its payments are market linked. And this arrangement recognizes the fact that the asset commitments have already been made, and thus effectively simulates shipping returns for the parent company. Accurate and Effective Metrics Performance management is critical, but it is often used by organizations

as a mere reporting tool. In fact, a performance management system that is closely aligned with a company’s strategy provides leadership with the right level of detail and insight into the organization to manage its performance actively and efficiently. In turn, this drives the right balance of strategic and tactical behaviors across the organization. Performance management, however, can be a daunting task. A number of key principles can help management guide the business. 1. Break down the strategy into measurable components—such as coverage, HSEQ, cost, revenue,

employees, social responsibility, and customer satisfaction. 2. Identify performance indicators for each component that will provide senior management with the most appropriate level of detail to determine whether the organization is achieving its strategic and commercial goals. Indicators should link to measurable targets that are assignable to a responsible individual. 3. Ensure that these indicators form the basis of conversations between the leadership of the shipping division and the parent, and between the management and leadership of the shipping division. The fre-

Performance management is critical, but it is often used by organizations as a mere reporting tool.


Booz & Company

quency of discussions will ensure that leaders on both sides (parent and subsidiary) have the ability to intervene and mitigate any critical problems, if necessary. 4. Tie the indicators to individual performance appraisals and rewards, strengthening effective consequence management. Building Blocks of the Organization The final challenge for management concerns building an organization that will achieve high performance—fusing together five discrete capabilities: Organizational structure. The right structure will drive accountability and transparency throughout the organization. From a structure perspective, a

clear delineation between corporate, operational, and support activities is particularly paramount. Process efficiency. Clearly mapped processes and clarity on decision rights for individuals and groups (e.g., committees) help smooth interfaces and increase organizational efficiency. The most critical decision-making process in this business involves the use of capital—timing the purchase or sale of ships and deciding whether to invest in new or used ships, for example. The speed and efficiency of this process is key to the long-term commercial sustainability of the shipping business. Human capabilities. Having the right quantity and quality of people, with a focus on employee development, is a key component of organizational sustainability. Energy company ship-

ping units need to focus on hiring, empowering, and retaining senior and middle management to ensure that they have the right mix of strategic and operational expertise. Technology. Having appropriate fit-for-purpose technology platforms to aid the execution of the business improves organizational flexibility and responsiveness. Companies need to determine where they really need automation and focus their investments in discrete areas. Key interfaces. The shipping company should be organized in a way that provides clarity on the relationships with important constituents of the parent company, particularly those in supply and trading functions as well as special project coordinators and corporate strategic planning departments.

Booz & Company



For too long, shipping divisions have not played a central role in the corporate strategy of many IOCs and NOCs. Top commercial performance in the shipping divisions of energy majors is not an option; it is an imperative that can be achieved. Energy producers need to realize that shipping operations can enhance strategic goals. Furthermore, with a systematic approach to managing

performance, energy companies can nurture top-quartile performance from their shipping operations while reaping the benefits for the parent corporation. Continuing to regard these operations as a corollary business is likely to result in a huge missed opportunity that can prove to be severely detrimental in the long run in terms of strategy, finance, and impact on people.


Booz & Company

About the Authors Ibrahim El-Husseini is a partner with Booz & Company in Beirut. He leads the energy practice in the Middle East, and has more than a decade of experience in advising regional oil, chemical, and other energy companies on strategic transformation. Jake Leslie Melville is a partner with Booz & Company in London. He specializes in strategy and organization structure for national and international energy companies in Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. Sean Wheeler is a principal with Booz & Company in Dubai. He specializes in performance management for major energy corporations in the Middle East and Europe. Satyajeet Thakur is a senior associate with Booz & Company in Dubai. He specializes in strategy and operational performance for energy and maritime industry clients, and has several years of deep operational experience in the maritime industry.

Booz & Company


The most recent list of our offices and affilates, with addresses and telephone numbers, can be found on our website,

Worldwide Offices Asia Beijing Delhi Hong Kong Mumbai Seoul Shanghai Taipei Tokyo Australia, New Zealand & Southeast Asia Adelaide Auckland Bangkok Brisbane Canberra Jakarta Kuala Lumpur Melbourne Sydney Europe Amsterdam Berlin Copenhagen Dublin Düsseldorf Frankfurt Helsinki Istanbul London Madrid Milan Moscow Munich Oslo Paris Rome Stockholm Stuttgart Vienna Warsaw Zurich Middle East Abu Dhabi Beirut Cairo Dubai Riyadh North America Atlanta Chicago Cleveland Dallas Detroit Florham Park Houston Los Angeles McLean Mexico City New York City Parsippany San Francisco South America Buenos Aires Rio de Janeiro Santiago São Paulo

