Free Essay

The Greatest Good for the Greatest Number

In: Business and Management

Submitted By japarra77
Words 1173
Pages 5
The In Dr. Michael Sandel’s video, “The Greatest Good for the Greatest Number”, the issue of utilitarianism in regards to policy making is discussed. In particular, the philosophies of Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are called into question and applied to modern day scenarios that illustrate how difficult it can be to create a policy based on utilitarianism alone. Several issues arise throughout the course of the discussion that create doubt as to its effectiveness as well as convincing evidence in support. In the opening segment, Dr. Sandel speaks about Jeremy Bentham’s idea of utilitarianism. Benthem believed that a society must maximize happiness (utility) in order to provide the greatest amount of good for the greatest amount of people. He argues that a community is the sum of all its parts and so in deciding on a policy or law for that particular community, all the benefits of a decision must be compared with all the negative impacts of the decision and whatever maximizes the balance of pleasure over displeasure is the correct decision to make. In order to put this in a more modern perspective, Dr. Sandel introduces two cost-benefit analysis’ created by two major American companies that were used in making important business decisions. They did this by placing a dollar value on utility. The first analysis was done by Phillip Morris, a cigarette manufacturer, on a decision of whether or not the Czech Republic should increase the tax on smoking. In the study, Phillip Morris weighed the increased costs of healthcare for smokers against the benefits of them continuing to smoke. Some of these benefits were to be expected, such as increased tax revenue, but others were not. These included healthcare and pension savings as a result of the smokers dying. What they actually found is that the government of The Czech Republic actually stood to gain $147 million by not imposing the tax. This, however, brought up the moral issue in regards to the value of life being left out of the study. The second study involved Ford Motor Company and safety issues involving the Ford Pinto. Having been taken to court as the result of explosions that occurred when the vehicle was rear ended, it became apparent that Ford was aware of the problem and had actually done a cost-benefit analysis on whether to install a shield to protect the gas tank or not. Ford’s study differed from Phillip Morris’s in that it actually assigned a value to human life, which according to Ford Motor Company was $200,000. In their study, they actually found that it was less beneficial for them to install an $11 part than to just ignore the problem. It may seem at first that Ford’s analysis was more comprehensive than Phillip Morris’s, but it actually created another issue. That issue is: How do you assign a dollar value to human life? One student in the audience by the name of Julie, says that it is wrong to even attempt to assign a value, while another argues that a number needs to be assigned and a cost-benefit analysis must be done and if it is not, then the greater good is sacrificed in the process. At this point in the discussion, Dr. Sandel asks the audience who is or isn’t in favor of utilitarianism. Seeing that the majority are in favor, he calls upon Anna, who is not, to ask her reasoning. Anna claims that it is unfair to the minority and asks why their wants or desires are any less important than the majority. This leads to two common objections to utilitarianism. The first is that it fails to respect individual or minority rights. As an example, Dr. Sandel uses Ancient Rome. Were the lives of a few Christians worth the collective pleasure of all the Romans that were entertained by them being fed to lions? The second objection is whether or not it is even possible to assign a dollar value to utility. To highlight this point, Dr. Sandel refers to a study done by a psychologist in the 1930’s, who asked his subjects how much they would have to be paid to endure certain instances of pain or suffering. The results were surprising, with living on a farm in Kansas requiring significantly more money than something quite painful as having a tooth pulled or small toe cut off. This illustrates the difficulty in assigning value to utility as it may vary from person to person or society to society. To add to the difficulty in assigning value to utility, Dr. Sandel asks if there should be a distinction between higher and lower pleasures. Should some people’s preferences be valued more than others? And if so, who is to say whose preferences are of higher value? Dr. Sandel refers to John Stuart Mill, who attempted to address these objections by trying to humanize utilitarianism. He did this by trying to enlarge the view of utilitarianism to include humanitarian concerns such as individual rights and whether or not there was a distinction between higher and lower pleasures. He later argued that it was, in fact, possible to distinguish higher and lower pleasures. According to J.S. Mill this could only be achieved by experiencing both and at that point deciding which one gave you more pleasure. When asked, the majority of the audience agrees that this approach does not succeed in differentiating the two. Dr. Sandel then performs an experiment, showing three videos clips to the audience. When the audience is asked which video they enjoyed most, they overwhelmingly chose a clip of The Simpsons over a clip of a Hamlet soliloquy. However, when asked which was the “higher experience” they chose Hamlet. So although at first they did not agree with J.S. Mill’s theory, Dr. Sandel’s experiment confirmed it. In terms of the El Paso/ Juarez business environment, it is rather hard to apply. The reason for this is the striking difference between economic situations. Although the two cities are close geographically, the nature of business could not be more different. In El Paso there are laws and regulations that require and ensure fair business practices for the most part. On the other hand, in Juarez there is a completely different business environment where the balance between rich and poor is extremely unequal. In regards to higher and lower pleasures, there is a severe dichotomy between the classes. This is easily illustrated with El Paso recently being named one of the safest places to live and Juarez having the distinction as one of the most dangerous and violent cities in the world. With that being said, El Paso has had more than its fair share of public corruption as evidenced in recent local headlines. The fact that these people are held responsible for their actions is proof that the community is not willing to allow a few people to prosper at the expense of the greater good.

