Free Essay

The Filibuster

In: Historical Events

Submitted By barnesG
Words 1275
Pages 6
The Filibuster
Name:
Course:
Date:

The Filibuster: Definition This means use of obstructive or irregular strategies by a member of a legislative assembly to stop or prevent the adoption of a motion generally liked or forcing a decision not accepted by the majority (Hornby, 1974).
Origin:
The word originates from a Dutch word vrijbuiter “pirate”, including the Spanish term filibuster, “freebooting”. The originate use of this word filibuster dates back to ancient Rome and the use of this word has been common in states like Australia and England. The use of this term come to light when it was used to label a senator who kept hostage his colleague through overtaking legislation. In the seventeenth century, flee-booster assaulted the Spanish provinces in the Caribbean and earned a terrible reputation. They were additionally called pirates and freebooters (Belmont, 1981). The stuff these flee-booster stole was called goods. In the end an additional syllable wormed its way into the word, and flee-boosters got to be called filibuster. It additionally tackled political significance in the 1850s. Filibusters were individuals from the United States who went to Central America and the Spanish West Indies keeping in mind the end goal to wrongfully support revolution.
History of Filibuster
1890 marked the first time the word filibuster was used to mean the way or strategy for talking for a long time to interfere with the normal running of senate business. The initial Filibuster in U.S. Senate history started on March 5, 1841, over the issue of the terminating of Senate printers, and kept going six days. Since the time that, government officials have cherished delays or abhorred them depending on which side of the battle they were on. Defenders contend the delay secures the privilege to free discourse and keeps the Senate lion's share from steamrolling the minority, in this way guaranteeing basic enactment gets an adequate airing before being pushed through. Others fighting the practice has become wild, leaving bills gridlocked in an oft-quarrelling Senate and slowing down imperative votes in favour of absolutely factional pick up (Roche, 1891). Dwindle Fenn, GOP advisor and previous Senate helper, called delays the "oppression of the minority."
Arguments for keeping, modifying, or ending the 'filibuster
Keeping filibuster has some benefits especially to the minority group in the assembly and hence conservatives should kind off preserve filibuster. According to R-Neb, it encourages cool debating and cautious doing of reviews, also it helps guard against tyranny of the majority group in the assembly, another reason he gives is that it limits or reduces the scope of the government ensuring that every voice is taken into consideration. Removal of filibuster may lead to kind of senator classes that is super senators and second class senators. Assisting the procedure for allotments bills, yet not for other enactment, will give congresspersons on the Appropriations Committee and in initiative a greater number of rights than their partners; they'll require just an absolute minimum of votes to push their needs. Also no senator will stay as a majority forever. Getting rid of filibuster will mean that favour trading is enabled and this will encourage backroom trade.
Democrats say the late surge in filibuster demonstrates Republicans are manhandling the framework to convey the administrative procedure to an end. Advocates of changing the filibuster have proposed various changes, from bringing back the "talking" filibuster to permitting delays just on genuine votes and not on whether to open deliberation enactment—but rather Reid and other Democratic representatives have yet to define precisely the progressions they support. Shields of the filibuster alert against changing the framework, saying that the delay is a critical security of minority-gathering rights. They say the filibuster backtracks to the authors' desire to make a national government with deliberately built balanced governance and that increasing the procedure debilitates the very condition of American majority rules system. A few Republicans call the thought of demolishing the delay a Democratic power grab.
The plot of Mr. Smith Goes to Washington spins, obviously, around the delay. In that time period, the Senate couldn't move onto different business if the delay was not determined - that is to say, the filibusters needed to really be talking keeping in mind the end goal to keep up the delay. This changed when Robert Byrd was Senate Majority Leader. Byrd (and his gathering) founded a "two-track" framework, changing the standards so that the Senate could desert the delayed movement and proceed onward to different business. This change was made in light of the fact that delays were seen as valuable, however excessively obstructionist, and Byrd felt the Senate required the adaptability to have the capacity to proceed onward to different things. In an unintended outcome, minorities of late have found that Byrd basically made it allowed to delay. In the event that an adequately huge minority doesn't need something to happen, they stop it, and the Senate apparently proceeds onward. While before the minority just had restricted postponing power - and likely paid a political cost for so clearly discouraging the Senate's business - now the minority can uncertainly delay the crap out of everything with no political cost. All it takes is the capacity to hold your 41-part coalition together, and all the lion's share can do is whimper about conceptual obstructionism. In light of what has been said, the delay is a valuable apparatus for the minority to have, on the grounds that it welcomes investigation of the moment enactment, yet we have to return to the one-track framework in which the minority can't uncertainly hinder the lion's share.
The filibuster is a long-held Senate convention that permits a minority to hold up enactment. To override a delay requires three fifths of the larger part (60 votes) to vote for closure discuss on a bill, which is called cloture. Movies like 1939's Mr. Smith Goes to Washington portray the delay as a sensational occasion, obliging representatives to talk relentless to develop the "civil argument." But that kind of "talking delay" has been supplanted with less emotional systems like the cloture vote, with a delay being more virtual than genuine. Once an infrequently utilized administrative strategy the delay was conjured about 70 times in the 112th Congress.
Conclusion
I believe that the filibuster is very important in assembly legislation and possibility of compromise is a weak justification for eliminating the filibuster. For one, the President’s relations with Congress, even with Members of his own party, are reportedly poor. Also, since Republicans took control of the House in 2011, aside from emergency legislation like the 2011 Budget Control Act, there hasn’t been major legislation (like an overhaul of the tax code or entitlement reform), so there should be little expectation of them in the future.
Regardless of the fact that the Republicans were certain that they had the constantly deceptive "changeless dominant part," the filibuster ought to stay right where it is. Throughout the years, notwithstanding mishandle, Members have kept it set up to ensure the privileges of the political minority, which is the embodiment of the Senate. On the off chance that that is lost, what's the most exceedingly awful that could happen?

