Free Essay

Teleological Argument

In: Religion Topics

Submitted By Georgialad
Words 741
Pages 3
The teleological argument is one of the five arguments for the existence of god. It attempts to prove gods existence by using our experience of the world or universe around us. This makes it a posterior in nature. Teleological arguments can essentially be broken down into two main types pre Darwinian and post Darwinian. We shall focus on pre Darwinian as these are the most traditional of these two arguments. Further sub division of teleological arguments can be identified in the guise of design qua regularity and design qua purpose. It is within these areas that we the find the thinking of two philosophers Aquinas(13thC) and paley (19C).

The teleological design argument gets its name from the Greek word telos which mean end, goal or purpose it is this end or purpose that both Aquinas and paley are looking for that will suggest the existence of a divine creator. We will begin by outlining Aquinas fifth way from the governance of things or the design qua regularity argument. Aquinas observed the universe and concluded that everything in it must be working in some kind of order. In particular he noticed that natural bodies (flowers or insects) behaved in a regular way. For example a daffodil flowers every spring time he then goes on to notice the fact that these natural bodies lack intelligence, by this he means they are not conscious of there own movement. A daffodil does not know that it is spring time but flowers unconsciously. He concludes that as they lack the intelligence to think of there own movement therefore the movement or regularity comes from somewhere else. He suggests than the movement does not occur ‘fortuitously but designedly’ by this he means that there regularity has not come around by sheer chance but something else has caused the flower or natural bodies to obey a regular pattern. Aquinas then goes on to suggest that ‘as an arrow is directed to a mark by an archer’ so too is the movement/regularity of things directed by being with intelligence. The analogy of the arrow and the archer is used by Aquinas to demonstrate the link between god a creation. For Aquinas this intelligence that proves regularity of movement in the universe is god. This is the conclusion of Aquinas design qua regularity argument

Paley’s design qua purpose argument has a different feel from Aquinas as he first focuses on outlining a hypothetical situation and then drawing conclusions about the nature of existence. From this hypothetical this is the essence of any analogy. The analogy begins with paley asking us to imagine us crossing a wasteland and “pitching your foot against a stone” if you were to pick up this stone that you have found, he suggest that you would not immediately question where the stone came from, as there would be nothing remarkable about it. But if you continued to walk across the wasteland and pitched your foot against and old fashioned pocket watch you would not be able to dismiss the watch as you did the stone. Paley argues this is because of the complexity of the watch. The cogs wheels and counter weights in the watch on closer inspection would demonstrate this complexity. Moreover if the pieces of the watch were placed in any other order, the watch wouldn’t fur fill its purpose of telling the time. Paley states that on discovery of this watch you would have to speculate a designer due to the complex nature of the mechanism and its obvious purpose of telling the time.

Using similar logic paley continues his analogy by moving onto his observations of the universe or world around us. In particular paley focuses on the human eye to demonstrate complex city and purpose. Paley observed that the human eye was made up of different complex components the cornea iris ect. And the coming together of these parts could not have come about by sheer chance alone as it is to complex. He suggests that just as in the case of the watch with its clear complex city and purpose we must conclude a designer of the eye as its clear purpose is seeing. If the eye was put together in any different order it wouldn’t see or would only have partial sight either case would see it failing its overall purpose, to see. This designer or provider of purpose is for Paley the god of Christianity.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Explain Paley's Teleological Argument

...Explain Paley’s Teleological argument (25) According to the argument from design, or teleological argument, the design or order found in the universe provides evidence for the existence of an intelligent designer (or orderer) usually identified as God. A classic version of this argument appears in William Paley's 1802 Natural Theology, where Paley compares the complexity of living things to the inferior complexity of a watch that we deduce to be designed by an intelligent being. Just as a watch could not exist without a watchmaker, Paley argued, living things could not exist without an intelligent designer.  The teleological or design argument is a derivative of the Greek word Telos which means end, goal or purpose. It is this end or purpose that Paley is looking for that suggests the existence of a divine creator. Aquinas’ fifth way ‘From the governance of things’ or design qua regularity argument (qua meaning through or pertaining to) foregrounding the argument for design, observed the universe and saw that everything in the universe appeared to be working in some sort of order. In particular he noticed that ‘natural bodies’ behaved in a regular way. Here Aquinas addresses flowers or insects - One could use the example of a daffodil that flowers in spring time. He then goes on to evaluate the fact that these natural bodies ‘lack intelligence’ - they are not conscious or sentient beings of their own movement, yet even so they appear to move or act in regular fashion - as...

