...Has President Bush’s “No Child Left Behind Act of 2001” policy achieved the desired socioeconomic leverage for the people of color in America? Introduction The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 was enacted by President George W. Bush to give socioeconomic leverage to the people of color in America. The Act which was successfully passed by the U.S. Congress in 2001, sought to make quality elementary and secondary education accessible to disadvantaged students, particularly, the children of color people. The Act is an upgrade of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) passed during President Lyndon Johnson’s time in office in 1965 to help states create a leveled field for children living in poverty. The primary goal of the Act was to...
Words: 2317 - Pages: 10
...The No Child Left behind act was signed into law by President George W. Bush on January 8th, 2002. It was designed to improve student achievements and to help schools and parents work together to create educational solutions for struggling students. The act focuses mainly on standards, accountability, parental options, and to close the achievement gap between low-income and minority students and their peers. The act was designed to provide all children in the public school system with an equal opportunity to obtain a better education. Bush said, "The fundamental principle of this bill is that every child can learn, we expect every child to learn, and you must show us whether or not every child is learning." The No Child Left Behind act set...
Words: 1386 - Pages: 6
...|No Child Left behind Act: | | | |The impact on school personnel | | | |11/20/2012 | | | Table of Contents ________________________________________________________________________ Executive Summary 2 What is the No Child Left Behind Act? 3 What are the repercussions of not following this Act? 3 How the Act affects Teachers? 4 How the Act affects higher personnel? 5 The positive of the Act 8 Executive summary During Bush’s first term, he passed an education law to implement new, tougher testing standards as well as requirements for accountability on the states. Basically each year students have to improve better than last year’s students ultimately making the goal of 100% passing of the standardize tests a reality. This law is called the No child Left Behind Act. Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is how the U.S. Department of Education determines the performance of every public school and school district in the country academically...
Words: 1791 - Pages: 8
...On January 8, 2002, President George Bush signed the No Child Left Behind act of 2001 into a law. This law was designed to help students who otherwise may be considered to be disadvantaged. This act requires states and schools to develop testing standards in the basic skills that a child needs to succeed in school. These tests will help determine where a child may be struggling and requires more help in such areas. These tests are only done to certain grade levels throughout their years in school. This is not done every year to every grade. Children are tested annually in reading and math, a test in science during each type of schooling (elementary, middle, and high schools), and each school must have a group of 4th and 8th graders take a national assessment. The national assessment helps determine where the schools rank against other schools in the nation. (Seldman, 2011) For states to qualify for federal funding from the government, they must give these tests to children. There is no specific standard that each child must meet at a national level. Each state develops their own set of requirements that a child must meet. This act tries to make states be more responsible in providing good education for the children. The No Child Left Behind act has a lot of pros and cons that has come along with it. One of the bigger pros of this act would be that schools and teachers now have a higher level of accountability for their student’s education. Schools have their own set of accountability...
Words: 1712 - Pages: 7
...| | | | | | | | The No Child Left Behind Act Outline “The No Child Left Behind Act” is the most recent reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of 1965. This law holds the states as well as the schools accountable for the academic achievements of the students as funds are being supplied to the states for this purpose. This law requires quality teaching by highly qualified teachers and yearly assessment of student progress in English, mathematics and science skills. The progress of the students needs to be reported in terms of percentage of students scoring at the ‘proficient’ or higher level. Different subgroups categories need also report the progress annually. A standardized test method has been chosen in each state and based on the scores in that test the performance level of the students and their schools is judged. This law acquired huge range of controversy since its implementation...
Words: 3656 - Pages: 15
...“After No Child Left Behind (NCLB) passed in 2002, the US slipped from 18th in the world in math on the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) to 31st place in 2009” (Standardized Testing). The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was passed by George W. Bush on January 8, 2002. The Act required all United States students have 100% proficiency on state reading and math test by the year 2014 (Standardized Tests). Since this act has been passed by Congress there has been a wide debate over the requirements and standardized test. The No Child Left Behind Act is not an effective educational policy because the teaching focus is on standardized testing, there is a negative impact on students, and penalizing on schools and teachers for not...
Words: 822 - Pages: 4
...No Child Left Behind Diane Nickerson-Baylor EDU623: Introduction to Teaching & Learning Dr. Susan Hughes July 1, 2013 No Child Left Behind The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), which was created in 2002, remains a force which has been misunderstood since it origin. According to Fawn Johnson (2011) the No Child Left Behind Act streaked out its tenth year anniversary and even thought time has slipped away, the No Child Left Behind Act still reveals deep holes in its organization. However, there are some wardens that stand by its principle and believe public schools should be responsible for every student in their school. Also, they believe that every child can study and absorb information in school which would lead to learning daily in school. However, Linda Darling (2011) states that No Child Left Behind was considered a major victory for all American children, predominantly those in customarily schools. Yet years later the debate in congress continues to change the laws and reorganize the tone of No Child Left Behind. For example, many Republicans have spoken up with their concerns about No Child Left Behind while some baby Democrats are looking for a change in the program as well. Nevertheless, Joel Spring (2008) insists that No Child Left Behind was designed as a tool to develop learning equally in all schools and every child would get an equal learning chance. Furthermore, the objective was to remove poverty in...