References
Belmont, J. (1981). The filibusters. Bognor Regis: New Horizon.
Hornby, A. S., Cowie, A. P., & Lewis, J. W. (1974). Oxford advanced learner's dictionary of current English. London: Oxford University Press.
Roche, J. J., & Crockett, D. (1891). The story of the filibusters. London: T.F. Unwin
Epperson, J. L., & Liberty County Historical Commission (Tex.). (2010). Filibusters, pirates & privateers of the early Texas Coast. Hardin, Tex: Liberty County Historical Commission.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Difficult Conversations Final Paper Conflict Resolutions

...Final Paper Difficult Conversations By Wayne State University School of Social Work Social Work 6991 Professor Pauline Everette Fall 2012 Conflict is everywhere we go, at home, school, church in the community and especially at work. How we decide to handle the conflict at hand will determine whether we strengthen the relationship or break it up. Each situation can be dealt with in a way that can bring healing instead of animosity and further pain. Most of the time conflict is looked at as a negative experience that most people refuse to be a part of because of their own lack of conflict management skills; but if both parties are willing to sit down and discuss the issue, there is a possibility of a positive resolution. If conflict is dealt with properly and successfully from the beginning then there will be a greater understanding from each individual involved and an increased likelihood of unity as well as an improved relationship. In this paper I will discuss difficult conversations I had with my son, John, (name change for confidentiality), when he was 16 years old, who is now 26. As a teenager I expect him to go through teenage issues, I expect conflict which is a natural part our interactions, and disagreements, but as a parent I must effectively address these conflicts/disagreements to improve our relationship and to promote growth. After experiencing these issues with John I have a to react based on the different individual personalities...

Words: 2030 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Senate Filibusters

...November Senate Filibusters The United States government can be noted as being one of the most intricate representative democracies in the world. The key to its success lies within the three branch system. Under this model each branch has separate and independent powers as well as certain areas of responsibility so that no branch has substantial power over another. Of the three branches, the Legislative sector is further divided into the House of Representatives, and the Senate. The idea of a bicameral legislature has proven effective, as they tend to act as counter balances to each other. The members of the House of Representatives are more responsive to the needs of the population of the district which they represent, whereas the Senate, (equally represented with two members from each state) tends to represent needs of the entire individual state which they represent. The Senate is often referred to as being the "world's greatest deliberative body"; which in effect can result in stalemates. In this tradition, both Republican and Democratic majorities have used the filibuster, or its threat, to prevent Senate votes on carefully selected pieces of legislation or nominations. The use of filibuster legislation has become increasingly popular within the last twenty-years. Although the term ‘gridlock’ gets thrown around with a bad connotation I feel it’s somewhat necessary when debating significant issues. As Rawls stated throughout his article, “The filibuster is a perfect candidate...

