...Bystander Apathy and Effect Bystander Apathy or effect would be when someone around you is a situation but you don’t do anything to help then with the situation or aren’t doing anything to stop it, you are just standing there watching it happen. The number of bystanders is greater than the number of people who will actually step up and give help during the situation. The greater number of bystanders means the less likely people will get any help throughout a situation. Bystander effect or apathy means people will not help a victim even if the situation is bad, they will just allow it to happen to not get involved with the problem (Wikipidea Contributors). On Friday the 13 in March 1964 Catherine Genovese was arriving home from work when...
Words: 741 - Pages: 3
...the influence of Bystander Effect on pro social behaviour Introduction: Kitty Genovese, a New York City woman, was stabbed to death near her home on March 13, 1964 with her neighbors witness the whole thing happen but no one called the police. This common portrayal of her neighbors as being fully aware of what was transpiring but completely unresponsive. This went on to become a psychological paradigm and an stimulus on psychologist to investigating the effect of bystanders on individuals willing of helping others. Bystander Effect refers to the tendency for individuals to be less likely to help other person in need when other bystanders are present, or believed to be present, as compared to when they are alone (VCE psychology unit 1 and 2 textbook). And pro-social behaviour is any behaviour intended to help or benefit another person, group or society. One of the classic experiments is conducted by John Darley and Bibb Latané in 1964 called Bystander Apathy Experiment to investigate the influence group size displays the probability of reactions to the incident. The aim of the current study was to conduct a series of experiments to investigate the influence of Bystander Effect on pro social behaviour. The independent variable was the the number of people that present when the accident happens. The dependent variable was the likelihood of the witnesses to help. It was predicted that the the participant aged 15 to 30 from Facebook would more likely to help when they were...
Words: 996 - Pages: 4
...Psy 110 - Asynchronous The Bystander Effect If you saw someone being attacked on the street, would you help? Many of us would quickly say yes we would help because to state the opposite would say that we are evil human beings. Much research has been done on why people choose to help and why others choose not to. The bystander effect states that the more bystanders present, the less likely it is for someone to help. Sometimes a bystander will assume that because no one else seems concerned, they shouldn't be (Senghas, 2007). Much of the research that has been done supports this definition of the bystander effect. There have also been recent situations where this effect has proven to be true. Early research of the bystander effect was done by researchers by the name of Latane’ and Darley. They studied a group of college students. The college students watched strangers on video tapes observing how they respond to someone who is choking. To my surprise they found that when the strangers thought they were the only one around 85% of them helped. When the strangers thought that there was one other person 65% of them helped. Only 31% of the strangers helped when they thought that four other people were around (Senghas, 2007). As astonishing as this research is we witness this type of disregard for other citizens everyday. A famous true story that showcases how people will ignore someone in need is the story of Kitty Genovese...
Words: 1300 - Pages: 6
...The bystander effect is an occurrence that happens as a result of cognitive and social processes combined and happens when someone chooses not to get involved with an emergency situation because the presence of others discourages them (What is bystander effect, 2015; Bystander effect, 2017). This can often be misunderstood as laziness or selfishness, although it is actually more of a misinterpretation of a situation, causing individuals to think that help is not actually needed (What is bystander effect, 2015). Moreover, the bystander effect is an occurrence that probably occurs more than most people think. For instance, young children might experience the bystander effect if they witness someone is being bullied at recess or in the halls,...
Words: 319 - Pages: 2
...Not My Problem The September 11th 2001 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center was one of the most violent events that occurred in America in the past decade. People were horrified and shocked when they first learned that one of America’s most famous buildings had been attacked. It was a day where the entire country was in a state of mourning over those individuals who lost their lives in this catastrophic attack. Ironically, Thomas Hoepker’s photograph captures a group of five individuals casually observing this tragic attack on the World Trade Center in 2001 with no display of concern or grief. These individuals appear as if they are not worried about the thousands of lives that were lost on that sad day. At first glance, the first thing that comes to one’s mind is that these five individuals appear to be desensitized to violence. However, through further analysis we learn that these individuals are not desensitized to this violence but in fact feel a different sense of responsibility to express their feelings in the presence of others. Thomas Hoepker’s photograph shows a group of five individuals under the sun in a park near Brooklyn while a dark grey cloud of smoke fills the sky behind them as a result of the two buildings being under attack. The body postures of the individuals show that they acknowledge the disaster that is occurring behind them but that they appear to ignore this violence. The woman lying on her back is shown to be very oblivious of the situation at...
