Premium Essay

The Right to Live

In: Social Issues

Submitted By heavendimas
Words 1172
Pages 5
Often in society when one hears the term “abortion” many think of murder. Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy by removing or expelling a fetus or embryo from the uterus. (WebMD) Abortion remains a controversial topic due to the fact that it is frequently of occurrence. Pro-life groups argue that a human fetus has a right to live, so abortion is murder. Pro-choice groups argue that a woman has the choice of whether or not to carry a child. More than half of six million pregnancies a year in the United States are considered unplanned. Half of these unplanned pregnancies result in abortion. Abortion should not be looked upon as a sin, or murder, but rather as a medical procedure that could give a woman a better, and even safer choice. Shaming a woman for seeking an abortion is heinous, especially if the pregnancy could be harmful to the mother’s heath. Religion is not something that should decide whether or not a woman has a right to do what she feels is best for her own body. The most common reason why some women seek an abortion is because they are young. (Why Women Choose Abortion) Many women who give birth as teens never finish high school, and do not have the necessities to raise a child such as; financial stability. Although I agree that abortion should not be used as a contraceptive method, I also believe that every child deserves a good home. If a mother herself is still growing up, and does not feel suitable to raise a child for the next eighteen years then that is her right to make the choice to not start something she cannot finish. Abortions also happen because of social pressure. When a specific gender is preferred, or when governments enforce population control, women often have to resort to unsafe practices. Countries that are strict in abortive laws have more women who confide in unsafe abortions. Women who have been raped, or are

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Civil Rights Movement: The Black Lives Matter Movement

...Martin at the hands of neighborhood watch captain George Zimmerman in 2012. The Black Lives Matter Movement is an ideological and political mediation in a reality where we bear witness to black lives who are deliberately and purposefully targeted for death. The Black Lives Matter Movement has developed into the biggest black driven crusade since the 1960s. While particular objectives and strategies for the movement shift by city and state, generally speaking the development tries to focus on...

Words: 981 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Summary Of Live Right And Find Happiness By Dave Barry

...Don't try to be a know it all, because someday when people make a smart remark to someone else it will come back and bite them in the butt. “Live Right and Find Happiness” by Dave Barry is a high comedic essay that uses hyperbole and irony to teach his grandson about life, and what to do and not to do. First off, Barry uses irony to tell his grandson, Dylan, not to do something unless it is done to him first. For example, when Barry says, “Don’t be a jerk, Dylan. Be nice to everyone. If somebody turns out to be a jerk, you can stop being nice to that person. But always start with nice… Don't bully, and don't hit people, unless they are bullying you, in which case go ahead and belt them.” (Barry). The intended effect for this quote would be...

Words: 359 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Black Civil Rights Movement: The Black Lives Matter Movement

...The Black Lives Matter movement was a movement that was created in 2012 after the shooting of Trayvon Martin in Florida by a man named George Zimmerman. However, after pleading innocence, he was released. His reasoning behind the shooting was that it was done for self-defense. This caused for an outrage amongst the African-American community all over the nation and caused for the creation of the Black Lives Matter, or BLM movement for short. Now, the intentions of the BLM movement are to resist dehumanization and fight against violence and systematic racism toward black people. They fight to secure the rights that black people are denied in society which a person of another color normally has. According to their official site, the BLM movement, “…centers those that have been marginalized within Black liberation movements.” They do so mainly by protesting, and at other times, joining other civil rights groups. For instance, recently, BLM joined forces with the minimum...

