Synopsis of Tort Cases

In: Business and Management

Submitted By ssunnydayz4u
Words 1929
Pages 8
Synopsis of Tort Cases
Team C will analyze the synopsis of four scenarios. The team will identify tort actions, potential plaintiffs, potential defendants, and which elements of the tort claim constitutes the plaintiffs claim. Team C will also identify any defenses the defendant may use in each scenario. Each synopsis is evaluated on how the claim will be resolved with team C stating legal reasons for the resolution.
Football Game Scenario
A potential lawsuit is torts of past and future medical expenses, pain and suffering, and mental distress from the plaintiff quarterback whose arm was broken. The defendant in this case is the opposing player. The defense here will be there was no breach of duty or evidence of intentional assault. This case may be dismissed because football contracts will state the possibility of various injuries for football players.
Malik a plaintiff against the stadium was injured when the railing could not support his weight. Daniel is a potential defendant for pushing Malik resulting in assault and battery. The defense in this situation is the random act of getting pushed made the railing support more wait than it normally bears. This case could result in damages paid to Malik by the stadium and by Daniel.
Ruben, a minor, had beer unintentionally poured on him is a plaintiff against Malik for mental distress. Ruben may also seek damages for future medical expenses, pain and suffering, and mental distress against the concession worker for giving him a regular drink. The tort of negligence is evident with Ruben as the potential plaintiff, and the concession worker as the potential defendant. “To be successful in a negligence lawsuit, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, the defendant breached this duty of care, the plaintiff suffered injury, and the defendant’s negligent act…...

Similar Documents

Tort Law

...The tort law case I have selected is Federal Aviation Administration et al v. Cooper. This case (No. 10-1024) was brought before the United States court of appeals by writ of certiorari and argued on November 30, 2011. Justice Alito delivered his decision on March 28, 2012. The facts of the case are as follows: The respondent (Cooper) was a licensed pilot who worked for the FAA. Cooper was diagnosed with human immunodeffiency virus (HIV) which would have prevented him from receiving the necessary medical certificates necessary to operate aircraft under FAA regulations at the time. He intentionally withheld that information from the agency on several occasions in order to receive continued renewals of his medical license certificates under FAA regulations. During this time Cooper applied and received long-term disability benefits from the Social Security Administration (SSA). In an attempt to identify medically unfit individuals who were obtaining FAA certifications, the Department of Transportation (DOT) provided the SSA with a list of names of licensed pilots to cross reference with their database in order to identify individuals who were receiving disability benefits while concurrently holding FAA flight certifications. Respondents name was discovered and subsequently his license was revoked and he was indicted for making false statements to a Government agency. Mr. Cooper was fined and sentenced to probation. Later on he filed suit against the Government...

Words: 637 - Pages: 3

Tort

...Tort of Negligence A tort can be defined as civil wrong which is not a breach of contract i.e. committed against an individual, it is apparent from this definition that there is a distinction between contract and tort. A tortious liability is not undertaken voluntarily by the courts leaving the defendant or/party no option but to accept. A tort doesn’t arise as a result of a bargain but as a consequence of committing a tort. Contractual liability is usually strict but that arising out of a tort is always ALMOST based on fault. The tort of negligence by far is the most important tort as its widely defined and can be committed in the multitude of ways, compared to other torts that apply in more limited circumstances. In order to establish a tort of negligence the plaintiff must establish three things on a balance of probabilities: - *The defendant owed a duty of care *Defendant breached the duty of care *There was damage or injury *No defenses An important distinction that we need to make is for vicarious liability where the employer is vicariously liable for the negligence of the employee, if the employer was negligent during the course of his employment. Duty of Care – the court will ask two questions to determine liability i.e. proximity and foreseeability, the landmark case that supports this was Donoghue v Stevenson [1932]. The case surrounded where the claimant had a decomposed snail in her ginger beer, which caused her to suffer gastroenteritis, and site of...

