Free Essay

The Concept of Being Evil

In: English and Literature

Submitted By sophkong
Words 947
Pages 4
The Concept of Being Evil

Today, we are constantly affected by evil like criminality, sickness and so on, which all leads to a general lack of trust in everyone and everything. To define and categorize the different extents of evil, there are two concepts: natural and moral evils. Natural evils like natural disasters or cancer are forcing us to live with the fact that it is out of our hands and there is nothing we can do to conquer it. Moral evils are different both in what kind of actions and also in how we are looking at the responsible persons. These actions are for instance murder and other types of criminality where you have defied what is ethically correct. A lot of people are under the impression that it is only bad and evil persons, who commit evil actions meaning they do not own a single likeable quality like compassion or charity. But does being the hero or, if you need to see it in a more human aspect, being a person admired for its tolerance, sympathy and humanity necessarily exclude the opportunity or more likely the risk of being evil?

We live in a world where everyone pursuits the perfect life with wealth and happiness while the way of getting it often requires a struggle that affects others negatively. We know that stress and anger easily can urge for even the happiest and most sympathetic man alive. But according to what we have influenced for instance from the fairy tales of our childhood or even the real classics like Shakespeare, being evil and being likeable are two separate things, which will never be anything but conflicting poles. Richard III claims that his incapability of being able to love and be someone’s lover determines his therefore villainous behaviour. Being born before term, Richard III had to live his life as a cripple and therefore an outcast. This was not a thing to easily let go in the Middle Ages as people was condescending towards people who had working barriers and you were seen at as incompetent. Even as Richard was the son of the Duke of York it made no difference. It corroded Richard’s self-esteem and made him think that no one would ever love him. Furthermore, he made himself believe that he would never be able to be someone’s lover as he was physically not capable of it: “And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover, to entertain these fair well-spoken days, I am determined to prove a villain”. According to this quote, Richard claims that since he cannot be a lover, he must become a villain as it is the only way to make him feel better and to make up for all the spiteful treatment he has suffered from and been through. But is becoming evil the only way out when you have been denied happiness by others? Is it even possible to reach success and happiness by executing evilness and your only thing to do is conquer everybody else?

In Shakespeare’s play, Richard III became the epitome of villainy. Therefore, his character is quite exaggerated when discussing the boundary line between being a hero or a villain on a human level. The same boundary line between good and bad is fair to say only common in literature as it is only natural as a human to have the ability of loving and giving love even though you have done things in your past that would mark you as evil. It does not necessarily characterise you as a villain, who is more likely seen as a stereotype in literature because of its carrying evil personality. Further, the villain plays a big and very important part in literature, as every story needs the excitement that the contrast between the protagonist and the antagonist makes. The conflict between the hero and the villain build the conflict of the story and therefore, the two becomes dichotomies.

Although, this does not signify that they cannot differ from the definition. It is seen in literature that the villainous character has romantic feelings for the heroic one. In such case, the villain has been provided with heroic characterization in spite of the otherwise evil personality. Often in these cases, the villain protects the hero and will not let anything get to harm him or her, which otherwise is a sign of weakness in a villain’s world.
In the light of this discussion, it is clear that the dichotomy between being a hero or a villain does not apply in our real world, as it is a whole other mind set than in literature that obtain for the human way of thinking. The human being is able to make mistakes and commit bad things without it marks you as a villain who is in no possession of any good and loving characteristics. In literature, there are no boundaries and only your imagination will draw the lines. The only thing that matters in literature is making the story interesting and as mentioned, it is the significant boundary line between the hero and the villain that builds up the excitement. When Shakespeare has made Richard III announcing his need to become a villain because of his lack of love, it is exaggerated for the sake of the play. In real life, he would have weak spots that would characterise him as a good man because this is in our nature. Therefore, the sharp line between good and bad only applies in literature and there are even varied purposes. Ergo, being evil in all your actions is not possible, as your natural need for love will appear sooner or later.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Argument Against God

