Premium Essay

To What Extent Does Executive Pay Influence Company Performance?

In: Business and Management

Submitted By carrie507
Words 655
Pages 3
There has been widespread controversy in recent years about the amount of compensation
CEO’s receive. CEO’s financial compensation packages were largely structured to incentivize risk taking in order to increase shareholder wealth (“Restraints on Executive Pay”, 2009). Yet, the 2008 financial crisis was mostly characterized by declining levels of company performance largely due to the increase of risk afforded to CEO’s by the attractiveness of lucrative executive incentives to perform. This essay argues that executive pay and its influence on company performance is both controversial and complex and concludes that executive pay has minimal influence on company performance and, when it does have influence, it tends to be negative.
It is widely believed that companies and their shareholders suffer from poor performance unless the importance of incentives for executives – most notably through monetary and stock compensation – is realized (Jensen and Murphy 1990). The notion that the level and performance sensitivity of pay affects the quality of managers an organization can attract in a competitive labor market for executives seems, on the surface, uncontroversial. However, whether compensation policy is truly “one of the most important factors in an organization’s success” (p.139), as Jensen and Murphy (1990) assert needs further examination
A series of empirical studies from a variety of industry, national, and time settings present evidence contrary to the conventional belief in the effectiveness of performance‐related pay. In a paper exploring the effect of executive compensation policy on the profitability of companies in Japan in 1993‐
1995, Kubo (1995) found very weak linkage between the pay‐performance sensitivity of a company’s compensation policy and its return on capital, prompting the researcher to conclude that “firms with
highly…...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

To What Extent Does Executive Pay Influence Company Performance?

...4 million, which was 475 times the blue-collar wage. This phenomenon revealed that companies are putting increasing emphasis on the CEO’s pay packages, holding a belief that better company performance could be achieved from a higher pay packages for executives. In other words, the correlation between executive pay and company’s performance has been underlined by many corporate boards in recent years. With the skyrocketed executive pay in society, there has been an avalanche of debates over the strong bonding between executive pay and company’s performance, especially among shareholders of the companies who doubted if it is worthwhile to invest a significant amount of money on the executive pay package. In fact, despite the fact that executives has been justifying their pay packages with such correlation, still, I agree to a small extent that executive pay does influence company performance. There is no denying that monetary rewards could be translated to motivation for executives to contribute more and to strive for a more lucrative profit for the company. However, there is no guarantee that a higher remuneration for executives would give rise to a more outstanding company performance given that executive pay is not the only key to success for a company. As a matter of fact, there are a wide range of external determinants affecting companies’ performance that cannot be controlled by executives, with opportunities and threats being the most significant one. It would be......

Words: 786 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

To What Extent Does Executive Pay Influence Company Performance

...argument discussing about the impact of executive pay influence over company performance. It is often taken for granted that a company is able to have a better performance when the C-Suite is paid more. Nevertheless, the issue can be unexpectedly complicated in some cases and go way beyond a “more or less” question. Several empirical evidences reveal that an unwise form of payment could easily backfire and lead the company to be derailed, even if the compensation is appear to be highly tempting. In this article, based on the current pay system, the correlation between executive compensation and company performance will be studied, suggesting that although the two subjects are positively correlated from a theoretical perspective, restraints and loopholes indeed exist in the current context of economy. 2 The Current Pay System In the beginning of 1990s, a high level of executive compensation has already been regarded as an effective measure to solve the principal-agent problem within a company, that is, to align the benefit of shareholders and executive managers. It’s believed that the rise in executive pay serves as strong incentives, and conceivably, it could be stronger with a larger sum of money (Jenson, M and Murphy, K). Derived from the previous viewpoints and experiences alike, the current executive compensation usually comprises base salary, performance-based bonus and long-term incentives. The system is supposed to furnish executives not only with a large amount of......

Words: 568 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

To What Extent Does Executive Pay Influence Company's Performance

...Executive pay is often perceived by large as an excess of company compensation. But does it generally provide better results? It is evident that executive pay plays a role in a company’s performance, however the extent of its influence depends on the company’s policy on executive pay. In the essay I will examine how executive pay is dependent on company performance and whether this will affect future company development. The most basic concept is that the amount that executives are paid has a definite effect on performance. If an executive is paid a enormous amount of compensation, he is likely to be overconfident of his business decisions and is likely to take higher risks. This is due to his past performance that led to such high compensation. With such high compensation under the public eye, executives would feel compelled to perform better to live up to his expectations. But firstly, we have to determine if executive pay is performance based. The idealistic policy is to reward executives when they have made positive business decisions and have brought in profit for both the company and shareholders, all the while giving executives incentives to perform better in the next quarter. Some policies are equity-based, meaning bonus’ will link to share prices. This policy will undoubtedly benefit shareholders, because executives will be willing to take bigger risks to drive up the share price. Another reason they would take high risks is because whether the outcome is positive...

