Premium Essay

The Aspects of Right to Counsel

In: Other Topics

Submitted By donnasuto
Words 1171
Pages 5
The Aspects of Right to Council
Donna Chupurdia
CJA/364
July 16, 2012
John Hullar

The Aspects of Right to Council
The Sixth Amendment was ratified on December 15th, 1791, guarantees the accused the right to council in federal cases (Adams, 2012). The Fourteenth Amendment extends the right to council in all state and federal cases. The role of an attorney is to represent to the best of their ability and defend the rights of their client. Defense attorneys are sworn to defend the accused regardless of their presumed guilt or innocence (Mathewson, 2009). Prosecuting attorneys must bring forth the evidence and present it to a jury of their peers (Mathewson, 2009).
A prosecuting attorney must prove their case; the defense attorney must try to dis-prove what the evidence and the prosecuting attorney bring out in court. The majority of cases get pled out because the courts in America are bogged down with too many cases. Additionally, a defense attorney’s case load is usually quite full and especially if they work for the state they reside in, which would make them public defenders.
Public defenders are paid by each state as well as district attorneys and prosecutors, but their functions, and responsibilities are much different. The district attorney and the public defender may seem as though they are in ‘cahoots’, but they are not; in fact that are adversaries. They may have a good work relationship and especially if they are in the same courtroom working together for months at a time, but public defenders commit to their work and their clients just as much as a private criminal defense attorney (LexisNexis, 2012).
When a person gets arrested they are read their Miranda rights, which state a person’s rights to an attorney whether he or she can afford one or not. If they cannot afford an attorney, the accused cannot choose his or her lawyer because they are

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Counsel

...University of Phoenix Material Right to Counsel Determining the right to counsel depends on the circumstances of a case. For this assignment, you have three options to choose from to demonstrate what you have learned about the right to counsel. Select and complete one of the following assignments: Option 1: Right to Counsel Presentation Option 2: Right to Counsel Attorney Interview Option 3: Right to Counsel Article Option 1: Right to Counsel Presentation Analyze two cases involving right to counsel and document your observations in a 7- to 10-slide Microsoft® PowerPoint® presentation with detailed speaker notes. Use complete sentences, with correct grammar and punctuation, to fully explain each slide as if you were giving an in-person presentation. Address the following topics: • The aspects of right to counsel for the cases • How the historical development of right to counsel relates to the cases • When the right to counsel attaches to criminal procedure for the cases • Whether the defendants in the cases exercised their right to self-representation • The role of the attorneys in the cases as it applies to right to counsel Include videos, audio, photos, diagrams, or graphs as appropriate. Format your presentation consistent with APA guidelines. Option 2: Right to Counsel Attorney Interview Research one case involving right to counsel using the Internet or University Library. Analyze the case and identify...

Words: 514 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Gideon V Wainwright Case Summary

...Amendment rights of the defendants were violated by the trial courts. Powell v. Alabama was significant in multiple aspects. It established the precedent that not only must a lawyer be assigned but the court, but that that lawyer must also provide effective counsel to the defendant. The Supreme Court recognized that a counsel who never meets with the defendant is not providing the legal representation to the defendant that was the intent of the framers of the Constitution. The second precedent that I think it set, even it if was not intended, is that all persons accused of a crime are entitled to...

Words: 596 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Aspects of Cases

...Aspects of Cases, Was It Justified? Jeremie Rancier National American University Abstract When juveniles are being questioned there are concerns to worry about. They have rights just as an adult does, however these rights should be within limits. The rights of having legal counsel should always be given. The thing about this could be that what is considered legal counsel. Can a parent be considered or even a probation officer? They aren’t technically attorneys and can’t really be considered legal counsel. The only thing that can be considered is a guardian who is responsible for them. This can be a difficult decision and can end up be controversial. Aspects of Cases, Was It Justified? In the cases of Fare v. Michael C. and California v. Prysock you have juvenile who is being questioned about murder. They were both brought in and given the option to have a attorney present if they chose to or not. They both however decline to have any legal representation brought in and answered questions about the alleged crime. After making statements that incriminated him in the case he tried to say that he was denied to see his probation officer before be questioned which he thought was his right. Fare v. Michael C1 In Fare v. Michael C the respondent was brought to be questioned about a murder. After being read his Miranda Rights the respondent requested to have his probation officer present. The police denied his request and he agreed to be questioned. The court however...

