Premium Essay

Toy Case

In: Business and Management

Submitted By fishsofa
Words 2896
Pages 12
For the exclusive use of A. Lalo
Harvard Business School

9-295-073
Rev. February 23, 1996

Toy World, Inc.
Early in January 1994, Jack McClintock, president and part owner of Toy World, Inc., was considering a proposal to adopt level monthly production for the coming year. In the past, the company’s production schedules had always been highly seasonal, reflecting the seasonality of sales.
Mr. McClintock was aware that a marked improvement in production efficiency could result from level production, but he was uncertain what the impact on other phases of the business might be.
Toy World, Inc. was a manufacturer of plastic toys for children. Its product groups included toy cars, trucks, construction equipment, rockets, spaceships and satellites, musical instruments, animals, robots, and action figures. In most of these product categories the company produced a wide range of designs, colors, and sizes. Dollar sales of a particular product had sometimes varied by
30%-35% from one year to the next.
The manufacture of plastic toys was a highly competitive business. The industry was populated by a large number of companies, many of which were short on capital and management talent. Since capital requirements were not large and the technology was relatively simple, it was easy for new competitors to enter the industry. On the other hand, design and price competition was fierce, resulting in short product lives and a relatively high rate of company failures. A company was sometimes able to steal a march on the competition by designing a popular new toy, often of the fad variety. Such items generally commanded very high margins until competitors were able to offer a similar product. For example, Toy World’s introduction of a line of super hero action figures in 1991 had contributed importantly to that year’s profits. In 1992, however, 11 competitors...

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Gg Toys Case

...Gg Toys Case St G.G.Toys Thedecline margins our popular in on Gtoftry doIIproduct become has intolerable. production Increasing haae costs dropped pretaxmarginto less our than10%, below historical our 257omargins, wearegoing If far to increase margins, need consider our we to drastically shiftingour production towards sfecialtydolts aie that earning large prnniumin priceoaer standard line. a our doll -Robert Parker,President, G.G.Toys Background Robert Parker, president of G.G. Toys, was discussing last month's operating results with Audrey Hausner, G.G.'s conkoller, and David Morehouse, G.G.'s manufacturing manager. The meeting was taking place in an atmosphere tinged with apprehension because margins on thelr most popular product, the "Geoffrey doll," had been declining rapidly in the last few years due to rising production costs (summary operating results for the previous month, March 2000, arc shown in Exhibits 1 and 2). Parker saw no choice but to shift the company's product mix towards specialty dolls that carried a high price premium, and thus, a 34% margin. G.G. Toys was a leading supplier of high-quality dolls to retail toy stores throughout the U.S, The comPany had started with a unique design for molding highly durable dolls using vinyl and resin materials. G.G. quickly established a loyal customer base among retailers because of the high quality and popularity of its manufactured dolls. It soon established a major presence in the market with its high-volume...

Words: 329 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Taj Toy Case Study

...3. INTRODUCTION The “Taj” brand was established in 2000 by husband and wife team Cornelio and Imma Cesario. The company designed a small range of toys that were manufactured in their home country. These toys proved to be popular in their home country and Cornelio Cesario then expanded the range of products. By 2005, within five years of starting jot, the founders were encouraged to see Taj’s products ordered by many large toy retailers across Europe. By this stage the companyhad grown considerably, and had annual sales of almost $2 million. Commencing in 2004, Taj toy started outsourcing all of its manufacturing to a range of manufacturing companies in china in order to reduce its cost base and to enable the company to price its products more competitively. By the end of 2010, sales revenue exceeded $8 million and the company had achieved substantial sales revenue growth each year. Taj has seen its sales revenue growth by 16% in the year ended December 31, 2010 and by almost 18% in the year to December 31, 2011. 4. BODY 4.1. KEY ISSUES/GOALS/PROBLEMS 4.1.1. Near-shoring proposal in Vietnam The first concern is to consider outsourcing part of its manufacturing to Vietnam and the board of directors has asked to consider this proposal from financial, strategic and operational viewpoints with main considerations on demand, production and costs. In some financial matters, Mrs. Cesario thought that there will be no differences in selling price of products made in Vietnam as......

