The Death Penalty Essay.

In: Other Topics

Submitted By Fieo
Words 1248
Pages 5
The Death Penalty
Can one justify an action of a cold killer? Furthermore, should death penalty be abolish? Lastly, is it possibly to end the debate about death penalty and the abolition of it? William Otis comes with his arguments in “The Death Penalty Saves Lives”, 2006, for why death penalty should not be abolish and his opinion of the abolitionists own arguments for it.

The death penalty or capital punishment is a legit system where a person, who has committed a serious crime, it put to death by the state as punishment. The death penalty consist of two parts, the death sentence, which is the judicial decree that the person gets, and the other part is the actual execution.
Death penalty has been used for many decades, and are still being used today, but of course not as often. In the past, it was performed by most societies and the most common execution method was beheading, which were most often public.
In the United States, death penalty is a legal punishment in 32 states as well as the federal civilian and military legal systems. Since 1976, the most common method used to execute an inmate is lethal injection. Furthermore, in that same year the death penalty was reinstated after a ten-year long moratorium, which is a temporary stopping of a certain activity, thirty-four states have performed executions.
A year that is very interesting, as far as death penalty goes, is 2012, because it was the year with the lowest executions in USA and, furthermore, by information from the report The Death Penalty in 2012: Year End Report from Death Penalty Information Center, we can account for the use of capital punishment in the USA in 2012. The report stated that forty-three people were executed while only seventy-seven were under death sentence.
In addition, the report says that only nine of the thirty-two states performed executions in 2012 and that just four…...

Similar Documents

Death Penalty

...Abstract The essay outlines the arguments for abolishing the death penalty, also including any counter arguments that can be used for a use of the death penalty. The arguments made in this essay for death-penalty abolition are its devaluation of human life, eliminating of the possibility for revenge, its violation of human rights, as well as including the view of religious groups. This essay argues that all of these arguments address that human life cannot be taken away from a person, even if the person is a murder, simply because then the society is not being better than the murder him- or herself. I have investigated many research and scientific studies in order to back up my arguments as best as possible. Furthermore I have also investigated into the methods of death penalty, such as lethal injection. This essay views practice of capital punishment as an expression of anxiety about safety, in particular it counteracts the argument that death penalty would deter any future crime, and terrorist attacks. I also looked up numbers in order to show how costly death penalty is, in order to emphasize that there are more cheaper and less inhumane methods to sentence a murder. I also draw attention to countries that use death penalty as a way to eliminate any enemies, using it as a political weapon to silence any troublesome individuals. I suggest that every life is valuable, and that death penalty does not consider the risk of killing an innocent person, but rather emphasize......

Words: 2476 - Pages: 10

Argumentative Essay - Death Penalty

...Topic 5: The Death Penalty being reinstated: Ray Krone was sentenced to death for a crime he did not commit. After serving more than 10 years in Arizona prisons, including 32 months on death row, he was successfully vindicated in 2002. His innocence was finally established after DNA tests proved another man had committed the murder of a female bartender. If he were not proved innocent then he would have been killed because of the death penalty. His whole life would have been taken away from him because of a mistake that was made by the police. These mistakes could happen on a daily basis and innocent people around the world could actually have their lives taken from them because of the death penalty. The death penalty isn’t an effective way to prevent or reduce crime, it costs a whole lot more money than life in prison, and worst of all, risks executions of innocent people as I have mentioned. The death penalty is much more expensive than life in prison. The high costs of the death penalty are for the complicated legal process. The point is to avoid executing innocent people, but have not been successful in doing so. There are tremendous expenses in a death penalty case whether or not the defendant is convicted, never mind sentenced to death. If it happens that an innocent person is executed then families will most likely sew large amounts of money for the killing of their innocent loved one who’s life was taken away, which will lead to more time spent in......

Words: 486 - Pages: 2

The Death Penalty

...The Death Penalty The death penalty is a form of punishment in which a person who has been convicted of a serious crime is executed under the precept of the criminal justice system. The death penalty has been in existence for thousands of years and has gained wide acceptance in the United States since early colonial times. Even those who framed the Constitution specifically the Fifth Amendment approved of it though implicitly (McCord and Latzer 9). Despite the growing acceptance of the death penalty as an appropriate punishment for certain kinds of crimes such as first degree murders, there are still some people who argue against it on certain grounds. The debate as to the justification of the death penalty has raged on for a long time. On one hand, there are those who are of the opinion that the death penalty is a cruel punishment which is morally wrong and a violation of the right to life for its victims. Others defend their opposing views by citing the wave of abolition of other types of corporal punishment such as branding and flogging and propose that imprisonment should also replace the death penalty (McCord and Latzer 9). However, the death penalty has proved to be a punishment befitting certain crimes such as horrific murders as it is the ultimate punishment. It has taken many harmful elements off the streets besides acting as a deterrent for both the convicted criminals and other potential murderers out there. In essence, it has saved many innocent lives that......

