Tax Problem

In: Business and Management

Submitted By missyrox08
Words 568
Pages 3
SCHEDULE M (Form 1040A or 1040)
Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service (99)
Making Work Pay Credit
▶ Attach to Form 1040A or 1040. ▶ See separate instructions.
OMB No. 1545-0074
2010
Attachment Sequence No. 166
Name(s) shown on return
Your social security number
1
(e) You are filing Form 2555 or 2555-EZ.
a
Important: Check the “No” box on line 1a and see the instructions if:
Do you (and your spouse if filing jointly) have 2010 wages of more than $6,451 ($12,903 if married filing jointly)?
Yes. Skip lines 1a through 3. Enter $400 ($800 if married filing jointly) on line 4 and go to line 5.
No. Enter your earned income (see instructions) .......
1a
b
Nontaxable combat pay included on line 1a (see instructions) .........
1b
2
Multiply line 1a by 6.2% (.062) ..............
2
3
Enter $400 ($800 if married filing jointly) ...........
3
4
Enter the smaller of line 2 or line 3 (unless you checked “Yes” on line 1a) .........
4
5
Enter the amount from Form 1040, line 38*, or Form 1040A, line 22 ..
5
6
Enter $75,000 ($150,000 if married filing jointly) ........
6
7
Is the amount on line 5 more than the amount on line 6?
No.
Skip line 8. Enter the amount from line 4 on line 9 below.
Yes.
Subtract line 6 from line 5 ............
7
8
Multiply line 7 by 2% (.02) ........................
8
9
Subtract line 8 from line 4. If zero or less, enter -0- ................
10
Did you (or your spouse, if filing jointly) receive an economic recovery payment in 2010? You mayhave received this payment in 2010 if you did not receive an economic recovery payment in 2009 but you received social security benefits, supplemental security income, railroad retirement benefits, or veterans disability compensation or pension benefits in November 2008, December 2008, or January 2009 (see instructions).
No.
Enter -0- on line 10 and go to line…...

Similar Documents

Tax Problem

... recovery payment in 2010? You mayhave received this payment in 2010 if you did not receive an economic recovery payment in 2009 but you received social security benefits, supplemental security income, railroad retirement benefits, or veterans disability compensation or pension benefits in November 2008, December 2008, or January 2009 (see instructions). No. Enter -0- on line 10 and go to line 11. Yes. Enter the total of the payments you (and your spouse, if filing jointly) received in 2010. Do not enter more than $250 ($500 if married filing jointly)............ 10 11 Making work pay credit. Subtract line 10 from line 9. If zero or less, enter -0-. Enter the result here and on Form 1040, line 63; or Form 1040A, line 40.............. 11 *If you are filing Form 2555, 2555-EZ, or 4563 or you are excluding income from Puerto Rico, see instructions. For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see your tax return instructions. Cat. No. 52903Q Schedule M (Form 1040A or 1040) 2010 (a) You have a net loss from a business, (b) You received a taxable scholarship or fellowship grant not reported on a Form W-2, (c) Your wages include pay for work performed while an inmate in a penal institution, ¶ ! CAUTION To take the making work pay credit, you must include your social security number (if filing a joint return, the number of either you or your spouse) on your tax return. A social security number does not include an identification number issued by the IRS. Only the Social......

Words: 568 - Pages: 3

Income Tax

...12.) Which is more appropriate tax rate to use to compare taxpayers’ tax burdens-the average or the effective tax rate? Why? -Effective tax rate would be the most appropriate because it provides a better depiction of a taxpayer’s tax burden. The reason for this is because it depicts the taxpayer’s total tax paid as a ratio of the sum of both taxable and nontaxable income earned. 14.) Arnold and Lilly have recently had a heated discussion about whether a sales tax is a proportional tax or a regressive tax. Arnold argues that a sales tax is regressive. Lilly counters that the sales tax is a flat tax. Who is correct? -Arnold and Lilly are both correct. The reason Lilly is correct is because a sales tax by definition is a proportional tax. As taxable purchase increase the sales tax rate (marginal tax rate) remains constant. Arnold is correct because one’s total income spent on taxable purchases likely decreases as total income increases, so the sales tax may be considered a regressive tax. 16.) What is the tax base for the Social Security and Medicare taxes for an employee or employer? What is the tax base for Social Security and Medicare taxes for a Self-employed individual? Is the Self-employment tax in addition to or in lieu of federal income tax? -The tax base for the Social Security and Medicare taxes for an employee or employer is the employee wage. The tax base for Social Security and Medicare taxes for a Self-employed individual is the Net earnings......

