Free Essay

Syrian Civil War

In: Historical Events

Submitted By sutterhome
Words 1687
Pages 7
Peoples views are divided on the Syrian conflict between those who view it as a revolution, and those who view it as a civil war. Revolution inevitably holds characteristics of civil conflict, there is a aspect of civil conflict that must not be looked at in all revolutions. There is a horrible truth about the Syrian problem which is overwhelming, that there are Syrians fighting and killing other Syrians in Syria.

The civil conflict taking place in Syria is not a purely sectarian one. The western media exaggerates the extent to which the conflict can be so described. An arrogant Orientalist set of views refuses to understand the Syrians have a much different life. It revolves around death and pain. Sectarian war is the inevitable the destiny of Syrians.

Not every conflict is about discrimination or for religious reason. The Spanish Civil War was a conflict between the supporters of the Republic and the fascist followers of Franco.

The situation in Syria is closer to the previous example than sectarian civil war. One of the biggest reason behind civil conflict in Syria is the uprising of Syrians against a new feudal class that had enslaved them in syria. For rxample, the majority of Muslim Sunni rebels are moved by a will towards social justice and revenge against these feudalists, rather than exclusively by a sense of Sunni discrimination.

In Syria, Syrians are fighting for different political reasons. Certainly some parties have religion focused political reasons to fight for, and some others have sectarian ones. Also there is sectarian “rhetoric” from both ends of the conflict. Nevertheless, the civil conflict cannot be reduced to a sectarian one. These conflicts have multiple dimensions such as internal sectarian, religious, ethnic, territorial, class-related tensions and so forth, in addition to external factors, such as regional and international political demands.

Nevertheless, sectarian tension should be acknowledged; particularly Sunni-Alawite hostilities. Also, there are indicators of a longterm civil conflict.

Between the revolution and the “absurd” civil war?

The term “civil war” had been adopted by western media to refer to the situation in Syria. It is also frequently used by the United Nations, the UN Security Council and international organizations, as well as in the statements, which are aiming to put an end to the violence, of Mr. Lakhdar Brahimi, the UN peace envoy to Syria. The term is also used by some Arabs and Syrians.

If we examine the descriptions of the Syrian conflict as a ‘civil war’, a particular picture of events emerges: it paints the Syrian conflict as an even battle between two sides, with each trying to achieve power through violence. These two sides are represented as receiving support from regional and international powers, which in turn have different interests of their own. It is thus a proxy warfare on Syria’s land, where Syrians are used as pawns in a cold war between these powers, and where innocent people are paying the price.

On the other hand, the Syrian factions are waging a sectarian war; radical Sunnis opposed to other sects. It is often admitted that the ruling regime, which represents Alawites and other sects (including some ethnic minorities according to some accounts) is horrible and barbaric. Yet, it is only as barbaric as Assad’s opponents who represent the Sunni radicalism and Jihadi Groups through to Al-Qaeda. The international community (including powers that support or oppose the regime) fears that the radical Sunnis will oppress, if not annihilate, the other sects if they succeed in toppling Assad’s regime.

This, then, is the “civil war” with all its viciousness. According to this view, the Syrian state will be entirely destroyed unless the parties of the conflict reach an agreement. There is no winner of a civil war but devastation, and the only solution in Syria is negotiations.

We will call this portrayal: the ‘absurd civil war’. In contradistinction to this narrative, what we believe is really happening in Syria is a popular revolution against a tyrannical regime. Therefore, we object to the aforementioned description for the following reasons:

Firstly, it Implies equality between the executioner and the victim, and this leads to the disappearance of any ethical significance of this struggle. Additionally, it ignores the historical genesis of the conflict and their sequence; from the Daraa children’s incident, to the peaceful demonstrations that had spread gradually gathering hundreds of thousands in the cities of Hama & Der Ezzor, to the sit-ins of Douma, Omari mosque in Daraa and the Clock Square in Homs; besides dozens of people tortured to death in arbitrary detention, and hundreds of incidents that proved the regime’s unwillingness, or inability, to change its conduct. Furthermore, it generally overlooks the modern history of Syria since the coup of 8 March 1963, through the “Corrective Movement”, the bequeathing of power to Bashar Al-Assad, and the rejection of political partnership with any Syrian constituency by the Baath Party and the ruling family.