Words: 2007 - Pages: 9

Death Penalty

...Death Penalty English Composition CM-220 Unit 2 Assignment March 31, 2013 Death Penalty My “Big Idea” topic is on the death penalty. My thesis statement is: Capital punishment is controversial and people have many different feelings about it but I believe that the death penalty is beneficial to society and the public and that the United States should continue to use capital punishment. When doing research for an essay paper it is important to use reputable sources and avoid unreliable or opinionated web sites or articles, such as Wikipedia and Answers.com. Areas or items I will use to do research for my death penalty paper will be the U.S. Department of Justice, Amnesty International, CNN news reports and articles, American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and the Pro-death Penalty web site. The Kaplan library has a Homeland Security Digital Library database which might contain some information that I can use and the Newspaper Source database is bound to have some pertinent information. The Kaplan library also has an abundance of articles and reports as well as a database with news and current topics I can explore for information. To get an idea of some material readily available in the Kaplan library database I did a keyword search on “pro death penalty” articles and three periodicals came up that I am going to review and they are: Top Ten Death Penalty Myths: The Politics of Crime Control; Debating the Death Penalty: Should America Have Capital Punishment; and......

Words: 468 - Pages: 2

Death Penalty

...The Death Penalty The death penalty is a form of punishment in which a person who has been convicted of a serious crime is executed under the precept of the criminal justice system. The death penalty has been in existence for thousands of years and has gained wide acceptance in the United States since early colonial times. Even those who framed the Constitution specifically the Fifth Amendment approved of it though implicitly (McCord and Latzer 9). Despite the growing acceptance of the death penalty as an appropriate punishment for certain kinds of crimes such as first degree murders, there are still some people who argue against it on certain grounds. The debate as to the justification of the death penalty has raged on for a long time. On one hand, there are those who are of the opinion that the death penalty is a cruel punishment which is morally wrong and a violation of the right to life for its victims. Others defend their opposing views by citing the wave of abolition of other types of corporal punishment such as branding and flogging and propose that imprisonment should also replace the death penalty (McCord and Latzer 9). However, the death penalty has proved to be a punishment befitting certain crimes such as horrific murders as it is the ultimate punishment. It has taken many harmful elements off the streets besides acting as a deterrent for both the convicted criminals and other potential murderers out there. In essence, it has saved many innocent lives that......

Words: 2007 - Pages: 9

Death Penalty Essay

...Death Penalty in Contemporary Society Although some people may say that the death penalty is completely absurd and an unjust method of punishment, this is not true. In a contemporary society, the idea that the death penalty is necessary is partially valid. Recent studies have shown that the death penalty acts as a deterrent, preventing murders and saving lives. The death penalty also allows for reduced costs, instead of having that person in jail for the rest of their life. Lastly, it provides justice for the victims and the families who went through the pain and struggles of the crime. According to around a dozen studies, executions save lives. Studies show that for each inmate put to death, three to eighteen murders are prevented. Research; such as that from H. Naci Mocan, an economist at LSU shows that the death penalty has a deterrent effect. This shows that the death penalty has a lasting effect on a community and the criminals in that community. The death penalty shows that criminals could be subject to capital punishment for crimes they are committing, so it makes them realize that and to not do it. Also, if a person is put to death instead of being put in jail for a period of time, that person won’t be released from jail to do the same crime, such as murder, and go back into jail, thus saving lives of innocent people. (Source C and Source E) From previous arguments, the death penalty allows for reduced costs to taxpayers. It’s been stated that it costs roughly......

Words: 583 - Pages: 3

Death Penalty

...“Death Penalty” Furman was a poor black man living in Georgia when he broke into William Joseph Micke, Jr’s house, Mr. Micke went downstairs to investigate and saw William Furman in his house with a gun. Furman began to flee the house but tripped in the process and fired the gun accidently shooting Mr. Micke in the chest and killing him instantly. Furman was later found by the police still carrying the gun and arrested for murder. This case is known as Furman v. Georgia and was taken to the Supreme Court on the fact that the death penalty in Georgia violated the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. This is a landmark case because “The significance of Furman v. Georgia is that this case was the first case that was ruled violating the Eighth amendment and that it halted every man on death row in the United States” (study). But before the case reached the Supreme Court the case went on trial September 20, 1968 where Furman pleaded mentally ill and insane, the court rejected his plea and found him guilty of murder. Then, Furman appealed his conviction and sentence, based on the death penalty in Georgia violating the Eighth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution . The Eighth Amendment says the federal government may not use "cruel and unusual punishments” (Henson). The case was later tried in the Supreme Court January 17, 1972. The justices who won majority and reversed the case were William J. Brennan, Jr., William O. Douglas, Thurgood Marshall,......

