Tax Problems

In: Business and Management

Submitted By yayitaworld1
Words 446
Pages 2
Chapter 3
Tom and Linda are married taxpayers who file a joint return. They have itemized deductions of $11,950 and four exemptions. Assuming an adjusted gross income of $40,000, what is their taxable income for 2011?
Problem 31 | |
Adjusted Gross Income | $40,000.00 |
Adjusted Gross Income minus itemized deduction | -$11,950.00 |
Exemption 1 | -3700 |
Exemption 2 | -3700 |
Exemption 3 | -3700 |
Exemption 4 | -3700 |
2011 taxable Income | $13,250.00 |

Compute Marie's taxable income for 2011, assuming she is single and claims two dependent children. Her adjusted gross income is $70,000, and she has itemized deductions of $9,000.

Adjusted Gross Income | $70,000.00 |
Adjusted Gross Income instead of standard deduction of $8,500 as head of household | -$9,000.00 |
Exemption 1 | -$3,700.00 |
Exemption 2 | -$3,700.00 |
Exemption 3 | -$3,700.00 |
2011 taxable Income | $49,900.00 |

Compute Stanley's taxable income for 2011, assuming he has $1,000 in wages from working in a grocery store and $2,000 in interest income from some bonds he owns. Stanley, age 16, is claimed as a dependent on his parents' return.

Gross Income | 1000+2000= | $ 3,000.00 |
Standard Deduction | 1000+300 | $ (1,300.00) |
Taxable Income | | $ 1,700.00 |

Chapter 13

Mr. Z, a nondealer, sold assets on an installment plan. Determine Mr. Z's gross income for 2011. Relevant data include:

Year | Installment Sales | Gross Profit | 2011 Collections | GP% | Mr. Z's gross income for 2011 |
2009 | $200,000.00 | $50,000.00 | $25,000.00 | 25.00% | $ 6,250.00 |
2010 | $300,000.00 | $81,000.00 | $80,000.00 | 27.00% | $ 21,600.00 |
2011 | $400,000.00 | $96,000.00 | $125,000.00 | 24.00% | $ 30,000.00 |
| | | | | $ 57,850.00…...

Similar Documents

Tax Problem

... recovery payment in 2010? You mayhave received this payment in 2010 if you did not receive an economic recovery payment in 2009 but you received social security benefits, supplemental security income, railroad retirement benefits, or veterans disability compensation or pension benefits in November 2008, December 2008, or January 2009 (see instructions). No. Enter -0- on line 10 and go to line 11. Yes. Enter the total of the payments you (and your spouse, if filing jointly) received in 2010. Do not enter more than $250 ($500 if married filing jointly)............ 10 11 Making work pay credit. Subtract line 10 from line 9. If zero or less, enter -0-. Enter the result here and on Form 1040, line 63; or Form 1040A, line 40.............. 11 *If you are filing Form 2555, 2555-EZ, or 4563 or you are excluding income from Puerto Rico, see instructions. For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see your tax return instructions. Cat. No. 52903Q Schedule M (Form 1040A or 1040) 2010 (a) You have a net loss from a business, (b) You received a taxable scholarship or fellowship grant not reported on a Form W-2, (c) Your wages include pay for work performed while an inmate in a penal institution, ¶ ! CAUTION To take the making work pay credit, you must include your social security number (if filing a joint return, the number of either you or your spouse) on your tax return. A social security number does not include an identification number issued by the IRS. Only the Social......

Words: 568 - Pages: 3

Income Tax

...12.) Which is more appropriate tax rate to use to compare taxpayers’ tax burdens-the average or the effective tax rate? Why? -Effective tax rate would be the most appropriate because it provides a better depiction of a taxpayer’s tax burden. The reason for this is because it depicts the taxpayer’s total tax paid as a ratio of the sum of both taxable and nontaxable income earned. 14.) Arnold and Lilly have recently had a heated discussion about whether a sales tax is a proportional tax or a regressive tax. Arnold argues that a sales tax is regressive. Lilly counters that the sales tax is a flat tax. Who is correct? -Arnold and Lilly are both correct. The reason Lilly is correct is because a sales tax by definition is a proportional tax. As taxable purchase increase the sales tax rate (marginal tax rate) remains constant. Arnold is correct because one’s total income spent on taxable purchases likely decreases as total income increases, so the sales tax may be considered a regressive tax. 16.) What is the tax base for the Social Security and Medicare taxes for an employee or employer? What is the tax base for Social Security and Medicare taxes for a Self-employed individual? Is the Self-employment tax in addition to or in lieu of federal income tax? -The tax base for the Social Security and Medicare taxes for an employee or employer is the employee wage. The tax base for Social Security and Medicare taxes for a Self-employed individual is the Net earnings......