Words: 953 - Pages: 4
...No Child Left behind Act– Final ENG 122 English Composition II August 19, 2014 The No Child Left behind Act has weakened the sense of community in the educational system, often causing a sense of hopelessness to be more obvious among disadvantaged students or neglected educational systems. Throughout the ages one theme among a populace of peoples of common mind, language and religion along with survival that has maintained its importance is education or knowledge of its peoples. People throughout the ages attained different degrees of education but its importance was vital to the survival and advancement of what once were nomadic tribes to the nation states we now know of today. Many famous philosophers liked to give their opinion on the merit of a good education, their disgust with ignorance or how education or the lack of knowledge was a powerful political tool. While ignoring the fact that an education wasn’t available to all people’s and in many parts of the world this is still the case even in the twenty-first century. Take a look at a world map, how many continents can you name? How many countries can you identify? How many of those countries speak a common language and share common ideals and values, forms of governance and religion. That wouldn’t be possible without an education or a system that at least at some basic level provided for an increase in the general of its people. The mighty and the great, the warriors and the kings, along with the humble peasant...
Words: 2318 - Pages: 10
...No Child Left Behind Luisa Villalba EDU623 Professor Smith November 5, 2012 The No Child Left Behind act was put in place to help better educate America’s youth. The NCLB act shines light on our education system, and how our focus needs to be on educating our children. Explore what the NCLB act was intended to do its pros and cons, and President Obama’s fight to reform NCLB. In 2001 President George W. Bush proposed a federal law known as The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB). The law supports several federal programs intended to improve U.S. schools by raising the standards of responsibility for school districts, schools, and states. The law also allows room for parents to choose the schools they would like their children to attend. The NCLB act concentrates on increasing reading, and math sores nationwide. The objective of the NCLB act is that all students meet state guidelines set in hopes of students reaching their full academic potential. Funding for the NCLB act is divided into quite a few sections, or titles. For example * Title I, Part A focuses on obtaining resources for disadvantaged students. This is done by providing funding to bring qualified educators into the classroom. * Title 1, Part D ensures that children who are found to delinquent, or neglected receive quality education while in detention centers, or institutions. * Title II, Part A concentrates on bettering the quality of teachers, and principals. This title...
Words: 1089 - Pages: 5
...The Future of American Education: No Child Left Behind Finding common ground, the United States Congress passed an act in 2001 shortly after George W. Bush took office. Originally proposed by President Bush’s administration, the act “No Child Left Behind” (NCLB) received overwhelming bipartisan support. Originally intended to address widespread perceptions that public education was falling far short of expectations, the act has received much criticism. Indeed, almost ten years after the act was signed into law by President Bush on January 8, 2002 there is overwhelming evidence that the NCLB law is deeply flawed and is doing more harm than good in our nation’s public schools. Public recognition of the law’s shortcomings has produced a growing consensus of a fundamental need for overhaul. A new conception of the federal role in education needs to be addressed beyond standards, tests and punishment. Our nation’s schools need to be strengthened in order to truly leave no child behind, but how did such a promising law go so wrong? Reviewing the NCLB act there are many positive attributes: accountability standards are set and measured annually by each state to promote and foster educational growth and achievement; standards are set for teacher qualifications; reading, writing and math are emphasized; educational status and growth by ethnicity are measured to help close the achievement gap between white and minority students; schools are required to focus...
Words: 1245 - Pages: 5
...The No Child Left Behind Act By: Carroll Zentz Abstract The No Child Left behind Act is a law that was formulated by George W. Bush within one week of being in office in 2001. A few months later the law passed in January of 2002. The reason the No Child Left behind Act was enacted was to better the education for the children of America. The No Child Left behind Act is a very controversial topic, due to the lack of funding provided by the government, and how teachers get laid off for not being deemed �highly qualified� teachers. However, statistics have indicated that the No Child Left behind Act has helped to make an improvement in the education for the youth of America. No Child Left Behind Act The No Child Left behind (NCLB) Act is now a United States federal law that was created to improve the public school system. This is the first amendment that has been made since the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965. President George W. Bush felt that the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was inadequate. So he devised his own way to try and improve it, thus creating the No Child Left behind Act. Another reason George W. Bush created the No Child Left behind Act is because he was noticing that the achievement gap between minority students and white students was growing. The No Child Left behind Act has many theories that should equal perfection according to President Bush. Some of these theories entail all students being proficient by the 2013-2014...