Words: 1739 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

What Is the Teleological Argument for the Existence of God?

...Got Questions What is the Teleological argument for the existence of God? Subscribe to our Question of the Week: Teleological argument Question: "What is the Teleological argument for the existence of God?" Answer: The word teleology comes from telos, which means "purpose" or "goal." The idea is that it takes a "purposer" to have purpose, and so, where we see things obviously intended for a purpose, we can assume that those things were made for a reason. In other words, a design implies a designer. We instinctively make these connections all the time. The difference between the Grand Canyon and Mount Rushmore is obvious—one is designed, one is not. The Grand Canyon was clearly formed by non-rational, natural processes, whereas Mount Rushmore was clearly created by an intelligent being—a designer. When we are walking on a beach and find a wristwatch, we do not assume that time and random chance produced the watch from blowing sand. Why? Because it has the clear marks of design—it has a purpose, it conveys information, it is specifically complex, etc. In no scientific field is design considered to be spontaneous; it always implies a designer, and the greater the design, the greater the designer. Thus, taking the assumptions of science, the universe would require a designer beyond itself (i.e., a supernatural designer). The teleological argument applies this principle to the whole universe. If designs imply a designer...

Words: 532 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

‘Explain How the Teleological Argument Attempts to Prove the Existence of God’

...The teleological argument also known as the design argument is a posteriori basing stuff primarily on knowledge gained from external experience. The idea being that basically due to the intricacies of the world there must be a designer. The word telos from teleological means purpose and purpose links in with Aristotle’s ideas of causality. The argument has two sides one being Aquinas’s on an argument to design and Paley’s being an argument from design. Aquinas 1224-1274 argument comes from the fifth of his five ways which is him pointing out the fact that there is evidence in the world around us of the existence of God therefore showing his Empirical knowledge. Furthermore Aquinas holds the belief that humans are always working towards something, such as knowledge (act for an end), as we strive to achieve the best outcome; meaning we do not achieve that end or outcome intentionally, instead it is for a reason. Aquinas reinforced the view that something which lacks knowledge cannot move towards an end, unless guided by a being ‘endowed with knowledge and intelligence’, therefore, this shows that there must be some intelligent being that exists, pushing humans towards a goal or an end. Aquinas concluded that this being is God. Much like Aquinas William Paley made the argument about the existence of God through an argument from design. Paley, a theologian thought of the analogy through the use of a stone and a watch. He said that if you came across a stone never having seen it...

Words: 449 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Examine How the Teleological Argument for the Existence of God Has Developed

...Examine how the Teleological Argument for the existence of God has developed. The teleological argument is the design argument for the existence of God. The name is derived from the Greek word ‘telos’ which means “end” or “purpose”. This theory speaks about things in the universe that appear to fulfil a purpose. Such design could not have occurred by chance, the only explanation has to do with references to an intelligent, personal being. This makes it an ‘a posteriori’ argument. The origin of the teleological argument dates back to the ancient Greek philosopher Plato (424-348 BCE) who believed in a pre-existent universe. He believed that the universe wasn’t created by an intelligent being which he referred to as the ‘demi-urge’. Instead his theory stated that the demi-urge did not create the universe ex nihilo, he simply developed a universe which he already existed in. For Plato, this was a rational explanation as to why there’s order in the world rather than chaos. Aristotle (384-322 BCE) who was a student of Plato also contributed to this theory. He considered that based on all that can be observed in the world and the stars above, the only explanation for all the complexity and beauty that the world contains was a divine intelligence. He believed that there was a first unmoved mover who is responsible for all order that exists. Such a God was also viewed as possessing intelligence, goodness, eternity yet remained incorporeal. St. Thomas Aquinas (13th century) adapted...

