Free Essay

The Ideology of the Tea Party Movement

In: Other Topics

Submitted By astuinei1
Words 2369
Pages 10
The Ideology of the Tea Party Movement
Tuinei, Alex
Salt Lake Community College

Abstract
In the last few decades there has been no political movement comparable to the Tea Parties. The Tea Party Movement is unique because it is entirely grassroots and desires to change American politics from the bottom-up. The mainstream media and the Democratic leadership as well as some establishment Republicans all misunderstand and grossly underestimate the movement. They have labeled it a movement of extreme right-wing nuts that are angry at having a black President, or don't want to pay taxes, or cling to guns and religion (Avalon, 2010). They are wrong. In fact, the Tea Party Movement is a mainstream awakening that has been long overdue and will not wither and die within a couple years as some predict. The Tea Party groups are a loose and decentralized coalition of libertarians, conservatives, disenchanted independents and moderate democrats. Tea Partiers are not a concentrated group of ideologues but a diverse collection of regular groups that are alarmed at the direction of the country. Stimulus Package was the start of it all and was further amplified by hidden taxes built into cap'n'trade and healthcare reform. (Murphy, 2008) American history remembers and teaches about that memorable night on December 16, 1773 the British Parliament passed The Tea Act. This turns out to be the final straw in a series of unpopular policies and taxes that where imposed by Britain on her American colonies. This policy was a slap in the face to the colonies and ignited a “powder keg” of opposition and resentment among American colonists and was the catalyst of the Boston Tea Party. In many ways this is like history repeating itself. That brave group of people stood up for what was best for the majority of the colonies and it was a way for them to be heard. This reflects many similarities of the present moment but without violence and destruction of property. Tea Partiers are also upset at the corruption and utter lack of transparency in the Obama administration and the Democratic Congress.

