Premium Essay

Time and the Soul

In: Business and Management

Submitted By Magleuf
Words 1919
Pages 8
People didn’t have enough time. Yes they did because they have the same 24 hours, the same 1440 minutes. But they didn’t have the skills of managing the time that was available to them.
For some people time management is nothing but common sense. They are doing well at their job so they must be managing their time just fine. Maybe, but it’s more likely that they are successful in spite of their time management practices. Common sense isn’t all that common these days. For some, they work better under pressure; time management would take away the edge. But nobody works better under pressure; what really happens is they do the best they can under the circumstances. Usually this is nothing but a subconscious rationale for procrastinating. If people put off a major task until the last minute, with the excuse that they work better under pressure, they leave themselves no time to do the planning that would produce superior results. Some people use a calendar appointment or a “to-do the list”. The calendar tells where they are today, but doesn’t help much with next month, and it’s almost impossible to retrieve something from the past. The best time management tool is an integrated system, one that allows retrieving information. People take time management too seriously and for them it that takes all the fun out of life. For them it also takes away their freedom. Time management is not fundamentally about routine; it’s about self-discipline. Effective time management gives people time to be creative. It frees their mind of the worry and tedious detail that stand in the way of creative thinking.
Thus, the very notion of time management is a misnomer. For they cannot manage time. They can only manage themselves in relation to time. They cannot choose whether to spend it but only how. Once they’ve wasted time, it’s gone and cannot be replaced.

Time,

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Soul Music Research Paper

...Thesis: This monograph will discuss the origination of Soul Music, its founding fathers, how it was influenced throughout the decades, as well as statistics, research and demographics of it impact on people. To begin with, “soul music is defined as a fervent type of popular music developed in the late 1950s by black Americans as a secularized form of gospel music, with rhythm-and-blues influences, and distinctive for its earthy expressiveness, variously plaintive or raucous vocals, and often passionate romanticism or sensuality” (Kris, "Dictionary.com"). Soul music first takes root during the 1950s, in Memphis, Tennessee, and was originally preformed by African-Americans. The musical composition of soul consists of guitar, bass, piano, organ,...

Words: 2002 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Ethical Soul

...Statement: An Ethical Soul Elisa Gwilliam Concordia University Personal Ethics Statement: An Ethical Soul Life is a journey of experimental learning. Ethics are an important part of our journey, as they help us navigate the point at which our inner being intersects with the world. This paper will examine Palmer, Borgmann, and Willard definitions of the soul and their reflection on the caring of the core ethical self. Finally, it will examine where the soul is being disposed to unethical activities as well as ethical flourishing. Soul Ethics Body, mind and soul. Authors throughout time have pondered the development and relationship amongst the three. What is the soul? Willard (2004) defines the soul as “the hidden or ‘spiritual’ side of the person” (para. 2). Developing the spiritual side of a person, caring for their soul, comes down to one fundamental thing according to Willard, “keeping God before our minds.” To do this we can practice solitude and silence. These practices can be incorporated into our daily lives to care for our soul. During these times of deep reflection a person can rest, observe and disengage from the constant information that is out in the world. According to Willard during these periods of time “we rid ourselves of the ‘corrosion’ of the soul that accrues from constant interaction with others and the world around us.” Referencing Aristotle, Borgmann (2006) defines the soul as “the vital source of a human being” (p.133). The soul is cared for through...

Words: 848 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Dante's Inferno Research Paper

...In Dante’s Inferno, there are nine circles of Hell. But there is this outer layer right before the first circle, where the souls are rejected by both Heaven and Hell. After reading the famous words, “Abandon every hope, all you who enter,” (p.14 line 9) Dante and Virgil enter this lonely land of indecisive souls. To me, this is the worst layer of Hell. There is so many horrid things within this layer of Hell and throughout this paper I will argue why I think this is the worst part of Hell. The opening of Canto III starts with bold-capitalized words on a sign at the gates of Hell. This sign is very dark and as Dante says the words are “cruel.” As Dante and Virgil walk past through the gates they enter the place of the rejected souls. Souls of...

Words: 1141 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

'We Are Basically Physical Beings.' to What Extent Do You Agree?