...December 11, 2013 Writing Assignment Argument Against God For the concept I chose Nagel’s argument against god. Nagel claims that because evil exists it indicates that God must not exist. Premise one states that God is all knowing, all-powerful, and all good. This portrays God as a being that could see, oppose, and destroy Evil with ease, but that isn’t the case, Evil is still in existence. Premise two expands off the claim that God is all-powerful, meaning that God could eliminate all Evil, but he hasn’t. Premise three demonstrates the claim that God is all knowing; therefore he is aware of all Evil. Premise four explains how God is all good meaning that He opposes all things Evil. Premise five claims that Evil is still found throughout God’s world. Thus supporting the conclusion that God cannot exist if Evil is still in existence, which it is. In my opinion, I find Nagel’s argument to be extremely compelling and one hundred percent possible. The idea that God is a being whole is all knowing, all-powerful, and all good suggests that he would create the best possible world. There are various examples that I found to be effective but the idea of a hole in a t-shirt, I found to be simplest and most understandable that demonstrates the inability for God to exist. Although this might be true and God may not exist I have a different outlook. If Evil did not exist what purpose would God serve? He is the protector of Evil and justifies all that is good, but with no bad would good even...

Words: 803 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Response Paper

...McCloskey, a renowned philosopher in the mid 20th century, wrote a provocative article in 1968 titled, “On Being an Atheist”. McCloskey argues for atheism as the preferred and better belief system based upon his refutation of the theistic arguments. He argues against the existence of God by attempting to refute the cosmological and teleological arguments; as well he endeavours to discredit a God based upon the presence of evil. In doing this, he extends the boundaries for arguing God, whilst opening the floor to debate free will and the apparent comfort of the atheistic belief system. However, through careful analysis of the arguments for God, and an insight into the mysterious free will that God has given man; we see that a theistic belief is logically more sound and preferred. McCloskey says that the proofs for the argument of God cannot definitively establish a case for the existence of God. Therefore, all those proofs for God cannot be used in the logical argument for a God. However, McCloskey didn’t recognize the three aspects when approaching the question: does God exist. Through these three studies, we are shown that though no one person can empirically prove the existence of God, He in fact still exists (Foreman, Lesson 18). The three aspects to approaching the question of God are: best explanations approach, cumulative case approach, and the minimalistic concept of God. The best explanations aspect refers to the existence of God as the best way of explaining the effects...

Words: 1875 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Theodicy

...theodicy in response to the unfortunate, painful, evil events and circumstances found in our world. A theodicy is necessary only if we believe in a God who is inherently good, thus requiring an explanation of the apparent discontinuity between a good God and evil in the world. In order to express my own theodicy, I will discuss the forms of evil in the world and their various manifestations as well as whether or not creation as a whole is a “good” expression of the creator God. I will also discuss how eschatology affects our view of evil and God’s part in allowing or interfering with evil. Finally, I will discuss which theodicy I find most complete and why, as well as some of the strengths and weaknesses of my own theodicy. Evil in the World Expressing a theodicy requires a basic understanding of evil which can be referred to in light of that expression. The problem of evil has been dealt with in three separate classifications during our class time and reading; moral, natural and gratuitous evil. Moral evil is an evil event or circumstance caused by a human. Examples of moral evil would be murder, lying, stealing and greed. Moral evil results as the consequence of the decisions made by human beings exerting their free will. War, oppression and slavery are prime examples of moral evil perpetrated by human beings. Natural evil includes the pain and suffering resulting from the forces of nature or the actions of humans. Natural evil can be found associated with weather events such...

Words: 1951 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

On the Origin of Evil

...On the Origin of Evil Where does evil come from? This is a question that I find most interesting. In our modern day civilization educated by liberal institutions everybody speaks as if they are certain of what evil is. So what is it? At first glance the thing that sticks out to me when I hear this question is: Asking where evil comes from is like asking where hunger comes from. Where does the desire for procreation, for sexual reproduction come from? Is a lion evil? I am sure it could be viewed as such in the eyes of a gazelle. Lions kill other lions indiscriminately. They will kill young and old alike in competition for food, mates, or territory. Should every creature have the disposition of a humble lamb? Is a human being killing another human being evil? What if it’s a matter of self-defense? What if one acquires glory or good fortune for oneself and one’s people by killing? King David rose to glory and won the battle for the Israelites by killing Goliath. As stated in 1 Samuel, “Saul has slain his thousands and David his tens of thousands” (ch.18 v.7: via Bible gateway.com) Israel’s prosperity was only made possible because King David was a masterful warrior king that won many battles. Likewise war and conquest played a vital role in the founding of our country. And we became an economic superpower because of the good fortunes that came as a consequence of World War II. In this light killing could be viewed as a good thing. Accordingly things are only good or bad depending...