Words: 648 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Executive Pay and Company Performance

...To what extent does executive pay influence company performance Executive pay has a lot to do with company performance. Chief executives, as the leader of a company, can exert some impact on the company’s future. Normally, they get a large amount of payment as well as the severance pay. Except the base salaries, they often get a compensation which is several times of their remuneration. According to CNBC, the average S&P 500 company CEO made 373 times the salary of the average production and non-supervisory worker in 2014, up from 331 times in 2013, according to the AFL-CIO. I would argue that executive pay will effect company performance a lot economically and socially. That kind of high payment could become a motivation for both executives and employees. Just as mentioned by Kubo (2005), in order to get as much pay as executives, employees are more willing to work hard and this is beneficial to the performance of the whole firm. He also showed the evidence from Jensen and Murphy that a high pay-performance sensitivity is better for the company. This means, driven by this kind of system, executives need to pay more attention and put more effort on their daily management, since the payment and the performance are related. Moreover, affected by the sense of equity, executives will see to improve the firm profitability (Fong, 2010). Talented individuals will be attracted to companies which are willing to pay more. And this would make the company more competitive than......

Words: 554 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

To What Extent Do You Think Executive Payment Influence Company's Performance

...To what extent does executive pay influence company performance? Whether there is a relationship between the level of executive pay and company performance is a topic of great interest. The forms of executive pay can be both equity-based compensation which is based on the price of company’s stocks, like stocks and options, and non-equity-based compensation, such as cash compensation- including salary and bonus (Bebchuk & Fried, 2006 ). A company’s performance can be measured by its economic return, in other words, the accounting performance on financial statement (Gulen & Rau, 2009). This essay supports that executive pay may have no significant influence on company performance, because there are some ways that managers can decouple their payments from performance, and this essay will investigate these possible underlying reasons. There are studies examine the relationship between the pay policy and performance, and the results do not support the hypothesis that there is significant link between payment and performance. Kubo (2005) examined this link by investigate a group of Japanese companies and the result showed that companies with high pay-performance sensitivity did not get better performance. Gulen and Rau’s (2009) study on incentive pay also suggested that managerial compensation components such as restricted stock, options and long-term incentive payouts, that are meant to align managerial interests with shareholder value, do not necessarily translate......

Words: 827 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Business

...To what extent does executive pay influence company performance? There has been widespread controversy in recent years about the amount of compensation CEO’s receive. CEO’s financial compensation packages were largely structured to incentivize risk taking in order to increase shareholder wealth (“Restraints on Executive Pay”, 2009). Yet, the 2008 financial crisis was mostly characterized by declining levels of company performance largely due to the increase of risk afforded to CEO’s by the attractiveness of lucrative executive incentives to perform. This essay argues that executive pay and its influence on company performance is both controversial and complex and concludes that executive pay has minimal influence on company performance and, when it does have influence, it tends to be negative. It is widely believed that companies and their shareholders suffer from poor performance unless the importance of incentives for executives – most notably through monetary and stock compensation – is realized (Jensen and Murphy 1990). The notion that the level and performance sensitivity of pay affects the quality of managers an organization can attract in a competitive labor market for executives seems, on the surface, uncontroversial. However, whether compensation policy is truly “one of the most important factors in an organization’s success” (p.139), as Jensen and Murphy (1990) assert needs further examination A series of empirical studies from a variety of industry, national...

Words: 809 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Motivation Theories

...Taylor & Francis G K Compensation, esteem valence and job performance: an empirical assessment of Alderfer's ERG theory CA. Arnolds and Christo Boshoff Abstract Improving the job perfomiance of employees has been the focus of many motivation theories, especially the need theories. These theories have however been questioned because of a lack of research on the causal relationship between need satisfaction and job perfonnance. Research on the link between the need satisfaction-job performance relationship and individual personality differences among people has also been neglected. This study addresses these research gaps as far as the intervening influence of personality variables on the need satisfaction-job performance relationship is concemed. The present study investigates the influence of need satisfaction (as suggested by the Alderfer theory) on self-esteem (the personality trait) and the influence of self-esteem on perfonnance intention (the surrogate measure for job performance) of top managers and frontline employees. The empirical results show that esteem as a personality variable exerts a significant influence on the job performance of both top managers and frontline employees. These and other findings provide important guidelines for managers on how to address the motivational needs of top managers and frontline employees in order to improve their job performance. Keywords Job performance; esteem valence; existence needs; relatedness......