Words: 495 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Live in Relationship

...LIVE IN RELATIONSHIP http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cohabitation_in_India Cohabitation or live-in relationships in India though not illegal, is considered socially and morally improper. Cohabitation is prevalent mostly among the people living in metro cities in India. Legal decisions[edit] Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005 recognises “relationship in the nature of marriage” and protects female partners from domestic violence. Such partners can claim monetary and other reliefs under the Act.[1] In S. Khushboo Vs. Kanniammal & Anr.,[2] the Supreme Court of India, placing reliance upon its earlier decision in Lata Singh Vs. State of U.P. & Anr.,[3] held that live-in-relationship is permissible only in unmarried major persons of heterogeneous sex. The Supreme Court on 13 August 2010 in the case of Madan Mohan Singh & Ors v. Rajni Kant & Anr. [4] has once again entered the debate on legality of the Live-in Relationship as well as legitimacy of Child born out of such relationship. The Court while dismissing the appeal in the property dispute held that there is a presumption of marriage between those who are in live-in relationship for a long time and this cannot be termed as 'walking-in and walking-out' relationship. In the case of Bharata Matha & Ors v. R. Vijaya Renganathan & Ors. [5]dealing with the legitimacy of child born out of a live-in relationship and his succession of property rights, the Supreme Court held that child born out...

Words: 16635 - Pages: 67

Premium Essay

Cyrus The Great Equality

...Why Human Rights are Essential The first documented instance of Human Rights was by Cyrus the Great in 539 BCE. Cyrus the Great was an ancient ruler of Persia who freed the slaves of Babylon after defeating them. This was the first known documented instance of human rights. Cyrus’ actions were a model for many later historians. Human Rights have been in existence since ancient times and belong to every human regardless of class, race, or status. Human Rights are standards that allow people to live with, dignity, freedom, equality and peace. These rights are necessary to a functioning society. They are important because they give us the ability to live in equality with one another as humans and live in peace. Human Rights also provide peace and justice in a struggling society and enables us to be clearly entitled to basic necessities as humans....

Words: 710 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Animal Rights

...Animal Rights Animal Rights Johana Diaz Professor Irene Silas April 2011 Animal Rights Animal Rights Like humans, animals feel emotions such as pain, anxiety, and affection then if humans have rights, animals should also have rights. It is true that animals are different from people but it doesn't mean that they are inferior to them. Animals are abused and killed for a variety of socially acceptable purposes: 6 billion are slaughtered as foods, 200 million are murdered by sport hunters, 50 million die in laboratories and 25 million are murdered for their fur. Numbers never lie, cruelty towards animals is a fact. It is important to let humanity know why animals should have rights. Informing on the physical and psychological abuse that they suffer through violence, research of educational and scientific purposes and for the entertainment of people. Animal Rights, also known as Animal Liberation, is the the idea that the most basic interests in animals should be allowed the same amount of attention as basic interests in human beings (Wise, 2007). Peter Singer, a philosopher with a sensible focus on suffering in animals, incites people to extend their moral care boundaries to include animals. He says that animals shouldn't be discriminate against because they are not part of the human species (Yount, 2008).I agree completely with that just because animals don't have the same rationality as human...

Words: 1560 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Six Theories of Justice

...Philosophical Views of Justice We hold these truths to be self–evident, That all men are created equal, That they are endowed by their Creator With certain unalienable Rights, That among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.– That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, Deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. In today’s society, people have choices. They have the choice to believe in whomsoever they wish and live their lives according to their own morals and values. People, as stated in the above excerpt of the Declaration of Independence, have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. There are three main philosophical views on justice that drive our lives; they are Utilitarianism, Social Contract Theory and Entitlement Theory. These theories have some similar aspects as well as differences which set them apart. Each person must choose the view that best fits them and live their lives accordingly. The theory of Utilitarianism was brought forth from the minds of Jeremy Bentham, James Mill, John Stuart Mill, Henry Sidgwick and G.E. Moore. Although it is one of the older theories, its attributes are still seen today in market economies and “cost-benefit analysis”. It is a simple theory which relies on few principles; the great happiness principle states that actions are just as long as they promote happiness, not only in ourselves but in others as well. This presents two principles for consideration:...