Words: 926 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Teleological Argument Has Successfully Survived All Criticisms. Discuss (10)

...In my opinion the teleological argument has not successful survived all criticisms, it has actually not survived any of the criticisms. I believe this because the criticisms either attack the observation, the logic, the idea of god or all three and without all three the argument collapses. For example one criticism from Hume which is that there is a lot of evidence (such as natural disasters) to suggest that the world was poorly designed therefore how can a God who is meant to be all powerful and omni-benevolent have designed it. This is an extremely successful criticism because it is attacking the idea of god, also challenging the observation of the teleological argument which stated that our world is so complex and perfectly designed. This destroys the argument because if the world is not perfect then God (the perfect being) could not have designed the world because this means God is not God because he’s wouldn't be omni-benevolent, therefore there’s a possibility that the world is just here by chance. In addition criticism made by Fleu attacks the most important part of the teleological argument and any argument which is the logic. He points out that the argument is circular, the premise assumes the conclusion. The premise that there is evidence of a design, assumes that because of that there must be a designer, and then goes further onto wrongly again assuming that the designer has to be God. Showing that the argument is just a bunch of assumptions that could easily be...

Words: 419 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Teleological Argument

...The Teleological argument was first developed by ancient Greek and Indian philosophers, for the explanation of the beginning/end to the existence in the world. Leading to a grand designer of the world. Philosopher and Christian apologist William Paley had resurrected the teleological argument in there being a grand designer of the world, thus arguing the existence of God. Paley uses certain items to compare and question them to the argument, to why this certain thing may have appeared to the individual, or to how it had started like everything else in the world. Thus leading to one grand designer to it all, God or inferring it to an infinite designer if there may or may not be one. Paley's begins to develop his argument by mentioning of him stubbing his foot against a stone, and start to ask how did it become to be there? or had it laid there "forever"?. He then mentions his finding of a watch on the ground and begins to observes the watch. Its form and the motion it had created by the points, pointing towards the hour of the day. As well its shape is different from its parts. Paley...

Words: 447 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

David Hume

...Explain Hume’s criticisms of the teleological argument. (25) St. Thomas Aquinas’s teleological argument seeks to prove, a posteriori, the existence of an intelligent God by arguing that the world is full of inanimate, non-intelligent natural bodies which function in order, in an intelligent way. He said that for inanimate bodies to do this, they require an intelligent being to bring this action about. This being is God. The 18th-century philosopher David Hume wrote a book named Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion in which he criticised Aquinas’s teleological argument, and several other teleological arguments. Firstly, Hume says that the apparent intelligent functioning of many unintelligent bodies – e.g., the complex systems by which plants take up minerals from the soil to cause water uptake into their roots – can be explained by the ideas of natural selection and survival of the fittest, by which the organisms that happen by chance mutations to be most well-adapted to their environments are the ones which survive to reproduce, making their functions appear to be ordered specifically for their environments and therefore seeming designed. Therefore, apparent design may well not be in fact design. Hume uses this idea to criticise the major premise of Aquinas’s teleological argument. Hume also asserts that the world does not necessarily point to an intelligent designer. He uses the apparent cruelty often observed in nature – said to be “red in tooth and claw” – to argue...

Words: 774 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Gbghrthh

...believe that: (God and the afterlife exist ) SECTION III: Clarify Your Belief and Position: (10 /10) A Supreme Being: (Maximum 200 words) I am a theist and I believe that God exists. One key reason why is because my mom has raised me to believe that there is a God since I was a baby, I have been to church multitudes of times and also have read the bible many times so naturally I am going to believe that he is real. Yes my mom “raised me in the church” but that’s not the only reason I believe in God though, I believe because after observing and living life on this planet for the past 20 years I have came to my own conclusion God exists. I feel life it self is too far too complex and diverse for there not to be one (The Teleological Argument). Just like how we know a car or a skyscraper was created by people because of the complexity of the creation so is the same logic I use when I defend the existence of God, after taking biology this year it only made my belief in a God stronger by learning how life on earth works, from my point of view It really amazes me how people think that there is no God. The Afterlife: (Maximum 200 words) I am a theist and I believe that there is an after life. I am a firm Believer in God so naturally that would make me a firm believer in the after life as well. Proving that the after life is real is a very difficult thing to do but, I believe one of the biggest pieces of evidence that there is a life after this one is of all the testimony...

