Assessment Criteria - Task 2 - Written Assignment

Course Title: | | Module Title: | | Level: | | Assessment Title: | | Weighted: | | Assessmentcriteria | Below 40% | 40% - 49% | 50% - 59% | 60% - 69% | 70% and over | Relevance and scope of subject material. | A significant amount of the subject material lacks relevance to the question set and/or an answer with too narrow a focus. | A satisfactory answer to the question, although lacks full coverage of all areas. | Answers the question explicitly and provides a reasonable knowledge of the topic. | Answers the question well and makes good use of information sources and course materials | An excellent answer with comprehensive coverage of relevant areas with evidence of additional research and reading | Definition of relevant concepts and principles | Lacks definition/explanation of relevant concepts and principles | Has basic definitions | Detailed definition of some relevant concepts and principles. | Detailed definition of all major concepts and principles | Thorough explanations of all relevant concepts and principles. | Theoretical analysis | Descriptive coverage of issues, not all of which are relevant to the task set. Little or no attempt at evaluation. Few or no theoretical frameworks discussed. | Satisfactory standard of theoretical analysis. Includes some relevant theoretical frameworks. Evaluation is limited. | A good standard of analysis and evaluation of most issues. A broad knowledge of theoretical frameworks and concepts. Provides a cohesive case. | A very good standard of analysis and evaluation of relevant issues. A broad and deep knowledge of theoretical frameworks and concepts. Provides a well-argued and cohesive case. | An excellent standard of analysis and evaluation. A broad and deep knowledge of relevant theoretical frameworks and concepts. Provides a rigorously argued and