Besides this, we believe that the Syrian Revolution cannot be viewed apart from the other revolutions of the Arab Spring. The Syrian Revolution is part of a public movement that spread over the region in pursuit of liberation from tyrannical and corrupted regimes. It requires that we disregard this, and focus only on the ongoing battles between the regular army and the Free Syrian Army, to be able to exclusively label the situation in Syria a civil war.

Secondly, with regard to these battles and the nature of the conflict, it is important to remember that, up to this moment at least, there is no war in Syria in the traditional sense that we would understand “war”. There are armed groups fighting a regular state’s army which is equipped with military aircrafts, tanks, armored vehicles, ballistic missiles and chemical weapons. The regime used most of these arms in targeting both unarmed civilians and armed rebels alike, and without differentiation whatsoever. The battle in Syria is not even close to a battle between two equivalent arsenals. With this in mind, we have repeatedly stated that it is inaccurate to label the armed rebels as a “Free Syrian Army”. The term “Armed Popular Resistance” corresponds more accurately to the Syrian case.

Thirdly, and despite the recent dominance of the military aspect of the Syrian Revolution, the exclusive portrayal of the situation in Syria as a civil war means also ignoring the forms of civic and non-violent movement which still represent a fundamental component of the public movement against the regime. In addition to the demonstrations that are still taking place nationwide when possible, there are various forms of civic activities in the fields of relief, media and political organization. In the areas that are still controlled by the regime these activities are conducted undercover, whereas they are better organized and taking place publicly in the areas administrated by the rebels. Hundreds of networks and youth groups are active in the field of documentation and relief; some of them are active in the legal and political fields as well, in addition to contributing to the dozens of newspapers and publications that are edited and distributed inside Syria. Most of these Syrians do not consider themselves involved in an absurd war, but rather as advocates of a democratic political project.

What is happening in Syria was and continues to be a popular revolution against an oppressive totalitarian regime. If it is a revolution, the solution lies in ending the dictatorship. If it is purely a civil war, the solution then lies in negotiations between two equal sides, and maybe leaning towards a political-sectarian quota system!

In most revolutions, there are some people who stand by repression or take a neutral position, for different reasons. There are no pure revolutions within which all people are fully unified, suddenly and without struggle, to get rid of the ruling regime. Some revolutions are easier than others for many different reasons. But there are no revolutions without forms of civil conflict, without losers, without opportunists, without passive people, and without martyrs.

Rebels must not, under any pretext, deny the signs of civil conflict and the distortions created by sectarian alignments. This will only make things worse. No one should feel the need to show a brighter image of what is occurring, because what is happening in Syria is not an “absurd” civil war, but rather a prolonged revolution in various phases of struggle. It is the longest and harshest road to the restoration of freedom.

‘Proxy war’

As for what is called the ‘proxy war’, the term is misleading, and encourages analysts to focus on the interests of external powers in Syria, and judge what is going on according to the complexities of these interests. We, on the other hand, recommend that we must start our discussion with an internal approach. The external elements, in principle are secondary, in the sense that if you care about the future of Syria, you need to start from what Syrians want.

We need to understand what the Syrians want, fear, believe, and why they act in the way they do. It is not an easy task. But it is the only way if you really hold that the future of Syria must be in the hands of the Syrian people and not in the hands of external powers. Even if we can’t change the attitudes of external powers (Russia, America, Iran, Saudi Arabia, etc.), we need to make it clear that what is at stake, from a moral point of view, is the aspirations of the Syrians.