Words: 906 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Right to Counsel

...Right to Counsel Yolette T. Pepe Kaplan University Introduction to Law LS102-03 Prof Young February 15, 2011 Right to Counsel The root of all American laws are found in English law. In England, people who were charged with felonies had no right to hire a private attorney, though it was allowed sometimes in special circumstances. After the Glorious Revolution in 1688, Parliament passed a law allowing people accused of treason the right to be represented by an attorney at trial, but this right did not extend to any other classes of crime. (Find Law, 2010) All the way up until 1836, with the passage of the Prisoners' Counsel Act, this right was denied to people charged with nearly all serious crimes in England. The development of the common-law principle in England had denied to anyone charged with a felony the right to retain counsel, while the right was afforded in misdemeanor cases, a rule ameliorated in practice, however, by the judicial practice of allowing counsel to argue points of law and then generously interpreting the limits of ''legal questions.'' The colonial and early state practice in this country was varied, ranging from the existent English practice to appointment of counsel in a few States where needed counsel could not be retained. Historically, the right to counsel has meant the right to retained counsel; that is, if the defendant could afford a lawyer, he had the right to use one. (Lawyers.com, 2000) The poor defendant was denied this right. In early America...

Words: 1516 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Appellant's 6 Amendment Case

...'S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO COUNSEL WAS PROTECTED WHEN APPELLANT 'S COUNSEL WAS PRESENT DURING THE LINE-UP PROCESS AND POLICE INTERVIEW IS NOT A CRITICAL STAGE OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEEDING WITHIN THE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL GUARANTEE OF THE SIXTH AMENDMENT BECAUSE THERE IS NO FACE TO FACE CONFRONTATION The Sixth Amendment states that the accused shall enjoy the right to the assistance of counsel for his defense in all criminal procedures. However, police interview is not a critical stage in a criminal proceeding within the meaning of the Sixth Amendment rights. This section will demonstrate that the appellant's Sixth Amendment was not violated because the lineup turned into a police interview when the witness switched rooms. Police...

Words: 1871 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Due Process and Crime Control

...The Warren Court left an unprecedented legacy of judicial activism in the area of civil rights law as well as in the area of civil liberties—specifically, the rights of the accused as addressed in Amendments 4 through 8. In the period from 1961 to 1969, the Warren Court examined almost every aspect of the criminal justice system in the United States, using the 14th Amendment to extend constitutional protections to all courts in every State. This process became known as the “nationalization” of the Bill of Rights. During those years, cases concerning the right to legal counsel, confessions, searches, and the treatment of juvenile criminals all appeared on the Court's docket. The Warren Court's began with the case of Mapp v. Ohio, which was the first of several significant cases that re-evaluated the role of the 14th Amendment as it applied to state judicial systems. In a 6-3 decision, the Court overturne the conviction, and five justices found that the States were bound to exclude evidence seized in violation of the 4th Amendment. The 4th Amendment sets the standards for searches and seizures by law enforcement officials in the United States, the Court noted, and the 14th Amendment requires judges to uphold those standards in every State. Evidence gained by an illegal search became inadmissible in State courts as a result of the decision. The “Mapp Rule” has since been modified, so the exclusionary rule is no longer as absolute as when first handed down in Mapp. Critics of...

Words: 2336 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Moral Virtues

...impossible to enumerate all the moral virtues, since there can be a virtue wherever there can be a morally good habit regarding a given area of human activity, and human activities are multiple. However, theologians generally group the moral virtues around the basic cardinal virtues of prudence, justice, temperance, and fortitude. Prudence The first of the four cardinal virtues and the most important as a fulcrum for all the other moral virtues is prudence. It is a special virtue infused by God into the practical intellect for the right government of one's actions in view of the supernatural end. Prudence is the most necessary of all the moral virtues because its function is precisely to point out and command the just mean or measure in regard to any and all human actions. It enables us to judge accurately what is the morally good thing to do under particular circumstances. The importance of the virtue of prudence is especially evident in certain aspects of human life. First, it helps the individual avoid sin, pointing out through experience the causes and occasions of sin as well as the opportune remedies. Secondly, it contributes to the increase and growth of virtue, judging in each instance what should be done or avoided in view of one's sanctification. Thirdly, prudence assists greatly in the works of the apostolate, whether in the pulpit the confessional, or elsewhere. There are three acts involved in the functioning of prudence: deliberation, judgment, and execution. Eight...