Words: 367 - Pages: 2

Tax Research Problem

...To: Tax File Date: 10/30/12 Facts: Walter Hodges wants to begin a business involving real estate. In spring of 2010, Walter began marketing his business. In October, Walter paid $25,000 for training classes. In November 2010, he obtained a loan of $145,000. Also, in November he obtained an employer ID number from the IRS. In December 2010, Walter opened necessary banking accounts for his business. Walter was able to acquire his first property on December 30 2010. He listed the property and began renting it successfully in March of 2011. Walter prepared a schedule C and listed a business loss of $29,000, which includes the cost of the training classes, automobile expenses, meals and entertainment, computer and software expenses, and supplies. The IRS has disallowed the deduction of $ 29,000. Issue: Is Walter allowed to deduct the business loss of $29,000 in 2010? Conclusion: The $29,000 loss is not considered as business expense; therefore, no deduction is allowed. Analysis: The loss of $29,000 is not deductible, because Walter was not “engaged in the active conduct of trade or business” in 2010. Under 26 U.S.C.S. § 162, it generally allows deduction for all the ordinary and necessary expense incurred during the taxable year. However, the taxpayer in Woody v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo 2009-93, attempted to deduct his business expense incurred during the taxable year, which he was preparing for starting business. Court considered that “A taxpayer is not carrying...

Words: 471 - Pages: 2

Korea Tax

...October 6th 2012 Soojin Lee Taxable Income (KRW million) Over 300 88 ~ 300 46 ~ 88 Marginal Rate (%) 38 35 24 12 ~ 46 0 ~ 12 15 6 Statutory Corporate Income Tax (from fiscal years beginning on or after 1.1.2012) Taxable Income (KRW million) Over 20,000 200 ~ 20,000 0 ~ 200 Marginal Rate (%) 22 20 10 Data Source: Korean Tax Service, access: http://www.nts.go.kr ∑( Dividend + Interest Income) < KRW 40 Mil. • Dividend income is taxed by withholding, at 14% • Dividend Tax Credits ∑( Dividend + Interest Income) > KRW 40 Mil. • Included in global income • Subject to ordinary income tax rate Corporate Shareholders • Double taxation can be partially eliminated by DRD (Dividend Received Deduction) for corporate shareholders. DRD • Allowable DRD range: 30% to 100% (100% DRD for 100% ownership applied) Foreign Corporation Recipient • Subject to withholding tax at 22% ( included 2% Local income tax)  VAT Revenues as a percentage of GDP 2010 VAT = 46,949 (KRW Billion) 2010 GDP = 1,172,803 (KRW Billion) = 4.0 % Data source: Bank of Korea (http://ecos.bok.or.kr) 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1995 2000 2005 2008 2009 2010 Data Source:OECD Revenue Statistics. 1965-2010 Data Source : OECD Revenue Statistics. 1965-2010 Data Source: Korean Tax Service : access: http://www.nts.go.kr  Tax System: Classical √ vs. Imputed No  Progressivity: Yes √ Treatment of Dividends  ◦ Dividend Received Deduction...

Words: 450 - Pages: 2

Tax Project

..., which is unfair to people who cannot afford a second home. During a good economy when the real estate market preforms well, people invest in a second home to capture this appreciation in property value as well as a tax benefit. For rich people, investing in a second home becomes a good strategy to save on income taxes. Although the current tax law gives a tax relief to a second home owner, I think the law should be modified because it creates unfairness between people who can afford a second residence and those who can’t. Interest Deduction for Home Equity Interest Home debt is any debt that is secured by a personal residence that is not an acquisition debt. The general rule of the interest treatment is that the interest paid on a home equity debt of $100,000 or less is deductible, but total debt cannot exceed the fair market value of the property. The problem of this tax law is similar to the one originated in the interest deduction for second homes, it creates unfairness. People normally make a home equity loan to buy some personal goods, and since personal interest is not deductible, I think this tax benefit on the home equity loan should be closed. If a poor person wants to get a car, he or she will need to make a personal loan, and pay huge interest that is not income tax deductible. However, when a rich person who owns a property wants to get a car, he or she can make a home equity loan and pay cash for the car. The interest on the loan is normally very......