Words: 1781 - Pages: 8
...On March 13, 1964 a girl, named Kitty Genovese, was stabbed to death in front of her home. There were several witnesses to the crime, none of whom responded to her cry for help. No one chose to help the young woman or call the authorities. That incident led psychologist to test the bystander effect and understand the reason, why despite the numerous witnesses, nobody took the initiative to help the victim (Explorable.com, 2015). The bystander effect is a psychological phenomenon referring to cases where a victim is less likely to receive help when surrounded by a group of people, rather than a single bystander. When people are in a crowd it is easier to evade responsibility and expect someone else to take it. Helping someone in need could potentially be inconvenient, risky, embarrassing even (Milgram & Hollander, 1964). That is the reason why many people choose not to react and let someone else deal with the victim....
Words: 472 - Pages: 2
...The bystander Effect (literally the passer-by effect) can be define as the dispersion of responsibility that can occur during an emergency when people are in a group. The first Study about this effect took place after the murder, in March 1964, of Catherine Genovese (aka Kitty). On her way home one evening after work, she was stabbed to death and then raped in front of her house. This murder caused quite a stir, and it turned out there were at least 38 witnesses present or at least nearby. Of these 38 witness, nobody did anything to help the young woman. A few years later some social psychologists, John Darley and Bibb Latane waged a research called “Bystander Intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility” about why none of the witnesses...
Words: 462 - Pages: 2
...Human beings have certain behavioral patterns in certain situations. In many situations, people who are in need do not get the help and support they need. People passes victim by but do nothing to help. How can human beings watch other human beings in pain and do nothing. Why do not people help? Witnesses just watch what is going on. People are attracted to violence. People ought to do what everyone else is doing. People think if everyone else is not reacting why should they react? Human beings are likely to respond to a victim in distress or someone who is experiencing trauma in accordance with the Bystander Effect and Wound Culture. First, The Bystander Effect occurs when other people interviewing an emergency situations. In “Why People...
Words: 470 - Pages: 2
...According to Barkin, Dorothy in "The Bystander Effect" people can acct effectively in emergency situations by understanding the bystander. A lot of situation people needed help, but these situations didn't look serious like a husband and wife yelling at each other, Too many don’t involve because they think that it’s an emergency, and others scare to involve. Involving in emergency situations is a psychological behavior that push people to help others and be more responsible, and to understand these facts, it will help to learn the behavior of helping others in emergency situations. Research find out that a few people involved when a crime happened in a parking lot, and a lot of people ignored the problems. In another situation when a young...
Words: 258 - Pages: 2
...Discuss the Social Psychology of the Bystander Effect Name Grade Course Tutor’s Name Date Introduction The bystander effect is a social psychological sensation that alludes to cases in which people don't offer any method for help to a victimized person when other individuals are available. The likelihood of assistance is contrarily identified with the amount of bystanders. At the end of the day, the more noteworthy the amount of bystanders, the more improbable it is that any of them will offer assistance. A few variables help to clarify why the bystander effect happens. These variables include: ambiguity, cohesiveness and diffusion of responsibility. The bystander effect was initially showed in the laboratory by John Darley and Bibb Latané in 1968 after they got to be intrigued by the subject after the homicide of Kitty Genovese in 1964. These researchers dispatched an arrangement of experiments that brought about one of the strongest and most replicable impacts in social brain science, Bibb Latané and Judith Rodin (1969). In a common examination, the member is either alone or among a gathering of different members or confederates. A crisis circumstance is arranged and researchers measure to what extent it takes the members to mediate, in the event that they intercede. These experiments have discovered that the vicinity of others restrains helping, often by an extensive edge. Case in point, Bibb Latané and Judith Rodin (1969)...