Words: 367 - Pages: 2

Tax Research Problem

...To: Tax File Date: 10/30/12 Facts: Walter Hodges wants to begin a business involving real estate. In spring of 2010, Walter began marketing his business. In October, Walter paid $25,000 for training classes. In November 2010, he obtained a loan of $145,000. Also, in November he obtained an employer ID number from the IRS. In December 2010, Walter opened necessary banking accounts for his business. Walter was able to acquire his first property on December 30 2010. He listed the property and began renting it successfully in March of 2011. Walter prepared a schedule C and listed a business loss of $29,000, which includes the cost of the training classes, automobile expenses, meals and entertainment, computer and software expenses, and supplies. The IRS has disallowed the deduction of $ 29,000. Issue: Is Walter allowed to deduct the business loss of $29,000 in 2010? Conclusion: The $29,000 loss is not considered as business expense; therefore, no deduction is allowed. Analysis: The loss of $29,000 is not deductible, because Walter was not “engaged in the active conduct of trade or business” in 2010. Under 26 U.S.C.S. § 162, it generally allows deduction for all the ordinary and necessary expense incurred during the taxable year. However, the taxpayer in Woody v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo 2009-93, attempted to deduct his business expense incurred during the taxable year, which he was preparing for starting business. Court considered that “A taxpayer is not carrying...

Words: 471 - Pages: 2

Korea Tax

...October 6th 2012 Soojin Lee Taxable Income (KRW million) Over 300 88 ~ 300 46 ~ 88 Marginal Rate (%) 38 35 24 12 ~ 46 0 ~ 12 15 6 Statutory Corporate Income Tax (from fiscal years beginning on or after 1.1.2012) Taxable Income (KRW million) Over 20,000 200 ~ 20,000 0 ~ 200 Marginal Rate (%) 22 20 10 Data Source: Korean Tax Service, access: ∑( Dividend + Interest Income) < KRW 40 Mil. • Dividend income is taxed by withholding, at 14% • Dividend Tax Credits ∑( Dividend + Interest Income) > KRW 40 Mil. • Included in global income • Subject to ordinary income tax rate Corporate Shareholders • Double taxation can be partially eliminated by DRD (Dividend Received Deduction) for corporate shareholders. DRD • Allowable DRD range: 30% to 100% (100% DRD for 100% ownership applied) Foreign Corporation Recipient • Subject to withholding tax at 22% ( included 2% Local income tax)  VAT Revenues as a percentage of GDP 2010 VAT = 46,949 (KRW Billion) 2010 GDP = 1,172,803 (KRW Billion) = 4.0 % Data source: Bank of Korea ( 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1995 2000 2005 2008 2009 2010 Data Source:OECD Revenue Statistics. 1965-2010 Data Source : OECD Revenue Statistics. 1965-2010 Data Source: Korean Tax Service : access:  Tax System: Classical √ vs. Imputed No  Progressivity: Yes √ Treatment of Dividends  ◦ Dividend Received Deduction...

Words: 450 - Pages: 2

Tax Project

...RECOMMENDATION FOR SAVING FOR CHILDREN’S EDUCATION Facts: Facts: Taxpayers are married and have three children, ages 9, 7 & 3. Their joint income is currently $200,000 per year. Assumptions: Taxpayers will not have more children and they will not divorce. Their income is $200,000 per year and stays constant. They currently live in California and their children will attend college, specially the UC System, at age 18. So there are 9, 11 and 15 years until the children will need the funds. Due to the parents’ high income, the children will not be eligible for any financial aid. Based on additional assumptions that the tuition inflation rate is 8.3% and the current tuition amount for the UC system is $13,200, Table I shows the tuition amounts needed for each child. Table I: Tuition Amounts Need for Each Child for Each Year of College   | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | Total | 3year old | $ 43,651.7 | $ 47,274.7 | $ 51,198.6 | $ 55,448.0 | $ 197,573 | 7 year old | $ 31,731.2 | $ 34,364.9 | $ 37,217.2 | $ 40,306.2 | $ 143,620 | 9 year old | $ 27,053.9 | $ 29,299.4 | $ 31,731.2 | $ 34,364.9 | $ 122,449.5 | Total |   |   |   |   | $ 463,642.5 | Issue: Based on Table I, it would be difficult to save for the children’s education based on the taxpayer’ income. We do not attempt to maximize the value of our investments due to market risk for different investments. Therefore, the overall goal is to maximize tax savings...