Words: 2342 - Pages: 10

Tax Module

... Payable Employment Business AFM 362 – Taxation 1 2 Property Net TCG Dividends - Indiv Cdn Eligible Inelig For'n OI/OD TOTAL Cdn For'n Cdn For'n Employment Business Property Net TCG OI/OD ABIL Div B Div C CGD (I) Net CL Non CL Stock Option Taxable Personal DTC FTC x x x x x x +/+/+/+/+/+ + + + +/- x x x Corporate – Division C and Tax Payable Employment (PSB) Employment Business Property Net TCG OI/OD ABIL Div B Div C Donations Dividends Net CL Non CL Taxable Corporate Basic Abatement SBD M&P RDTOH FTC Gen ART Part IV 13% x 13% 6 2/3% 6 2/3% 6 2/3% 33 1/3% 38% 10% 38% 10% 17% 13% 26 2/3% 26 2/3% x 26 2/3% 33 1/3% x 38% 38% 10% 38% 10% 38% 10% 38% 38% 38% 38% 10% x x x x ? +/+/+/+/+/+ +/+ + + Business Cdn For'n Property Cdn For'n Conn Net TCG Dividends - Corp Cdn Port For'n TOTAL OI/OD Module 8 – Capital Gains/Losses Module 8 – Problem 1 AFM 362 – Taxation 1 3 During the year Rachael had the following transactions in common shares of Carnegie Inc., a Canadian public company. She would like you, as her tax adviser, to explain the tax consequences to her of each of the following transactions: Date Jan 15/13 Feb 20/13 Transaction Purchase Purchase Price / Number share of Shares $ 35 37 1,000 200 120 1,320 15 13 100 200 75 125 Broker Fees $ 700 150 1 2 Notes April 5/13 Stock dividend - 10% Sept 16/13 Stock split Nov 30/13 Sold Dec 12/13 Purchase Notes: 1. 2. 3. The April 5, 2013 stock dividend resulted in an increase in paid-up capital of $30 per share. The stock...

Words: 1792 - Pages: 8

Tax Research Problem 12-62

...In this tax research problem, we have a couple – Mr. and Mrs. Hattan, who have lived in their home for 20 years. They have purchased the home for $100,000 as joint tenants with right of survivorship. Mr. Hattan died in May of the current year when the house’s FMV was $800,000. Mrs. Hattan wants to sell the house. The purpose of this research is to determine the tax effect of selling the house this year for $825,000 or next year for $830,000. This research is based on Internal Revenue Code sections 121 and 1014. We will determine what the most favorable choice is for Mrs. Hattan, as far as the property is concerned. It will be in her best interest to choose the option which will give her higher after-tax earnings from the sale. Legal fees and sales commission will not be considered for this problem. Section 121 from the Internal Revenue Code explains the exclusions of gain from sale of principal residence. Based on the IRC § 121, Mrs. Hattan will be qualified for an exclusion of up to $500,000 as long as she sells the property no later than two years after the death of her spouse. This means that she can claim the exclusion no matter if she sells the house this or next year. Section 1041 from the Internal Revenue Code states the rules for calculating the basis of the property acquired by a decedent. To determine the extent to which the gain from the sale of the property is taxable, we need to determine the basis of the property. According to IRC § 1041, the basis of the...

Words: 494 - Pages: 2

Tax Research Problem I: 7-67

...Mark Hancock, a self-employed attorney owns his own law practice as an unincorporated sole proprietorship. Hancock is having to pay $18,000 in interested on tax that he owes because in 2012 the IRS disallowed several business deductions that he used in 2010 and 2011. He is now having to pay the deficiency, assessed penalties, and $18,000 in interest on the tax he owed. Mark Hancock is wondering if he can deduct the interest he owes in the current year. Sec 162 states “Section 162(a) allows a deduction for all the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business. Section 262, however, provides that no deduction is allowed for personal, living, or family expenses.” Sec. 163 states “There shall be allowed as a deduction all interest paid or accrued within the taxable year on indebtedness”. The case Kikalos v Comm., in 1997 Nick and Helen Kikalos underreported their income and they owed more than tax then they had paid. They petitioned with the court to deduct their interest payments from the previous years that was filed incorrectly. They owed more than $300,000 from penalties. The court denied their request because it is a personal expense not a business expense because underpayment does not constitute as a business expense. Even though Mark Hancock’s interest of $18,000 is in relation to his business, it is considered non-deductible personal interest because it was an underpayment that was owed due to filing......