Words: 664 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Mattel Toys Recall Case

...available locally. Furthermore, expertise in risk management, financial management, and other fields can be contracted through outsourcing. As far as Mattel is concerned, the key motivation for outsourcing is to have access to cheap labor, reducing manufacturing cost significantly. Causes of Mattel’s Recall Problem There are three main causes for Mattel’s toy recall: manufacturing problems which refers to the use of lead paint by Chinese manufacturers; design problem as a result of increasing use of small, powerful magnets that have the risk to be swallowed by children if detached, and; product misuse by young creative children which may cause potential danger to them. Among those three reasons, only manufacturing problems are potentially the result of outsourcing. The design and product misuse issues were not the responsibility of contract manufacturers. Outsourcing Pitfalls While outsourcing can reduce costs for companies, it can also give rise to a series of problems if those companies fail to see a clear picture of their outsourcing partners and fail to identify all the possible pitfalls. Specifically for Mattel, the Chinese toy manufacturer gained their competitive advantages by achieving low costs. However, since they were facing pressures both from tremendous negotiating power of large manufacturers such as Wal-Mart and the monetary policy change that...

Words: 1060 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Toy R Us Case Study

...Case study Toys “R” Us JAPAN Case study Toys “R” Us JAPAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 3. Japan Background and facts: 4. Background: 4 Facts: 5 Toys “R” Us Background 7. The Beginning: 7 Market Expansion 8 More ways to shop Toys “R” Us 8 Evolving business 9 Toys “R” Us in Japan 9 Case analysis: 10 Attractive factors of Japan toy market: 10 Barriers to Entry: 10 Success Factors for Toy's "R" Us-Japan 11 TRU Strategy 13 Our opinion: 14 Recommendations: 15 Conclusion: 16 References:: 16 Introduction: Toys R Us is the large distributor in the US and it is one of the more successful foreign retailers in Japan after overcome hard barriers. This successful is a result of right decision-making and strategy in overseas expansion by global retailer’s and gradual changes after entry into foreign markets. Also the strategy in respect of standardization adaption before and after entry has great effect in this successful. Coming lines, shows some factors that attract TRU to join venture in Japan. Then, we will discuss group of barriers that TRU had overcome, and how it’s overcome these barriers. In the end, we will evaluate Toys “R” Us in Japan market. Japan Background and facts: Background: Government: Parliamentary with constitutional monarchy Prime Minister: Shinzō Abe (elected Dec 2012) Capital: Tokyo Population: 127,368,088 Population Growth Rate: -0.077% (2012 est.), World Rank: 198th Birth Rate: 8.39 births/1,000......

Words: 3158 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Case Analysis – Specialty Toys

...Case Analysis – Specialty Toys 1. Senior sales forecaster predicted and expected demand of 20,000 units with .95 probability that demand would be between 10,000 and 30,000 units. P (10,000 < x< 30,000) = .95 (30,000-20,000)/1.96 = 5,102 X = the demand of Weather Teddy Mean µ = 20,000 Standard Deviation α = 5,102 The normal distribution of the demand for the Weather Teddy is represented in the graph below. This is based off of the forecast of previous selling history of other similar toys. The forecast shows that the demand for the Weather Teddy will be at 20,000 units, but with a probability of .95 of selling anywhere between 10k to 20k units. Therefore, with the information given the standard deviation of this forecast is at 5,102. 2. With various order quantities suggested by members of the management team, it would be wise to compute the probability of a stock-out for each of the order quantities suggested. The probability of a stock-out is the inverse of the probability that the quantity sold is less than or equal to the amount purchased by the company. 1st Formula used: z = (x - µ) / σ The probability of a stock out is calculated by subtracting the probability found in the chart from 1. Suggested Quantity to Order | Probability of a Stock-Out | 15,000 | 83.65% | 18,000 | 65.17% | 24,000 | 21.77% | 28,000 | 5.82% | 3. Based on the various order quantities suggested by members of the management team, a simple profit analysis...

