Free Essay

U.S Downgrade

In: Business and Management

Submitted By ankitajhawar19
Words 3561
Pages 15
August 5, 2011

Research Update:

United States of America Long-Term Rating Lowered To 'AA+' On Political Risks And Rising Debt Burden; Outlook Negative
Primary Credit Analyst: Nikola G Swann, CFA, FRM, Toronto (1) 416-507-2582;nikola_swann@standardandpoors.com Secondary Contacts: John Chambers, CFA, New York (1) 212-438-7344;john_chambers@standardandpoors.com David T Beers, London (44) 20-7176-7101;david_beers@standardandpoors.com

Table Of Contents
Overview Rating Action Rationale Outlook Related Criteria And Research Ratings List

www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect

1
883559 | 300978643

Research Update:

United States of America Long-Term Rating Lowered To 'AA+' On Political Risks And Rising Debt Burden; Outlook Negative
Overview
• We have lowered our long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America to 'AA+' from 'AAA' and affirmed the 'A-1+' short-term rating. • We have also removed both the short- and long-term ratings from CreditWatch negative. • The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration recently agreed to falls short of what, in our view, would be necessary to stabilize the government's medium-term debt dynamics. • More broadly, the downgrade reflects our view that the effectiveness, stability, and predictability of American policymaking and political institutions have weakened at a time of ongoing fiscal and economic challenges to a degree more than we envisioned when we assigned a negative outlook to the rating on April 18, 2011. • Since then, we have changed our view of the difficulties in bridging the gulf between the political parties over fiscal policy, which makes us pessimistic about the capacity of Congress and the Administration to be able to leverage their agreement this week into a broader fiscal consolidation plan that stabilizes the government's debt dynamics any time soon. • The outlook on the long-term rating is negative. We could lower the long-term rating to 'AA' within the next two years if we see that less reduction in spending than agreed to, higher interest rates, or new fiscal pressures during the period result in a higher general government debt trajectory than we currently assume in our base case.

Rating Action
On Aug. 5, 2011, Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered its long-term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America to 'AA+' from 'AAA'. The outlook on the long-term rating is negative. At the same time, Standard & Poor's affirmed its 'A-1+' short-term rating on the U.S. In addition, Standard & Poor's removed both ratings from CreditWatch, where they were placed on July 14, 2011, with negative implications. The transfer and convertibility (T&C) assessment of the U.S.--our assessment of the likelihood of official interference in the ability of U.S.-based public- and private-sector issuers to secure foreign exchange for debt service--remains 'AAA'.

Standard & Poor’s | RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal | August 5, 2011

2
883559 | 300978643

Research Update: United States of America Long-Term Rating Lowered To 'AA+' On Political Risks And Rising Debt Burden; Outlook Negative

Rationale
We lowered our long-term rating on the U.S. because we believe that the prolonged controversy over raising the statutory debt ceiling and the related fiscal policy debate indicate that further near-term progress containing the growth in public spending, especially on entitlements, or on reaching an agreement on raising revenues is less likely than we previously assumed and will remain a contentious and fitful process. We also believe that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration agreed to this week falls short of the amount that we believe is necessary to stabilize the general government debt burden by the middle of the decade. Our lowering of the rating was prompted by our view on the rising public debt burden and our perception of greater policymaking uncertainty, consistent with our criteria (see "Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and Assumptions ," June 30, 2011, especially Paragraphs 36-41). Nevertheless, we view the U.S. federal government's other economic, external, and monetary credit attributes, which form the basis for the sovereign rating, as broadly unchanged. We have taken the ratings off CreditWatch because the Aug. 2 passage of the Budget Control Act Amendment of 2011 has removed any perceived immediate threat of payment default posed by delays to raising the government's debt ceiling. In addition, we believe that the act provides sufficient clarity to allow us to evaluate the likely course of U.S. fiscal policy for the next few years. The political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America's governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less predictable than what we previously believed. The statutory debt ceiling and the threat of default have become political bargaining chips in the debate over fiscal policy. Despite this year's wide-ranging debate, in our view, the differences between political parties have proven to be extraordinarily difficult to bridge, and, as we see it, the resulting agreement fell well short of the comprehensive fiscal consolidation program that some proponents had envisaged until quite recently. Republicans and Democrats have only been able to agree to relatively modest savings on discretionary spending while delegating to the Select Committee decisions on more comprehensive measures. It appears that for now, new revenues have dropped down on the menu of policy options. In addition, the plan envisions only minor policy changes on Medicare and little change in other entitlements, the containment of which we and most other independent observers regard as key to long-term fiscal sustainability. Our opinion is that elected officials remain wary of tackling the structural issues required to effectively address the rising U.S. public debt burden in a manner consistent with a 'AAA' rating and with 'AAA' rated sovereign peers (see Sovereign Government Rating Methodology and Assumptions," June 30, 2011, especially Paragraphs 36-41). In our view, the difficulty in framing a consensus on fiscal policy weakens the government's ability to manage public finances and diverts attention from the debate over how to achieve more balanced and dynamic economic growth in an era of fiscal stringency and private-sector deleveraging (ibid). A new political consensus might (or might not) emerge after the 2012 elections, but we believe that by