Words: 2342 - Pages: 10

Tax Module

...MODULE 8 – CAPITAL GAINS/LOSSES – FUNDAMENTALS & INTEGRATION CAPITAL GAINS/LOSSES – FUNDAMENTALS Text Coverage – Chapters 7 & 8 You are NOT responsible for the following paragraphs: 7,240 – 7,260.20 7,306 7,370 7,380 7,500 7,600 7,720 8,000 – 8,300 Change in use of a principal residence Special relief for tax-deferred elections made prior to March 4, 2010 Capital gains deferral Certain shares deemed to be capital property Death of a taxpayer Leaving and entering Canada Allowable business investment losses All of Chapter 8 Income for the year = (a) + (b) – (c) – (d) (a) Income from: + + + + Plus: (b) Net TCG for the year (cannot be negative) Taxable net gain from listed personal property (cannot be negative) Less: (c) Other deductions (except if deducted in (a) above) Less: (d) Losses for the year from an office, employment, business or property or ABIL Income for the year cannot be less than zero office, employment business property other income such other deductions as are deducted against this income. Net TCG Revenue Expenses Income Division C Deductions Taxable income Proceeds of disposition (actual or deemed) Cost of disposition Cannot be negative for the year; apply inclusion rate of 50%; can be deferred (s.85, replacement property) CGD, Net CL carryover Taxable Net Gain from LPP – the only place in the Act where losses of other years are deducted in the calculation of income as opposed to taxable income Module 8 – Capital Gains/Losses Personal – Division C and Tax...

Words: 1792 - Pages: 8

Tax Research Problem 12-62

...In this tax research problem, we have a couple – Mr. and Mrs. Hattan, who have lived in their home for 20 years. They have purchased the home for $100,000 as joint tenants with right of survivorship. Mr. Hattan died in May of the current year when the house’s FMV was $800,000. Mrs. Hattan wants to sell the house. The purpose of this research is to determine the tax effect of selling the house this year for $825,000 or next year for $830,000. This research is based on Internal Revenue Code sections 121 and 1014. We will determine what the most favorable choice is for Mrs. Hattan, as far as the property is concerned. It will be in her best interest to choose the option which will give her higher after-tax earnings from the sale. Legal fees and sales commission will not be considered for this problem. Section 121 from the Internal Revenue Code explains the exclusions of gain from sale of principal residence. Based on the IRC § 121, Mrs. Hattan will be qualified for an exclusion of up to $500,000 as long as she sells the property no later than two years after the death of her spouse. This means that she can claim the exclusion no matter if she sells the house this or next year. Section 1041 from the Internal Revenue Code states the rules for calculating the basis of the property acquired by a decedent. To determine the extent to which the gain from the sale of the property is taxable, we need to determine the basis of the property. According to IRC § 1041, the basis of the...

Words: 494 - Pages: 2

Tax Research Problem I: 7-67

...Mark Hancock, a self-employed attorney owns his own law practice as an unincorporated sole proprietorship. Hancock is having to pay $18,000 in interested on tax that he owes because in 2012 the IRS disallowed several business deductions that he used in 2010 and 2011. He is now having to pay the deficiency, assessed penalties, and $18,000 in interest on the tax he owed. Mark Hancock is wondering if he can deduct the interest he owes in the current year. Sec 162 states “Section 162(a) allows a deduction for all the ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred during the taxable year in carrying on any trade or business. Section 262, however, provides that no deduction is allowed for personal, living, or family expenses.” Sec. 163 states “There shall be allowed as a deduction all interest paid or accrued within the taxable year on indebtedness”. The case Kikalos v Comm., in 1997 Nick and Helen Kikalos underreported their income and they owed more than tax then they had paid. They petitioned with the court to deduct their interest payments from the previous years that was filed incorrectly. They owed more than $300,000 from penalties. The court denied their request because it is a personal expense not a business expense because underpayment does not constitute as a business expense. Even though Mark Hancock’s interest of $18,000 is in relation to his business, it is considered non-deductible personal interest because it was an underpayment that was owed due to filing......

