...specifically called the Neutrality Acts. They did not sell arms, loans, and had no business with war countries whatsoever. The key idea to not get involved with other foreign countries was isolationism. During the time, however, problems still existed in terms with racial inequalities and where women belong. They were ignored to some extent; women were still out of the picture as they were seen inferior which still also applies to African Americans who are still segregated. As the U.S. struggled through the Great Depression, minority rights were not addressed even in Roosevelt's New Deal. Positive changes were bought to American nationality during WWII, but even in the end certain groups still struggled for acknowledgment as there were limits. The benefits of WWII were contradictory; Ethnic minorities and women would witness the war to only be a relaxing period, only to realize they were forced to their old ways or even into worse problems after the war was over. As soon as the Japanese attacked Pearl Harbor as a response to the American embargo, the U.S. transitioned quickly into mobilization...
Words: 1506 - Pages: 7
...How did Americans justify their overseas expansion at the end of the nineteenth century, and how did the people in the conquered territories view the United States’ actions? Towards the end of the nineteenth century, America had begun to develop at a rather substantial rate. The aftermath of the Civil War was followed by a developing economy, advances in technology and transportation, and territory expansion that would eventually lead to conflict with other nations. In the pursuit to become a global superpower, the United States had conquered the overseas nations of Cuba, Puerto Rico, and the Philippines by the end of the nineteenth century. This expansion by the United States was fueled by a promotion of democracy, but came off as an arrogant struggle for power to the conquered territories. The United States seized an opportunity in the conquering of overseas territories, as the civilians of those territories criticized America’s notion for self-governed nations and doubted the influence of American imperialism. (Aguinaldo, 69) With the result of the Spanish-American War ending up in favor of the United States, the acquisition of an overseas empire was a new concept to the American government. A clear motive for conquering overseas territories is to promote democracy. However, it could definitely be argued that acquiring, for instance, the territory of the Philippines was seen as a business opportunity. At the time of these overseas acquisitions, President McKinley was unsure...
Words: 577 - Pages: 3
...However, before he could make the world safe for democracy he needed to reform America and how they viewed personal freedom and things like that. The progressivism idea for America was not necessarily bad, however it led to much progress in the society that some did not agree with. With the progressives and socialists spreading the idea that the people should be free and education should be free, and people should control the government etc. movement like the birth control movement, woman’s suffrage and others like this were encouraged, however many people were not happy with this while others in these cases almost every woman was happy because of the new freedoms. So the policies of the Era encouraged progress, but many people thought that this progress was destroying the morals, traditions and beliefs of the...
Words: 1708 - Pages: 7
...Francis Fukuyama. The end of the Cold War as the end of history. Introduction. The specifics of the international situation after the Cold War. Since 1985, the world is going through an amazing evolution. The interdependence emerged and has become a reality of understanding of all processes in the world. Peace, freedom, human rights, social security, democracy have taken place of those values, because of which the major battles were unfold in the international arena and within countries. Overnight concepts collapsed that before seemed unshakable. In this case, not only the political picture of the world changed . At large numbers of people in different countries sense of global community, solidarity, public interest, human intimacy has been strengthened . Not surprisingly, that the rapid evolution of the global situation, the collapse of the bipolar system and fade into the background of ideological aspects confused scientists specializing in political predictions. Now, it is necessary not only to explain the reasons which led to the formation of new political realities after the "cold war", but also suggest new approaches and concepts on the basis of which it was possible to trace the dynamics of international relations in a changing world. Francis Fukuyama, his works and intepretations. Francis Fukuyama - known American political scientist and geopolitician. He received a bachelor's degree from Cornell University (New York), then - PhD in political science from...
Words: 2329 - Pages: 10
...Prompt: To what extent did the goals of American foreign policy change in the years 1930-1941? For what reasons did these goals change? The 1930s were a difficult time for most Americans. Faced with colossal economic hardships—unprecedented in American history—many Americans turned inward to focus on the worsening situation at home. The United States became increasingly insensitive to the obliteration of fellow democracies at the hands of brutal fascist leaders like Hitler and Mussolini. The U.S. was determined to stay out of war at all costs—even if its allies were in trouble; Americans believed that they were immune from Europe’s problems as long as they refused to get involved. However, as the “free” countries fell, one by one, to the Nazi war machine, Americans began to realize the folly of their foolish optimism and clamored for increasing involvement in foreign affairs. American foreign policy changed in the years 1930-1941 as Americans realized that fascism would likely conquer all of Europe unless Americans acted quickly. Ultimately, it was fear of the fascist threat to American democracy that triggered the end of American isolationism and inaugurated the era of American interventionism. World War I had left a bitter taste in the mouths of many Americans; many believed that the U.S. had been tricked into joining the war for the wrong reasons, and they were determined to avoid making the same mistake twice. After the Great War, Americans were disappointed to realize that the...