Words: 1869 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Essay On Psychopathy In Babies

...The answer is in their DNA and brain activity. “Brain scans revealed that psychopathy in criminals was associated with decreased connectivity between the amygdala , a subcortical structure of the brain that processes negative stimuli and the ventromedial prefrontal cortex” (Brogaard). Psychopaths who are people just like others had brain development that was unusual which triggered the “evil” that is in each and every one of us already to react. “..the Minnesota Twin Study is a project originally led by Minnesota Professor of Psychology Thomas Joseph Bouchard, Jr. The Minnesota twin study has shown that psychopathy is 60 percent heritable” (Brogaard). Psychopaths who commit murder and other evil acts are born naturally selfish and greedy that there isn't anything that can be done about it because it is heritable in their genes and abnormal brain development. Many disclaim this concept because it would give an easy getaway to criminal’s actions, but in general many scientists agree with this...

Words: 1496 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Essay About Evil And Suffering

...Q) The problem of evil, why people suffer and how to deal with it. It is the sort of thing religion was invented for. Discuss this statement. INTRODUCTION The existence of evil and suffering in our world seems to pose a serious challenge to belief in the existence of a perfect God. If God was all-knowing, it seems that God would know about all of the horrible things that happen in our world. If God was all-powerful, God would be able to do something about all of the evil and suffering. Furthermore, if God were morally perfect, then surely God would want to do something about it. And yet we find that our world is filled with countless instances of evil and suffering. These facts about evil and suffering seem to conflict with the orthodox theist...

Words: 891 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Coexistence Of Good And Evil In The Dark Knight

...The Coexistence of Good and Evil “Where there is much light, the shadow is deep” (Johann Wolfgang von Goethe). This quote can be interpreted as a metaphor for the fact that good, the light, cannot exist without evil, the shadow. This is shown in Christopher Nolan’s film “The Dark Knight” in which, the protagonist Batman attempts to defend the City of Gotham from his rival, The Joker. This film proves that good and evil must always co-exist. Good and evil are subjective terms; the concept of being virtuous is a matter of perspective. Batman is considered to be the hero of the film, but one could argue that The Joker is the true, misunderstood, hero. At the beginning of the film, The Joker robs a bank and kills his crew members, which is a violent crime justified with good intent. The bank he robbed was operated by a mafia, and by causing this destruction, he was able to draw the mafia members out of hiding, and decrease the crime rate in Gotham City. Similarly, Batman is not as innocent as he seems. The Joker illustrates this by provoking Batman with a difficult choice. The Joker states that for every day Batman does not reveal himself that people will die, Batman refuses regardless, and becomes seen as an enemy of the city as a...

Words: 558 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Does God Exist?

...The concept of religion itself is extremely complex and has been in existence for ages. Religion has been used as a mode of connection with a higher order being in order to have bliss in life and afterlife. There are different perspectives by many philosophers who argue about the controversial topic- existence of God. Some philosophers believe that due to the existence of evil and suffering in our world, it poses a serious challenge to the belief in the existence of a perfect God. In this paper however I am not concerned with the question whether God exists or not but I rather will be discussing the Western concepts of God as well as the Eastern one, followed by the dual existence of a higher being and evil. I will also emphasize on Immanuel Kant's perspectives on religion and radical evil as his views intrigued me the most among all the other philosophers, mentioning my own belief on religion and God. Western thought about God has fallen within some broad form of theism. Theism is the view that states there is a God, which is the creator and one who sustains the universe and is unlimited with regard to knowledge (omniscience), power (omnipotence), extension (omnipresence), and moral perfection. Western philosophy has interfaced most widely with Christianity, Judaism and Islam has also had some influence. The orthodox forms of all these three religions have embraced theism, though each religion has also yielded a wide array of other views. The western concept of God reveals...