Words: 534 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Filibusters

...By definition a filibuster is an irregularly speech or debate to purposefully disrupt the passing of a bill. The process of a filibuster is an ability only to members of the Senate due to its smaller size than the House of Representatives. Senators who do not agree with a bill can threaten to give a filibuster which means they will talk, debate, discuss nearly anything without interruption until the bill being discussed gets “tabled,” or killed, in the Senate. In addition to killing a bill, filibusters can also be used to stop the nomination of a presidential candidate, this form of a filibuster is called a “nuclear option.” Filibusters can go on for any length of time so long as cloture vote is not enacted. A cloture vote is when a minimum of 60 Senators agree and vote for a speaker to end their filibuster....

Words: 477 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Reach Deal Modifying Filibuster Rules

...INTRO The Senate approved a deal Thursday that will keep the chamber’s long-standing 60-vote threshold for halting a filibuster but streamline some of the chamber’s more cumbersone procedure. The rules changes would reduce yet not eliminate the number of times opponents — usually minority-party Republicans these days — can use filibusters, procedural tactics which can derail legislation and which can be stopped only by the votes of 60 of the 100 senators. TRY BRIDGE-ISSUE AGREEMENT Too often over the past four years, a single Senator or a handful of Senators has been able to unilaterally block or delay bipartisan legislation for the sole purpose of making a political Sentor Merkley said in a statement: "These steps are modest, and don't address the core problem of the secret, silent filibuster, but they do include some important elements, providing flexibility on the motion to proceed and speeding up the confirmation process on nominations. Instead of trying to complete overhaul the filibuster process, the Senate has agree to relatively minor issues before moving on to tacking other more complex issues with filibuster process CONCLUSION Reid and McConnell's agreement keeps the basics of the filibuster in place but limits any one senator's ability to stall a bill's initial movement to be considered on the floor. The agreement will allow uncontroversial federal nominations to happen more quickly, except for Cabinet and Supreme Court candidates. It also can speed up the pace...

Words: 293 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Animated Disney's Wall-E-Filibuster Films

... The animated Disney pixel film wall-e was released/made in 2008 and was great success and was able to warm the hearts of many people. In this movie we saw that wall-e was left alone with nothing, but his pet cockroach on earth, after the human left earth because it wasn't safe to live there anymore. In this film we know that wall-e is a solar powered machine, unlike some robots that need maintenance wall-e can keep going by resting in the sun. Everyday wall-e wakes up and collect the trash that the humans left behind and crushes them into small cubes to make trash skyscrapers, like in the story of Noah, God made Noah build a boat, so Jesus can start start again and more people can believe in him because most people just forgot about him, like they did on planet earth. Now I'm going to write about how both worlds uninhabitable. Wall-e was the only one left on earth and was basically assigned a job to clean earth up. Wall-e took his job seriously he would wake up every morning and have to stack cubes or rubbish and make big buildings and skyscraper to take some of the population away. This is similar to Noah's ark, God had flooded earth so it was uninhabitable to live, he did this to so people would believe, in him again because they were very disrespectful and they would take things granted, like the people did on earth (genesis1:2 "and the earth was form and void and darkness was upon the face of the deep"). Wall-e would take things from the junk yard, that interested him...

Words: 1347 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Pros And Cons Of A Unified Government

...also provides advantages for the use of the filibuster. Under unified government, there is less ideological discord between the president and Congress. Some scholars argue that this allows for a shorter confirmation process and a lesser likelihood of obstruction than in a divided government. This is because the majority and the President belong to the same political Party and have similarly rooted views. The likelihood of presidents to block legislation and of presidential failure to pass legislation...

Words: 632 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Research Paper On Unified Government

...Congressional legislation, vise-versa, when there are minimal ideological differences between the legislative and executive branches. The larger a party majority in Congress is, the less likely it is for a gridlock to occur. The majority can suppress the minority and easily push their own agendas forward. Like wise, the filibuster is less menacing under the reign of a unified government with a large majority. Minorities often use filibusters to assert their power, however, with an overpowering large majority the ruling party can overturn the filibuster with a cloture....

