Premium Essay

The First Crusade

Submitted By
Words 1732
Pages 7
The crusades a number of holy wars fought in the 11th century by ordinary men. They killed and lived for the cross which they all bared inside. They explored the Middle East, encountered by blasphemers of the church, and exchanged with only the steel of their swords. It was at the closing end of the 11thcentury, 1070 where all the chaos began. Western Europe had emerged as a powerful nation but was still less powerful than the Byzantine Empire. The Byzantine were from the eastern part of Europe and were mostly Christian. The Byzantine Empire was losing control though over some territory. Who was taking it? The Seljuk Turks commanded by a sultan, who ordered them to take the land. The Byzantine were defeated in a battle at 1071 which …show more content…
During the October of 1147 the Turks crushed Conrad’s forces in Doryaeum. Doryaeum was a site of great victory for the Crusaders in the first Crusade. After this horrific defeat King Louis and King Conrad assembled their armies. They did this at Jerusalem where they had finished the first Crusade. The two kings decided to attack a Syrian stronghold called Damaseus. The ruler of Damaseus had to call for aid from General Zangi. Crusaders’ blood was spilled that day for the combined Muslim forces could not be stopped. General Zangi added another stronghold to his expanding empire. The Muslims had won this Crusade, but will they win the …show more content…
They were swatted away like flies by the Muslims and their armies. There was a seventh Crusade, though, led by Thibault IV of Chapagne. They captured Jerusalem but only for a short period of time. It was taken back less than three years later by forces enlisted by the Egyptian sultan in 1244. In 1249 the eighth Crusade was launched by King Louis IX of France. He led men to Egypt but they were defeated and so ended the eighth Crusade. As time went on the Crusaders helped their allies just as Genghis Khan. There were other Crusades but those were small in comparison to others. Support for these Crusades was soon no more by the 16th century . This was because of the decline of Papal authority.
The Crusades were a horrid ordeal for all who were involved. Three things were always present in the Crusades. Exploration allowed the Crusaders go to the Middle East. Encounter is another one because without this there would never have been a Crusade. The last is exchange. Without ever exchanging with Muslims the Crusades would have been nothing. As anyone can see, the Crusades were a huge thing that changed the world. Whether that change was bad or good we will never

Similar Documents

Free Essay

The First Crusade

...The First Crusade   A mass of men, numbering roughly 100,000, marched out of Europe and toward Jerusalem and were victorious against masses of Islamic armies. In July of 1099AD, Jerusalem would fall out of the hands of the Turks for the first time in centuries, and the First Crusade would also serve to frame the make-up of nobility across Europe and help shape the middle ages altogether. The view of the Crusades, like many major events of history, are often known without being truly understood. In the modern era, the Crusades are seen almost as an afterthought, and used as a tool to rationalize and justify relativism in general. In fact, Islam had spread deep to the west, swallowing Spain and expanding into southern France. Much of Europe was in a state of subtle chaos. The Normans held the British Isles, and what we know as Germany today was in a constant state of resistance against any crown that managed power. Spain was pushing against its Muslim occupiers bit by bit, but its struggles would span centuries before and after all of the major crusades would be undertaken. Each of these, along with other events of the era, put considerable pressure on the ability of the Byzantine Empire to govern its own borders, a task made all the more difficult when compounded by pressures from the Seljuk Turks to east. It could be said then, that the call made by Alexius I Comnenus (or Alexios I Komnenos), the eastern emperor, for help from the Church, was all the more......

Words: 1256 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The First Crusade (1099)

...The First Crusade (1096–1099) was the first of a number of crusades that attempted to recapture the Holy Lands, called by Pope Urban II in 1095. It started as a widespread pilgrimage in western Christendom and ended as a military expedition by Roman Catholic Europe to regain the Holy Lands taken in the Muslim conquests of the Levant (632–661), ultimately resulting in the recapture of Jerusalem in 1099. It was launched on 27 November 1095 by Pope Urban II with the primary goal of responding to an appeal from Byzantine Emperor Alexios I Komnenos, who requested that western volunteers come to his aid and help to repel the invading Seljuk Turks from Anatolia. An additional goal soon became the principal objective—the Christian reconquest of the sacred city of Jerusalem and the Holy Land and the freeing of the Eastern Christians from Muslim rule....

