Premium Essay

The Referendum of Scotland

In: Social Issues

Submitted By Pedokalle
Words 541
Pages 3
Its member states have started asking for independence – what’s the right way to go for the United Kingdom?

Last week the independence Referendum took place in Scotland. It was an important decision for the brave Scots. Even if a slim majority voted against the independence of Scotland, more and more devolution states around Europe try to get independent. The latest example is Catalonia in Spain, where the Referendum will be on 9th of November. It is not necessary to say that there are more states which want to become independent. However the question is coming up: Why do these federal states want to become independent or why don’t they? What will happen to the rest states which are left? Let´s begin with the question of why states try to be independent? For this question we need of course to look at the advantages of getting independent. There we have to look in the first place at the economic situation in Spain or the political situation in Scotland. Spain is in a big financial crisis. They have an unstable economic system, because the banks invested too much money building new houses and renting them to people, who can´t effort it. So they lost all their money. Catalonia is the richest and economic most powerful state in Spain so if they got a nation on their own there would be a higher welfare. Another advantage would be the political self-destination as in Scotland. As a devolution state they can’t decide what they want to change in their own country, because all powers are in England. When the government in London says “No” to something they wanted to do, Scotland can’t change anything. These are a few arguments which the states bring into their voting campaigns and it is working. 45% of the Scottish people voted yes. What will happen to the remaining territories? That’s an important question too. According to the arguments above, you can see...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Referendum Scotland

...First of all we are very grateful for your letter, and appreciate the time you took describing your arguments. The day of referendum gets closer, and debates for and against Scotland’s independence get more and more intense. Scotland is about to enter a new era, even if a yes vote is viewed on, with different perspectives by different parts of both Scotland and the remaining countries behind the United Kingdom. The end or beginning is close, and the breathtaking discussions will finally come to an end. We will give you the best reasons to stay under Great Britain’s wing, and give you the best arguments that hopefully will change your mind. Expressed by Mr. Salmon, the main income for Scotland as an independent nation, would be oil, but we all know that oil is like other fossil fuel kinds, a finite recourse which doesn’t last forever, and can’t generate recourse for ever. A lot of countries have been very rich becouse of their oil possession, but as we have seen oil runs out, and they desperately have to seek greater income recourses Another solution for a stable income, would be a higher tax for the individual, which probably would result in less financial growth caused by the minimized private sector. There is another solution, if Scotland stays in the union, the leading parties in Great Britain will provide a stable economy and fulfill Scotland political wishes, which will cause more influence in the parliament from Scotland’s perspective. This scenario would......

Words: 414 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

The Uk Would Benefit Greatly from the Wider Use of Referendums? Discuss.

... A referendum is a form of direct democracy that involves a public vote on a single issue of public policy. It is a way of presenting a debated issue to public decision. The most recent referendum was in the UK; the 2014 Scottish Independence Referendum which asked the question whether Scotland should break away from the UK or not. There are a variety of arguments both for and against the wider use of referendum in the UK. The use was greatly favoured by Tony Blair and his new Labour government in 1997 because they took the view that referendum was a democratic device that allows people the opportunity to give a direct voice in decision making. Therefore, any decision made via referendum acquires legitimacy because it has popular approval. Moreover, referendums can encourage political participation which will help the declining participation of the UK in the way that as referendums are where people can get directly involve in the decision making, they will see this as opportuniy to contribute to the political world as themselves, thereby encouraging them to turn out in election to vote and increase participation like in the 2014 Scottish referendum where the participation brough about a turnout of 84.59% compared to the 2010 general election turnout of 65.1%. Shown clearly in the example is the clear difference between participation of direct democracy and representative democracy which would greatly benefit the UK's declining political participation. Referendums......

Words: 1067 - Pages: 5

Free Essay


...English Assignment 2: Dear Britain I. Analyse Baker’s letter “Dear Britain”. The letter Dear Britain is written by Matt Baker on the 5th of January 2014. The letter is published on National Collective. It was written fourteen days before the Scottish referendum to clear things out between England and Scotland. Matt baker is a presenter and a supporter of the independence for Scotland. Therefore he will vote yes when the Scottish referendum comes. Baker writes in a formal language throughout his letter. His way of writing gives the letter a more serious touch, which makes the letter serious. In the letter Baker’s argues that the situation not only affects the Scottish people. But also people living in Britain in general. Baker says that if Scotland votes yes for the referendum and becomes independent, then Wales will probably do the same and start a national debate about splitting from England which makes England the only country left in Great Britain. If the Scottish people decide to vote yes for independence and therefore separates from England, then it will have an influence on the English government resources. It will have an affect on the resources because then they will loose the North Sea Oil. According to Matt the independence is not an issue regarding income and rank. It also includes human lives, which puts it all in different perspective. The human needs should always come first and be above everything else. No human beings should feel helpless......