Words: 402 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Budget Reform

...shut down the federal government in their fight for spending cuts. Even after reaction President Bill Clinton helped restore his political position, which had plummeted after the 1994 elections, the Republican Party continued to insist on spending cuts for the remainder of Clinton's term, leaving little opportunity to do much more that to try to reduce their demands” (CNN 2013) An additional cause for budget issues, previously, once there’s been break by using a particular tactic, that particular practice can become normal. A very good example is a filibuster. In history, there was a time when members of the Senate were reluctant to use the filibuster frequently. Reserved for high-profile issues such as civil rights, in the belief that a majority should normally be sufficient to pass legislation. However, since the 1970s, the filibuster has become a standard for partisan combat. The Senators are threatening or using the filibuster more often, and do so on more mundane issues. As a consequence a supermajority is necessary...

Words: 449 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Minority Leader Roles: The House Of Representatives And The Senate

...The House of Representatives and the Senate each have a Minority Leader and Minority Whip with similar responsibilities. The Minority Leader role is to discuss issues with the majority party, be in charge of minority caucus activities on the chamber floor, and direct debates for the minority. The Minority Whip is responsible for helping the minority leader on the floor, make sure minority party members are present, and count votes (Evans & Michaud, 2015). The majority party in each house of Congress is the Majority Leader and the Majority Whip. The Majority Leader’s role is to be the lead speaker for the majority party during floor debates, to maintain the calendar, and to help the president or speaker with program development, policy...

Words: 263 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Government Paper

...Option 2 In the summer of 2013 drama unfolded in the Texas legislature over an abortion bill that was considered during a special session. Texas Senator Wendy Davis and her colleagues attempted to filibuster the bill as the session came to a close, leading Governor Perry to call another special session. This incident is great example to show the Texas politics and government in action through the Formal and Informal power of governor, the roles of the Lieutenant governor and Speaker of the House, role of Grassroots activism and Interest groups, Legislative tactics and rules, and the politics of law making in Texas. The governor has many roles throughout the legislature. The firmest part of a governor’s capacity for leadership involves handling legislature matters. The governor does not have any direct lawmaking authority. However, according to our text, Practicing Texas politics on page 319 it is said, “the legislative power is exercised through four major functions authorized by the Texas Constitution. These four major functions are, Delivering messages to the legislature, signing bills and concurrent resolutions, vetoing bills and concurrent resolutions and calling special sessions of the legislature.” The Texas governor has less formal powers than most other governors. Some Formal powers of the governor include: qualified veto, line item veto, “State of the state” address, appointment powers, call special sessions of legislature, plan powers, budget powers, law enforcement...

Words: 1417 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

To What Extent Is Congress a Broken Branch

...To what extent is congress a broken branch? As we go into the second year of the 114th congress it is clear that now more than ever there is a clear divide between the parties ideologically and socially, affecting the efficiency of congress. With the media having an even greater influence than ever, the general public are being influenced to view the opposite party as adversaries in commerce rather than comrades. Congress’ apparent neglection to perform their duties of representation, oversight and legislation, is under noticeable scrutiny form the public. Whether the bureaucratic system is altogether faltering and letting down the American people is still to be argued. Obama’s limitations are resultant of a Republican Majority in both the House and the Senate. With a Democrat in executive power and a Republican run legislative body, the legislation process is far less effective than in previous years, with either side causing restrictions for the other. Only 115 bills have been able to pass through and become enacted laws within the last year. In comparison to 385 when there was a Democratic majority in the House. In perspective, triple the amount of bills passed through the 111th congress than through the current one. One could argue that bills do not need to be passed through congress at a substantial rate, however this is congresses way of representing the wishes of their people and therefore an extremely important duty to perform. The conflict between the Republicans...