Jason Parra
Global Business Environment
CRN: 21728
3/25/12

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Explain How Bentham’s Version of Utilitarianism May Be Used to Decide on the Right Course of Action. (25 Marks)

...it produces pleasure and it’s morally wrong if it produce pain. The principle of Utility refers to the greatest amount of pleasure or happiness for the greatest number of people. According to Bentham, most moral acts are those that maximise pleasure and minimise pain. An action is correct according to Bentham if it gives higher quantity of happiness. Jeremy Bentham’s principle of utility states that ‘greatest happiness for the greatest number.’ Bentham stated that human being is governed by two sovereign masters: pain and pleasure. By pleasure he means the benefits, advantage, goodness and happiness. By pain Bentham refers to evil and unhappiness. An example of this will be childbirth. During the period of pregnancy and throughout the labour the mother goes through different level of pain. However, the result is pleasure as baby is born. This not only brings happiness to the mother, also to a greater amount of people especially the family members. The greatest happiness is given to greatest number. Bentham said: ‘Nature has placed us under the governance of two sovereign master, pain and pleasure. An act is right if it delivers more pleasure than pain and wrong if it brings about more pain than pleasure.’ This approach of Bentham can be used to decide on the right course of action as it considers an action is right if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number. This approach can be used to explain death of Jesus the only Son of God. For God so loved the world that...

Words: 833 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Ethics

...or Consequences Making Ethical Judgments in Utilitarianism ! ! ! Utilitarianism says that the Result or the Consequence of an Act is the real measure of whether it is good or bad. This theory emphasizes Ends over Means. Theories, like this one, that emphasize the results or consequences are called teleological or consequentialist. Bentham’s Formulation of Utilitarianism ! ! ! Jeremy Bentham Man is under two great masters, pain and pleasure. The great good that we should seek is happiness. (a hedonistic perspective) Those actions whose results increase happiness or diminish pain are good. They have “utility.” 1 Jeremy Bentham’s Hedonistic Calculus ! Four Theses of Utilitarianism ! ! ! In determining the quantity of happiness that might be produced by an action, we evaluate the possible consequences by p q y applying several values: Intensity, duration, certainty or uncertainty, propinquity or remoteness, fecundity, purity, and extent. ! ! Consequentialism: The rightness of actions is determined solely by their consequences. Hedonism: Utility is the degree to which an act produces pleasure. Hedonism is the thesis that pleasure or happiness is the good that we seek and that we should seek. d h h ld k Maximalism: A right action produces the greatest good consequences and the least bad. Universalism: The...

Words: 1546 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Describe the Main Principles of the Two Normative Ethical Theories of Deontology and Utilitarianism. Compare and Contrast the Two Theories, Bringing Out Any Problems or Limitations You See in Each.

... There are two major ethics theories that attempt to specify and justify moral rules and principles; these are utilitarianism and deontological ethics. Utilitarianism (also known as consequentialism) is a moral theory developed and refined in the modern world in the writings of Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873).(1) Deontology is a ??? theory developed from the eighteenth century philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). The theory utilitarianism is the morality of an act that is judged by it’s utility. The greatest utility that is has for the most people; the greatest usefulness an act has for the most people. Utilitarianism states morality is not based in the act itself but in the consequences of the act. The utilitarian approach to morality implies that no moral act or rule is intrinsically right or wrong; it is the rightness or wrongness of an act or rule that is solely a matter of the overall nonmoral good (pleasure, happiness, health, knowledge, or...

