The Review of' Foundations of the Theory of Organization' and Bureaucracy

In: Other Topics

Submitted By DeusexmacinaPJ
Words 597
Pages 3
Foundations of the Theory of Organization
In this reading, organization is defined by Selznick as “a system of consciously coordinated activities or forces of two or more persons.” Usually, an organization can be viewed either as an economy, or an adaptive social structure. For Selznick, to view the organization as an economy is scientific and measurable, while an adaptive social structure leans toward the non-exact behavioral sciences. He thus advocated the wide adoption of ‘structural-functional analysis’ as the basis of theory and method of analysis of organization, which addresses the composite of mechanical structures and individual personalities that make up the cooperating, structured system of organization. The three major ideas in his theory of organization based on this reading are: organizations as cooperative, adaptive social systems; the conflict of personal and organizational goals and needs; and controlling conflict for the good of the organization. Finally, he talks about co-optation, which is a method of protecting the organization and its mission by inviting threatening elements into the policy making process.
From my perspective, Selznick seems to overemphasize the rational structures and mechanistic processes of organizational activities. What is clear in examining this reading is the idea that a well-functioning organization has to proceed in unison-as a whole unit rather than as individual parts attempting to meet individuals’ goals. The whole organization functions like the human body that when any of the elements within the structure begins to fail, it must has a deleterious effect on the entire body. And, like when our body is experiencing a conflict of some sort, it tells us by our experiencing pain or discomfort, the organization, as an adaptive structure, is elaborated to preserve and maintain its stability and continuity mechanically…...

Similar Documents

Organizations Theory

...1. Define organization. Do you think that it is correct to assert that organizations enable human beings to accomplish more that smaller human associations, such as families, tribes, and groups? Why or why not? a) An organization is a social unit or group that has been put together with the soul purpose to maintain or obtain certain specific goals that are set forth. b) Yes I believe is that organizations are able to accomplish more than smaller organizations because of the diversity that is inherent with these organizations that is not present in most smaller organizations. In an organization you can replace members to form a better union of ideas and actions, which is something than can not be done in a family or other smaller grouping of people. I cannot count how many times I have thought that my group of friends, or even my family, would be better off and able to be a better group as a whole if only we could replace certain members that did not belong. 2. Differentiate between organizational theory and organizational behavior. Which of the two is the most useful to understand from the perspective of managers? Why? a) Organizational theory attempts to explain or predict how an organization achieves it's goal and ambitions. While one the other hand, organizational behavior is more focused on the study of individual behavior, actions, and attitudes of the individuals within an organization. Theory takes a wide ranging view of an organizations while behavior focuses...

Words: 319 - Pages: 2

Reviews of Theories

... Reviews of Theories of Emotion Causation Jennifer Tang Yii Ting B1201569 Department of Psychology PSY 111 Mr. Alex Lui Tutorial 8 Ms. Karuna Sarah The factor of differentiation, intensity, or elicitation are argued frequently should be listed down using the theories of emotion. There are spontaneous bodily responses, which is actuating by noncognitive yet witting perceptual states caused emotion, corresponding by Williams James. James (1890, vol. 2, p.449) reported, “emotions are perceptions of bodily responses: An emotion is our “feeling” of the “bodily changes” following upon the perception of an “exciting fact”.” Descartes and James’s theories often grouped together as both of them indicated that the go through of emotions and passions are caused by the sensory stimulation precede. Furthermore, James and Carl Georg Lange theories about emotion joint together and formed the “James-Lange theory” of emotion. The James-Lange theory gives a clear idea on the nature of emotions starting on comparing the changes in physiological within the body and emotions. However, Lange’s suggest mechanism that touch on emotion would be less accurate and it was connected with James’s theory while it makes Lange’s work become less famous. While defining for emotions, several types of components are dropped down since it is contemplate as a prototypical emotional episode. Here comes the component: cognitive component, feeling component, motivational component, somatic component, and motor......