Words: 3264 - Pages: 14
...Bystander Apathy Experiment Bystander Apathy Experiment (1968) On March 13, 1964, Kitty Genovese was attacked and stabbed by a man later identified as Winston Moseley. Despite Genovese’s cries for help, none of the people in the nearby apartment building who heard her cries called police to report the incident. The attack first began at 3:20 AM, but it was not until 3:50 AM that someone first contacted police. In 1968, John Darley and Bibb Latane became intrigued by the incident and decided to conduct an experiment which was given the name the Bystander Apathy Experiment. Their main goal was to figure out why people, in cases like Genovese’s, did not come for help. These two psychologists asked volunteers to participate in a discussion which was claimed to be extremely personal. Each individual was separated in different rooms and had to communicate with each other through an intercom. During this “extremely personal” conversation, one of the members would fake an epileptic seizure through the intercom. When the volunteer believed that he/she was the only other person in the discussion, 85% left the room and began to seek help for the individual with a fake seizure. Next, the two psychologists decided to see what would happen if three or four people were in this discussion, instead of just one; and just as they suspected, only 31% went to look for help once the seizure began. So what exactly is the bystander effect? Psychologists predict there are two major factors that...
Words: 341 - Pages: 2
...Helping Behavior Social psychologists study the circumstances in which people offer help to others. The Bystander Effect Research shows that people are less likely to offer help to someone in distress if other people are also present. This is called the bystander effect. The probability that a person will receive help decreases as the number of people present increases. Diffusion of responsibility contributes to the bystander effect. A person does not feel as responsible for helping someone if several others are also present, since responsibility is distributed among all those present. Influences on Helping Researchers have proposed that bystanders who witness an emergency will help only if three conditions are met: • They notice the incident. • They interpret the incident as being an emergency situation. • They assume responsibility for helping. Researchers suggest that people are most likely to help others in certain circumstances: • They have just seen others offering help. • They are not in a hurry. • They share some similarities with the person needing help. • They are in a small town or a rural setting. • They feel guilty. • They are not preoccupied or focused on themselves. • They are happy. • The person needing help appears deserving of help. Reasons for Helping Others Some social psychologists use the social exchange theory to explain why people help others. They argue that people help each other because they want to gain as...
Words: 363 - Pages: 2
...Assignment 2 In the 1950′s a psychology professor, Solomon Asch, conducted a study too see if the power of Group Dynamics would affect the decision of an individual. In the Asch Paradigm, a group of people was told to identify which line was the longest, shortest or the same as a reference line. Before the participant could answer, he had to listen to the responses of 5 or 7 actors, and sometimes as many as 15 actors. The actors were told in advance whether to answer correctly or incorrectly to the questions. This was the independent variable or what Asch controlled. Some rounds or trials the answers from the actors were correct, but many times their responses were deliberately wrong answers. This was intentional, but the participant was completely unaware of the deception. Each participant had no way of knowing the outcome. Professor Asch wanted to see how the group of actors, or more specifically, how they answered the questions, would influence the behavior of the participants. Asch thought that most of the participants would not give an incorrect answer to something so obviously wrong just because the actors did. However, the results would prove Asch wrong. The dependent variable was seen in whether the participants conformed to what the actors said. Results proved that the majority of participants conformed on 37% of the so-called trials. About 25%, or roughly one-fourth of participants, did not conform on any trial. Three-fourths...
Words: 1019 - Pages: 5
...pantry designed to help others. My behavior was altruistic. Why? My act was voluntarily to help needy families with no expectation of a reward in any form, except perhaps a feeling of having done a good deed. Prosocial behavior ranges over a continuum from the most selfless acts of altruism to helpful acts that are motivated entirely by self-interest (Taylor, Peplau, Sears, 2006). The fact that I was directly gaining a tax deduction for my charitable donation did not affect my feelings about the behavior. My empathic concern motivated me to help the families in need. Because the goal of empathic concern is to enhance the welfare of someone else, it provides an altruistic motive for helping (Taylor, Peplau, Sears, 2006). Bystander intervention is the technical term for helping a...
Words: 583 - Pages: 3
...If a bystander does not speak up are they guilty of the action that happens? In Wiesel's Nobel Prize acceptance speech(Wiesel), and Black Like Me (Griffin) you can see the difference a bystander may or make. If you are a bystander and watch something happen without speaking up then you are responsible for that action. Even if it means putting your life in danger it is a bystander's duty to speak up, as it gives the victim hope where they thought it could never be found. No one can know what the victim is going through until they try to understand it for themselves, “You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view--until you climb around in his skin and walk around in it.” (Lee 39) You may think you know...
Words: 514 - Pages: 3