Words: 806 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay


...Explain the term referendum used in the extract (5 marks) A referendum is a general vote by the electorate on a single political question which has been referred to them for a direct decision. They may be used to raise issues for discussion rather than to decide or confirm policy questions. In relation to the extract, Walsi is being accused of not having the knowledge base of understanding of actual independence. Walsi was being accountable for shortfall in any economic growth expected and being able to financially match the living needs of people, the needs of all generations - from health / population growth. 05) Using your own knowledge, as well as the extract, consider the circumstances in which the UK government might choose to call a referendum (10 marks) Only one nationwide referendum had taken place in the UK before the alternative referendum. This occurred in 1975 when Harold Wilson (the British Prime minister at the time) asked ‘Do you think the UK should stay in the EU?’ In answer to his question, 67% of the voters answered ‘yes’ so therefore the UK is still part of the EU today. Not only one referendum has happened, several referendums have also been held in particular regions of the UK such as Scotland and Wales. In 1997, voters in Scotland were asked whether they wanted a Scottish Parliament while voters in Wales were asked whether they wanted a Welsh Assembly. The answer to both of these referendums was yes. Also, just recently: - Scotland has been......

Words: 1280 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Explain Three Criticism of Referendums (10)

...Referendums is when electorate are given on a single important or constitutional issue directly themselves. Ex – UK should remain in EU/ Scotland’s independence. Parliament and Government decide whether a referendum is held. Referendums are decided by yes/no answers. In some counties the outcomes are binding but in the UK they are not as parliament is sovereign. Firstly, It undermines parliamentary sovereignty and undermines representative democracy. representative democracy is at the heart of the democratic process and despite flaws, elected MP’s need to be allowed to carry out functions and duties which they have been elected to do so. Is is clear, some issues are too complex for a yes/no decision . Such an example is the promised referendum the EU . This is not of average knowledge. So we elect MPs to represent views. Also, referendums bypass parliamentary system and therefore serve to undermine parliament sovereignty rather than promote democracy. Further, no parliament can stop future governments amending or appealing legislation and so it is unlikely public opinion decisions are always final as they can go back and change them. Additionally, voters show little desire to participate in referendums. For example ,41% voted in the may 2011 AV referendum over possible changes to voting system in the house of commons, 35% voters turned out for the referendum in Wales over devolving further powers to welsh assembly in march 2011. As well as poor support for the mayoral......

Words: 386 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

The Creative Industries and Scottish Film.

... With its exquisite landscapes, monumental architecture, and breath-taking coastlines, it is no wonder Scotland has always been such a powerful draw to film makers and producers alike. The Scottish film industry has grown from strength to strength in recent years. Arguably putting itself on the map in the nineties with films such as Braveheart (1995) and Trainspotting (1996), Scotland now lends its locations to multimillion-pound productions such as Skyfall (2012), The Dark Knight Rises (2012), Sunshine on Leith (2013) and The Railway Man (2014) as well as TV productions including Game of Thrones (2011) and Outlander (2014). To what extent have Scottish films such as Braveheart and Trainspotting impacted on the tourism industry and given their contrasting portrayals of the Scots, does one hinder tourism more than the other? Can we say whether or not there is a distinct notion of ‘Scottish national identity’ and if such a concept exists to what level is it illustrated in Scottish film? Has the Scottish film industry had an impact on the political landscape in Scotland since it was devolved in 1998? Finally given the effects of Scottish film in Scotland, what has the government put in place in order to develop the industry further? Scotland has produced many world renowned films over the last two decades and has had a large impact on the creative industries in Scotland. It has long retained a certain romance which frequently appeals to both UK and global audiences, no......

Words: 5642 - Pages: 23

Premium Essay

To What Extent Is Parliament Still Sovereign?

...To what extent is parliament still sovereign? For many years it has been argued that parliamentary sovereignty has, and still is, being eroded. As said by AV Dicey, the word ‘sovereignty’ is used to describe the idea of “the power of law making unrestricted by any legal limit”. Parliamentary sovereignty is a principle of the UK constitution, stating that Parliament is the supreme legal authority in the UK, able to create and remove any law. This power over-rules courts and all other jurisdiction. It also cannot be entrenched; this is where all laws passed by the party in government can be changed by future parliaments. In recent years sovereignty of parliament has been a In 1972 the UK joined the treaty of accession, this was a statute law passed by parliament. It stated that the UK was now a part of the EU and therefore must abide by the laws and regulations that would be imposed; over 2,900 regulations and 410 directives were added, 43 volumes of the EU legislation. Due to having joined over 30 years after the initial EU was created, the UK has been made to accept laws that had been made without its input. Whereas now, having joined the EU, we are involved in in their creation - this is a key argument for why we should remain a member. Joining the EU has been agued as being a pinnacle point at which the UK lost its sovereignty, as this was the first time in the history of parliament where absolute power was no longer held. Research done by the TPA (Taxpayers......