Words: 5445 - Pages: 22

Premium Essay

Aaabbccdd

...Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 17, Number 3—Summer 2003—Pages 71–92 Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem Lucian Arye Bebchuk and Jesse M. Fried E xecutive compensation has long attracted a great deal of attention from financial economists. Indeed, the increase in academic papers on the subject of CEO compensation during the 1990s seems to have outpaced even the remarkable increase in CEO pay itself during this period (Murphy, 1999). Much research has focused on how executive compensation schemes can help alleviate the agency problem in publicly traded companies. To understand adequately the landscape of executive compensation, however, one must recognize that the design of compensation arrangements is also partly a product of this same agency problem. Alternative Approaches to Executive Compensation Our focus in this paper is on publicly traded companies without a controlling shareholder. When ownership and management are separated in this way, managers might have substantial power. This recognition goes back, of course, to Berle and Means (1932, p. 139) who observed that top corporate executives, “while in office, have almost complete discretion in management.” Since Jensen and Meckling (1976), the problem of managerial power and discretion has been analyzed in modern finance as an “agency problem.” Managers may use their discretion to benefit themselves personally in a variety y Lucian Arye Bebchuk is the William J. Friedman......

Words: 17317 - Pages: 70

Premium Essay

Performance Appraisal

...A PROJECT REPORT ON “EMPLOYEE’S PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL” FOR ANIL INDUSTRIES KATNI PVT. LTD. SUBMITTED TO MODY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE SUBMITTED BY VISHAKHA KEWLANI (BATCH – 2011-2014) GUIDED BY DR. AJAY VERMA DECLARATION I, the under signed, hereby declare that the project report entitled “Performance Appraisal” is a research work made for Anil Industries Katni Pvt. Ltd. is genuine and benefited work presented by me under the guidance of Dr.. The empirical findings in this project report are based on the data collected by me. The matter presented in this report is not copied from any source. I understand that any such copy is liable to the punishment in way the university authority deems fit. The project Report is submitted to Mody Institute of Technology and Science, in the partial fulfillment of the Bachelor’s Degree course in Business Administration. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My training at Anil Industries Katni Pvt., Ltd. was a great experience to gain the knowledge one could acquire about Human Resource. The practical knowledge that I have gained during this training period has helped me tremendously to improve my knowledge about Performance appraisal system. I am extremely thanked to Mr. Ishwar Kewlani (Manager, HR.) who gave me an opportunity to work in such a highly esteemed organization. I would like to express my deep sense of gratitude to Mr. Sandeep Kewlani for his inspiring guidance, constant......

Words: 5850 - Pages: 24

Free Essay

Compensation Management

...characteristics of executive compensation and its determinants; l understand the principles and practices of compensation administration; and l identify the major components of wage structure in India. Structure 17.1 Introduction 17.2 Compensation Issues 17.3 Compensation Function 17.4 Compensation Policies and Objectives 17.5 Compensation Administration 17.6 Compensation Determinants 17.7 Compensation Survey 17.8 Compensation Structure 17.9 Job Evaluation System 17.10 Pay Equity 17.11 Executive Compensation 17.12 Compensation Trends 17.13 Wage Structure in India 17.14 Case Study 17.15 Summary 17.16 Self-Assessment Questions 17.17 Further Readings 17.1 22 INTRODUCTION One of the most difficult functions of human resource management is that of determining the rates of monetary compensation. It is not only complex, but significant both to the organisation and employees. Employee compensation decisions are crucial for the success of an organisation. From a cost perspective alone, effective management of employee compensation is critical because of the total operating costs. Another reason for studying compensation from the organisation’s perspective is to assess its impact on a wide range of employee attitudes and behaviours and, ultimately the effectiveness of the organisation and its units. Compensation may directly influence key outcomes like......

Words: 6295 - Pages: 26

Premium Essay

What’s Wrong with Executive Compensation?

...Journal of Business Ethics (2009) 85:147–156 DOI 10.1007/s10551-008-9934-6 Ó Springer 2008 What’s Wrong with Executive Compensation? Jared D. Harris ABSTRACT. I broadly explore the question by examining several common criticisms of CEO pay through both philosophical and empirical lenses. While some criticisms appear to be unfounded, the analysis shows not only that current compensation practices are problematic both from the standpoint of distributive justice and fairness, but also that incentive pay ultimately exacerbates the very agency problem it is purported to solve. KEY WORDS: executive compensation, distributive justice, pay disparity, incentive alignment Introduction Few academic theories have been adopted as widely as the application of agency theory (Jensen and Meckling, 1976) to the structure of executive pay in modern corporations. After prominent suggestions that the inherent conflict of interest that exists between stockholders and corporate managers – or ‘agency problem’ – could be mitigated through the structure of managerial incentives (e.g., Jensen and Murphy, 1990a), the prevalence and size of stock option grants to senior executives have expanded increasingly and substantially (Hall and Murphy, Jared D. Harris, Assistant Professor teaches both Ethics and Strategy courses in Darden’s MBA program, and a doctoral seminar on corporate governance and ethics. His research centers on the interplay between ethics and strategy, with a particular......