Words: 373 - Pages: 2

Tax Introduction

... subdivisons levy income taxes, property t axes, and retail sales taxes. o Value Added Taxes  Many jurisdictions depend heavily on some type of v alue- added tax (VAT) as a revenue source.  Value-added taxes are levied on firms engaged in an y phase of production of goods and are based on the incrementa l value firm adds to the goods.  Firms are often going to shift the incidence of val ue added tax liability to the firm next in the production proces s or ultimately to the consumer. o Jurisdictional Competition  Governments overlap and result are competing for ta x revenue of the same businesses.  Taxpayers often make decisions based on tax plannin g considerations.  Tension between being too aggressive and losing bus iness or too lenient and either not receiving tax payments o r taxing too little.  In the U.S., different levels of tax structure try to rely on different sources. o Duplicative Taxation  Corporations conducting business in more than one s tate face particularly difficult problems of duplicative taxa tion.  Globally, there are networks of bilateral and multi lateral treaties to minimize friction among tax systems and reduce duplicative taxation of international businesses be cause failing to adapt tax systems will hurt the economies.  Systemic Changes o Tax systems are dynamic because they must be attune d to fiscal condition of respective jurisdictions...

Words: 3218 - Pages: 13

Tax Avoidance

...IoD Big Picture Summer 2013 Tax avoidance: remedies and collateral damage SNAPSHOT • The term ‘tax avoidance’ needs to be carefully defined and is not the same as ‘tax abuse’ or ‘tax evasion’. This article considers where avoidance becomes abuse and, in particular, the advantages and disadvantages of some measures to control it. Tax avoidance: remedies and collateral damage Richard Baron, former Head of Taxation at the IoD, and Stephen Herring, his successor, consider the proper use of the term ‘tax avoidance’, where avoidance becomes abuse, and the pros and cons of some measures to control it. • The basics of UK tax law are simple, but difficulties arise from complex transactions that require specific rules – which in turn create opportunities for aggressive tax avoidance and abuse. ax avoidance has rarely been out of the news over the past two years, although the term has also rarely been properly defined and has often been muddled both with tax abuse and, even more incorrectly, tax evasion. Commentary has focused on two separate assertions that tax avoidance is taking place. Firstly, claims that some multinational groups of companies, generally US-owned, have undertaken planning which might involve recognising profits in one country rather than another that has higher corporation tax rates. Secondly, introducing planning arrangements to secure better treatments of financing costs, intellectual property rights and undistributed profits by locating...

Words: 4175 - Pages: 17

Tax Research Problem I: 7-67

...The purpose of this tax research problem is to solve the following scenario presented by Rupert, Pope, & Anderson: “Mark Hancock is a self-employed attorney who operates his law practice as an unincorporated sole proprietorship. In 2012, the IRS disallowed several business deductions he took in 2010 and 2011. In addition to paying the deficiency and assessed penalties, he also pays $18,000 in interest on the tax owed. Can he deduct that interest in the current year?” (p. 7-45). This is a highly controversial subject that has been contested many times over the years. “Prior to the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the tax court in several cases had deemed an income tax deficiency to be an ordinary and necessary business expense for purposes of determining a taxpayer's adjusted gross income, net operating loss carryover, and net operating carryback, so long as that deficiency was attributable to the ordinary operation of the taxpayer's business” (Rovner, 2015, para. 6). Therefore, businesses could deduct the interest they paid for IRS penalties from previous years as a business expense before 1986. The decision of whether or not a business could deduct interest incurred as a result of IRS imposed penalties was brought to the spotlight in the 1990’s. “On their income tax returns for 1992 and 1994, Nick and Helen Kikalos deducted as a business expense the interest they paid on tax deficiencies that had been assessed for prior years. The Internal Revenue Service disallowed the...