www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect

3
883559 | 300978643

Research Update: United States of America Long-Term Rating Lowered To 'AA+' On Political Risks And Rising Debt Burden; Outlook Negative

then, the government debt burden will likely be higher, the needed medium-term fiscal adjustment potentially greater, and the inflection point on the U.S. population's demographics and other age-related spending drivers closer at hand (see "Global Aging 2011: In The U.S., Going Gray Will Likely Cost Even More Green, Now," June 21, 2011). Standard & Poor's takes no position on the mix of spending and revenue measures that Congress and the Administration might conclude is appropriate for putting the U.S.'s finances on a sustainable footing. The act calls for as much as $2.4 trillion of reductions in expenditure growth over the 10 years through 2021. These cuts will be implemented in two steps: the $917 billion agreed to initially, followed by an additional $1.5 trillion that the newly formed Congressional Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction is supposed to recommend by November 2011. The act contains no measures to raise taxes or otherwise enhance revenues, though the committee could recommend them. The act further provides that if Congress does not enact the committee's recommendations, cuts of $1.2 trillion will be implemented over the same time period. The reductions would mainly affect outlays for civilian discretionary spending, defense, and Medicare. We understand that this fall-back mechanism is designed to encourage Congress to embrace a more balanced mix of expenditure savings, as the committee might recommend. We note that in a letter to Congress on Aug. 1, 2011, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated total budgetary savings under the act to be at least $2.1 trillion over the next 10 years relative to its baseline assumptions. In updating our own fiscal projections, with certain modifications outlined below, we have relied on the CBO's latest "Alternate Fiscal Scenario" of June 2011, updated to include the CBO assumptions contained in its Aug. 1 letter to Congress. In general, the CBO's "Alternate Fiscal Scenario" assumes a continuation of recent Congressional action overriding existing law. We view the act's measures as a step toward fiscal consolidation. However, this is within the framework of a legislative mechanism that leaves open the details of what is finally agreed to until the end of 2011, and Congress and the Administration could modify any agreement in the future. Even assuming that at least $2.1 trillion of the spending reductions the act envisages are implemented, we maintain our view that the U.S. net general government debt burden (all levels of government combined, excluding liquid financial assets) will likely continue to grow. Under our revised base case fiscal scenario--which we consider to be consistent with a 'AA+' long-term rating and a negative outlook--we now project that net general government debt would rise from an estimated 74% of GDP by the end of 2011 to 79% in 2015 and 85% by 2021. Even the projected 2015 ratio of sovereign indebtedness is high in relation to those of peer credits and, as noted, would continue to rise under the act's revised policy settings. Compared with previous projections, our revised base case scenario now assumes that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, due to expire by the end of 2012, remain in place. We have changed our assumption on this because the majority of Republicans in Congress continue to resist any measure that would raise revenues, a position we believe Congress reinforced by passing the act. Key macroeconomic assumptions in the base case scenario include trend real GDP

Standard & Poor’s | RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal | August 5, 2011

4
883559 | 300978643

Research Update: United States of America Long-Term Rating Lowered To 'AA+' On Political Risks And Rising Debt Burden; Outlook Negative