Words: 373 - Pages: 2

Tax Introduction

....  Individuals and organizations continually reevaluat e nature and level of services they want from governments wh ich 9 results in reassessment of the tax system to pay fo r those services. o Tax Base Changes  If the tax system does not raise enough revenue, go vernment is forced to change the system.  Loss of revenue generating power is often attributa ble to eroding tax base.  If dependent on real property taxes and population or property values decrease, raising tax rate can make problem worse.  This leads to looking for alternative tax bases or sources of nontax revenue.  Legalized Gambling  Lotteries originally provided so lucrative that 43 states enacted them. o Approximately 65% of ticket sales are provided to winners.  Many states went into the casino business and gave private gambling corporations legal monopolies to operate within the state. o Slot machines generally pay back a minimum of 80 percent of money fed into them.  All but two states today depend on some form of gambling as a source of revenue.  Gambling revenues are devoted to many popular services.  Sales Tax Expansion  State and local governments are aggressive in explo iting new tax bases that develop in the economy.  States usually apply state tax to retail purchases of tangible property but not retail services.  Service sectors have expanded significantly so stat es are adding......

Words: 3218 - Pages: 13

Tax Avoidance

... business activities in favourable jurisdictions. More understandably, the term ‘tax avoidance’ is also used to describe situations which occur where elaborate sequences of – typically purely financial – transactions are undertaken to exploit perceived technical loopholes in the law. These may be implemented both by individuals and companies that have most or all of their economic activity within the UK, and that are attracted by aggressive tax avoidance schemes in the (often forlorn) hope that their tax liabilities will be significantly reduced. This is a more authentic use of the term ‘tax avoidance’. We discussed “Taxing multinationals – the balancing act” in the previous issue of Big Picture. Here, we shall consider this proper use of the term ‘tax avoidance’ and where avoidance becomes abuse, and, in particular, the merits and disadvantages of some measures to control it. T • With governments continually thwarted in their attempts to close loopholes, the current focus is on two measures: the compulsory disclosure of tax avoidance schemes (DOTAS); and a new general anti-abuse rule (GARR) to combat highly contrived tax avoidance schemes. • Both of these weapons should prove effective, but they must be properly targeted on tax abuse and aggressive tax avoidance, and must not adversely affect reasonable and necessary tax planning. THE PROBLEM The basics of UK tax law are simple. Income, gains, sales, inheritances, and transactions in land are put into...

Words: 4175 - Pages: 17

Tax Research Problem I: 7-67

...The purpose of this tax research problem is to solve the following scenario presented by Rupert, Pope, & Anderson: “Mark Hancock is a self-employed attorney who operates his law practice as an unincorporated sole proprietorship. In 2012, the IRS disallowed several business deductions he took in 2010 and 2011. In addition to paying the deficiency and assessed penalties, he also pays $18,000 in interest on the tax owed. Can he deduct that interest in the current year?” (p. 7-45). This is a highly controversial subject that has been contested many times over the years. “Prior to the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the tax court in several cases had deemed an income tax deficiency to be an ordinary and necessary business expense for purposes of determining a taxpayer's adjusted gross income, net operating loss carryover, and net operating carryback, so long as that deficiency was attributable to the ordinary operation of the taxpayer's business” (Rovner, 2015, para. 6). Therefore, businesses could deduct the interest they paid for IRS penalties from previous years as a business expense before 1986. The decision of whether or not a business could deduct interest incurred as a result of IRS imposed penalties was brought to the spotlight in the 1990’s. “On their income tax returns for 1992 and 1994, Nick and Helen Kikalos deducted as a business expense the interest they paid on tax deficiencies that had been assessed for prior years. The Internal Revenue Service disallowed the...