Words: 307 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The First Crusade Essay

...Bohemond of Taranto are the four leaders here engaging in The First Crusade. The “People's Crusade” left shortly before the four main groups of Crusaders. Groups of the civilian crusaders massacred jewish towns and caused crisis in relationships. ● When arriving in Constantinople, Alexius made the leaders swear an oath that they would give authority to him once any land was conquered. All of the leaders except Bohemond resisted. Throughout the next two years hundreds of men,women,and children were slaughtered ● Once their goal was achieved many soldiers rushed home but several stayed to govern the new land. There were four large settlements called Crusader states. Muslims also...

Words: 453 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

First Wave Of The Crusades Essay

...1. First the crusade was in the near East and involved in Anatolia, Levant, and Palestine. They had a military that was aimed to reclaim the Holy Land in which the Muslims conquest had acquired. Pope Urban ll launched the crusades in hopes of fulfilling the 1095 Byzantine Emperor Alexius l request which was gaining help of the western volunteers and to come to his aid. 2. There were many different players during the first wave of the Crusades including Godfrey of Bouillon, the Medieval Frankish knight which in fact became the first ruler of the Kingdom of Jerusalem. And after Frankish became King he abandoned the title as king. So crusaders had decisive victory. 3. With the newfound of Jerusalem the crusaders founded four other crusader states....

Words: 476 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Reasons for First Crusade Win

...‘To what extent was superior military leadership the main reason for the success of the First Crusade?’ The First Crusade was won once Jerusalem and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre had been captured and the crusading vow had hence been fulfilled. Superior military leadership was a huge factor and did play a very large, considerable role in the victory of the First Crusade. However, there are many other contributing factors which influenced the triumph, and to state that superior military leadership was the sole reason is quite the assumption, and a broader view of the other elements should be regarded. One of the factors is the superior military leadership as stated by the question. Following the failure of the First Wave, led by Peter the Hermit and band of illiterate, incompetent peasants, the Second Wave was structured, organised and lead by Noblemen. They provided key figures such as Bohemond, Prince of Taranto and Adhemar, Bishop of Le Puy, and this offered the Crusaders guidance, tactics and strategy to their battles. Their strategies of aggressive, merciless fighting led them to successful sieges at Nicaea, Antioch and Jerusalem. Arguably, without the leadership which the First Crusade received they wouldn’t have been victorious due to guidance and battle strategies which they offered. It is evident, how crucial the leaders were to the cause, as upon Adhemar, Bishop of Le Puy’s death, many Crusaders mourned their loss over a great spell. The Crusaders knew how......

Words: 972 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

'The First Crusades: The Siege Of Ma Arra'

...The First Crusades lasted from 1096-1099. The “Siege of Ma’rrat” occurred during the months of October to December in 1098. It was the most infamous event that occurred in the city of Ma’arrat al-Numa. The city is located in the northwestern part of Syria and is also referred to as Marrat al-Numaan. The Siege of Ma’rrat or Ma’arra (also known as the Massacre of Ma’arra) was led by two knights Bohemond of Taranto and Raymond de Saint Gilles. Their armies were called the “Crusaders” who were mostly French and Norman knights sent by Pope Urban II to conduct raids on the city of Ma’rrat and seize the Holy Land from the Muslims. The Crusaders built a siege tower which enabled them to seize the top of the walls of the city on December...

Words: 279 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Pope Urban II: The First Crusade

...1. November, 1095 Pope Urban II calls the first Crusade In the town of Clermont ,central France, the Pope has called upon the knights of France. This was done in hopes that they would journey to the Holy Land and liberate the city of Jerusalem. He called on the knights in a response to a request from Emperor Alexios I who wanted to stop the invading Turks from Anatolia. 2. June, 1097 The Crusaders have taken Nicaea The Crusaders along with serfs, and peasants from the Christian world have taken the walled city of Nicaea from Kilij Arslan I, who is a Seljuk sultan. The Crusaders reached Constantinople then crossed into Asia Minor. Then advanced to Nicaea where they then took control of the city. 3. June, 1098 Crusaders just broke into Antioch...

