Premium Essay

The Effects of Fi Scal Spending Shocks on the Performance of Simple Monetary Policy Rules

In: Business and Management

Submitted By wantynylove1
Words 12497
Pages 50
Economic Modelling 30 (2013) 643–662

Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect

Economic Modelling

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecmod

The effects of fiscal spending shocks on the performance of simple monetary policy rules
Ali K. Malik ⁎
Karachi School for Business and Leadership (KSBL), Bahadurabad, National Stadium Road, Karachi 74800, Pakistan

a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:
Accepted 26 August 2012
JEL classification:
E50
E52
E58
Keywords:
Fiscal policy
Monetary policy
Inflation targeting
Impulse response analysis
Macroeconomic variables

1. Introduction a b s t r a c t
We examine the effects of fiscal shocks on the performance of alternative monetary policy rules in a small dynamic general equilibrium framework. We explicitly consider the interaction between fiscal and monetary policy rules which may be present in the real world. We use a simple specification for the fiscal policy rule and various specifications for the (simple) monetary policy rule. Our analysis suggests that some form of flex- ible inflation targeting regime would perform well in response to fiscal shocks compared to other forms of policy regimes.
© 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

monetary policy has developed largely in isolation. The terminology
‘fiscal theory of the price level’ does however correspond to some ear- Monetary policy rules have come under extensive examination in the literature on monetary policy in the recent years. Simple mone- tary policy rules appear to be more robust across a wide range of models compared to the optimal rules and tend to perform better em- pirically as well, see Taylor (1999a). Taylor (1993, 1999b) finds that his simple policy rule (known as the ‘Taylor’ rule) performs remark- ably well in empirically (approximating) the monetary policy of the
Federal...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Most Harmless Econometrics

...Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’ Companion s Joshua D. Angrist Massachusetts Institute of Technology Jörn-Ste¤en Pischke The London School of Economics March 2008 ii Contents Preface Acknowledgments Organization of this Book xi xiii xv I Introduction 1 3 9 10 12 16 1 Questions about Questions 2 The Experimental Ideal 2.1 2.2 2.3 The Selection Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Random Assignment Solves the Selection Problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Regression Analysis of Experiments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . II The Core 19 21 22 23 26 30 36 38 38 44 47 51 51 3 Making Regression Make Sense 3.1 Regression Fundamentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.1.1 3.1.2 3.1.3 3.1.4 3.2 Economic Relationships and the Conditional Expectation Function . . . . . . . . . . . Linear Regression and the CEF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Asymptotic OLS Inference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Saturated Models, Main E¤ects, and Other Regression Talk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Regression and Causality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.2.1 3.2.2 3.2.3 The Conditional Independence Assumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The Omitted Variables Bias Formula . ....

Words: 114745 - Pages: 459

Premium Essay

Bare Bones

...Bare Bones    Revision Guide AQA A2 Business Studies Unit 4 The Business Environment & Managing Change y y lic po ar e h th ow gr ar et on m y ion lic o yp t ec ot tive pr pec t s st n o em ti un xa idy ta ubs s c e l se w s po ket ies ar eg e m at g str ad y c s tr gin te er ra oli ver ersment n of emorpo m l p o rg ploy xatio ts ke e cl er ers n m lder p yme u ns keho plo a co n io t fla in g lin r e ng hao a ke c eed c a m fis t objectives t fr d men aims an ic environnment m econo enviro ment social nviron ange h legal e e em un ta of c causes ship leader g and proc hange g for c ess entin implem ing change s manag decision plannin rship exch st rates intere tives objecg markets in g emerg tion inflaange rates cto phic fa nemp subsid taxa hea u n envirot l M e ade s on na a n gi ra demog al dec politic ow ons er su n c C change i nfl subunemployateion men si m nt t re gula dy tio p an h envir social u lea ence ns d s fisc ersh al p i olic p y ge leade e cultur nt onme leg al inte stra rnal c teg au infl ic decisio ses enviro n missio tec al envir ecisio nt ra hno onm ns logi ent po cal or c strategi es influenc......

Words: 27143 - Pages: 109