Words: 6653 - Pages: 27

Premium Essay

Pay as Motivator

...yTHE IMPORTANCE OF PAY IN EMPLOYEE MOTIVATION: DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN WHAT PEOPLE SAY AND WHAT THEY DO Sara L. Rynes, Barry Gerhart, and Kathleen A. Minette A majority of human resources professionals appear to believe that employees are likely to overreport the importance of pay in employee surveys. However, research suggests the opposite is actually true. We review evidence showing the discrepancies between what people say and do with respect to pay. We then discuss why pay is likely to be such an important general motivator, as well as a variety of reasons why managers might underestimate its importance. We note that pay is not equally important in all situations or to all individuals, and identify circumstances under which pay is likely to be more (or less) important to employees. We close with recommendations for implementing research findings with respect to pay and suggestions for evaluating pay systems. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. It is easy to overestimate the frequency with which adults actually go to the opera and underestimate the frequency with which they watch TV cartoons on Saturday mornings, based on their self-reports. (Nunnally & Bernstein, 1994, p. 383) Rynes, Colbert, and Brown (2002) presented the following statement to 959 members of the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM): “Surveys that directly ask employees how important pay is to them are likely to overestimate pay’s true importance in actual decisions” (p. 158). If our......

Words: 9177 - Pages: 37

Free Essay

Compensation Notes

...Chapter 1- The Pay Model Compensation: Does it matter? Compensation is one of the most powerful tools organizations have to influence their employees. General Motors (GM), like Chrysler, has, for decades, paid its workers well—too well perhaps for what it received in return. Having labor costs higher than the competition, without corresponding advantages in efficiency, quality, and customer service, does not seem to have served GM or its stakeholders well. On the other hand, Nucor Steel pays its workers very well relative to what other companies inside and outside of the steel industry pay. But Nucor also has much higher productivity than is typical in the steel industry. Wall Street financial services firms and banks used incentive plans that rewarded people for developing “innovative” new financial investment vehicles and for taking risks to earn themselves and their firms a lot of money. Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP), which included restrictions on executive pay designed to discourage executives from taking “unnecessary and exces-sive risks.” In an opinion piece in The Wall Street Journal, entitled “How Business Schools Have Failed Business,” the former director of corporate finance policy at the United States Treasury wrote that “misaligned incentive programs are at the core of what brought our financial system to its knees.” 7 He says that we “should ask how many of the business schools attended by America’s CEOs and directors educate their students about......

Words: 8809 - Pages: 36

Premium Essay

Understanding What Drives Employee Engagement

...Working Today: Understanding What Drives Employee Engagement The 2003 Towers Perrin Talent Report U.S. Report Table of Contents Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................................2 Defining Engagement: What It Looks Like ......................................................................................................................5 Exhibit 1: Defining Engagement ................................................................................................................................5 Exhibit 2: Current Employee Engagement...............................................................................................................6 Exhibit 3: Engagement Across Job Levels .............................................................................................................7 Exhibit 4: Engagement Across Industries...............................................................................................................7 Driving Engagement: What It Takes ................................................................................................................................9 Exhibit 5: Top Drivers of Engagement: How Employees Rate Their Companies Today.................................9 Exhibit 6: Employee Views About Leadership............................................................................................

Words: 13469 - Pages: 54

Premium Essay

Test

... ■ © 2013 The Corporate Executive Board Company. All Rights Reserved. RR4956913SYN  4 The best recruiting leaders play a pivotal role in driving organizational recruiting performance, but most still have a lot of room to improve. Organizations led by the most effective recruiting executives are up to 28% more effective than others. A wide range of performance exists across recruiting executives, and the vast majority still have a lot of opportunity to improve. A WIDE RANGE OF PERFORMANCE EXISTS AMONG RECRUITING EXECUTIVES Impact of Recruiting Executive Performance on Organization’s Recruiting Effectiveness1 Executives with Lowest Versus Highest Levels of Effectiveness in Key Recruiting Behaviors ∆ = 28% ■ ■ 8685 84848383 82828180 7979 79 78 787878 7776 78 767675 757575 757574 7474 7373 74 72727271717171717070 Low-Scoring High-Scoring 2011 2012 696866 6665 6461 Executives Executives 5958 92 53 Range of Recruiting Executive Performance Average Effectiveness Score Across 15 Leadership Behaviors Rated by Recruiters 52 92% Average Score 74% 52% Recruiting Executives © 2013 The Corporate Executive Board Company. All Rights Reserved. RR4956913SYN 1 Recruiting effectiveness is an organization’s ability to consistently achieve recruiting outcomes related to quality, cost, and time.  5 Recruiting leadership excellence is driven by five key behaviors, in which most leaders fall short. Collaboration, influence, complexity management,......

Words: 4681 - Pages: 19