Words: 2120 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Influence of Zoroastrianism on Some Important Beliefs of Judaism and Christianity

...gods were recorded, to the writings of the New Testament in the last half of the first century AD, to rejection of several teachings and practices of the Roman Catholic Church by Martin Luther, older religious beliefs have influenced those that followed. Over time, whether from divine revelation or self-proclamation, humans came to new understandings or found disagreement with established religions or belief systems. One lesser known religion that has had major influence on modern Judaism and Christianity is Zoroastrianism. Zoroastrianism is credited by many researchers and scholars as the first religion to present the concepts of monotheism (one supreme god), dualism (the concepts of good and evil), the apocalypse when good triumphs over evil (Satan), and the conscious choice of good over evil in order to be admitted to heaven as opposed to being banished to hell. As with most religions, Zoroastrianism has a founder, Zarathustra (from the Greek), also known as Zoroaster. Mary Boyce in her work, Zorastrians, Their Religious Beliefs and Practices, says Zoroaster lived in the area of ancient Persia (which includes today's Iran), some time between 1700 and 1500 BCE, but other sources date is life as late as the 6th century BCE. According to Richard Foltz in his work, Spirituallity in the Land of the Noble, the oldest evidence of him can be found in portions of the Avesta (scriptures) known as the “Gathas”, poems or verses which are believed to be the preserved words...

Words: 1873 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Just Joining

...Reply Paper to H.J. McCloskey’s Essay: On Being An Atheist H.J McCloskey makes many bold statements in opposition to the most common arguments for theism. To say the least, his bias shows through, even to the point of not seeing the deeper picture. He makes claims against the cosmological and teleological arguments. He then makes a point on how evil speaks against the existence of God. He then concludes with a statement that may or may not be supported by these statements (McCloskey, 1968). The Cosmological Argument McCloskey makes some statements about the necessity of a being that created the universe. He also makes some points about how this being cannot be perfect The Necessarily Existent Being It is amazing how people will require one set of standards for themselves, yet another set of standards for others. This is exemplified in the paper that is presented by H.J McCloskey. He States that proof is required for belief in a god (McCloskey, 1968, p. 51). But he also wants to believe in an origin of the universe in which a bunch of something without origin explodes to create hundreds of thousands of galaxies. Mr. McCloskey wishes to say that one must have proof before they believe. What Mr. McCloskey is not saying is that it would take proof to convince him not to believe in the manner he does. Mr. McCloskey has a belief system which serves his purposes. He has chosen a system that does not have enough solid defeaters to pull it apart. This allows Mr. McCloskey to settle...

Words: 2451 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

The Problem of Evil Exemplar Essay

...underlying facts of the Abrahamic faiths is the concept, that God is simultaneously both omnipotent and Omni-benevolent. They all also argue that God is the single and only cause of the existence of the Universe, and all of its constituents. One of the constituents is the existence of evil. The problem that theists face is, an argument that both atheists and anti-theists use to criticise religion, and question against God; How come Omni-potent God and Omni-Benevolent God, can exist alongside the existence of both Natural and Moral Evil, or at least tolerate it’s occurrence. This comes in the form of the ‘inconsistent triad’ in which , if one were take out either one of the 2 tributes of God, could solve the existence of Evil. To elaborate, if God was omnipotent, though not Omni-benevolent, it would explain, that this God is either Tyrannical, or in a way at the least Sadistic, resembling the God of the Old Testament. On the other hand, if God is Omni-benevolent, he would love humanity, yet does not have the power, to directly prevent it from happening to humanity. Many scholars and theologians, have attempted at solving the problem of evil using theodicies (Justifying the existence of God in the face of evil), two of which were concocted by Irenaean and Leibniz, but include theodicies by St. Augustine and Alfred Whiteheads’ Process theodicy. Irenaeus’ theodicy, argued (like St. Augustine) that moral evil, is the doing of man, by being deviant in their belief in God and faith. However...

Words: 1268 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Rel212 Assignment 1

...Good and Evil REL210 March 14, 2015 The worldview of good and evil is very diverse. A person’s view of what is good and what is evil may be based on many things. We obtain our views based on our culture, environment and life experiences. One of the driving forces for how people view good and evil is religion. Religions can be as diverse as people themselves can; however, one thing that connects each religion is a view of what is good and what is evil. Good and evil and one’s view of it is the driving force behind conscious, that voice in everyone’s head that decides what is right and what is wrong. We learn these behaviors from infancy from our parents and guardians. Parents and guardians more often than not base their children’s upbringing on their chosen religion. From the teaching of good and evil, a child develops morals, which help them make decisions throughout their lives (Hennesy, 2003). Looking at each religion individually there are many similarities, however each religion has their own unique viewpoint. Starting with Hinduism, we see the concept of Karma where all actions have equal consequence to that action for example do a good and good will come to you (Fisher, 2014 p. 77). The Buddhist understanding is that good and evil is innate, inseparable aspects of life. This view makes it impossible to label a particular individual or group as "good" or "evil." Every single human being is capable of acts of the noblest good or the basest evil (SGI Quarterly...