...ideas on the soul. The main argument I'm using to examine us being 'basically physical beings' is dualism and the connection between the mind, body and the soul. One of the first recorded forms of dualism was platonic dualism. Plato (429-347 BCE) believed that the body was physical and is rooted in the four dimensions of space and time which is subject to change, he called this the 'sarx'. But a 'being' also had another part, a soul, which existed in the world of forms and was made up of three distinct elements; reason, emotion and appetite. These three instincts in Plato’s view are what animates us. This therefore makes us not just physical beings. Plato though, saw the soul as pure or 'simple' and therefore the body was inferior something which trapped the soul until death. Plato appears to believe that the soul will be reborn in a new body after that. Aristotle (384-322 BCE) at the time also agreed that we had a 'soul'. But he believed that the body and soul were inseparable, this is the earlier monist ideas. Due to the soul and body not being able to separate this mean that the idea did not allow the soul to survive death. Aristotle did rethink this at times wondering if we did have non-physical elements to us, but it's not likely since he believed people couldn't live after death in any sense. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274 CE) was one of the first to integrate dualism into Christianity. Aquinas mainly followed Aristotle's view and believed that the body and soul were inseparable...

Words: 1123 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Here Is an Extra Life for You.

...Adnan Ahmad Compare and contrast Aristotle‘s concept of mind with that of Descartes.   Introduction In this essay I attempt to show Aristotle’s concept of soul/mind*[1]. Then I compare and contrast it with Descartes’ concept of mind. In order to understand Aristotle’s concepts of mind, I shall consider Aristotle’s De Anima, in which Aristotle mostly concentrates on soul/mind discussion. I will examine the work of Kahn and Sorabji, who both considered Aristotle’s and Descartes’ philosophy in relation to soul and body problem. In order to compare Aristotle’s concept of mind with Descartes’, I am going to introduce Descartes’ most famous philosophical work which involves the question of mind directly, namely hisMeditations. ………………………….                        ……………………………                          ………………………………. If we look at Aristotle’s De Anima we can understand that pre-Aristotle thinkers were already concerned with corporeal and incorporeal problems. For example, for Plato soul was an ‘incorporeal’ and immortal thing, but body corporeal and mortal. The first impression we get from reading De Anima is that the mind and body problem was unsolved. Perhaps the resolved problem didn’t satisfy Aristotle. Aristotle claims that an incorporeal thing cannot exist without a corporeal thing.  Aristotle’s new theory for solving soul and body problems makes controversial debate among most post-Aristotelian philosophers. Rene Descartes was one of them who rejected the Aristotelian concept...

Words: 3631 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Fghfv 7frftu Ig Fgcytfuj

...Richard Dawkins’ views on body and soul identity. (35) The mind-body problem is an ongoing problem in the philosophy concerning the nature of the relationship between the mind, or consciousness, and the physical world. It questions how our mental thoughts are linked to our physical activities. In religion and philosophy, the soul is considered the immaterial aspect or essence of a human being, which is often considered to be synonymous with the mind or the self. In theology, the soul is further defined as that part of the individual which is thought to survive the death of the body. However, this view point isn’t taken by all. Viewpoints on the soul can be separated into monism, dualism and materialistic views. Aristotle is a monist believing that the body and soul are not linked, whereas Dawkins is a hard materialist believing that biology is the key. Aristotle defined the soul, or psyche, as the ‘first actuality’ of the body and argued against it having a separate existence from the physical body, unlike other philosophers such as Plato. Aristotle’s belief was that the difference between a live body and a corpse is the presence of the soul. When the soul dies, so does the body. In his book, De Anima he stated that “the soul does not exist without a body and yet is not itself a kind of body. For it is not a body, but something which belongs to a body.” In Aristotle’s view, full actualisation of a living thing is its soul. The soul is the form and shape of the body...

Words: 1420 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Plato’s Argument for Three Parts of the Soul

...Introduction Plato argues that the soul comprises of three parts namely rational, appetitive, and the spirited. These parts also match up the three ranks of a just community. Personal justice involves maintaining the three parts in the proper balance, where reason rules while appetite obeys. According to Plato, the appetitive part of the soul is the one that is accountable for the desires in people. It is accountable for the effortless cravings required to stay alive like hunger, thirst, and for pointless cravings like desire to over feed. The desires for essential things should be limited by other sections of the soul, while illegitimate desires ought to be limited entirely by other elements of soul. The rational soul on the other hand is the thinking element in every human being, which decided what is factual and merely obvious, judges what is factual and what is untrue, and intelligently makes sensible decisions. Finally, the spirited soul produces the desires that love victory and honor. In the just soul, the spirit acts as an implementer of the rational soul, making sure that the rules of reason are adhered to. Emotions like indignation and anger are the impact of the disappointment of the spirit. Someone might respond to the claim that the soul comprises of three parts. Argument Plato argued that a community has three parts which are guardians, producers, and soldiers and each part performs a particular function. For a community to be just, every element has...