We don’t claim in this article to present a geopolitical analysis of the so called ‘proxy war’ in Syria. That analysis is beyond the scope of this article. But we claim that if you look at what is going on inside Syria you find that the use of the term ‘civil war’ is problematic. We would argue that the internal approach shows that the term ‘absurd proxy war’ is problematic too. However, this needs more discussion, as there are more presumptions involved in the use of this term than the ones we tackled here.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Anti-Government Protests: The Syrian Civil War

...This conflict, like many others, it has its origins in corruption, political capture, poverty, on the violation of human rights, but also inequality. Social movements, spontaneous groups of people, organizations started to claim their rights to achieve a more egalitarian system. Unfortunately four years later, this crisis has finally become one of the biggest disasters in recent history. More than 250,000 Syrians have lost their lives in almost 4 years of armed conflict, that begin with anti-government protest before reaching a catastrophic civil war. In this war the armed forces of the Syrian government faced against to armed rebel groups known in the West as the "Syrian opposition”. At first the protests were not very successful and it seemed...

Words: 414 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Syrian Civil War

...SYRIAN CIVIL WAR Gen 1. The Syrian civil war also commonly known as the Syrian uprising is an ongoing armed conflict in Syria between forces loyal to the Syrian Baath Party government and those seeking to oust it. The conflict began on 15 March 2011, with popular demonstrations that grew nationwide by April 2011. These demonstrations were part of the wider Middle Eastern protest movement known as the Arab Spring. Protesters demanded the resignation of President Bashar al-Assad, whose family has held the presidency in Syria since 1971, as well as the end to over four decades of Baath Party rule. In April 2011, the Syrian Army was deployed to quell the uprising. After months of military sieges, the protests evolved into an armed rebellion. Background 2. The Ba'ath Party government came to power in 1964 after a coup on 1966, another coup overthrew the traditional leaders of the party, Michel Aflaq and Salah al-Din al-Bitar. In 1970, the Defence Minister Hafez al-Assad seized power and declared himself President, a position he would hold until his death in 2000. 3. In 1982, at the height of a six-year Islamist armed insurgency throughout the country, Hafez al-Assad conducted a scorched earth policy against Islamist-held quarters inside the town of Hama to quell an uprising by the Sunni Islamist community, including the Muslim Brotherhood, Salafists and others. This ruthless crackdown became known as the Hama massacre, which left tens of thousands dead. 4. The issue of...

Words: 323 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Syrian Civil War

...ECPSC- 2013 CURRENT AFFAIRS HANDOUT - 11 SYRIAN CIVIL WAR Gen 1. The Syrian civil war also commonly known as the Syrian uprising is an ongoing armed conflict in Syria between forces loyal to the Syrian Baath Party government and those seeking to oust it. The conflict began on 15 March 2011, with popular demonstrations that grew nationwide by April 2011. These demonstrations were part of the wider Middle Eastern protest movement known as the Arab Spring. Protesters demanded the resignation of President Bashar al-Assad, whose family has held the presidency in Syria since 1971, as well as the end to over four decades of Baath Party rule. In April 2011, the Syrian Army was deployed to quell the uprising. After months of military sieges, the protests evolved into an armed rebellion. Background 2. The Ba'ath Party government came to power in 1964 after a coup on 1966, another coup overthrew the traditional leaders of the party, Michel Aflaq and Salah al-Din al-Bitar. In 1970, the Defence Minister Hafez al-Assad seized power and declared himself President, a position he would hold until his death in 2000. 3. In 1982, at the height of a six-year Islamist armed insurgency throughout the country, Hafez al-Assad conducted a scorched earth policy against Islamist-held quarters inside the town of Hama to quell an uprising by the Sunni Islamist community, including the Muslim Brotherhood, Salafists and others. This ruthless crackdown became known as the Hama massacre, which left tens of...

Words: 1020 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Annotated Bibliography: The Syrian Civil War

...Annotated Bibliography Spyer, Jonathan. "The Battle for Aleppo; A report from the front lines of the Syrian civil war." The Weekly Standard 8 Oct. 2012. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 25 Oct. 2016 Article Link: Click here for page Summary Annotation: In the old city of Aleppo with a history of religion and the Dictatorship of Bashar al-Assad. A reporter named Jonathan Spyer went along with a group called Free Syrian Army (FSA) to the center of Aleppo and what Spyer says “ There is a sharp change in atmosphere as one enters Aleppo city from the surrounding countryside.” The city changes into a rubble streeted place with craters all over from the bombs that struck that spot. As they got deeper into the neighborhood, they people who lived there...