Words: 701 - Pages: 3

Business Tax

... personal exemptions 50,000 ===== Problem 3-12 Husband Wife Basic personal exemption (married) 50,000 50,000 Additional exemption (2 x 25,000) 50,000 - HHIP - - Total personal exemptions 100,000 50,000 ====== ===== Problem 3-13 Basic personal exemption (married) 50,000 Additional exemption (25,000 x 1) 25,000 HHIP - Total personal exemptions 75,000 ===== Problem 3-14 Husband Wife Basic personal exemption (married) 50,000 50,000 Additional exemption (3 x 25,000) 25,000 50,000 HHIP - - Total personal exemptions 75,000 100,000 ===== ====== Problem 3-15 Husband Wife Basic personal exemption (married) 50,000 50,000 Additional exemption (4 x 25,000) 75,000 25,000 HHIP - - Total personal exemptions 100,000 75,000 ===== ===== Chapter 4 True or False 4-1 1. True 2. False. An income is non-taxable if it is expressly excluded by the Tax Code or any other special laws. 3. False. The law provides which income is non-taxable. 4. True 5. True 6. False. The presence of employer-employee relationship is the primary factor whether an income is compensation income or not. 7. False. Not all payments, like de minimis benefits, are taxable compensation income. 8. False. The point of reckoning is at the time when service has been rendered and not at the time of payment. 9. False. Allowances...

Words: 18322 - Pages: 74

Tax Reformation

... policy is to minimalize the interloping by the tax system within that process. The conformist confidence that taxing income involves a greater welfare cost or is more efficient than taxing consumption is primarily based on the observation that the income tax consists of two broad components: a labor tax and a capital tax. Income tax, however, has come under much scrutiny in terms of its success rate in developing countries. The remain reasons for its failure are described to be that the personal income tax has contributed little, towards reduce Easa Faheem S11422649 Bachelors Degree in Human Resource Management 9 Subject code: BBEK1103 Subject: Principles of Microeconomics inequality in many developing countries. Moreover, the opportunity costs also exist from relying on taxes for redistributive purposes. Furthermore, the country also needs to be clear of excessive income taxing though. Succeeding the English and American tax model in the 1980s reform, it became a commonly acknowledged economic convention that high income tax rates like those that prevailed in all OECD countries before 1980 were too costly in terms of their impact on economic performance. Another concern in the choice between taxing income and taxing consumption involves their relative impact on (vertical) equity. This concern is particularly important in view of the uneven income distribution in developing countries. There was another problem in taxing individuals and......

Words: 4493 - Pages: 18

Tax Environment

.... Government borrowing from State Bank of Pakistan has reached astronomical figures. The burden of circular debt has shot up to 63 percent from 58 percent of GDP. This financial inflexibility has ultimately squeezed public sector development programs with the result that government spending on education and health sector is equal to nothing. It is unfortunate that the Government has failed to persuade the feudal class to give taxes but on the other hand the poor salaried individuals are the victim of withholding tax regime. Besides this inequality there are many loopholes in the prevailing tax system by which rich class manage to evade taxes but poor is forced to bear the brunt of taxes. Tax exemptions/subsidies are also by and large given to the class that has the ability to pay the taxes. Besides inequality the biggest problem remains social as people do not feel it as their duty to pay taxes yet they demand services. Tax to GDP ratio can be enhanced only when all sectors of economy contribute proportionately toward tax revenue, but if we analyze different sectors, their contribution in overall economy does not match with their contribution to Tax-to-GDP ratio in Pakistan, for example whole sale and retail sector, transport, construction, hotels, restaurants and commission agents. According to FBR estimates the contribution of most of the sectors like banking, insurance and telecommunication is also below potential. Live stock is contributing 50 percent of the value......

Words: 5922 - Pages: 24

Tax, Personal Tax

...I think that Murray should not follow the suggestion of his immediate supervisor, because it’s actually not only against tax-related regulations but also the moral codes. What happened to this case? Let’s go back and take a look. First of all, the mistake came from the deficiency of tax calculation of selling taxpayer’s duplex. Then, the error was overlooked during the review process. Lastly, Murray’s immediate supervisor intentionally said forgot it. Conspicuously, this is a case of human error which can be redeemed when it was found at the last step. So, if the company can be more responsible and take some active actions, they can totally make this case right. For Murray, the first and foremost thing to do is to double check the case and make sure the mistake of the case is exactly as he found. Then, he still needs to go to his supervisor and explain to him patiently about the case in order to get him to face this question straight. If his supervisor doesn’t decide to fix their mistake, then Murray may inform this tough situation to the firm’s board of directors even the accounting agency. As an accountant, Murray has both a legal and ethical responsibility to report this error. If they wait IRS to come to them, he could be forced to jail, even lose his license. In the end, Murray and his colleagues need to tell the client about the mistake they made, ask them to follow the rules and pay more taxes and at the same time give remediation of the miscalculation and......

Words: 269 - Pages: 2