growth of 3% and consumer price inflation near 2% annually over the decade. Our revised upside scenario--which, other things being equal, we view as consistent with the outlook on the 'AA+' long-term rating being revised to stable--retains these same macroeconomic assumptions. In addition, it incorporates $950 billion of new revenues on the assumption that the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for high earners lapse from 2013 onwards, as the Administration is advocating. In this scenario, we project that the net general government debt would rise from an estimated 74% of GDP by the end of 2011 to 77% in 2015 and to 78% by 2021. Our revised downside scenario--which, other things being equal, we view as being consistent with a possible further downgrade to a 'AA' long-term rating--features less-favorable macroeconomic assumptions, as outlined below and also assumes that the second round of spending cuts (at least $1.2 trillion) that the act calls for does not occur. This scenario also assumes somewhat higher nominal interest rates for U.S. Treasuries. We still believe that the role of the U.S. dollar as the key reserve currency confers a government funding advantage, one that could change only slowly over time, and that Fed policy might lean toward continued loose monetary policy at a time of fiscal tightening. Nonetheless, it is possible that interest rates could rise if investors re-price relative risks. As a result, our alternate scenario factors in a 50 basis point (bp)-75 bp rise in 10-year bond yields relative to the base and upside cases from 2013 onwards. In this scenario, we project the net public debt burden would rise from 74% of GDP in 2011 to 90% in 2015 and to 101% by 2021. Our revised scenarios also take into account the significant negative revisions to historical GDP data that the Bureau of Economic Analysis announced on July 29. From our perspective, the effect of these revisions underscores two related points when evaluating the likely debt trajectory of the U.S. government. First, the revisions show that the recent recession was deeper than previously assumed, so the GDP this year is lower than previously thought in both nominal and real terms. Consequently, the debt burden is slightly higher. Second, the revised data highlight the sub-par path of the current economic recovery when compared with rebounds following previous post-war recessions. We believe the sluggish pace of the current economic recovery could be consistent with the experiences of countries that have had financial crises in which the slow process of debt deleveraging in the private sector leads to a persistent drag on demand. As a result, our downside case scenario assumes relatively modest real trend GDP growth of 2.5% and inflation of near 1.5% annually going forward. When comparing the U.S. to sovereigns with 'AAA' long-term ratings that we view as relevant peers--Canada, France, Germany, and the U.K.--we also observe, based on our base case scenarios for each, that the trajectory of the U.S.'s net public debt is diverging from the others. Including the U.S., we estimate that these five sovereigns will have net general government debt to GDP ratios this year ranging from 34% (Canada) to 80% (the U.K.), with the U.S. debt burden at 74%. By 2015, we project that their net public debt to GDP ratios will range between 30% (lowest, Canada) and 83% (highest, France), with the U.S. debt burden at 79%. However, in contrast with the U.S., we project that the net public debt burdens of these other sovereigns will begin to decline, either before or by 2015.

www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect

5
883559 | 300978643

Research Update: United States of America Long-Term Rating Lowered To 'AA+' On Political Risks And Rising Debt Burden; Outlook Negative

Standard & Poor's transfer T&C assessment of the U.S. remains 'AAA'. Our T&C assessment reflects our view of the likelihood of the sovereign restricting other public and private issuers' access to foreign exchange needed to meet debt service. Although in our view the credit standing of the U.S. government has deteriorated modestly, we see little indication that official interference of this kind is entering onto the policy agenda of either Congress or the Administration. Consequently, we continue to view this risk as being highly remote.

Outlook
The outlook on the long-term rating is negative. As our downside alternate fiscal scenario illustrates, a higher public debt trajectory than we currently assume could lead us to lower the long-term rating again. On the other hand, as our upside scenario highlights, if the recommendations of the Congressional Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction--independently or coupled with other initiatives, such as the lapsing of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts for high earners--lead to fiscal consolidation measures beyond the minimum mandated, and we believe they are likely to slow the deterioration of the government's debt dynamics, the long-term rating could stabilize at 'AA+'. On Monday, we will issue separate releases concerning affected ratings in the funds, government-related entities, financial institutions, insurance, public finance, and structured finance sectors.

Related Criteria And Research
• United States of America 'AAA/A-1+' Ratings Placed On CreditWatch Negative On Rising Risk Of Policy Stalemate, July 14, 2011 • U.S. Weekly Financial Notes: Soft Patch Or Quicksand?, Aug. 5, 2011 • Sovereign Government Rating Methodology And Assumptions, June 30, 2011 • 2011 Midyear Credit Outlook: Unresolved Economic And Regulatory Issues Loom Large, June 22, 2011 • Global Aging 2011: In The U.S., Going Gray Will Likely Cost Even More Green, Now, June 21, 2011 • United States of America 'AAA/A-1+' Rating Affirmed; Outlook Revised To Negative, April 18, 2011 • Fiscal Challenges Weighing On The 'AAA' Sovereign Credit Rating On The Government Of The United States, April 18, 2011 • A Closer Look At The Revision Of The Outlook On The U.S. Government Rating , April 18, 2011 • Banking Industry Country Risk Assessments, March 8, 2011 • Behind The Political Brinkmanship Of Raising The U.S. Debt Ceiling, Jan. 18, 2011 • U.S. Government Cost To Resolve And Relaunch Fannie Mae And Freddie Mac Could Approach $700 Billion, Nov. 4, 2010 • Global Aging 2010: In The U.S., Going Gray Will Cost A Lot More Green, Oct. 25, 2010, • Après Le Déluge, The U.S. Dollar Remains The Key International Currency," March 10, 2010 • Banking Industry Country Risk Assessment: United States of America, Feb.