Words: 1189 - Pages: 5

Organization Theory Research Paper

...Compare, Contrast and Discuss Mechanistic vs. Organic Structures Vance Conyers Organizational Theory 360A 28 September 2012 Organization structure is “The formal system of task and authority relationships that control how people coordinate their actions and use resources to achieve goals”. (Jones 8) The structure that an organization forms can determine its ultimate success of failure. It sets the foundation for how the organization will function, make decisions, and respond to change. The two types of structures an organization can use are mechanic and organic. Mechanistic and organic structures both have advantages and disadvantages, and neither one is a perfect solution. Depending on the product, tasks to create the product, and people to create the product, make the decision very challenging. In most cases, elements of both types are implemented to ensure a successful business. The executive management is responsible for formulating the right mix in order to achieve success. They use organizational design to process information to select the best options. Every aspect of this decision will play out from how much power middle managers have, to the scope of responsibility direct supervisors encompass. The type of organization directly affects the culture and moral of employees. Implementation of the wrong type or mix of structure can cause mismanagement of resources (both human and physical), a toxic culture, and ultimately a failed institution. The mechanistic......

Words: 3496 - Pages: 14

Organization Theory and Design

...Adhocracy allows organizations to operate in a more flexible manner. This flexibility can work well in fast-changing industries where organizations that can identify and act on new opportunities the fastest have a competitive advantage. Adhocracy may also work best with smaller organizations where managers are still able to comprehend and direct the organization when necessary. On the other hand, adhocracy may become chaotic or inefficient in large organizations where, for example, work may be duplicated by several teams. Poorly defined working roles may prove ineffective where team members are unaware of the scope of their roles, and thus desired or necessary work is not carried out. Read more: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/adhocracy.asp#ixzz2Dxb4zHsW Bureaucracy and Adhocracy The main aim of any organisation is to reach certain predetermined goals. In an attempt to survive and obtain this goals effectively, certain decisions must be made as to what type of structure the organisation will posses which will entail guidance for individuals associated with the group as per their duties and day to day activities. Ultimately determining how efficiently the desired goals will be acquired. Questions this structure will need to confront will include the amount of specialisation in areas of work and responsibility, the levels of management and their consequent size, the grouping of departments together for functionality of expertise, and the kind of integrative......

Words: 2220 - Pages: 9

Leadership Theories in Organizations

...Leadership Theories and Styles IAAP 2009 Administrative Professionals Week  Event April 28, 2009 Development of Leadership Theory Development of Leadership Theory • Until approximately 1930, there was not much  academic interest in the area of leadership academic interest in the area of leadership • Fredrick Taylor –Scientific Management (time/motion Fredrick Taylor  Scientific Management (time/motion  studies of productivity) (late 1800’s) • Max Weber –(writing on bureaucracy)  a leader  possessed power by virtue of his position (1922) • Mary Parker Follett – participatory management in  power with as opposed to power over (1926) “power with” as opposed to “power over” (1926) Luther Gulick Notes on Organization ‐‐ 1937 • Work of the Executive Work of the Executive • POSDCORB – Planning – Organizing – Staffing – Directing – Coordinating g – Reporting – Budgeting g g Leadership  a new definition Leadership – a new definition • Chester Barnard – 1938 new definition of  leadership The ability of a superior to influence the  behavior of subordinates and persuade them  to follow a particular course of action.  (Barnard 1938) Power  French and Raven (1960) Power – French and Raven (1960) • Legitimate power – comes solely from the position the  g p y p superior holds in an organization • Reward power – comes by means of promotion, salary  increases and interesting assignments i di t ti i t • Expert power – comes from the leader possessing ......