Words: 937 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Problem of Evil and God's Existence

...Running Head:PROBLEM OF EVIL Problem of Evil and God's Existence Ammar Ather Roll#:14-10556, Sec:B Forman Christian College (A Chartered University) Problem of Evil and God's Existence The existence of God and questions pertinent to it, has been discussed for centuries predating Biblical documentation and golden Greek philosophical era of Aristotle and Plato. Thus a supernatural identity has always been the centre of attention among people, Empire, states, ever since man has been derived by intuition of knowing certain things. God has been called by people at times of distress and reassurance. The ancient Egyptians and civilizations called gods when shaken by ordeal. Christians remember God as the embodiment of salvation. People offered god with festivals, coronation ceremonies and even blood sacrifices. The identity of God is perceived differently by people of different beliefs, times and areas. The image of God ranges from Pantheism in the Vedic references to strict Monotheism in Islamic scriptures. This idea is imperative for proceeding and constructing research based on pure rational and Philosophical grounds. The objectivity demands reviewing God and existence within the context of a specific frame of thought and then appropriate approach is utilized to construct an argument. Thesis statement:The belief in God is a cardinal question in dealing with the soteriological and moral implication of mankind which is better contemplated by reviewing theodicy...

Words: 1887 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Zoroastrianism and Its Influences on the World

...Zoroastrianism and Its Influences on the World With a membership of about 200,000, the importance of Zoroastrianism is far greater than its numbers suggest. Closely related to Judaism, Christianity and Islam, its concepts of Satan, angelology, demonology, a deliverer, future life, paradise and judgment in these religions may have been directly or indirectly derived from Zoroastrianism. Founded by the Iranian prophet and reformer Zoroaster in the 6th century BC, Zoroastrianism contains both monotheistic and dualistic features. Its concepts of one God, judgment, heaven and hell likely influenced the major Western religions. History of Zoroastrianism The origins of the Zoroastrian religion are shrouded in mystery. The prophet Zarathustra, later referred to by the Greeks as Zoroaster, founded Zoroastrianism roughly between the 16th and 10th centuries BCE. Zoroaster's birth date is also uncertain and modern scholarship currently suggests he lived in northern or eastern Iran or nearby such as in Afghanistan or southern Russia. In Zoroaster’s thirties he had a revelation in which he saw an angel who told him that there is only one true god and that God’s name was Aura Mazda (Clark, 1998). It is certain that by the year 549 B.C.E., Zoroastrianism had become a major world religion. It was Cyrus the Great, first ruler of the Persian Empire, who ordained Zoroastrianism as the official religion of his state. It was this same Cyrus that liberated the Jews from the occupation they...

Words: 3646 - Pages: 15

Free Essay

Dialogue Between Rabbi and Athiest

...A Dialogue between a Rabbi and an Atheist about the Problem of Evil (On a sunny Monday morning in Ukraine, Rabbi Samuel Goldfarb is taking a leisurely walk through the town marketplace. The Rabbi is well loved and respected in the community, always exchanging greeting with the townspeople. He comes upon a newcomer to the town, Radical Enchain, whom he does not recognize and starts a polite conversation with him.) Rabbi: Top of the morning to you sir. My name is Rabbi Samuel Goldfarb. I would like to welcome you to town. What is your name? What brings you to this lovely town in Ukraine? Radislav: Nice to meet you Rabbi and good morning to you as well. My name is Radislav Venchkin. I just emigrated here from Poland. I was looking for a fresh start so I’m here trying the town out and trying to get a feel for the town and its culture. Rabbi: Radislav, you made an excellent choice. This town is a diverse town with a tight knit community. There is a close relationship between everyone in town even though it looks as if everyone is all over the place. I’m sure you will find it quite nice here. Radislav: Well Rabbi, I would love to hear more in detail about the community and what it has to offer. May I speak with you in a more formal setting? Rabbi: It would be my pleasure Radislav. I happen to be on my way to Temple in the center of town. I have scheduled an emergency prayer service for my congregation. With all the bad things happening in the world; hurricanes...

Words: 1488 - Pages: 6