Standard & Poor’s | RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal | August 5, 2011

6
883559 | 300978643

Research Update: United States of America Long-Term Rating Lowered To 'AA+' On Political Risks And Rising Debt Burden; Outlook Negative

1, 2010

Ratings List
Rating Lowered To From United States of America (Unsolicited Ratings) Federal Reserve System (Unsolicited Ratings) Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Unsolicited Ratings) Sovereign Credit Rating AA+/Negative/A-1+ AAA/Watch Neg/A-1+

This unsolicited rating(s) was initiated by Standard & Poor's. It may be based solely on publicly available information and may or may not involve the participation of the issuer. Standard & Poor's has used information from sources believed to be reliable based on standards established in our Credit Ratings Information and Data Policy but does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information used. Complete ratings information is available to subscribers of RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal at www.globalcreditportal.com. All ratings affected by this rating action can be found on Standard & Poor's public Web site at www.standardandpoors.com. Use the Ratings search box located in the left column.

www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect

7
883559 | 300978643

Copyright © 2011 by Standard & Poors Financial Services LLC (S&P), a subsidiary of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. No content (including ratings, credit-related analyses and data, model, software or other application or output therefrom) or any part thereof (Content) may be modified, reverse engineered, reproduced or distributed in any form by any means, or stored in a database or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of S&P. The Content shall not be used for any unlawful or unauthorized purposes. S&P, its affiliates, and any third-party providers, as well as their directors, officers, shareholders, employees or agents (collectively S&P Parties) do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or availability of the Content. S&P Parties are not responsible for any errors or omissions, regardless of the cause, for the results obtained from the use of the Content, or for the security or maintenance of any data input by the user. The Content is provided on an "as is" basis. S&P PARTIES DISCLAIM ANY AND ALL EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ANY WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE OR USE, FREEDOM FROM BUGS, SOFTWARE ERRORS OR DEFECTS, THAT THE CONTENT'S FUNCTIONING WILL BE UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT THE CONTENT WILL OPERATE WITH ANY SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE CONFIGURATION. In no event shall S&P Parties be liable to any party for any direct, indirect, incidental, exemplary, compensatory, punitive, special or consequential damages, costs, expenses, legal fees, or losses (including, without limitation, lost income or lost profits and opportunity costs) in connection with any use of the Content even if advised of the possibility of such damages. Credit-related analyses, including ratings, and statements in the Content are statements of opinion as of the date they are expressed and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, hold, or sell any securities or to make any investment decisions. S&P assumes no obligation to update the Content following publication in any form or format. The Content should not be relied on and is not a substitute for the skill, judgment and experience of the user, its management, employees, advisors and/or clients when making investment and other business decisions. S&P's opinions and analyses do not address the suitability of any security. S&P does not act as a fiduciary or an investment advisor. While S&P has obtained information from sources it believes to be reliable, S&P does not perform an audit and undertakes no duty of due diligence or independent verification of any information it receives. S&P keeps certain activities of its business units separate from each other in order to preserve the independence and objectivity of their respective activities. As a result, certain business units of S&P may have information that is not available to other S&P business units. S&P has established policies and procedures to maintain the confidentiality of certain non-public information received in connection with each analytical process. S&P may receive compensation for its ratings and certain credit-related analyses, normally from issuers or underwriters of securities or from obligors. S&P reserves the right to disseminate its opinions and analyses. S&P's public ratings and analyses are made available on its Web sites, www.standardandpoors.com (free of charge), and www.ratingsdirect.com and www.globalcreditportal.com (subscription), and may be distributed through other means, including via S&P publications and third-party redistributors. Additional information about our ratings fees is available at www.standardandpoors.com/usratingsfees.