Words: 828 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Plato and Ethics

...of the Soul which states that every human soul is made up of three parts: the appetitive, the spirited, and the rational. To begin, the appetitive part of the soul desires food, drink, sex, and other carnal pleasures. Next, the spirited part of an individual’s soul reveals ambition or anger and desires honor and victory. Lastly, the rational part of the soul weighs options, and tries to gauge what is best and truest overall in every circumstance. Plato first maintains that there is evidence of divisions of the soul in Socrates argument, “For we hold it impossible that the same thing should, at the same time, with the same part of itself, in reference to the same object, be doing two opposite things” (439b). In other words, a soul is made of different parts by evidence of its opposing attitudes or conflicts within itself. Socrates then goes on to speak of a conflict within a person who is thirsty but does not drink. Socrates states, “…their soul contains one principle which commands, and another which forbids them to drink, the latter being distinct from and stronger than the former” (439c). In this text, Socrates has distinguished between the appetitive and rational parts of the soul. Furthermore, Socrates illustrates how the rational part is capable of controlling the part of the soul that “…loves and hungers and thirsts, and experiences the flutter of the other desires…” (439d). Next, Socrates speaks on the conflict between the spirited and appetitive parts of the soul. Socrates...

Words: 625 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Socrates Body and Soul

...integrates empiricism and rationalism. Empiricism implies that knowledge is gained through experiential insight, while the rationalism assumes that knowledge is gained through one’s practical understanding. During the early Greek times, the vast majority of the Greek philosophies and theories were composed of empiricism and rationalism. Questions that relate to human existence; mind and body, as we will see, were developed on the assumption that knowledge comes from experience. Some theories were so powerful that they have been moulded and manipulated to fit into the faculty of various religious beliefs and practices. The contributions of Socrates (500 BC) still remain to this day, and are studied in great depth such as the “Republic of Plato” which was written by Plato. Socrates, one of the world’s most influential philosophers, who was seemingly ahead of his time, shaped elegant theories which illuminated many of the puzzling aspects regarding life and death – body and soul. In the following narrative, we will describe the main differences, properties, and functions between the body and the soul, according to Socrates. Accompanying will be an explanation of what Socrates sought to be the underlying characteristics interacting within the body and soul. The ways in which Socrates describes the characteristics is what makes him so fundamentally different from any other philosopher. The following information is based on an exceptional piece of literature titled, “Phaedo” which was...

Words: 1126 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Lucretius on Mortality

...unknown by noting that there is no definitive evidence to prove the existence of such a postmortem experience. According to Lucretius, this fundamental fear of death is completely speculative, and wholly illogical; he argues that we have no reason to fear death because there is nothing after death. What makes Lucretius’ argument so significant, is not how he counters religion, but how he bases it upon his own revision of atomism. It is because of this foundation of logical thought that Lucretius’ writing on the nature of death can still be thought of as a sound hypothesis. Although atomism certainly was not a new philosophy by the time Lucretius wrote, or even by the time of Rome’s ascension to power, the original propositions regarding the nature of matter were not enough to construct a philosophy similar to that presented by Lucretius. Over time, atomism had evolved from a binary view that the world consisted solely of atoms and void, to a more comprehensive and varied picture. According to Leucippean and Democritean atomism,...

Words: 1147 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Twin Flames In The Mayaan Myth

...Because of the times we live in, there is much interest today in the Mayan Calendar, 11:11, and twin flames. Many souls on earth are having the delightful and challenging experience of meeting their twin flame. At the time of creation, the souls split into two distinct and separate souls, thereby enjoying more opportunity to learn and grow while incarnating on earth and other life realms. This created a great opportunity to learn and grow, but at the same time has created much conflict and a need to reunite with one's "other Half". Many have been looking for many years and gone through failed relationships seeking to reconnect with their true twin soul. The number eleven has long been considered a highly spiritual number. It is often referred to as a master number, but master of what? I believe one of the events the number eleven signifies is the twin flame....

