Premium Essay

The Foundations of Henri Fayol's Administration

In: Business and Management

Submitted By iamjerome
Words 11033
Pages 45
The foundations of Henri Fayol’s administrative theory

Daniel A. Wren David Ross Boyd Professor Emeritus and Curator, Harry W. Bass Business History Collection, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, USA Arthur G. Bedeian Boyd Professor, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA John D. Breeze Independent Scholar and Business Owner/Manager, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Keywords
Management theory, History

Abstract
Among modern scholars and students there is an increasing distance between the fundamenta l thoughts of early management writers and contemporary , often secondary , accounts of how these pioneers develope d their ideas. This shortcomin g can be remedied by seeking original sources from when a pioneer’s ideas were being formulated and from the context within which this occurred. We examine examples of how others have furthered our understandin g of management history by the discovery and translation of pioneerin g writings and present a rare, out-of-prin t translation and a previousl y untranslate d and unpublishe d presentatio n from the French pioneer, Henri Fayol. These presentation s to his colleague s in the mineral industr y reveal Fayol’s early reflection s as they would later evolve into his classica l book, Administratio n Industriell e et Ge Ârale. Âne

Management Decision 40/9 [2002 ] 906±918 # MCB UP Limited [ISSN 0025-1747] [DOI 10.1108/0025174021044110 8]

As management historians, we are seldom able to trace the formative thinking of our field’s major contributors, especially its founders. McMahon and Carr (1999, p. 228) noted the ``increasing distance between students and scholars of today and the early writers in the development of management thought . . . The current generation of students are reading less of the actual writings of the early scholars and more what those writing current texts are attributing to...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Henri Fayol, Practitioner and Theoretician – Revered and Reviled

...The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/1751-1348.htm Henri Fayol, practitioner and theoretician – revered and reviled Mildred Golden Pryor and Sonia Taneja Department of Marketing and Management, Texas A&M University-Commerce, Commerce, Texas, USA Abstract Purpose – Fayol’s theories were the original foundation for management as a discipline and as a profession. Also Fayol was the first to advocate management education. Yet he has critics who revile him (or at least disparage his work) as well as followers who respect and revere him. This paper intends to enlighten today’s practitioners and academicians about the relevance and value of Fayol’s theories today. Design/methodology/approach – The paper addresses Fayol’s contributions as well as the disparagement and the reverence. It compares Fayol’s work with that of Follett, Mintzberg, Taylor, and Porter. In addition, it demonstrates the original and current interpretation and application of his theories. Finally, it indicates the alignment of Fayol’s theories with strategic leadership and management. Findings – Fayol’s theories are valuable and relevant for organizational leaders because Fayol was a practitioner who documented theories that worked best for him and his co-workers. While there are those who criticize Fayol’s theories, there are many others who respect them and find them useful as academicians and as practitioners. The theory of management functions......

Words: 7742 - Pages: 31

Premium Essay

Henri Fayol

...Henri Fayol was a French mining engineer and director of mines who had developed a general theory of business administration.  He was one of the most influential contributors to modern theories of management. He also identified 5 functions and 14 general principles of management in the early 19th century. These functions and principles were based on his experience and observations and were made for general administration purposes. While today’s economy may be more service oriented, one would feel the management functions set down by Fayol are still very relevant. Many of these are considered to be common sense and constitutional to sound management. These functions are: * Planning * Organising * Directing * Controlling and * Coordinating Planning is basically deciding in advance what to do and how to do it. Planning bridges the gap between where one is and where he/she wants to be. It is the primary function and is present on all levels of management. Organising is a process that commences the implementation of the plans that are set down by clarifying working and reporting relationships and effectively deploying resources towards the attainment of organizational goals. Directing involves leading and motivating employees to perform tasks assigned to them. Motivation and leadership are essential to direction. Leadership is influencing others to do what is asked of them and motivating is getting people to want to do it. Controlling is the......