Standard & Poor’s | RatingsDirect on the Global Credit Portal | August 5, 2011

8
883559 | 300978643

Similar Documents

Free Essay

U.S. Dollar Is Still the Safest Currency in the World

...months after Standard & Poor’s stripped the U.S. of its AAA credit rating and said the world’s biggest economy was no longer the safest of borrowers, dollar- denominated financial assets are doing nothing but appreciating. Government bonds have returned 4.4 percent, the dollar has gained 8.6 percent relative to a basket of currencies, and the S&P 500 Index of stocks has rallied 1.7 percent since the U.S. was cut to AA+ from AAA on Aug. 5. The cost for the nation to borrow has fallen to record lows since S&P said the U.S. was no longer risk-free, with the average monthly yield in November on 10-year notes below 2 percent for the first time since 1950. Demand for American assets is increasing as consumer confidence, manufacturing and employment show the U.S. is strengthening as Europe struggles to save its currency union and the developed world weakens. U.S. gross domestic product will expand 2.19 percent next year, compared with 1.55 percent for the Group of 10 nations, Bloomberg surveys of economists show. “The U.S. is our favorite market,” Hiromasa Nakamura, a bond investor in Tokyo at Mizuho Asset Management Co., which oversees the equivalent of about $42 billion, said Dec. 12 in a telephone interview. “The level of debt is high but I think they will deal with it,” he said. “Financial dislocations are continuing and investor money is flowing to the reserve currency, the U.S. dollar.” Currency Advantage When it lowered the U.S. rating, S&P, the world’s largest......

Words: 1983 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Rising Us Unemployment and the Canadian Dollar

...one can determine that Canada’s exports decreased rapidly due to rising economic turmoil in the United States. The effects on the dollar seemed to positively correlate. Canada’s dollar decreased in value compared to the US dollar; however, concluding that the reason for this change was due to the U.S. unemployment rate is inaccurate. The ever-changing exchange rate of the dollar is determined by many factors. As of 2011, Canadian and American unemployment rates remain high at approximately 7.3% and 9%, respectively. In addition, a trade deficit continues to exist in Canada. Nevertheless, the Canadian dollar is gaining strength over the American dollar, which contrasts with the weakened exchange rate in 2009 when the same conditions existed (refer to graph 4). Therefore, rising U.S. unemployment can have a positive or negative affect on the Canadian dollar. I will examine how the increasing U.S. unemployment rate can potentially strengthen or weaken the loonie. A rise in U.S. unemployment can indicate a relationship with the rise of the Canadian dollar. The increase in U.S. unemployment is a result of America’s 2008 recession. When unemployment increases in America, the U.S. Federal Reserve needs to decrease interest rates in order to stimulate the economy (as exemplified in graphs 2 and 5). If interest rates are high, consumers will save their money and try to cut back on spending. If interest rates are low, consumers are encouraged to borrow money from the banks and......

Words: 1619 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

The Economic Function of Credit Rating Agencies

...credit rating agencies from a passive player providing creditworthiness certification to a more active credit monitoring entity. First, the paper examines if the Watchlist instrument changes the informational content of credit ratings. Next, the paper tested between two different explanatory lines regarding the function of the rating agencies by analyzing their use of the Watchlist as delivering information to market participants and creating an implicit contract to influence a firm’s risk choices via the threat of a credit downgrade. They find that the general market reaction to downgrades is stronger in the post-Watchlist period, which is consistent with previous research conclusions. These results hence indicate that the informational content of rating downgrades has strongly risen after the introduction of Watchlist. Additionally, the authors find that direct rating downgrades trigger a much stronger market reaction than watch-preceded downgrades. These findings support previous conclusions by Cheng and Neamtiu on whether and how rating agencies respond to mounting regulatory pressure. With the introduction of the Watchlist, rating agencies provide timely and accurate information to market participants. The Watchlist instrument has enhanced the role of credit rating agencies. As a result, markets have placed more confidence in the conclusive results of the review procedure as it is seen as another level of information to financial markets. Credit Rating......

Words: 2561 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Exploring the Web

...1:17PM EDT - Nasdaq Real Time Price ------------------------------------------------- Top of FormAnalyst Opinion | Bottom of Form | | Recommendation Summary* | Mean Recommendation (this week): | 2.3 | Mean Recommendation (last week): | 2.3 | Change: | 0.0 | * (Strong Buy) 1.0 - 5.0 (Sell)Compare to Industry Price Target Summary | Mean Target: | 16.57 | Median Target: | 16.00 | High Target: | 19.50 | Low Target: | 13.00 | No. of Brokers: | 23 | Data provided by Thomson/First Call | | | | | | Upgrades & Downgrades History | Date | Research Firm | Action | From | To | May 23, 2012 | Mizuho | Downgrade | Buy | Neutral | Mar 16, 2012 | Standpoint Research | Upgrade | Hold | Buy | Feb 22, 2012 | Needham | Downgrade | Buy | Hold | Feb 17, 2012 | Robert W. Baird | Downgrade | Outperform | Neutral | Feb 17, 2012 | Maxim Group | Initiated | | Buy | Feb 15, 2012 | Standpoint Research | Downgrade | Buy | Hold | Feb 9, 2012 | Mizuho | Initiated | | Buy | Oct 14, 2011 | ISI Group | Initiated | | Hold | Aug 19, 2011 | Ticonderoga | Initiated | | Sell | Aug 19, 2011 | Needham | Upgrade | Hold | Buy | | | Recommendation Trends | | Current Month | Last Month | Two Months Ago | Three Months Ago | Strong Buy | 9 | 9 | 10 | 11 | Buy | 5 | 5 | 6 | 9 | Hold | 13 | 13 | 12 | 9 | Underperform | 2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | Sell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | | | Hewlett-Packard Business Summary | | Hewlett-Packard Company and......