Booz & Company is a leading global management consulting firm, helping the world’s top businesses, governments, and organizations. Our founder, Edwin Booz, defined the profession when he established the first management consulting firm in 1914. Today, with more than 3,300 people in 60 offices around the world, we bring foresight and knowledge, deep functional expertise, and a practical approach to building capabilities and delivering real impact. We work closely with our clients to create and deliver essential advantage. For our management magazine strategy+business, visit Visit to learn more about Booz & Company.

©2010 Booz & Company Inc.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Strategic Management

...1.0 WHAT ARE THE ELEMENTS OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT? Strategic management consists of the analyses, decisions and actions an organization undertakes in order to create and sustain competitive advantages. The strategic management process is made up of four elements: situation analysis, strategy formulation, strategy implementation, and strategy evaluation. These elements are steps that are performed, in order, when developing a new strategic management plan. Situation Analysis The situation analysis provides the information necessary to create a company mission statement. Situation analysis involves "scanning and evaluating the organizational context, the external environment, and the organizational environment" (Coulter, 2005). This analysis can be performed using several techniques. Observation and communication are two very effective methods. To begin this process, organizations should observe the internal company environment. This includes employee interaction with other employees, employee interaction with management, manager interaction with other managers, and management interaction with shareholders. In addition, discussions, interviews, and surveys can be used to analyse the internal environment. Organizations also need to analyse the external environment. This would include customers, suppliers, creditors, and competitors. Several questions can be asked which may help analyse the external environment. It examines the company’s relationship with its customers and...

Words: 2003 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Strategic Management

...Strategy is a diverse term that is differently perceived by different people. However, here we are concerned with its meaning in relation to the higher management of organizations. Strategy may be defined as the direction and scope of an organisation over the long term, which achieve advantage in a changing environment its configuration of resources and competences as to fulfil the expectations of the stakeholders. For any plan to be successful, it is crucial to use the tool of effective management. Strategic management would be the right term to use here. Under the phenomenon of strategic management, organizations try to procure benefits by amalgamating realistic plans and meaningful actions. Strategic management is a phenomenon that can be classified into three elements. These are strategic position, strategic choices, and strategy implementation. Strategic position is central to the strategic management according to which any business entity must evaluate its position in relation to macro and micro environment. Macro environment includes the political, economic, social, technological, legal, and ecological factors. Obviously, a business organization cannot be immune to all these factors. A continuous change in the intensity of these factors means that their impact on the business will keep changing. Decisions are, therefore, should be taken by keeping in view these factors. Factors of micro environment also need consideration for assessing the capability of your......

Words: 922 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness

...Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness Michael A. Clinton Professor Gerald R. Turner Business Administration Capstone- BUS 499 Jul 19, 2012 Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC) is currently one of the fastest growing companies here in the Charleston, SC area for the past few years. SAIC is a FORTUNE 500® scientific, engineering and technology applications company that uses its deep domain knowledge to solve problems of vital importance to the nation and the world, in national security, energy and the environment, critical infrastructure, and health. The Company's approximately 41,000 employees serve customers in the U.S. Department of Defense, the intelligence community, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, other U.S. Government civil agencies and selected commercial markets. Headquartered in McLean, Va., SAIC had annual revenues of approximately $10.6 billion for its fiscal year ended January 31, 2012. (About SAIC 2012) SAIC is rank number 5 on the Top 100 government contractors list of Washington Technology; with $4.1 billion in government contracts revenue and $1.4 billion in civilian contracts revenue and approximately 41,000 employees worldwide. SAIC is the principal defense contractor for Joint Intelligence Operations Capability-Iraq (JIOC-I), a capability that provides military forces with access to critical intelligence while......

Words: 1693 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Strategic Management

...Strategic Managemen Essay Subject :s Strategic Management Topic : Is Business Strategy A Mixture Of Luck And Judgement, Opportunities And Design, Or More Of An Art Than A Science? Abstract Firms or companies today face a broad array of risks, problems and issues internal to them and external factors relative to increased international competition due to globalisation. Thus, strategic management is an activity necessary to be undertaken by firms who want to sustain their existence in today’s highly competitive environment. Firms need to develop strategies as they are managements’ game plan for growing the business, staking out a market position, attracting and pleasing customers, competing successfully, conducting operations, and achieving targeted objectives. Strategic management is the set of managerial decisions and actions that determines the longrun performance of a firm. The question however arises as to whether strategic management is an art or a science or that it is simply a mixture of luck and good judgement. Introduction Firms or companies today face a broad array of risks, problems and issues, be they strategic, operational, financial, customer, vendor, competitor, to name a few. Moreover, concerns about increased international competition brought about by the rapid globalisation phenomenon abound not only in the US but also in Europe with the further expansion of the European Union and in Asia and Latin America due to increased economic integration in......