The Ideology of the Tea Party Movement
The main issues for Tea Partiers that are not fairly reported on by the media as well as those both on the left and some on the right are excessive government spending, the economy and the over expansion of government power over the past six years. There are Ten Core Belief of the Tea Partiers share (1) eliminate excessive taxes, (2) eliminate the National Debt; (3) eliminate deficit spending; (4) protect free markets; (5) abide by the Constitution of the United States; (6) promote civic responsibility; (7) reduce the overall size of government; (8) believe in the people; (9) avoid the pitfalls of politics; and (10) maintain local independence (Tea Party Platform, 2011). The Tea Partiers are very adamant about limiting the power of the federal government or any government and are very alarmed at the dramatic increase in government power particularly the federal. Tea Partiers as well as many tax paying citizens are also outraged at the massive budget deficits, the growth of the national debt, and the generational theft taking place. The Movement advocates economic freedom and strongly believes that the present President, “Mr. Obama and the Democratic Congress are dismantling the free market economy in favor of a more centralized, socialist economy” (Oliver, 2009). Another important element of the movement is their attitude toward partisan politics. Tea Partiers have consistently expressed their frustration and discontent with the Republicans as well as Democrats. In general, Tea Partiers are anti-establishment and want wholesale changes in their representatives. They are highly suspicious of career politicians and the influence of the national party leadership in local elections. As a result, they have rejected the traditional or establishment candidates in a number of primaries, preferring more independent or activist candidates. Tea Partiers want change through elections not gunfire. Like any other movement, there are individuals that are unhinged and violent, but the media's focus on this extremely small sect demonstrates their lack of integrity and liberal bias. In reality, the Tea Party Movement is one of the most peaceful large scale political protests in recent memory. The objective of the Tea Party Movement is to change the Republican Party from within (Fox, 2010). The 18 percent of Americans who identify themselves as Tea Party supporters tend to be Republican, white, male, married and older than 45, according to a New York Times/CBS News poll released in April 2010. They are wealthier and better-educated than the general public. Tea Partiers hold more conservative views on a range of issues than Republicans generally. They are also more likely to describe themselves as "very conservative" and President Obama as "very liberal." However, while most Republicans say they are "dissatisfied" with Washington, Tea Party supporters are more likely to classify themselves as "angry” (Zernike, 2010). Although Tea Party organizers have insisted they created a nonpartisan grass-roots movement, others have argued that tea parties were largely created by the uproar of cable news and fuelled by the financial and political support of current and former Republican leaders. Within the American political establishment, the enormous growth of the Tea Party movement has invoked a series of reactions and emotions. It was first ignored, even as thousands of Tea Party rallies drew large, passionate crowds across the nation. When its size and influence ultimately became too large to neglect, it was wrongly and inaccurately slandered. Then, when the slandering also largely failed, they questioned whether the movement actually had the political skill and influence to tangibly impact major elections (Blumer, 2011). While the Tea Party movement is a decidedly non-partisan one, it has served the very constructive ends of enhancing debate and political competition within the Republican Party (Johns, 2010). Faced with Tea Party opponents, many established Republican incumbents and challengers have been forced to address policy issues with greater specificity, and the result has been a healthier political climate in which primary voters have been afforded broader choices. The Tea Party movement has so far accomplished things that are both extraordinary and necessary. The movement has invigorated a grassroots, boots-on-the-ground army of passionate conservative activists. This is something that the Republican Party, which has been the putative flag-bearer of conservatism, has been utterly incapable of inspiring. The Republican Party has not yet even fully adjusted to the limited-government tsunami that has cascaded out of the Tea Party movement because of its misdirected political inaction. Emotionally, the Tea Party movement has infused conservatives with energy that seemed unimaginable just couple of months ago. It has reintroduced the concept of limited government into mainstream American political conversation. The Tea Party Movement is a positive development in American Politics. A rather unique entity, there seems to still be much confusion as what the exact classification of the Tea Party movement really is. Many ask are they an interest group, political party or a social movement? The ideology of the Tea Party can be looked at in these three ways, and which system would be the more effective system. That of course is a whole different story. In the text book, Power and Choice: An Introduction to Political Science states and defines a political party as “a group of officials or would be officials who are linked with a sizable group of citizens into an organization. A chief objective of this organization is to ensure that its officials attain power and are maintained in power” (Shively, 2012, p. 251). It is no secret that the Tea Party movement clearly has various officials around the country that they want to place into power. Without a clear and lack of some type centralized leadership and little to no attempt to try to separate from the Republican Party one would be hard-pressed to argue them as a political party. If the Tea Party Movement is successful in the 2014 Midterm elections, it will prove that career politicians can be held accountable and that it is the people that hold the power. It would also prove that a strong anti-establishment and anti-government movement can manifest itself peacefully through a massive grassroots effort and legitimate political activity, not intimidation or violence. It will also strike a blow to cynics who believe that the people cannot change Washington. The Tea Party proved its influence at the polls but at the same time lost Republican seats. The election of New York’s 23rd District, the Tea Partiers mobilized behind Conservative Party candidate Doug Hoffman, forcing Republican candidate Dierdre Scozzafava to drop from the election. This tactic backfired and the seat went to Democrat Bill Owens. Owens then became the first Democrat to represent the district since the 19th century. The Tea Party had much better luck in Massachusetts in January 2010. The U.S. Senate had a seat open due to the death of Ted Kennedy. Candidate Scott Brown defeated Massachusetts’ attorney general Martha Coakley. This victory for the “Tea Party shifted the balance in the Senate which depriving the Democrats of the 60-vote filibuster-proof majority they had held since July 2009 (Britannica).” In May 2010 the Tea Party proved its influence yet again. Rand Paul, son of former Libertarian presidential candidate Ron Paul, won the Republican primary for a Kentucky seat in the U.S. Senate. Paul had defeated Trey Grayson, Kentucky’s secretary of state and Kentuckian Mitch McConnell. The Tea Party is in many ways a typical popular constitutionalist movement. As such, it exemplifies some of the standard strengths and weaknesses of such movements Moreover, the Tea Party's unusual focus on limiting federal power could potentially create some important benefits. Despite its typical weakness which is popular with any type of constitutional movements, there is at least one important virtue the Tea Party strongly possesses. That is like many of its previous predecessors. It can be a potentially useful check that can be put on the power of political elites. The best examples would be those members of government who make and interpret the laws. It is true that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land but if its interpretation is left solely up to political elites in the courts, members of Congress, and the President and his staff representing the executive branch, the practical and obvious result would be elite dominance of a political system unconstrained by public opinion. Given the incentive of elites to use political power for their own benefit at the expense of the public, this would be a dangerous state of affairs. The ultimate impact of the Tea Party on American constitutionalism remains to be seen only in Congress. The movement could fade away, be endorsed by the Republican Party leadership, or it could drift off into a more “Big Government” intolerant direction. The Tea Party movement is no doubt in many ways similar to a typical popular advocate of constitutional government. As such, it exemplifies some of the standards that are typical, both strong and weak of such movements, including widespread political ignorance. Having said this, evidence also suggests that other voters including those who are liberal and the political left are no politically smarter than and just as dumb as the Tea Party supporters. Furthermore, the Tea Party's curious focus on limiting the power of the government, particularly the federal could have some great potential and create some important benefits. The impact that the Tea Party ultimately may have on constitutionalism in America after four years still remains to be seen. Could this just be a phase America is going through, no one really knows? The movement could easily fade away as quickly as it came to be, maybe co-opted by the Republican Party leadership, or just take off and veer in a more socially intolerant direction. For now, the evidence shows only that the Tea Party is very much in the same tradition as previous popular constitutionalist movements. And its focus on limiting federal power could have some major beneficial effects. For the moment evidence shows for now that the Tea Party like many other popular constitutionalist movements is very much in the same tradition. And will remain if not a party or a movement, but an idea in minds and hearts of millions of Americans.
“Don't interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties.”
― Abraham Lincoln

