Premium Essay

Traditional Argument

In: Other Topics

Submitted By meredithhague
Words 1348
Pages 6
In 2011, there were 19,454 reported cases of vaccine preventable diseases in the United States alone (Rouch 2011). Most of these cases could have been prevented simply by getting a vaccination for certain diseases. There has been much discussion in recent years over whether or not parents should have their children vaccinated. Parents hear a great deal of information in the medi about the effectiveness and side effects of vaccinations. After hearing all sorts of negative things about vaccinations, it is easy to see why parents would be reluctant to have their children injected with all sorts of chemicals. In the end, the reason that children are not required to be vaccinated is that it is illegal to force someone to be vaccinated, but is it right to send unvaccinated children to school with other children? The fact of the matter, is that immunizations do their job and all children who attend public schools should be vaccinated and protected from preventable diseases. Some people assume that because certain diseases like Polio have been eradicated from the United States it is now unnecessary to be required to receive the vaccination. This assumption could not be any farther from the truth. Polio is still a huge problem in other regions across the globe (WHO 2007). If it were re-introduced into disease free places, the results could be devastating for those unprotected from such viruses. In 2008, an unvaccinated 7 year old contracted measles while he and his family were traveling in Europe. After he returned home to the United States, he exposed 839 people to the disease and 11 children who were also not vaccinated, contracted the disease as well. Of these 11 children, 3 of them were babies who were too young to have been vaccinated. The negligence of this family caused the hospitalization of one of these babies who didn’t even have the chance to be protected against...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Argument Vs Traditional Argument

...Review Question 1) When I encountered the word argument, I thought that, argument was the disagreement between two opposition where person is defending his or hers point of view. After reading the chapter. I think argument is selling an arguer point of view, or convincing the targeted audience about the topic or argument with the help of evidence. Argument is also finding the common ground to solve the issue. 2) Traditional argument: Argument, where arguer often argue with the available persuasion to convince or to agree his or her audience with them. Example: I) President Obama was talking about the gun control action, and tightening the gun laws. II) A sales person is convincing the customer that, the particular car has a high resale...

Words: 558 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Arguments in Regards to Traditional Marriage

...Arguments in Regards to Traditional Marriage Angela Richardson PHI 103 Informal Logic John Ludes April.27 2015 Arguments in Regards to Traditional Marriage There are a lot of arguments in regards to traditional marriage and allowing same-sex marriage. This essay will review an argument in regards to the stance on not changing traditional marriage and will also provide a counterargument argument on the stance of not changing traditional marriage. This essay will also evaluate and identify the different components of both arguments. There has been a lot of debate in regards to whether traditional marriage should stay in tack or if it should be alltraled. The first argument we will review is against any changes to traditional marriage and that it should remain between a man and a woman. This argument consists of the idea that marriage should stay between a man and a women in order to produces and raise children together and that if marriage is changed it will no longer benefit society as it was originally designed. The argument also states keeping traditional marriage intact does not conflict with everyone’s liberty. One of the biggest premises the argument hold is that “Marriage exists to bring a man and a woman together as husband and wife to be father and mother to any children their union produces” (para. 8). This premise is based on the fact that it requires a man and a woman to produce a child and the belief that every child does better when raised by a mother and......

Words: 1523 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Visual Argument

...1). What background information do you need to know in order to read this image intelligibly? You do not need any background information to read this visual argument. This photo is self-explanatory. 2). What do you see? I see a man verbally abusing a lady. What are the key details or features here that stand out? The man’s face, fist punching the lady from his mouth, and the pain on the ladies face all stand out to support my theory. What images? The image is self-explanatory. What text? There was no text to support this visual argument. What supporting details? Every aspect of this photo supports my argument. 3). Identify the issue(s): Based on the picture it presents, what issue does this visual seem to be referencing? This visual seem to be referencing verbal abuse. This is a great picture to really explain how words can be painful. What debate is it part of? The visual debates the seriousness of verbal abuse and the effects. 4). Defining the Perspective: What side in this debate is this visual taking? The visual is taking the side of women, showing how men verbally abuse women. What perspective on this issue does this visual seem to take? This visual seem to support the seriousness of verbal abuse. It shows how people’s words can really be as painful as a punch in the face. 5). Defining the Argument: How do we know what side of this debate the visual is taking? This visual is taking the side of women. It is showing how men can verbally abuse a......