Words: 1799 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Syrian Civil War Journal Analysis

...Journal II In the country of Syria there is a civil war going on and the war started between two groups, the Free Syrian Army and The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The beginning of this war started with protest in Damascus about government corruption and human rights abuse, then started to grow substantially to other cities,. Then in March of 2011the Syrian government used deadly violence of the protestors in the country. Then the issue escalated when the protestors started to fight back later that year. In an article from the Syrian Arab News Agency they talk about how there army has killed 19 ISIS members in a recent attack they have been through. In the article they talk about how they killed some of ISIS's leaders during the...

Words: 1031 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Fighting in Syria

...predecssors. “The Arab Spring” as it was called began in Tunisia and spread across the region (Al Jazeera). The protestors in this revolt wanted a myriad of things. Some wanted democracy, respect for civil rights, and some want Islamization of government and a movement to theocracy. Syria, once a province of the Ottoman Empire, is a small middle-eastern nation between Lebanon and Turkey. In March 2011, pro-Democracy Arab Spring protestors who were marching to decry the arrest and torture of teen graffiti artists were fired upon by police. After the shootings, many more protestors joined the public displays of defiance (BBC ). After nationwide unrest and a refusal by President Assad to abdicate, the protestors began to arm themselves (Semple). The violence in the country escalated so quickly that by June of 2013, 90,000 people had been killed in the fighting and that number moved to 250,000 by August of 2015 (BBC ). Into the fray came the self-stylized Islamic State. This terrorist group which is opposed to Assad is fighting to create a Muslim caliphate throughout Iraq and Syria. In June of 2014, the group claimed that it’s caliphate had been established, which lead to US airstrikes to destroy the group, thus entering another belligerent into the fight (BBC). The Syrian Civil War was killed more than 250,000 people and approximately 11-12 million of the nation’s 22 million people are displaced. Approximately 6.5 million people are displaced inside of the country, with ~4.5...

Words: 1225 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Deviance In Syria

...Although the war in Syria begun over 6 years ago, it continues to fill the headlines of news reports around the world. This civil war, a conflict between citizens of the same country, started in 2011. Syrian citizens took to the streets, demanding democracy and opening showing their disapproval of the government and president, Bashar al-Assad. The Assad family has held power in Syria for generations, many citizens blamed them for their lack of freedom, high unemployment rates, and economic woes. When President Bashar al-Assad succeeded his father in 2011, the citizens of Syria started a peaceful uprising to show their discontent and insisted on change. Their protests and demonstrations quickly turned violent. Assad’s government used deadly...

Words: 1400 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Conflict Is Often Indiscriminate Analysis

...“Conflict is often indiscriminate”. I think that the statement means that sometimes wars and other various types of conflict occur regardless of who you are and just at random. My gut reaction regarding the statement is that conflict can be very indiscriminate equally to how conflict can be discriminative. For example, 9/11 was indiscriminate as the attack targeted multiple groups of people and was an attack just to psychologically damage the confidence of US Homeland Security and the US government; as well as other countries around the globe which saw the news broadcasts and thought that their country was going to be attacked next. However, conflicts like the Stonewall Riots, were discriminative, violent conflicts that attacked innocent people...

Words: 811 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

To What Extent Is Security a Necessary Precondition for Development?

...To what extent is security a necessary precondition for development? Introduction It is put forward that security is not necessarily a precondition for development, but rather, both concepts of security and development are inextricably linked. With neither one being predominant over the other; rather the influence of both oscillate, dependent upon the individual circumstances within the State or region. In essence, what this answer will aim to illustrate, is the extent of this link, the theories which explain it, and whether or not security underpins development. Before we begin however, it would be prudent to first, define the concepts of ‘security’ and ‘development’. From the obvious, national security dimension, to the more human-centred, holistic definitions, finding a simple definition for the concept of security is a complex task, due to the variety of ways in which it can be defined. For the purposes of this essay however, the definition provided by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) as security being “the prevention of any threat to individual or national security irrespective of that threat being political or economic in its nature, as such threats would threaten the process of development”[1] would be an appropriate fit, as it incorporates both the traditional State-centric element, and also the more holistic, human security definition.. Traditionally, the definition of development has been one that has been predicated upon a mainly economic...