Words: 1667 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Test

...graduate of an elite private school on the Upper East Side of Manhattan"? a. Studies show that Blacks and Hispanics students as a whole score lower than whites students on standardized testing. Sandel mentions that for whatever reason there is a testing gap. To utilize standardized testing to predict academic success would require the interpretation of the students’ academic scores and to include the family’s social, culture and educational background. Sandel states that the A 700 score for a student who attended poor public schools in the South Bronx has more meaning than that of a student from an Upper East Side of Manhattan. 2. What is the essence of Richard Dworkin's argument in support of affirmative action university admissions policies? b. Dworkin’s idea of the supporting argument on affirmative action in relations to the universities admission policies is stated that possibly the right at stake should be based according to academic criteria alone. The fact of being good at football, or coming from Idaho, or having volunteered in a soup kitchen. Dworkin views the facts of grades, test scores, and other measures of academic promise land me in the top group of applicants, therefore I should be admitted. One should be considered based on academic merit alone. 3. What does it mean to sever the idea of "moral desert" from our notions of what constitutes justice?  Would this be helpful? c. Severing the idea of “moral desert” signifies that our nation...

Words: 504 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Design Argument

...DESIGN (TELEOLOGICAL) ARGUMENTS Design arguments are empirical, a posteriori and synthetic Telos = end/purpose Arguments state that order design purpose God William Paley – the divine watchmaker * This is an argument from analogy * If one came across a stone on a hill, one would conclude that it was there naturally. However, if one came across a watch, one would assume that it was not there naturally. * This is because the watch is complex, harmonious, planned, functional and purposeful * We would say that such a watch must have an intelligent designer. * The universe is similar – there are many different parts that work together harmoniously and in an apparently purposeful way. It is also complex, self-sufficient and interdependent * Therefore we should assume that the universe has an intelligent designer – God * However, arguably the universe is more akin to a stone than a watch – how can nature itself stick out as something unnatural? * Hume – the world is dissimilar to a watch, and so because the effect is different, we cannot infer the same cause * Also, this argument assumes that there is purpose to the universe, even though there is no evidence as such. * There is much disorder in the world due to natural disasters and wars, unlike a watch * If the universe is flawed, this implies that the creator was flawed. God is supposed to be perfect. * This analogy also anthropomorphises God by...

Words: 981 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Design Argument

...The Design Argument is also known as the Teleological Argument coming from the Greek word ‘telos’ meaning end/purpose. It is an “a posteriori” argument (from experience) based on empirical evidence (based on the 5 senses). It is synthetic (from observation) and is inductive (there are a number of possible conclusions although one may be more probable). The Design Argument states that the universe has order, purpose, regularity and suitability for human life (Sarah Tyler). Complexities of the universe demonstrate some form of design. The design requires a designer. Therefore, for many, the designer is God of the Classical Theism (Hereafter referred to as God). This argument was first introduced by Socrates, a Greek philosopher, showing that the argument is strong as it has survived the test of time as we are still discussing it in the 21st century so the argument has merit and displays longevity. “With such signs of forethought in the design of living creatures, how can there be doubt that they are the work of choice or design” cited by Socrates. There is an early belief that there is design in the world. In the 13th century, Thomas Aquinas furthered the design argument through his book, Summa Theologica. He proposed 5 ways to prove the existence of God; one of which was the Teleological argument. For Aquinas, these arguments point to a being “that we call God”. To prove the existence of god, he used the analogy of the archer, arrow and target to show that there must be...

Words: 1615 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Does God Exist?