Words: 914 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Creative Toys Case

...Creative Toys Inc. 1. If Inventory were to be written down in the 4th quarter instead of the 2nd quarter, it could cause the company to be compromised. One of the reasons that the allowance occurs in the 2nd quarter is because Browne realizes that it will make expenses appear too high, but, it will reduce the impact of the lack of future sales. However, if inventory were established in the 4th quarter, where they are expected to increase quite a bit, the transition would be easier. This is the reasoning behind Gurchick’s insistence of waiting for the 4th quarter. On the down side, if sales do not increase as expected, the company would be in substantial trouble. They will have a great deal of over stated income, which will be caught by auditors. They will make adjusting journal entries for this, which will decrease net income. If this decrease is too substantial then the books will be in the negative. Browne understands that the Chatter Chick was over produced, and is prepared to deal with the consequence. Gurchick prefers to take a gamble and hope for the best. 2. The corporate culture at Creative Toys is probably quite tense at this point. With Browne and Gurchick disagreeing over the course of action, the employees at this point are most likely wondering what the outcome of the decrease in demand will be and whether the company will be able to make it through this. I think that everyone is probably quite worried and tense at this point, and things are likely going......

Words: 417 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Toy Central Case

...Risks at Toy Central Corporation Christine E. Earley and Fred Phillips INTRODUCTION [pic]s a senior in a professional services firm, you have been assigned to plan the financial statement audit of a private company named Toy Central Corporation (TCC). In addition, the partner on the engagement has asked you to identify business risks that could adversely affect TCC’s sustained profitability, so that they can be brought to the attention of the company’s board of directors. These tasks will require you to draw on your knowledge of supply chain management, marketing, internal controls, audit assertions, and financial accounting. COMPANY BACKGROUND Toy Central Corporation (TCC) designs, manufactures, and markets a variety of toys, which are sold primarily to large national retailers like Wal-Mart, Toys R Us, Kmart, and Target. TCC is a small company compared to competitors Mattel and Hasbro; nevertheless, TCC’s managers believe its toys are among the best in the world. Unlike the larger toy makers, which bring thousands of toys to market each year but experience success with only a fraction of them, TCC has enjoyed success with a small portfolio of brands and products, representing three categories: (1) soft toys, consisting primarily of its Cuddle Monsters stuffed animals; (2) hard toys, including metal-cast and plastic-cast toys like Fast Racers cars and Acto action figures; and (3) digital toys, consisting of video game software under development. Like most toy......

Words: 2391 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Management

...Lego occupies a strong position in the market for construction toys with relatively few rivals one must consider that Lego is now competing in boarder market of children's entertainment which in the lead up to 2004 began in include large incumbents from the electronics sector such as Sega and Nintendo. Power of buys The power of the buyer in the case of Lego may be seen as relatively high with low switching costs between alternative toys and even substitute products such as video games and television. Power of suppliers The power of suppliers may be seen as average, Lego's products on the whole may be seen as largely based upon standardised inputs such as plastics and chemicals. There is the consideration that were Lego chooses to move into non-traditional areas such as sets associated with films or games the power of suppliers will increase as a key input becomes that of licences which is a form of intellectual property. Threat of substitutes This may be seen as the largest threat to the Lego group in the run up to the end of 2004. Although it is difficult to define what market a company occupies (Grant 2008, Porter 2004) for the purpose of considering the impact of substitution one must consider Lego to be a provider of children's entertainment. In this case the threat from substitutes are rather high given that consumers may substitute between alternative traditional toys such as action figures or toy cars through to electronic products such as video......

Words: 381 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Discuss the Competitive Forces That Influence Profitability Potential in the Toy Industry.