Words: 1913 - Pages: 8
...Kaitlin Margaret Norris Kessler April 16, 2012 Is There Really No Child Left Behind? The No Child Left Behind Act, also known as NCLB was put into affect in 2002 by President George W. Bush. This law affects how students learn, the tests they take, and the way teachers are trained. It’s stated goal is to close the achievement gap between minority and non-minority students, between the disadvantaged and the advantaged, and between those living in poverty and those that are wealthy. After given a standardized test every year, the school is required to take different actions if their school does not improve each year such as directing a chunk of it’s funding to teacher development, giving students the option to transfer, changing it’s curriculum, or having the school shut down altogether. My claim is that we should adjust or amend the No Child Left Behind Act. No Child Left Behind’s attempt to narrow achievement gaps by ensuring that all children receive a quality education is admirable, but it is hardly realistic. Teachers would have to devote their entire time to teaching specifically just math and English. By doing that they block out any other subjects such as science, history, art, or any other important elective or subject. We should adjust the law by having less harsh punishments that way the students and teachers are not constantly stressing, and most importantly because we want to keep the students from doubting themselves academically. Some people may argue...
Words: 1594 - Pages: 7
...No Child Left Behind: Reformed Education By: Alicia Faulk University of Phoenix June 22, 2015 Rebecca Hewett President George W. Bush signed a new education bill that may change the way you learn at school (“No Child,” 2002, p. 4). Advocates saw it as a way to hold schools accountable and provide workable standards of proficiency in education (“No Child,” 2015). Even though the No Child Left Behind Act was passed in 2001 it wasn't signed into law on January 8, 2002 (“No Child,” 2004, p. 1). The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is to ensure that all kids receive a first class education, making sure teachers are highly qualified, and the schools accountability to ensure that the children are learning by test results. The NCLB Act is aimed at improving the performance of every public school (“No Child,” 2002 p. 4). According to (Sunderman, 2009, p. 547), education is typically viewed as a state and local responsibility related to core educational functions, but the NCLB move this relationship in the direction of expanding the federal role over states, while strengthening the roles of states over local districts. While the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) is the most significant and controversial change, the government assumed a major role in education in the 1960s (Sunderman 2009, p. 546 ). The new bill also requires all states to "set high standards of achievement" for students, and forces them to come up with ways to measure student performance...
Words: 923 - Pages: 4
...No Child Left Behind, Does it Work? Debra Roberson Ashford University No Child Left Behind In 2001, then President G.W. Bush introduced the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act. The U.S. Congress, with bipartisan support, passed the act. The NCLB Act was brought about to combat the rising and devastating social divide within the educational system. “The law targeted early learning, measuring student performance, offering options to failing schools, and ensuring more resources for schools” (Dolgoff, 2009, p. 125). The 1965 Elementary and Second Education Act allotted funding for primary and secondary education. This act was put in place to make sure all children were given equal education and equal opportunities with their education. (The Santa Fe New Mexican, pp. 1- 2003, A.1.) The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 is a reauthorization of the 1965 ESA. New standards were put in place that required schools to meet certain criteria or lose funding for their schools. The NCLB Act has 37 categories that each school must meet. There are also 10 specific guidelines for AYP, Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Ten Categories: The Adequate Yearly Progress allows the government to determine how a school is performing academically based on the results of the required standardized tests. The Department of Education guidelines for the AYP are: 1. A single statewide accountability system, which is applied to all public schools and local education agencies...
Words: 1658 - Pages: 7
...Tabara Kromah English composition 10/25/14 The cause and effects of No Child Left Behind Most people have heard about the no child left behind act from 2002 to this present time. No child left behind was signed by the former President George W. Bush. This act was established to show improvement in school performance of America primary and secondary schools. This act cause a lot of neglect to the important and interesting subjects, because they are non -tested subjects, such as art, social studies, health and even music. The NCLB is causing problems because student’s who don’t meet these standard have to face a lot of consequences No child left behind act does more harm than good as it ruin funding for schooling and it also places too much attention on testing. For instance, school are place on different levels according to the percentage of students passing the standardized test that is given in the subject areas. Schools that don’t have a high percentage of students passing the examination are put on probationary status. These school are even forced to undergo review by the state over the next year and if they don’t improve in these subjects, they will be at risk of losing their accreditation. furthermore, school may reach the point where they have to be shut down or relocate students. Some of the teachers are going home late and not having enough time to go home and relax because they are providing tutoring to increase their...
Words: 1784 - Pages: 8