Words: 3021 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Fiction Versus Reality

... versus the real deal (reality). I will select a fictional television court room drama from the court television web site to help with my research, and then I will describe the fictional portrayals of the court room, including the trial process, the roles of the prosecution and defense, the roles of the court room participants and the handling or implementation of rights for the defendant and the victim. Then, draw parallels between the fictional portrayal and the reality of the court room within above identified aspects. I will then determine the accuracy of the fictional court room process as compared to that of the court room reality. I will also explain in my opinion, Given that entertainment differs from reality, what impact would fictional account of courtroom practices have on the average citizen’s perceptions of the real-life courtroom process. There are many people that make up a reality court room like: the bailiff, Court Reporters, Prosecutor, jurors, Victim, court room assistance, defendant or defendants, the judge and the defense counsel, each one of these people plays a major role in the judicial system to make it a whole. A Bailiffs has many job description, there to assist the court in any way, may it being by transporting a inmate to and from court or just to keep the peace in the court...

Words: 1638 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Legal Ethics

...G.R. No. 100113 September 3, 1991 RENATO CAYETANO, petitioner, vs. CHRISTIAN MONSOD, HON. JOVITO R. SALONGA, COMMISSION ON APPOINTMENT, and HON. GUILLERMO CARAGUE, in his capacity as Secretary of Budget and Management, respondents. Renato L. Cayetano for and in his own behalf. Sabina E. Acut, Jr. and Mylene Garcia-Albano co-counsel for petitioner. PARAS, J.:p We are faced here with a controversy of far-reaching proportions. While ostensibly only legal issues are involved, the Court's decision in this case would indubitably have a profound effect on the political aspect of our national existence. The 1987 Constitution provides in Section 1 (1), Article IX-C: There shall be a Commission on Elections composed of a Chairman and six Commissioners who shall be natural-born citizens of the Philippines and, at the time of their appointment, at least thirty-five years of age, holders of a college degree, and must not have been candidates for any elective position in the immediately preceding -elections. However, a majority thereof, including the Chairman, shall be members of the Philippine Bar who have been engaged in the practice of law for at least ten years. (Emphasis supplied) The aforequoted provision is patterned after Section l(l), Article XII-C of the 1973 Constitution which similarly provides: There shall be an independent Commission on Elections composed of a Chairman and eight Commissioners who shall be natural-born citizens of the Philippines and, at the time of their...

Words: 13324 - Pages: 54

Free Essay

Court Assignment

...Date: 23rd Feb 2012 Judge: Mr. Justice Smart Names of Lawyers: Crown D.A. Jardine, P.M. Favell, S. Nahal Defendants Counsel for Mr. Sipes: M.K. Woodall, M.A. Nathanson, G. Ng Counsel for Mr. Podolski: R.C. Claus, M. Jetté, G. Docolas Counsel for Mr. O’Donnell: G. Orris, Q.C., C.L. Bauman Counsel for Mr. Manolakos: R.A. (Sandy) Ross, P. Doherty, A. Rinaldis Counsel for Mr. Brownell: C.R. Purves, B.L. Hickford, J. Mills Brief Summary of Trail This trail took place in Courtroom 20 in the B.C. Supreme Court where every visitor was required to pass through a security check. The case involves three homicides done 5 years ago by five members of an alleged Vernon, B.C. drug gang dubbed The Greeks (Organized crime group). The alleged gangsters are being represented by 15 lawyers, 5 more than the Crown prosecution team. Among the 5 accused, Dale Sipes, Les Podolski and Sheldon O'Donnell have been charged with the first-degree murder of Dave Marnuik and none of them have pleaded guilty. Due to the seriousness of the case and lengthy court proceedings, the trail is expected to last until July of 2012. From our observation, the lawyer represented Crown (plaintiff) began direct examination of a girl(witness) who claimed to have seen the defendants return to the apartment that she...