Words: 898 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

How Do Referendums Work in the Uk

...In a referendum, the government asks members of the public to help decide on an important issue. Everyone of voting age has the right to take part. Voting in a referendum is a bit like voting in a general election: people visit their nearest polling station and respond to a question with a ‘yes’ or ‘no’ answer by marking a box on a ballot paper. Referendum on the alternative vote On 5 May 2011, voters in the UK were asked to take part in a referendum to decide whether they wanted to change the way we vote in general elections. They had a choice between the first past the post system, which was already in use, and the alternative vote. You can find out how both of these systems work by visiting our interactive whiteboard on elections and voting, and selecting 'Compare the vote' from the main menu. The Liberal Democrats and Conservatives agreed to hold this referendum as part of the coalition agreement – their decision to form a government together. 68% of the voters who took part in the referendum chose to keep using the first past the post system and 32% wanted to change to the alternative vote. As a result, first past the post will continue to be used in UK general elections.   Other referendums in the UK Before the alternative vote referendum, only one nationwide referendum had taken place in the UK. This was in 1975 when the British Prime Minister Harold Wilson asked voters ‘Do you think the UK should stay in the European Community (Common Market)?’ (The Common......

Words: 793 - Pages: 4

Free Essay


...Scotland and the brave. Scotland could soon become an independent state. On the 21. March 2013. The Scottish Government announced that there would be held a referendum on the 18’th of September 2014. On this day we will be right there witnessing it. Some facts on this topic is who can vote. * British citizens in Scotland. * Commonwealth citizens resident in Scotland who have leave to remain in the UK or do not require such leave. * Citizens of the Republic of Ireland and other EU countries resident in Scotland. * Members of the House of Lords resident in Scotland. * Service Personnel serving in the UK or overseas with the armed forces who are registered to vote in Scotland. * Crown personnel serving outside the UK with HM Government who are registered to vote in Scotland. * The minimum age of voting will be 16 instead of 18. What could happen if Scotland got separated from the rest of UK? Some of the negatives could be that if Scotland voted yes on the 18’Th of September, Scotland would then become an independent land. Therefore, Scotland would be splitting up the Union Jack, which also will have an impact on England or Northern Ireland. A completely new set of rules would have to be created. This could create all new kind of problems. If we look at the rules as they are now, people are used to it after been living it all these years. If we take a look on the immigration policy. The UK’s view on immigration might not be the same as what......

Words: 829 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Scotland's Indepence

...Scotland’s independence  Scotland is changing the “norms” by trying to get more leisure to their policies to  eventually get more freedom in their state, and, if possible, become totally independent. The  question to ask now is, what is England's response to this movement. Will they follow in  somewhat of the same tracks, or take another path. I think that England will not follow in the  same tracks as Scotland, but I do think that sometime in the near future, Scotland can become  independent. On September 19th, scotland had polled a 55%­45% vote, (which is not its first  time trying to gain independence) keeping its connection and staying with the United Kingdom.  In this, scotland wants to have the freedom to be able to create and or change its policies. The  main two theories that will be addressed throughout this paper are; structuralism and culturalism.   Scotland for many decades has been trying to gain its independence. February 1989 was  arguably Scotland's biggest starting point for independence. There was a big outrage on if  scotland was an independent country, would it be better off. While the optimistic bunch had  thought that it would, it ended up losing a poll, 24% to 76%. In a Scottish poll on television,  when the people were asked whether or not they wanted to stay with Europe or break away, the  majority of them wanted to stay connected to Europe. But, when the poll asked the same people  if they wanted to have an Independent Scotland countr......

Words: 2052 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Should Scotland Become Independent?

...Scottish Referendum Should Scotland become independent? The fight for Scottish independence grows ever more intense as the referendum looms over us all, with less than a week to go it seems neck and neck which makes this unravelling drama ever more exciting, but the question still remains, will Scotland get its long awaited independence? The possibility of a YES and a NO vote are level and this essay will look at the arguments for and against Scottish independence. Say Scotland do get there independence, what does that mean for them and for the rest of the UK. Firstly for Scotland it would mean taking full responsibility by moving all governing powers to Scottish soil. This is a huge benefit for the Scottish people because their votes for their general election will be valued more due to the fact that the new government will be more focused on the needs and requirements of the Scottish people, not the divided needs of the UK public. Another benefit for Scotland if the YES vote was to go ahead is that they will no longer have to build nuclear power stations and instead could spend that money elsewhere, for example education, this optimises their opportunity cost as well. Sticking to the topic of energy, Scotland will keep 90% of the oil from the oil reserves in the North Sea which could financially boost Scotland’s economy and trade with other nations. These points just prove that Scotland has the resources and finances to carry themselves forward as an independent......