Words: 1589 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Effects of Changes in Sovereign Credit Ratings on Investors’ Behavior

...events 33 Conclusion 46 Reference list 48 Appendix 52 Section I: Rating symbols & definitions 52 Section II: Tables 54 Section III: Figures 56 Section IV: Extended theory 57 Section V: Graphs 59 Section VI: Data 67 Section VII: Testing classical assumptions 71 Abstract Firstly, this paper investigates if investors react to changes in sovereign credit ratings. Hereby rating changes for European, Non-European and European Union countries are considered for the period: 1990-2011. Using both bond spreads and credit default swap (CDS) spreads as measures for investors’ behavior, analysis shows that changes in sovereign credit ratings significantly affect these spreads. Furthermore evidence is found that a rating downgrade of a sovereign country has a bigger impact on the spreads than a rating upgrade. Secondly, it is theoretically examined why investors would react to changes in credit ratings. If they are fully rational they would normally only use credit ratings as the sole information source for estimating the default risk of a country, but irrational behavior, as a result of behavioral biases, might influence this estimation. Thirdly, it is analyzed if business cycles are a key determinant in explaining deviations in sovereign bond and CDS spreads surrounding a sovereign credit rating event. This notion is not fully supported, since these cycles play a role in explaining deviations in CDS spreads, but the same does not hold for bond spreads.......

Words: 21349 - Pages: 86

Premium Essay

Babiboo

...of December 2004, the global market capitalization of the CMBS market was slightly over $541 billion. About 1 in 5 commercial and multifamily mortgages are in CMBS, compared to a securitization rate of about 50% for residential mortgages. CMBS offer several advantages over commercial whole loans. Securitization allows for the division of the loan into credit classes so that an investor may buy a class rated from AAA to single-B and unrated. In addition, CMBS are marked to market on a daily basis and hence are more liquid than whole loans. CMBS appeal to a wide array of investors because of attractive relative spreads and stronger call protection than residential mortgage securities. DEVELOPMENT O F T HE M ARKET Before the mid-1990s the U.S. real estate business was predominately a private market. Lending was dominated by a handful of banks, life insurance companies, and pension funds. Real estate ownership was regionally focused with ownership concentrated in a few hands. Families and private partnerships were the largest owners. Small and diversified investments in real estate were almost nonexistent. Real estate is a cyclical business moving through various stages of expansion, equilibrium, slow growth, and recovery. Private ownership of real estate and lack of public information fostered extreme real estate cycles. Development and lending was done on a regional basis with little national information. The steep real estate recession of the late 1980s and early 1990s was......

Words: 93545 - Pages: 375

Premium Essay

Ravinder

...recover some of the lost margins. Foodles grew just 13% (22% in 1HCY11). GSK launched Horlicks Gold at a 30% premium to the base Horlicks variant. New launches yet to make significant impact; Valuations rich for a single category business; Downgrade to Neutral We believe SKB is well placed to capture healthy growth in the MFD space and a strong rebound from 1QCY11 is testament to that. However, with competitive intensity increasing in this segment, SKB will have to continue to spend aggressively, which may reduce the frequency of new product introductions. Margin pressures are likely to persist and though we do not expect a severe gross margin contraction to continue, firm input costs and a changing product mix (rising share of low margin non-MFD) will restrict meaningful margin expansion in future. We are revising our estimates downwards by 1-2% to factor in lower margins and lower sales growth in Foodles and Nutribar. Our CY11 MFD volume growth estimates are revised from 10.5% to 11%. Limited success of new product launches (failure of Chilled Dood, Nutribar and Horlicks Asha and moderating growth in Foodles) and margin pressure make valuations rich at 28.6x CY11E and 24.1x CY12E EPS of INR84.3 and INR100.1 respectively. We downgrade the stock to Neutral with a target price of INR2,300 (23x CY12E). Amnish Aggarwal (AmnishAggarwal@MotilalOswal.com); Tel:+9122 3982 5404 Harit Kapoor (Harit.Kapoor@MotilalOswal.com); Tel:+9122 3029 5120 GSK......

