Free Essay

Unit 9 Case Study Ls311

In: Business and Management

Submitted By cwinsor1
Words 267
Pages 2
Unit 9 Case Analysis

Kaplan University
School of Business
LS311: Business and Law I
March 4, 2013

Unit 9 Case Analysis  Discuss the exempt securities pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Act.
 Determine whether or not Langley Brothers would be subject to registration requirements. Although most securities are required to be registered with the SEC, there are a few exceptions that allow for certain securities and transactions to be exempt from the registration process. Government-issued securities, Bank and financial securities, short term notes and drafts, securities of non-profit, educational, and charitable organizations, securities issued by common carriers, any insurance, endowment, or annuity contract issued by a state-regulated insurance company, securities issued in a corporate reorganization, securities issued by stock dividends and stock splits. In addition to these types securities there are some transactions that are also exempt from registration. The transaction exceptions are very broad and can enable an issuer of a security to avoid the expensive and time consuming process of registering, and therefore many sales of securities occur without registration. For example, any issuer that has offered less than five million in securities within a twelve month period is not required to register. Langley Brothers would not be subject to register the offering under Regulation A. They must file a notice of issue and an offering circular, but they do not need to go through the full registration process because they are offering less than 5 million in securities within the specified twelve month time frame.

Miller, R., & Jentz, G. (2008). Fundamentals of business law part I. Boston, MA: Cengage

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Unit 9 Assignment: Case Study

...Course: LS311: Business Law I Instructor: Prof. Jeffery Hazard Unit 9 Assignment: Case Study Name: Bridget Okpobia Date: 12/19/2012 This essay will explain the following four questions. First, would registration with the SEC be required for Dakota Gasworks securities? Second, Did Emerson violate Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5? Third what theory or theories might a court use to hold Wallace liable for insider trading? Finally, under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, who would be required to certify the accuracy of financial statements filed with the SEC? Would registration with the SEC be required for Dakota Gasworks securities? Why or why not? Reliant Energy has registered securities and faces a takeover attempt, or third party tender offer, then the SEC’s tender offer rules will apply to the transaction. The filings required by these rules provide information to the public about the person making the tender offer. The company, Dakota Gasworks, is experiencing the takeover so they must file with the SEC its responses to the tender offer. These rules set time limits for the tender offer and provide some protection to shareholders. Did Emerson violate Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5? Why or why not? Moreover, Emerson did violate rule 10b-5 of the Securities exchange act, in where it protects against insider trading; which is the purchase or sale by person with access to information not......

Words: 576 - Pages: 3