Words: 1482 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Max0219

...1. Spatig, L 2009, ‘Rediscovering Fayol: Parallels to Behaviouralist Management and Transformational Leadership’, Northeast Business & Economics Association Proceedings, pp. 196-199. (CAMILA AMAYA , 1718053) The article was wrote by Lauren Spatig, Doctoral Student from Fielding Graduate University, she created the article to make a comparison between three big management theories: Fayol’s classical management theory, McGregor’s behavioralist management theory (1966,2006) and Kouzes and Posner’s transformational leadership research (2007). Spatig is always comparing McGregor’s and Kouzes and Posner’s with Fayol’s theory. It is for business management students and people that are interested in different theories related to the way of manage a company. Also to prove that other authors based their theories in Fayol findings. The article was written in an organized and sequence structure. Remembering the audience who was the people she was describing and which ones were their thoughts. Besides, she support all her opinions and conclusions by books and written made by those three authors. Spatig state (2209), that all authors of management theories support their ideas from Fayol theories. In addition, states, that management is base on structuralism, that hierarchical roles in all companies bringing uneven distribution of power. However if the task are well distribute the power will be even and employees will fill......

Words: 2594 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Administration

...m...

Words: 5114 - Pages: 21

Premium Essay

British Journal Od Business

...portrayed in contemporary texts invariably emerges as a caricature of a much more insightful, complex, visionary and rounded management thinker. This study re-examines Fayol’s personal and career history, as well as the arguments presented in his original work, General and Industrial Management. It finds that he was a much more complex and multidimensional figure than his conventional stereotype today, and that his management theories embraced a wider spectrum of approaches and concepts than traditionally identified with the classical management school of thought. In marked contrast to his traditional portrayal, this study uncovers traces of ideas and concepts that anticipated aspects of the human relations movement, systems-based contingency theory, the movement towards greater employee involvement in decision-making and elements of knowledge management. Henri Fayol, the French industrialist and management thinker of the early twentieth century, has long been acknowledged as a founding father of the classical management school of thought. Throughout the twentieth century to the present day, his ideas have been acknowledged and critiqued by management text authors and teachers to several generations of managers in business and government. Most contemporary management writers refer to Fayol’s...

Words: 13494 - Pages: 54

Premium Essay

Management Functiond

...Five functions of management (Fayol) Theories and methodsManagementby Vincent van Vliet - Jun 23, 2014 1981 At the beginning of the last century (1916) the French engineer Henri Fayol created the first principles of the classical management theory. Fayol is classified as the founding father of for example the line and staff organization. Based on his experience as a successful director or a mining company, he developed several theories that are still relevant today. At the time, managers had no formal training. However, the increasing complexity of organizations created a need for professional management. Five functions of management Fayol gained world-wide fame for his 14 general principles of management. He distinguished six general activities for industrial enterprises: technical, commercial, financial, security, accounting and managerial. He defined five functions of management for the management component and these are still seen as relevant to organizations today. These five functions focus on the relationship between personnel and its management and they provide points of reference so that problems can be solved in a creative manner. 1. Planning Planning is looking ahead. According to Fayol, drawing up a good plan of action is the hardest of the five functions of management. This requires an active participation of the entire organization. With respect to time and implementation, planning must be linked to and coordinated on different levels. ......

Words: 797 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Critiques of Theorists

...Frederick Winslow Taylor, also known as the father of the Scientific Movement, was born on March 20, 1856 in Germantown Pennsylvania. Before he was able to attend Harvard University, Taylor’s eyesight suffered severely from studying at nighttime that he had to delay his studies. After serving as an apprentice when his vision improved, Winslow began to work the Midvale Steele Company. While at Midvale, Taylor discovered that “production efficiency in a shop or factory could be greatly enhanced by close observation of the individual worker…”, which became the foundation of scientific management. Scientific management “is a field directly concerned with efficiency” and could also be applied to “administrators in American government and constitutional systems”. Taylor’s theory focused on: the most efficient way for the worker to complete the task, the employer providing proper tools, and good incentives for employee performance that resulted in a “machinelike routine”, which increased productivity. Economist Thornstein Veblen believed that “in dealing with the development and functioning of firms, [he] greatly appreciates the suggested scientific organization of labour and workshops, since it looks capable of increasing technical and general efficiency.” However, Alfred Marshall, a critic of Taylor’s system believed that the “human brain and flexible production systems must exhibit the ability to change, evolve and create” and allows the workers to solve complex problems in an......