Words: 1646 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Utilatarianism

...UTILATARIANISM IN ETHICS Utilatarianism is an ethical philosophy in which the happiness of the greatest number of people in the society is considered the greatest good. According to this philosophy, an action is morally right if its consequences lead to happiness (absence of pain), and wrong if it ends in unhappiness (pain). Since the link between actions and their happy or unhappy outcomes depends on the circumstances, no moral principle is absolute or necessary in itself under utilitarianism. Utilatarianism Proposed by the English philosopher-reformer Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) in his 1789 book Principles Of Morals And Legislation it was developed by the English philosopher-economist John Stuart Mill (1806-73) in his 1863 book Utilitarianism. Bentham’s Formulation of Utilitarianism are firstly, man is under two great masters which is pain and pleasure. Secondly, the great good that we should seek is happiness (a hedonistic perspective). Those actions whose results increase happiness or diminish pain are good. So that, they have “utility.” There are four theses of Utilitarianism which are the rightness of actions is determined solely by their consequences (Consequentialism), utility is the degree to which an act produces pleasure. Hedonism is the thesis that pleasure or happiness is the good that we seek and that we should seek (Hedonism), a right action produces the greatest good consequences and the least bad (Maximalism) and the consequences to be considered are those of...

Words: 507 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Wabash Watershed

...during his time. His most influential contributions in relation to ethics was about Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is a moral theory with a basic principle of utility (Well-being or happiness: that is conductive to the happiness and well-being of the greatest number) or the greatest happiness principle that should be accomplished from ones actions. For example, we ought to do that which produces the greatest amount of happiness or pleasure for the greatest number of people. (Mackinnon, 2013, p.33) Another principle of utilitarianism is the consequentialist principle, meaning that someone’s personal action would result in a consequence. In this theory the nature of act or motives are not considered in the end result. Pain is also acceptable as long as it results in the greatest amount of pleasure and happiness for the greater good. How is the greatest good for all determined? The theory of utilitarianism uses five elements to calculate whether a person’s action will produce the greatest good. The five elements include the amount of pleasure or happiness, its intensity, the duration, its fruitfulness, and the likelihood of an act to produce it. (Mackinnon, 2013, p.36) In order to determine what is best for the greatest good utilitarianism uses the mathematical approach to determine this. In calculating the measurements for example, pain or pleasure may be calculated as bits or units. For example, you have twelve units of happiness and six units of unhappiness and subtract...

Words: 399 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Key Features of Utilitarianism

...The philosophy was proposed by the Englishman Jeremy Bentham(1748 - 1832), who was a consequentalist and believed that an act was good as long as it brought out a positive outcome, and that all acts done on the way would be justified if it ended with a postivie result. The theory`s historical context was that it strived to be a relovutionary social and political reform movement, propagated in the 18th and 19th century in the Enlightenment era. This era was identified by dynamic and permissive ideas about the human natures and societys impeccability. The theory is also made with a secular view, which means that it is not based on any religion and therefore can be used by anyone, both religious and non-religious. The fact that it focuses on the consequences of actions makes it teleological, which is a theory of morality that defines all actions as right if it brings out maximum pleasure. There is no fixed rules other than that the outcome has to be pleasure for the majority, which also makes Utilitarianism relativist. The principle of Utility is “the greatest good for the greatest number” which is a phrase coined by Francis Hutcheson. It shows the simple rule of Utilitariansism which is that the majority of people should be getting pleasure. Later, Jeremy Bentham used this and made his own version saying “The greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation,”. Utilitariansism is also hedonistic, which is show in Bentham`s quote “The principle...

Words: 834 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Ethics Essay

...text, Basic ethics: Basic ethics in action is defined as the science of the right and wrong in human actions. The study of human actions has intrigued many scientists over the ages hence the different disciplines of ethics (i.e. deontological, utilitarian, and virtue ethics). The text provides the following definitions: Deontology is a theory that emphasizes one’s duty to do a particular action simply because the action itself is inherently right and not because of any calculations of consequences. Deontology operates on the principle of right, regardless of harm or if to do less than right would be of greater benefit. Utilitarianism is a theory that focuses on the team or community and takes the view point that the greatest good for the greatest number. Essentially, utilitarianism suggests that an action is morally right when the benefit to the group or community outweighs that of all other options Virtue theory, also called agent-based or character ethics, is most closely aligned with the concept of...