...2.  Discuss the competitive forces that influence profitability potential in the toy industry. Potential entrants Threat of entry in toy industry is moderate. To develop, produce, and market a new toy takes large capital investment in research, development and marketing a product. Within the toy industry, there are large economies of scale, specifically in the marketing segment. Mattel has many well known brands in the marketplace such as Fisher-Price, Hot Wheels, and Barbie. To have the buyers informed, the company has to invest large capital in advertising and marketing. Without having this done to each product, these toys wouldn’t be successful as successful as they are exactly because of the popularity of these products, it is extremely difficult for new companies to compete in this industry. This advantage decreases the threat that new entrants for Mattel. ------------------------------------------------- New entrants may have problems setting up distribution channels because large, established companies already dominate them.. For instance, Mattel has set up numerous relationships with big companies such as Wal- Mart, Target and Toys R Us. ------------------------------------------------- A barrier that new entrants must surpass is the legal barrier. In the toy industrymany products are being patented. Many potential products like ones related to the movie industry, have patents that only certain companies have the rights to. For example, Mattel holds the......

Words: 1107 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Hightower Department Stores: Imported Stuffed Animals

...1993, before the annual buying trip to Germany for the 1993 Christmas season, the toy buyer for the chain of Hightower Department Stores named Julia Brown was reviewing the performance of some models of stuffed animals tested for sales during 1992. Every time Julia’s on the trip, she would buy some stuffed animals for testing. Fifty was the minimum amount the manufacturers require. Based on Julia’s years of buying experience, the tested result would give Julia a clear estimation about how many new stuffed animals she needed to order. Figure 1 in below shows the timeline of how Julia buys the toys for the company: 1992 January 1993 December 1994 50 of Each Tested for sale: Evaluation Test Results then Order Estimated Number of Bear, Pig, Bear, Pig, & Raccoon & Buy Test Toys for 1994 Christmas & Raccoon for Christmas Season Figure 1: Timeline of how Julia buys the toys for the company Decision Problem During last year, three stuffed animals were tested for sale, including a bear, a pig, and a raccoon. The result shown there were 10 out of 50 bears, 4 out of 50 pigs, and 32 out of 50 raccoons sold. Julia was faced with a decision to make about whether she should import the toys from Germany or but the toys domestically, and if the toys were to be imported, how many of bears, pigs, and raccoons she should buy......

Words: 987 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Mattel Case Study Analysis

...Mattel Case Study analysis II Problem Statement As per the case study, Mattel’s main issue is that they are not living up to their core mission. The case clearly states that Mattel’s philosophy is to satisfy the customer’s needs and wants. Delivering what the customer needs and wants can be segregated into two broad categories: First, product development: According to the case, Mattel’s product development ensures that its portfolio never stagnates. Unfortunately, Mattel has failed to adapt to the evolving demands of children, as they are becoming increasingly technologically savvy and are therefore interested in electronic and interactive rather than traditional toys such as Barbie or Hot Wheels at a younger age. This is evident, for example, from the demise of the ‘ELLO’ building toys for young girls1.The product development disparity between customers’ needs and Mattel’s production is further demonstrated by their lack of attention to their global market, which, according to the text, account for 46% of gross sales. This is evident in the Malaysian Consumers Association having attempted to ban the Barbie brand, one of Mattel’s core products, because of her non-Asian appearance and the lack of intellectual stimulation that Barbie provides; and many other countries are following suit. According to the text, Asian sales account for a mere 11% of Mattel’s gross revenues. Second, Corporate and Social Responsibility: A strong product is no longer enough; customers......

Words: 2337 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Technology Transfer

...Industrial Promotion and Technology Branch TECHNOLOGY PAPER SERIES 6/05 Technology Transfer and Trade: The Toy Industry in India UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION I N D U S T R I A L P R O M OT I O N A N D T EC H N O LO GY B R A N C H Technology Transfer and Trade: The Toy Industry in India TECHNOLOGY PAPER SERIES TPS 6/05 December 2005 UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Vienna, 2005 UNIDO Industrial Promotion and Technology Branch Technology Paper Series TPS No. 6/2005 December 2005 Technology Transfer & Trade in Toy Industry of India Copyright © 2004 by United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) The designati ons employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO) concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The responsibility for options expressed rests solely with the authors, and publication does not constitute an endorsement by UNIDO of the opinions expressed. This document has been produced without formal editing. The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the Secretariat of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. Any indication of, or reference to, a country,......

