我被这部电影深深地说服了。原因如下：首先，这个电影讲述了一个真实的，完全不同于我所生活的环境的故事。这个故事能够从很多方面感动我，妇女们的无奈，社会的腐败和孩子们的无助，孩子们的命运。其中孩子的命运是这个故事主要所描述的。从故事背景来看，那些妇女们所受到的苦难就是孩子们的以后的生活的真实写照。故事不单单讲的是妇女的苦难，同时，孩子们的苦难是导演最想要表达的方面我觉得。第二，导演对于故事描述的视角也是这部电影说服我的方面。在这个电影中，强烈的反差是以孩子们的视角描述了他们的理想中的生活与现实的生活的对比。这是电影中一直想要表达给观众的观点，我认为。

I was deeply persuaded by the film. First of all, this film tells a true; a totally different story from the environment which I am living. I was moved by the story by many ways, women's helpless, corruption of the society and children's fate. Child’s fate is main point filmmakers want to deliver audiences in the story. From the background, women project children’s future who are living in Calcutta's Red Light area. The story is not just talking about women’s suffering, children's suffering is the most important thing the director want to deliver I think. Secondly, Directors’ angle of the story is the most important reason why this movie persuades me. According whole film, a strong contrast can tell which is based on the children’s dream lives and real lives.
不生硬的在影片中加入旁白、采访、对话，导演而是作为一个演员，或者更准确来说作为真实生活在孩子们当中的人，引导事件发展。导演没有直接拉开摄像机与孩子们的距离，简单的背景介绍并没有给人一种采访的感觉，反而像是人物在对话一样真实自然。而孩子们照片的介绍，更不是简单生切，导演用流畅的镜头运动展现了照片的含义，从局部细节到照片全景，从左边角落的人物的脸到右面拥挤的街道，孩子的照片就是生活的一部分，不夸张不造作，就是生活。

Directors don’t put narratages, interviews, and dialogues optionally. The directors were acting as guides during the film; they were more precisely act real people among the children’s lives. They were guiding whole film. Directors were not directly put any distance between the camera and children. A simple background description doesn't give people a feeling like interview, but it is true and nature thing which likes characters’ dialogues. And the children photos, more is not a simple cut, director with smooth lens movement shows the meaning of the picture, from local to the panoramic photo details, from the left corner of the