Words: 664 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Great Utilitarianism Effect

...it may help them act morally in a given situation, conform to the laws and do the right thing as presented. It is in relation of the moral decision making that the story of this car manufacturer recalls that people have to use their ethical values in measure to act as right as possible toward one to another in given circumstances. Utilitarianism in general could be defined as a moral principle that holds that the righteous or wrongness of an action could be determined by its usefulness of bringing the most happiness to the greatest number of people affected by the act. Also, the theory of utilitarianism values that the morality of an action is the one that maximizes utility. Many people use the moral principles of the utilitarian to respond in a given situation and do as right as possible. However, some people do not always use their morals values in some situations and tend to use to react on their self-interest or well-being. The story of the number one car manufacturer presents that in the society where we all live, people should use their morals values to make the right decisions and do the right thing for the safety of all. In reference to the theory of utilitarianism the car manufacturer has to make a choice on either leave the release of the Hipster with the major brake defeat that can cause deadly accidents or recalls the release and look further into the incidents. Therefore using...

Words: 1935 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Utilitarianism

...it produces pleasure and it’s morally wrong if it produce pain. The principle of Utility refers to the greatest amount of pleasure or happiness for the greatest number of people. According to Bentham, most moral acts are those that maximise pleasure and minimise pain. An action is correct according to Bentham if it gives higher quantity of happiness. Jeremy Bentham’s principle of utility states that ‘greatest happiness for the greatest number.’ Bentham stated that human being is governed by two sovereign masters: pain and pleasure. By pleasure he means the benefits, advantage, goodness and happiness. By pain Bentham refers to evil and unhappiness. An example of this will be childbirth. During the period of pregnancy and throughout the labour the mother goes through different level of pain. However, the result is pleasure as baby is born. This not only brings happiness to the mother, also to a greater amount of people especially the family members. The greatest happiness is given to greatest number. Bentham said: ‘Nature has placed us under the governance of two sovereign master, pain and pleasure. An act is right if it delivers more pleasure than pain and wrong if it brings about more pain than pleasure.’ This approach of Bentham can be used to decide on the right course of action as it considers an action is right if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number. This approach can be used to explain death of Jesus the only Son of God. For God so loved the world that...

Words: 322 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Explain Both the General Principles of Utilitarianism and the Distinctive Features of Rule Utilitarianism. (30 Marks)

...understanding of what will result from our choices. When we make choices which result in the correct consequences, then we are acting morally; when we make choices which result in the incorrect consequences, then we are acting immorally. A deontological approach is the opposite to this because it focuses on the act itself. Utilitarianism is an example of a teleological theory because an action's morality is based on whether its consequence brings the Greatest Happiness. This Greatest Happiness Principle or the Principle of Utility, or the ‘The greatest happiness for the greatest number’ is the main principle of a number of ethical theories that fall under the umbrella of ‘Utilitarianism’. It was Jeremy Bentham who first developed these general principles into fully articulated theory. It was he who introduced the principle of utility to refer only to individual actions by individuals, its simple mesHe defined ‘Good’ in terms of pleasure or happiness — so an act is right or wrong according to the good or bad that results from the act and the good act is the most pleasurable. Therefore, if an abortion brought more happiness than sadness, under Bentham’s thinking it would be the right thing to dosage being that the more...

Words: 943 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Utilitarianism

...states that the point of the Utilitarian theory is to conceptualize exactly what is good life by “bringing about consequences of a certain sort that is the greatest happiness for the greatest number” (The Story of Ethics). The Story of Ethics also states that the Utilitarian principle of greatest happiness for the greatest number was first popularized by Jeremy Bentham who according to the Lecture Note “version of utilitarianism is known as quantitative utilitarianism” (Lecture Note). According to The Story of Ethics Bentham states that the principle of utility recognizes right and wrong and the causes and effects from right and wrong. These effects can lead to the nature of mankind being either in pain or pleasure and “Bentham assumes that one can only act according to their aversion to pain or desire for pleasure” (The Story of Ethics). The understanding that I have gained from Bentham’s theory is that good and bad is judged by pleasure and pain that is the greater the pleasure the greater the good and the greater the pain the greater the bad. Bentham’s theory is the ethical position that influenced both John Stuart Mill and his father James Mill. According to an article in the Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia “the central aim of John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism is to defend the view that those acts that produce the greatest happiness of the greatest number of people are right and good” (Salem Press). The Story of Ethics states that Mill’s believed that Christian...