Words: 3152 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Strategic Management

...Strategic Management & Business Policy, 13e (Wheelen/Hunger) Chapter 1 Basic Concepts in Strategic Management 1) Strategic management is one decision that determines the short-term performance of a corporation. Answer: FALSE Diff: 1 Page Ref: 5 Topic: The Study of Strategic Management 2) In the externally oriented planning phase, plans are developed by heavily involving the input of managers from lower levels. Answer: FALSE Diff: 2 Page Ref: 5 Topic: The Study of Strategic Management 3) General Electric led the transition from strategic planning to strategic management during the 1980s. Answer: TRUE Diff: 1 Page Ref: 6 Topic: The Study of Strategic Management 4) One of the benefits of strategic management is a clearer sense of vision for the firm. Answer: TRUE Diff: 2 Page Ref: 6 Topic: The Study of Strategic Management 5) To be effective, strategic management must be a formal process. Answer: FALSE Diff: 3 Page Ref: 7 Topic: The Study of Strategic Management 6) Globalization is the internationalization of markets and corporations. Answer: TRUE Diff: 1 Page Ref: 8 Topic: Globalization and Environmental Sustainability: Challenges to Strategic Management 7) As more industries become global, strategic management is becoming less important in positioning a company for long-term competitive advantage. Answer: FALSE Diff: 2 Page Ref: 8 Topic: Globalization and Environmental Sustainability: Challenges to Strategic......

Words: 5592 - Pages: 23

Premium Essay

Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness

...Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness Name Professor BUS 499 Business Administration- Capstone Strayer University- Maitland Campus April 13, 2014 Abstract The purpose of the paper is to research and understand how the changes of globalization and technology have impacted the Airline industry. This paper will also apply the industrial organization model and the resource-based model to determine how the Airline industry earn above-average returns. This paper will explain how the Airline industry’s success is through its mission and vision statements with Southwest Airlines as an example. Finally, this paper will evaluate how the importance each category of the stakeholder impacts are to the overall success of the Airline industry. Globalization and Technology In today’s business industry, the globalization process has become an important aspect and fundamental force. The elements that contribute to globalization is the environment, culture, regulation and technology and production. While the advancements globalization has increased greatly, so has the advancements in airline industry with their aircraft (Shevell, 1999). Globalization also provides a great amount of potential profits to nations and their corporations (Button, 2008). Air transportation has evolved into a major industry (Kroo, 1999). The airline industry’s continuously grows and is facilitated through its international......

Words: 1359 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Strategic Management

...SYSTEMS APPROACH TO STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Amanda J. Gregory Centre for Systems Studies, Business School, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull, HU6 7RX, United Kingdom, ABSTRACT Strategic management involves decision-making about an organization's objectives together with the formulation and implementation of plans, particularly regarding the allocation of resources, to support their achievement. As such, strategic management is a dynamic and complex process involving consideration of internal and external factors, and the short and long term. The effectiveness of an organization’s strategic management can critically impact upon its viability and there are many reasons why the stategic management process may fail. Such reasons include failure to:  think creatively about the likely affects of plans  obtain external/internal participation and commitment  co-ordinate and control resources. In this paper it is argued that many of the reasons for failure may be attributed to the successive dominance of different reductionist approaches to strategic management. From a systems perspective it may be argued that such approaches represent partial approaches to strategic management that neglect the complex, embedded and dynamic nature of modern organizations. Accordingly, the reasons why strategic plans fail are taken to provide a framework for the evaluation of the potential contribution of a range of systems methodologies to the strategic management......