References

Avlon, J. (2010). Wingnuts: How the lunatic fringe is hijacking america. In J. Avlon, Wingnuts: How the lunatic fringe is hijacking america (p. 284). Philadelphia: Beast Books.

Blumer, T. (2011, August 10). Dumping on the Tea Party. Retrieved from PJ Media: http://pjmedia.com/blog/dumping-on-the-tea-party/

Britannica. (2011). "Tea Party Movement" (American Political movement). In I. Encyclopedia Britannica, Britannica online. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc.

Fox, J. W. (2010, August 02). Tea party movement has had a positive impact on american politics. Retrieved from Right side news: http://www.rightsidenews.com/2010080227162/us/politics/tea-party-movement-has-had-a-positive-impact-on-american-politics.html

Johns, M. (2010, October 20). The tea party movement has strengthened American democracy. Retrieved from Freedom and Prosperity: http://michaeljohnsonfreedomandprosperity.blogspot.com/2010/10/tea-party-movement-has-strengthened.html

Murphy, R. P. (2008, November 15). The high cost of 'Green Recovery'. Retrieved from Forbes.com: http://www.forbes.com/2008/11/15/energy-green-economics-oped-cx_rpm_1115murphy.html

Oliver, D. J. (2009, December 15). Socialism in stages. Retrieved from National review online: http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/228794/socialism-stages/dan-oliver-jr

Shively, W. P. (2012). Power & Choice: An introduction to political science, 13/e. In W. P. Shively, Power & Choice: An introduction to political science, 13/e (p. 251). New York: McGraw - Hill Ryerson.

Tea Party Platform. (2011). Tea party movement. Retrieved from Tea Party Platform - The platform of the tea party: http://www.teaparty-platform.com/Tea_Party_Movement_P9MG.html
Zernike, K. (2010, April 14). Poll Finds Tea Party Backers Wealthier and More Educated. Retrieved from The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/15/us/politics/15poll.html?_r=0

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Book Review

...thorough look at the rise of tea parties and the revitalized Right. The Author begins the book with the title, ‘End Times,’ in which he refers to the economic downfall of 2008 and 2009 and The Great Depression where the lives of the middle class came apart. Thomas explains this time as one in which, “markets disintegrate, layoffs mount and foreclosures begin, and before you know it, the people are in the streets yelling for blood.” He describes the recession as a direct result of banker’s greed and deregulation but it was the middle class who suffered. Big businesses such as Banks, and Insurance companies were the ones being bailed out as he explains in Chapter 2, ‘Crime Pays.’ Millions of people lost their jobs and houses but the Big Businesses could not be permitted to fail. For the suffering middle class it was now confirmed that the big businesses were in league with the big government. Financial firms such as Merill Lynch were reported approving extravagant bonuses despite knowing the company was headed for catastrophe. At this point the Republican Party was headed downhill but later rose as the revitalized Right. The New Right capitalized on public confusion through the use of Tea Party movements. Republicans were now depicting themselves enemies of the Big Businesses, deflecting public anger away from them. As Thomas Frank puts it, it was the, “the burden of villainy from Wall Street to government,” in this case to the nations left wing party. The reinvigorated Right...