Words: 7419 - Pages: 30

Premium Essay

Sales in Toy Industry

...GROUP 7 GROUP 7 TOY INDUSTRY SUBJECT: SMSP TOY INDUSTRY SUBJECT: SMSP DHARAM JOSHI VISHAL NARULA POOJA SAMPAT VINEET HARDA CHIRAG SHAH KUNAL PAREKH DHARAM JOSHI VISHAL NARULA POOJA SAMPAT VINEET HARDA CHIRAG SHAH KUNAL PAREKH GROUP MEMBERS GROUP MEMBERS India’s market potential The Indian toy industry is estimated at about 1.4 billion US dollars and until now has generated only 0.5 per cent of the global market. However, growth of some 15 % promises a rapid rise in this statistic, especially in the context of the growing middle class and increasing demand for quality and luxury goods. In recent years, cities like Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Hyderabad and Pune have become the most important manufacturing sites of the Indian toy industry. Among the local manufacturers in India about 59 % are still focusing on the production of cheap and unbranded toys which appeals to the price-sensitive Indian consumers. In the future it is expected that these companies will shift towards branded toys as well to stay competitive with international companies. Internet retailing is becoming a more and more important distribution channel due to several reasons. Consumers have increasing access to the internet and online retailers often have better merchandise in terms of variety, new launches and the offer of branded toys. The share of internet retailing in sales grew from 1 % in 2007 up to 18 % in 2012. Focus on quality Indian consumers pay more and more attention to......

Words: 3089 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Not Applicable

...Mega Brands Magnetic Toys Can Hurt The major problem with Mega Brands is with the safety of the children that play with the toys. Magnets fall off of the toy and children swallow the magnets which can cause stomach flu like symptoms and has even caused one child to die. Another problem is Mega Brands refusing to cooperate with the U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission. According to CPSC.com, “The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission is charged with protecting the public from unreasonable risks of injury or death from thousands of types of consumer products under the agency's jurisdiction. The U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission is committed to protecting consumers and families from products that pose a fire, electrical, chemical, or mechanical hazard or can injure children.” The U.S. Consumer Products Safety Commission has a job to do as well as Mega Brands. From one business to another, Mega Brands should have responded to the recalls that could have prevented a lot of children from being sick. According to our text on page 263 “data was submitted covering 1,500 complaint reports made to Mega Brands”. Mega Brands “lacked an organized comprehensive reporting system.” (Brooks, Leonard J. Page 263.) If the organization was better this complaints could have been a red flag to get the toys off of the market. The concerns that I would express to the CEO about the Magnetix to issues would be that there has been a reported death from our toys. This alone should make......

Words: 1676 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Question 1 - Mattel & Toy Recall (a)

...Question 1: From the case, the characteristics of the toy industry: 1. Seasonal Demand Demand for toys is usually correlated with festive celebrations in a country. One close example is Christmas day which falls in December annually. Coincide with this celebration, significant portion of the toy’s annual sales usually happen towards the end of the year especially in those countries that are dominated by those that celebrate Christmas. The impacts of the seasonal pattern towards the industry are critical as most manufacturers have to consider several factors that lead to sales. The huge demand at certain period of time requires thoughtful planning and smooth execution as minor mistakes can lead to loss of millions of sales value. Just imagine within short period of time toy manufacturers have to produce millions of toys. This requires good management of supplies and synchronization between supplies and production as to minimize costs and ensuring efficiency. Not to forget issues of quality management and lastly the impacts or magnitude of logistic management to the toy manufacturers. 2. Stiff Competition Basically the toy industry consists of many players. As stated in the case, there are 880 companies operated in the industry in 2002. This is 10% lesser than 1997. There are few Key players in the industry such as Mattel, Hasbro, RC2, JAAKS Pacific, Marvel and Lego. In term of sales only two companies managed to register USD1 billion marks, the company are,...

Words: 552 - Pages: 3