Words: 3830 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness

...Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness Paul Warren Strayer University BUS 499 Dr. Hase November 2, 2014 Assess how globalization and technology changes have impacted the corporation you researched What is Globalization? How does it affect a company? What does it do for a country? What are some major benefits of going global? Who are the recipients of these benefits, if there are any? Let’s get started by answering the first question. “Globalization is the increasing economic interdependence among countries and their organizations as reflected in the flow of goods and services, financial capital, and knowledge across country borders” (Hitt, Ireland, Hoskisson, pg. 9. 2013). Starbucks, an American company headquartered in Seattle, Washington is one of the most global companies I know of with more than 20,000 stores in over 50 countries around the world. I have had the opportunity to enjoy the taste of home in at least 5 different countries, which are almost the same as home but more geared to the host country tastes. As you can see, going global allowed for expansion into different markets around the world, which in return lead to countries who supply products to reach those markets as well. For instance, Starbucks by coffee from places such as Africa, Latin America and Asia by doing so this creates jobs in those areas and increases export of goods. These are major benefits from all parties involved. Coffee drinker benefit the most as they...

Words: 1258 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness

...Assignment 1: Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness BUS 499- Business Administration Capstone Professor Clayton Sinclair III April 17, 2015 Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness The company that I researched was The Clorox Company. The company was founded in 1913 and is a part of the household and personal care industry. According to (Forbes List, 2014), they are listed as number 98 on The Forbes list for the most innovative company and number 94 for the world’s most powerful company. They employ 8,400 employees and bring in a total sales of $5.65 billion. Clorox cleaning products consist of Tilex, 409, Pine-Sol, SOS, Clorox bleach, Formula 409, and Green Works. Their household products consist of Glad, Kingsford, Ever Fresh and Scoop Away. Their lifestyle products consist of Brita, Burt’s Bees, Hidden Valley and KC Masterpiece (The Clorox Company , 2014). Assess how globalization and technology changes have impacted the corporation you researched. The Clorox Company manufactures products in more than two dozen countries and markets them in more than 100 countries. Clorox products are available over 100 countries touching households and businesses in almost every region. They have consistently achieved competitive success while others failed to do so. Clorox Company international brands include: Agua Jane, American Heritage, Arco Iris, Arela, Astra, Bluebell, Bon Bril, Brimax, Clorinda, Emperatriz, Gumption, Handy Andy, La Negrita,......

Words: 1942 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Strategic Management & Strategic Competitiveness

... Latrice Smith BUS 499 Week 2 Assignment 1: Strategic Management & Strategic Competitiveness Dr. Machuca 7/13/2014 Globalization is a concept that can be positive as well as negative as it refers to companies around the world and the effects it has on the global economy. Globalization can be referred to as a global movement that is integrating economic, financial, trade, and communications. Globalization will continue to be a force around the world because the global economy is continuing to be more dependent on each other. Even though globalization has been going on for centuries, there has been a new wave of policy and technological developments that have increased relations between trade and investment, and has led to a newer phase of global economic development ("What is globalization | Globalization101", n.d.). A positive outlook on globalization is the fact that there has been a reduction in the prices of goods and services throughout the world. It is reported that the volume of world trade has increased by 20 times, and the foreign investment between 1997 and 1999 has doubled from $468 billion to $827 billion ("What is globalization | Globalization101", n.d.). The negative aspect of globalization can be seen as a downfall for some companies that have not been keeping up with the demands of globalization and contributing to the some economies that are not the most stable because of unemployment and companies closing. Some can also argue that......

Words: 1527 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Strategic Management

...INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC MANAGENT 1.0 Introduction This chapter introduces the concept of strategic management and provides an overview of strategic management. This chapter is divided into six sections. The first section explains the evolution of the strategic management concept. This is followed by the second section on definition of strategic management. The third section describes the context in which strategic management takes place. This is followed by the fourth section which covers the scope of strategic management. The fifth section shows some of the benefits of strategic management for organizations. Finally the sixth section describes the process of strategic management. Upon the completion of this chapter you should be able to: 1. understand the concept of strategic management 2. know the brief history of the strategic management concept 3. understand the definition of strategic management 4. know the context in which strategic management occurs 5. comprehend the scope of strategic management 6. describe the benefit of strategic management 7. know the strategic management process 1.1 Introduction to the Strategic Management Concept Strategic management is a concept that originated from the military field. The concept of strategic management was first applied in ancient battles. The period around 500 B.C. saw numerous battles that took place Greece and China. The early written record on strategic management can be traced back during this......