Words: 1164 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Racial Polarization

...individuals who are highly conservative are more likely to hold negative perceptions of African-Americans and other minorities. Furthermore, racial antipathy affects the way individuals perceive Barack Obama. In light of recent trends, this study tested whether individuals who identify themselves as Republicans are substantially more likely to maintain negative racial attitudes. The study also investigated whether white Americans are more likely than other racial groups to harbor racial prejudices and disapprove of Barack Obama. Results from this study indicated that racial resentment plays a significant role in contemporary politics. Data from between-subjects ANOVA and correlational analysis suggested that the Democratic Party and Republican Party are polarized in regards to racial issues. Moreover, conservative whites are the most likely racial group to hold racial prejudices against African-Americans. Finally, disapproval of President Obama is highly associated with high levels of negative racial stereotypes. Keywords: race, antipathy, conservatism, prejudices, Obama Is Racial Antipathy Increasing? The Polarizing Effect of Obama’s Presidency In 2008, Barack Obama became the first African-American to become President of the United States. His election marked a pivotal turning point in American politics. To millions, Obama’s election signaled the start of a post-racial America. The country was infused with euphoria as citizens from diverse backgrounds celebrated...

Words: 6638 - Pages: 27

Free Essay

The Tea Party's Illegitimate Reactions to Perceived Failures of Society

...Vishnu Venkateswaran Writing 140: Section #64330 Rory Lukins November 15th, 2013 Assignment #4 The Tea Party’s Illegitimate Reactions to Perceived Failures of Society Signs that read “revolt against socialism”, arguments racing across the floors of Congress, and meddling in the electoral process to protest against the Democratic agenda are just a small number of the Tea Party’s activities. The Tea Party is a movement spurred on by CNBC’s Rick Santelli whose angry rant rouse the fervor of many a conservative. (Skocpol & Williamson, 1) In particular, he argued against the economic stimulus package introduced by the Obama administration in 2009. Shortly after, the official commencement of the Tea Party movement began with a rally of the fiscal conservative. It started out as a grassroots movement and later evolved into a widespread local and national organization. With generous funding from conservative billionaires and large political organization committees, the Tea Party grew exponentially from state to state. Tea Partiers called for a cut in taxes and public spending as well as deregulation of business operations to lower the national deficit. These individuals started their protest by conventional rallies with signs denouncing Obama’s policies. This later escalated, however, into endorsing candidates into the GOP and reforming the Republican Party. The Tea Party’s activities have contributed towards the recent government shutdown causing scorn amongst many in American...

Words: 3263 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

The Importance Of Polarization In America

...The debate in America is based on polarization between the two major political parties: Republican (red states) and Democratic (blue states) Parties. Due to the presidential election results, there’s a division between the states that led to battleground. The "colors" of these states will not change. "While much "red and blue" ink has been spilled over whether elite polarization is mirrored by the public, existing research provides no consensus when it comes to answering this question. On the one hand, some scholars argue that if citizens take cues from party elites—as recent research suggests they do—then they should come to resemble party elites by becoming more ideologically oriented partisans" (Abramowitz & Saunders, 2008; Carsey & Layman, 2006; Hetherington, 2001). James Wilson, a political science...

Words: 999 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Naxalsim: Boon or Bane for Oppressed

...In Favour: Naxalites, also known as Naxals, are a group of people waging violent struggle on behalf of the oppressed tribes and landless labourers against the landlords and others exploiting them. The inception, ideology, spread and sustenance of Naxalism are deeply rooted in socio-economic conditions. The ideology of Naxalite is to fight oppression and exploitation to create a classless society. The Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) is the political guise that promulgates the Naxalite ideology. The manifestation of the above ideology is seen in the very first Naxalbari uprising that took place in 1967 in Naxalbari village of Darjeeling district. The local goons there attacked a tribal who had been given land, under the tenancy laws, by the court. In retaliation, the tribals attacked landlords and claimed the land. The West Bengal State Secretariat of the CPI (M) stated, “Behind the peasant unrest in Naxalbari lies a deep social malafide transfers, evictions and other anti-people actions of tea gardeners and jotedars.” India is a free country but its people are yet to acquire freedom from hunger and deprivation and that the rich class of Zamindars, traders, industrialists, etc. control the means of production. Very often, the Adivasis, the Dalits and the underprivileged poor, who work as landless labourers for penny are exploited by the filthy rich landlords and are paid frequently below the mandated minimum wage rate. These people are often left untouched by India’s...