Words: 927 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

To What Extent Has the Location of Sovereignty Changed in the Uk in Recent Yeas?

...unchallengeable power. Parliamentary Sovereignty, which makes Parliament the supreme legal authority in the UK, is threatened by devolution. Devolution was the transfer of power to subnational governments, this changed the UK into a quasifederal state; central government does not make all domestic policies, this means that laws passed in Westminster do not apply across the entire territory of the UK. The shift of Westminster’s power has led to a raft of different legislation emanating from these new bodies. This is illustrated by the fact that in England students pay fees for University whereas Scotland decided to keep university fees completely free. The devolution of power has put a constraint on Parliamentary Sovereignty. However it can be argued that devolution preserves in principle the sovereignty of Parliament. The Westminster Parliament could continue to legislate for Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland even on devolved matters; and it can, if it wishes, simply abolish the devolved bodies by a simple Act of Parliament, as it did with the Northern Ireland Parliament in 1972. Secondly, the UK's legal sovereignty is challenged by the EU. The membership of the EU, along with the introduction of the Human Rights Act 1998, has diminished the supremacy of Parliament. The legal basis for British Membership was provided by the European Communities Act 1972, the constitutional implications of this act meant that EU regulations did not need to receive an......

Words: 513 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Government and Politics

...Since 1997 England’s uncodified constitution has seen a significant amount of change. Westminster has devolved some of its power, an Act protecting and stating human rights has been established and a referendum is due to be held in 2014 on whether or not Scotland should have a codified constitution. While one could argue that discussions as to whether the upper house should be elected or appointed have not yet reached a decision, and it has taken over a decade for a devolved assembly to have the chance to be independent, it would appear that constitutional changes have gone as far as they are ever going to, however it ... gone far enough. Parts of the British political system were seen as undemocratic, especially during Labour’s terms in office in the late 1990’s, in particular the House of Lords (HOL). The Labour government set out to remove all hereditary peers in 1999; instead they abolished all but 92 and now promoted life peers as an alternative. Many Lords and Ladies are offered a place in the HOL either for service, such as previous MP’s, or due to their particular knowledge in a field, such as Alan Sugar as he has a vast amount of knowledge in business. However this was the last reform made, no more hereditary peers have been abolished, the question on whether or not to make the upper house elected is still on-going and previous conservative MP’s still hold more seats than any other party thus making the HOL unrepresentative and undemocratic. Therefore many argue......

Words: 2489 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Low Levels of Participation

...Some people claim that the rice in the quantity of passive political participation is forming democratic crisis in Britain. The main purpose of this essay is to explore the problem of low levels of participation and its connection with crisis of democracy. Firstly, it will highlight the role of parliament. Secondly, it will evaluate drawbacks and benefits of election systems and the devolution. Thirdly, it will illustrate the roles of political parties and low results of participation in elections. Possibilities for and trends of becoming participated in the political process by people is political participation. Generally, political participation contains a number of points such as awareness of current issues, supporting online forums, taking part in all kinds of elections, standing for political office, joining and becoming active in pressure group and political party and participating in physical and e-petitions (McNaughton: 2012). Vlassopoulos (2009:29) mentions that direct popular participation in making decisions is the vital aspect in definition of democracy. One of the main functions of Parliament is representation. This means that elected MPs should represent and defend the interests of their voters. However, in real life citizens have no significant impact on the activities of legislators. Another important function is that it is the origin of political authority and exercising of power is impossible without Parliament’s sanction. Furthermore, the UK government......

Words: 1538 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Scottish Independence

...------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Introduction The subject I have analyzed in this research paper is the possible independence of Scotland. I chose this topic because the Scottish independence is a problem of great importance not only for the UK and Scotland, but also for the whole Europe. While doing my research I found very strong and opposing opinions about this recent topic. Scottish independence is a relevant and important matter that has been debated for many years but is now at the pinnacle of debate. Both public and politicians and opposing opinions about independence and throughout this work I will evaluate the most current and most emotive arguments for and against independence. First, I will speak about the historical background of this issue and about the parties “fighting” for independence. Next, I will represent for and against arguments, which will help to understand this complicated issue. Chapter I General information Scotland was an independent country from 843, with the unification of the Scots and Picts. In medieval times, Scotland fought for freedom from England, which Mel Gibson dramatically depicted in his Academy Award-winning movie "Braveheart." Not long after Wallace died in the early 1300s, Robert the Bruce led Scotland to independence, and it remained an...

Words: 2480 - Pages: 10