Words: 521 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

How Valid Is the View That the First Crusade Succeeded Primarily Due to the Splits in Islam

...How valid is the view that the first Crusade succeeded to primarily due to the splits in Islam The first crusade was seen as a miracle that had never been accomplished before with the crusaders managing to stay alive on a numerous number of occasions especially after the siege of Antioch by the Muslims where the crusaders had their motivation utilised after the discovery of the holy lance where this was said to bolster their confidence and defeat the Turks. Also the luck the crusaders had for example on the first crusade the crusaders were able to defeat and surprise Kilij Arslan forces due to the failure of the people crusade where this undermined the Turks opinion on the crusaders forces. And lastly another factor for the success of the crusades was due to the piety of the crusaders such as the monks and the discovery of the holy lance with the crusaders wanting to liberate Jerusalem for the infidel. The splits in Islam can be seen as one of the main reasons why the crusaders managed to achieve the unpresented success in the first crusade. Although not know to the crusaders at the time Islam in the region was divided with the Sunni base in Baghdad with the Abbasid caliphate and a Shiite Fatimid based in Cairo Egypt. Theses splits actually helping the crusaders make alliances with the Fatimid’s however this did not last long. The splits in Islam can be seen as hindering the progress of defence of the crusades especially within the areas such as the crusader states where......

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

‘to What Extent Was Superior Military Leadership the Main Reason for the Success of the First Crusade?

...reason for the success of the First Crusade?’ In 1099 the First Crusade had succeeded their objective and captured the Holy City of Jerusalem. The use of military leadership provided by key figures including Bohemond of Taranto, Raymond of Toulouse and Adhemar of Le Puy were considered a main reason for the crusaders success. Due to the failure of the First Wave it was considered by the Muslims that the crusaders will no longer be a threat to them. Strong Military leadership was a large part for as to why the First Crusade was such a success. Without strong leadership from Bohemond and Adhemar leading the troops, the Western forces would have most likely fallen apart and turned against one another and their Eastern allies. This was key during the Battle of Dorylaeum where the crusaders were confronted with a barbaric and alien type of warfare, this is where Bohemond showed his true light as a good leader as he was able to keep his forces disciplined and in check, longs enough for Godfrey of Bouillon and the other princes to come and help them. In the crusade Adhemar was always recognized as the spiritual leader of the crusade. He fought a crucial role in the Battle of Dorylaeum and was responsible for sustaining the morale during the Siege of Antioch by doing several religious rites include fasting and special observances of holy days. However it could be considered that good military tactics were a key reason for why the First Crusade was a success, as the......

Words: 981 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Which of the Following Was More Important in the Success of the First Crusade: • Muslim Disunity • Strengths of the Crusader Army

...the following was more important in the success of the first crusade: • Muslim disunity • Strengths of the Crusader army The first crusade’s success came as a surprise following the failure of the Peoples Crusade, this was due to many factors not only Muslim disunity and strengths within the Crusader army but also Byzantine support and Crusader motivation, that weren’t previously factors for the peoples crusade. however it is debatable which is the most important reason for the success, Muslim disunity certainly contributed to the success of the crusaders, however this was only a part of the overall reasons for their victories, as the crusaders themselves had many strengths such as strong leadership. Whilst this is true i think that the overall reason for success was indeed the muslims disunity as they made themselves easy opponents to defeat. In the years of the crusade there was a divide within the muslims, the Sunni and Shia Muslims hated each other more than they hated the Christian Crusaders. This led to internal problems and wars, and the many leaders that this affected used their armies against each other. This was in itself a distraction from what could have been used as a strong, united Muslim army against the Christian crusaders. This has been recognised by many historians as a big weakness with the Muslims as T. Asbridge says ‘Had the muslims of the near east united in the face of the first crusade it could not possibly have prevailed.’ In 1097 there......

Words: 808 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Crusades Dbq Essay

...The crusades were a series of military campaigns during the medieval england against the muslims of the middle east. Are the crusades more positive or negative? Well i think it is more negative than positive because the crusades are harmful.There was a lot of negativity in the middle century caused by the 4 crusades. There is many thing that the crusades cause so that why there was so much negatively.Document 5 shows how much negativity there is by stating “ first the struggle between ISlam and Christendom and the example of persecution set by christian kings and prelates (bishops) left an inheritance of deep bitterness; relations between muslims and there christians and jewish subjects worsened.( Unknown source).These details are important because the first struggle was between...