Words: 911 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Chapt. 9

...are the four goals of Rogerian argument, and how do they differ from those of traditional argument? The four goals of Rogerian is for writers to let readers know they understand, show the readers have a valid point to a certain extent, show that both parties have the same principles in significant ways, and to propose solutions from both parties that can be agreed on. The difference in Rogerian and traditional is that traditional stand on its belief and attempts to sway the audience whereas Rogerian stands at the view of the audience and try to reel in the audience. 2. What are some of the advantages and disadvantages of Rogerian argument? The advantages of Rogerian that it is a good way to grasp the attention of the audience to semi show them the opposition but the disadvantage is that you will have to pretty much take the opposition side to even get a grip of your own beliefs. 3. In what type of argumentation situation do you think you might find Rogerian argument more productive than traditional argument? Describe an issue, along with the rhetorical situation, which might prompt you to resort to Rogerian argument. Even though the topic may be very controversial Rogerian would be better in the argument of same sex marriage whereas using rhetorical situation could make it an audience feel very uncomfortable. 4. In what type of argumentation situation do you think you might find traditional argument more productive than Rogerian argument? Describe an issue,......

Words: 344 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Rhetorical Structures

...audience, purpose, and context can affect an argument. Notice it or not arguments take place in our everyday lives, as ridiculous as it may sound it is absolutely true. Some people believe that arguments can better be solved through verbal altercations and fist fights, however a successful argument is one that is calm collective and appropriate. An argument is affected by the audience, purpose, and context. There are two different types of arguments traditional argument and consensual argument. A traditional argument is having proof of what you are arguing so that you can target your audience members to agree with the side of the argument that you are on. Some examples of a traditional argument are public debate, courtroom argument, single-perspective argument and one-on-one everyday argument. A consensual argument is when the possibility of an argument is brought about by arguers who acknowledge different points of view and work to identify a combination of views that are acceptable to the majority of the audience members. Some examples of a consensual argument are dialectic, academic inquiry, negotiation and mediation, and internal argument. In order for an argument to be successful it needs to have an issue which is the problem or situation of which the argument is about. A successful argument must also have an arguer it can be one or more people who have different perspectives of whatever the subject may be. A successful argument must also include an audience, an......

Words: 714 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

En 1420 Unit 1 Assignment 1 when students begin reading at two instead of four they are more advanced in school. 3) Traditional argument is a traditional argument where two people are trying to prove a point. One example of this is a public debate among. Another example is a single-perspective argument. Consensual argument is a argument is a kind of argument or bargain that aims at a commonly agreed position. It is a dialogue that negotiates for a consensus. In dialectic, one type of consensual argument, two or more people participate as equals in a dialogue to try to discover what seems to be the best position on an issue. Another example is academic inquiry. Its purpose is to discover, through reading, discussion, and writing, new views, new knowledge, and new truths about complex issues. 4) The elements for an argument to work best include: An issue; an arguer; an audience; common ground; a forum; audience outcomes. 5) The elements for an argument to fail include: No disagreement or reason to argue; risky or trivial issues; difficulty in establishing common ground; standoffs or fights that result in negative outcomes. 6) An example of an ethical argument might be a plan for an effective and economical way to rebuild an area that has been destroyed by hurricanes, floods, or fire. Another example of an ethical argument may be a debate about slavery. An example of unethical argument might be an invitation to acquire a new...

Words: 425 - Pages: 2

Free Essay


...and we eat too many grains, secondly, industrially produced meats effect on our morbidity and mortality and industrial agriculture damages the environment too. The author also argues that eliminating industrial production of animal products would help us stop consuming so much meat. He believes that traditional production would be better because of its lack of efficiency compared to industrial production and would help reduce consumption. He also believes that it’s not just about eating red meat, but about the general over consumption of junk food that causes health risks. He believes that studies on red meat exaggerate and are largely inaccurate. The author provides scientific studies that he analyzed to formulate his argument and then presents articles from other newspapers on the topic, and we think all the information is relevant to the subject and he uses it in a logical manner. The article defines the main ideas properly but it lacks background information on certain pertaining subjects. The information is well used and interpreted; however, we dismissed counter arguments in a very brisk, informal manner. He provides little, but good information against his article. His argument is well base on accurate, trust worthy sources and he presents his ideas in a logical manner....