Words: 1256 - Pages: 6
...Critical Response on Democracy DeVry University Political Science 330 July 16, 2011 Democracy when looked at as a system of government is when power is vested in the people who rule either directly or indirectly through freely elected officials. (democracy. (n.d.) The American Heritage® New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition, n.d). There are certain criteria and conditions that must be place in order for a government to be considered democratic. In a democratic society the government will get its power form the people that it is to govern over. The people will elect representatives who are given the responsibility of being their voice in the state capital or countries capital. The representative’s job is to make sure they are trying to do what is in the best interest of the people that they represent. This way is called a representative democracy. The representatives under this type of representation are allowed to be in office for a specific period of time through elections. When they have completed the set term they were elected for then they must step down or try to stay in office by seeking re-election. (Dr. Almon Leroy Way, n.d.). Today you have current events that provide evidence of democracy at work in America. Looking at 2006 and 2007, our economy started to collapse and you could see that the American public as a whole was not happy with the direction of the economy and the government. They had grown weary of the War in Iraq and the drain on America’s...
Words: 1287 - Pages: 6
...The 1930s were a difficult time for most Americans. Faced with colossal economic hardships—unprecedented in American history—many Americans turned inward to focus on the worsening situation at home. The United States became increasingly insensitive to the obliteration of fellow democracies at the hands of brutal fascist leaders like Hitler and Mussolini. The U.S. was determined to stay out of war at all costs—even if its allies were in trouble; Americans believed that they were immune from Europe’s problems as long as they refused to get involved. However, as the “free” countries fell, one by one, to the Nazi war machine, Americans began to realize the folly of their foolish optimism and clamored for increasing involvement in foreign affairs. American foreign policy changed in the years 1930-1941 as Americans realized that fascism would likely conquer all of Europe unless Americans acted quickly. Ultimately, it was fear of the fascist threat to American democracy that triggered the end of American isolationism and inaugurated the era of American interventionism. World War I had left a bitter taste in the mouths of many Americans; many believed that the U.S. had been tricked into joining the war for the wrong reasons, and they were determined to avoid making the same mistake twice. After the Great War, Americans were disappointed to realize that the war was fought for null; World War I was not the “War to End Wars” as advertised by the government propaganda. The disappointment...
Words: 1232 - Pages: 5
...put it, make the world “safe for democracy” (Pg. 547 p.1). This idea that the world would be declared “safe for democracy” later influenced Wilson’s actions after the war as well and was a major theme in Wilson’s presidency. Yet, many people saw flaws with this philosophy and didn’t think Wilson held up to his statement. Wilson’s idea of making the world safe for democracy was both literal and figurative. He didn’t want to protect just the idea of democracy, but the American way of life as a whole. With the sinking of American ships by the Germans, it was the perfect platform for Wilson to ask Congress for a declaration of war. This was a shining example of how the world was not safe for democracy, just as the American sailors that had been on those ships weren’t safe either. This wasn’t just America’s problem however, Germany’s militarism threatened democracy in Britain, France, and other fellow democratic European countries. In his address to Congress, Wilson accused Germany of “warfare against all mankind.” (Pg. 547 p. 1). This was no longer a fight for democracy, but a fight for every free man, woman, and child everywhere. While American soldiers were shipped across the pond to aid the Allies in the war, Wilson started a campaign for democracy back home. Patriotism ran rampant in American streets in an attempt to boost morale and support for the war but instead ended in riots and violence. This idea of protecting democracy and making the world safe for it played...
Words: 613 - Pages: 3
...American Democracy from 1750 to 1780 As colonial settlers attempted to break away from British rule, the society that they lived in became increasingly democratic. This change was exemplified through a number of factors that have been recorded as history. From the First Great Awakening that sparked religious democracy to the poor having more participation in office and the culmination that was the American Revolutionary War, democracy became more and more prevalent in America from 1750 to 1780. The Great Awakening brought a wave of religious democracy to the colonies as colonists were brought together through their intense bible studies. Besides this, as the people began to sit down and really read the bibles for themselves their views on authority figures and reliance on religious figures changed; people were also able to choose when to go to church and what church they’d attend. Laws would also be established in the later 1700s separating state and church. As you can see, religious democracy had some radical changes over a thirty-year period time, and definitely improved for the better of America. Having more land directly related to having more power for a number of years, but in 1750, and continuing on for years to come, the voting requirements in colonies were changed to allow the less wealthy to vote and have more participation in the government. This followed the boom in religious democracy as people began to realize that, like their religious decisions,...
Words: 528 - Pages: 3
...American politics in different media An essay written by Emil Holte. As the headline articulates this essay would be about American politics in different medias. This essay will discuss the representation of American politics in three different medias. The media consists of books, TV-series and Cartoons. To be more specific it is, America – A Citizen’s Guide to Democracy Inaction (chapter 6), House of Cards and a cartoon with Obama and Romney. These three medias do all somehow have a common representation of American politics or American politicians. What do they have in common and where do they differentiate from each other? The common thing all three different medias are representing is the overall opinion of the American politician and American politics in general. The book, America – A Citizen’s Guide to Democracy Inaction (chapter 6), is deeper in the “theoretical” aspect than the other two. But you should not be fooled by the word theoretical. The book does describe the American politics and the politicians, but it is in a very informal and sarcastic approach. The sixth chapter describes campaigns and elections and therefore also how the American politician acts. It tells basic facts about American politics but with a twist of a subjective and sarcastically opinion. As an example “Initially, the process of conducting campaigns and holding elections was conceived as a means to an end – the peaceful transfer of power.”. Later on in the same passage “Today, running for...