Words: 629 - Pages: 3

Negligent Tort

...Negligent Tort Jacqulyné Allmon BUS 670: Legal Environment Instructor: Timory Naples June 24, 2013 Negligent torts are deemed unintentional which is one of the most common types of torts business managers experience and one of the most expensive. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) is charged with protecting the public from unreasonable risks of injury or death associated with the use of the thousands of consumer products under the agency's jurisdiction. Deaths, injuries, and property damage from consumer product incidents cost the nation more than $900 billion annually. In this essay a product will identified that has been subject to recall by using the Consumer Product Safety Division website www.cpsc.gov, determine whether if the product had not been recalled and had caused harm to a consumer, the manufacturer would be liable in negligence, and identify and discuss a relevant consumer protection statute identified under “Consumer Protection” in conjunction with the product recall was previously identified. Jeep Liberty Strollers were recalled on June 19, 2013 under recall number 13-221. Kolcraft, the manufacturer, and CPSC have received 39 reports of inner tube ruptures causing the wheel rim to fracture and fly off as a projectile. “Of these, 18 included reports of injury, with 14 occurring while filling the tire with air by an adult caregiver. Two children received lacerations to their chin or leg while standing near the stroller and 16 adults received...

Words: 1398 - Pages: 6

Tort

... expected to get a consumable drink for her purchase and instead got third degree burns. In addition, McDonald’s admitted to knowing about previous burn cases and chose not to make any changes to try protecting their consumers. Under normal circumstances one would expect to be warned of a known danger so one could handle the beverage accordingly. In addition, the defense tried to trivialize the number by comparing the number of cups of coffee sold with the number of customers who were burned. What happened after the verdict? The judge reduced the amounts the jury awarded from $200,000 to $160,000 and from $2,700,000 to $640,000. The plaintiff and the defendant then settled confidentially after the trial, rather than go through an appeal process. Beverages that are hot enough to burn are now packaged to reduce the chance of spillage more than they were in 1994 and more automobiles have beverage holders, as well (Fleisher-Black, 2004). McDonald’s reduced its hot coffee temperature 20 degrees (Schostok, 2000). Who was hurt? Who was helped? How to prevent it? Future plaintiffs in liability cases may have been hurt by this case. Jurors are supposed to take an objective look at the facts involved in the cases being presented to them. The average person does not know the facts behind this case, as was evident by the responses of a majority of the students in the week 6 class conference topic #1. Therefore, the average juror would probably enter the courtroom with the...

Words: 1528 - Pages: 7

Tort Law

...MATERIALS WEEK 1 The dotted line between ‘fault liability’ and ‘strict liability’: four ideal types of liability in tort law 1. Are the notions of fault and strict liability misleading? • two notions should be considered as they will be applied all along the four types of liability: - fault (as in fault liability) ( liability for one’s own faults. - risk (or strict liability) ( accountability, based on criteria other than individual fault, for the consequences resulting from an unlawful/illegal act. Four ideal types • a) Individual liability for one’s own faults ▪ the basis for this type of liability lies in the conduct of the person held liable. ( this deserves the qualification ‘fault liability’. ▪ article 6:162 BW is the legal basis for the duty to pay damages where the conduct of a person is qualified as wrongful. • b) Individual liability without blameworthiness ▪ accountability is required. ( elements of fault, as wrongful conduct provides the foundation but also elements of strict liability, since there may be no grounds for apportioning blame. ▪ article 6:162 BW as well as article 6:165 BW may provide some legal basis. • c) Liability for damage caused by others (vicarious liability) ▪ this is a form of strict liability, insofar as there is strict responsibility for the fault of others. ▪ Articles 6:169, 6:170, 6:171 and 6:172 BW provide some legal...