Words: 268 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Understanding Arguement

...1) Before I started to read Chapter 1, I thought that the word argument had to do with a discussion two or more people; whether calm or severe to argue the difference in their opinions. After reading the chapter, I found that there are various types and forms of arguments. 2) Arguments are everywhere! If doesn’t matter whether there is a child/teenager arguing with their parents over being disciplined, to friendly conversation on two or more sports fans and their favorite team, and/or a returning military member/veteran coming from war and finding that there is no government support or jobs for them as they come home from war. 3) A Traditional argument is a person or persons that are making an argument with the means of persuading to convince an audience to change positions and agree with the arguer. An example of a (n) traditional argument is public debates (i.e.: presidential debates) or court hearing. A Consensual argument emphasizes an agreement. An example of a consensual argument are two team members that dialogue all their ideas to try and discover what will be their best position to on any issue or idea. 4) Conditions which are necessary for an argument to work best are: * An issue: An argument needs as its central focus an issue that has not yet been settled, or has become unsettled. * An arguer: Ideally every argument requires a person who is motivated to initiate the argument, to take a position on the issue, to obtain and consider information, and to...

Words: 683 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Unit1 Assign1 Roberts Comp2

...Unit 1 Assignment 1 1. What did you think when you encountered the word argument as you began to read this chapter? What do you think now? A. When I first encountered the word “argument” in this chapter, I immediately thought of the shouting matches that I would so often engage in with my father. However, upon further reading, I have discovered that in reality, argument means any subject upon which there is the possibility of having more than one view or standpoint. 2. Provide three examples of your own to illustrate the statement “Argument is everywhere.” One of your examples should be a visual argument. A. Argument is everywhere. This statement is evidenced by the fact that people everywhere are arguing. Whether is be about Romney's inane babble, or the fact that Obama hasn't fixed the Universe yet, people continue to argue their side of any disagreement. Another good example is bow ties. Some people think that bow ties are not cool. These people would be wrong because bow ties are in fact, very cool. 3. Describe traditional and consensual argument. Give two examples of each. A. Traditional argument is based around winning. It is where two parties are engaged in an argument, not with the goal of convincing the other party that they are right, but instead trying to prove that the other party is wrong. An example of consensual argument is where a group considers all sides of an argument and then tries to reach consensus or agreement about which side pleases......

Words: 657 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Whistle Blowing

...on complaints of retaliation, the act set up the Merit System Protection Board. The Whistle-Blower Protection Act of 1989 reinforces this protection with the formation of the Office of Special Counsel for going through whistle-blower reports. In both private and public sectors, federal legislation protects whistle-blowers, and some states even give rewards for whistle-blowing. Regarding whistle-blower protection, there are arguments in favor of it as well as arguments against it. The main argument in its favor is that the society can benefit from the revealing of illegal activities, waste, and mismanagement; this can only occur if whistle-blowers can come forward without having to worry about any retaliatory actions. Another argument is that those who work for the government have a First Amendment right to freedom of speech and so should be protected from retaliation. Also, those who work in the private sector have a moral right that requires legal protection. The final argument is that employees have a right to act as their conscience dictates. An argument against whistle-blower protection is that the law that recognizes whistle-blowing can be abused. Unhappy employees may use whistle-blowing to a variety of things for their own gain. It also overrides the...

Words: 753 - Pages: 4

Free Essay


...Writing [pic] When we speak and/or write to our family and friends, we use an informal style. However when we give a presentation, write an essay, review, and dissertation, we have to use a more formal style. There are eight main categories to consider. 1. Informal Personal style used. For example: …we are not sure if…,/ …. we can argue that… Formal Impersonal style used. For example:….It is debatable whether…/ …there are several arguments in favour of… 2. Informal Use the active voice. For example: I conducted the research by….. Formal Use the passive Voice. For example: The Research was conducted by 3. Informal Contractions used. For example: Wouldn’t’ve, didn’t. Formal Contractions not normally used. For example: would not have, did not. 4. Informal Colloquialisms (slang words) and clichés can be used. For example: This is a naff argument or this argument should be taken with a pinch a salt. Formal Collquialisms and clichés are avoided. For example: This argument should be treated with some scepticism 5. Informal Main meaning is given by verbs. For example: We have to delay introducing the new system. Formal Main meaning given by nouns (nominalisation). For example: There has been a delay in the introduction of the new system 6. Informal We don’t necessarily have to be precise with our vocabulary. For example: This thing is no good. It’s never worked......

