McDonald’s Case Study V McDonald’s perceived product positioning maps in comparison to their corporate strategy do line up to what is expected. There are areas for improvement in relation to their direct competition in every town. In reference to EPS/EBIT, it is relevant to their strategy implementation. McDonald’s product positioning maps do line up with their corporate strategy. Their strategy or motto is “Plan to Win”. When I think of a fast food restaurant winning, I think of winning over the masses of customer traffic. They certainly do this well. What makes up this strategy is; continued growth in the US and abroad, being a sustainable company, new items, new designs of business models, and remaining very competitive (NMINM's University, "n.d."). There is nothing about being the best quality, friendliest customer service, healthiest option, or most comfortable atmosphere. In these categories, I feel that they want to just do better than they have in the past with continued improvements. When you take a look at these product positioning maps, they tend to fall on the lower ends and very conservative in many fields such as atmosphere, quality, healthy choices, and limited choices (NMINM's University, "n.d."). Areas they tend to do better than some of their competition is speed of service, taste, and price (NMINM's University, "n.d."). This is in line with sales. These are the categories that the masses of customers tend to pay more attention to. There are over 32,000 units open and with them be accepted with taste, speed of service, and especially price, this is the draw for the majority of customers (David, 2011). When it comes to gaps or their weaknesses, Burger King and their fresh ground beef patties wins in the industry for quality. Chick-fil-A will win in the customer service. For areas like these, it would be a