Words: 943 - Pages: 4
...Introduction- definition of democracy 3. Democracy in western states * United states of America-government and politics * Germany - government and politics Democracy in African countries * South Africa- government and politics 4. Comparison and contrast between African and western democracy 5. Conclusion 6. Referees INTRODUCTION Often do we come across the word democracy people are constantly trying to define it but most do not understand it. It has many definitions but what I term best fit is a government for the people and by the people. It is a form of government in which all eligible citizens are meant to participate equally either directly or indirectly through elected representatives or by establishment of laws in which the society is run. There are three main types which include direct democracy, presidential democracy and parliament democracy. Any form of democracy tries in its own way to ascertain the will of the people and to bring public affairs into line with it. This can be achieved by direct democracy or by a body of elected representatives. Within the group of representative democracies the focus may be on a strong president which is the presidential democracy or on a strong parliament which is the parliament democracy. As earlier mentioned the question is never on whether there exist some forms of direct participation or of representation but rather on how much importance they are given in a certain system. Democracy in western states UNITED STATES...
Words: 2491 - Pages: 10
...They were the most lethal terrorist attacks in history, taking the lives of 3000 American and international citizens and ultimately leading to changes in anti-terror approaches and operations in the U.S and around the globe. (www.fbi.gov). Before 9/11 occurred, the U.S was encountering a period of peace and economic boom. This fostered the illusion that International Relations were of no great significance in the wider arena. The American public and political classes were unconcerned with previous attacks on the World Trade Centre in 94, the attack on the USS Cole, and the attacks on US embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Attacks of 9/11 and the fall of the World Trade Centre’s marked the beginning of the real 21st century. (Brown 04). 9/11 was not simply an act of terror but the most destructive single act of terror since World War 2. Many in the Islamic community saw the attack, as an attack on “the symbolic heart of global capitalism” (Brown 04). 9/11 galvanised the American people, and less then 12 hours after the attacks, president Bush formally declared a “war on terror”. Overnight America’s relationships with Russia, China and India improved. Britain and Australia were also seen as close allies. President Bush and his supporters stressed the need to go on the offensive against terrorists, to deploy the U.S. military, and to promote democracy in the Middle East. (Gordon 07). The U.S is fighting a war on terror and must remain on the offensive. The Bush administration feel,...
Words: 2090 - Pages: 9
...The United States has changed over time making the American citizens question what power of government they are being ruled under. The changes this country has gone through can show the development of the different government powers. The main three: Oligarchy, Democracy, and Plutocracy. The basic definition of an Oligarchy is when a small group, or a few people, has control over a country or organization. Specific groups in the US have had problems with the top 1% and the fairness between different groups. Democracy is when the power is vested within the people through elected representatives. The majority of Americans already believe that the United States is a democracy, but some believe that there is too much liberty within the people....
Words: 1405 - Pages: 6
...Democracy, a form of government that many people like and many people dislike. This form of government is used in the United States of America, and many other countries. It was formed to bring more power to the people and less power to the leader(s). The democratic form of government in the United States started in 1776 and George Washington was the first to witness this form of government for us. I believe that the word “democracy” means, government of the people. I believe it means this because one of the main reasons it was used in the United States was because after the American Revolution, the Americans wanted to make their government a government that would give more power to the people so it’s as equal as it can get. What makes democracy...
Words: 616 - Pages: 3
...April 10, 2014 American History Final Essay Throughout American history, democracy has been an ever changing system of government; however it is far from perfect. It is constantly shaped by wealth and people of higher power. This played a significant role throughout the early 1800s in limiting the power of African Americans and people of lower socioeconomic statuses. These issues began to rise between the Jeffersonian and Jacksonian democracy from the start of the American Revolution through the Civil War. During this time period, a vast number of changes were implemented into the system of democracy, many of which still remain active today. Democracy created a variety of conflicts between the “Whigs” and the Democrats during the mid-1830s. These battles were fueled by their different beliefs regarding the economic issues of policy, political leaders and different class powers. “Like the Federalist of the 1790s, the Whigs wanted a political world dominated by men of ability and wealth” (Henretta 313). The majority of Whigs were yeomen whites who did not support the power of democrats who were mainly planters (313). These planters were driven by the sole purpose to acquire property and combine man labor with the world’s resources, they did this through slavery. These men believed they possessed the right to replace government if they felt it could not properly protect them and their property (Farless lecture). Most southern planters began to blame their short-comings on...
Words: 1561 - Pages: 7