Words: 361 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Unit 1 Assignment 1 Chapter Review and Visual Argument

...Steps for Reading Visual Argument 1. Some history about computers 2. A beat up car and a nice new car, a tired mechanic and a happy mechanic, and computer company logos 3. Who’s computer is better 4. That Apple makes a better computer than Microsoft 5. The Apple side is new, faster looking and the mechanic looks happy 6. It wants people to buy Apple computer Review Questions 1. What did you think of when you encountered the word argument as you began to read this chapter? What do you think now? I thought an argument was when more than one person had opposing views on the same issue. After reading this chapter I feel that the word argument is much broader than just a disagreement between two people. 2. Provide three examples of your own to illustrate the statement “Argument is everywhere.” One of your examples should be a visual argument. * Who makes the better video game console Microsoft, Sony, or a PC gaming rig. * T.V. commercials * nicoleashleyrd. (Artist). (2013, Feb 4). Visual Arguments [Web Drawing]. Retrieved from 3. Describe traditional and consensual argument. Give two examples of each. A traditional argument is when you try to change the audience point of view and a consensual argument seems to be one where the two parties must come to an agreement. Traditional * A movie trailer * Consensual * A couple trying to decide......

Words: 398 - Pages: 2

Free Essay


...saying this book or novel is about love or showing someone it is about love. What debate is it part of? The part to debate is this novel or book. Is this book telling you facts on how to love or is it telling you how to love and will it work. Step 4: Defining the Perspective: What side in this debate is this visual taking? Is the book really about love or is it a love novel. What perspective on this issue does this visual seem to take? It is making Step 5: Defining the Argument: How do we know what side of this debate the visual is taking? What specific claims about this issue does the visual seem to be making? That this book will make you feel happy about been in love Step 6: Thinking in Terms of Audience: What sort of response does this visual seem to want from its viewers? They are tring to grab your attention with the lights and making a heart out of the pages What messages or lessons does it want to convey? Is it successful? 1. What did you think of when you encountered the word argument as you began to read this...

Words: 649 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

En 1420 Unit 1 Assignment

...EN 1420 Unit 1 Assignment 1. When I first encountered the word argument I immediately thought of politics. Now, I think of a conversation between people of opposing views discussing their personal point of view. 2. Politics/ School classes/ competing companies via T.V. commercials 3. Traditional arguments can be described as someone who wants to convince their audience to side with them and accept their points of view. This is seen in presidential elections and public debates. Consensual argument is the emphasis of agreement. This type of argument is often seen in the classroom amongst peers. 4. Some of the conditions necessary for an argument to work best would be; an issue, an arguer, audience, common ground, a forum, and audience outcomes. 5. Conditions of a failing argument would be; no disagreement or reason to argue, risky r trivial issue, inability to establish common ground, and standoffs or fights resulting in negative outcomes. 6. Ethical Argument- Ways to rebuild the economy/ ways to better the path of our nation. Unethical Argument- New credit lines that incur debt/ Advertisements for plastic surgery. 7. The role of the audience has changed drastically in the world as we catapult into the digital age. So easily now people are able to reach new information (good and bad, true and false) by simply getting onto the internet and clicking around. 8. Four sources of arguable issues can be found in many places, but the......

Words: 254 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Visual Argument

...1) When I first started read the chapter and encountered argument I really didn’t know what to think except that most people argue about one thing or another (happens a lot with my brother and myself), but that I’ve read the chapter I have I a new respect for what it takes to put together an argument to make people understand your side of an issue. 2) Argument is everywhere. This statement true do to the fact with all the things happen now a days people are arguing about just about everything from the government passing a law that allows them to spy on people, or that people believe that all states should follow Washington and Colorado in legalizing marijuana. 3) A traditional argument is based off the ideal of winning the argument, for example when there is a presidental debate in which both side try to prove the other one wrong. An example of consensual argument is when a group looks at all side of an arugment and trys to come up with a consenus on whos ideal help/benefits most or all people involved. 4) The conditions in which an argument works best is when there are the following, 1. An issue (a central focus point), 2. An arguer (someone who knows about the issue and is motivated to initiate an argument), 3. An audience ( people that are willing to listen to the argument weather they be friendly or hostile), 4. Common ground ( an effective argument nust have some kind of common ground between the audience and arguer that is relevant to the issue), 5. A forum......

Words: 350 - Pages: 2