Words: 1372 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Ethics Paper

...that may being using the upcoming financial statements for whatever reason may be. As the facts state above, there is a reasonable chance the company is going to lose the class action suit and there is an estimate of the loss, so it would appear the ethical action would be to accrue the loss at this time. Granted, it may seem as ammunition for the opposing counsel, but ethically it is the right thing to do. As CFO, my job is at stake if financial statements are prepared with mistakes that the company is fully aware of. Camp Industries as a whole may also lose trust from their stockholders. Stockholders may also lose out on investments due to the lack of awareness of the company’s standings. Integrity of the company is at stake if management knows about a major loss and doesn’t report it on the financial statements. How are stockholders to believe reports from here on out it something as major as a $30 million loss is just “left out?” Objectivity would be demolished due to the fact that Camp Industries is merely not reporting the loss due to the fear that it could cause ammunition for opposing counsel. Whether the financials report what management wants to see or is happy to see, it should report what is actually...

Words: 763 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Interviews and Interrogations Policy Paper

...comparison and contrast between security interviews and security interrogations, the legal issues associated with security interviews and interrogations, and finally a security organization policy on conducting security interviews and interrogations. Interviewing and interrogating suspects are two important but separate vital aspects of collecting information about criminal activity. The difference between an interview and an interrogation is that security professionals conduct interviews, and law enforcement officers can conduct both. When a security officer conducts an interview, the main purpose is to collect information from individuals who may have witnessed a crime. At first, the facts are not known and the individual is not accused of a crime, and the setting is meant to be comfortable and have an open dialogue. With interrogations the goal is to obtain reliable information to provide to the prosecutor and to the judge or jury so they have an accurate account of the crime. The setting of an interrogation is formal and in a controlled environment conducted, only after the individual has been accused of a crime, and read their Miranda rights. When conducting either interviews or an interrogation, the most important thing is communication. Prior to the start of either one, the interviewee must be prepared with questions they want to ask, or other known facts about the case. Professionalism plays an important role while questioning or interviewing...

Words: 1710 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Assignment 1

...societal expectations and norms (Bagley, 2013 page 15). This set of attitudes that is value laden can mitigate the risk involved in doing business in Facebook. Violence and suffering is often continuous in a media culture. This can sometimes cause an indifference to the vision of human suffering (Chacksfield, 2009). A legally astute marketing manager can acquire the data, consumer feedback and reactions which represents moral concerns. Collaborative efforts of the marketing manager can be made to create sites that represents standards of how society’s behavior should be and drive all aspects of a management teams. The legally astute marking manager seeks legal counsel, advice, and guidance and is proactive in addressing the legal dimensions of business. All concerns should be addressed in ways that are effective, efficient, and legally permissible (Bagley, 2009, page 13). Legal advice in all aspects of the business allows a legally astute manager to be proactive as opposed to being reactive in legal issues and guidelines which allows less time for corrections and a greater emphasis on effective planning which decreases unforeseen problems. This component can mitigate the risks involved in dealing with Facebook. Facebook has a proactive approach in dealing with legal issues and regulations. Facebook has created policy and procedure which can be read and is posted for all...

Words: 1358 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Gideon Vs Wainwright

...He did everything an attorney would have done to defend him; made an opening statement, he cross-examined the prosecutions witnesses, brought in his own witnesses, and made compelling arguments to proclaim his innocence. Despite Gideon’s efforts, the judge ruled him to serve five years in prison. Gideon went and sought relief from his sentencing by filing a petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Florida Supreme Court. In his petition, Gideon claimed that the judge’s refusal to appoint an attorney to him violated his constitutional rights. No shocker, The Florida Supreme Court denied Gideon’s...

Words: 475 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Cjs/220 Week 2 Assignment

...Week 2 Assignment: Law as a “Living Body” CJS/220 The U.S. Constitution provided the structure and framework for the American rule of law that was based from the structure of England. The U.S. Constitution, which was written and accepted in 1787, has influenced the American legal system giving the American people a structure to live by, law and order. Although all American laws are constitutional, when the Constitution was written in 1787 the American culture was very new and it only catered to the majority and nobody else that was brought to the United States. As time passed the comprehension of the Constitution was changed to integrate minorities like African Americans, women, Asian Americans and others to have the same rights as White Americans. The world has changed dramatically and the U.S. has made history since the creation of the U.S. Constitution having added to it in order for the land of the free actually be the land of the free. The term “laws on the books” refers to the actual written laws passed through legislation being by state or federal and recorded in the codified law books. “Law in action” refers to how the law is actually interpreted, carried out, and applied in the courts. As far as it being fair in the justice system, well it has its pros and cons. It’s not fair when a person is singled out by police because he looks different or out of place. It’s not fair when a person gets a ticket when going to speed of traffic. It is fair that we do...

Words: 1156 - Pages: 5