Words: 986 - Pages: 4

Tort Paper

...In this scenario several instances occurred to where one could file a suit. Intentional tort, Lee who is a customer of Buy-Mart begins shooting innocent shoppers with a rifle he is planning to purchase. One of Lee’s victims is a lady walking along with her husband in the next aisle over. As she falls to the ground her husband has a heart attack. A boy is also injured by a metal beam from the bullet ricochets but was unintentional; this is considered as an unintentional tort. Then the tort of outrage is also noticed in this scenario because once Buy-Mart’s security guard begins kicking Lee’s ribs while he was unconscious. The plaintiffs in this scenario are the lady who was shot by Lee and her husband who had the heart attach, but if her husband died his wife could bring a wrongful death suit to recover the damages suffered from both Lee and Buy-Mart. For the reason that, her husband gets a heart attack from witnessing his wife being shot from Lee while he was purchasing the rifle. The lady could also file a suit for Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress because she saw her husband die which causes her distress as well as battery from being hit by Lee’s bullet. The parents of the boy who got injured could also file a suit for negligence on Buy-Mart because one of the store’s employees working on behalf of Buy-Mart acted negligently for setting a box of bullets on top of the counter during Lee’s transaction. Lee could also file an assault and battery suit towards Buy-Mart...

Words: 544 - Pages: 3

Tort

... astronomical and incalculable. Secondly, contract was the means by which economic loss is to be compensated and the courts are unwilling to interfere with this. Nevertheless, Mark should be advised that he might also try recovering losses arising from the damaged bread and the profit for the damaged bread. This is probably recoverable as the damage is the kind that is foreseeable. Thus, it is highly likely that Mark will be able to recover his losses except for pure economic loss. In conclusion, it is highly possible that negligence can be established on the part of Justin and Jason. However, because of the doctrine of vicarious liability, Mark is also able to sue Chigley Services which is vicariously liable. In practice, normally only the employer is sued but it is still possible for Mark to pursue his claims from both. As for the fire brigade, it is unlikely that a duty of care is owed, thus negligence will not be established. Lastly, although pure economic loss is not recoverable, he can still bring a claim against Justin and Jason and Chigley Services for other economic losses he suffered. Bibliography Books Elliott C & Quinn F, Tort Law (8th edn Pearson, Gosport 2011) Deakin S, Johnston A & Markesinis B, Markesinis And Deakin’s Tort Law (7th edn OUP, Hampshire 2013) Hepple and Matthews’, Tort Cases and Materials (6th edn OUP, New York 2009) Articles Vranken M, ‘Duty to Rescue in Civil Law and Common Law’ (1998) 47 Int'l & Comp. L.Q.......

Words: 4446 - Pages: 18

Tort Case

...Case Facts Geraldine Cruze was struck by large pieces of the ceiling in her apartment. She then rushed to the Jacobi Hospital Emergency Room reporting abdominal pain. After seven hours, the hospital released Cruze. She returned home and rested. However, the hospital failed to detect that Cruze had suffered four broken ribs, a lacerated renal vein and other internal injuries. Despite the pain and difficulty of breathing, Cruze herself did not notice these serious internal injuries, and she believed that she was recovering. Cruze was in fact bleeding internally. Over the next three days, she bled to death. Cruze’s attorney sued the hospital for medical malpractice and the landlord for negligence. From The Hospital’s Perspective The potential liability for the hospital is the neglect of the plaintiff’s internal injuries. The hospital is required to act the degree of care, skill and judgment, which reasonable doctors in the same practice area would exercise in the same or similar circumstances. A failure to conform to this standard is negligence. In this case, the hospital should have the ability to discover the internal injuries of the plaintiff. The plaintiff’s attorney would possibly bring this medical malpractice against the hospital, and argue that it finally caused the death of the plaintiff. Among the four elements of negligence, owe a duty of care and injury to another are two elements showed very obvious in this case. It would be very difficult for the hospital to...