Words: 1979 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Right to Work Laws

...HR 360 Research Paper – Right to Work April 18, 2015 RIGHT TO WORK Introduction When the labor union movement began in the early twentieth century, the goal was to safeguard the rights of labor and putting an end to management’s almost cruel and unrestricted power. Prior to the 1930s and 40s, when most of the pro-labor legislation was passed, management was free to treat workers as it saw fit, abusing the labor with only the economic bottom line in mind. Unions became a powerful and necessary weapon for labor in the battle for rights within the workplace. Over time, federal protection for union organizing and collective bargaining allowed unions to be more powerful and politically unfair. The rights of individuals seemed to be in jeopardy, as the collective fate of the union began to take on greater importance than those of the individual workers. Because of this, many states have established right-to-work laws, which make it illegal for unions and employers to only hire union members. These laws tend to be argued, the unions believe that they weaken labor’s power, while supporters of these laws believe that they safeguard the rights of individual workers. History The unions’ power began to set in the 1930s and 40s, with the passage of the National Labor Relations Act of 1935 (NLRA), which “provided employees the right to bargain collectively for wages, benefits and better working conditions” (Henderson, 2006), for the first time in U.S. history. There have...

Words: 2175 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

House Sit-In: The Parallel Rating In Congress

...see many highly respected House Members sprawled across the House floor disrespecting the rules of the institution. Sparked by the tragic mass murder in Orlando, the Senate held a filibuster the prior week. Senator Murphy of Connecticut showed his leadership and passion on the issue when he stood on the Senate floor for over fourteen hours requesting a vote on the issue. This act by the Senator is justifiable and within his power as a member of the Senate. I view this event as the House trying to rally with the Senate. The primary purpose of the sit in was the same as the Senate’s filibuster - request a vote on gun bills. The house sit in; however, is not a power representatives have. Representatives took control of the floor as people in the gallery would scream and yell after somebody would speak as if it were a baseball game. The atmosphere within the chamber and its galleries was of utter disrespect to the nature of the body. Speaker Paul Ryan showed his lack of leadership and control over the body by not shutting down the sit in. The extent of his efforts in shutting it down was shutting off the microphone system and turning off the cameras. I worry that such a stunt will happen again when one party does not agree with the other side, and will attempt to take over the floor resembling a filibuster interfering with the procedure of the...

Words: 829 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Ron Paul's Fight Against Big Government

...There are way too many to go in-depth on all of them, but two stand out as being his most important. One of the most important and talked about is his opposition to the U.S Patriot Act. The U.S Patriot act is an ironically unpatriotic statement that allows for the mass collection of phone numbers, conversations, and miscellaneous information on U.S citizens. As a libertarian, Rand Paul vehemently opposed this act. So much, that he was willing to filibuster the reauthorization of it and the election of CIA director John Brennen. For 13 hours he spoke, going over all key issues of why this reauthorization was a horrendous idea. Hilariously, Rand Paul wasn’t even supposed to filibuster that day, as he was under the impression the vote was the next day. After the lengthy speech, he stated that “My legs hurt, my feet hurt, everything hurts” (Louis Nelson). His filibuster managed to rally a ton of republicans behind his cause and even one democrat. In the end, he was unable to block the election of John Brennen. However, the legacy of his filibuster continues. He gained tens of thousands of supporters, notoriety in congress, and the opportunity to launch his presidential campaign with some...

Words: 1262 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Civil Rights Movement

...Before the Civil Rights Act of 1964, segregation in the United States was commonly practiced in many of the Southern and Border States. This segregation while supposed to be separate but equal, was hardly that. Blacks in the South were discriminated against repeatedly while laws did nothing to protect their individual rights. In May 26, 1956, a few Florida A&M students got on the bus to a short trip to downtown Tallahassee, where these two young black woman wanted to seat in front of the bus rather than stand, for the bus was full and no seats were available in the back. When the driver notice that these to black woman were sitting in the front of the bus beside a white woman; he immediately pulled over the bus and told them to get up. When the young ladies kindle said if you refund us we will get off the bus, the driver said no and called the cops, though the white woman they sat next to made no objection. Which further leads to them being arrested and charged with incite a riot, After this story made headlines in the Sunday paper many people such as minster Metz Rollins was hoping for the black community to act with determination and sprit as others did in Montgomery, Alabama a few months prior. (Rabby,10-11) Rev. C. K. Steele and Robert Saunders representing the NAACP began talks while blacks started boycotting the city's buses. This boycott was similar to that in the Montgomery Boycott with Rosa Parks. Former bus patrons began a car pool lasting through May 26 of 1957, several...

Words: 2390 - Pages: 10