Words: 3854 - Pages: 16

Death Penalty

...MWF 8:05 AM – 8:59 AM English Composition 2 12/07/12 The Death Penalty Crimes are committed every day. Some of them worse than others. The worst crimes get the worst punishment. That can mean capital punishment. Capital punishment is just another way of saying legal murder. Should it be allowed? This is one of the most debated issues in the criminal justice system. Hundreds of criminals are being killed legally at the hands of the government every day. Why you may ask, because they were convicted of killing one or more people. But the government can do it and get away with it. The death penalty is wrong and should be outlawed in all 50 states. The reasons why it should be outlawed are: the person could be innocent, it is not a good crime deterrent, and it does not cause closure for a victim’s families. The most obvious reason it should be banned is that it is against the law. It says so in our constitution. The Eighth Amendment clearly states that the federal government is prohibited from using cruel and unusual punishment. Most people would have to say that sitting down in a chair and getting electrocuted until your dead or getting poison shoved in your veins is pretty cruel and unusual. Also when you put someone to death for committing murder you are committing an act of it as well, which is an eye for an eye. Evidently the government seems to not think so. Another good reason to ban capital punishment is the person who was charged with the murder could actually...

Words: 1112 - Pages: 5

The Death Penalty

...The Death Penalty Lucious Davis PHI200: Mind and Machine Instructor: Michelle Loudermilk October 10, 2011 The United States is still one of the countries that still use the death penalty as punishment for crimes. While some see it as barbaric and totally against American values, others view it as an important deterrent to violent crimes- such as murder. Regardless of which side you are on, one thing is for sure- the debate isn’t going anywhere anytime soon. Capital punishment, another name for the death penalty, has been present in the United States since 1608. This is the process by which a person a person is tried and put to death for crimes they have committed. The list of crimes that are punishable by death vary from state to state (the U.S. government and the U.S. military have their own criteria), as well as the methods used for execution. Lethal injection is the standard for execution, but there are several other methods used, including: electrocution, hanging, and death by firing squad. Although every state does not employ the death penalty- a vast majority do. Along with the District of Columbia and the U.S. government, 36 states currently have the power to execute inmates. Through the centuries there has been endless debate about the morality, legality, and constitutionality of capital punishment. For many (and for my paper’s sake) the debate is whether or not the death penalty is ethical. Specifically, is it ethical to put someone to death......

Words: 2978 - Pages: 12

Death Penalty Essay

...Death Penalty Essay Should rapists and murderers really be given the privilege to live after they ruined a family, broke their hearts, and took a loved one away from them forever? After his victim is six feet in the ground, to never be found, or if they lived, to be scarred for the rest of their lives and to never be able to trust anyone the same ever again because of what they've been through? Well in my opinion they shouldn't. They should be given the death penalty because they took an innocent life on purpose just to satisfy his needs so his life should be taken as well. He should not only get sent to prison but get the death penalty as well. i think there are two different types of murderers. There's the murderer that lives for killing and likes chopping the body parts of his victim or even likes eating them. They plan their murder to the very last detail, maybe they know their victim or maybe they don't, but they know exactly how much time they are going to spend with them and how they are going to kill them; these are called premeditated murders. Then there are the types that act in the moment of anger or of fear and dont realize what they are doing until they have already done it. I dont think that this type of murderer deserves the death penalty but they do deserve some time in prison to pay for what he or she did if it wasnt in self-defense. Many people think that if a murderer is sent to prison for life that he is going to stop killing, but there is no guarentee......

Words: 1787 - Pages: 8

Death Penalty

...The Death Penalty; when people hear this term many thoughts and emotions are immediately brought to mind. The death penalty is considered by many to be the harshest form of punishment for crimes against society, but is it too harsh? Many would argue that it is cruel and unusual punishment and that it punishes not just the one convicted but also all of those involved. In this paper we will look at not only the one receiving the punishment but also those involved, including the family of the victim, the jurors, the executioner(s), and the family members of the one being convicted and argue that the sociological impact that the death penalty creates is too devastating for its continued use in the United States. “The first established death penalty laws date as far back as the Eighteenth Century B.C. in the Code of King Hammaurabi of Babylon, which codified the death penalty for 25 different crimes. (deathpenaltyinfo.org)” This is where the term “eye for an eye” originated as well as the belief that the crimes punishment must equal the severity of the crime. United States law was heavily influenced by Great Britain due to Britain maintaining primary control of the original 13 colonies. Currently, in the United States, the Death Penalty is mainly used as a form of punishment for first degree murder however some states still use it for acts of treason. Opposition of the Death Penalty began obtaining a foot hold during the Abolitionist movement when Cesare Beccaria's 1767 essay,......