Words: 4525 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Strategic Management

... Sample Assignment Assignment front sheet Qualification | Unit number and title | Pearson BTEC Level 7 Diploma in Strategic Management and Leadership (QCF) | Unit 1 Developing Strategic Management and Leadership Skills | Student name | Assessor name | | | Date issued | Completion date | Submitted on | | | | | | Assignment title | Strategic Management and Leadership Report (1 of 1) | ------------------------------------------------- LO | Learning Outcome | AC | In this assessment you will have the opportunity to present evidence that shows you are able to: | Task no. | Evidence(Page no) | 1 | Understand the relationship between strategic management and leadership | 1.1 | Explain the link between strategic management and leadership | 1 | | | | 1.2 | Analyse the impact of management and leadership styles on strategic decisions | 1 | | | | 1.3 | Evaluate how leadership styles can be adapted to different situations | 1 | | 2 | Be able to apply management and leadership theory to support organisational direction | 2.1 | Review the impact that selected theories of management and leadership have on organisational strategy | 1 | | | | 2.2 | Create a leadership strategy that supports organisational direction | 2 | | 3 | Be able to assess leadership requirements | 3.1 | Use appropriate methods to review current leadership requirements | 3 | | | | 3.2 | Plan for the development of future situations requiring leadership | 3 | | 4 | Be able to......

Words: 857 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness

...Assignment 1: Strategic Management and Strategic Competitiveness Student’s name: Professor’s name: Course title: BUS 499 (Business Admin and Capstone) Date: Introduction When we talk about the largest coffeehouse company, the first thing that comes to your mind is Starbucks. Starbucks Corporation was launched in 1971, it corporation is based in Seattle, Washington and has more than 16,000 outlets all over the world. Starbucks always believe that serving the best coffee is there aim, there coffee beans are grown under highest quality standards and sourced using ethical practices. Starbucks s not only limited to selling coffee but also sells verity of products, viz. coffee (more than 30 blends and single origin premium coffees), handcrafted beverages (Frappuccino, smoothies, Tazo tea, fresh brewed coffee), Merchandise (coffee and tea brewing equipment, mugs and accessories, packaged goods, music, books and gifts), Fresh Food (Baked pastries, sandwiches, salads, oatmeal, yogurt parfaits and fruit cups) and Consumer Products (coffee and tea, ready to drink products and ice-creams). They also carry other brands under their trademark Starbucks Coffee, Seattle’s Best Coffee, Tazo Tea, Evolution Fresh, La Boulange and Torrefazione Italia Coffee (Starbucks, 2012). Impact of Globalization and Technology The corporation I researched was Starbucks. Starbucks is a worldwide corporation that operates in around 62 countries around the world. Just like every other corporation......

Words: 1942 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Strategic Management

...1 Definition of Strategic Management Strategic management is the process where managers establish an organization’s long-term direction, set the specific performance objectives, develop strategies to achieve these objectives in the light of all the relevant internal and external circumstances, and undertake to execute the chosen action plans. Strategic management steps: • specifying an organization’s objectives, • developing policies and plans to achieve these objectives, • allocating resources to implement the policies Therefore, we can see that strategic management is a combination of strategy formulation and strategy implementation. It is the highest level of managerial activity, usually performed by an organization’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and executive team. Strategic management provides overall direction to the enterprise. Strategy formulation involves: • doing a situation analysis: both internal and external; both microenvironmental and macro-environmental. • concurrent with this assessment, objectives are set. This involves crafting vision statements (long term view of a possible future), mission statements (the role that the organization gives itself in society), overall corporate objectives (both financial and strategic), strategic business unit objectives (both financial and strategic), and tactical objectives. • these objectives should, in the light of the situation analysis, suggest a strategic plan. The plan provides the details......

Words: 1457 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay


...FACULTY OF BUSINESS MANAGEMENT MGT 790 STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT Course Outline 2011 Course Prescription Strategic Management is the process and practice of managerial decision making and implementation that seeks to create and maintain competitive advantage. In essence it determines the long term performance of a business and as such is the role of the senior executive members to refine but the responsibility of all to roll out. Included in the process is comprehensive environmental scanning, strategy formulation (strategic planning), strategy implementation, and monitoring. Students in this course will review how the strategic decision makers within an organisation first identify, define and analyse commercial problems and then develop practical and ethical solutions. It provides a practical guide for, and an initial experience in, strategy formulation and strategic management. Class time will be largely spent in lecture, discussion, case studies and experiential exercises. Students will learn from the theoretical literature, instructor, case studies, videos, research presentations, and from each other. The course materials explain and describe the different aspects, challenges, and stages of strategic management simply and clearly. Goals of the Course To examine and understand the nature and role of strategy, strategic management and strategic leadership within an organization. Learning Outcomes 1. To develop skills in strategic analysis,......

Words: 1985 - Pages: 8