...Does God Exist The Debate held at Biola University on whether or not the existence of God is true was illuminating. William Lane Craig had an abundance of supporting evidence to reinforce his argument. Craig approached his argument from not only a theist’s standpoint but from Philosopher’s standpoint as well, which made his speech clear and concise. The existence of God has been brought into question because of atheistic views. Whether or not God exists depends on a person’s definition of God. Dr. Craig states that contingent things should have an explanation for their existence, the universe is a contingent so therefore the reasoning behind how the universe exists is God. He expressed a total of five arguments to defend this claim and they are the following: the cosmological argument, teleological argument, fine-tuning argument, the resurrection of God, and finally religious experience. Given the premise presented by Dr. Craig, there is no question that god exists because everything presented on earth is essentially a creation and behind every masterpiece is an artist. On the other side of the debate, Christopher Hitchens states that there is no good reason that supports the existence of god because all arguments for god can be explained without god. The atheistic view can be described as a person who believes that there is no evidence for supernatural forces. Hitchens’s premise states this because you do not need god as a reason for why things happen in life I for one...

Words: 507 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Response Paper

...them and see what proof that they can show to state as to why they think that way. Then there are some that believes that there is a God but does not believe in all that is said that he had done. McCloskey stated in page 62 that, “Philosopher colleagues attribute to much importance to the role of the proofs of the existence of God as a basis for religious belief, that most theists does not come to believe in God as a result of reflecting on the proofs, but come to religion as a result of other reasons and factors.” (McCloskey, 1968) McCloskey used three arguments to support his claims; these three arguments are cosmological argument, teleological argument, and Argument from design. McCloskey had went on speaking about the cosmological argument and about the universe. McCloskey was more into the idea of a big bang. This can be broken down into three ideas from Evans and Manis on their non-temporal form of cosmological argument. The first one is the contingent beings meaning that there is a lot of evidence proving that a powerful being like God exists but there is no real reason as to why God or the universe does exists. The second one is that there are no claims about how old the universe is so this would lead to that the "universe may have always existed." (Evans&Manis, 2009, p. 69) God origin...

Words: 1979 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Just Joining

...Reply Paper to H.J. McCloskey’s Essay: On Being An Atheist H.J McCloskey makes many bold statements in opposition to the most common arguments for theism. To say the least, his bias shows through, even to the point of not seeing the deeper picture. He makes claims against the cosmological and teleological arguments. He then makes a point on how evil speaks against the existence of God. He then concludes with a statement that may or may not be supported by these statements (McCloskey, 1968). The Cosmological Argument McCloskey makes some statements about the necessity of a being that created the universe. He also makes some points about how this being cannot be perfect The Necessarily Existent Being It is amazing how people will require one set of standards for themselves, yet another set of standards for others. This is exemplified in the paper that is presented by H.J McCloskey. He States that proof is required for belief in a god (McCloskey, 1968, p. 51). But he also wants to believe in an origin of the universe in which a bunch of something without origin explodes to create hundreds of thousands of galaxies. Mr. McCloskey wishes to say that one must have proof before they believe. What Mr. McCloskey is not saying is that it would take proof to convince him not to believe in the manner he does. Mr. McCloskey has a belief system which serves his purposes. He has chosen a system that does not have enough solid defeaters to pull it apart. This allows Mr. McCloskey to settle...

Words: 2451 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Design Argument Revision Notes

...The Argument for Design Background • Also known as teleological argument from Greek ‘telos’ meaning ‘goal or purpose’ • A posteriori – the DA claims there is evidence of design in the world and so relies on external empirical evidence for its proof. • Inductive argument. • Arguments for design go back at least as far as the Greek philosopher Plato [428-347 B.C.] • Some distinguish between ‘qua regularity’ and ‘qua purpose’, meaning that some DA’s argue on the basis of there being regularity in the Universe whilst others claim there is evidence of the Universe being designed for a purpose. • Three main types of argument are: From order [regularity] From beauty Anthropic [purpose] William Paley [1743-1805] in Natural Theology: Evidences of The Existence and Attributes of the Deity [1805] • Makes use of analogy and likens the complexity of a watch to the complexity of the Universe. Since a watch is clearly designed, so is the Universe [qua regularity]. Also, the human eye is too complex to have arisen by chance so must be designed for some purpose [qua purpose] • Hume [1711-1776] in Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and An Inquiry Concerning Human Understanding put forward a number of criticisms of the DA before Paley published his work: • Design and order could be the result of chance [the Epicurean hypothesis] • Hume believed the analogy on which the DA is based is unsound...

Words: 1083 - Pages: 5