Words: 555 - Pages: 3

Tort Essay

...TORTS ESSAY 1 Art and Bill were leaving work one afternoon when they were approached by Charlie, who was wearing a mask and carrying a gun. Charlie, who suspected Art of having an affair with Charlie’s wife, approached to within ten feet of Art and Bill, aimed the gun at Art and said, AArt, I am going to kill you.@ Art quickly grabbed Bill and pulled Bill in front of him, using Bill as a shield. Charlie fired the gun; the bullet going over the shoulder of Bill and hitting Art in the arm. Charlie then dropped the gun onto the ground and turned to run away. Art, using his uninjured arm, picked up the gun and shot at Charlie as he ran away, hitting him in the leg. Bill was horrified at the prospect of almost being shot, and although he suffered no physical injuries, incurred $5,000 for psychological counseling. Discuss the intentional tort claims, if any, that can be raised in the following lawsuits, and what defenses, if any, that can be asserted: 1. 2. 3. 4. Art v. Charlie. Bill v. Charlie. Bill v. Art Charlie v. Art. MODEL ANSWER FOR TORTS ESSAY 1 I. Art v. Charlie A. Assault. An assault is a volitional act by the defendant which intentionally causes the plaintiff to suffer an apprehension of an immediate harmful or offensive contact. 1. Volitional act. An act is volitional if the defendant voluntarily commits it. Here, Charlie clearly acted volitionally when he aimed the gun at Art and threatened to kill him. 2. Intent. The intent required...

Words: 1182 - Pages: 5

Tort and Cyber Tort

...TORTS AND CYBER TORTS CHAPTER 12 Section 1: The Basis of Tort Law * A Tort law is designed to compensate those who have suffered a loss or injury due to another person’s wrongful act. It is meant to obtain compensation (monetary damages) or other remedies for the harm suffered. * The purpose of Tort Law: Tort law tries to protect certain things that society recognizes as an interest worth protecting such as property, intangible interests (personal privacy, family relations, reputation, and dignity) * Types of Damages available in Tort Actions: 1. Compensatory Damages – meant to compensate a plaintiff for actual losses such as special damages (compensation by quantifiable monetary losses) or general damages (compensation by nonmonetary aspects of harm suffered, such as pain and suffering). 2. Punitive Damages – Meant to punish the wrongdoers who have committed a reprehensible or egregious act so as to deter others from similar wrongdoing. This can include gross negligence and intentional tort actions Section 2: INTENTIONAL TORTS AGAINST PERSONS * In tort law, intent means only that the actor intended the consequences of his or her act or knew with substantial certainty that specific consequences would result from the act * Assault and Battery: Assault is any intentional and unexcused threat of immediate harmful or offensive contact, including words or acts that create in another person a reasonable apprehension of harmful contact...

Words: 749 - Pages: 3

Tort Law Case

...Tort Law Case I. The fireman car accident The fireman’s car was driving at a very high speed. This excess of speed was ordered by his supervisor. The car ahead, under the pressure of the fireman’s car had become agitated and by trying to make room for the fire engine, collided with a lamp post. The driver of this car had no security belt. We have to see if the fireman is liable. To be liable, three things are needed : a damage, a fact, a causation between them. According to the principle of tort law, article 1:101 of European Principle of Tort Law, (the strict liability) as soon as the victim proved that he suffers a damage, it’s needed to have compensation. Is there a damage ? Peter has collided and had to be took to the emergency. Based on article 2:102 (2) of European Principle of Tort Law, a bodily integrity enjoys the most extensive protection. If no serious hurt had been seen, we can assume that it exists a little traumatism or maybe a light physical damage and therefore this is a bodily damage. A damage exists, so the victim, Peter, doesn’t have to prove a fault, according to the strict liability principle. We need to identify the fact. By driving too fast, with the flashing lights, with the bell sounding, the fireman put a pressure on Peter who panicked and by trying to make room for the fireman, he collided with a lamp post. Are the fact and the damage in relation ? To identify the factual causes, we utilize the...

Words: 2588 - Pages: 11

Underwear Tort Case

...Unreasonably Dangerous Underwear Dangerous product? A large guy (280-90 pounds) ironically won a one-week trip to Hawaii as a reward for selling more than $20,000 in diet products. But in a lawsuit against Hanes, the underwear maker, he alleged his “dream trip” went awry due to allegedly defective briefs which “gaped open and acted like a sand belt on my privates,” causing injury. We’ll let the court elaborate on this interesting products liability case: Plaintiff testified that by the second day in Hawaii he was in debilitating pain. However, … he ignored the pain until he returned to Pensacola two weeks later. He explained he was able to ignore the pain because he was enjoying himself so much on this long anticipated vacation that he did not dwell on or focus on the pain to any degree. Plaintiff testified he believed sand that he picked up in his swim trunks while enjoying the Hawaiian surf had irritated his penis. Over the next few days he and his wife “walked all over the place” until his condition worsened to the point that he “could hardly walk.” Plaintiff testified his inability to walk was caused by defendant’s defective manufacturing of his underwear which caused his “fly” to gap open. The gap resulted in his penis protruding from his underwear, whereupon the edges of the opening abraded his penis like “sandpaper belts.” … Under cross examination plaintiff admitted he never examined his penis to assess the problem and/or treat the problem. He testified he is...