Words: 992 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Ethics

...Utilitarianism: * Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes utility, usually defined as maximizing happiness and reducing suffering. * The Utilitarian tradition is often summarised as “the greatest good for the greatest number” * “The Classical Utilitarians, Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, identified the good with pleasure”. Therefore pleasure is the ultimate goal that will lead to an ethical society, according to the Utilitarian approach. John Stuart Mill: * was an English philosopher, political economist and civil servant. * He has been called "the most influential English-speaking philosopher of the nineteenth century Theory of liberty: * Mill states that it is acceptable for someone to harm himself as long as he is not harming others. * On Liberty involves an impassioned defense of free speech * The individual ought to be free to do as he wishes unless he harms others. * Individuals are rational enough to make decisions about their good being and choose any religion they want to. * Government should interfere when it is for the protection of society. * Freedom of speech Harm principle: * The harm principle holds that the actions of individuals should only be limited to prevent harm to other individuals. * John Stuart Mill articulated this principle in On Liberty, where he argued that, "The only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised...

Words: 512 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Bentham's Utilitarianism Principles

...actions are right in proportion to the degree of happiness they produce and wrong in proportion to degree of pain they produce. The principle of utility defines ‘good’ as happiness or pleasure and the goal of a moral action is the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Utilitarianism is a teleological theory meaning that final causes exist in nature. So the rightness of an action is determined by its consequences and not by the motive. So if the consequences are good then the motivation, even if it is negative is not even considered. The principle of utilitarianism is usually expressed as ‘the greatest happiness for the greatest number.’ The form developed by Bentham is commonly applied to each individual situation. Bentham’s form is better know as Act Utilitarianism. He believed that pleasure and pain identified what we should and shouldn’t do. He also claimed that the quantity of pleasure/happiness for the greatest number of people, therefore he devised the ‘Hedonic Calculus’ this considered seven principles, each of which could be given a numerical score. The key to utilitarianism is to consider the consequences of a particular action rather than just saying that an action is intrinsically wrong in and of itself. Actions are morally neutral only their consequences have any moral value – they are not intrinsically good or bad. Bentham argued that these consequences could be calculated by the hedonic calculus. The Hedonic Calculus consisted of seven principles, each of which...

Words: 598 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Explain How Bentham’s Version of Utilitarianism May Be Used to Decide on the Right Course of Action

...the right and good thing to do. This calculation can be done through the hedonic calculus, formed of 7 parts. The first is the intensity of the pleasure coming from the act, or the depth of pleasure. The second is the duration of the pleasure, how long it lasts – the pleasure of having a baby and so child would last longer than the pleasure of keeping the job or promotion you may loose, therefore assisting with decisions like abortion. The third is the certainty of pleasure, or uncertainty. Forth is the remoteness of the pleasure, will it directly effect you or effect people far away all over the world – like giving to charity. Then comes the chance of a succession of pleasures, this looks at the consequences of the act, questioning weather this act will continue to have good outcomes or if good could lead to bad. The sixth is the purity of pleasure, how secure the pleasure will be. The final element if the extent of the pleasure, how many people will it effect in a positive or negative way – this element reminds us of the greatest good for the greatest number of people, not just for you as an individual. This calculus gave Bentham a solid way of measuring and quantifying weather an action is morally right or wrong, it allowed him to judge weather the act would result in the most pleasurable outcome having weighed up all of the elements. Therefore, any act can be judged by any person in a simple quantitative way. Bentham’s principle of utility states that ‘greatest happiness for...

Words: 757 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Business

...Responsibility Notes: Philosophical and Other Accounts of Ethical Behavior: 09/02/14 Ethics is everyone has his or her own point of view My values are my own If someone’s ethical view affects others -Child labor View as subjects not objects Ethical views can conflict What happens if two people disagree about ethics? One of the points of ethics is asked how to live Utlitatism- actions and good. The greatest number Democracy gives people a say Greatest good greatest number Why should the majority rule? But what if the majority is unethical? -Slavery Principle ethics Principle Duty Deontological Decide between right and wrong Consequence Put things into perspective -Slaves perspective -Childs perspective put yourself in position in place of whole society making a claim about individuals Individuals have certain rights -trumps utilizationism Majority and Minority What makes something a right? Personal connection to people Trolley D / 1 person ------------------ \ 5 people 09/04/14 utilistarism theory vs. Greatest good for greatest number of people Businesses being efficient maximizes their profit The world is based on utilistarism Consent is required but do you really know what you are consenting too Nonconsensual Or with consent how would you pick people who don’t want to test Churchhill bombing not wanting to give away the code If we are willing to sacrifice the lives of 500 people to not give away the code Will...

Words: 365 - Pages: 2