Words: 1023 - Pages: 5

Essay on Death Penalty

...English essay Topic: capital punishment The causes, effects and solutions to the problems of serious crimes are causing a big debate all over the world. Should ‘capital punishment’ be restored? Capital punishment (also called death penalty or execution) is a way of punishing an inmate on the death row, who is accused of committing crimes. Everybody knows the expression “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” - but is this really how we want to live our lives? Is capital punishment all about getting revenge, or is it more about getting rid of the guilty prisoners - and how do we know whether they are guilty or not? And should one even be able to decide another one’s destiny, and whether they have a right to live or not? Either you punish, because there will be a beneficial outcome, or else you punish because the prisoner has deserved it. But the big question is: where do we draw the line of whether it’s right or wrong - which criminal actions deserve capital punishment, and which does not? The text “Capital punishment in the US” reads: “An argument often made by opponents of the death penalty is that innocent people are sometimes executed.” p. 31 ll. 8-10 A big problem could be, that if the prisoner is acquitted of the charge, they hand the prisoner some money, to make up for the “lost years”, but how is a human’s life even measured in the value of money? Perhaps it’s not, it’s just a way for the government to show that one actually is able to escape the death row,......

Words: 697 - Pages: 3

The Death Penalty

...The Death Penalty The presence of the death penalty in many of our countries today raises one important query: Have we founded our justice systems out of our desire for deterrence or retribution? This essay intends to examine both sides of the debate and take a stand in this debate. Arguments Against: The death penalty inculcates nothing in the condemned. They are taught precisely nothing because they are no longer living to learn from their wrongs. The penalty does not dissuade. Research has revealed that capital punishment does not dissuade other people from committing murder. People still murder other people in spite of courts still pronouncing executions. In 2012, for instance, the rate of murder in the United States was 4.8 victims in every 100,000 people. This means that approximately 15,000 people were victims of murder that year. Capital punishment, therefore, does not seem to be serving its purpose. The penalty is hypocritical. It is outlandish that a country that deplores the practice of murder commits the same act. Moreover, it is religiously wrong to intentionally kill another person. The Bible and other religious books condemn this killing and urge us to protect life instead. This is because life is sacred and precious. God alone should make the decision to take away the life of a person, even if that person has taken away the life of another. Furthermore, the Holy Books urge us to left vengeance to God. Subjecting the condemned to the death penalty......

Words: 889 - Pages: 4

The Death Penalty

...THE DEATH PENALTY Death penalty is an issue that brings a lot of controversy in our society, this is an important topic because the life of a person is on the hands of a group of people that decide whether this individual should live or die. Different opinions exist in our society about this action, because some citizens believe that these murderers should pay with their lives for the crimes they committed. On the other hand, another group of people think that the death penalty is a cruel and unnecessary punishment that should not exist, because two wrongs does not make one right. If we kill a person no matter what crime he or she committed, we become murderers. Anthony G. Amsterdam wrote in his article Capital Punishment “death penalty is a fancy phrase for legally killing people” and I agree with his statement. The principle of an eye for an eye should not exist, because the criminal will never learn the lesson that he or she did a big mistake, further more this criminal will not get a chance to redeem himself or herself. Is our court system perfect? The answer is no. What happens if the system finds somebody guilty of a crime by mistake? And this person is sentenced to death. As a society what should we do if after somebody was kill under the death penalty and new evidence shows that he or she was innocent? For example “Timothy Evans, an innocent man whose execution was among the reasons for the abolition of the death penalty in Great Britain”. A mistake of this......

Words: 652 - Pages: 3

Cba Death Penalty Essay

...In the case of the death penalty, I am against it because I believe people are sometimes wrongly convicted for crimes and they might have to pay for a crime they didn’t commit with their life. Another reason why I am against the death penalty is because in my opinion, I think that there is no greater punishment than holding the individual that committed a heinous crime to spend the rest of their life having to live with what they did. The death penalty violates the 8th amendment on cruel and unusual punishments because the government is taking away someone's life for an action they did when all they might need is some psychological help. The government should apply some sort of action to try and help kids at a young age to see if they have any differences from the other kids. Another way to try and discourage people away from killing is to stop advertising killing like it's fun like on video games, since the kids who are playing it are the future of our country and all those games show is people killing each other to be at the top of the leaderboard. According to a study on oadp.org, it lists many reasons why the death penalty should be gone. One reason is, the death penalty is applied at random, from the 15,000 homicides that are committed a year, only 120 get the death penalty. So it hardly used. Also it showed that your race could play a huge part in how your sentencing could go, if you’re a minority your sentencing could be worse than a white person for example. ......

Words: 694 - Pages: 3