Words: 587 - Pages: 3

Tort

...Paula has owned property in a relatively undeveloped area near the top of Black Mountain for many years. Six years ago, Telephone Company erected a cell phone transmission tower on Black Mountain not far from Paula’s property. Four years ago, Paula built a cabin on her property and began to spend most of her free time there engaging in bird watching and other outdoor activities. Last year, Telephone Company leased space on the tower for an emergency alert siren and agreed to install the siren and to test it regularly. The site was chosen because it allows the siren’s warning to carry farther than from any other site. Telephone Company promptly installed the siren. Since its installation, it has tested the siren for a five-minute period weekly. The resulting sound is so loud as to cause Paula to stop whatever she is doing and cover her ears. It also greatly reduces the local bird population. Two months ago, Paula sent a letter to Telephone Company outlining the effects of the siren and demanding that it cease its activities. Telephone Company has not responded to Paula’s demand. Does Paula have any claim against Telephone Company? Discuss Does Paula have a claim against Telephone Company? Trespass to Land 20 An intrusion onto the land of another. Paula will have to establish the Telephone Company (D) intentionally intruded upon or caused a thing to intrude upon her land, causation and damages. Act The D must have performed a volitional act. Here, Paula will...

Words: 628 - Pages: 3

Tort

... agency did not take action when it received the neighbor’s warning that Deirdre had begun to take drugs again, because it has a policy to respond only to reports of actual neglect or abuse. That policy may well derive from the agency’s scarce resources. If the policy had no rational basis, the court might yet intervene to review it, but if it is based on a consideration of economic and social factors, the courts of most states would hold the agency immune from liability. Decisions about the al location of limited sums of tax dollars are the very stuff of government, and their wisdom cannot be challenged in a tort action. For example, in Riss v. New York (N.Y. 1968), it was held that the New York Police Department was immune from liability for failing to respond to a telephone call describing a threat of violence to the plaintiff. The police department had not assumed a duty to the plaintiff by giving her the reasonable impression that it would respond to her call for help. Similarly, the agency in the present case has not taken any steps that would suggest to Paul that it would intervene for his safety the moment it received any indication of a relapse on his mother’s part. The agency’s nonfeasance had a policy basis and so should probably not attract liability. II. State agency vs. Third Party defendants 1. Joint and several liability So far, the only action to have been brought on Paul’s behalf is against the State family services agency. The state in...

Words: 1492 - Pages: 6

Tort Law

... instructor. By not consulting the teachers before taking the students, Johnny has in effect performed an authorized act in an unauthorized manner. Therefore as the employer of Johnny who committed a tortious wrong in the course of his employment, Autumn Bay High is vicariously liable for his actions. PART 2 ‘The Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) places sensible limits on the duty of care’ Critically discuss this statement in relation to the fact scenario in Part One and at least one of the theoretical readings you have considered in this course. The implementation of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) has had a major and widespread effect in restricting the expansion of the tort of negligence by placing some sensible and some debatable limitations on the duty of care. Part 3 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 represents a significant narrowing of the scope of the common law action for pure mental harm. One of the ways in which the Act curtails the duty of care, is by limiting the number of people to whom a duty of care is owed in situations of pure mental harm. In Tame v New South Wales; Annetts v Australian Stations Pty Ltd the notion of geographical and temporal proximity was rejected by the High Court due to its irrationality and arbitrariness. However the Act now stipulates that in cases where psychiatric injury is sustained as a result of death, injury or peril to someone other than the plaintiff, as well as having to prove a recognisable psychiatric......

Words: 3481 - Pages: 14