Words: 414 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Starbucks

...SOUL WINNING Soul Winning is God's Plan to Bring Lost Sinners to Christ for Salvation The term “soul-winning” simply refers to the practice of trying to lead lost sinners to the Lord Jesus Christ for salvation. Surely, I nor you can save anybody—Only Jesus Christ can save!!! However, God Almighty has entrusted the job of soul-winning to ALL HIS DISCIPLES. If you are a saved, born-again Believer, then you are COMMANDED to be a soul-winner. Listen to the clear teaching of Jesus Christ Himself in Matthew 28:19 and 20, “Go ye therefore, and TEACH ALL NATIONS, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: TEACHING THEM to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and, lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen.” It is our duty as Children of God to “teach them.” Teach who? We are to teach the Gospel of Christ to lost sinners. We are to teach those whom we lead to Christ how to win others to Christ. We are we supposed to teach them. What do we teach them? “...to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you.” It was the responsibility of the disciples in Jesus’ day to teach the Gospel to all nations (all people). If someone became a Believer, accepting Jesus Christ as Almighty God and Savior, then the disciples were to help that new convert grow in the Lord and become a soul-winner also. This is God’s divine plan to win the lost to Christ—We are responsible!!! I am sickened when I hear some dead-beat...

Words: 1499 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Soul

...PHL 210: Introduction to Philosophy Final Project: Is there such a thing as a Soul? 6/5/2014 The topic that I have chosen for my essay is, Is there such a thing as a “Soul”? Is the soul something different from the brain? Does the soul survive after our physical death? There has been much speculation on if humans truly do have a soul, if the soul is the same as our brain, what happens after we die?  Does our soul continue on to become something else in an afterlife? What do different religions believe happen in the afterlife? Do we stay the same just without our physical body, or is it really the end?  The definition of a soul as defined in the Merriam Webster dictionary is ("Soul," 2014): 1. The spiritual part of a person that is believed to give life to the body and in many religions is believed to live forever 2. A person's deeply felt moral and emotional nature 3. The ability of a person to feel kindness and sympathy for others, to appreciate beauty and art, etc. When thinking of the difference between the brain and the soul. The soul is one nonphysical dimension of a person. A human person is a spiritual entity that has an involvement with a particular physical body. The brain is an essential organ that is of more than usual interest and is one part of the embodied dimension of the human body (Willard, 2002). There are many variations as to what occurs when our life comes to an end. In each religion there is some form of afterlife, some of these ideas...

Words: 1046 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Socrates Third Part Of The Soul Essay

...The third part of the soul, contrary to the other two parts (the calculation and the appetitive part of the souls), Socrates carries out the desires that reason orders. Socrates, then, attempts to show that spirit cannot be the object of reason because it sometimes acts when reason is non-apparent. For example, he says “for that much one can see in children, that they are from their very birth chock-full of rage and high spirit, but as for reason, some of them… never participate in it...” – he states that children have desires of the third part without the reasoning part of the soul (AGP, 477, 441A,B). Because of his argument and example, Socrates shows that the third part is not the same as the rational part of the soul; the third part of...

Words: 657 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Aristotle and the Soul

...Aristotle and the Soul Versus Health Care Ashley Pagan Introduction to Philosophy Dr. J May 26, 2012 Aristotle and the Soul Versus Health Care While Aristotle did not believe in a supernatural Creator or God, he did believe in the human soul. However, Aristotle’s beliefs concerning the human soul differed from the thoughts of those of Plato under whom he studied. Aristotle believed that the soul or “ultimate purpose” describes one’s unique purpose within the natural order (Chaffee, 2011). Unlike Plato, Aristotle’s views concerning the soul were in no way supernatural. He believed that everything consisted of matter and form. Matter was the stuff that makes up the material universes and form refers to the essence that makes things what they are (Chaffee, 2011). Taken together it is matter and form creates formed matter or substance and requires each other in order to exist. With that being said Aristotle believed that the soul was the formal element of the body, giving it shape and purposeful direction (Chaffee, 2011). Along with his theory of the existence of the soul, Aristotle also hypothesized the contents and necessary conditions of the soul. He argued that there are natural bodies, some are living and others are not. In his argument Aristotle calls attention to the fact that whatever has a soul, in the human sense, displays life. Aristotle believed that a besouled natural body could grow, decay and at the same time provide itself with nutrition; the soul is further characterized...

Words: 732 - Pages: 3