Words: 1235 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Ethical and Moral Decisions

...is defined as the judgment of behavior as right or wrong. It is hard to live up to the standards of your peers and the standards of your professional life. Being a criminal justice professional can sometimes cause a person to live two different lives. They have to remain professional while serving the public and making the decisions that affect people’s lives forever. They also have to live their personal lives and though we want to, we can’t control our family and friends, For example, a police officer Is not going to take his uncle to jail because he had a couple of beers at the family function and now wants to drive home. He may beg him to stay, but if he leaves will he jump in his squad car and chase him down the street? That is how discretion works. Things like that happen in everyday life. How can we truly know that the laws are being upheld and everyone is treated fairly with criminal justice professionals having the authority to decide who to punish and who not to punish? Legislators have the power to define behavior as illegal and therefor punishable. They also have the power to set the amount of punishment. Police officers enforce the laws created by legislators. Prosecutors decide who and how to prosecute. Judges possess power to deny or accept plea bargains, make decisions regarding rules of evidence, and decisions about sentencing. Correctional professionals have a great deal of discretion over the lives of those they control. Criminal Justice professionals...

Words: 569 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

What Is Happiness?

...people. These people possess power, fame, and money. If those things do not provide happiness, then what does? Also, there are the people like Ghandi and Jesus who had very little or nothing and still were happy. They had inner peace and happiness that led them to become moral figures for the people of our generation. These people who had almost nothing somehow possessed happiness. This brings about questions like, “What is happiness?” and, “What do people need to do in order to be happy?” I believe in order to possess happiness one needs to live a life in accordance with virtue; a life that Aristotle said would lead to happiness. In this essay I will state and talk about some different views of happiness and moral goodness. I will also summarize my true opinion of what happiness is and what way of life I believe one should live. First, Hedonism or the Principle of Utility, a philosophy that Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill live according to, says that pleasure is good and will lead to happiness. They believe that if you avoid pain and maximize pleasure that you will gain happiness. The Greatest Happiness principle states that one should approve or disapprove of an action based on the amount of pain and pleasure brought about for all people affected by the action. One should consider the consequences and consider the alternatives before deciding that the action will create the greatest happiness for everyone involved. Bentham did not differentiate the different pleasures...

Words: 1213 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

File

...Summary “Privacy is something cherished by almost all Americans. It is the right to live life without the government prying into what we done right to be let alone. Privacy allows us to develop into individuals with our own thoughts, beliefs, hopes, and dreams. It permits us to decide how to live our lives in our own homes. Privacy allows adults to decide who to marry, whether to have children, and how to raise a family. The right to privacy restricts how the government can investigate our lives.” – Ellen Alderman Today, when voyeurs, marketers, and the curious are invading so many aspects of what has traditionally been considered the individual's inviolate personal domain, this book is a God- send in helping us understand what it is we have with the right to privacy, and also in helping us to focus on what is so much at risk. While the word "privacy" appears nowhere in our Constitution, a majority of Americans fervently believe that their right to privacy is a key element which is central to the way they live their public and personal lives, and that it is also key to the viability of the democratic system. Given the fact that it is a somewhat abstract, ambiguous, and difficult idea to define, privacy is indeed seen as being a critical and irreplaceable basic right of individuals. For example, the freedoms of expression and religion in the First Amendment protect the right to have private thoughts and ideas. The Fourth Amendment says the government...

Words: 2131 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

In a Business Enviornment, Why Should People Be Moral as Individuals?

...Businesses immorality not only affected those employees but the lives of their families, as well as all those whom connected to the company. One will never know the extent of damage caused by immoral acts; the repercussions are too far reaching. In a business environment, a business should be more conscious of acting morally correct than any individual, because the number of live affected are incalculable. In a business environment, why should people be moral as individuals? Introduction Businesses should be morally responsible because the damage they can do is monumental. Businesses that do not act morally destroy lives; while these individual may not die their lives are irrevocably changed. For example, the collapse of a factory in Bangladesh in 2013 killed eleven-hundred people. This collapse was entirely preventable; had the owner not violated building codes and failed to respond appropriately to information that the building was not safe, the accident would not have happened. (Fortune, 2013) Furthermore, this businesses immorality not only affected those employees that died but the lives of their families, as well as all those whom witnessed the event. One will never know the extent of damage caused by immoral acts such as this one; the repercussions are too far reaching. In a business environment, a business should be more conscious of acting morally correct than any individual, because the number of live affected are incalculable. Deontological Ethics Deontological...