Words: 1069 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Where Is Texas America

...can be proud of your country. It is to work towards an ideal vision you have set for your country so that you can be prideful about your country. That is why Republicans and Democrats both are capable of being very prideful about their direction they are taking the country even though their visions, of how America should be, are very different. A lot of people have concerns about the direction the country is being led towards, and this has spawned numerous ideologies such as the occupy movement, the tea party, and others. Some people in these groups are radicalized and ashamed of America and some don’t even want to be American due to injustices they believe exist in America. Such as this article from 2012 after the reelection of President Obama from Time Magazine, that states after the reelection 100,000 people signed a petition on the White House website asking for peaceful secession from the United States. Why are these people...

Words: 554 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Civil Rights Movement Analysis

...Rights and Protest – Different Perspectives Both leaders were crucial to the movements in both South Africa and the United States of America. To begin, both leaders saw the oppression of their government towards it African American community and took different paths and used different methods to fight against the system. Both leaders used their platforms to shine light on the injustice in their communities and why their protests were disobeying the laws and why the protestors had justice and God on their side. That is why in the Birmingham letter, Martin Luther King Jr. was upset with the clergy man for not understanding the context of the situation. Both MLK and Nelson Mandela are criticized for their methods, for instance MLK is criticized by the clergy men. He goes on to...

Words: 707 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Us Government Notes from the Lecture

...States Government Political parties & interests groups Political Parties * American political parties do not have clear programs, regular members, annual meetings, party leaders don’t decide who will run for election, etc. – the ideology of American parties is not very distinctive – they are electoral machines – they help people get elected to Congress and help us organize our thinking. * Political parties have existed since the first decade of the new government’s existence. Americans have always had ambivalent feelings about them. * Parties are necessary, and they perform vital functions, they are crucial institutions when it comes to organizing competition when it comes to elections, structuring the thinking of the society. If they help us distinguish various political sides, we can start identifying with them (liberal, conservative) * Ad-hoc coalitions – built in order to pass a specific bill. Party functions: * Organize the competition * Unify the electorate * Inspire and inform voters * Translate preferences into policy * Provide loyal opposition * Organize Government * Help Govern * Act as Watchdogs * Nominate Candidates * Ensure Candidate Quality * Winner takes all election system – if you have to be big to win, it makes no sense for small parties to function. * Party systems – Multiparty and Two Party System. * Minor parties: Persistence and Frustration * American parties are fairly loose coalitions...

Words: 1802 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Occupy Wall Street Protest Movement Analysis

...Occupy Wall Street protest movement instigated by pro-environment group/ magazine Adbuster in Sept 2011 in New York City Wall Street financial district. This sociopolitical ideology that opposed good and service increasing amount. The main issues raised by Occupy Wall Street were “Social and economic inequality, greed, corruption and the perceived undue influence of corporations on government—particularly from the financial services sector. To achieve their goals, protesters acted on consensus-based decisions made in general assemblies which emphasized redress through direct action over the petitioning to authorities.” By Millennials being left wing or self-identified liberals more than a half of million signed a petition online to support the movement. However, this non- violent protest has generated comparison to Resurrection City, June 1968. From the economic disparities principle, permanent encampments, chanting, and demonstrators being forcibly removed....

Words: 785 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Civil Rights Abolition

...The Boston Tea Party, Nat Turner's slave rebellion, Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King, Edward Snowden; resistance, peaceful or not, to injustice has, since its inception, been a quintessentially American ideology, core to ensuring our tenets of civil liberty and equality go unfettered. It is ultimately on the shoulders of the citizens of a state to regulate that state as much as it is the state's responsibility to oversee its people. Therefore, when the state engages in actions which infringe on the rights of the people, with no in-built measures possible or easily accessible to lawfully enact change, those wrongfully affected ought to rise up and change those actions through force (force meaning action, not necessarily violence). An axiom...

Words: 799 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Missouri Compromise In The Civil War

...Through the course of American history a ubiquitous theme of seceding oppression and holding true to one’s rights and beliefs is accentuated, however this sweet tea of American values has been brewed by an otherwise tart source, the tea leaves of tension. In the debate over slavery which consumed nineteenth century America, proponents and opponents of free labor clashed ceaselessly. The ensuing Civil War was caused by a self-preservation instinct that each side used to substantiate their discord. Foremost, beginning with the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions, the South began to resort to outcrying against the government, as they saw their future potentially dwindle away. Thereafter, through the repercussions of the growing sectionalism and...