Words: 2867 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Nyt Article

...government had few options to increase growth, dual concerns that overshadowed the downgrade of long-term United States government debt. The Dow Jones industrial average fell 634 points, or 5.6 percent, and the Standard & Poor’s 500- stock index dropped 6.7 percent, the biggest retreats since December 2008 in the midst of the financial crisis, accelerating a sell-off that began a couple of weeks ago. The S.& P. 500 is now down 18 percent from its April 29 peak and is nearing official bear market territory, defined as a fall of 20 percent. The selloff continued Tuesday morning in Asia. The Nikkei 225 in Tokyo was down 4.1 percent at midmorning, while the Kospi in Seoul lost 5.7 percent. Shares in Australia sank 4.8 percent, and early indicators suggested that other markets would follow suit. S.& P. futures fell 2 percent, signaling a lower open for markets in New York. So anxious are many investors that they poured money into Treasury securities, the debt the government sells to finance its operations. Even though the ratings agency Standard & Poor’s downgraded United States debt a notch from the sterling AAA rating on Friday, judging them a slightly higher risk than before, many still deem Treasuries to be safer than just about any other investment. Typically, a downgrade would cause investors to sell, but financial turmoil in Europe and policy gridlock in Washington overrode concerns about the downgrade. “This is investors running from risk wherever they see it,” said David......

Words: 1345 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Ge273 Project Part 2/3

...desires, and the ability to have them all right now. All we have to do is ask and there will be someone willing to lend us the money to have what we want right now. The only problem is that we are expected to pay that back at some point. For the average American, we have a credit score to determine our debt worthiness. The better the score, the higher the probability that particular individual will pay back the debt. Similar to that, the United States has been given a "credit rating" by Standard & Poor's over the years. That score has always been the highest possible score as the United States government has always been a sure-fire bet for paying a debt. Recently, S&P has downgraded the U.S. government's debt rating. S&P was quoted in "Forbes.com" as saying "The downgrade reflects our opinion that the fiscal consolidation plan that Congress and the Administration recently agreed to falls short of what, in our view, would be necessary to stabilize the government's medium-term debt dynamics." (Forbes.com) I believe this is the biggest evidence that our spending and debit management has gotten out of control. The United States needs to get back into a mindset that we can no longer afford to spend more money than we are making. I understand that there are many national programs that all require funding. There are some families in this country that have to make the decision each month on which bill to pay because they cannot afford to pay them all. Our......

Words: 1323 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

American National Insurance Co.

...American National Insurance Co. COMPANY OVERVIEW American National Insurance Co. is a major American insurance corporation. The corporate headquarter is located in Galveston, Texas since founding in 1905 by William Lewis Moody. American National Insurance Co. and its subsidiaries (collectively “American National”) operate in all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and American Samoa. Subsidiaries consist of six life insurance companies, eight property and casualty insurance companies, and numerous non-insurance subsidiaries all operating only domestically. The company conducts its business through five segments. The following segments are: * Life * Annuity * Health * Property and casualty * Corporate and Other In addition, through non-insurance subsidiaries, American National invests in stocks and real estate. The majority of revenues are generated by the insurance business. It is ranking among the largest of life insurance companies in the United States. Therefore, the life insurance continues to be the core product today through their long history. Various distribution systems are utilized, including multiple-line exclusive agents, independent agents, third-party marketing organizations, career agents, and direct sales to the public. As of September 2011, American National Insurance Company’s (Nasdaq: ANAT) total revenue was $3.04 billion. RISK FACTORS American National, being a leading insurance company, is also exposed...

Words: 3132 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Do Firm Target Credit Ratings

...in Pakistan reduce their leverage following credit downgrades…? 1.3 Introduction to the context The author Darren J. Kisgen (2009) studied the leverage behavior for 17 years and suggested that manager should be concerned for choosing best leverage in the firm. 1.4 Introduction to methodology and methods This study is based on the secondary data available for further analysis and the weighted least square model will be run in order to proof the influence on leverage. 1.5 Scope of the research (limitations or delimitations) This study includes those company whose credit ratings are available on PACRA website. 1.6 Conclusion of the section The aim of this study is to find out the influence of explanatory variables on leverage of non-financial firms operating in Pakistan and its importance in business organization using WLS model. SECTION 2 2.1 LITERATURE REVIEW Introduction Kisgen (2009)argued that financial manager tackle capital arrangement behavior to target minimum credit ratings limit. This behavior is just because of specific relation for the advantage of higher credit ratings after taking into consideration target leverage behavior. Firms seen with more likelihood to reduce debt and less likely to issue debt succeeding credit rating downgrade and they behave less likely to reduce shareholder equity. Further capital arrangements are affected due to for credit ratings downgrade previous year than by changes in leverage and......