Words: 1085 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

How Far Do You Agree That the Impact of the Second World War Was the Main Reason Why the Position of African Americans Improved in the Years 1945

...in improving the lives of black Americans over the years 1945-55, as it led to federal support of the cause. However, it wasn’t as important as the use of direct action which, for the first time, was able to convert de jure into de facto change. This, not the War, was therefore the most significant factor in the improvement; achieving something which federal support and the work of civil rights organisations which did not engage in direct action were alone unable to do. The impact of the Second World War was influential in improving the lives of Black Americans because it led to increased federal support of the Civil Rights movement. During the Second World War, approximately 1.2 million black joined the United States armed forces. Their experience in the army allowed understanding the extent to which they were being discriminated against. The hypocrisy of the USA was discovered, a country claiming to be fighting a war of freedom yet oppressed ethnic minorities in their own country. Being sent to Europe, where formal segregation did not exist, the soldiers were able to see what could be achieved from desegregation. African Americans were encouraged to. The War brought significant economic changes to the lives of black Americans. Initially munitions factories would not employ African Americans. A.Phillip.Randolf threatened a march on Washington D.C. if the government did not change the employment system, President Truman felt obliged to commit to Civil Rights for Black Americans...

Words: 1438 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Persuasive Essay On Physician Assisted Suicide

...sick and dying should have the legal right to end their life with the help of a physician. There are many terminal cancer patients who are so sick they will not have a chance to live the rest of their life so they choose the route of physician assisted suicide. They choose it because it is an easy pain free way to end their life. Although people may say physician assisted suicide is unethical, physician assisted suicide is ethical because it is a person's individual choice whether they want to live or die and it reduces suffering. There have been many cases and statewide issues that have dealt with physician assisted suicide. The state of California and Washington denied the idea of physician assisted suicide. In the early 1990’s California and Washington rejected the votes that would have allowed Physician assisted suicide to be legal. Physician assisted suicide is a state issue. Physician assisted suicide was a problem in states...

Words: 812 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Why Is Abortion Ethically Wrong

...No matter the person, no matter the cause, they matter. Between the two articles “Abortion” and “The Rights of a Woman Do Not Outweigh the Rights of a Child”, they each give their opinion on abortion, also revealing their side of the matter. Even though much is not given on which side is chosen, the article “Abortion” goes more into explaining the situation and controversy of abortion. Controversy like some people believe that it is alright for women to have abortions because they think that an embryo or fetus is not a human life because it is unborn, which is completely false. The article “The Rights of a Woman Do Not Outweigh the Rights of a Child” is on the side of being against abortion. They talk about how the rights of an unborn baby...

Words: 834 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Plight of Grandparents' Rights

...The Plight of Grandparents’ Rights Being a grandparent is one of the grandest things that will ever happen to a parent. Maybe because it happens to us later in life when we are a little wiser and a little more appreciative of things. Maybe because it is a gift that we really didn’t expect to receive. Whatever the reason, the experience of being a grandparent is one that is precious and should be respected. For seven years I enjoyed watching my twin granddaughters grow up. In fact I lived with them for the first year of their lives and developed a very strong bond with them. Sure our family had it’s moments but for the most part we were close and enjoyed spending time together. Then it happened, our family fell apart. My granddaughters’ parents split up and so did our family. Being the grandparent, I was the last to know that there were issues in my son’s marriage but I was the first one to be cut out of his daughters’ lives. My granddaughters’ mother will not speak to me or allow me to have any contact with them. My son is fighting his own battle to see them. Now I only see them a few hours every month. Needless to say this turn of events has been absolutely devastating for my husband and I. We miss our granddaughters so very much and we feel so confused. Do we have legal rights to see our granddaughters and be a part of their lives? “The state of grandparents’ rights is terrible”, says Richard Kent, from Meyers Breiner & Kent. This is the opening sentence...

Words: 1005 - Pages: 5