Words: 3146 - Pages: 13

Foundation Review

...Review: Foundations Test #2 2012 What defines a classical society? Similarities and differences between them? (article) What is the definitions AND significance of the following? Rome Etruscans Latins Republic Greeks- influence? Patrician Legions Plebeian Senate Consuls Centuriate Assembly Tribal Assembly Tribunes Veto- Who had it? Praetors- How many? Twelve Tables Citizenship- who had it? Women? Times of emergency, who ruled? “Real Power” Geography? Punic Wars Hannibal? Scipio? Tiberius & Gaius Gracchus? Civil War Period? Shift from Republic to Empire? Describe Loyalty of soldier? Julius Caesar Triumvirate Crassus Pompey Ides of March Octavian? Augustus? Pax Romana? Trade system? Basis? Succession to throne? Gladiators? Entertainment? Problems with Empire? Why the Fall-specifics? Diocletian? Constantine? Huns? Germanic invasions? Attila? Byzantine Empire Romulus Augustulus? Virgil? Roman Achievements? The major contribution to Western CIF.? Dates of Republic/Empire/Byzantine Trajan? Arch/Architecture? Infrastructure? Greatest Roman Legacy? Gupta Major accomplishments of each Empire? Mauryan Chandragupta Maurya? Indian geography? Invasions into India? Arthashastra Ashoka Maurya? Kautilya? Buddhism and Hinduism? Brahmin? Collapse? Patriarchal/Matriarchal? Chandra Gupta? White Huns? Tamil? Trade......

Words: 597 - Pages: 3

Organizations and Organization Theory

...Chapter 1: Organizations and Organization Theory Current Challenges of Organizations Globalization Markets, technologies, and organizations are becoming increasingly interconnected Ethics and social responsibility The list of execs and major corporations involved in financial and ethical scandals continues to grow Speed of responsiveness Globalization and advancing technology has accelerated the pace at which organizations in all industries must roll out new products and services to stay competitive The digital workplace In today’s workplace, many employees perform much of their work on computers and may work in virtual teams, connected electronically to colleagues around the world Diversity By 2050, it is estimated that 85% of entrants into the workforce will be women and people of colour What Is an Organization? ­Organizations: social entities that are goal-directed, are designed as deliberately structured and coordinated activity system, and are linked to the external environment Types of Organizations Multinational corporations Small, family-owned shops For-profit versus non-profit organizations Organizations exist to do the following: 1. Bring together resources to achieve desired goals and outcomes 2. Produce goods and services efficiently 3. Facilitate innovation 4. Use modern manufacturing and information technologies 5. Adapt to influence a changing environment 6. Create value for owners, customers, and employees 7. Accommodate......

Words: 1385 - Pages: 6

Theory to Practice Literature Review

...THEORY TO PRACTICE LITERATURE REVIEW A PAPER SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE NURS 5013 – THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE PRAIRIE VIEW A&M UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF NURSING BY HARSHAL THOMAS, BSN, RN HOUSTON, TEXAS March 3, 2014 DeMonica Junious, PhD, RN, CNE INTRODUCTION This paper is a systematic presentation of nursing theories based on literature review. The purpose of this paper is to describe how nursing theories are applied in administrative practice. It will help to generate further nursing knowledge. Nursing theory can help patients, managers and other healthcare professionals to recognize the unique contribution that nurses make to the healthcare service. The First stage is introducing the paper. The Second stage is the body of paper which consists of six different articles from pages three to eight. Each article starts with brief description about the study following with concise review of the selected theory. About who formulated the theory and also describes the components of the theory. The middle part of the article states the reasons for using the specific theory by the author. Also describing how the theory was used and illustrates the results of the study. The article ends with explaining how that particular theory can be used in my own nursing administrative practice. The Last stage is summarizing the paper and listing the references in alphabetical......

Words: 3541 - Pages: 15

Book Review: Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It.