Words: 591 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Fayol’s Work from Two Different Points of View

...Henri Fayol and Zero Tolerance Policies Lee SCHIMMOELLER1 Abstract Zero tolerance policies have been increasingly popular in both education and business. Henri Fayol was the one of the earliest and influential thinkers in modern management theory. He defined management as a body of knowledge and defined his 14 administrative principles. It is an interesting exercise to apply Fayol’s teachings to the theory of zero tolerance and attempt to determine what Fayol would think of this new management technique. Keywords: Management, Fayol, zero tolerance, administration. JEL classification: B10, L20. Introduction Zero tolerance is a management technique that is finding its way into many of the administration policies of organizations, including the school systems in the United States. Administrative decrees declare that this organization with have zero tolerance for weapons or illegal drugs, or sexual harassment. Administrators often endorse zero tolerance as it makes a strong statement of organizational discipline and takes little discretion which may be criticized. Critics of zero tolerance claim it is ineffective and leads to random punishments such as 10 year olds suspended for 365 days because her mother packed a knife in her lunch to use to cut up her apple. When she opened her lunchbox she immediately turned it in to her teacher but was still suspended‘(American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force). What would the early theorist of management thought......

Words: 3406 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Functions of Management

...Henri Fayol (born 1841 in Istanbul; died 1925 in Paris) was a French management theorist. Henri Fayol was one of the most influential contributors to modern concepts of management, having proposed that there are five primary functions of management:   1. Planning, 2. Organizing, 3. Commanding, 4. Coordinating, and 5. Controlling (Fayol, 1949, 1987).   Controlling is described in the sense that a manager must receive feedback on a process in order to make necessary adjustments. Fayol's work has stood the test of time and has been shown to be relevant and appropriate to contemporary management. Many of today's management texts including Daft (2005) have reduced the five functions to four: (1) planning, (2) organizing, (3) leading, and (4) controlling. Daft's text is organized around Fayol's four functions.   Fayol believed management theories could be developed, then taught. His theories were published in a monograph titled General and Industrial Management (1916). This is an extraordinary little book that offers the first theory of general management and statement of management principles.   Fayol suggested that it is important to have unity of command: a concept that suggests there should be only one supervisor for each person in an organization. Like Socrates, Fayol suggested that management is a universal human activity that applies equally well to the family as it does to the corporation.   Fayol has been described as the father of modern operational......

Words: 5553 - Pages: 23

Premium Essay

Beximco Group Mis Application of Henri Fayol's 14 Principles of Management

...BRAC University Summer'2013 BEXIMCO Group MIS Application Of Henri Fayol's 14 Principles of Management BEXIMCO Group MIS- Application of Henri Fayol's 14 Principles of Management Submitted to: Afsana Akhtar Assistant Professor BRAC Business School BRAC University Date of Submission: 13th August, 2013 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 13th August, 2013 To, Afsana Akhtar Assistant Professor BRAC Business School BRAC University. Sub: Submission of term paper for completion of course. Dear Madam, With high reverence we want to state that we have finished our term paper on the application of Henri Fayol's 14 Principles of Management in Beximco Group MIS in Bangladesh. While working with the term paper we got the first hand experience to learn about the applied management techniques in an organization. It helped us in gaining a new point of view on the significance of management theory like Henri Fayol's 14 Principles plays a role in effective and efficient performance of organizations such as Beximco Group MIS. We did some elaborate research and interviews and came up with sufficient resources to compile our term paper in a comprehensive manner. This term paper is valuable and a necessity to complete our course MGT211. In this term paper, all the team members contributed equally with sheer hard work. We faced some challenges in working as a team but due to everyone's collective efforts we overcame them and tried to produce this paper for......

Words: 12245 - Pages: 49

Premium Essay

Henry Foyal’s Contribution to the Management

...HI 6005: Management and Organisations in a Global Environment Henry Foyal’s contribution to the management Presented by Archan Dhakal | FIR2632 | Surya Pokrel | POK2032 | Pariyar Binaya | TIA2125 | Fahad Iqbal | BCM2092 | Purvika Fofindiwala | PCC2292 | Executive Summary Henri Fayol, the father of the school of Systematic Management, was motivated to create a theoretical foundation for a managerial educational program based on his experience as a successful managing director of a mining company. In his day, managers had no formal training and he observed that the increasing complexity of organizations would require more professional management. Fayol's legacy is his generic Principles of Management. Of Fayol's six generic activities for industrial undertakings (technical, commercial, financial, security, accounting, managerial), the most important were The Five Functions of Management that focused on the key relationships between personnel and its management. Planning was referred as drawing up plans of actions that combine unity, continuity, flexibility and precision given the organization’s resources, type and significance of work and future trends. Creating a plan of action is the most difficult of the five tasks and requires the active participation of the entire organization. Planning must be coordinated on different levels and with different time horizons where as organizing was providing capital, personnel and raw materials for the day-to-day......