Words: 701 - Pages: 3

Business Tax

...Solution Manual Income Taxation (2009 Edition) Chapter 1 True or False 1-1 1. True 2. False. Taxation covers person, properties, rights and transactions. 3. False. Person in taxation includes the concept of partnership, corporation, estate and trust. 4. True 5. False. Taxation as a legislative process is under the power of the legislative body, the Congress. 6. False. Taxation is the primary source of government revenue. Usually, the government resorts to borrowing if taxes collected are not sufficient to defray its budgetary requirements. 7. True 8. True 9. False. Basically, taxes imposed are based on the ability of the taxpayer to pay. 10. False. It is the primary obligation of the state to protect all the constituents regardless of whether they pay or not their tax liabilities. True or False 1-2 1. True 2. True 3. True 4. True 5. True 6. False. The President cannot delegate the power of taxation, since taxation is not vested in the President. Taxation is vested in the legislative body. 7. False. Taxation cannot be separated from the state. The moment a state exists, taxation also exists. 8. False. The making of tax law is undertaken ahead of the collection of taxes. 9. False. Levying refers to the making of tax laws. 10. False. Only the legislative body, the Congress, can grant tax exemptions. True or False 1-3 1. False. It is the legislative branch of the government that is vested with the power...

Words: 18322 - Pages: 74

Tax Reformation

...Subject code: BBEK1103 Subject: Principles of Microeconomics Contents Preface .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 Effects of Tax systemt .................................................................................................................................. 4 Evaluation of Tax Reforms……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..10 Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………....11 References…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….14 Easa Faheem S11422649 Bachelors Degree in Human Resource Management 1 Subject code: BBEK1103 Subject: Principles of Microeconomics Preface This is a work done as part of the module „Principles of Microeconomics‟, which is part of the course Bachelor of Human Resource Management. Consisting of an analysis of a Tax reforms for Maldives, this assignment evaluates the purpose of the tax system, types of tax systems, effects of the tax reform systems to the economy and other factors which affect it. The objective of this work is to develop students‟ ability to analyse the critically tax reform systems of certain country, as well as the various external factors that have an impact on the...

Words: 4493 - Pages: 18

Tax Environment

... are largely collected through a system of deduction at source. Out of total income tax receipts, around 59 percent on average19 were collected through deduction at source in 2011-12 and 28 percent through voluntary payments. The remaining around 12 percent was collected out of demands raised by tax authorities through systems such as audits. There has been a consistent increase in the proportion of income tax raised through presumptive taxes. Under this system a certain percentage is withheld as an advanced tax on certain transactions (e.g. on purchase of a vehicle, withdrawal of cash from banks, etc.). The withheld tax (called the Withholding Tax – or WHT) can be claimed20 against the final tax liability owed after a financial year21. The withholding tax regime, which expanded rapidly in 1990s, presumes that the individual has enough earning capacity to be taxed. WHT is primarily applied on income tax but there is also a system of WHT on sales tax, which is currently limited to five types of withholding tax agents. The Government’s ability to collect revenues from the ‘direct tax’ mechanism has reduced and hence the reliance on WHT regime has increased over the years major withholding taxes contribute around 90 percent of the total WHT revenue. However ,the system of WHT overburdens the corporate sector, as compliance costs are high. This creates problems like the processing, recording, jurisdictional and enforcement issues, accounting problems, etc. for the tax...

Words: 5922 - Pages: 24

Tax, Personal Tax

...I think that Murray should not follow the suggestion of his immediate supervisor, because it’s actually not only against tax-related regulations but also the moral codes. What happened to this case? Let’s go back and take a look. First of all, the mistake came from the deficiency of tax calculation of selling taxpayer’s duplex. Then, the error was overlooked during the review process. Lastly, Murray’s immediate supervisor intentionally said forgot it. Conspicuously, this is a case of human error which can be redeemed when it was found at the last step. So, if the company can be more responsible and take some active actions, they can totally make this case right. For Murray, the first and foremost thing to do is to double check the case and make sure the mistake of the case is exactly as he found. Then, he still needs to go to his supervisor and explain to him patiently about the case in order to get him to face this question straight. If his supervisor doesn’t decide to fix their mistake, then Murray may inform this tough situation to the firm’s board of directors even the accounting agency. As an accountant, Murray has both a legal and ethical responsibility to report this error. If they wait IRS to come to them, he could be forced to jail, even lose his license. In the end, Murray and his colleagues need to tell the client about the mistake they made, ask them to follow the rules and pay more taxes and at the same time give remediation of the miscalculation and......

Words: 269 - Pages: 2