...Book Review Wilson, J, Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books. pp 433. Introduction: This book about bureaucracy gained much attention in the field of public administration. Along within the field of bureaucracy this book was able to become the center of interest for general public as well. This is a valuable book. The book is very informative as it caters vast group of audience i.e. start from a general public to a professional bureaucrat. This book also give an encyclopedic information to the students of management which likely to ask the questions about the government and bureaucracy. As its review of literature is very comprehensive that is why this is the most common book among the readers of content about government agencies. The book is a comprehensive and detailed. Wilson’s book is well written and depicts the real life case studies from federal agencies and government bureaucracy especially in the United States. From the start to the end of the book the author has given the detailed demonstration about the reasons what the government agencies do and why they do that in the way they do. The purpose of this book was to provide a new fresh content about the government bureaucracy along with providing comprehensive knowledge to answer the questions asked by students of public administration. The book was very useful for the audience for which it was written. In my opinion this book is a unique study of......

Words: 1154 - Pages: 5

Organization Theory

...Organization Theory Name Instructor Course Date 1.0 Title………………………………………………………………………………………2 1.1 Organization theory………………………………………………………………………4 1.2 Strategies of the new firm…………………………………………………………….4 2.0 Organizational structure………………………………………………………………….4 2.1 Organization culture……………………………………………………………………...5 2.2 Missions, visions and values……………………………………………………………..5 2.3 Data……………………………………………………………………………………....5 Organization Theory In this case merging takes place when the two separate hospitals come together. Here one hospital acquires the other through purchase or agreement. Differentiation is the main reasons that PRMC and BRMC may opt to come together. It helps in reducing risk in the market. Acquisition will enable PRMC to spread its risk through diversification. Another reason is to gain financial upper hand in the market since the hospital is operating at loses. These are mostly done by firms that are almost closing or becoming bankrupt. When firms merge, they enjoy the benefits of tax reduction. Economies of scale are another reason why PRMC and BRMC merged. This involves operation costs which are reduced when two firms merge. Both hospitals benefit in their operations. Merging takes place when two separate entities come together. Here one hospital acquires the other through purchase (Collins & Porras, 1996). Merging helped PRMC to reduce risk in the market. Acquisition enables a company to spread its risk through diversification.......

Words: 1027 - Pages: 5

The Review of' Foundations of the Theory of Organization' and Bureaucracy

...Foundations of the Theory of Organization In this reading, organization is defined by Selznick as “a system of consciously coordinated activities or forces of two or more persons.” Usually, an organization can be viewed either as an economy, or an adaptive social structure. For Selznick, to view the organization as an economy is scientific and measurable, while an adaptive social structure leans toward the non-exact behavioral sciences. He thus advocated the wide adoption of ‘structural-functional analysis’ as the basis of theory and method of analysis of organization, which addresses the composite of mechanical structures and individual personalities that make up the cooperating, structured system of organization. The three major ideas in his theory of organization based on this reading are: organizations as cooperative, adaptive social systems; the conflict of personal and organizational goals and needs; and controlling conflict for the good of the organization. Finally, he talks about co-optation, which is a method of protecting the organization and its mission by inviting threatening elements into the policy making process. From my perspective, Selznick seems to overemphasize the rational structures and mechanistic processes of organizational activities. What is clear in examining this reading is the idea that a well-functioning organization has to proceed in unison-as a whole unit rather than as individual parts attempting to meet individuals’ goals. The whole......

Words: 597 - Pages: 3

Organization Theory

...trying to integrate technology into their work processes. Today, technology has become a necessity in a company and it has been viewed often as an improvement in the efficiency of the workplace by companies. However, there has been a number of different views as to how technology will impact the organizations, the management and the employees. Modern and critical perspectives will be taken to provide different insights on how technology is been viewed and understand. Since critical theory perspective is focused on challenging the modern theory perspective, we will be able to have a greater depth of understanding on technology environmental relationships. The modernist theory emphasize on the need for power and control for profit maximization. The critical theory on the other hand, provide a social perspective on how technology has an impact to the workers and the working environment. In this essay, we will take a look at how the development of technology is perceived differently by different factors namely the modernist and critical perspectives. Modernist Theory Modern theory perspective believes in objectivism and that objective truths are vital in the management of an organization (Green & Crother, 2004). Modernist seeks truths that are objective and honest. First and foremost, employing the use of electronic technologies such as surveillance can enlarge the managerial power where it is used to monitor the workers and keep track of their work behavior.......