Words: 3100 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Syria Civil War

...Revolution to Civil War By Maya Bhardwaj Abstract: social movements and regime change across the Middle East and North Africa. While interconnected, uprisings in each nation took different forms and reached out distinctions and interactions between uprisings, revolution, and civil war. standing scholarly debate. The presence or absence of civil war is examined in examinations of civil war: the nature of the governmental regime, territoriality complete understanding of what constitutes civil war and provides a framework 76 Introduction the Middle East, authoritarian regimes thought invulnerable to protest and impossible to oust began to cede to massive protest. Attacks on governmental institutions and elite leaders ensconced from public opinion developed divergently in each nation, employing tailored strategies to mobilize the public and reap key support. This paper focuses on the nature and development of these Arab Spring further use these distinctions to illuminate the conceptual, instrumental, and semantic nature of civil war in general. - exacerbated the grievances felt by rebel forces and smoothed over ethnic, religious, and tribal ten- trastingly, in Syria, instances of mild reform under Bashar al-Assad, popular concerns for security, kept civil war at bay. Conceptual Isolation of Civil War presence or absence of civil war. However, the scholarly distinction between civil war and other insurgency and counter-insurgency, uprisings, genocide or genocidal...

Words: 4840 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

The International Road to Civil War

...of the majority-Christian Phalange Party Pierre Gemayel declared “Neither the present government or any other could shut down a single training camp,” in reference to bases created by several parties to train their armed factions. A year later, Gemayal’s Phalange Party was one of several Lebanese militias embroiled in a war where fighting remained confined within Lebanon but the power struggle transcended borders and involved both regional and international combatants. While April 13, 1975, is often cited as the start date that sparked the 15-year conflict, which has been termed a civil war, a host of factors, including international affairs, economic and social inequality and the sectarian make up of the Lebanese government were responsible for the violent outburst and the war’s duration. The Phalange Party’s April 13 attack on a bus carrying Palestinians, reprisal for a shoot out at a church where Phalange members had been in attendance, was not even mentioned in the relevant chapters on the civil war in Struggle Over Lebanon by Tabitha Petran. Instead, Petran documents the factors that contributed to the setting of the stage for and provoking the civil war. Fear over the increase in sectarian militias had been on the national radar as early as May 1973, when President Suleiman Franjieh convened a special cabinet meeting to discuss possible reforms to curb the militias. Petran begins by listing the increased demands of the Sunni population of Lebanon, which began clamoring...

Words: 1471 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Lebanon

...but this figure, provided by the Lebanese government, does not include Palestinian refugees and foreign workers, mainly Syrian. History : In conquering Lebanon, the Muslims fought the Christian armies of Byzantium, whom they called the Roumis. The Byzantines were defeated, and retreated further north. Lebanon was made part of the Sham territory of the Islamic Empire. Islam became the Law and official religion of the land. Christians and Jews were allowed to worship as long as they paid taxes to the Muslims, and obeyed their laws. Arabic became the official language of the region The privileging of Christians in governmental positions was one of the main reasons for the civil war, when the population percentage shifted in favor of the Muslims The first Arab-Israeli war broke out, and hundreds of thousands of Palestinians fled their homes as Israeli troops advanced on them. About 150,000 Palestinians became refugees in Lebanon. The Palestinians come to play an important, if indirect, part in Lebanese politics.  Outgoing President Amine Gemayel appoints an interim military government under Maronite Commander-in-Chief Michel Aoun in East Beirut when presidential elections fail to produce a successor. Prime Minister Selim el-Hoss forms a mainly Muslim rival administration in West Beirut. Politics : Hizbo lah The United States has declared that Hezbollah (Party of God) is a major terrorist organization, but public officials in Lebanon, where the group is based...