Words: 530 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

History A2 Crusades - Economic Factors

...This extract illustrates a clear example of economic and cultural motives from the first crusade, as the knights “motives were in part genuinely religious,” which then brings in the concept of holy war. In Pope Urban II’s speech in Clermont he had given a cultural motive of “whoever goes to liberate the church of God can substitute this journey for all penance,” this simply states, in return for fighting God’s enemies on earth, a person would receive a spiritual reward, which again supports the cultural motive from this extract. The economic benefits may include “possession of the land they re-conquered.” The historian also explores the contrast between the Byzantine Empire whom respect the Arabs due to similar cultures and way of life, to the ‘Turkish barbarians.’ Another brief point that is mentioned is the threat Muslims had on the Western Christians, as they “could not share the Byzantine’s tolerance and sense of security.” The main argument in this extract is that the motives for the first crusade were for economic and cultural motives. The historian briefly discusses “land-hunger.” The inducement of land and profit being held out in the account of Pope Urban’s speech and this broad principle must have motivated some crusaders. There were also economic motives from families, where the inheritance would go to the elder sons, which meant “younger sons had to seek their fortune elsewhere,” this is supported by historian Bryd who also believed this. However historians......

Words: 640 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

How Significant Were the Divisions Among the Latin Leaders in Bringing About the Fall of Jerusalem?

...move away from water, food and other necessities to lead to such a multitude of men to death’. As a result of the lack of resources, death and disease were colossal issues, especially as there was already a lack of men due to a downturn in crusading appeal, leaving the Latin troops somewhat outnumbered. The lack of support lead to momentous failures in the first and second crusade and therefore men not wanting to risk their lives and livelihood for what they believed to be an imminent death. This compared with Saladin, who was only growing in power in the build up to the Battle of Hattin in the year 1187, becoming king of Egypt and seizing control of Damascus. This power is supported within Source 1, where William of Tyre states ‘a man of humble antecedents and lowly station now holds under his control all these kingdoms’. This illuminates the disbelief and frustration the Latins felt at being gradually defeated by Saladin, having no power to reverse the lack of support, lack of money and his rising popularity and power. Having lost a lot of support for the crusade due to the misadventures of the first and second crusades, not even the promise of remission of sins from Pope Urban III aided the rallying of troops and therefore,...

Words: 780 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

1st Crusade

...How successful was the 1st Crusade? The 1st crusade was initiated by the call from Pope Urban II in 1095 to regain the Holy Land of Jerusalem, he promised those that went on this journey a place in heaven. This created one of the bloodiest religious wars in history between the Christian and Muslim worlds. The Christian side was made up of poor, less-advanced, yet savage Franks, and the more civilised Christians from the Byzantium empire in the East. The first major success for the Christians was the Siege of Antioch. On arrival, the defences of the city seemed unstoppable. The franks were truly astonished as they were used to wooden castles and fighting with ineffective weapons, but what they were faced with was 6 mile long stone walls and sharp weapons. Despite this, the Christians managed to get an insider who retrieved information that a large Muslim army was on its way, as well as this they managed to blockade the city in an attempt to weaken their defence. Before the Army had chance to arrive a long but brutal attack was made on Antioch. Once over the walls of Antioch no mercy was shown, it was a bloody battle as anyone in the Christian path was killed and tortured, some were even eaten by some of the most savage cannibalised Franks. Georges Tates believed 'it gave an impression that could never be forgotten'. Following the Siege of Antioch, it was then seen that the 'road to Jerusalem' had opened. After years of minor battles, both successful and unsuccessful the......

Words: 696 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Beowulf A Hero's Journey

...trail of this troll-dam. I guarantee you: she will not get away, not to dens under ground nor upland groves nor the ocean floor. She’ll have nowhere to fall to. Endure your troubles to-day. Bear up and be the man I expect you to be.” Beowulf could not set aside his duty and obligation, though he knew full well the suffering and pain that might result from his actions. Thus, Beowulf is a portrait of an idealized warrior because he exhibits a sense of obligation, emanating from his swelling honor and integrity. The obligation felt by Beowulf as a result of his honor and integrity parallels the convictions held by many fighters during the first crusade. These convictions become obvious in Pope Urban II’s speech at the Council of Clermon. Pope Urban II plays on a warrior’s sense of obligation to entice mighty medieval men and nobles to join the crusade. For instance, Urban II likens a warrior’s duty to the work of a shepherd saying, “You are called shepherds; see that you do not act as hirlings. But be true shepherds, with your crooks always in your hands. Do not go to sleep, but guard on all sides the flock committed to you.” In the Bible, Jesus is often referred to as the “good shepherd”, watching over and guiding his sheep. Thus, Urban II’s speech hints that medieval men almost have a Christ-like obligation to defend the Holy Land. It could also be argued Beowulf exemplified this Christ-like obligation because of his willingness to suffer, complimenting his honor and......

Words: 1827 - Pages: 8