Words: 1973 - Pages: 8

Theory Review

...personal criminological theory review Janise harris ajs/542 instructor reyes january 19, 2015 personal criminological theory review Janise harris ajs/542 instructor reyes january 19, 2015 Personal Criminological Theory Review In criminology, analyzing why individuals perpetrate wrongdoing is imperative in the progressing level headed discussion of how crime should be taken care of and prevented. Numerous theories have developed throughout the years, and they keep on being investigated, individually and in combination, as criminologists look for the best solutions in eventually diminishing sorts and levels of crime. During the six weeks of this course we have examined several theories. Here is a review of some of the key theories: * Rational choice theory: Individuals act in their venture toward oneself and settle on choices to perpetrate wrongdoing in the wake of measuring the potential dangers against the rewards. * Social disorganization theory: An individual’s physical and social situations are basically in charge of the behavioral decisions that individual makes. * Strain theory: Many people have similar desires, yet they don’t all have the same opportunities or abilities. When individuals neglect to attain society’s desires through approved means, for example, hard work and delayed gratification, they may attempt to accomplish accomplishment through crime. * Social learning theory: Individuals create inspiration to commit crime and the......

Words: 321 - Pages: 2

Theories of Organization

...ORGANIZATION THEORY – OTHER THEORIES ➢ Neoclassical Perspective – Experts believe that management exists in a social system wherein human factors have roles to perform. Employees can play crucial roles in the decision-making process. In addition, Human Relations and Behavioral Science have become two important approaches of neoclassical theories. o Human Relations Theory / Hawthorne Studies – Spearheaded by Elton Mayo from 1924 to 1932 at the Hawthorne Plant of Western Electric Company, the team concluded that the business organization also includes social and psychological factors.  It considered organization as a social process where feelings, sentiments and attitudes were given due importance.  Mayo and Roethlisberger of Harvard Business School postulated that efficiency and productivity could increase if the attitudes of employees were well regarded. ▪ Individual workers cannot be treated in isolation, but must be seen as members of a group. ▪ The need to belong to a group and have status within is more important than monetary incentives or good physical working conditions. ▪ Informal/Unofficial groups at work exercise a strong influence over the behavior of workers ▪ Supervisors and managers deed to be aware of these social needs and cater for them if workers are to collaborate with the official organization rather than work against it. o Behavioral Science Theory –......

Words: 1074 - Pages: 5

Self Review Foundations of Communication

...Part 1 Self Review Foundations of Communication Establishing a Communication Foundation from Chapters 2 through 5 What kind of a communicator are you? This review looks at several specifics that are basic to effective communicators. On the line provided for each statement, indicate the response that best captures your behavior: 1, almost always; 2, often; 3, sometimes; 4, rarely; 5, never. __3__ When I speak, I tend to present a positive image of myself. (Chapter 2) __3__ In my behavior toward others, I look for more information to confirm or negate my first impressions. (Chapter 2) _3__ Before I act on perceptions drawn from people’s nonverbal cues, I seek verbal verification of their accuracy. (Chapter 2) __3__ I use specific language when I speak, avoiding generalizations that could be misinterpreted. (Chapter 3) __3__ I speak clearly, using words that people readily understand. (Chapter 3) __2__ When I am speaking with people of different cultures or of the opposite sex, I am careful to monitor my word choices. (Chapter 3) __4__ I tend to look at people when I talk with them. (Chapter 4) __2__ Most of my sentences are free from such expressions as “uh,” “well,” “like,” and “you know.” (Chapter 4) __4__ I consider the effect of my dress on others. (Chapter 4) __3__ I try to make sure that my nonverbal messages match my verbal messages. (Chapter 4) __3__ I listen attentively, regardless of my interest in the person or the ideas. (Chapter......

Words: 334 - Pages: 2