Words: 548 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Devil's Backbone

...impressions It is always a good idea to register your response to a film right after viewing as you are still emotionally involved in the story. Use some of these points to help you. 1. Did you like or dislike the film? Why? (either answer is valid – but it is always interesting to explore the reasons). I did like the film because of the beautiful barren imagery, ingenious use of symbolism and Del Toro’s unique way of bringing out societal issues in a highly suggestive manner. I also enjoyed the role of the ghost to push the story line forwards with each apparition. 2. What, do you believe is the main theme of the film? The Spanish Civil War, more specifically how Franco’s army and the right-winged parties consolidated while the left-winged opposition fragmented and was, eventually, forced out. Also there is a general message about war and how such terrifying events can rob children of their childhoods. 3. Were you frightened during the story? Of what? Which characters were more frightening – Santi? Jacinto? Did this response change as the film progressed? If so, how? At first the movie seems like any other typical ghost/horror story, where one grows weary of the ghost’s presence primarily due to fear of the unknown. However, as the storyline develops, one becomes uncomfortably accustomed to the ghost’s appearance. Furthermore, after learning the circumstances behind Santi’s death and Jacinto’s involvement in the murder, one becomes morally sympathetic of Santi’s...

Words: 1728 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Prison Use

...Prison is used for many different reasons. When the word prison come up the first thing people think is a place where bad people go that have committed a crime. That is not always the case, prison can be a place where the mentally ill, prisoners of war, and even people who couldn’t pay what they owed. Prison isn’t what you would call “home” and doesn’t have a clean, relax vibe. For an example the prison camps during the American Civil War were harsh and big on spreading diseases and with diseases comes death. In the 18th and 19th centurie when people weren’t able to pay back money they owed they would be put in jail to work off their debt. The rules still remain the same even today, if you were to not pay taxes there would be consequences which would mostly likely lead to jail time. In prison there are 3 parts to security. First you have maxiumum which is the top and most scariest prisoners. Mainly for prisoners that have murdered someone, escape, or done a harsh crime. In maxiumum security there is cameras watching, the prisoners are locked in there cell for 22 ½ hours a day. They get a hour to exerscise than its back to the cell. Theres not much for them to do. Next you have minimumu security which is a lot like a college campus they are for the prisoners that aren’t as violent as medium and maximum. Prisoners that didn’t have that bad of a record or served most of their time in a higher prison where here. There is usually more privelages given to...

Words: 316 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

His 115 Complete Class

...and Contrast Matrix HIS 115 Week 2-DQ 1 HIS 115 Week 2-DQ 2 HIS 115 Week 3-Assignment Seven Years' War Paper HIS 115 Week 3-CheckPoint - Great Britain and the Colonies HIS 115 Week 4-Appendix C - The Confederation Government Table HIS 115 Week 4-DQ 1 HIS 115 Week 4-DQ 2 HIS 115 Week 5-Assignment - Western Expansion Presentation HIS 115 Week 5-Checkpoint - Hamilton's Financial Program HIS 115 Week 5-Checkpoint - War of 1812 HIS 115 Week 6-CheckPoint - The Bank War HIS 115 Week 6-DQ 1 HIS 115 Week 6-DQ 2 HIS 115 Week 7-Assignment - Perfection Era Paper HIS 115 Week 7-CheckPoint - Class Structure and Slave Culture HIS 115 Week 8-Appendix D - Civil War Matrix HIS 115 Week 8-DQ 1 HIS 115 Week 8-DQ 2 HIS 115 Week 9-Capstone Checkpoint HIS 115 Week 9-Final Project - Historical Timeline and Essay Activity mode aims to provide quality study notes and tutorials to the students of HIS 115 COMPLETE CLASS in order to ace their studies. HIS 115 COMPLETE CLASS To purchase this visit here: http://www.activitymode.com/product/his-115-complete-class/ Contact us at: SUPPORT@ACTIVITYMODE.COM HIS 115 COMPLETE CLASS HIS 115 Week 1-Assignment - North American Civilization Paper HIS 115 Week 1-CheckPoint - European Societal Changes HIS 115 Week 2-Appendix B - Compare and Contrast Matrix HIS 115 Week 2-DQ 1 HIS 115 Week 2-DQ 2 HIS 115 Week 3-Assignment Seven Years' War Paper HIS 115 Week 3-CheckPoint - Great Britain and the Colonies HIS 115 Week 4-Appendix C - The Confederation...

Words: 463 - Pages: 2