Words: 2534 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Sept 11

...with itself internally. It has a Congress where there is conflict between the right (Republican) and the left (Democrats) and where they don't even want to talk to each other to discuss on a resolution for Americas bankruptcy problems and threats. The reason the U.S became great was because of its openness and democratic way. Now, it has become distrustful against foreigners, and anyone who is different which is not the theology the U.S was founded on . In U.S territory now we hunt down illegal immigrants and many people can still not accept having a black president in the White House. It’s interesting to see in the article how the event of 9/11 is attributed to the decline of America. No matter how you measure it, the United States remains the single most influential country economically, politically, diplomatically and militarily. For most of the past years, the U.S. economy has grown at a steady, generating higher incomes and wealth for American people. But since 2000 there has been a sharp decline in that trend of growth. The past decade has been the worst for the U.S. The U.S has been faced with high unemployment, stagnant wages, the protracted debate over raising the government debt ceiling and the downgrade of U.S. The problem of America’s decline is worsened by the rise of other power countries. There are other countries that have the potential towards achieving superpower status within the 21st century such as China, Brazil, the European Union, India and Russia.......

Words: 511 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Timkin

...about the impact on its balance sheet. If Ingersoll-Rand demanded a cash deal and Is this essay helpful? Upgrade your account to read more and access more than 650,000 just like it! get better grades if Timken raised the money with new debt, the increased leverage would almost certainly prompt credit agencies to downgrade Timken’s investment-grade rating. The Bearing Industry Bearings of various sizes and specifications found their way into everything from space shuttles to household appliances, automobiles, dentist drills, roller skates, and computer disk drives. In 2001, U.S. establishments involved in ball- and roller-bearing manufacturing employed more than 33,000 workers. The bearing industry was facing a variety of complex problems. Policies favoring the steel industry were not always in the best interest of the bearing industry, which, as manufacturers of secondary steel products, was in the middle of the production chain. Because bearings were essential components of military and civilian machinery and equipment, the federal government had historically been a major customer. Nonetheless, foreign competitors had taken business away from U.S......

Words: 328 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Auto and Insurance Industry

...of the U.S. motor vehicle industry. Whatever changes are occurring globally or within the domestic market, production and sales in the U.S. remain at historically higher levels. Gross output in the U.S. automotive manufacturing sector in 2004, including motor vehicle parts, trailers, bodies, and heavy trucks was $424 billion. That was the largest output of any durable goods manufactured product measured by the Commerce Department Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA). Real output has increased 55% since 190, compared to 35% for manufacturing as a whole. The industry has expanded from just over $100 billion per year in the late 1970s to nearly $500 billion in 1999, which is still the all time peak. Gross output declined in 2000-01, rose to $436 billion in 2002, but fell slightly to $425 billion in 2004. Gross output includes the value of intermediate inputs as well as that of the final assembly process. The automotive industry includes those industries associated with the production, wholesaling, retailing, and maintenance of motor vehicles. The average hourly income for the automotive industry varies depending on which industry you are dealing with varies. In the manufacturing industry the annual average for 2010 was $22 an hour. Today there has been little change in that rate. In a 12 month period there has only been about a twelve cent difference in that rate. The industry has not changed much; in fact some salaries have only changed by just a little. U.S.......

Words: 596 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

European Debt Market

...European debt crisis continue to bring influences to the global economy during the week. , During the week, “Standarad and Poor’s (S&P) downgraded Italy’s credit rating from a A+/A-1+ to A/A-1” beacuse of “Italy’s weakening economic growth prospects” and “a view that its governing coalition would limit the government’s ability to respond decisively.” Such a downgrade affects the Australian Forex falling “to a five-week low” and economists expected that currency market is “driven by further news on eurozone debt woes.” Moreover, the three top US banks, Bank of America, Wells Fargo and Citigroup was downgraded by Moody’s because of “the US givernment less willing than before to rescue them if they become unstable.” Such news bring influences to Australia Forex and causing it “trading near its 10-month low as traders worry about a possible recession in the US and Europe.” I was thinking to change my trading position to sell rather than buy for Australia Forex as I found that the market expectations were mianly different from my positive expectations.. However, “Westpac New Zealand senior market strategist Imre Speizer said the mood on currency markets was slightly more positive on expectations world central bankers and finance officials were closer to a decision ona more comprehensive solution for Europe’s debt woes.” Such news gives me confidence that once there is a solution to the present situation to Eurozone the Forex market could rise. Rather than that, another news saying...

Words: 1004 - Pages: 5