Words: 1655 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Party Issue Valuations

...JS 5/1/2013 POLS 3315-001 Party Issue Valuations and Reassessments Why do political parties in the United States abandon or revisit specific issues? Moreover, what is the driving force behind a party making an issue politically salient? Some examples that could be correlated with these questions could be why the Republican Party has stayed silent on issues that many old-guard Democrats feel is contentious in the current administration, why the sudden recent ideological transformation of conservative party, or why many politicians steer clear from Wall-Street related subjects (even though lashing out against bankers these days is sure to garner some attention, and most likely support from the general public). All of these examples and more will be discussed in order to provide a sufficient answer as to why issues are left behind in the dust or put out prominently on display. There are numerous factors and variables to consider when trying answering such a question, one of which could be racial factors. It’s been largely documented that Latinos have been an increasingly growing electorate, going from 1 percent of voters from the 1950s to over 11% in the twenty-first century (Abramowitz 27). With this information in mind, it would make sense that the Democratic establishment is today trying to initiate immigration reform in the United States Senate, knowing that they’ll have an increasing amount of support from their Latino electorate. It should also be noted that although...

Words: 3415 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Brecht and Theatre

...Chapter Nine: Brecht and Epic Theatre Berthold Brecht (1898-1956) was one of the most distinguished representatives of socialist realist art. As a creator, he was multi-sided: poet, dramatist, director, critic and publicist. There can be little doubt that he was one of the most significant writers of the twentieth-century. His work was the most important and original in European drama since Ibsen and Strindberg, but in many ways it is difficult to understand in itself, and to relate it to a tradition which it at once develops and criticizes. Brecht had been writing continuously since 1918, however it was the period between 1937 and 1945 that saw not only some of his finest plays – Mother Courage and Her Children, The Good Person of Szechwan, The Life of Galileo and The Caucasian Chalk Circle – but also the evolution of his most significant theories on the theatre. Brecht’s early dramas were anarchic, nihilistic, and antibourgeois. In them, he glorifies antisocial outsiders such as fortune hunters, pirates, and prostitutes; in keeping with their view on general society, the tone of these works is often cynical. In the years following his conversion to Marxism, Brecht wrote didactic plays whose style is austere and functional. These plays were intended to be performed in schools and factories by nonprofessional actors. In his later plays, Brecht combined the vitality of his early period with his Marxist beliefs to create plays that were dramatically effective, socially committed...

Words: 2608 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Black Identity in Dutchman

...“You don't know anything except what's there for you to see. An act. Lies. Device. Not the pure heart, the pumping black heart.” That statement obviously shows a form of black identity, but to argue that this is the central message of the play, does not make sense. To many’s disbelief, Dutchman is not about a search for blackness and defining a socially distinct identity, it is about becoming a man in America. Masculinity defines the ideologies of black nationalists during this time and this is the character that Jones/Baraka is trying to articulate in Dutchman. In Dutchman, Lula and Clay mention the topic of manhood during the dialogue on the train. Clay questions what they are going to talk about “endlessly” and Lula replies “your manhood”. From this exchange in conversation, we can see that Baraka is trying to construct and define black “manhood”. This type of masculinity can be described as tough, assertive, uncompromising and virile in addition to separating ones self from weak and effeminized men. Baraka and the leaders of the Black Power movement associated themselves with such definitions of manhood in order to recuperate some degree of power over long time notions of subordination created by racism. In Clay’s monologue we see how he rejects and separates himself from the less masculine men. Amidst his rant of telling Lula how he is going to kill her, he also threatens to kill the “weak-faced ofays”. Clay recognizes that these “weak-faced ofays” are separate from him and...

Words: 1023 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

War of Independence or a Revolution?

...War of Independence or a Revolution? It should be understood that without understanding the causes, course, and consequences of the American Revolution, one cannot grasp the history of the United State. The American Revolution was the political commotion during the end of the eighteenth century. The thirteen North American colonies united to break free of the British Empire and become a new nation; The United State of America. A revolution can be defined as, the change in power or the constitution stirring in a relatively short period of time. Aristotle described revolution as complete change from one constitution to another (Sinclair 190). And this is precisely what happened two centuries ago in the United State. But the question needed to be answered is, was the American War of Independence really a war for independence or a revolution? The American War of Independence (1775–1783) was a climax in the political American Revolution rather than just a war for independence, ideologically influenced by the Enlightenment philosophers and writers of the Great Britain. Benjamin Rush remarked in 1787, "The American war is over, but this is far from being the case with the American Revolution. On the contrary, nothing but the first act of the great drama is closed." 2 This drama staged in the Pennsylvania State House in summer of 1776 remains the only most important chapter in the archives of American Revolution. Although, the political atmosphere in France...

Words: 4544 - Pages: 19