Words: 4818 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Management

...elements of management according to Henri Fayol. Less known, but no less important, are Fayol's principles of management. Fayol was born in 1841 and died in 1925. His Administration Industrielle et Generale was published in French in 1916 but was not translated into English until   1929. Fayol's work is often quickly rejected either because of its age or because it is believed to have been superseded by observational findings. However, Fayol's work was based on observation. This paper considers some contemporary models of management (Hales, Kotter, Mintzberg) and argues that Fayol's elements of management are not refuted but are rather reinforced by more recent findings. The paper concludes that Fayol's work stands the test of time. The five elements of management and 14 principles of management are briefly presented. Michael J. Fells Fayol stands the test of time 345 Introduction Henri Fayol was born in 1841 and died in 1925. After 30 years of an eminently successful career as a practitioner, Fayol devoted the remainder of his life, from 1918 to 1925, to promoting his theory of administration (Fayol, 1949). Fayol was perhaps the first to note the need for management education (Brodie, 1967). His Administration Industrielle et Generale was published in   French in 1916. No English translation appeared until 1929. In the Foreword to the English translation of 1949 (Fayol, 1949) it is noted that the use of the term ``administration'' in the title of the original......

Words: 5489 - Pages: 22

Premium Essay

Director

...Summary vs Executive Summary Summary and Executive summary are two terms that are used quite often in education and business areas differently. A summary is a short or a brief account, sometimes elaborate too of the various events of a play. An executive summary on the other hand is a term used in business for a short document that summarizes a longer report, especially a business report. An executive summary is normally a condensed version of the full business document. Hence it needs skill on the part of the writer to execute an executive summary. On the other hand a summary should give salient features of any given aspect of a novel, or a short story or a play. This is the difference between a summary and an executive summary. You can write a summary of any particular episode of a novel or any other fiction written by Jane Austen. The particular summary should contain the various events of the episode in a nutshell or briefly. On the other hand an executive summary should be written in non-technical language. This is the main difference between the two. An executive summary should necessarily have a conclusion. On the other hand a conclusion is not necessary while writing a summary of a play or any scene of a play. An executive summary should ultimately make a business recommendation. No such intention is included in the writing of a summary. An executive summary should contain short and concise paragraphs. On the other hand a summary need not have short and concise......

Words: 4170 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Abcd

...partners in research and creativity to achieve stable, long-term growth and mutual benefits and be open to new partnerships. These principles, will guide the company in its global vision 2010. This global vision envisages continuous innovations in future, use of environment friendly technologies, respecting and working with different sections of society and establishing an interactive relationship with society. Based on www.toyota.co.jp/en/enviornmental_rep/03 /rinen.html on 17.10.2006 CHAPTER L E A R N I N G OBJECTIVES 2 After studying this chapter, you should be able to: n State the meaning, nature and significance of principles of management; Explain Taylor’s principles and techniques of Scientific Management; and Explain Fayol’s principles of management. n n It is clear from the foregoing case that managerial pursuits at Toyota Motor Corporation are driven by principles that serve as broad guidelines...

Words: 13855 - Pages: 56

Premium Essay

Classical School of Management

...NAME: ADEBIYI OLUWATOSIN MARY MATRIC NO: 100203010 DEPARTMENT: BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION LEVEL: 400 COURSE TITLE: MANAGEMENT THEORY COURSE CODE: BUS 413 ASSIGNMENT: Write about the Classical school of thought in Management in 2 pages. DATE: 26th of March 2014. CLASSICAL SCHOOL OF THOUGHT IN MANAGEMENT The classical school is the oldest formal school of management thought. Its roots predate the twentieth century. The classical school of thought generally concerns ways to manage work and organisations efficiently. Three areas of study that can be grouped under the classical school are scientific management, administrative management and bureaucratic management. The classical school (of management) has sought to define the essence of management in the form of universal fundamental functions. These, it was hoped, would form the cognitive basis for a set of relevant skills to be acquired, by all would-be managers through formal education. The classical school’s management thought was based on the belief that employees have only economical and physical needs, and that social needs and need for job satisfaction either don’t exist or are unimportant. Accordingly, this school advocates high specialization of......

Words: 975 - Pages: 4